Planning Commission
Regular MeetingSunnyvale, CA · December 5, 2016
Minutes
City of Sunnyvale
Meeting Minutes - Revised
Planning Commission
Monday, December 5, 2016 7:00 PM Council Chambers and West Conference
Room, City Hall, 456 W. Olive Ave.,
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Study Session Cancelled | Special Meeting - Public Hearing 7 PM
6 P.M. STUDY SESSION CANCELLED
7 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Harrison called the meeting to order at 7:02 PM in the Council Chambers.
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
Chair Harrison led the salute to the flag.
ROLL CALL
Present: 6 - Chair Sue Harrison
Vice Chair Ken Rheaume
Commissioner John Howe
Commissioner Russ Melton
Commissioner David Simons
Commissioner Carol Weiss
Absent: 1 - Commissioner Ken Olevson
Status of absence; Commissioner's Olevson absence is excused.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS
2. 16-1080 FILE #: 2016-7944
Location: 225 S. Taaffe Street (Block 18 of Downtown Specific Plan
City of Sunnyvale Page 1
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
bounded by Mathilda, Washington, Sunnyvale and Iowa Avenues)
Proposed Project: Adopt the Tenant Design Guidelines for storefront
design, commercial signage and tenant improvements for retail uses
within the Sunnyvale Town Center project
Applicant/Owner: STC Venture LLC (applicant/owner)
Environmental Review: No additional environmental review is
necessary; the adoption of the proposed Tenant Design Guidelines is
within the scope of the previous environmental analysis for the
Downtown Program Improvement Update, pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2) and is categorically exempt pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305.
Staff Contact: Hanson Hom, (408) 730-7450,
hhom@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Assistant City Manager Hanson Hom presented the staff report.
Commissioner Weiss clarified with Assistant City Manager Hom that Macy’s and
Target are part of Block 18 but not owned by STC Venture LLC, therefore the
Tenant Design Guidelines do not apply to those properties. Commissioner Weiss
confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that signs and displays used by Macy’s
and Target must comply with the Downtown Specific Plan Design Guidelines, as
well as sign code and zoning code requirements.
Commissioner Weiss commented that the Tenant Design Guidelines prohibit
advertisements for products, services, sales or promotions and asked staff how
businesses would advertise sales or new products. Assistant City Manager Hom
advised that temporary advertisements for promotional sales are allowed, with
maximum use limited to 25% of the window space, and sign code provisions apply.
Commissioner Weiss clarified with Assistant City Manager Hom that the
requirement for public restrooms is determined by the building code and the
landlord’s specific requirements.
Commissioner Weiss asked Assistant City Manager Hom about pedestrian only
streets and it was determined this is better suited as a future discussion. Assistant
City Manager Hom commented that streets would likely be temporarily closed for
future downtown events.
Vice Chair Rheaume commented that South Murphy Avenue would include a
variety of retail uses with an emphasis on relating architectural design to the
historic character of South Murphy Avenue. Vice Chair Rheaume asked staff to
explain how the guidelines would apply to future buildings along the new section of
South Murphy Avenue. Assistant City Manager Hom advised the intent is not for
new retail fronts to replicate the historic character of South Murphy Avenue but that
City of Sunnyvale Page 2
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
their signage should be respectful of the Murphy Avenue corridor. Assistant City
Manager Hom noted that the Downtown Specific Plan outlines adherence to
signage guidelines.
Vice Chair Rheaume clarified with Assistant City Manager Hom that the goal is to
respect the historical character in the scale and detail of future modern buildings.
Vice Chair Rheaume asked staff what the entertainment district would include in
addition to the movie theatre. Assistant City Manager Hom advised that building T
proposes a ground floor grocery store and that adjacent restaurants or stores
would be pertinent to entertainment or the grocery store.
Commissioner Howe asked staff to advise if the process and cost of sign approvals
would differ for tenants in this district. Assistant City Manager Hom stated the hope
is to streamline sign review because the Tenant Design Guidelines provide
additional context. Assistant City Manager Hom advised individual signs have to be
reviewed by staff but approval of a Master Sign Program eliminates the need for
individual sign permits. Commissioner Howe confirmed with Planning Officer
Andrew Miner that once a Master Sign Program is approved there are no separate
fees for future proposed signs.
Commissioner Simons commented on the different levels of quality for window
graphics and asked for staff comments on regulation of the quality and duration of
these window graphics. Assistant City Manager Hom advised the Tenant Design
Guidelines don’t regulate window graphics but that the City has guidelines on
temporary signage and the property owner would have oversight to ensure quality.
Commissioner Simons and Assistant City Manager Hom discussed the difficulty of
defining thresholds for window graphic quality and enforcement. Planning Officer
Miner advised that window signs less than 25% of the total window area are
exempt from permitting and can’t be denied based on artistic quality. Commissioner
Simons noted it is concerning because it could lead to situations with poor quality
window graphics.
Commissioner Simons confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that Condition
of Approval A17.3 mandates all awnings are to be replaced at a minimum of five
years. Commissioner Simons requested an update that regardless of tenant
occupancy, if an awning looks degraded it needs to be replaced. Assistant City
Manager Hom confirmed this modification.
Commissioner Simons commented on the potential need to block off additional
City of Sunnyvale Page 3
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
storefront space during special events and asked for staff comments. Assistant City
Manager Hom advised there is a process in place to block off sidewalks for seating
and that an encroachment permit is required to close the public portion of the right
of way. Assistant City Manager Hom clarified that this applies uniformly to special
events or short term business usage.
Commissioner Simons asked staff to comment on the likelihood of an
encroachment permit being issued. Assistant City Manager Hom advised that
before approval of an encroachment permit any proposal to use a portion of the
public right of way would have to be approved by the property owner, who is
responsible for maintaining the public right of way.
Chair Harrison opened the public hearing.
Applicant Deke Hunter, representing STC Venture LLC, presented information
about the proposed project.
Philip D’Agostino, Senior Associate with SGPA Architecture and Planning,
presented images and information about the proposed project and commented that
window graphics are intended to be permanent signage and temporary signage
pertains to banners.
