Board of Commissioners
Regular MeetingSwansboro, NC · April 26, 2021
Minutes
Town of Swansboro
Board of Commissioners
April 26, 2021 Regular Meeting
In attendance: Mayor John Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Frank Tursi, Commissioner Pat
Turner, Commissioner Harry PJ Pugliese, Commissioner Larry Philpott, and
Commissioner Laurent Meilleur. It was noted that the Board had returned to remote
meetings through the ZOOM platform as allowed by NCGS 166A-19. Governor Cooper
had declared a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in March 2020 and it
remained in effect.
**********************************
Call to Order/Opening Prayer
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 pm. Mayor Davis gave the invocation. Mayor
Davis noted that he would like to bring attention to the fact that better resources needed
to be used by staff when preparing proposing ordinance amendments and advertising
such. An ordinance amendment would be discussed later in the meeting that he
believed local developer, John Freshwater could have assisted in its preparation. The
Town had many local resources that could help improve the culture in which we work.
Public Comment
Citizens were offered an opportunity to address the Board regarding items listed on the
agenda. No comments were given.
Adoption of Agenda
Mayor Davis asked for Agenda changes as follows:
Add discussion/re-consideration on July 4th fireworks with upcoming changes in
COVID 19 restrictions.
Add a Closed Session under NCGS 143-318.11 (a) (3) for contract review/advise
Manager and Legal.
That the salary/benefits for the proposed Planner Tech be removed from Budget
Amendment 2021-7 for discussion.
Remove all proclamations except National Boating Week.
Move One Harbor Church Lease Extension to Consent along with the Ordinance 2021-
O2 Amendment for Mobile Ice Cream Vendors. Mayor Pro Tem Tursi noted that
Ordinances should not be approved under consent – they needed their own official
vote. Commissioner Meilleur also believed the lease amendment for One Harbor
Church also needed discussion.
On a motion by Commissioner Philpott, seconded by Commissioner Turner, the
Agenda was amended as mentioned above, except those items noted by Mayor Pro Tem
Page 1 of 13
Tursi and Commissioner Meilleur), and Consent Items below were unanimously
approved.
Meeting Minutes – 2/15/21 Special Meeting
3/22/21 Regular Meeting
Tax Refunds – Refunds totaling $425.91.
Ad Valorem Tax
Hunnings John & Chasity $131.73 Listed & paid in Carteret
County. Moved boat there
1/1/2020
Vehicle Tax
Hidalgo, Edson $4.17 Tag Surrender
Phelps, Linda Mitchell & Rodney
William $11.74 Tag Surrender
Phelps, Rodney William $8.35 Tag Surrender
Crosby-Woods, Demetrias Monche $30.53 Tag Surrender
Farren, Erica Dorothy $69.35 Military
Guzman, Florentino Amadeo & Castro, $170.04 Military
Isabel Michelle
ONWASA Administrative Services Agreement - The Administrative Services Agreement
with ONWASA for operation of the satellite office was renewed for FY 21/22 for the
same terms ($35,000) as had been in previous years.
Proclamations
Mayor Davis read and acknowledged National Safe Boating Week - May 22-28. Carl
Rauschenberg thanked the Town for acknowledgement and reiterated the safe boating
tips listed in the proclamation.
Public Hearings
Special Use Permit - The Blazin' Bird Restaurant - Chase Hanford had made application for
a special use to utilize the property at 632 W. Corbett Ave, the former Seaside Coney
Island, as a restaurant. Though the property was previously used as a restaurant,
“Restaurants (including take-out only establishments)” now required a special use in
the B-2 General Business zoning district. Because the property had been vacant due to
damage from Hurricane Florence in September 2018, the use had been discontinued for
more than 180 days, and a special use was required. At their April 6, 2021, regular
meeting, the Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special
use application. There were no additional conditions suggested.
Page 2 of 13
Mayor Davis asked if the staff had any concerns with the proposed special use. Planner
Ansell indicated that the request was not a change of use, and ordinance requirements
were met. There was a slight change to the parking plan based on comments from
NCDOT, they did not want to see any additional parking in the front of the building so
additional parking would be in the rear of the building off Hokum Lane. Planner
Ansell confirmed that because Mr. Hanford was not making improvements more than
50% of the value no additional code requirements had to be implemented. Mr. Hanford
also provided a private appraisal because Onslow County had the building valued at
$0.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Tursi’ inquiry on whether the Planning Board discussed
any concerns with the proximity to the residential area, Planner Ansell stated there was
none, and that the business would be closing at 9:00pm most nights except game nights.
