Troy Industrial Development Authority
Regular MeetingTroy, NY · March 20, 2015
Minutes
City of Troy
Industrial Development Authority
March 20, 2015
10:30 AM
Meeting Minutes
Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Bill Dunne, Steve Bouchey, Lou Anthony, Tina Urzan, Hon.
Dean Bodnar, and Kathy Ceitek
Absent: Paul Carroll, Lisa Kyer and Hon. Robert Doherty
Also in attendance: Justin Miller, Paul Goetz, Andrew Piotrowski, Tom Rossi, Selena
Skiba, Ken Crowe, Sharon Martin, Joe Baniak and Denee Zeigler
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m.
I. Public Hearing ‐ South Lake Avenue Associates, LLC
(please see attached Public Hearing Agenda for minutes)
Tina Urzan made a motion to close the public hearing
portion of the meeting.
Steve Bouchey seconded the motion, motion carried.
II. Minutes from the February 13, 2015 board meeting
The board reviewed the minutes from the January 13, 2015 board meeting.
Justin Miller advised that Prout Street should be updated to Prout Ave. and asked
that the minutes and resolution be updated to reflect this.
Lou Anthony made a motion to approve the January 13, 2015
meeting minutes with the above noted corrections.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
III. South Lake Avenue Associates – Authorizing Resolution
The Chairman asked the board if there were any other questions related to Tom
Rossi’s project on South Lake Ave and Prout Ave. Tina Urzan asked Mr. Rossi
how his other projects were coming along. Mr. Rossi advised the Watervliet
project is currently underway and they hired a construction company for that
job. Mrs. Urzan asked when that building will be ready for people to move in.
He advised the Fall of 2015. (See attached Authorizing Resolution 03/15 #1)
Hon. Dean Bodnar made a motion to approve the Authorizing
Resolution for South Lake Avenue Associates, LLC.
Lou Anthony seconded the motion, motion carried.
The Chairman commented on the process of PILOT applications and advised
going forward, the board will have an opportunity to review the final PILOT and
make comments before the public meeting.
1
IV. Audit Presentation by SaxBST
Paul Goetz from SaxBST presented the IDA audit. He advised that they have
worked with over 30 agencies, small and large, over the years. We have been
the auditors for the past six years. Mr. Goetz advised that he will be walking the
board through the DRAFT audit and explained it is labeled DRAFT, pending board
approval. Once it is approved by the board and the representation letter is
created by Joe Mazzariello, it will be uploaded to the NYS ABO website.
Mr. Goetz advised the board to take a look at the third page of the auditor’s
report. It indicates that the board received an unqualified opinion, which is the
highest level of assurance an auditor can give. He went over the statement of
net position or balance sheet as of 12/31/2014 and 12/31/2013. Mr. Goetz
pointed out some highlights for 2014. He indicated receivables that were due
back to the City of Troy for PILOT pass through payments. He also noted the
amount due from other governments different than 2013.
Mr. Goetz went over the revenues and expenses. The first item, administrative
fees, shows the amount received by all six of the approved projects. The second
item is the grant revenue. It shows the amount due from The City of Troy for
reimbursement of the 273 Riverfront Park Access project. He advised that the
City is in the process of applying for the reimbursement money. The next item is
on the expense side, economic development is listed. He advised that the
amount has gone up considerably due to the Riverfront Park Access Park project.
Mr. Goetz explained that the administrative support line is for reimbursement of
staffing and has gone up. Another item to review is bad debts. He advised that
the amount for doubtful accounts was increased in 2014. For operating
expenses, it shows a loss of about $300,000 for 2014-principally due to the
economic development activity. Mr. Goetz advised that the remainder of the
report consists of footnotes that are meant to give additional information. He
advised the board to take a look at note 4 on page 9, describes the loans
receivable and the doubtful accounts. He also brought attention to note 5 that
takes about the transactions that occurred between the City and the IDA for
Riverfront Park Access project. Mr. Goetz noted that note 7 on page 10, the
commitments are listed. He noted a construction contract that was approved at
the end of 2014 where additional funding will be spent in 2015. He also
explained that, as auditors, they are responsible for transactions that occur up
until the statements are approved. Mr. Goetz advised that a subsequent event
took place in 2015 with regards to the Mlock site. He advised that we expended
some funds for an easement and land option agreement that is good for two
years. Steve Bouchey asked if everything looked like it was in line and asked if
there were any areas we could improve. Mr. Goetz said that overall it was good.
We gather a lot of our information from the meeting minutes and from the
website. It is a bit robust, but it contains a lot of information for the public to
see. The Chairman asked if there were any additional questions.
Steve Bouchey made a motion to approve the DRAFT audit
report prepared by SaxBST.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
V. Adjournment for CRC audit presentation
2
The board adjourned the IDA portion of the meeting at 11:01 a.m.
Steve Bouchey made the motion to adjourn the IDA portion of
the meeting.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
Steve Bouchey made a motion to reconvene the IDA portion of
the meeting.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
The board reconvened the IDA meeting at 11:08 a.m.
