Planning Board

************************************************************ TAUNTON PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Meeting held at 15 Summer Street ************************************************************* DATE: December 3, 2020 BOARD MEMBERS: Bob Campbell, Chairman Anthony Abreau Arthur Lopes, Vice Chairman John Reardon Manuel Spencer, Clerk Dennis I. Ackerman Brian Carr ADVISORS: Michael Patneaude, City Engineer Kevin Scanlon, City Planner __________________________________________________________________________ Roll Call: Reardon, Lopes, Spencer, Carr, Ackerman and Campbell present. Meeting opens at 5:34 PM. By virtual means (Zoom) Chairman Campbell read statement: “Tonight’s Planning Board meeting is being conducted remotely consistent with Gov. Bakers Exec. Orders due to the current State of Emergency in the CW. In order to mitigate the transmission of the COVID-19 virus, we have been advised and directed by the CW to suspend public gatherings, and as such, the meetings in a publicly accessible physical location. Accommodations for public access have been made via livestreaming, and this meeting is also being recorded. This evening there is also public hearings. Anyone wishing to make a public comments can call 774-406- 5261 when we get to that portion of the hearing.” Arthur made motion to accept November 5, 2020 minutes, seconded by Manny. All in favor. Cont’d Public Hearing – Definitive Subdivision – Perry Estates – to be located at 35 Highland St. – creating 14 residential lots – submitted by NorthCounty Group on behalf of Sheila Abreau, owned by Wayne & Karen Perry. Hearing opens at 5:31 PM. Roll call: Lopes, Reardon, Carr, Spencer, Ackerman, and Campbell Chairman Campbell reads the public hearing notice and dept. comments from City Engineer, City Planner, Water Dept., B.O.H and Conservation Commission which were placed on file. John DeSousa, NorthCounty Group, Atty. William Rounds representing petitioner. They are proposing a 14 lot subdivision on the east side of Highland Street with a 700 foot roadway with a 200’ cul-de-sac. They have received Conservation Commission approval and they have asked us to move lot 7 out of the drainage easement and they moved it north out of the flood plain line. They moved the basin on the back side outside the flood plain. They addressed the City Engineer’s comments and moved the sidewalk to the south end and show Bradley head on the plans. John stated they are requesting waivers form 26 foot pavement width, 1 sidewalk on one side, allow eastern red cedar trees, and reduce the street line radius (20 feet). It was suggested putting fence around the detention basin. Chairman Campbell asked if the fence would be outside the maintenance road and it was answered yes. Manny asked what is the width of the lot? It was answered 130 feet and the 1 average lot size is around 16,000 sq. ft. with a 100 foot minimum lot width. John stated he showed a typical house location just to show they meet setbacks. Dennis pointed out under the zoning the lots could have a single or a duplex by right. It was asked what they were proposing and Atty. Rounds answers it depends on the market? Brian stated he would like to know what would be built because it would be a cleaner decision. He asked about why they wanted different trees and John D. answers the red eastern cedars won’t grow as tall as maples or oaks and they stay green all year along. They grow about 35 – 40 feet . Brian asked about snow removal and John D answers there will be snow easements on cul-de-sac for all lots. There was some discussion as to what is being proposed single family or duplexes? Brian stated he would like to know. John D. stated per his client they will be all single family homes. John R. stated there is no snow easement for the first cul-de-sac just the second cul-de-sac. It was asked how many lots in the flood zone and it was answered lot 7. Public Input: No one in favor or opposed. WAIVERS: 1. To allow the pavement width to be reduced from 30 feet to 26 feet. 2. To allow one 6 foot wide sidewalk instead of sidewalks on both sides. 3. Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) 4. To allow Eastern Red Cedar to be used as street trees to avoid the taller trees listed in the subdivision rules and regulations. 5. To allow a 20 foot street line radius on the northeast corner of the street. 6. To allow 0 foot radius on the Southeast corner of the street. CONDITIONS: 1. The Subdivision will follow the outside consultant guidelines for inspections which shall also include coverage of the sewer and water extensions and all other work offsite completed in conjunction with this project. The initial escrow deposit for paying for inspections shall be $7,000 and shall be replenished back to a $4,000 balance anytime the balance dips below $1,500. 2. The indicated access and utility easements must be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. A new street name is required. 