Muyni
← Back to Troy

Troy Industrial Development Authority

Regular Meeting

Troy, NY · June 13, 2014

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Troy Industrial Development Authority June 13, 2014 10:30 AM Meeting Minutes Present: Bill Dunne, Lou Anthony, Hon. Dean Bodnar, Mary O’Neill, Hon. Robert Doherty, Tina Urzan and Lisa Kyer Absent: Steve Bouchey and Paul Carroll Also in attendance: Monica Kurzejeski, Francine Vero, Elizabeth Young, Larry Novak, Kate Jarosh, Jeff Buell, Selena Skiba, and Denee Zeigler In the absence of a Chairman and Vice Chair, Lou Anthony was voted temporary chairman of the meeting. Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to elect Lou Anthony as temporary Chairman. Lisa Kyer seconded the motion, motion carried. Lou Anthony called the meeting to order at 10:50 a.m. I. Minutes from the May 9, 2014 meeting Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the minutes from the May 9, 2014 meeting. Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried. II. Dauchy River Triangle building Bill Dunne introduced Larry Novak to the board to discuss his project. Mr. Novak spoke about Dauchy River Triangle LLC’s application for financial assistance for the River Triangle Building. Mr. Novak advised this project would be similar to their other projects except the 1st and 2nd floors will be offices and the 3rd and 4th floors will be residential. He advised that there will be about 29 units and they should be completed by the end of September 2014. Tina Urzan asked about the possible terms of the PILOT. Mr. Dunne advised it will be a 15 year PIOLT. The first seven years will be paying the current assessment of the building. From the eighth year on, a certain percentage will be added in until they reach the full payment amount. Hon. Bob Doherty and Mary O’Neil asked for PILOT payment schedules to be included in the packets. Mr. Dunne advised they usually are and advised that one would be sent out after the meeting. Hon. Dean Bodnar made a motion to accept the application for assistance for the River Triangle Building. Hon. Bob Doherty seconded the motion, motion carried. 1 III. Ironworks Jeff Buell from Sequence Development introduced Elizabeth Young from his company and Tim O’Byrne of Omni Development. Mr. Buell talked about the redevelopment of the Hy Rosenblum center on the corner of Morrison and Vandenburgh Avenues. Mr. Buell explained that they were awarded the project by HVCC after an RFP was sent out last winter. They are proposing to demolish the former monastery and create a 330 bed student housing facility. The facility will be specifically for students at HVCC. Mr. Buell advised that the first phase will be for college students specifically, some family housing may come into play in a later phase. He advised that he hopes the demolition can begin in the next few months and be under construction this fall to be open next August. Mr. Buell advised that once completed, the vacant property will be privately owned and be on the tax rolls for the first time. They are currently in the SEQR process and are holding public meetings. Mr. Dunne wanted to note that the building was not built in the 1700’s, it was actually built in the 1950’s. Hon. Dean Bodnar also commented on the style of the building. Mr. Buell advised that the building has no historical value. They did spend time seeing if be re-configured to fit the required 300 students. It was determined that demolishing and rebuilding was a better fit. He advised that some changes will be made to the intersection to make it more pedestrian friendly. Tina Urzan asked about the future design of the building. Mr. Buell explained that it will be new construction that will have some of the same elements of HVCC’s new science center. Hon. Bob Doherty asked about the overall direction of Omni Development. Tim O’Byrne advised that they do a lot of different types of development work and partner with many other agencies. Mr. O’Byrne advised that in this case HVCC doesn’t have a managing entity. Mr. Buell added that community colleges are not able to own student housing. This would be a private development with Omni Development as the managing entity. The two companies will work together to ensure the design of the building works for student housing. Mr. Urzan asked if it will be strictly students. Mr. Buell advised yes. About 25% of the students will be from Rensselaer County. Many will be from Albany County and some will be from out of the area. Mr. Doherty asked if the project will be specifically tailored for students. He questioned if would it be changed into a different form of housing if there was a change in demographics. Mr. Buell advised that it will be designed specifically for students and not able to be transformed into multifamily housing. Mrs. Urzan asked what they anticipate for rents each month. Mr. Buell explained they will be approximately $665 per student for a four bedroom and $765 for a one bedroom. Mary O’Neill asked if they would be able to stay there for the entire year. Mr. Buell advised the students will be signing a 12 month lease. Mrs. Urzan asked about parking. Mr. Buell explained that the parking ratio will be one parking spot for every two beds. He mentioned that there is about an eight minute walk to campus and bus rides are free. Mrs. Urzan asked if there were any other plans to develop the remainder of the parcel explaining that it continues down Morrison and Vandenburgh. Mr. Buell explained that there may be some further development at some point. He added that there is another developable portion of the lot, however it is the former site of the burden family home and contains significant archeological findings. Mr. Buell advised that there would be significant cost to developing that site. He 2 added that if that site was developed it