VI. PARIS report
Bill Dunne spoke about the PARIS report that will be due to the NYS ABO on
March 31st. He noted that we are currently working on the job creation numbers
and will be reviewing the information received back from the projects to ensure
that they are clear and concise. Mr. Dunne added that they will be comparing
their current numbers with their original projections. The Chairman advised that
he would like the board to be aware of the job employment, creation and
retention that is created as a result of the IDA projects. It is very important that
they have the information in the event the public has a question for them about
it. Mr. Bouchey agreed with the Chairman that they should all be as informed as
possible. The Chairman asked that Mr. Dunne do a final review of the PARIS
report before it is submitted.
Steve Bouchey made a motion to accept the PARIS report
pending final reviews and updates by Bill Dunne.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
VII. Financials
Andrew Piotrowski advised the board that there has been a change to the
balance sheet. He advised going forward there will be two separate cash items;
the regular savings account and one listed as restricted cash. The restricted
cash will be the amount that will be going to be paid to the City for PILOT
payments. Mr. Piotrowski also noted that the accounts receivable is negative for
the month of March because of the way the PILOT invoices are set up in the
system. All of the payments are due March 1st, so they were paid out in
February. The due from other governments is the amount due from the City as
part of the CFA grant. Mr. Piotrowski advised that the accounts payable is made
up of legal bills that are due. The operating statement does not show much
activity but did point out the architectural and engineering services are
professional services related to Riverfront Park Access and the easements for the
Mlock property. The Chairman asked if there were any questions regarding the
financials.
Hon. Dean Bodnar asked if administrative fee income meet our expectations in
2014 and if we had as many projects as we thought we would for the year. Mr.
Dunne advised that the project fees were probably a little lower due to
construction times being a little slower than anticipated. He added that a lot of it
will come through for 2015. Mr. Bodnar expressed concern that the project at
3
the Marvin Neitzel building would not move forward. Mr. Dunne advised that he
has been in touch with the owners and they will be having the closing at the end
of the month.
Steve Bouchey made a motion to approve the financials.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
VIII. New Business
Insurance Policy - Mr. Dunne advised that a question came up recently about
insurance requirements for IDA projects. He advised one of the recipients of
benefits had a significant impact on their insurance premiums after adding the
IDA as a named insured on their policy and questioned if we could be listed as
an additionally insured. Mr. Dunne asked if the board would be comfortable in
changing our position to say that we can be listed as an additionally insured
rather than a named insured. Mr. Dunne raised the question if we are listed as a
named insured, is the insuring company responsible for the additional operations
of our entity. The Chairman advised that that change does not impose a greater
risk to the IDA. Mr. Miller advised that historically, projects were set up as a
sales leaseback where we would take title of the property and then lease it back
to the company for the term of the PILOT. The process has changed over the
years to a lease-leaseback, in which the IDA does not take fee title of the
property. We still have an interest in insurance, but for property insurance,
being listed as an additionally insured is enough. Currently, this board does not
have an insurance policy. Mr. Miller spoke about Erie County’s IDA and the
changes they made to their insurance requirements for IDA projects. Mr. Miller
advised we can come up with a policy that can be used as a guideline. Steve
Bouchey clarified that legally we are not bound to require it, but have been doing
it. He added that the IDA is as protected when listed as additionally insured as
when listed as named insured, but will be less of a financial burden for the
recipients. Mr. Miller advised that is correct. He added that City Station was a
little different because of the several different pieces of land that were involved.
Mr. Bouchey noted that this is a good opportunity to clean up policies. Mr.
Dunne advised that it could be written to allow for changes to be made
depending on the nature of the project. The Chairman advised that we can
review it at the next meeting.
Meeting Time change – Bill Dunne advised there was some interest in
changing the meeting time to 10:00 a.m. going forward. The Chairman noted
that the LDC meetings have been getting over earlier and it leaves a long break
between meetings. He has spoken with everyone individually and has come up
with only one conflict.
Steve Bouchey made a motion to approve the change of meeting
time to 10:00 a.m going forward.
Tina Urzan opposed.
5 Approved 1 Opposed 3 Absent, motion carried.
4
New Board member – Bill Dunne wanted to welcome Kathy Cietek as an
official board member.
IX. Adjournment
The IDA meeting was adjourned at 11:26 p.m.
Steve Bouchey made the motion to adjourn the meeting.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
5
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC
MARCH 20, 2015, AT 10:30 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC Project held on Friday August 8
2014, 10:30 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York
12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Kevin O’Bryan, Chairman
Steve Bouchey, Vice Chairman
William Dunne, Authority CEO
Hon. Dean Bodnar, Board Member
Tina Urzan, Board Member
Lou Anthony, Board Member
Kathy Cietek, Board Member
Justin S. Miller, Esq., Authority Transaction Counsel
Tom Rossi, Company Representative
Paul Goetz, Sax BST
Andy Piotrowski, Comptroller’s office
Selena Skiba, Comptroller’s office
Sharon Martin, Assessor
Joe Baniak, Resident
Ken Crowe, Times Union
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:30 a.m.). Kevin O’Bryan opened the hearing and Justin
Miller, Esq. read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by South Lake Avenue
Assoc., LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and
inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (the “Company”), has requested the
Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by
the Authority of a leasehold or other interest in certain parcels of real property located at 46-48
South Lake Avenue and 2 Prout Ave, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more
particularly identified as TMID Nos. 101.43-7-6 and 101.43-4-2) and the existing improvements
located thereon, including 3 building structures comprised of approximately 16,600 square feet
and 20 units of commercial apartments, along with related improvements (the “Existing
Improvements”); (B) the renovation, reconstruction, refurbishing and equipping by the Company
as agent of the Authority of the Existing Improvements, along with the installation and
improvement of common areas, heating systems, plumbing, roofs, windows and other site and
infrastructure improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), all of the foregoing intended for
the Company’s ownership and operation of the Improvements as a commercial housing facility
that will be leased by the Company to residential tenants; (C) the acquisition of and installation
in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain machinery,
fixtures, equipment and other items of tangible personal property (the “Equipment” and,
collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”);
and (D) the lease of the Authority’s interest in the Facility back to the Company.