Parking would be at the rear of the building off Hokum Lane and the speed limit 20
mph. Outdoor seating would be located to the right side looking at the building from
NC24 with privacy fencing according to the site plan.
Commissioner Philpott inquired whether any improvements would be made to the sign
and roof as they were tin and had some rust. Mr. Hanford indicated that he planned to
paint the existing areas that had rust. Further improvement may be made in the future
depending on the budget.
All persons providing testimony were sworn in and the public hearing was opened at
6:07 pm. No comments were provided, and the hearing was closed.
Staff notes in the agenda included:
- Regarding sidewalk construction and redevelopment of property; this was not a
change in use, there was no significant or major renovation planned, so sidewalks were
not required.
- Mr. Hanford was not the property owner, but the property owner had signed the
affidavit on the Special Use permit application allowing Mr. Hanford to submit the
application on his behalf.
- Regarding minimum parking requirements; per the site plan, 8 new parking spaces
would be added, bringing the total to 20. Seventeen spaces were required including the
outdoor patio seating. NCDOT would not allow the addition of any spaces in the front
of the building along NC Hwy 24.
Page 3 of 13
- The speed limit on Lisk Drive was 20 mph. Hokum Lane dead-ended into the Bank of
America parking lot which connected to Park Lane, which was also 20 mph.
- Regarding traffic impact - Justin Lins, Engineering Specialist II with NCDOT,
estimated the number of trips per day would not exceed 190. Per the 2019 NCDOT
Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) map, this section of NC Hwy 24 saw an average
of 27,500 trips per day.
- No additional lighting was proposed.
- Regarding regulations for landscaping; no additional requirements existed.
Repairs/improvements would not change the use or alter the existing
building.
- Regarding the trash containment area; the site plan provided the required dumpster.
- Regarding Building Design and Compatibility; the building was presently
listed with a value of $0.00 per Onslow County. The improvements proposed to the
structure would not exceed 50% of the building value based the private appraisal
received from Suzanne H. Nelson, MAI, with Realty Services of Eastern Carolina, Inc.,
and the cost breakdown received from the applicant.
In granting the special use permit, the Board reviewed § 152.210 PROCEDURE FOR
SPECIAL USE PERMITS below and gave due regard to the nature and state of all
adjacent structures and uses, and the districts within which the proposed use was to be
located. The Board considered whether it was necessary or appropriate to affix
conditions for the purposes of protecting neighboring properties and/or the public
interest assuring that the use was harmonious with the area, ensuring that the use was
consistent with the spirit of the ordinance. No conditions were provided.
§ 152.210 PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS.
A) Special use permits may be issued by the Administrator, after approval by the Board
of Commissioners, for the uses as designated in the table of regulations for special uses.
Applications shall include all the requirements pertaining to it as specified in this
section. A hearing shall be held, and all interested persons shall be permitted to offer
relevant comments. The Town Board of Commissioners shall consider the application
and may approve or deny the requested special use permit.
Page 4 of 13
B) In granting a special use permit, the Board of Commissioners shall give due regard to
the nature and state of all adjacent structures and uses, and the districts within which
the proposed use is to be located, and shall make written findings of fact concerning the
existence or absence of the following criteria:
1) The special use is allowed pursuant to § 152.210 and meets all the required conditions and
specifications, including without limitation, those set out in § 152.211. The use, “Restaurants
(including take-out only establishments)” was allowed as a special use in the B-2 zoning
district. There were no specific criteria for the use under Section 152.211.
2) The special use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located
where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and approved. The proposed
business did not directly abut any residential properties; however, it was just south of
Lisk Drive and Hokum Lane in the Russell Park neighborhood which was
predominantly single-family residential. The business proposal offered to operate from
11:00 am to 9:00 pm on Mondays and Wednesday through Sunday. The applicant did
request to remain open on NFL, college football and college basketball gamedays, and
for playoff games until the game concluded.
3) The special use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting
property, OR the special use is a public necessity. An analysis from Suzanne H. Nelson,
MAI, with Realty Services of Eastern Carolina, Inc., indicated no known substantially
injure the value of adjoining or abutting property would occur from what was
proposed.
