Plan Commission (Meets 2nd Tuesday of each month at 5:00 p.m.)
Regular MeetingSuperior, WI · May 18, 2022
Minutes
PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF SUPERIOR
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
The Plan Commission Meeting for the City of Superior was called to order by Mayor Paine at
4:00 p.m. in Board Room 201.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Mayor Jim Paine, Tylor Elm, Lindsey Graskey, Brent Fennessey, Brian
Finstad, Anne Porter, Dave Strum, Garner Moffat, Dennis Dalbec
Members excused: Staff present: Jason Serck, Allison Johnson, Steph Becken
Others present: Shelley Nelson, Pat Kukell, Councilor Van Sickle, Councilor Ludwig, Rachel
Wagner
There being a quorum present, the meeting was in order.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Fennessey, seconded by Elm, and carried to unanimously
approve the minutes of April 20, 2022.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Sam Rothstein’s request to submit a Certified Survey Map for property located at 10
Belknap Shores. CSM 22-01
Economic Development, Planning & Port Director Serck explained that this property, located
on the west end of Belknap Street in Billings Park, currently known as the Wessman Estate,
will be subdivided into three parcels. One parcel will be the remaining home, and two others
will be created and sold as developable parcels. The terrain and nature of the neighborhood
limits much more subdivision than the three total lots proposed.
MOTION by Commissioner Dalbec, seconded by Elm, and carried to unanimously approve
Sam Rothstein’s request to submit a Certified Survey Map for property located at 10
Belknap Shores.
2. Administrative request to submit a Certified Survey Map for property located on
Wisconsin Point Road. CSM 22-02
Serck reminded commissioners of the work Councilor Van Sickle and staff have done over
the past several months to work towards establishing boundaries of known burial grounds
and transferring land to the Fond Du Lac Tribal community. The land on Wisconsin Point is
a well know designated native burial ground and the CSM is needed to describe and deed
over the land.
MOTION by Commissioner Fennessey, seconded by Dalbec, and carried to unanimously
approve Administrative request to submit a Certified Survey Map for property located on
Wisconsin Point Road.
3. Administrative request to submit a Certified Survey Map for property located within the
St. Francis Cemetery off 31st Avenue East. CSM 22-03
Serck added that this specific CSM was for land located in the St. Francis Cemetery and that
both the County and St. Francis have been involved and support the land transfer to Fond Du
Lac. A street vacation was recently completed to provide access to the burial grounds.
MOTION by Commissioner Dalbec, seconded by Graskey, and carried to unanimously
approve Administrative request to submit a Certified Survey Map for property located
within the St. Francis Cemetery off 31st Avenue East.
There being no objection by the Commissioners, agenda items 7 & 8 were moved up on the
agenda and reviewed next.
7. Review and approval of an ordinance allowing firearm sales in C2 – Highway
Commercial District
Pat Kukell, owner of Superior Shooters Supply in Superior spoke in favor of the ordinance
change because it opens up opportunities for their relocation to another storefront in town.
Without the ordinance change their options for locations are very limited.
Serck explained that the ordinance would place firearm sales as an allowable use in our C2 –
Highway Commercial District. Commissioner Moffat expressed a concern with allowing them
with no other restrictions in place and would prefer a special use permit.
MOTION by Commissioner Fennessey, seconded by Dalbec, and carried to approve of an
ordinance allowing firearm sales in C2 – Highway Commercial District. Yays-8, nays-1
(Moffat)
8. Review and approval of an ordinance creating a special use permit identifying
regulations for drive-through speaker usage.
Serck explained the ordinance proposed, the buffering requirements and also the special use
permit state statute which actually does not hold much power anymore because of recent changes
to the law at a state level. Serck suggested placing the new ordinance language in the City’s
zoning code in the landscape and buffering section as a standalone ordinance rather than a SUP.
The review and approval of projects through the building permitting process would provide
enough oversight and opportunity to deny permits, if applicants did not meet the code
requirements. Serck is not suggesting that the code be retroactive at this time.
Strum questioned if our code made any reference to noise disturbances from private residential
contractors, and if it was appropriate to restrict commercial noise if it is the same or less
disruptive. Serck and Mayor clarified there is no written code defining times for contractors to
work, other than common sense and courtesy, but Mayor added that type of work is temporary
whereas a commercial business would pose a constant disturbance.
Plan Commission
May 18, 2022
Commissioner Porter brought up that the speaker direction can have a large impact on sound
travel and suggested having the speaker orientation face away from residential structures where
possible.
Commissioner Fennessey wondered if the City should regulate hours if the business has made
every possible mitigation to ensure there is no impact to area neighbors. Paine clarified that
anyone could file an appeal at the plan commission or council level if they have support from a
councilor to do so and in those specific situations, they would have the opportunity to prove their
mitigation efforts would not adversely affect neighbors.
Commissioner Elm and Moffat expressed a concern that the wording of “may not” is not strong
enough and provide a leeway for businesses and suggested using the phrasing “shall not.”
Commissioner Fennessey reiterated the question of whether or not this would be retroactive and
if it only applies to new construction. Serck confirmed that it would only apply to new
construction and that every new business he speaks to already asks about our drive-through
regulations, so this ordinance change will not come as a shock to them. Businesses are used to it
from working in other municipalities.
Commissioner Porter questioned the language use of “encouraged” and expressed that it was not
strong enough and businesses could completely disregard the statement. Serck added that
buffering requirements are already enforced, so it could be redundant. Mayor suggested
removing the statement altogether, and Moffat followed-up by suggesting that it be left to staff
discretion on whether sound attenuation walls would be necessary.
Commissioner Finstad added that headlights cause just as much of a disturbance and suggested
adding “fencing” to the language in addition to sound attenuation walls and landscaping.