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York.
The Authority contemplates providing a PILOT Agreement with a term of Eight (8) years
providing (i) a frozen “Base Value” requiring full taxes to be paid on the existing assessed value
of the Land and Existing Improvements, and (ii) an abatement schedule applied to the “Added
Value” associated with the Improvements that provides a 100% exemption from taxation for the
Added Value in PILOT Years one and two, with such exemption being reduced in increments in
PILOT Years three through eight.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $2,200,000.00. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemptions
($2,000,000 Mortgage) = $13,125.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions
(Estimated $1.0M in taxable materials) = $18,400.00
PILOT Schedule** = $120,338.10
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $151,863.10
IV. SEQRA:
The authority contemplates adopting a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”)
with respect to the Project as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”).
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Kevin O’Bryan reminded the board they had an extensive presentation of this project at
their last meeting. Bill Dunne handed out a copy of the PILOT schedule to the board members
and spoke about the background of how the PILOT scheduled is determined.
Hon. Dean Bodnar advised the board that the project is in his council district and he did
go to the site for a visit. Mr. Bodnar noted that the site was sorely in need of the remodeling that
it is getting. Mr. Bodnar toured one of the larger apartments and one that was about 98%
complete. He noted that he was very impressed by what he saw. Mr. O’Bryan explained that he
is familiar with the site and noted that the neighborhood is in need of this project. The
neighborhood has shown no deterioration except for this property. Mr. O’Bryan noted that the
property has been foreclosed upon a couple of times. Mrs. Urzan asked if the board knew the
reasons for the foreclosures. Mr. O’Bryan explained that there have been many different reasons
over the years. He added that a stable, multi-family complex is needed in this area surrounded
by single family homes and with a school nearby. Mrs. Urzan hopes it will be revitalized.
Joe Baniak, a resident at 162 South Lave Avenue, noted that over the years there has been
little attention paid to the sidewalks in the winter and the grass in the summer. Mr. Baniak noted
that people have to walk in the road because there is no clear path in the winter for people to
walk. He asked that something be safeguarded for something built into the agreement to
maintain the property. Mr. Baniak submitted a letter to the board. Tom Rossi, owner of the
property, spoke on behalf of his project. He noted some of his other projects in Troy and in one
in Watervliet. Mr. Rossi explained that he finds distressed properties and tries to bring them
back through the use of historic property credits and energy efficient programs as well as regular
construction. Mr. Rossi advised he has high standards for maintenance on his properties and
there will be maintenance dedicated to the site. Mr. Rossi advised one of the completed projects
on Prout Ave will have a rent at about $1000 per month. Mr. Baniak noted that it sounds like it
will be a good project.
Mr. Bodnar reminded Mr. Baniak that any issues such as snow removal and property
maintainence can be called in to Code Enforcement. Mr. Baniak explained that when people see
a property in their neighborhood being disregarded, others start to neglect their properties. Mr.
Baniak looks forward to the project.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 11:20 a.m.
PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC Project)
A special meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on March 20, 2015 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New
York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Steve Bouchey X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Kathy Cietek X
Lisa Kyer X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Justin S. Miller, Esq.,
Tom Rossi, Paul Goetz, Andy Piotrowski, Selena Skiba, Sharon Martin, Joe Baniak and
Ken Crowe.
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC.