4) The location and character of the special use, if developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area in which it is located.
The special use shall demonstrate conformance to the Land Use Plan or other plan
in effect at the time and address impacts of the project as required by G.S. §160A-
382(b). The CAMA Land Use Plan Update (2019) identified this property as
Coastal Traditional Neighborhood (CTN), with the portion of the property fronting on
NC Highway 24 as Gateway Corridor. The CTN land use designation was described as
a walkable, compact, residential district laid out based on traditional neighborhood
development patterns. It generally surrounded the Traditional Town Center and
contained single and two-family residential with small-scale multi-family and
neighborhood commercial. The Gateway Corridor (GC) land use designation was
intended to enhance the function and appearance of the NC 24 corridor, as well as other
main entranceways to the town. Generally, the GC area encompassed properties that
were directly adjacent to, visible from, and interact with NC 24.
Page 5 of 13
5) Upon the issuance of any special use permit, the Board of Commissioners shall consider
whether it is necessary or appropriate to affix conditions thereto for the purposes of protecting
neighboring properties and/or the public interest assuring that the use is harmonious with the
area and ensuring that the use is consistent with the spirit of the ordinance and shall affix to
such permit such reasonable and appropriate conditions as it finds are necessary for any of those
purposes. If any conditions affixed to any special use permit or any part thereof is held invalid by
any competent authority, then said special use permit shall be void. No conditions were
applied.
Based on the above mentioned findings, a motion was made by Commissioner Pugliese,
seconded by Commissioner Turner to approve the Special Use Permit by unanimous
vote.
UDO Text Amendment - Chapters § 152.225 - 152.227/Residential Cluster Development
Regulations – At its March 2, 2021, regular meeting, the Planning Board voted to
recommend the proposed rework of the Residential Cluster Development Regulations
to strengthen the requirements for the protection of vulnerable areas such as designated
wetlands and the floodway. The proposed amendments require identification of any
401 or 404 wetlands on preliminary plats, prohibited any required open space from
being made up of 401 or 404 wetlands, and required such 401 or 404 wetlands be
deeded to the Town.
Mayor Davis believed the amendment to be potentially controversial and
recommended it be held until the Board could meet in person. In conversation with
John Freshwater today, who had developed such a development, he was not aware of
the proposed amendment. He believed community input was needed and incentives
put in place to encourage developers to provide the dedications proposed. Specifically,
the addition of (E) Areas identified on the Preliminary Plat as 401 wetlands, 404 wetlands,
floodway, or if located within 30 feet of the normal water level along a coastal shoreline shall be
reserved and dedicated to the Town. This designation shall be recorded on the face of the
Preliminary and Final Plats and a deed recorded conveying the area to the Town for
preservation. No structure, impervious surface or other development shall occur in this area
other than that which is permitted by the State or other regulatory agency.
Planner Ansell noted that the amendment proposed was an optional process and was
recommended by the Carolina Wetlands Association. The proposal came about
following the Swangate Subdivision approval when issues arose related to the open
space provided was the 404 wetlands area.
Page 6 of 13
Commissioner Meilleur stated that the Planning Board vote was 4/0 for approval.
Planner Ansell shared that on March 15, the area of dedication was discussed and
recommended to be identified (wetlands and costal shoreline areas) during preliminary
plat review process and then dedicated at final plat. There was no public present at the
Planning board meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Tursi clarified that section (E) did nothing but require wetlands be
recorded on the plat. He further stated that Mayor Davis had terribly misjudged and
opened discussion with negative perception, which was uncalled for and not his place
to do. Commissioner Meilleur agreed adding that Mayor Davis was promoting his
own position. Robert’s Rule of Order provide that the Mayor’s role was hold a middle
ground and to run the meeting, not to interject his opinion. Planner Ansell offered that
the 30-foot buffer could not be built upon without a variance from CAMA.
Commissioner Philpott noted that the key point was that the amendment provided an
option to the developer. Such amendments were also suggested by the Land Use Plan
and the Board of Commissioners had charged the Planning Board to consider those
recommendations. Mayor Pro Tem Tursi added that the LUP Steering Committee had
made suggestions that preservation of retaining open space was important, and it had
been listed as a major policy goal of the Land Use Plan. Commissioner Turner agreed
with Mayor Pro Tem Tursi.