4. Move the wheel chair ramps to the apex of the intersecting street. This may require the catch basins to be relocated. 5. There is a Bradley Head catch basin on Highland Street that may interfere with the location/construction of the proposed roadway. It needs to be shown on the plan and if it’s in the proposed roadway, a plan to accommodate the structure needs to be included. (The drainage structure was identified on the plans but it was not addressed) 6. Show the benchmark datum on the plan. 7. DPW permit apply: CLC, Road Opening and/or Trench 8. DPW Water Specifications apply; design, review, materials, installation, and inspection/approval 9. A Notice of Intent has been filed with the Conservation Commission for the construction of the roadway. Provide the floodplain elevation of 21.2 on the plan and that the detention basin be moved at least 40 feet to the north and west. 2  10. The property will be serviced by municipal water & sewer. All dwellings must comply with the Minimum Standards of Fitness for Human Habitation, State Sanitary Code, Chapter II. 11. Provide fencing around the detention basin. Hearing closed at 6:06 PM Public Hearing – Special Permit – 3 Winthrop Lane - For a single family dwelling in a Highway Business District on property at 3 Winthrop Lane, also known as Assessor’s property I.D. 88 - 66 Hearing opens at 6:06 PM. Roll Call: Carr, Reardon, Lopes, Ackerman, Spencer and Campbell. Chairman Campbell read dept. comments from the City Planner, Engineer, Water Dept., Veolia Water, Conservation Commission and B.O.H.. Karen Patneaude, P.E. Earth Services Corp. representing petitioner. This lot recently received ZBA approval and filed a Form A plan. Now they are asking for a Special Permit for a residential use in a Highway Business District. Winthrop Lanes has 3 homes and most recently a developer received approval to widen Winthrop Lane via a Definitive Subdivision which will provide frontage for 2 more lots. There is one house in the HHB and there will be total of 6 homes if this is approved. Brian asked about the comments from Veolia Water and the curb stop? Karen stated that there is a new stub for this house when they widened the road and Veolia Water may not be aware of that. Brian stated due to the size of the lot he will be voting no. Manny asked about the frontage and lot size and Karen answers they have sufficient frontage just needed variance for lot size. It was noted the existing house does have municipal sewer when they put in sewer about 9 years ago. Public Input: No one in favor or opposed. Dennis made motion to approve the Special Permit, seconded by Arthur. 4 members in favor 2 member opposed. Hearing closed at 6:24 PM Chairman Campbell announced the vote to approve did not pass (need 5 members in favor) Special Permit Denied Public Hearing - A Special Permit/Site Plan Review - 24 Winthrop Street - for the construction of a 3 story commercial (4,600 sq. ft. office/retail ) and 16 residential apartments, submitted by MLB Realty Development, owned by NASAP Bastis, LLC John DeSousa, Mike Binda and Atty. William Rounds. Dennis Ackerman excused. Chairman Campbell read dept. comments from the DIRB and Veolia Water was placed on file. Atty. Rounds stated the Board at the previous meeting stated they would prefer a mixed use so the applicant withdrew his special permit for all residential use with the Council and now has Special permit with planning Board for a mixed use. John stated they updated plans and now the plans show 16 units with commercial/retail. The site is currently vacant and was the former Baron Brothers Furniture store. The access ramp is still there. They would need to amend their conservation approval. At the last meeting the Board asked about snow storage? They will place snow in back of dumpster and they added elevation slope and they will keep the building out of the 50 year flood elevation and 100 year flood elevation is 18” above water . They have added an elevator and will connect to sewer. They moved handicapped space closest to the elevator and added ramps on the entrance and signage. John R. asked what type of building will it be and it was answered a combination of stone front and wood. It was asked if there would be a patio on top and it was answered yes. Brian asked if the building is in the 50 year flood zone? John D. stated basically it’s all out of the 50 year flood zone. Brian asked if they would be all market rate? It was answered yes all market rate. It was asked about the security and if anyone would be on site and it was answered someone will be there to handle all tenants concerns. Brian wanted the residence parking defined to ensure they have space. John stated they have some parking overflow. Chairman Campbell asked about the bend in the sewer service as shown on the plans and he asked they put it as straight as possible. Brian asked asked if there would be anything 3 around the property