On motion duly made by Tina Urzan and seconded by Steve Bouchey, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Steve Bouchey X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Kathy Cietek X
Lisa Kyer X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 9
Resolution No. 15-3-#1
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A
CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT
OF SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN
CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT; (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT
(“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (the “Company”), has requested
the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition
by the Authority of a leasehold or other interest in certain parcels of real property located at 46-
48 South Lake Avenue and 2 Prout Ave, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more
particularly identified as TMID Nos. 101.43-7-6 and 101.43-4-2) and the existing improvements
located thereon, including 3 building structures comprised of approximately 16,600 square feet
and 20 units of commercial apartments, along with related improvements (the “Existing
Improvements”); (B) the renovation, reconstruction, refurbishing and equipping by the Company
as agent of the Authority of the Existing Improvements, along with the installation and
improvement of common areas, heating systems, plumbing, roofs, windows and other site and
infrastructure improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), all of the foregoing intended for
the Company’s ownership and operation of the Improvements as a commercial housing facility
that will be leased by the Company to residential tenants; (C) the acquisition of and installation
in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain machinery,
fixtures, equipment and other items of tangible personal property (the “Equipment” and,
collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”);
and (D) the lease of the Authority’s interest in the Facility back to the Company; and
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted February 13, 2015 (the “Initial Project Resolution”),
the Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the
scheduling, notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public
Hearing”), and (iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the
Authority with respect to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein);
and
Page 2 of 9
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled,
noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:30 a.m. on March 20, 2015, whereat all
interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or
in writing, on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be
afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public
Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing and Contemplated
Deviation being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the authorization of the Project, the Authority desires to
review the Project as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and
regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”), and has been presented with an
Environmental Assessment Form (“EAF”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated a lease agreement (the “Lease
Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related payment-
in-lieu-of-tax agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set forth
within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold interest in
the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the Company
agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing Improvements,
Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the term of the
Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of Financial
Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating to one
or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption for
purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a partial
real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to authorize the undertaking of the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
Page 3 of 9
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
(E) The Authority has reviewed the EAF and determined the Project involves an
“Unlisted Action” as said term is defined under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based
upon the review by the Authority of the EAF and related documents delivered by the Company
to the Authority and other representations made by the Company to the Authority in connection
with the Project, the Authority hereby finds that (i) the Project will result in no major impacts
and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment; (ii) the
Project will not have a “significant effect on the environment” as such quoted terms are defined
in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact statement” as such quoted term is defined in
SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This determination constitutes a negative declaration
in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship and involvement with the Project for purposes of
SEQRA.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a
sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in
furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax
exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance
of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the
Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a
related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other
evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority
hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest
in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording
documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel
to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution
and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the
construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true
and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and
acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts,
orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority
Page 4 of 9
to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors
of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in
general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the
same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $230,000.00, which result in New York State and local
sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$18,400.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A)
Page 5 of 9
the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the Land, Existing
Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Authority, (B) the
Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land,
Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the
Company, (C) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make
certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions
(along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement), and (C) related documents, including, but
not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided
the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by
the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the
Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project.
Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief
Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and
to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents,
security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by
these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a
maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance
acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional
costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby
authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same,
all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman
and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the
execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all
events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project.
Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 6 of 9
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Page 8 of 9
EXHIBIT B
SEQRA MATERIALS
Page 9 of 9
Agenda
Chairman
Troy
Kevin O’Bryan
Industrial Development
Authority
Vice-Chair
Steve Bouchey
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
Board Members March 20, 2015
10:30 a.m.
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Planning Department Conference
Mr. Paul Carroll
Room
Hon. Robert Doherty
City Hall
Louis Anthony
Lisa Kyer
Tina Urzan AGENDA
I. Public Hearing ‐ South Lake Avenue Associates, LLC (Justin)
II. Approval of Minutes from the February 13, 2015 board meeting.
III. Authorizing Resolution ‐ South Lake Avenue Associates, LLC (Justin)
IV. Audit Presentation by SaxBST
V. Board vote on DRAFT audit prepared by SaxBST
VI. Financials and review of PARIS report (Joe)
VII. New Business
VIII. Adjournment
City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180
Phone: 518.279.7166
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC
MARCH 20, 2015, AT 10:30 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC Project held on Friday August 8
2014, 10:30 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York
12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
William Dunne, Authority CEO
Justin S. Miller, Esq., Authority Transaction Counsel
[list other TIDA representatives in attendance]
[________________, Company Representative]
Members of the General Public
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:30 a.m.). __________________opened the hearing and
_________________ read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by South Lake Avenue
Assoc., LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and
inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (the “Company”), has requested the
Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by
the Authority of a leasehold or other interest in certain parcels of real property located at 46-48
South Lake Avenue and 2 Prout Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more
particularly identified as TMID Nos. 101.43-7-6 and 101.43-4-2) and the existing improvements
located thereon, including 3 building structures comprised of approximately 16,600 square feet
and 20 units of commercial apartments, along with related improvements (the “Existing
Improvements”); (B) the renovation, reconstruction, refurbishing and equipping by the Company
as agent of the Authority of the Existing Improvements, along with the installation and
improvement of common areas, heating systems, plumbing, roofs, windows and other site and
infrastructure improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), all of the foregoing intended for
the Company’s ownership and operation of the Improvements as a commercial housing facility
that will be leased by the Company to residential tenants; (C) the acquisition of and installation
in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain machinery,
fixtures, equipment and other items of tangible personal property (the “Equipment” and,
collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”);
and (D) the lease of the Authority’s interest in the Facility back to the Company.
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York.
The Authority contemplates providing a PILOT Agreement with a term of Eight (8) years
providing (i) a frozen “Base Value” requiring full taxes to be paid on the existing assessed value
of the Land and Existing Improvements, and (ii) an abatement schedule applied to the “Added
Value” associated with the Improvements that provides a 100% exemption from taxation for the
Added Value in PILOT Years one and two, with such exemption being reduced in increments in
PILOT Years three through eight.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $2,200,000.00. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemptions
($2,000,000 Mortgage) = $13,125.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions
(Estimated $1.0M in taxable materials) = $18,400.00
PILOT Schedule** = $120,338.10
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $151,863.10
IV. SEQRA:
The authority contemplates adopting a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”)
with respect to the Project as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”).