Mayor Davis reiterated that he felt the proposed language would not incentivize a
developer to develop in the cluster form, nor were local professionals engaged in the
conversation/development of the amendments.
The public hearing was opened at 6:35pm. There were no comments at this time, the
hearing would need to remain open for 24-hours and the vote would take place at the
next meeting.
Business Non-Consent
One Harbor Church Lease Extension – The current lease with One Harbor Church (OHC)
was last amended March 9, 2020. That amendment included a subsidized monthly rate
of $1,029.76 through December 31, 2020. The amendment also included the same rate on
a month-to-month basis starting January 1, 2021.
Construction of OHC's new facility had been delayed due to COVID-19 therefore staff
had discussed the following proposed amendments to the lease agreement.
• Appropriate Consumer Price Index increases for the 2019 and 2020 calendar years be
added to the monthly lease rate
Page 7 of 13
• Subsidies of the rental rate ends October 2021
• Starting November 2021, the monthly rate be $3,142.83
• The lease be on a month-to-month basis starting January 2022
• One Harbor Church representatives expected the need for facilities lease through the
end of Fiscal Year 2021-2022 (June 2022) and maybe further
• A December 2021 CPI increase would increase the lease rate
On a motion by Commissioner Philpott, seconded by Commissioner Turner
Resolution 2021-R3 adopting the amended Lease Amendment with OHC according to
the terms as described, and authorizing the Town Manager to execute, at the
appropriate time, any instruments necessary to consummate the lease agreements was
unanimously approved.
Text Amendment to Town Code Chapter 112: Mobile Ice Cream Vending Regulations – Text
amendments to Chapter 112 were introduced that would better clarify the approval
process for mobile ice cream vendors. The amendments would 1) authorize the Town
Manager to make changes to rates for mobile ice cream vendors, 2) provide terminology
improvements, 3) required a criminal record check on the business owner/applicant and
each proposed driver of any mobile ice cream vending vehicle, and 4) remove the
applicant's cost for the public hearing.
Commissioner Meilleur asked what happened if the criminal records check was
negative and wondered if the language needed to read differently. Chief Jackson
shared that if a criminal record check revealed a criminal history of a driver, then the
owner of the business may not be able to run the business and/or be required to use
different drivers. Mayor Davis inquired whether the Manager had the authority to
decide on allowing the driver based on the type of criminal record. Chief Jackson
confirmed. Attorney Parson was fine with the ordinance as written, indicating that
there needed to be some flexibility based on the offense discovered, however, the same
process should be applicable for such vendors.
Mayor Pro Tem Tursi asked if other such vendors were required to do a criminal
records check. Manager Seaberg clarified that like vendors were regulated by different
agencies – mobile ice cream trucks was regulated by USDA. Food Trucks were
regulated through the Health Department. It should also be noted that the customer
base for ice cream trucks was children and the criminal records check helped protect
against predators. Attorney Parson agreed and offered that the same logic should
apply to all like vendors. When the Town continued its discussion on whether to allow
food trucks, the same language should be applied (if allowed).
Page 8 of 13
Commissioner Turner inquired whether ice cream trucks were allowed to park at the
soccer park or setup on private property. She also offered it might be best to hold on
ordinance adoption until future discussion was held on whether to allow food trucks.
Planner Ansell shared that a designated route was required by ordinance, setting up on
private property was not allowed – doing so would then define them as an itinerant
merchant, which was not allowed.
Mayor Pro Tem Tursi noted that such vendors could operate at the park if for a non-
profit event. He too believed all such vendors should follow the same process. Planner
Ansell confirmed and added that such vendors were not allowed within 100 foot of a
school zone or in the business district.
Mayor Davis indicated that the Town did not do background checks on local businesses
– he asked if the law allowed such and if not, was the Town empowered to require such
from other vendors. Attorney Parson was not confident the law allowed the Town to
regulate brick and mortar business to such degree. He asked Director Stanley of Parks
and Recreation if background checks were conducted on program vendors/festival
vendors. She stated that background checks were done for program vendors but not for
festival/event vendors. He was not aware of any law preventing the Town from
regulating food vendors though.
Commissioner Philpott agreed it might be best to hold on adoption until the Board had
further discussion on food trucks. He did understand the need to protect the
community from predators, but more research was needed.
Commissioner Pugliese agreed to wait but did believe ice cream trucks and food trucks
were different – ice cream routes were geared to draw children, food trucks were
looking for high traffic areas, ball parks.