Chair Harrison closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Commissioner Simons moved and Commissioner Howe seconded the
motion for Alternatives 1 and 3 – Find that the adoption of the proposed Tenant
Design Guidelines is categorically exempt from environmental review under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15305, and none of the exceptions to the exemptions specified in CEQA Guidelines
Section 15300.2 have occurred, and that no additional environmental review is
necessary as the proposed amendments are within the scope of the previous
environmental analysis for the Downtown Program Improvement Update, pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section15168(c)(2); approve the Sunnyvale Town Center
Tenant Design Guidelines with modifications - to clarify that the awning will be
replaced regardless of tenant occupancy.
Commissioner Simons commented that potential concerns over the final look and
feel of a project are mitigated because the owner will be directly involved in
maintaining the property.
Planning Officer Miner confirmed that Commissioner Simons’ motion is Alternatives
City of Sunnyvale Page 4
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
1 and 3 with the awning modification.
Chair Harrison commented that the project was well done, that she can make the
findings and will be supporting the motion.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 6 - Chair Harrison
Vice Chair Rheaume
Commissioner Howe
Commissioner Melton
Commissioner Simons
Commissioner Weiss
No: 0
Absent: 1 - Commissioner Olevson
Planning Officer Miner stated this decision is final unless appealed to the City
Council within 15 days or called up by the City Council within 15 days.
3. 16-1115 FILE #: 2016-7968
Location: 150 E. McKinley Avenue and 330 S. Murphy Avenue;
APNs: 209-35-014 and 209-35-015 (Block 5 of the Sunnyvale Town
Center project bounded by McKinley, Sunnyvale, Iowa and Murphy
Avenues)
Proposed Project:
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT to modify the architectural
design plans for the two-story cinema/retail building (“Building
T”) and the adjacent public parking garage (“Penney’s Parking
Structure”) of the Sunnyvale Town Center project from the
original plans approved on August 13, 2007 (SDP 2007-0516).
Applicant/Owner: STC Venture LLC (applicant/owner)
Environmental Review: No additional environmental review is
necessary; the proposed architectural modifications to Building T and
the Penney’s Structure are within the scope of the previous
environmental analysis for the Downtown Program Improvement
Update, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2).
Staff Contact: Hanson Hom, (408) 730-7450,
hhom@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Assistant City Manager Hom presented the staff report.
Vice Chair Rheaume commented that a landscape median would be added to
Sunnyvale Avenue and asked for staff comments on how this will impact access to
City of Sunnyvale Page 5
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
the movie theatre traffic and truck traffic. Assistant City Manager Hom explained
that trucks would travel southbound on Sunnyvale Avenue and back into the
loading dock. Assistant City Manager Hom commented that the median has not
been designed yet and the Department of Public Works may shorten the median to
allow a left turn into the garage driveway.
Commissioner Howe confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that the current
proposal is for ten screens with 1,800 seats and that a minimum number of screens
was not designated in the staff report.
Commissioner Weiss commented that the loading dock is in a prominent location
and asked staff if there was a discussion to move it underground to decrease
noise. Assistant City Manager Hom advised there was a staff discussion regarding
this element and that the zoning code requirement ensures operational hours of 7
AM – 10 PM. Assistant City Manager Hom explained the Conditions of Approval
contains measures to ensure the wall is high enough and adequately buffered to
mitigate noise.
Commissioner Weiss stated concern over the aesthetic of the locking dock, since
this is a main approach to downtown Sunnyvale. Assistant City Manager Hom
advised there will be a decorative element along the wall of the parking garage and
suggested an additional wall could be added behind the landscaping to provide
additional screening.
Commissioner Weiss confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that the parcel of
land marked for future development (T1) is owned by STC Venture LLC. Assistant
City Manager Hom advised that approval for block five includes townhomes along
Iowa avenue, which are intended to screen off the parking structure. Assistant City
Manager Hom stated that the future development of this parcel is unknown but
staff’s recommendation is to enhance garage elevations along both frontages.
Chair Harrison confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that Penney’s Parking
Structure (currently owned by the successor agency for the City) has a
maintenance easement agreement which requires the tenant to maintain Penney’s
Parking Structure and continue the operation as a public parking structure.
Chair Harrison asked for staff comments on how the garage would encourage
movie patrons to use levels three and four for parking and if there is direct access
into the movie theatre. Assistant City Manager Hom advised it will be addressed
through programming and signage.
City of Sunnyvale Page 6
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
Vice Chair Rheaume asked staff to comment on future development of the T1
parcel. Assistant City Manager Hom explained that the 2007 plans allowed for
construction of three story townhomes along Iowa Avenue in order to screen off the
parking structure. Assistant City Manager Hom advised that this future
development is currently uncertain but per the Conditions of Approval the
construction fence is required to be removed or repainted by the property owner.
Chair Harrison opened the public hearing.
Applicant Deke Hunter, representing STC Venture LLC, presented information
about the proposed project. Mr. Hunter advised that entering the garage from
Murphy deposits you at the main level and entering the garage from Sunnyvale
Avenue deposits you on the second level – the ramp is accessible from either
entrance to access other levels. Mr. Hunter stated one hour parking is promoted at
the main and lower levels and signage directs you to the upper levels for long term
parking.
Glenn Wood, Associate Principal with SGPA Architecture and Planning, presented
images and information about the proposed project.
Commissioner Weiss asked if it’s commercially feasible to have two auditoriums
each with only 49 seats. Mr. Wood advised it is feasible because the direction of
luxury cinema is moving towards different size auditoriums in order to show a
variety of films.
Commissioner Weiss commented that the kitchen takes up a lot of space and
asked if it will also contain a restaurant. Mr. Wood stated there is a high likelihood
of a restaurant and bar on the mezzanine level and whether these amenities are
open to the public depends on the theatre operator.
Commissioner Simons confirmed with Mr. Hunter that their plan is to tear down the
temporary wall along Iowa Avenue and landscape that area and ensure the
previous plan is a still a good fit before building housing. Commissioner Simons
commented that if the landscaping intent is temporary it would be prudent to
implement ground cover instead of planting trees and Mr. Hunter confirmed.
