Historic Preservation Commission
Regular MeetingSwansboro, NC · December 20, 2022
Minutes
TOWN OF SWANSBORO
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
DECEMBER 20, 2022, REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Call to Order
The meeting of Swansboro Historic Preservation Commission was called to order at 5:31PM.
Those in attendance were Patrick Larkin, Christina Ramsey, Kim Kingrey and Jonathan
McDaniel and ALT members Gregg Casper and Elaine Justice. Absent Ed Binanay.
Approval of Minutes
On a motion by Christine Ramsey, seconded by Kim Kingrey, the November 15, 2022, regular
meeting minutes were unanimously approved.
Old Business
A. Text Amendment related to Massing standards in the Historic District
Following review of Massing Standards, draft ordinances, specific statutes, and recent legal case
laws related to such, staff prepared a text amendment to the UDO Appendix III Historic District
Design Standards, Section 11 New Construction.
Items highlighted in yellow below were the amendment recommendations to submit to the
Planning Board for recommendation. Those items in blue, the HPC added.
A. Intent
It is the intent of these regulations to assure that new construction including additions is congruous
with the special character of the district. In considering new construction, the Commission and/or
the Planner shall direct design that is harmonious with the character of the district.
Consultation with the Swansboro Historic Preservation Commission in the early stages of a new
construction project to become familiar with its procedures and aspects of design recommended.
Having a N.C. licensed architect or engineer prepare a massing study is required. The massing
study shall include an existing conditions plan (showing topography, any significant less, utilities,
etc.) and a proposed condition site plan. Plans shall be prepared with a scale of 1 inch = 20 feet or
of a size easily reviewed by staff or the Swansboro Historic Commission. Massing studies enable
graphic analysis of the shape, form, size and building envelope of proposed new construction. The
massing study provides the applicant a way to document the proposed building height and scale
and other elements of the proposed construction as they relate to nearby existing buildings,
especially in the block.
BUILDING HEIGHT/SCALE
8) Make the scale (the relationship of a building’s mass and details to a human being) of the
proposed building compatible with the scale of other contributing structures in the historic
district. This relationship to building mass should include nearby buildings in the block and
adjoining open space.
MATERIALS
11) Keep the siding and trim material of the proposed building consistent with materials
traditionally used on the immediate block and in the historic district. The physical elements of
the building, such as stone or wood walls, brick, fencing, landscaping mass, building facades and
other elements, or combinations thereof shall be included.
TEXTURE
17) Create in new construction a similar degree of texture that is found in contributing buildings
in the historic district. However, concentrate on the ability to blend rather than duplication.
Texture is the relief on a building surface that is achieved through the use and interaction of a
variety of building materials and shapes. Materials such as weatherboard siding, decorative
fishcake fish scale shingles, and beaded board porch ceilings are examples of wooden
architectural elements that have different physical and visual qualities and contribute to the
“texture” of a building surface.
FORM AND RHYTHM
23) Create form and rhythm in new construction through the use of architectural elements and
details. Study neighboring historic structures on the block to see if a consistent treatment of
elements exists and emulate this feature pattern in the new construction. However, limit the
amount in which one new building emulates a contributing building unless the building is a
reproduction of an existing contributing building from the Town’s Historic District. In which
case, a key stone should be imbedded in the foundation to identify when the new building was
built.
Board discussion and comments concerning massing:
- In response to inquiries from the board Mrs. Correll clarified the following:
If a house was rebuilt it would have to go back in the same footprint as original structure, but
all construction must be consistent with the Unified Development Ordinance and NC General
Statutes.
- How does massing affect the flood zone? As an example, Mrs. Correll explained that the area
of Water Street along the intercoastal was in a VE floodplain. Any building was likely to be
elevated 10 feet so when you are working with new construction the building may be limited
to one story or story and a half to meet the height restrictions.
On a motion by Christina Ramsey seconded by Jonathan McDaniel the amendments were
recommended for approval as shown above. All members were in favor.
A. Reconsider Action on Fence Review
In May of 2022, the Historic Commission took action to remove fences as staff review and for
them to be reviewed under minor work. Planner, Andrea Correll proposes that HPC reconsider
its action and leave fences under staff review. With the notable experience she has with historic
preservation, she was confident that she could monitor and approve fences in the historic district.
On a motion by Kim Kingrey, seconded by Jonathan McDaniel fence review/approval to remain
with staff. All members were in favor.
Chairman/Board/Staff Comments
Staff comments
- The board was informed that owners at 220 Elm Street had replaced a worn-out roof with
“in kind” material.
- The Fiscal 2021-2022 Certified Local Government Annual report for Swansboro was
submitted.
Board comments
The board requested an update on sending out flyers informing local historic district property
owners of the required standards. Mrs. Correll shared that she planned to do this early 2023.
- The historic district residence survey in “Survey Monkey” on the Town website.
- Deliver by email or deliver a packet to historic district residence containing the matrix of
approval process and forms to submit.
Board members offered to assist with delivering information door to door. They would also like
to see some type of receipt that the owners received the information distributed, either by email,
hand deliveries and return receipt from mailings.
Public Comments
A board member read a letter that was written by Amelia Dees-Killette the chairperson with the
Swansboro Historical Association concerning massing.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 6:07pm.
Agenda
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda
Town of Swansboro
Tuesday, December 20, 2022
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes
a. November 15, 2022 Regular Minutes
III. Old Business
a. Text Amendment related to Massing standards in the Historic District
Presenter: Andrea Correll, AICP Planner
Following review of Massing Standards, draft ordinances, specific statues, and recent legal case
laws related to such, staff has prepared a Text Amendments to Appendix III Historic District
Design Standards, Section 11 New Construction.
Recommended Action: Recommend approval of the requested text amendments to the Planning
Board.
b. Reconsider Action on Fence Review
Presenter: Paula Webb, Town Manager
In May of 2022, the Historic Preservation Commission took action to remove fences as staff
review and for them to be reviewed under minor work. It was discovered that no text
amendment was forwarded for adoption following that action.
This information was shared with incoming Planner Andrea Correll, who proposes that the HPC
reconsider its action with the notable experience she has with historic preservation.
If the HPC is inclined to reconsider, a formal motion to rescind its previous action would be in
order.
Recommended Action: Motion to allow fence review/approvals to remain as staff approval.
IV. Public Comments
V. Chairman/Board Thoughts/Staff Comments
VI. Adjournment
Get email alerts for Swansboro
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.