On a motion by Mayor Pro Tem Tursi, seconded by Commissioner Philpott, Ordinance
2021-O2 was tabled for further research and discussion when the Board returned to in-
person meetings by unanimous vote.
Planning Technician - At the April 12th Board Meeting, the Town Manager shared the
need to hire a Planning Technician prior to the Town Planner’s maternity leave in July
2021. The position would be funded through Admin Services and Permitting. To cover
salaries/benefits for the month of June 2021, $6,248.18 would need to be appropriated.
Mayor Davis indicated that funding the position now created a fulltime position as
presented. Commissioner Turner believed it could be a temporary position with an
Page 9 of 13
expiration date. Manager Seaberg noted that he had not intended for the position to be
temporary – he was under the impression that the Board saw the need for a fulltime
position. Commissioner Philpott understood the need but was not prepared without
knowing more about the FY 21/22 Budget. He would support contracting the position
out during the maternity leave. Commissioner Turner agreed. Commissioner Pugliese
agreed. Manager Seaberg was directed to obtain a contract price.
Budget Ordinance Amendment #2021-7 (as amended above) – Multiple departments
required amending for FY 20/21. The source for the below amendments was to be
appropriated from Fund Balance.
Public Works/Streets - NCDOT required Wayfinding Signs be installed on breakaway
poles. Requested $7,000 be appropriated to purchase 13 breakaway poles.
Parks & Recreation - The NC Coastal Federation was awarded funds for asphalt
removal and permeable parking at Ward Shore Park. The total project cost was
$118,302. A partnership with NC Coastal Federation provided assurance of at least a
$40,000 reimbursement towards the overall project. Project costs overran by $10,000.
Requested $50,000 be appropriated for project costs.
On a motion by Commissioner Philpott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Tursi, Budget
Ordinance Amendment 2021-7 (as amended) was unanimously approved.
Financial Report – March 2021 – Finance Director Johnson reviewed details from the
monthly financial report, attached herein.
Mayor Davis asked if he understood correctly that the Town was over $400,000 in the
green (positive) with current expenditures. Director Johnson confirmed but did note
that approximately $259,000 was projected to be needed by year end – June 30, 2021.
Meetings Moving Forward – Following discussion on near future COVID 19 restrictions
being lifted, Board members agreed to return to in-person meetings in June 2021 if such
restrictions were lifted.
Future Agenda Items – A memo detailing proposed upcoming agenda items was
reviewed and an opportunity for the Board to introduce any new items was given.
Commissioner Philpott encouraged staff to arrange JOED Director, Mark Sutherland to
attend a future meeting to discuss Economic Development Committee and provide an
overview of the Strategic Plan.
Page 10 of 13
Board members were eager to see the draft budget updates. A Special Budget Meeting
(remotely) was set for Thursday, May 13, 2021, at 5:30pm.
Downtown Event Discussion (May – October) – In a press release last week Governor Roy
Cooper had indicated he would be slowly loosening COVID19 restrictions by June 1,
2021. Mayor Davis believed the Town should re-consider allowing some of the events
that had been cancelled through July 4th, specifically, the July 4th fireworks. He shared
that the fireworks vendors had agreed to accept a non-refundable $500 deposit – the
event could be held on July 2nd or 5th with the final total cost being $10,000 on an inquiry
from the Board. The Laser Light Show (cost $14,000) partnerships had not materialized.
Commissioner Philpott asked the total loss if fireworks had to be cancelled. According
to Mayor Davis, only the $500 non-refundable deposit would be lost. Director Stanley
believed the details could be worked out if the Governor loosened the restrictions as
suggested.
Commissioner Meilleur thought it odd to support $10,000 for fireworks but not support
a fulltime Planning Technician. The July 4th Fireworks would also have additional fees
for staffing.
Mayor Pro Tem Tursi asked if there would be an additional $10,000 for fireworks at
Mullet Festival. The Mullet Festival fell within the FY 21/22 Budget. The vendor
agreement though included a quote for $10,000 for each event - July 2 and Mullet
Festival, otherwise it would be $15,000 each event. Mayor Pro Tem did not have strong
feelings either way but did not feel July 5th was a good night.
Commissioner Turner and Pugliese indicated support if restrictions lifted.