Commissioner Simons commented that the previous intent of wrapping the housing
around the parking structure was to improve the look and feel of Sunnyvale Avenue
and Iowa Avenue and asked Mr. Hunter to explain the current intent. Mr. Hunter
advised there are three wallpaper structures along Iowa Avenue (F1, N1 and T1) –
F1 is behind the block one garage and is connected to the parking structure while
City of Sunnyvale Page 7
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
N1 and T1 will soften the impact of the back of the garages.
Commissioner Simons commented that there didn’t appear to be any parking
capability for T1 and Assistant City Manager Hom advised the intent is for
integrated access into the T1 area and Mr. Hunter stated for now the goal is to
landscape while future residential housing is evaluated.
Commissioner Simons stated that there is a need to designate parking now for
future housing. Mr. Wood commented that it is possible to implement a 24 foot wide
drive aisle. Mr. Hunter commented that there is no decision made about what to do
with the residential area, but they aren’t precluding it. Commissioner Simons stated
it’s problematic to move forward with Penney’s parking if it is not connected to
future housing.
Commissioner Simons commented that most service areas behind buildings are
dead zones and asked Mr. Hunter if they would use high quality surfaces and
architectural elements within service area N1. Mr. Wood showed the elevation and
an additional visualization looking down Sunnyvale Avenue to the Northwest. Mr.
Wood explained the use of alternating green walls and metal louvers and advised
there is a white element that steps the corner massing down.
Commissioner Simons commented that the Conditions of Approval should clarify
that aesthetic improvements should match Sunnyvale Avenue.
Vice Chair Rheaume confirmed with Mr. Hunter that the grocery store is the sole
occupant of the first floor, with the main entrance in the parking garage and a
secondary entrance at the corner of McKinley Avenue and Murphy Avenue.
Vice Chair Rheaume asked staff why an entrance wasn’t located at the corner of
West McKinley Avenue and Sunnyvale Avenue. Mr. Hunter explained that grocery
stores usually aggregate two openings and in this instance the opening closest to
parking was the more critical component. Vice Chair Rheaume noted that the lack
of additional entrances isn’t pedestrian friendly and asked for the applicant’s
comments on this design. Mr. Wood explained that while entrances on all four
corners is ideal, you have to maintain control points with the doors and that
signage, windows, awnings and lighting were incorporated to offset the lack of
additional entrances.
Vice Chair Rheaume asked for the applicant’s comments on the color palette for
buildings D, E and F, commenting that these colors appear very dark. Mr. Wood
advised they are using some of the same forms and materials as the Target
City of Sunnyvale Page 8
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
building and that the white highlights provide a contrast. Mr. Wood noted by
placing white highlights and warm details at the bottom you purposefully understate
the larger upper part of the building.
Commissioner Howe confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that the
Environmental Impact Report from June of 2003 referenced on page five of the
staff report does include traffic generation.
Commissioner Howe confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that traffic
generation may differ based on the number of theatre screens. Assistant City
Manager Hom explained that from an environmental standpoint the current impacts
are not more significant than previous assumptions since the current proposal
houses 1,800 seats and the original proposal housed 2,950 seats.
Commissioner Howe asked staff if the original project proposal contained a
restaurant. Assistant City Manager Hom advised the proposal would have mainly
evaluated the Downtown Specific Plan parameters and that range of available retail
uses.
Commissioner Howe stated an opinion that staff should consider specifying a
minimum number of screens to stay within the scope of the original Environmental
Impact Report.
Chair Harrison asked the applicant what enforcement exists for parking time limits.
Mr. Hunter advised enforcement would exist through policing and communication
with residents and clients.
Devang Bhuva, Sunnyvale resident, discussed his concerns with residential
parking and traffic impacts on Iowa Avenue.
Charles Keeler, Sunnyvale resident, discussed his concerns with traffic impacts on
Sunnyvale Avenue and Mathilda Avenue.
Chair Harrison commented that in 2017 6% of total parking must be allocated for
non-residential electric car charging in retail or commercial parking lots and asked
the applicant if they would object to 10%. Mr. Wood stated they are committed to
6% and are open to exploring an additional 4% on another parking level.
Chair Harrison closed the public hearing.
Vice Chair Rheaume commented that there are 924 parking spaces in Penney’s
Parking Structure and asked for staff comments on parking adequacy. Assistant
City of Sunnyvale Page 9
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
City Manager Hom explained that a shared parking analysis was conducted, which
concluded this parking will accommodate the mixed use project scope.
Assistant City Manager Hom mentioned that the applicant is working with the
Department of Public Works to analyze traffic calming measures, such as the
median installation and traffic signal modifications.
Vice Chair Rheaume confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that the parking
analysis was included in the 2007 project proposal. Assistant City Manager Hom
advised the current proposal is assumed to have a lessened traffic impact due to
reduction in the theatre’s seating capacity.
Vice Chair Rheaume confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that
neighborhoods within the City can apply for permit parking, as long as residents are
comfortable implementing a permit parking system.
Commissioner Simons noted there have been four potential changes in the
Conditions of Approval and asked for staff comments on increasing the percentage
of electric car charging spaces. Assistant City Manager Hom stated this could be
introduced as a condition in the Special Development Permit application.
Commissioner Simons suggested staff investigate the minimum number of screens
that would not trigger an Environmental Impact Report exemption. Assistant City
Manager Hom advised they can look at the previous assumption but that the 2003
Environmental Impact Report analysis most likely pertained to the Downtown
Specific Plan. Commissioner Simons and Assistant City Manager Hom agreed as
an alternative that staff work with the developer to determine the appropriate
minimum numbers of screens in order to minimize traffic impacts.
Commissioner Simons confirmed with Assistant City Manager Hom that additional
language can be added to the Conditions of Approval that relate to aesthetic
improvements for the service area, including landscape, surfaces and architectural
elements.