Lastly, Mayor Paine took Serck’s suggestion and proposed moving the ordinance language from
the special use permit section (Sec 122-614) to the Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements
section (Sec 122-725) in our Landscape and Buffering code.
MOTION by Commissioner Fennessey, seconded by Finstad, and carried to unanimously
approve an ordinance creating a special use permit identifying regulations for drive-
through speaker usage.
MOTION by Commissioner Porter, seconded by Elm, and carried to amend the ordinance
language to read “b. The speaker box and drive-through window must be at least 50 feet
from any property line containing a residential structure, and where possible face away
from any residential structures.”
MOTION by Commissioner Moffat, seconded by Finstad, and carried to amend the
ordinance language to read “c. Drive-through may shall not operate…”
MOTION by Commissioner Paine, seconded by Porter, and being no objection, carried to
amend the ordinance language to remove “d. Use of sound attenuation walls and
landscaping shall be encouraged for their buffering requirements.”
Plan Commission
May 18, 2022
MOTION by Commissioner Moffat, seconded by Porter, and carried to amend the
previous amendment for the ordinance language to read “d. Use of sound attenuation walls
and landscaping shall be encouraged required at the discretion of the Planning Director for
their buffering requirements.”
MOTION by Commissioner Finstad, seconded by Graskey, and carried to amend the
ordinance language to read “d. Use of sound attenuation walls, fencing, and landscaping
shall be required at the discretion of the Planning Director for their buffering
requirements.”
MOTION by Commissioner Paine, seconded by Elm, and carried to amend the ordinance
by placing it in a different part of the Zoning Code to read “Sec. 122-614 Enumerated Sec.
122-725 Parking lot landscaping requirements.”
4. Review and approval of Vacant to Value: New Construction application for 4XX
Cumming Avenue. V2VNC 22-09
Rachel Wagner, from Green New Deal Housing spoke about their organization and the
house/site plans for the three parcels of land the for which the organization has applied.
Green New Deal Housing is a community development organization with a focus on
supplying housing on in-fill lots. The structures are considered a “zero net energy” house
that uses super-efficient energy sources, such as solar, to bring down operating costs that are
less to no additional cost each month compared to traditionally built homes. The
organization also focuses on recruiting new employees into the trades and provides a training
opportunity for apprentices to be involved in forward thinking building techniques. Two
different styles of homes were presented for the three parcels of land. Two 2-story, 3
bedroom, 2 bathroom homes, and one single-story, 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home. Both have
detached two-stall garages. All the site plans were thoughtfully designed to consider solar
access (both to panels and through windows), yard space, fit into neighborhood landscape,
maintain existing mature trees, and safety of vehicle access to area streets.
Commissioner Elm expressed concerns with the use of the term “affordability” when the
costs to build these homes are around $450,000. Wagner explained that in this case the
homes are affordable in long term usage by having fixed low to no utility expenses, fixed
mortgages, durability of the homes. The overall costs of construction are anticipated to come
down through building material donations and workforce training opportunities by partnering
with local unions to use apprenticeship labor rather than journeyman. In addition to all of
this, the Green New Deal Housing organization works directly with the buyer to secure other
subsidies or assistance such as down payment assistance for qualified buyers to get them a
much higher down payment to bring down the overall mortgage cost, and even forgivable
down payment assistance that is a pro-rated amount granted to them as long as they remain in
the home for a determined amount of time. Lastly, Wagner mentioned that the program is in
its infancy, and with time and more projects completed the opportunity to lower building
costs will likely present itself.
Serck expanded that after the initial approval from Plan Commission, staff then receive all
Plan Commission
May 18, 2022
final financing information from the applicant prior to submitting any development
agreements to the Council for approval.
Commissioner Paine reiterated that the agenda item posed to the commissioners was to
review the site plan and project and if it filled the program requirements of building new
construction on in-fill lots in Superior, and not to focus on whether or not the homes are
affordable.
Commissioner Fennessey brought up the “affordability” phrasing when referencing these
homes with a proposed budget of around $450,000 and reiterated similar concerns with the
costs. Fennessey stated concerns with the City getting more involved after initial approval
and needing to provide funding in order for the homes to be constructed. All preliminary
calculations would place the mortgages at rates much higher than what the median household
income could support. Fennessey asked for clarification on Green New Deal Housing’s
program that stated that homes would be sold to those whose household members meet one
of the criteria for being a “protected class.”
Wagner confirmed that would be a priority when selling the homes to prospective buyers and
gave a few examples of a “protected class” and referenced the City’s Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AIFHC) that outlines the City’s need to address these
housing concerns. Serck also confirmed the information from our AIFHC and this type of
project or sale would meet some of the recommendations made in the report.
Commissioner Porter added that this type of housing with green infrastructure is likely going
to be the wave of the future. Commissioner Strum added to the topic of affordability that
regardless of what anyone feels is affordable or not, the responsibility falls to the developer
to pay for and maintain these properties until they sell to owner occupied residents; the City
is not held accountable for those expenses. Commissioners Finstad and Moffat expressed
approval of the program and applications but would like to see this level of subsidy provided
on a much larger scale to help many households rather than by creating one great house.
MOTION by Commissioner Porter, seconded by Elm, and carried to unanimously approve
agenda items 4, 5, and 6 regarding the Vacant to Value: New Construction applications.
5. Review and approval of Vacant to Value: New Construction application for 16XX Iowa
Avenue. V2VNC 22-10
6. Review and approval of Vacant to Value: New Construction application for 2640 John
Avenue. V2VNC 22-11
OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
Plan Commission
May 18, 2022
The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted by:
Allison Johnson
Planning Technician
City of Superior
Plan Commission
May 18, 2022
Get email alerts for Superior
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.