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at ________ a.m.
City of Troy
Industrial Development Authority
February 13, 2015
10:35 AM
Meeting Minutes
Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Bill Dunne, Steve Bouchey, Paul Carroll, Tina Urzan, Hon. Dean
Bodnar, Lisa Kyer and Hon. Robert Doherty
Absent: Lou Anthony
Also in attendance: Justin Miller, Tim O’Bryne, Jeff Buell, Kathy Cietek, Tom Rossi,
Selena Skiba, Ken Crowe, and Denee Zeigler
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:35 a.m.
I. Public Hearing ‐ The Ironworks, HVCC student Housing
(please see attached Public Hearing Agenda for minutes)
II. Minutes from the January 13, 2015 board meeting
The board reviewed the minutes from the January 13, 2015 board meeting.
Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to approve the minutes for the
January 13, 2015 board meeting.
Lisa Kyer seconded the motion, motion carried.
III. The Ironworks Authorizing Resolution
Bill Dunne advised the authorizing resolution in from of them is for The
Ironworks project that was discussed at the beginning of the meeting. Mr. Miller
advised the resolution would authorize the lease/leaseback and PILOT
agreement. Mr. Miller asked about the timing of the closing. Mr. Buell advised
in about two to three months. The Chairman asked if there were any other
questions. (See attached Authorizing Resolution 02/15 #1)
Paull Carroll made a motion to approve the Authorizing
Resolution for The Ironworks.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
IV. South Lake Avenue Associates
Mr. Dunne introduced Tom Rossi to the board members. He explained that Mr.
Rossi is also one of the principals of Redburn Development who have recently
completed the River Street Lofts project on River Street and one of the principles
of Massive Mesh which is working to provide wireless services to Downtown
Troy.
Mr. Rossi talked to the board about his current project on the corner of South
Lake Avenue and Prout Avenue. He advised that the 20 unit property is the
typical neglected foreclosure property and they had been looking at it for about a
1
year before purchasing the property in November. Mr. Rossi noted that there
are a lot of current tenant and maintenance issues but the area is really nice and
the complex has a lot of potential. Mr. Rossi noted that there is a strong
demand in that area for apartments for the everyday person. He advised that he
has been working with the City Assessor to reduce the assessment to align with
the appraisal and purchase price. Mr. Rossi advised they are looking for
assistance from the IDA to assist in freezing the assessment over the next 10
years so they can move forward with the financing. Mr. Rossi spoke about the
work that has been done to date on the two properties. He added that the
apartments on Prout are a little higher end at $1000 a month and the
apartments on South Lake will be about $800-$1000 a month.
Hon. Dean Bodnar asked about the term of the PILOT. Mr. Dunne advised it is
an eight year PILOT. Mr. Rossi advised that the mortgage recording tax and
sales tax will also be a great assistance to the project. Mr. Bodnar asked if there
would be an onsite manager for the properties. Mr. Rossi advised that they have
four employees through their construction management property that will not be
on site, but available as needed and on demand. Mr. Bodnar noted that part of
the IDA’s mission is to promote economic development and create jobs. Mr.
Rossi advised that we may have to add on additional staff and we are based in
Troy. Mr. Dean spoke about the background and history of the apartment
complex. Mr. Rossi spoke about the plan to keep the complex occupied as they
work through the apartments. He advised that they will be using their own
construction crew and estimated about $15,000-$20,000 to be going into each
apartment. Mr. Bodnar asked about the type of apartments. Mr. Rossi advised
most are two bedrooms and there are a couple one and three bedrooms. He
also added that landscaping will be done to compliment the surrounding
neighborhood. Mr. Bodnar advised that after the eight years the taxes will be up
to the full amount.
Mrs. Urzan also noted the concern about not creating employment. The
Chairman spoke about the history of the apartment complex and noted its ups
and downs over the years. Mr. Rossi advised that this will be a long term project
that will help to turn the neighborhood around and they are going to work on
rebranding the property. The Chairman agreed. Mr. Bouchey asked about the
details on working around the current tenants. Mr. Rossi advised that 2 Prout is
almost done and then they will continue to work in the South Lake Apartments
little by little. He advised it will take two tenant cycles before the apartments are
completed and new tenants in place. Lisa Kyer asked if there would be an
impact on the district. Mr. Rossi advised it shouldn’t change much. He explained
that about four or five units currently have kids. After the remodeling, the larger
apartments will be able to accommodate kids, but probably not the two
bedrooms. The Chairman advised that they will be voting on the initial project
resolution at this time. (See attached Initial Resolution 02/15 #2)
Steve Bouchey made a motion to approve the initial project
resolution for the South Lake Avenue Associates.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
V. Board Member Evaluations and Annual Disclosures
2
Bill Dunne reminded the board members to complete their evaluation and annual
disclosures and advised copies are available if needed.