Manager Seaberg clarified that a site visit to the island was still needed to assure any
clean up needed was doable prior to the event.
In addition, Mayor Davis noted that the Tams were already scheduled (by contract) to
provide music downtown on July 4th. It was noted that street closures would be needed
both nights. No objections were heard, and confirmation would be discussed with
Chief Jackson. Believing there was a consensus, staff would proceed with fireworks for
July 2nd and the July 4th Tams music as discussed.
Page 11 of 13
Public Comments
Citizens were offered an opportunity to address the Board regarding items not listed on
the agenda.
David Drafton, owners of a mobile ice cream truck entered the meeting late and
inquired if the ordinance amendment was approved. Mayor Davis shared that the
amendment was tabled, that the current ordinance stood until further notice. Mr.
Drafton asked if that meant his application was not considered. Staff was unaware that
Mr. Drafton had applied. Such required a public hearing by ordinance. Mayor Pro
Tem Tursi was perplexed that the Commissioners had to vote to approve a mobile ice
cream truck. It was clarified that removing the action by the Board was part of the
amendment. Manager Seaberg would meet with Mr. Drafton and Chief Jackson to
determine an expedited process and if a hearing could be scheduled.
Manager’s Comments
Manager Seaberg gave highlights from the Manager’s Brief provided in the agenda
packet.
Staff was pursuing a 319 Grant project to map the stormwater system – if awarded there
would be a $34,000 match by the Town, the total project $85,000. Mayor Tem Tursi
offered that the Town typically provided in-kind services to offset the match. Board
members agreed to proceed.
As part of the NC DCM Resilient Coastal Communities Program (RCCP) Grant,
development of a Community Action Team was needed. Manager Seaberg
recommended the following: the Manager, Planner, Flood Appeals Chair, Planning
Chair, Board of Adjustment Chair, and two representatives from the elected Board.
The Wayfinding Signs are under production. Staff is researching decorative style poles
that would be crashworthy signs, a requirement of NCDOT.
Regarding the NC State Historic Preservation Office Florence and Michael (ESHPF)
Hurricane Disaster Relief Grant for the Emmerton School, the contract was still
pending.
The Dockwalk Phase 2 CAMA Grant contract has been received and signed. An
easement was required from adjacent property owner Randy Swanson.
The Ward Shore Living Shoreline Project was complete.
Page 12 of 13
NCDOT reported at $97,000 cost overage in installing the sidewalk along NC24. The
Town had provided $116,000 towards that project.
The Downtown Traffic Movement Plan had been provided to the Board. Manager
Seaberg shared concerns on the number of signs recommended for the historic district.
Although Mayor Davis favored the number of signs to better educate the public on the
new traffic movement, Commissioner Philpott noted that the wayfinding signs would
also be added and would help with education and direct to the public. Commissioner
Meilleur suggested leaving the sign recommendations to the traffic engineer expert.
Board members also favored decorative crosswalks for historic district instead of white
paint across the road. It did not seem likely that the traffic movement changes would
be implemented by the end of May.
Regarding the Emergency Operations Center, the structural engineer was finalizing the
report and Manager Seaberg hoped to provide the report in May.
Board Comments
Commissioner Philpott complemented the Manager and Staff on their efforts to make
progress on the number of projects the town had going on during hurricanes and the
pandemic.
Mayor Pro Tem Tursi complemented the Public Works team for their work at Ward
Shore. It had been a long, drawn-out project.
Mayor Davis shared that Ms. Voit, a wheelchair bound individual had complimented
the Town on the recent sidewalk installation along NC24.
A brief recess was taken from 8:40pm – 8:42pm.
Closed Session
On a motion by Commissioner Philpott, seconded by Commissioner Turner, the Board
entered closed session pursuant to NCGS 143-318.11 (a) (3) to consult with the attorney
by unanimous vote.
During closed session, a motion was made and seconded to return to open session. No
action was taken.
Adjournment
On a motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Meilleur, the
meeting adjourned at 9:00pm.
Page 13 of 13
Regular Meeting
April 26, 2021
1
1. Please turn cell phones to “off” or “vibrate”.
2. The Board offers the public three opportunities to speak during the
meeting:
A comment period is offered at the beginning and end of the meeting.
Please note that a separate opportunity is provided for those items
requiring a public hearing.
Public Hearing(s) – There are two (2) public hearings scheduled for this
meeting.
