Plan Commission (Meets 2nd Tuesday of each month at 5:00 p.m.)
Regular MeetingSuperior, WI · April 20, 2022
Minutes
PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF SUPERIOR
Wednesday, April 20, 2022
The Plan Commission Meeting for the City of Superior was called to order by Mayor Paine at
4:00 p.m. in Board Room 201.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Mayor Jim Paine, Tylor Elm, Lindsey Graskey, Brent Fennessey, Brian
Finstad, Anne Porter, Dave Strum, Garner Moffat
Members excused: Dennis Dalbec
Staff present: Jason Serck, Allison Johnson
Others present: Shelley Nelson, Frog Prell
There being a quorum present, the meeting was in order.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Fennessey, seconded by Elm, and carried to unanimously
approve the minutes of March 16, 2022.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Review and approval of an ordinance allowing mixed-use developments in Manufacturing
Districts
Economic Development, Planning & Port Director Serck explained that the ordinance change
would allow for mixed-use development in our manufacturing districts which includes a
large portion of the north end downtown district. Serck elaborated that there is a project
proposed for a property in this district, that would be a great fit for the area and has a
residential component too it, so making this change would allow for this and future projects
to be developed. Commissioner Finstad agreed with the mixed-use requirement for parcels
along Tower Avenue corridor but wouldn’t be opposed to allowed just residential
development elsewhere in the zoning district. Commissioner Elm asked if it would be safe,
appropriate, or responsible to have residential built close to ore docks or some of the larger
manufacturing facilities. Serck clarified that it likely wouldn’t be a problem and would
“self-regulate” as developers would likely not consider those locations based on desirability,
and potential contamination of soils disallowing residential developments. Commissioner
Strum questioned why “4-units” was specified and why it couldn’t be less units to allow for
redevelopment of some existing properties that aren’t large enough for 4-units.
Commissioner Moffat expressed concerns with allowing residential uses in the M2 – Heavy
Manufacturing district, explaining that these areas allow for heavier uses that are generally
not healthy to live near, nor are they pedestrian friendly or have the infrastructure (sidewalks,
etc.) to support residential uses. Serck discussed the few areas in the city zoned M2 and that
it’s likely that residential wouldn’t be built in the areas anyway, so removing residential from
this district wouldn’t hinder future developments. The focus area for this zoning change
would be directed at the north end downtown district currently zoned M1 – Light
Manufacturing.
Commissioner Strum reiterated his concerns about the minimum number of required
dwelling units and suggested it should be less to allow more flexibility for redevelopment of
existing locations in the district that aren’t large enough to accommodate four dwelling units
on the upper floor(s). Commissioner Porter suggested just simply removing any limit on the
number of dwelling units to allow for someone to develop or redevelop a storefront that only
has one large dwelling occupying the upper floor(s).
MOTION by Commissioner Elm, seconded by Graskey, and carried to unanimously
approve ordinance allowing mixed-use developments in Manufacturing Districts.
MOTION by Commissioner Moffat, seconded by Finstad, and carried to amend the
ordinance language to read “Sec. 122-558 537. Permitted Uses” effectively placing it in M1
– Manufacturing Light District, as opposed to M2 – Manufacturing Heavy.
MOTION by Commissioner Strum, seconded by Elm, and failed to amend the ordinance
language to read “Where at least four two dwelling units comprise the residential
component.”
MOTION by Commissioner Porter, seconded by Elm, and carried to amend the ordinance
language to read “Mixed-use development. Where at least four dwelling units comprise the
residential component.”
2. Review and approval of draft language for creating a special use permit regarding the usage
of drive-through speakers adjacent to residentially used or zoned properties.
Commissioner Finstad supplied some background on the request to regulate drive-through
speakers based on concerns surrounding some existing drive-through restaurants, which have
caused a noise nuisance in the city. He used an example of a restaurant that made promises
to area neighbors to mitigate light and sound pollution from their drive-through, however
once they received their approvals the did not follow through with the mitigation. Creating a
special use permit would allow the City the ability to regulate drive-through requirements to
alleviate more future disruptions for residences living near them.
Serck explained the draft language presented and expanded that focusing on drive-through
times and measured distances to residential properties could be a good direction to take to
allow both business flexibility and preserve the residential properties in the area.
Commissioner Elm asked if this would be for new businesses only, or retroactive. That
distinction would need to be decided when drafting and approving the special use permit
ordinance. Commissioner Moffat brought of light pollution concerns as well as the speaker
volume concerns and would like that to be addressed in the special use permit.
Serck clarified that the current zoning code has some robust language for screening,
buffering, landscaping and lighting requirements for commercial properties abutting
Plan Commission
April 20, 2022
residential districts which is strictly followed, however most of these businesses were in
place prior to the buffering code being in place. Serck added that some of these concerns
could also be addressed just by reaching out to current restaurant owners and having them
address some of the light concerns and potentially their buffering requirements.
Paine suggested holding the item in committee while staff prepares language to present at the
next meeting to address the discussion held today.
3. Discussion on allowing gun sales in C2 – Highway Commercial District through a
special use permit
Commissioner Fennessey explained that an auction business recently relocated to a C2 –
Highway Commercial zoning district which now disallows them to sell firearms at their auctions
because the sale of firearms is not allowed in this zoning district. Fennessey is requesting that a
special use permit be created that allows for the sale of firearms in C2 district, and possibly
places a limit to the number days per year or month on when they can be sold. Serck added that
a special use permit could be created, or that an ordinance change could be made to allow for
firearm sales in the C2 district. Commissioner Moffat supported creating a special use permit
rather than an ordinance change because it allows the city more control in regulating the number
establishments allowed to sell firearms.
Paine suggested holding the item in committee while the planning department drafts language for
both a special use permit and draft language for an ordinance change to present at the next
meeting.
OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted by:
Allison Johnson
Planning Technician
City of Superior
Plan Commission
April 20, 2022
Get email alerts for Superior
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.