VI. Board member vacancy
Mr. Dunne introduced Kathy Cietek to the board members. Mr. Dunne advised
that she will be filling the vacancy for the Troy School board and taking the place
of Mary O’Neil. The City Council will vote on her appointment at the next City
Council meeting. Mr. Dunne advised that there will be a board member training
she will be required to complete. The board members all introduced themselves.
VII. Financials
Selena Skiba went through the current financials with the board. Mr. Skiba
advised that the due from other governments section relates to the
reimbursement grant we will be getting from the City for the Riverfront Park
Access project. Unearned revenue relates to a prepayment for Beman Property
Development. Mr. Dunne wanted to note the check for the easements for the
Ingalls Avenue Development site. Mrs. Skiba advised that is noted on the last
line.
The Chairman asked about the architectural/engineering expense. Mr. Dunne
advised that item is for the payment to Architecture+ for design services and
construction costs for the deck and stairs for the Riverfront Park Access project.
He advised there are some railings and lights that will need to be installed. Mr.
Dunne advised that they last step of the project will be done when the weather
is warmer and it will be a treatment for the concrete to keep it from deteriorating
over time.
Mrs. Skiba wanted to point out the payments for IBT on the last page. Mr. Miller
advised we have reached out to them to catch up their payments and will take
more action in the future if needed.
Steve Bouchey made a motion to approve the financials.
Lisa Kyer seconded the motion, motion carried.
VIII. Executive Sessions
Steve Bouchey made a motion to enter into executive session to
discuss staff and personnel issues.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
Steve Bouchey made a motion to adjourn executive session.
Hon. Bob Doherty seconded the motion, motion carried.
The board returned from executive session with no action taken.
IX. Adjournment
The IDA meeting was adjourned at 11:45 p.m.
Hon. Dean Bodnar made the motion to adjourn the meeting.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
3
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IRONWORKS HOUSING LLC
February 13, 2015 AT 10:30 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the Ironworks Housing LLC Project held on Friday February 13, 2015 at
10:30 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Kevin O’Bryan, Authority Chairman
William Dunne, Authority CEO
Steve Bouchey, Board Member
Paul Carroll, Board Member
Tina Urzan, Board Member
Hon. Dean Bodnar, Board Member
Lisa Kyer, Board Member
Hon. Robert Doherty, Board Member
Justin S. Miller, Esq., Authority Transaction Counsel
Jeff Buell, Company Representative
Tim O’Byrne, Company Representative
Kathy Cietek, General Public
Tom Rossi, General Public
Selena Skiba, Dep. Comptroller for Authority
Ken Crowe, Times Union
Denee Zeigler, Acting Secretary
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:30 a.m.). Kevin O’Bryan opened the hearing and Justin
Miller read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by Ironworks Housing LLC
to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the
general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
OMNI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be
formed including IRONWORKS HOUSING LLC (collectively, the “Company”), has
requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the
acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately 13 acres of real property
located at 45 Vandenburgh Avenue at the corner of Morrison Avenue and Vandenburgh Avenue,
Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as a portion of TMID No.
112.69-1-10) and the existing site and infrastructure improvements located thereon being
comprised of five (5) buildings containing approximately 91,793 square feet of space along with
existing site improvements (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the demolition of portions of the
Existing Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction, operation and
maintenance upon the Land and around the Existing Improvements of a four (4) story residential
facility including ninety-eight (98) units of rental residential housing, approximately 8,000
square feet of common area space, along with related exterior access and egress improvements,
parking, curbage, site work and landscaping improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”),
such Improvements to be known as “The Ironworks”, and (iii) the acquisition and installation by
the Company in and around the Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”).
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. The Authority contemplates
providing a PILOT Agreement with a term of Twenty (20) years providing for a fixed payment
schedule.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $20,779,000. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $200,000.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $800,000.00
Estimated PILOT Savings = $6,276,394.50
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $7,276,394.50
PILOT Payments $1,498,763.57
(All new revenue for exempt property)
IV. SEQRA:
Hudson Valley Community College (the “HVCC”), as lead agency pursuant to the State
Environmental Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively,
“SEQRA”), previously reviewed the Project and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative
Declaration”) with respect to the Project.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Company Representative Jeff Buell spoke briefly about the project and advised that all
approvals have been received and the project has grown slightly to 130,000 square feet. Mr.
Buell advised that asbestos abatement will begin soon and the target open date will be August
15, 2016. Mr. Buell explained that they have held six public meetings over the last several
months. The Chairman asked how the community meetings went and if there were any concerns
raised. Mr. Buell advised that the neighborhood was excited to have the building occupied and
they were mostly concerned with the traffic. Hon. Bob Doherty asked about the PILOT
schedule. Mr. Dunne distributed one to the board members for review. Justin Miller noted that
the property has been historically exempt and this project will generate taxes for the first time.
Mr. Buell also emphasized that point and noted that this PILOT is slightly higher than some of
the other student housing projects. Hon. Dean Bodnar asked about the term of the PILOT. Mr.