Commissioner Simons stated a concern about parking for the proposed housing
and requested staff work with the applicant to designate an appropriate location for
residential parking. Assistant City Manager Hom confirmed staff can review the
floor plans and that access may have been through Penney’s garage. Planning
Officer Miner commented that the project will be coming back to the Planning
Commission for review. Assistant City Manager Hom advised staff will research the
original site plan and provide an informational memo to the Planning Commission
outlining the parking as proposed in 2007.
City of Sunnyvale Page 10
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
MOTION: Commissioner Simons moved and Commissioner Howe seconded the
motion for Alternatives 1 and 3 – Find that the proposed architectural modifications
to Building T and the adjacent Penney’s Parking Structure of the Sunnyvale Town
Center project do not require additional environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the reasons stated in the staff report as the
proposed modifications are within the scope of the previous environmental analysis
for the Downtown Program Improvement Update, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15168(c)(2); approve Site Development Permit 2016-7968 with
modifications:
1. Total of 10% electric charging spots with distribution of the additional 4% to be
determined as appropriate;
2. Determine a minimum number of screens that is appropriate to minimize the
impact of traffic; and,
3. Require aesthetic improvements for the service area on Sunnyvale Avenue
including landscape, surfaces and architectural elements to avoid a dead zone.
Commissioner Simons added a fourth modification for staff to designate T1
parking, determine townhouse access from the street and confirm that no street
trees will be removed. Commissioner Simons discussed this fourth modification
with Assistant City Manager Hom agreed to omit it since it’s not a Condition of
Approval. Assistant City Manager Hom confirmed staff will complete research to
present to the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Howe commented that this project falls within the scope of the
previous approval and that the modifications do not require any additional CEQA.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Vice Chair Rheaume offered a friendly amendment to
elaborate in the Conditions of Approval on the removal of the temporary
construction fence and also add temporary landscaping in the setback area along
Iowa Avenue.
Assistant City Manager Hom advised that Condition of Approval A32 1g states the
removal of the temporary construction fence and this will be updated to include
temporary landscaping. Commissioner Simons and Commissioner Howe
accepted.
Chair Harrison noted that she will be supporting the motion, likes the tall cinema
sign and that the project is reminiscent of the Murphy Avenue time period.
The motion carried by the following vote:
City of Sunnyvale Page 11
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
Yes: 6 - Chair Harrison
Vice Chair Rheaume
Commissioner Howe
Commissioner Melton
Commissioner Simons
Commissioner Weiss
No: 0
Absent: 1 - Commissioner Olevson
4. 16-1079 File #: 2013-7609
Locations: 615, 629, 689, 691 N. Mathilda Ave., 525, 535, 555 Del
Rey Ave., 650 Vaqueros Ave. (APNs: 165-43-014, -023 through -029)
Zoning: PPSP/IEF
Proposed Project: PEERY PARK PLAN REVIEW to redevelop 8
parcels by combining the site into one 7.5-acre site and construct two
new 4-story office R&D buildings with a total of 330,668 s.f. (includes
13,988 s.f. amenities area) resulting in 100% FAR, and serviced by a
new 5-level parking garage. The project is located in the Peery Park
Specific Plan area.
Applicant / Owner: Sequoia Del Ray LLC. / Sequoia Del Ray LLC
Environmental Review: The project is exempt from additional CEQA
review per CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c)(2), (3) and (4). The
project is within the scope of the Peery Park Specific Plan Program
EIR. The environmental impacts associated with the proposed
development are adequately addressed and analyzed in the Peery
Park Specific Plan Program EIR and/or can be substantially mitigated
with the imposition of uniformly applied development policies and
standards.
Project Planner: Shetal Divatia, (408) 730-7637,
sdivatia@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Senior Planner Shetal Divatia presented the staff report.
Commissioner Melton commented that in regards to over the air TV signals it
seems that the available recommendations provide conflicting information.
Commissioner Melton noted that the City Manager put forth a treatise on TV signals
earlier this year and that a study issue was brought up, but not seconded, during
the last City Council meeting. Planning Officer Miner advised that the City Manager
had put forth documentation about this issue which included staff research and it
concluded that many different factors can affect over the air TV signals. Planning
Officer Miner commented that the City doesn’t have a policy for this issue and the
project meets the intent of the Peery Park Specific Plan.
City of Sunnyvale Page 12
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
Commissioner Weiss stated there was an inconsistency in the parking numbers
since the variance proposed 966 parking spaces but page 15 in Attachment 5
indicates 1,018 parking spaces. Senior Planner Divatia confirmed that 966 parking
spaces is correct and Attachment 5 will be updated.
Commissioner Weiss confirmed with Senior Planner Divatia and Planning Officer
Miner that BP 21 of Attachment 4 is a boilerplate condition and it would be fine to
remove this section.
Commissioner Weiss commented that the HOA on pages 28 and 29 is also a
boilerplate condition and that it may not be accurate to use boilerplate conditions.
Planning Officer Miner responded that the goal is to define all the potential control
uses of the property and this doesn’t necessarily make it inaccurate.
Commissioner Weiss asked staff if Table 7.16-2 in Attachment 5 was part of the
county study for 2040. Principal Transportation Engineer/Planner Carol Shariat
advised that “existing” refers to the initial count for the Peery Park Specific Plan and
“plus project” refers to adding the Mathilda Commons project to the existing
volumes. Principal Transportation Engineer/Planner Shariat confirmed that this
data is current.
Commissioner Howe clarified with Senior Planner Divatia the square footage
outlined in sheet 7.4 of the site plan.
Planning Officer Miner commented that the area along the terrace between the
street and parking garage will be maintained for people to congregate and it will be
publicly accessible.
Chair Harrison opened the public hearing.
Applicant Pete Larko, representing Sequoia Del Ray LLC, presented information
about the proposed project.
Architect Craig Almeleh, representing ARC TEC, presented images and information
about the proposed project.
Commissioner Weiss commented that she likes the use of the aluminum composite
panels and asked Mr. Almeleh if the amenities floors were all outside. Mr. Almeleh
explained that there is both indoor and outdoor space on level three and level five
has amenities behind the stairwell.