3. Under the ZOOM Meeting Platform, individuals wishing to make comments
should “raise their hand” from their computer. At the appropriate time,
Major Davis will acknowledge those with comments.
2
1
PUBLIC COMMENT
Citizen opportunity to address the Board for items
listed on the agenda.
3
AGENDA AND CONSENT ITEMS
Action Needed: Motion to Adopt the Agenda as
prepared (or amended) and approval of the Consent
Items
4
2
PROCLAMATIONS
National Safe Boating Week - May 22-28
5
PUBLIC HEARING
Special Use Permit – The Blazin’ Bird Restaurant
Chase Hanford has submitted an application for special use to utilize the
property at 632 W. Corbett Ave, the former Seaside Coney Island, as a
restaurant. Though the property was previously used as a restaurant,
“Restaurants (including take-out only establishments)” now require a special
use in the B-2 General Business zoning district. Because the property has
been vacant due to damage from Hurricane Florence in September 2018, the
use has been discontinued for more than 180 days, and a special use is
required.
Action Needed: Per Section 152.210 of the UDO, the Board shall consider the
application and may approve or deny the requested special use permit.
Presenter: Jennifer Ansell – Planner
6
3
PUBLIC HEARING
b. UDO Text Amendment - Chapters § 152.225 - 152.227/Residential Cluster
Development Regulations
At their March 2, 2020 regular meeting, the Planning Board discussed their immediate
goals with regard to implementation of the Land Use Plan. The first priority established
was to re-work the Residential Cluster Development Regulations to strengthen the
requirements for the protection of vulnerable areas such as designated wetlands and the
floodway.
The proposed amendments require identification of any 401 or 404 wetlands on
preliminary plats, prohibits any required open space from being made up of 401 or 404
wetlands, and requires such 401 or 404 wetlands be deeded to the Town.
Action Needed: Motion to adopt Ordinance 2021-O1 amending UDO Chapters 152.225 -
152.227/Residential Cluster Development Regulations and to adopt a consistency
statement.
Presenter: Jennifer Ansell – Planner
7
BUSINESS NON-CONSENT
One Harbor Church Lease Extension
At the March 9, 2020 meeting, an amendment to our lease agreement with One
Harbor Church was approved. The amendment included a subsidized monthly rate
of $1,029.76 through December 31, 2020. The amendment also included the same
rate on a month-to-month basis starting January 1, 2021. Construction of OHC's
new facility has been delayed due to COVID-19 therefore we have discussed
proposed amendments to the lease agreement with representative of One Harbor
Church.
Action Needed: Motion to approve Resolution 2021-R3 Amended Lease Amendment
with the terms as described, and authorize the Town Manager to execute, at the
appropriate time, any instruments necessary to consummate the lease agreements.
Presenter: Chris Seaberg – Town Manager
8
4
BUSINESS NON-CONSENT
Text Amendment to Town Code Chapter 112: Mobile Ice Cream Vending
Regulations
To better clarify the approval process for mobile ice cream vendors, amendments
are recommended to
1) Authorized the Town Manager to make changes to rates for mobile ice cream
vendors;
2) Terminology improvements;
3) Require a criminal records check on the business owner/applicant and each
proposed driver of any mobile ice cream vending vehicle; and
4) Removal of the applicant's cost for the public hearing.
Action Needed: Motion to adopt Ordinance 2021-O2 amending Chapter 112 of the
Town Code of Ordinances to clarify the process for approving mobile ice cream
vendors.
Presenter: Ken Jackson – Police Chief
9
BUSINESS NON-CONSENT
Budget Ordinance Amendment 2021-7 Multi-Departments
Amendments are needed for the following departments, with funds being
appropriated from Fund Balance for all.