Buell advised it will be a 20 year PILOT. Lisa Kyer asked about the process of reimbursing the
school districts. Mr. Miller explained the process of the IDA receiving the full payment and then
reimbursing the school districts. Ms. Kyer asked if it was a fixed amount. Mr. Miller advised
yes, with some step ups. Mr. Dunne advised that this PILOT is modeled after the City Station
South project. The PILOT will be based on the number of units rather than a dollar value with a
bump every five years. Mr. Buell advised it will increase every year with a bump every five
years. The Chairman noted that this will be the first time that there will be money coming in for
this property. Steve Bouchey asked about the decision to make the PILOT 20 years. Mr. Dunne
advised it is in line with their financing. The Chairman asked how this student housing will be
different than the others surrounding the school. Mr. Buell advised that that this building will be
different than the others because it will have five, full time, building staff on site at all times,
overnight security, one cost per month that will include all necessities and there will also be
parking and common space. Mr. Buell advised that community colleges are not allowed to have
housing so they rely on projects like this to provide the service. Bob Doherty wanted to note that
this project is important especially because it will be added to the tax rolls for the first time. The
Chairman asked if there were any other questions. No additional questions or comments.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 11:10 a.m.
PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(Ironworks Housing LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on February 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy,
New York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Steve Bouchey X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Lisa Kyer X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Justin Miller, Tim O’Bryne, Jeff Buell,
Kathy Cietek, Tom Rossi, Selena Skiba, Ken Crowe, and Denee Zeigler
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of Ironworks Housing LLC.
On motion duly made by Paul Carroll and seconded by Hon. Dean Bodnar, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Steve Bouchey X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Lisa Kyer X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 9
Resolution No. 02/15 #1
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A
CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT
OF OMNI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LLC ON BEHALF OF IRONWORKS
HOUSING LLC OR AN ENTITY TO BE FORMED (THE “COMPANY”) IN
CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT; (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT
(“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, OMNI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of
an entity to be formed including IRONWORKS HOUSING LLC (collectively, the
“Company”) IRONWORKS HOUSING LLC (the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s
assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority
of a leasehold interest in approximately 13 acres of real property located at 45 Vandenburgh
Avenue at the corner of Morrison Avenue and Vandenburgh Avenue, Troy, New York 12180
(the “Land”, being more particularly identified as a portion of TMID No. 112.69-1-10) and the
existing site and infrastructure improvements located thereon being comprised of five (5)
buildings containing approximately 91,793 square feet of space along with existing site
improvements (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the demolition of portions of the Existing
Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction, operation and maintenance
upon the Land and around the Existing Improvements of a four (4) story residential facility
including ninety-eight (98) units of rental residential housing, approximately 8,000 square feet of
common area space, along with related exterior access and egress improvements, parking,
curbage, site work and landscaping improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), such
Improvements to be known as “The Ironworks”, and (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”); and
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted June 13, 2014 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the
Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling,
notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and
Page 2 of 9
(iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect
to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled,
noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:30 a.m. on February 9, 2015, whereat all
interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or
in writing on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be
afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public
Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing and Contemplated
Deviation being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, Hudson Valley Community
College (“HVCC”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and
regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”), previously reviewed the Project
and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”) with respect to the Project, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated a lease agreement (the “Lease
Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related payment-
in-lieu-of-tax agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set forth
within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold interest in
the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the Company
agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing Improvements,
Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the term of the
Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of Financial
Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating to one
or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption for
purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a partial
real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
Page 3 of 9
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
(E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by HVCC and
determined the Project involves a Type I as said term is defined under SEQRA. The review is
uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the Negative Declaration, related
Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related documents delivered by the Company
to the Authority and other representations made by the Company to the Authority in connection
with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the SEQRA determination made by HVCC and the
Authority further finds that (i) the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one
which may not cause significant damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a
“significant effect on the environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no
“environmental impact statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared
for this action. This determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the
Authority’s sponsorship and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a
sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in
furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax
exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance
of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the
Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a
related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other
evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority
hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest
in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording
documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel
to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution
and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the
construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true
and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and
acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts,
Page 4 of 9
orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority
to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors
of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in
general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the
same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $10,000,000.00, which result in New York State and
local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$800,000.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Page 5 of 9
Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A)
the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the Land, Existing
Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Authority, (B) the
Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land,
Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the
Company, (C) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make
certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions
(along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement, or in the discretion of the Executive Director,
a sufficient guaranty of performance under the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement),
and (C) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s)
of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement
include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project.
Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief
Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and
to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents,
security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by
these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a
maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance
acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional
costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby
authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same,
all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman
and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the
execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all
events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project.
Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 6 of 9
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Page 8 of 9
EXHIBIT B
SEQRA MATERIALS
Page 9 of 9
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on February 13, 2015, at 10:30 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York
12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Steve Bouchey X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Lisa Kyer X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Justin Miller, Tim O’Bryne, Jeff Buell,
Kathy Cietek, Tom Rossi, Selena Skiba, Ken Crowe, and Denee Zeigler
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC.