City of Sunnyvale Page 13
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
Commissioner Weiss discussed with Mr. Almeleh the materials used for the
balconies and guardrails and confirmed that the area is intended for maintenance,
not assembly.
Commissioner Simons asked Landscape Architect Paul Lettieri about the majority
of types of trees that would be planted in the front and their adult heights. Mr.
Lettieri advised that the two major street trees will be Circus Rejudiana trees,
growing 60-80 feet, and Pistache trees that will have moderate heights.
Commissioner Simons commented that large significant trees in front would
integrate with an urban forest look and feel and asked Mr. Lettieri if he would
consider estate sized tree surrounding the building. Mr. Lettieri advised the street
trees are city mandated but there is flexibility with the remaining trees.
Chair Harrison clarified with Mr. Almeleh that the buses are intended to transport
employees between buildings in adjacent cities and would likely only be available
for internal employee use, not adjacent companies. Chair Harrison clarified with
Planning Officer Miner that this shuttle is not anticipated to be a stop for the Peery
Park Rides shuttle service.
Ken Kunishige, Sunnyvale resident, discussed his concerns with television
reception.
Commissioner Melton commented that subsequent speakers, if possible, should
address how the required findings are met or not met with regards to over the air
TV signals.
Cathryn Floyd, Sunnyvale resident, discussed her concerns with traffic and the
impact on Mathilda Avenue.
Francis Schmidt, Sunnyvale resident, discussed his concerns with traffic, storm
drainage, the environmental impact of adding a four story building, and utility gas
venting.
Jim Quaderer, Sunnyvale resident and SNAIL TV Reception Committee Chair,
discussed his concerns with television reception.
Chiaki Quaderer, Sunnyvale resident, discussed her concerns with blinds, visible
signage and the need for a policy regarding over the air TV signals.
Ann Davis, Sunnyvale resident, discussed her concerns with window reflections,
City of Sunnyvale Page 14
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
enforcement of window shades, visible signage, and mitigation of construction.
Diane Gleason, SNAIL representative, discussed her concerns with window
reflections, the visual impact of four story buildings, and over the air TV signals.
John Cordes, member of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission,
discussed his concerns with visible signage, and over the air TV signals.
Mr. Larko commented that one speaker in the public hearing stated that sometimes
the over the air signals work and sometimes they don’t, so it would be arbitrary to
speculate on the project’s impact. Mr. Larko stated they are amenable to
implementing blinds on the third floor and prohibiting visible signage on the skyline.
Chair Harrison closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Simons asked staff if repeaters had been evaluated as a solution for
the potential loss in over the air TV signals. Planning Officer Miner advised that an
engineer in the field had been consulted on this option, who advised repeaters can
actually cause more problems.
Commissioner Simons confirmed with Planning Officer Miner that the applicant
stated they would not implement rooftop signage. Planning Officer Miner explained
that sign code stipulates that signs can’t be lit between 10 PM – 7 AM within 150
feet of residential property but the closest property is 220 feet in this project.
Planning Officer Miner commented that the applicant would still be required to
provide technology to minimize lighting and glare.
Vice Chair Rheaume confirmed with Planning Officer Miner that city street trees
would be chosen from the available palette, including the city street tree choice for
the median.
Commissioner Melton confirmed with Planning Officer Miner that the decision of the
Planning Commission tonight is final unless appealed.
Commissioner Melton asked for staff comments on storm drainage and natural gas
venting issues raised by Mr. Schmidt. Planning Officer Miner advised that natural
gas venting is not within the City of Sunnyvale’s jurisdiction and that one finding in
the EIR is that the project reduces impervious surfaces so the runoff is
comparatively reduced.
Chair Harrison confirmed with Planning Officer Miner that sewer pipe diameters will
increase as defined in the Peery Park Specific Plan but there are no anticipated
City of Sunnyvale Page 15
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
changes to storm drain infrastructure.
Chair Harrison asked Planning Officer Miner to give a synopsis of what measures
in Peery Park Specific Plan will help mitigate traffic. Planning Officer Miner advised
that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was compiled for the entire area plan
and all proposed projects are compared to ascertain if any impacts were not
addressed or are greater than was what addressed in the Peery Park Specific Plan
EIR. Planning Officer Miner stated that for this project no additional impacts were
determined and no impacts were greater than in the Peery Park Specific Plan EIR.
Planning Officer Miner explained that that there are standard requirements for a
30% trip reduction through a Traffic Demand Management (TDM) program and that
the Peery Park Rides will create a new shuttle service for Peery Park, residential
areas and the CalTrain station to help mitigate traffic. Planning Officer Miner stated
the goal is to have a standard route during peak transit hours and on call service at
other times.
Chair Harrison confirmed with Planning Officer Miner that the applicant will pay
over $5 million in fees, with a traffic fair share contribution of $450,000 and traffic
mitigation of $251,000.
Chair Harrison asked staff if light reflection was included in bird safe designs.
Planning Officer Miner advised that light reflection is a key component in bird safety
guidelines and trees should be planted 15 feet away from the buildings to allow
safe space for birds.
Chair Harrison asked for staff comments on reflections into the neighborhood due
to the morning sun. Planning Officer Miner stated that the building includes solid
structures and non-reflective materials to break up the building’s reflective quality.
MOTION: Vice Chair Rheaume moved and Commissioner Howe seconded the
motion for Alternative 2 - make the required Findings to approve the CEQA
determination that the project is within the scope of the Peery Park Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report (PPSP - EIR) and no additional environmental review
is required; and approve the Peery Park Plan Review Permit subject to PPSP
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in Attachment 6 and modified
conditions of approval as noted by the Planning Commission:
1. The applicant provides blinds for the 3rd and 4th floors;
2. No corporate signage be used above the second floor; and,
3. Staff works with the Department of Public Works to consider using evergreen
height trees in the median and the East side of Mathilda Avenue to block light and
City of Sunnyvale Page 16
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
reflection to the SNAIL neighborhood.