to prevent anyone or anything going into the river? John D. answer there will be concrete curbing and parking area will have wheel stops. Chairman Campbell asked if the top/bottom of the retaining wall and it was answered 60 feet. Manny stated this will be a big improvement to the area and he has concerns but they have been addressed. Public Input; Dennis Ackerman, on behalf of Congregation Agudath Achim , and they support the request and they have been working together to supply parking to the church if needed. Motion made and seconded to grant the Special Permit/Site Plan Review with the following conditions: Condition #1) That the plans dated September 1, 2020 shall govern with the following additional conditions; Condition #2) Lighting shall not illuminate any portion of abutting properties Condition #3) The site shall be kept clean and clear of debris Condition #4) Two sets of as-builts shall be submitted upon occupancy for all work on site and shall include design engineer and land surveyor certification notes stating the development has been built according to the approved plans. Plans will show all construction of buildings, utilities, grades, setbacks etc Condition #5) Two sets of updated plans shall be provided that conforms to this decision prior to Building permit Condition #6) Dumpsters shall be located on a concrete pad, enclosed with a 6 foot stockade fence, be kept closed at all times and emptied regularly Condition #7) A current fire flow test is required and water service work will have to be completed by a City licensed Contractor, with road opening and or trench permits. Condition #8) A filing with the Conservation Commission is required Condition #9) The parking analysis shall be updated to reflect the required 15 commercial parking spaces and the 22 residential parking spaces required for a total of 47 required space with a requested waiver down to 22 spaces Condition #10) Snow storage shall be relocated to the area behind the dumpster and excess snow shall be removed from the site Condition #11) 1 van accessible handicap space shall be provided under the building and the 2nd one outside converted to a regular parking space Condition #12) The oil water separator shall be maintained and cleaned every 3 months at a minimum and reports shall be provided upon request. Condition #13) The sanitary sewer service shall be connected to an existing sanitary sewer manhole located at the back edge of the property Condition #14) All apartments are to be market rate as presented at hearing. Condition #15) Property Management office to be on site. Condition #16) Designated parking spaces for the residential use shall be properly marked. 5 member in favor, 1 member excused, 1 member absent. Public Hearing - A Special Permit/Site Plan Review - Bay Street, Property I.D. 14-7 - for the construction of a three-story 30,000 sq. ft. commercial building consisting of a bank and office space with 3 drive-thru bays, 111 parking spaces and municipal utilities, submitted by Joseph Baptista, JR., Pres. & CEO, Mechanic’s Co-Operative Bank, owned by Koffler/GID Taunton LLC. Roll Call: Carr, Reardon, Ackerman, Lopes, Spencer and Campbell. Hearing opens at 6:54 PM. Chairman Campbell reads dept. comments from the DIRB, Engineer, and Veolia Water which were placed on file. Jamie Bissonnette, Zennith Consulting and Joe Baptista, Mechanic’s Co-Op Bank. They are proposing a 4 new headquarters with 2 drive-up windows. They are proposing to construct on Bay Street, Map 14, Lot 17 which will have a 10,000 square foot building with 2 drive-up windows. They will have a drop off with canopy. They are showing 111 parking spaces which exceeds the requirements. Lot coverage is 56% which is under the allowed. The BJ’s park was to tie into the infrastructure but it wasn’t constructed. They are going to handle their own stormwater on site. They added BMP to the rear and side and an infiltration basin to handle the 100 year storm. They are in discussions on what method of sewer connection. They have been referred to BETA from Veolia and they may tie in if it’s feasible. They will have water & gas from Bay Street. The revised plans show the added trees/shrubbery, double fencing because they want to add town fence so they can maintain it. (there is existing fencing) John asked Jamie if he was able to answer all the items in the City planner’s letter? Jamie said there was a study done and it was presented to Mr. Scanlon. There was a catch basin that was converted to manhole because it didn’t’ lead to anything. The site is monitored but has been decommissioned. They will present easements when they go through the building permit process. Chairman Campbell asked about the sloping and maintenance on basins? Jamie said it’s small and they can get a small bobcat in and they can mow with lawn mower. Chairman Campbell stated he didn’t want mosquitos so he would like to see full operations plan for catch basins. John