would leave the monastery vacant and not usable. Mr. Bodnar questioned the freestanding building on the site. Mr. Buell explained that is part of the campus that had received a grant and cannot be changed for ten years from the date of the grant. Lisa Kyer asked about the details of the PILOT. Mr. Dunne advised that this is just the initial review of the application. There will be further discussions with the applicant regarding the terms of the PILOT agreement. The board thanked the applicants and expressed interest working with them. IV. Ingalls Avenue Development Project Bill Dunne gave a brief update to the board members about the on the Ingalls Avenue Development project and the condemnation process for the Mlock parcel. Mr. Dunne advised that the process has been started and a public hearing will be held in July. Mr. Bodnar asked about the most recent appraisal. Mr. Dunne advised that it was last at $340,000 but did not consider the condition of the site. Once those were applied, it was brought down to $265,000. The board had a general discussion on the project and the surrounding sites that will be developed at the same time. Monica Kurzejeski spoke about the current status of 701 River Street. She advised that it was put up for sale about a month ago and believes it is currently under contract. Mr. Bodnar asked about the timeframe of the condemnation process. Mr. Dunne advised he has a timeline of the process and will forward to the board members. He noted it is usually around four months. V. Review of bylaws Mr. Dunne asked the board members if they had a chance to review the bylaws and if so were there any changes that needed to be made. The board had no changes at this time. VI. Financials Selena Skiba went over the current financials with the board. Mr. Dunne spoke about the waiving of PILOT late fees for one of the recipients. He advised that based on the boards decision and the language of the PILOT agreement it was determined that the late fee should be waived. Lisa Kyer asked if the language has been corrected going forward. Mr. Dunne advised yes. The PILOT in question was one of the first ones. Mrs. Skiba questioned the pending sale of IBT and how we should proceed in collecting the balance. Mr. Anthony advised that the sale has been finalized. Mr. Dunne advised invoices will be sent and he will ask the legal representative to follow up with them. Mr. Bodnar asked if the previous owner was aware that the loan would need to be paid back. Mrs. Kurzejeski noted that she has had conversations with IBT. VII. 273 River Street Park Access Mr. Dunne gave the board an update about the Riverfront Park Access project. Work has been stopped due to an unknown substance that was found while digging. It has been sent to NYS DEC for testing. Mr. Anthony noted that there is a possibility that it is not contaminated. Mr. Dunne explained that once they get the results, they will have a better timeframe for the project. 3 VIII. Adjournment Hon. Dean Bodnar made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 a.m. 4

Agenda

Vice-Chair Troy Steve Bouchey Industrial Development Authority Board Members Hon. Dean Bodnar And Mr. Paul Carroll Capital Resource Corporation Hon. Robert Doherty BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Louis Anthony June 13, 2014 Mary O’Neill 10:30 a.m. Lisa Kyer Planning Department Conference Tina Urzan Room City Hall AGENDA I. Approval of Minutes from the May 9, 2014 IDA board meeting and committees and the CRC board meeting. IDA II. River Triangle Building application (Bill) III. The Ironworks, HVCC student housing development (Bill) IV. Ingalls Avenue Development Project (Bill) V. Review of PILOTs (Bill) VI. Review of Bylaws (Bill) VII. Financials (Selena/Joe) VIII. New Business City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180 Phone: 518.279.7166 City of Troy Industrial Development Authority May 9, 2014 10:30 AM Meeting Minutes Present: Steve Bouchey, Bill Dunne, Hon. Dean Bodnar, Mary O’Neill, Hon. Robert Doherty, Paul Carroll, Tina Urzan and Lisa Kyer Absent: Lou Anthony Also in attendance: Monica Kurzejeski, Justin Miller Esq., Selena Skiba, and Denee Zeigler Vice Chair, Steve Bouchey, called the IDA portion of the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m. I. Minutes from the April 11, 2014 meeting Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the minutes from the April 11, 2014 meeting. Hon. Bob Doherty seconded the motion, motion carried. II. 33 Second Street Bill Dunne spoke to the board about the recent purchase of 33 Second Street by Sonny Bonacio. It appears that both restaurants will stay and residential apartments will be located on the upper floors. The board had general discussion on the two businesses currently in the building. Steve Bouchey said that he was happy to hear that it was purchased. III. IBT loan Bill Dunne advised the board members that IBT received a loan from the IDA to encourage the expansion of the business and retain jobs in Troy. They have recently relocated their business and the building is for sale. Mr. Dunne explained that they would like to get the balance of the loan paid back from the proceeds of the sale of the building. Justin Miller advised that there is approximately $150,000 remaining on the loan. Mr. Miller advised that Greco is planning to buy it and allow IBT to continue to lease the space for storage for about six months. Mr. Dunne advised that Greco construction and MMC will both be occupying the site and will bring about 40 new jobs to Troy. Mr. Dunne advised that board member Lou Anthony is vice president of Greco construction and will recues himself from any future discussions or votes on the project. The board had a general discussion about the best way to pursue the repayment of the loan. IV. Riverfront Park Access 1 Bill Dunne spoke