On motion duly made by Steve Bouchey and seconded by Hon. Dean Bodnar, the
following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development
Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Steve Bouchey X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Lisa Kyer X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 5
Resolution No. 02/15 #2
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF SOUTH
LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION
WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii)
AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A
PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii)
DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (the “Company”), has requested
the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition
by the Authority of a leasehold or other interest in certain parcels of real property located at 46-
48 South Lake Avenue and 2 Prout Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more
particularly identified as TMID Nos. 101.43-7-6 and 101.43-4-2) and the existing improvements
located thereon, including 3 building structures comprised of approximately 16,600 square feet
and 20 units of commercial apartments, along with related improvements (the “Existing
Improvements”); (B) the renovation, reconstruction, refurbishing and equipping by the Company
as agent of the Authority of the Existing Improvements, along with the installation and
improvement of common areas, heating systems, plumbing, roofs, windows and other site and
infrastructure improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), all of the foregoing intended for
the Company’s ownership and operation of the Improvements as a commercial housing facility
that will be leased by the Company to residential tenants; (C) the acquisition of and installation
in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain machinery,
fixtures, equipment and other items of tangible personal property (the “Equipment” and,
collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”);
and (D) the lease of the Authority’s interest in the Facility back to the Company; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
Page 2 of 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of (A) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Land
and Existing Improvements to the Authority, (B) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to
which the Authority leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (C) a PILOT
Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real
property taxes, and (D) related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the
Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or
related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by
Page 3 of 5
the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT
Agreement are consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures
for deviation have been complied with.
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 4 of 5
PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC Project)
A special meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on March 20, 2015 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New
York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Hon. Robert Doherty
Steve Bouchey
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Kathy Cietek
Lisa Kyer
Tina Urzan
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT:
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of South Lake Avenue Assoc., LLC.
On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Hon. Robert Doherty
Steve Bouchey
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Kathy Cietek
Lisa Kyer
Tina Urzan
Page 1 of 9
Resolution No. 15-3-____
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A
CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT
OF SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN
CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT; (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT
(“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, SOUTH LAKE AVENUE ASSOC., LLC (the “Company”), has requested
the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition
by the Authority of a leasehold or other interest in certain parcels of real property located at 46-
48 South Lake Avenue and 2 Prout Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more
particularly identified as TMID Nos. 101.43-7-6 and 101.43-4-2) and the existing improvements
located thereon, including 3 building structures comprised of approximately 16,600 square feet
and 20 units of commercial apartments, along with related improvements (the “Existing
Improvements”); (B) the renovation, reconstruction, refurbishing and equipping by the Company
as agent of the Authority of the Existing Improvements, along with the installation and
improvement of common areas, heating systems, plumbing, roofs, windows and other site and
infrastructure improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), all of the foregoing intended for
the Company’s ownership and operation of the Improvements as a commercial housing facility
that will be leased by the Company to residential tenants; (C) the acquisition of and installation
in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain machinery,
fixtures, equipment and other items of tangible personal property (the “Equipment” and,
collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”);
and (D) the lease of the Authority’s interest in the Facility back to the Company; and
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted February 13, 2015 (the “Initial Project Resolution”),
the Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the
scheduling, notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public
Hearing”), and (iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the
Authority with respect to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein);
and
Page 2 of 9
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled,
noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:30 a.m. on March 20, 2015, whereat all
interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or
in writing, on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be
afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public
Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing and Contemplated
Deviation being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the authorization of the Project, the Authority desires to
review the Project as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and
regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”), and has been presented with an
Environmental Assessment Form (“EAF”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated a lease agreement (the “Lease
Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related payment-
in-lieu-of-tax agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set forth
within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold interest in
the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the Company
agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing Improvements,
Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the term of the
Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of Financial
Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating to one
or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption for
purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a partial
real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to authorize the undertaking of the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
Page 3 of 9
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
(E) The Authority has reviewed the EAF and determined the Project involves an
“Unlisted Action” as said term is defined under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based
upon the review by the Authority of the EAF and related documents delivered by the Company
to the Authority and other representations made by the Company to the Authority in connection
with the Project, the Authority hereby finds that (i) the Project will result in no major impacts
and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment; (ii) the
Project will not have a “significant effect on the environment” as such quoted terms are defined
in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact statement” as such quoted term is defined in
SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This determination constitutes a negative declaration
in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship and involvement with the Project for purposes of
SEQRA.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a
sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in
furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax
exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance
of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the
Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a
related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other
evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority
hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest
in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording
documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel
to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution
and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the
construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true
and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and
acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts,
orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority
to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors
of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in
Page 4 of 9
general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the
same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $230,000.00, which result in New York State and local
sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$18,400.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A)
the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the Land, Existing
Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Authority, (B) the
Page 5 of 9
Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land,
Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the
Company, (C) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make
certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions
(along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement), and (C) related documents, including, but
not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided
the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by
the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the
Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project.
Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief
Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and
to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents,
security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by
these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a
maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance
acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional
costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby
authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same,
all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman
and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the
execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all
events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project.
Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 6 of 9
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy
Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the
foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the
Resolution contained therein, held on March 20, 2015, with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set
forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters
therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this ____ day of __________, 2015.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Page 7 of 9
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Page 8 of 9
EXHIBIT B
SEQRA MATERIALS
Page 9 of 9
Get email alerts for Troy
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.