Vice Chair Rheaume commented that this is a good project with a unique design,
he appreciates the applicant’s collaboration with staff and the neighbors and is glad
they chose not to build to six stories.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Commissioner Simons offered a friendly amendment for
the landscaping on site – that excluding the mandated city tree selection, estate
sized genetic trees be included into the landscape plans surrounding the project
edge for privacy/urban forest issues/Sunnyvale character with a preference for
appropriate natives. Vice Chair Rheaume and Commissioner Howe accepted.
Commissioner Simons noted he will support the project and hoped in the future a
determination would be made as to how to handle the interference with over the air
TV signals.
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT: Commissioner Weiss offered a friendly amendment to
request staff facilitate continuing discussions between the developer/tenants and
neighborhood residents to ameliorate the situation of OTA TV as it may develop.
Vice Chair Rheaume asked for staff comments on the friendly amendment.
Planning Officer Miner commented that there was discussion in March 2015 over
these signals and while the City participated and continues to cooperate with the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the City Manager’s direction is for
the City to provide support but not take a leadership role.
Commissioner Weiss noted concern that residents may hesitate to approach the
developer and asked staff if the City could serve as a liaison. Planning Officer
Miner advised the City could play a role but doesn’t have the authority to do so and
the discussion should involve just the two parties. Planning Officer Miner confirmed
that Senior Planner Divatia is the point person for residential contact.
Vice Chair Rheaume respectfully declined the friendly amendment.
Commissioner Melton commented that he loves the design and parcel aggregation
and will be supporting the motion. Commissioner Melton thanked the neighbors
and stated he appreciates the applicant’s response to Planning Commissioner
comments during the study session. Commissioner Melton noted he can make the
findings and advised residents to review and pursue Recommended Finding 6 for
the over the air TV signals issue. Commissioner Melton advised residents to
contact City Council for potential study issues. Commissioner Melton commented
City of Sunnyvale Page 17
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
on the progress that will be made in the neighborhood from mitigation measures
such as the shuttle service.
Chair Harrison commented that she will support the motion, appreciates the
building design, shuttle service and mitigation of the reflective quality of the
building. Chair Harrison noted that the applicant will pay more to be part of the
Peery Park Specific Plan and as such has chosen to contribute to the
neighborhood.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 6 - Chair Harrison
Vice Chair Rheaume
Commissioner Howe
Commissioner Melton
Commissioner Simons
Commissioner Weiss
No: 0
Absent: 1 - Commissioner Olevson
5. 16-1117 File #: 2016-7127
Location: 760 E El Camino Real (APN: 211-25-044)
Zoning: C-2/ECR
Proposed Project: Appeal of decision by the Director of Community
Development approving a Miscellaneous Plan Permit for architectural,
lighting, landscaping, and parking lot modifications for New Seasons
Market within an existing commercial retail site.
Appellant/Applicant/Owner: Protect Our Sunnyvale/LRS
Architects/Ramco IL, Inc.
Environmental Review: Categorically Exempt Class 1
Staff Contact: Ryan Kuchenig, (408) 730-7431,
rkuchenig@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Senior Planner Ryan Kuchenig presented the staff report.
Commissioner Melton confirmed with Senior Planner Kuchenig that the decision of
the Planning Commission is final.
Commissioner Melton confirmed with Senior Planner Kuchenig that the signage
shown in the plans is subject to a sign permit review, which is appealable to the
Planning Commission.
Commissioner Melton asked staff to explain why reconfiguration of the main
entrance to the north side was infeasible and how this conclusion was reached.
City of Sunnyvale Page 18
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
Senior Planner Kuchenig stated it would have required a redevelopment due to the
fire lane, which is beyond the project’s scope, and that the main entrance was
moved to the corner as a compromise with community input. Planning Officer Miner
advised that a row or more of parking would be required to be removed in order to
shift the fire lane towards El Camino Real, which goes beyond reuse of the existing
building.
Commissioner Melton confirmed with Senior Planner Kuchenig that the Special
Development Permit (SDP) was approved in 2004 by the City Council and that the
Planning Commission’s role is to review the appeal of the Miscellaneous Plan
Permit (MPP), not the SDP.
Commissioner Melton confirmed with Senior Planner Kuchenig that the City Council
made the finding in 2004 that the project would not impair the orderly development
or existing uses of adjacent properties. Commissioner Melton confirmed with
Senior Planner Kuchenig the Planning Commission is bounded not to take any
action that would increase impairment of the orderly development or existing uses
of adjacent properties.
Commissioner Weiss asked staff if the El Camino Real Precise Plan would take
precedence as it relates to increasing the attractiveness and accessibility for
pedestrian access, considering the project’s parking proximity to the sidewalk.
Planning Officer Miner advised that most of the project’s improvements were
internal and that you have to weigh the project’s scope against additional
improvements. Senior Assistant City Attorney Rebecca Moon commented that the
grocery store is allowed by the zoning, that the project is similar to a design review
and the reason for the MPP is due to the minor exterior changes. Senior Assistant
City Attorney Moon noted it may not be within the Planning Commission’s purview
to ask for changes beyond what the applicant’s request.
Commissioner Weiss confirmed with Senior Planner Kuchenig that the shopping
cart locations are towards the front on the East side and also within the parking lot.
Senior Planner Kuchenig advised the shopping cart locations are 80 feet from the
residences.
Commissioner Weiss confirmed with Senior Planner Kuchenig that the Planning
Commission could modify the Conditions of Approval in order to limit delivery
hours.
Chair Harrison opened the public hearing.
City of Sunnyvale Page 19
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
Appellant Jorge Moreno, representing Protect Our Sunnyvale LRS, discussed his
concerns with traffic, sufficient parking, and impact of the delivery trucks.
Applicants Jerry Chevassus and Sarah Owens presented information about the
proposed project.
Commissioner Simons asked the applicant if they had considered moving the deli
seating towards the front. Scott Jackson, LRS Architect, advised they did examine
that possibility but the existing fire lane took up the necessary space.
Commissioner Simons asked the applicant to explain why this site was chosen and
Mr. Chevassus advised that they are branching out into more suburban markets
and the best development is to reuse, rather than rebuild. Mr. Chevassus also
noted that the size and demographics of the site were well suited to their business.