asked if they had a rendering of building? Joe Baptista answers no. Brian stated there are several homes along Dublin Drive and asked if they are planning on keeping vegetation along Dublin Drive? It was answered they would be keeping the vegetation along Bay Street. They will be putting a 6 foot fence and provide landscaping. John state they are proposing red maples and dwarf white azaleas planted 10 feet apart at 3 inch caliber. It was noted the houses are about 60 – 70 feet away. Brian stated it’s a good project and his questions have been answered. Public Input: No one in favor or opposed. Motion made and seconded to grant the Special Permit//Site Plan Review with the following conditions: Condition #1) That the plans dated September 18, 2020 shall govern with the following additional conditions: Condition #2) Lighting shall not illuminate any portion of abutting properties Condition #3) The site shall be kept clean and clear of debris Condition #4) Two sets of as-builts shall be submitted upon occupancy for all work on site and shall include design engineer and land surveyor certification notes stating the development has been built according to the approved plans. Plans will show all construction of buildings, utilities, grades, setbacks etc. Condition #5) Two sets of updated plans shall be provided that conforms to this decision prior to Building permit Condition #6) Dumpsters shall be located on a concrete pad, enclosed with a 6 foot stockade fence, be kept closed at all times and emptied regularly Condition #7) Water service work will have to be completed by a City licensed Contractor, with road opening and or trench permits. Condition #8) The sanitary sewer connection shall be approved by Veolia prior to any building permits Condition #9) Reciprocal recorded easements for vehicular access and utilities and drainage shall be shown on the plans and copies of said recordings provided prior to any building permits Condition #10) A landscape plan conforming to section 440-702 shall be provided. Existing vegetation remaining shall be clearly defined and all 4 sides are required to have buffers. A 50% waiver has been requested due to the fencing 5 Hearing closed at 7:22 PM Public Hearing – Form J Plan – Waiver of Frontage Requirements – to create two buildable lots on property located on the east side of Tremont Avenue, west side of Davis St. known as Assessor’s Map 53, Lot 302 & 313, submitted by Paul Bourdeau Hearing opens at 7:23 P.M. Roll Call: Carr, Reardon, Lopes, Ackerman, Spencer and Campbell. Chairman Campbell read dept. comments from Engineer, Water Dept., City Planner, Conservation Commission and B.O.H which were placed on file. Brad Fitzgerald, P.E., SFG Associates and Tom Curran representing petitioner. Brad stated this was originally 4 smaller lots and they combined and went to ZBA for approval because lack of sewer so they are forced comply with SRD requirements. They have 120’ frontage on Tremont Ave. but Tremont Avenue is only 20 feet wide paved area. Davis Street is a well traveled road. They will have sufficient access and sufficient lot area for a house. John asked if they reached out to any neighbors and they were waiting for approval. Brian asked if they had any opposition at the ZBA meeting and Brad stated they had petition signed by 9 people in support. Brad noted they are only short 5 feet from the required 125 feet of frontage. It was asked what type of house are they planning on constructing and it was answered a colonial with garage (conceptual only) Public input: No one in favor or opposed. Motion made and seconded to grant the Form J Plan. All in favor. Hearing closed at 7:30 PM Public Hearing - Definitive Subdivision – Brian’s Way – to be located on the south side of Whittenton St., west of Warren Street , property I.D. Map 38, Lot 11 & 23 – to create 7 buildable lots and parcel A (non-buildable) submitted by PWW LLC, ½ Third Ave., Taunton, Ma. Roll Call: Carr, Lopes, Ackerman, Spencer, Reardon and Campbell. Hearing opens at 7:50 PM. Chairman Campbell read the public hearing notice and dept. comments from the Engineer, City Planner, Conservation Commission, and Water Dept. which were placed on file. He also read letter from abutters Mary Ann Costa, Michael Giroux, Michael Groux who were opposed. Jeff Tallman, Sitec Engineer and Kevin Wells, and Atty. Edward Pietnik also present. Jeff stated this project consists of property located on Assessor’s Map 38, lots 11 & 23 which is about 400 feet west of Warren Street. The property is located in the Urban Residential District and slopes from north to south and a little bit to the east. He stated about 15 years ago a 26 unit condo development “Rose Gardens” was proposed but due to the economy was never constructed. There has been a lot of interest in this site and now they are proposing a definitive subdivision with a 425 foot roadway for 7 residential lots. The first 75 feet is sloped towards Whittenton Street