on the project to date. He advised that the deck was completely removed without a problem. Originally there were concerns that there could be damage to the adjacent buildings but thankfully that was not the case. Mr. Dunne advised that they are currently installing reinforcements to the retaining wall that currently holds up River Street. The board expressed excitement about the project. Mr. Bouchey stated that it will offer a great connection to the park from the businesses on River Street. Mr. Doherty asked how wide the access was going to be. Mr. Dunne advised that it is about 35 ft. across with the stairs taking up about half of the width. They stairs will go halfway down then there will be landing and then the stairs will continue down to the park. They will be lit and have security cameras installed. Mr. Dunne explained that the iron work archway will be added at another time. The project should be completed by the end of the summer. V. Ingalls Avenue Development project Justin Miller introduced a resolution to the board which outlined the project on Ingalls Avenue. Mr. Miller suggested that the project details be discussed in executive session because it involves real estate matters. Mr. Bouchey asked if for a motion to move to executive session at this time to discuss real estate matters. Lisa Kyer made the motion to move to executive session to discuss real estate matters. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. Hon. Bob Doherty made the motion to adjourn executive session with no action taken. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. The board continued their discussion about the project. Mr. Bouchey asked the board if they had any additional questions. Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to approve the resolution for the Ingalls Avenue Development project. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. VI. Financials Selena Skiba went over the current financials and discussed outstanding PILOTs with the board members. Mrs. Skiba advised the board that a letter was received from Troy Living LLC asking to waive late fees from their late payment. The letter indicated that they did not receive the invoice and always pay on time without any issue. Hon. Bob Doherty asked how much the fee was. Mrs. Skiba advised that the fee amount is $883.00. Mr. Bouchey advised that he is in favor of waiving the fee noting that they have been good tenants. Mary O’Neil noted that once taxes are due, they are due. Lisa Kyer questioned if there was a mandatory 5% or if there was a grace period that he would legally be responsible for. Mrs. Skiba asked if she is required to send out invoices. Mr. Miller advised that they are not obligated. In the agreement, it states that the payment is due on a certain date or a penalty is imposed. It could set an unwanted precedent. Mr. Miller advised he should be responsible for the fee. 2 Monica Kurzejeski suggested that we send a letter explaining our position. Hon. Dean Bodnar asked if we were sending bills. Mrs. Skiba advised yes. Mrs. Urzan asked if automatic withdrawal was a possibility. Mrs. Skiba advised no. Mr. Bouchey took an informal vote to see if the board members would be interested in waiving the fees. The board members expressed an interest in having a vote. Mr. Bouchey asked the board if they agree to waive the penalty fees of $883.00 for Troy Living, LLC. 4 yes, 3 no. Mr. Miller advised he will look into and send out a letter. Hon. Bob Doherty spoke in favor of the positive changes that have occurred in the area of the Troy Living LLC project and encouraged some discussion with them regarding the fee whether they waive it or not. Mrs. Skiba spoke about IBT's late payments. Mr. Miller advised that he will send them out a letter advising payment due and intentions to collect the balance due. Mrs. Kurzejeski asked how long we usually wait before going back to collecting full taxes on a PILOT that is not making payments. Mr. Miller noted that it is usually 30 days after the default letter is sent, however, there is no timeframe established to send the default letter. Mrs. Kurzejeski suggested that they board discuss a specific timeframe to send a default letter. Mr. Miller recommended sending a default notice after 30 days. It is already in the language. Policy can be enforced after payment not received within 30 days. Mr. Miller also suggested sending notice to the bank or other lenders that have noticed rights. VII. Adjournment Mr. Bouchey asked if there were any other items before they adjourn to the CRC. Paul Carroll made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. The IDA portion of the meeting was adjourned at 11:15 a.m. 3 City of Troy Capital Resource Corporation May 9, 2014 11:15 AM Meeting Minutes Present: Steve Bouchey, Bill Dunne, Hon. Dean Bodnar, Mary O’Neill, Hon. Robert Doherty, Paul Carroll, Tina Urzan and Lisa Kyer Absent: Lou Anthony Also in attendance: Monica Kurzejeski, Justin Miller Esq., Selena Skiba, and Denee Zeigler Vice Chair, Steve Bouchey, called the CRC meeting to order at 11:15 a.m. I. Land Bank Funding Monica Kurzejeski spoke about the land bank and advised the board that everything is in draft form at this point. They are currently mapping out clusters of areas to develop. Mrs. Kurzejeski advised that the LDC approved $50,000 at their meeting to go towards the start up of the program. Mrs. Kurzejeski noted that the board will be compromised of two people from the school board, four from the council and four appointed by the Mayor. Mrs. Kurzejeski advised that Article 16 has requirements that elected officials could serve on the board, but are not required. The City will run for the first stages of the program. Once up and running someone will be chosen to run the program. Mrs. Kurzejeski advised an interim director will be named