Commissioner Simons commented that the site has been landscaped for parking
and asked for applicant comments on the selected trees, which may hide the
signage. Mr. Jackson explained that the street and interior trees will screen the
building and the signage will align with the drive access.
Commissioner Weiss confirmed with Ms. Owens that the store will have a green
team which will focus on waste management and recycling.
Commissioner Weiss asked the applicant if they mainly hire full time or part time
employees. Forrest Gonsiewski advised both but that the majority of staff will most
likely be part time employees.
Commissioner Weiss asked the applicant if they would have union workers in their
store. Senior Assistant City Attorney Moon stated this is beyond the scope of the
project to inquire about labor practices.
Commissioner Melton confirmed with the applicant that the signage is neon and
asked that they cooperate with staff during the sign review permit process, in order
to accommodate any neighborhood concerns.
Commissioner Melton asked the applicant if they would be amenable to modifying
the delivery hours. Mr. Gonsiewski advised there are different agreements based
each store and Ms. Owens stated they could modify the hours as long as all
deliveries can still be completed. Commissioner Melton confirmed with Ms. Owens
that they would be willing to work with modified delivery hours of 8 AM – 8 PM.
Planning Officer Miner commented that the applicant can apply for a MPP, should
City of Sunnyvale Page 20
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
they need the delivery window modified in the future.
Louise Miller, speaking on behalf of Josephine Gembald, discussed her concerns
with noise, trees, light emitted from signage and electric chargers. Ms. Miller
expressed appreciation for New Seasons Market’s collaboration with residents.
Commissioner Simons asked for clarification on the tree issue and Ms. Miller
advised trees have been removed without being replaced and that improved
landscape maintenance is needed.
The Appellant discussed his concerns with allocation of parking, impact on traffic
and truck deliveries.
Chair Harrison closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Howe noted that Attachment 4 references a “healthy condition with
proper irrigation and fertilization” and asked staff if there was an irrigation plan
associated with the original City Council approval. Senior Planner Kuchenig
advised this is a new condition required for the MPP but that there was an original
landscape plan.
Commissioner Howe asked staff how this permit changes the original condition.
Senior Planner Kuchenig noted that the change adds support to the original
condition and that additional language was added due to neighborhood concerns to
ensure proper maintenance.
Commissioner Howe asked staff to explain the current condition of the buffer area.
Senior Planner Kuchenig stated there are enforcement concerns with regards to
landscaping and it will have to be brought up to proper maintenance.
MOTION: Commissioner Melton moved and Commissioner Simons seconded the
motion for Alternative 2 – find that the action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines 15301, deny the appeal, and approve the Miscellaneous Plan
Permit with modifications - modify the delivery hours (GC-9) to 8 AM – 8 PM.
Commissioner Melton thanked the applicant for their interest in this site and asked
they keep neighborhood concerns in mind as the project moves forward.
Commissioner Melton commented that the Planning Commission’s role is only to
provide a design review of the exterior architecture and that the City is working to
mitigate traffic congestion. Commissioner Melton stated he appreciates
Commissioner Howe’s comments on bolstering irrigation along the buffer area.
City of Sunnyvale Page 21
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - Revised December 5, 2016
Commissioner Melton noted that he appreciates the elements that were
incorporated in the style of the Libby’s Water Tower.
Commissioner Simons commented he will be supporting the motion and
appreciates that all issues were already addressed. Commissioner Simons advised
staff that this parking lot uses genetically short trees which hide the retail space
and that trees should be taller than the signage.
Commissioner Weiss stated it is important to improve sections of El Camino Real
by following the El Camino Real Precise Plan and this store layout will not make the
area more pedestrian friendly. Commissioner Weiss commented that she cannot
make the findings and will not be supporting the motion.
Chair Harrison confirmed that Commissioner Melton’s motion was for Alternative 2.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Yes: 5 - Chair Harrison
Vice Chair Rheaume
Commissioner Howe
Commissioner Melton
Commissioner Simons
No: 1 - Commissioner Weiss
Absent: 1 - Commissioner Olevson
Planning Officer Miner stated this decision is final.
STANDING ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL STUDY ISSUES
NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND COMMENTS
-Commissioner Comments
-Staff Comments
Planning Officer Miner commented that December 12th will be the final Planning
Commission meeting for 2016.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Harrison adjourned the meeting at 11:38 PM.
City of Sunnyvale Page 22
Agenda
City of Sunnyvale
Notice and Agenda - Final
Planning Commission
Monday, December 5, 2016 7:00 PM Council Chambers and West Conference
Room, City Hall, 456 W. Olive Ave.,
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Study Session Cancelled | Special Meeting - Public Hearing 7 PM
6 P.M. STUDY SESSION CANCELLED
7 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
Call to Order in the Council Chambers
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
ROLL CALL
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This category provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the
commission on items not listed on the agenda and is limited to 15 minutes (may
be extended or continued after the public hearings/general business section of the
agenda at the discretion of the Chair) with a maximum of up to three minutes per
speaker. Please note the Brown Act (Open Meeting Law) does not allow
commissioners to take action on an item not listed on the agenda. If you wish to
address the commission, please complete a speaker card and give it to the
Recording Secretary. Individuals are limited to one appearance during this
section.
CONSENT CALENDAR
None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS/GENERAL BUSINESS
City of Sunnyvale Page 1 Printed on 12/2/2016
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final December 5, 2016
2. 16-1080 FILE #: 2016-7944
Location: 225 S. Taaffe Street (Block 18 of Downtown Specific Plan
bounded by Mathilda, Washington, Sunnyvale and Iowa Avenues)
Proposed Project: Adopt the Tenant Design Guidelines for storefront
design, commercial signage and tenant improvements for retail uses
within the Sunnyvale Town Center project
Applicant/Owner: STC Venture LLC (applicant/owner)
Environmental Review: No additional environmental review is
necessary; the adoption of the proposed Tenant Design Guidelines is
within the scope of the previous environmental analysis for the Downtown
Program Improvement Update, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15168(c)(2) and is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15305.