and there will be 2 catch basins which run out to swale and the remainder will pitch down to the cul-de-sac. There will be 4 catch basins and a storm deceptor to the detention basin on the south side ultimately running into the wetlands. There are some lots that will need to file a Notice of Intent with Conservation Commission which is scheduled for December 14th. They are requesting waivers for sidewalk on one side and elimination of property boundary radii. Manny asked since property is located in the Urban Residential District what are they proposing, single or duplexes? Jeff answers he’s not sure it depends on what the market dictates. Manny asked if they would be similar to the ones being constructed now? Jeff answers he was not part of that approval process but not aware if they will be constructing 3 story houses? Manny asked about Lot 7 and if they tried to address the issues? Jeff stated they can re-locate the easement. It will drain east to west and there will be no impact. Lot 7 will drain to the west into the wetlands. John asked about snow removal? It was answered they are not showing but they could leave it between lots 4 & 5. The utilities will be underground. It was asked if any traffic study was conducted? Jeff said there was one done in 2006-2007 when they were proposing Rose Gardens and they are proposing less units. Jeff said the site distance is 300’ feet in either direction. Brian had some issues with what is being proposed and it would be a cleaner project if they said what they were going to build, single or duplex? Brian stated in the drainage report it 6 shows topography towards the neighbor’s properties. Jeff answered those houses are higher and there is no change in the topography. Jeff said there is sandy soil and the entrance portion of the site drains towards Whittenton Street. Brian asked how deep the basin in back? Jeff answers 3 feet with a foot outlet. It’s designed to drain within 72 hours but will probably drain sooner. There might be a period where it will hold up to 3 feet of water. Brian suggests fencing around the basin. The plans do not show driveway or house location and the neighbor’s has concerns. Jeff stated the Board is approving the road and utilities and the developer is entitled to build per the zoning ordinance. Brian stated this affects the neighbors while benefiting the developer and he should respect the neighbor’s concerns. Brian said he doesn’t’ want to approve a blank slate. He wants the neighbor’s concerns’ satisfied. Chairman Campbell asked if the Site distance done for Rose Gardens was field measured at the start line of the road 14 feet behind the travel way Jeff answers yes. Chairman Campbell suggesting putting condition to request they run it from 524 and 528 Whittenton Street. Chairman Campbell also pointed out the detention basin is on 2 lots and the planning Board is not going to approve an unbuildable lot so he suggests combining the detention basin lot with one of the other lots. It will then be the owner’s responsibility to maintain it. The City doesn’t accept detention basins or form a homeowner’s association. Chairman Campbell states it will keep people from throwing anything in there he suggests combining with lot 4. Dennis states he’s not ready to vote tonight based on the plans needed updates. There was discussion from Board and they would like to the plans updated to show the following: site distance, change drainage system, show underground utilities, show snow easement, show detention basin lot combined with another lot, show 2 sidewalks. Manny agrees he wants to see what it’s going to look like. Dennis stated by right under the zoning they can put duplexes. Manny thinks the lots are too small and it was mentioned they are in the Urban Residential District and the lots meet the minimum 15,000 sq. ft. lot size. Chairman Campbell asked if they had any indication of what will be constructed, single or duplex? He also pointed out they will need a waiver of corner rounding curb radius from 30’ to 15’. Public Input: Frank & Mary Ann Costa, 536 Whittenton Sreet called in to say she talked to the developer and they are putting a 4 foot tree behind her 6 foot fence. She would like to see arborvitaes for privacy. They have a pool and have concerns about water runoff. Frank said he talked to developer and was told they were going to build one level house. He asked if they were planning on any sidewalks? There is a lot of development going in namely the mobile home park on Bassett Street and another subdivision down the road? He hopes the builders is held accountable. Jeff stated they can shift the drainage over between lots 6 & 7 and add house location to the plans. Mary Ann Costa asked what kind of homes will they be building? Atty. Edward Pietnik representing developer stated the developer actually spoke to the Costas and indicated they will NOT be building 3 story homes but they are proposing duplexes. Jeff stated they are willing to put 7 foot arborvitaes spaced 4 feet apart behind the Costa’s home and behind #528 and 536 Whittenton Street. Chairman Campbell asked if he submitted the pictures of the fencing and Atty. Pietnik stated he won’t get into that. A.J. Brandon, 3 Warren Street had concerns about the traffic study done 15 years ago? There is now more homes in the neighborhood and a lot more traffic. He stated the buildings under construction now are unsightly and they were promised one thing and something else was build. He agrees with the abutters letters and asked if any plantings along Whittenton Street was being proposed? Chairman Campbell asked there were any discussion about plantings along Warren Street? He suggests they consider it. It was suggested keep public input open and continue until to next month. Brian made motion to continue to next month and keep public input open. Seconded by Arthur. All in favor. Cont’d to January 7, 2021 meeting. Public Meeting – Site Plan Review – 6 W. Summer St. – 4 unit dwelling in a Urban Residential District, submitted by Jacky Fils. Atty. Dan deAbreu, Richard Reid, P.E. Lighthouse Land Surveying Co., and Jacky Fils. Atty. deAbreu stated they are converting the existing 2 family to a 4 family and they obtained ZBA approval. This Board 7 sent a positive recommendation to the Municipal Council for their public hearing. Atty. deAbreu asks the Board to not include the condition about paving because Conservation Commission approved it without paving. Chairman Campbell read dept. comments from the DIRB, Engineer, Water, and Historic District Commission which was placed on file. Atty. deAbreu stated they have 2 parking spaces for each unit and he thinks it will be a good fit for the neighborhood. It was noted they would need to pay the I & I Fees to connect to sewer. Richard stated they will be retaining the existing grades when they remove pavement and replace with gravel parking area. Public Input: No one in favor or opposed. John made motion, seconded by Dennis to grant the Site Plan Review with the following conditions: Condition #1) That the plans dated April 21, 2020 shall govern with the following additional conditions; Condition #2) Lighting shall not illuminate any portion of abutting properties Condition #3) The site shall be kept clean and clear of debris Condition #4) Two sets of as-builts shall be submitted upon occupancy for all work on site and shall include design engineer and land surveyor certification notes stating the development has been built according to the approved plans. Plans will show all construction of buildings, utilities, grades, setbacks etc. Condition #5) Two sets of updated plans shall be provided that conforms to this decision prior to Building permit Condition #6) No dumpster Condition #7) Water service work will have to be completed by a City licensed Contractor, with road opening and or trench permits if needed. Condition #8) Compliance with Conservation Commission Order of Conditions #2860 is required Condition #9) Compliance with the state sanitary code is required Condition #10) Remove the minus from the lot area Condition #11) The expansion of the parking areas shall be pervious in nature. No paving. Condition #12) A Change of Use permit is required from the Building Department Condition #13) The additional units will require a new infiltration/Inflow fee which can be obtained through the Department Of Public Works. Condition #14) The existing grading cannot be altered without compensatory storage. All in favor. Special Permit – 46 Harrison St. – 6 unit multi-family dwelling with a place of worship in the Office District and Urban Residential district, submitted by Bradley Thomas. Need to forward recommendation to the Municipal Council. Lester Wade representing petitioner. Chairman Campbell read dept. comments from the Engineer, Conservation Commission, TMLP, Water Dept. Veolia Water which were placed on file. Lester stated this is the property that had fire and the entire building was destroyed. They presented plans showing parking for the place of worship as well as residential parking. They will be adding fencing along the property line to the left. The demo of the building was done in an emergency and the water & sewer was probably not done correctly. It was suggested consider a 6 foot fence because an 8 foot fence must meet setbacks. The Board needs to send a recommendation to the council for their public hearing. Lester stated on an average day 15 people will be attending the services. They meet 5 times a day and worst case scenario 1 or 2 days the house of worship will be full. Brian’s only issue is that there is no parking on Harrison St. and Winthrop Street and he suggests putting signs up. It was asked if the 6 unit residential part of the building will be single or 2 story and it was answered 2 story. Chairman Campbell’s only concern is the corner of the building is close to the 8 edge of travel