Action Needed: Motion to approve Budget Ordinance Amendment #2021-7
Presenter: Sonia Johnson – Finance Director
10
5
BUSINESS NON-CONSENT
Financial Report
Presenter: Sonia Johnson – Finance Director
11
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
FINANCIAL REPORT
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2021)
REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
LOAN PAYMENTS
INVESTMENTS
12
6
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
REVENUES/EXPENDITURES
TWO YEAR COMPARISON
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2021)
GENERAL FUND
ENCUMBRANCES INCLUDED
Total Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures $458,297
13
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
REVENUES/EXPENDITURES
TWO YEAR COMPARISON
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2021)
(ACTUAL)
GENERAL FUND
(ENCUMBRANCES NOT INCLUDED)
Total Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures $574,532
14
7
(PURCHASE ORDERS)
(PAID YEAR TO DATE) ENCUMBERED SPENT %
DEPT. BUDGET ACTUAL BALANCE MARCH 31, 2021
GOVERNING BODY 14,098 10,551 356 77.4%
ADMIN SERVICES 429,255 308,324 4,085 72.8%
FINANCE 300,825 182,106 - 60.5%
LEGAL 42,000 22,938 - 54.6%
PUBLIC BUILDINGS 353,752 265,923 9,890 78.0%
FIRE 909,443 549,896 43,015 65.2%
PERMITTING 223,915 151,332 67.6%
POLICE 1,050,863 679,635 12,377 65.9%
PUBLIC WORKS-STREETS 296,916 251,408 4,572 86.2%
POWELL BILL-STREETS 90,318 18,042 5,635 26.2%
PARKS & RECREATION 291,304 157,792 12,135 58.3%
CHURCH STREET DOCK 8,230 4,610 - 56.0%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 169,212 140,595 24,827 97.8%
FESTIVALS & EVENTS 95,451 3,770 (675) 3.2%
NON DEPARTMENTAL 510,206 483,948 17 94.9%
TOTAL 4,785,788 3,230,870 116,235 69.9%
**
15
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
REVENUES/EXPENDITURES
TWO YEAR COMPARISON
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2021)
STORMWATER ENTERPRISE FUND
ENCUMBRANCES INCLUDED
Total Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures $15,751
16
8
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
REVENUES/EXPENDITURES
TWO YEAR COMPARISON
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2021)
SOLID WASTE ENTERPRISE FUND
ENCUMBRANCES INCLUDED
Total Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures $35,466
17
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
LOAN REPORT
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2021)
Item Principal Interest End Date Annual Debt
DEBT
Balance Rate Service
Town Hall/Tanker $534,076 2.69 03/21/2028 $84,724
SERVICE
Public Safety Facility
Fire Truck
$160,000
$265,418
2.58
2.08
12/22/2024
11/01/2026
$45,160
$47,512
Equipment/Vehicles $50,832 1.87 11/01/2021 $51,783
Sleeping Quarters $150,000 2.43 12/14/2026 $29,253
Grapple Truck/Town $227,700 1.72 6/25/2025 $47,917
Hall Generator
Total Debt $1,388,026 $306,349
18
9
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
CASH & INVESTMENTS REPORT
(AS OF MARCH 31, 2021)
CASH & INVESTMENTS
BALANCE INTEREST RATE
BANK
First Citizens Bank $750,230 .01%
NC CMT-General $3,572,016 .01%
19
Any Questions
?
20
10
BUSINESS NON-CONSENT
Meeting Format Moving Forward
Last month, the Board discussed its meeting format moving forward and the
consensus was to remain remote and discuss options again on April 26, 2021.
The current Executive Order expires Friday, April 23, 2021 and it is expected
that Governor Cooper will hold a press conference later in the week to
address "moving forward."
Action Needed: Discuss and determine meeting format moving forward
Presenter: John Davis – Mayor
21
NEW BUSINESS/NON-CONSENT
Future Agenda Items
The purpose of this memo is to provide the Board with matters that staff
anticipates/proposes for upcoming meetings. It should be noted that these
items are tentatively scheduled for the specified monthly agenda but are
subject to change due to preparation of materials, public notice requirements,
etc. In providing this memo each month, we hope it will also provide
opportunity for the Board to introduce items of interest and subsequent
direction for placement on future agendas, which will allow staff the
opportunity to plan accordingly.
Action Needed: Discussion and guidance to staff on future agenda items.
Presenter: Paula Webb – Assistant Manager/Clerk
22
11
PUBLIC COMMENT
Citizen opportunity to address the Board.
23
MANAGER’S COMMENTS
Chris Seaberg, Town Manager
24
12
BOARD COMMENTS
Mayor John Davis
Mayor Pro Tem Frank Tursi
Commissioner Pat Turner
Commissioner Harry “PJ” Pugliese
Commissioner Larry Philpott
Commissioner Laurent Meilleur
25
CLOSED SESSION
26
13
ADJOURN
27
14
Get email alerts for Swansboro
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.