soon. Hon. Bob Doherty asked if it would be a paid position. Mrs. Kurzejeski explained not in the beginning, but once the land bank is established yes. Mr. Doherty asked if Schenectady has a paid director. Mrs. Kurzejeski advised that Schenectady waited two years before deciding to elect a paid position. Many agreements will have to be made with schools, City, etc. It will help to create good properties in the end. Mr. Doherty spoke about Schenectady’s program and how the council explored the idea. He noted even a part time director of the land bank will help greatly. The banks have a long period of time that goes by when it becomes vacant and that is when the buildings can get run down. Mrs. Kurzejeski explained that the land bank program can step in and help the properties from falling into disrepair. Schenectady has challenges because they partnered with another City. For us, it will be only one City. The land bank funding has to be requested by a not for profit that is not the City or LDC. It’s a competitive process with one slot left in this round. Mr. Doherty suggested setting up a rent to own program. Mrs. Kurzejeski advised that she has had conversations with THA about their Section 8 home ownership program. Tina Urzan spoke about issues she has seen where a low income person is able to become a firs time homebuyer, but cannot pay the taxes and end up losing the property. Mrs. Kurzejeski 1 advised that the land bank will help with that component. Mr. Bouchey thanked Mrs. Kurzejeski for her presentation. Tina Urzan made the motion to approve start up funding for the Land Bank in the amount of $50,000. Hon. Bob Doherty seconded the motion, motion carried. II. Adjournment Mr. Bouchey asked if there were any items to discuss before they adjourn the CRC meeting. The board had no other items to discuss. Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. The CRC meeting was adjourned at 11:35 a.m. 2 Project Description and Employment Summary Sheet Company Name: Dauchy River Triangle LLC Address: 18 Division St, Suite 401, Saratoga Springs, NY Project Address: River Triangle Building, 264-274 River Street, Troy, NY 12180 This project will consist of the partial rehabilitation of the River Triangle Project Description: Building, 264-274 River Street. Project use and size (as appropriate) Currently seven commercial tenants on 1st and 2nd floors. Use of space Nine residential apartments will be added to the 3rd and 4th floors. Property owned or leased Owned Square footage n/a Project Costs Land $450,000 Buildings $1,515,235 Machinery and equipment cost Utilities, roads and appurtenant costs Architects and engineering fees $71,500 Costs of bonds issue (legal, financial and printing) Construction loan fees and interest (if applicable) $100,000 Other (please specify) $163,265 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $2,300,000 Employment Existing job strength Professional: 13 Full Time Technicians: Administrative/Support: 8 Part time Entry Level: Full Part Anticipated workforce levels Time Time Professional or (1-2 years) Managerial: 22 Unskilled or Skilled: 12 Semi-Skilled: TOTALS 22 12 Type of Assistance Expected from the Authority Financing Is the applicant requesting that the Authority issue bonds to assist in financing the Project? ____ Yes __X__ No If yes, indicate: a. Amount of loan requested: $_____; and b. Maturity requested: _____ years. Tax Benefits Is the applicant requesting any real property tax exemption __X_ Yes _____ No Is the applicant expecting that the financing of the Project will be secured by one or more mortgages? _____ Yes _X_ No Total Amount of financing to be secured by mortgages $_____________ Agent of Authority? _X_ Yes _____ No Approximate amount of purchases that applicant expects to be exempt:: $_1,526,880___ Estimated value of each type of tax exemption: a. NYS Sales and Compensating Use Taxes $36,000__________ b. Mortgage Recording Taxes $________________ c. Real Property Tax Exemptions: $400,000 (current assessment) d. Other (please specify) $________________ PILOT __X__ Yes _____ No PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION (Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC – River Triangle Building Redevelopment Project) A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was convened on June 13, 2014, at 10:30 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the following members of the Authority were: MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT Wallace Altes Hon. Dean Bodnar Hon. Robert Doherty Steve Bouchey Louis Anthony Paul Carroll Mary O’Neill Lisa Kyer Tina Urzan The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a proposed project for the benefit of Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC. On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority: Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent Wallace Altes Hon. Dean Bodnar Hon. Robert Doherty Steve Bouchey Louis Anthony Paul Carroll Mary O’Neill Lisa Kyer Tina Urzan Page 1 of 9 Resolution No. 14-4-____ RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT OF DAUCHY/RIVER TRIANGLE, LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT; (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT (“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and equipping civic, industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, DAUCHY/RIVER TRIANGLE, LLC (the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold or other interest in a certain parcel of real property located at 264- 276 River Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.53-3-1.21) and the existing improvements located thereon, including an approximately 18,000 square foot, multi-story building known as the “River Triangle Building (the “Existing Improvements”); (B) the renovation, reconstruction, refurbishing and