way. It was suggested moving or reducing that corner of the building and they were agreeable. Brian stated he would like to see designated parking spaces for the resident use. Dennis made motion, seconded by Manny to forward a positive recommendation with the following conditions: 1. Designated parking spaces for the residential use. 2. Add walkway to entrance to the House of Worship 3. Add No Parking Signs along the entire frontage of property (along Winthrop St. & Harrison Street) All in favor. Public Meeting - Site Plan Review -425 Constitution Drive - for the construction of three building additions with a total aggregate area of 33,923 sq. ft. to compliment an existing office/warehouse facility, submitted by Mountain Dog Operating d/b/a Nova Coldstone Ken Motta, Project Manager, Field Engineer representing petitioner. Chairman Campbell read dept. comments from the DIRB, TMLP, Historic District Commission, Engineer, Veolia Water and Conservation Commission which were placed on file. Ken stated this is an expansion for Cold Storage and this was the original Rich’s Transportation site which when developed when they could not have parking in front so they had 2 segregated parking areas in the back. Ken stated they will as part of this project consolidate parking and make it more ADA compliant. They have 44 spaces and they will increase to 83 spaces. He stated they will have stormwater Management plan and they will be making improvements with roof drains and landscaping. They received ZBA approval for a rear setback variance. They have no conservation issues. Public Input: No one in favor or opposed. John made motion, seconded by Arthur to approve the Site Plan Review with the dept. comments. Condition #1) That the plans dated November 6, 2020 and revised through November 24, 2020 shall govern with the following additional conditions; Condition #2) Lighting shall not illuminate any portion of abutting properties Condition #3) The site shall be kept clean and clear of debris Condition #4) Two set of as-builts shall be submitted upon occupancy for all work on site and shall include design engineer and land surveyor certification notes stating the development has been built according to the approved plans. Plans will show all construction of buildings, utilities, grades, setbacks etc Condition #5) Two sets of updated plans shall be provided that conforms to this decision prior to Building permit Condition #6) Any dumpsters shall be located on a concrete pad, enclosed with a 6 foot stockade fence, be kept closed at all times and emptied regularly Condition #7) Any water service work will have to be completed by a City licensed Contractor, with road opening and or trench permits and shall follow DPW water specifications and procedures Condition #8) A utility as built shall be filed with the City Condition #9) Compliance with ZBA case # 3570 is required All in favor. 9 Public Meeting - Site Plan Review – 295 Broadway lot 1 –reconsideration – for the establishment of a 3,680 sq ft. retail marijuana dispensary, submitted by GTE Taunton Realty LLC, Chirag Patel, and owned by Albert Tucan. Requesting to continue to next month. Motion made and seconded to grant continuance. All in favor Leonard Court Discontinuance – Need to forward a recommendation to Municipal Council Letter from Law Dept. to Municipal Council for discontinuance due to the City Hall Project. Manny made motion to forward a positive recommendation to the discontinue Leonard Court, Seconded by Brian. All in favor. Logan Drive – Request to release lots 1, 2, &4 – Chairman Campbell read letters from the City Engineer, Outside Consultant which were placed on file. Chris Moniz, representing Aspen Properties stated they are requesting release of 3 lots on Logan Drive. The construction timeline is tight and they would like the Board to consider releasing lots upon completion of work. He stated the water main was flush tested today Chairman Campbell stated the Board does not normally release any lots until the binder course is down. The gravel access is not conforming. Chris stated the gravel is scheduled for this week and asphalt the next week. They have already been to conservation and this will allow them to apply for building permit. The estimated completion cost is $95,000. Dennis made motion to release lots upon receipt of $200,000 surety subject to confirmation from City Engineer that binder course is down. Manny stated there is a reason we have outside consultants and he is going to agree with them and not approve until work is done. Motion did not receive any second. John agrees he’s not wanting to release any lots. Motion made and seconded to deny request, seconded by Arthur. 6 members in favor, Dennis opposed. Motion passed, request denied. Chairman Campbell didn’t think it was fair that the outside consultant and City Engineer would need to re- inspect because the stated work was not done. Meeting adjourned at 10:19 PM 10