Staff Contact: Hanson Hom, (408) 730-7450, hhom@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Recommendation: Alternative 1 and 2: Find that the adoption of the proposed
Tenant Design Guidelines is categorically exempt from
environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15305, and none of the exceptions to the exemptions specified
in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 have occurred, and that
no additional environmental review is necessary as the
proposed amendments are within the scope of the previous
environmental analysis for the Downtown Program
Improvement Update, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15168(c)(2); and approve the Sunnyvale Town Center Tenant
Design Guidelines.
City of Sunnyvale Page 2 Printed on 12/2/2016
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final December 5, 2016
3. 16-1115 FILE #: 2016-7968
Location: 150 E. McKinley Avenue and 330 S. Murphy Avenue; APNs:
209-35-014 and 209-35-015 (Block 5 of the Sunnyvale Town Center
project bounded by McKinley, Sunnyvale, Iowa and Murphy Avenues)
Proposed Project:
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT to modify the architectural
design plans for the two-story cinema/retail building (“Building T”)
and the adjacent public parking garage (“Penney’s Parking
Structure”) of the Sunnyvale Town Center project from the original
plans approved on August 13, 2007 (SDP 2007-0516).
Applicant/Owner: STC Venture LLC (applicant/owner)
Environmental Review: No additional environmental review is
necessary; the proposed architectural modifications to Building T and
the Penney’s Structure are within the scope of the previous
environmental analysis for the Downtown Program Improvement Update,
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2).
Staff Contact: Hanson Hom, (408) 730-7450, hhom@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Recommendation: Alternative 1 and 2: Find that the proposed architectural
modifications to Building T and the Penney's Parking Structure
of the Sunnyvale Town Center project do not require
additional environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the reasons stated in
the staff report as the proposed modifications are within the
scope of the previous environmental analysis for the
Downtown Program Improvement Update, pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2); and approve Site
Development Permit 2016-7968 for architectural modifications
to Building T and the Penney's Parking Structure with the
attached findings and conditions of approval.
City of Sunnyvale Page 3 Printed on 12/2/2016
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final December 5, 2016
4. 16-1079 File #: 2013-7609
Locations: 615, 629, 689, 691 N. Mathilda Ave., 525, 535, 555 Del Rey
Ave., 650 Vaqueros Ave. (APNs: 165-43-014, -023 through -029)
Zoning: PPSP/IEF
Proposed Project: PEERY PARK PLAN REVIEW to redevelop 8
parcels by combining the site into one 7.5-acre site and construct two
new 4-story office R&D buildings with a total of 330,668 s.f. (includes
13,988 s.f. amenities area) resulting in 100% FAR, and serviced by a
new 5-level parking garage. The project is located in the Peery Park
Specific Plan area.
Applicant / Owner: Sequoia Del Ray LLC. / Sequoia Del Ray LLC
Environmental Review: The project is exempt from additional CEQA
review per CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c)(2), (3) and (4). The
project is within the scope of the Peery Park Specific Plan Program EIR.
The environmental impacts associated with the proposed development
are adequately addressed and analyzed in the Peery Park Specific Plan
Program EIR and/or can be substantially mitigated with the imposition of
uniformly applied development policies and standards .
Project Planner: Shetal Divatia, (408) 730-7637,
sdivatia@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Recommendation: Alternative 1: Make the required Findings to approve the
CEQA determination that the project is within the scope of the
Peery Park Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
and no additional environmental review is required; and
approve the Peery Park Plan Review Permit subject to PPSP
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in Attachment 6
and recommended conditions of approval noted in Attachment
4.
City of Sunnyvale Page 4 Printed on 12/2/2016
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final December 5, 2016
5. 16-1117 File #: 2016-7127
Location: 760 E El Camino Real (APN: 211-25-044)
Zoning: C-2/ECR
Proposed Project: Appeal of decision by the Director of Community
Development approving a Miscellaneous Plan Permit for architectural,
lighting, landscaping, and parking lot modifications for New Seasons
Market within an existing commercial retail site.
Appellant/Applicant/Owner: Protect Our Sunnyvale/LRS
Architects/Ramco IL, Inc.
Environmental Review: Categorically Exempt Class 1
Staff Contact: Ryan Kuchenig, (408) 730-7431,
rkuchenig@sunnyvale.ca.gov
Recommendation: Alternative 1. Find that the action is exempt from CEQA
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15301, deny the appeal, and
approve the Miscellaneous Plan Permit with recommended
Findings in Attachment 3 and Conditions in Attachment 4.
STANDING ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL STUDY ISSUES
NON-AGENDA ITEMS AND COMMENTS
-Commissioner Comments
-Staff Comments
City of Sunnyvale Page 5 Printed on 12/2/2016
Planning Commission Notice and Agenda - Final December 5, 2016
ADJOURNMENT
Any agenda related writings or documents distributed to members of the Planning
Commission regarding any open session item on this agenda will be made
available for public inspection in the Planning Division office located at 456 W.
Olive Ave., Sunnyvale CA 94086 during normal business hours, and in the Council
Chambers on the evening of the Planning Commission meeting pursuant to
Government Code §54957.5.
Agenda information is available by contacting Katherine Hall at (408) 730-7440.
Agendas and associated reports are also available on the City’s website at
sunnyvale.ca.gov or at the Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W. Olive Ave.,
Sunnyvale, 72 hours before the meeting.
Planning a presentation for a Planning Commission meeting?
To help you prepare and deliver your public comments, please review the "Making
Public Comments During City Council or Planning Commission Meetings"
document available at Presentations.inSunnyvale.com.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that if you file a lawsuit challenging any final decision on
any public hearing item listed in this agenda, the issues in the lawsuit may be
limited to the issues which were raised at the public hearing or presented in
writing to the City at or before the public hearing.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6
imposes a 90-day deadline for the filing of any lawsuit challenging final action on
an agenda item which is subject to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance in
this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (408) 730-7440. Notification
of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (29 CFR 35.106 ADA Title II)
City of Sunnyvale Page 6 Printed on 12/2/2016
Get email alerts for Sunnyvale
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.