equipping by the Company as agent of the Authority of the Existing Improvements to provide for multi- tenanted commercial facility and 9 market rate apartment units, including the reconfiguration of existing commercial space to accommodate upgraded commercial and retail spaces and apartment units, along with the installation and improvement of common areas, heating systems, plumbing, roofs, windows and other site and infrastructure improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), all of the foregoing intended for the Company’s ownership and operation of the Improvements as a mixed-use commercial, retail and housing facility that will be leased by the Company to commercial, retail and residential tenants; (C) the acquisition of and installation in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain machinery, fixtures, equipment and other items of tangible personal property (the “Equipment” and, collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (D) the lease of the Authority’s interest in the Facility back to the Company; and WHEREAS, by resolution adopted February 14, 2014 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling, notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and (iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Page 2 of 9 Authority with respect to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled, noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:30 a.m. on April 11, 2014, whereat all interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or in writing, on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing and Contemplated Deviation being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, the Planning Commission of the City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”), previously reviewed the Project and on October 10, 2013 adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”) with respect to the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated a lease agreement (the “Lease Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related payment- in-lieu-of-tax agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set forth within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the Company agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the term of the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of Financial Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating to one or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines that: (A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all powers granted to it under the Act; and (B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the Act; and Page 3 of 9 (C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and (D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and (E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission and determined the Project involves an “Unlisted Action” as said term is defined under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the Negative Declaration, related Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the SEQRA determination made by the Planning Commission and the Authority further finds that (i) the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA. Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement. Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and Page 4 of 9 acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts, orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and local sales and use tax in an amount up to $1,526,880.00, which result in New York State and local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed $122,150.40. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s). Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture Event”). As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority, cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority. Page 5 of 9 Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A) the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Authority, (B) the Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the Company, (C) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions (along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement), and (C) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project. Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents, security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same, all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project. Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees, charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms, covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority. Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately. Page 6 of 9 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF RENSSELAER ) I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the Resolution contained therein, held on June 13, 2014, with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters therein referred to. I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout said meeting. I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Authority this ____ day of __________, 2014. ______________________________ (SEAL) Page 7 of 9 EXHIBIT A PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS Page 8 of 9 EXHIBIT B SEQRA MATERIALS Page 9 of 9 Project Description and Employment Summary Sheet Company Name: Ironworks Housing LLC Address: 40 Beaver Street, Albany NY Project Address: Corner of Morrison and Vandenburgh Ave, Troy NY 4 floors, 98 apartments 328 bed student housing facility for HVCC students Project use and size (as appropriate) Student Housing Development Use of space Property owned or leased Owned by HVCC Square footage 13 Acres Project Costs Land $635,000 Buildings $15,570,000 Machinery and equipment cost $918,000 Utilities, roads and appurtenant costs $1,600,000 Architects and engineering fees $1,217,000 Costs of bonds issue (legal, financial and printing) N/A Construction loan fees and interest (if applicable) $839,000 Other (please specify) N/A TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $20,779,000 Employment Existing job strength Professional: 0 Full Time Technicians: Administrative/Support: 0 Part time Entry Level: Full Part Anticipated workforce levels Time Time Professional or (1-2 years) Managerial: 7 2 Unskilled or Skilled: Semi-Skilled: TOTALS 7 2 Type of Assistance Expected from the Authority Financing Is the applicant requesting that the Authority issue bonds to assist in financing the Project? ____ Yes __X__ No If yes, indicate: a. Amount of loan requested: $_____; and b. Maturity requested: _____ years. Tax Benefits Is the applicant requesting any real property tax exemption __X_ Yes _____ No Is the applicant expecting that the financing of the Project will be secured by one or more mortgages? _X_ Yes ___ No Total Amount of financing to be secured by mortgages $_15,564,000_ Agent of Authority? _X_ Yes _____ No Approximate amount of purchases that applicant expects to be exempt:: $______________ Estimated value of each type of tax exemption: a. NYS Sales and Compensating Use Taxes $___656,000_______ b. Mortgage Recording Taxes $___165,000_______ c. Real Property Tax Exemptions: $_________________ d. Other (please specify) $________________ PILOT _X__ Yes _____ No INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION (Ironworks Housing LLC Project) A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was convened on June 13, 2014 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman and, upon roll being called, the following members of the Authority were: MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT Hon. Dean Bodnar Hon. Robert Doherty Steve Bouchey Louis Anthony Paul Carroll Mary O’Neill Lisa Kyer Tina Urzan The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Vice Chairman announced that among the purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a proposed project for the benefit of Omni Housing Development LLC and/or Ironworks Housing LLC. On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority: Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent Hon. Dean Bodnar Hon. Robert Doherty Steve Bouchey Louis Anthony Paul Carroll Mary O’Neill Lisa Kyer Tina Urzan Page 1 of 5 Resolution No. ____ RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF OMNI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LLC SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF IRONWORKS HOUSING LLC (COLLECTIVELY, THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii) AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii) DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and equipping civic, industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, OMNI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed including IRONWORKS HOUSING LLC ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately 13 acres of real property located at 45 Vandenburgh Avenue at the corner of Morrison Avenue and Vandenburgh Avenue, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as a portion of TMID No. 112.69-1-10) and the existing site and infrastructure improvements located thereon being comprised of five (5) buildings containing approximately 91,793 square feet of space along with existing site improvements (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the demolition of portions of the Existing Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction, operation and maintenance upon the Land and around the Existing Improvements of a four (4) story residential facility including ninety-eight (98) units of rental residential housing, approximately 8,000 square feet of common area space, along with related exterior access and egress improvements, parking, curbage, site work and landscaping improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), such Improvements to be known as “The Ironworks”, and (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and Page 2 of 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is contemplating with respect to the Project; and WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines that: (A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all powers granted to it under the Act; and (B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the Act; and (C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and (D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated. Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice Page 3 of 5 and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or deliver) the terms of (A) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title to the Land and Project), (B) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (C) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (D) related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation have been complied with. Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees, charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms, covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority. Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately. Page 4 of 5 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF RENSSELAER ) I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the Resolution contained therein, held on June 13, 2014, with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters therein referred to. I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout said meeting. I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Authority this ____ day of __________, 2014. ______________________________ (SEAL) Page 5 of 5

Get email alerts for Troy

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting