Muyni
← Back to Troy

Troy Industrial Development Authority

Regular Meeting

Troy, NY · December 16, 2016

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

Troy Industrial Development Authority December 16, 2016 10:00 AM Meeting Minutes Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Steve Strichman, Hon. Dean Bodnar, Hon. Robert Doherty, Tina Urzan, Susan Farrell and Lou Anthony Absent: Paul Carroll and Adam Hotaling Also in attendance: Robert Ryan, Cheryl Kennedy, Jim Lozano, Mary Ellen Flores, Deanne DalPos, Sharon Martin, Lucas Nathan, Andy Patel, Kalpen Patel, Minesh Patel, Tom Sawyer and Denee Zeigler. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. I. Minutes The board reviewed the minutes from the November 18, 2016 board meeting. Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the November 18, 2016 meeting minutes. Lou Anthony seconded the motion, motion carried. II. Mlock Parcel Mr. Strichman advised the board that they did extend the option to purchase the lot and in the meantime, the City of Troy has received a grant in the amount of $450,000 to help purchase the site. He added that they will be working with the new owner of 701 River Street to come up with a plan for the site. The board looked forward to discussing it at further board meetings. III. Troy Lodging Associates, LLC – Initial Project Resolution Mr. Strichman introduced the people from Visions Hotel to discuss the project. He advised that the project has received planning commission approvals for a hotel to be built at the corner of Fifth Avenue and Congress Street. Mr. Patel explained that this project is a Hilton brand called Tru. This particular brand is geared towards millennials; less time is spent in the rooms and more in the lobby. The lobby is much larger than other hotels and contains activities for the guests to do and interact with each other. He advised that there will be 98 rooms. Mr. Patel advised there are some challenges that we faced with the small site; it has caused the cost of the project to increase by about $2 Million. He added that after going through the planning commission it was requested that they have three stair towers, update the facade and add underground parking. He advised they would like to start in May. Mr. Patel expects about 28,000 guests each year. He added that they recently finished a hotel project in East Greenbush. This project will take between 14-18 months to complete due to the underground parking and other site work. Ms. Urzan asked how many stories 1 the building will be. Mr. Patel advised five stories; including the underground parking. Ms. Urzan asked how many parking spots there will be. Mr. Patel advised that they will have a little fewer than 93 parking spots, but we have worked out with the City that there is additional parking in the surrounding areas. Ms. Urzan asked if there is a restaurant no site. Mr. Patel advised no and added that all of the activities will be in the lobby. He explained that the model is designed to have people congregate in the lobby and mingle instead of in small groups in the rooms. Mr. Doherty asked about their background and other projects they have completed. Mr. Patel advised that he started in the hotel business about 25 years ago. They have completed most of their projects in upstate New York; the Utica/Buffalo/Rochester area. Mr. Patel advised that the Visions company tries to give back to the communities they build in. He talked about some of the community events that they hold and services they extend to the surrounding residents; holiday events and assistance to fire victims. The board asked who the property was purchased from. Mr. Patel advised they bought the land from Mr. Ucellini. He added that this is our first downtown hotel. Ms. Urzan asked how many employees. Mr. Patel advised that this is their first Tru project and he is planning on 10-15 local employees. Ms. Urzan asked about the landscaping. Mr. Patel advised that the site is very tight so there will be minimal landscaping, but he will do as much as they can to soften the look of the site. Ms. Urzan asked about the underground parking. Mr. Patel advised that they will enter in from Sixth Ave and the main hotel entrance will be on Seventh Ave. He added that they will have a circular drop off at the entrance and a deck/patio area outside on the first floor. The board agreed that this is an important corner that is considered a gateway to the downtown and City Station across the street. The chairman advised that this project already has planning approval, but we will get another look at this project. Mr. Bodnar asked about the exterior of the building. Mr. Patel advised this was something they discussed during the planning process and it was decided that the stucco look they usually have on the outside is not going to be used. He added that the hotel will have a more urban, modern look to it. (See attached Resolution 12/16 #1) Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to approve the Initial Project Resolution for Troy Lodging Associates, LLC project. Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried. IV. Executive Director Report Mr. Strichman advised that the project at 515 River Street was tabled at the last planning meeting in order to discuss the bicycle trail that is set to go behind the property. Mr. Strichman advised there is an easement in place and they will be working with the South Troy trial group. He added that the applicant is in need of all of the parking spots; it will be something they need to work out. Mr. Strichman advised that 444 River Street was pulled from this agenda and will be discussed at the next meeting. He added that we don’t expect any changes to the deal. Mr. Strichman advised that there are three projects in the pipeline; a downtown residential project, office space and the Canon building. V. Financials 2 Ms. Flores advised that there is $915,000 in assets versus $38,000 in liabilities leaving $877,000 in equity. There are no other items of significance on the balance sheet. Ms. Flores advised that the profit and loss report shows a $2,500 in loss for the month and $566,000 profit for the year. Susan Farrell made a motion to accept the financials as presented. Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried. VI. Old Business No old business to discuss. VII. New Business Mr. Strichman reminded the board members to complete the end of the year board member evaluations. The chairman advised that the Mayor has decided on a replacement for vice chairman, Mr. Bouchey. He added that if anyone was interested in the position, please come forward. If not, the replacement person will be a good fit for the position. The board had a general discussion about the Troy school board representative. Mr. Strichman advised that we will have our annual meeting next month. Mr. Doherty wanted to note the importance of Steve’s position in the city and on the boards. Mr. Strichman advised that he really enjoys working here and noted that the politics were a little different than he expected. He added that it is challenging due to resource issues, but he has starting to understand the strengths of his staff and would like to spend some additional time working on the LDC and IDA projects. Mr. Strichman noted that there is a lot of great opportunity here. He is looking forward to moving some of the big projects forward. Mr. Bodnar spoke about the positive, notable changes that have occurred over the last six years downtown. The chairman agreed and hoped that there will be more projects to come and developers that are willing to come to Troy. Mr. Doherty noted a few mistakes along the way, but moving forward we will do better. The board agreed that we need to keep the statements positive in order to move these important projects forward and keep them coming in. Mr. Doherty agreed and advised some pushback is okay, but the comments must be constructive. VIII. Adjournment With no other items to discuss, the IDA portion of the meeting was adjourned at 10:42 a.m. Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting. Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried. 3 INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION (Troy Lodging Associates LLC Project) A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was convened on December 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman and, upon roll being called, the following members of the Authority were: MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT Kevin O’Bryan X Hon. Dean Bodnar X Hon. Robert Doherty X Louis Anthony X Paul Carroll X Adam Hotaling X Susan Farrell X Tina Urzan X The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Robert Ryan, Cheryl Kennedy, Jim Lozano, Mary Ellen Flores, Deanne DalPos, Sharon Martin, Lucas Nathan, Andy Patel, Kalpen Patel, Minesh Patel, Tom Sawyer and Denee Zeigler. After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a proposed project for the benefit of Troy Lodging Associates LLC. On motion duly made by Hon. Bob Doherty and seconded by Tina Urzan, the following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority: Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent Kevin O’Bryan X Hon. Dean Bodnar X Hon. Robert Doherty X Louis Anthony X Paul Carroll X Adam Hotaling X Susan Farrell X Tina Urzan X Page 1 of 5 Resolution No. 12/16 #1 RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF TROY LODGING ASSOCIATES LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii) AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii) DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, TROY LODGING ASSOCIATES LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .75 acres of real property located at 1610 Sixth Avenue, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.62-1-1) and the existing parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a five story hotel facility comprised of approximately 45,000 square feet and 98 hotel rooms, along with a first floor parking garage, exterior access and egress improvements, curbage, utility and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is contemplating with respect to the Project; and WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below. Page 2 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines that: (A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all powers granted to it under the Act; and (B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the Act; and (C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and (D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated. Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E) related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and Page 3 of 5 indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation have been complied with. Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees, charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms, covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority. Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately. Page 4 of 5

Agenda

Chairman Troy Kevin O’Bryan Industrial Development Authority Vice-Chair vacant BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Executive Director December 16, 2016 10:00 a.m. Steven Strichman Planning Department Conference Board Members Room Hon. Dean Bodnar Mr. Paul Carroll Hon. Robert Doherty AGENDA Louis Anthony Tina Urzan Adam Hotaling Susan Farrell I. Approval of Minutes from the November 18, 2016 board meeting. II. Mlock parcel discussion III. Troy Lodging Associates, LLC – Initial Project Resolution IV. Executive Director’s Report V. Financials VI. Old Business VII. New Business VIII. Adjournment City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180 Phone: 518.279.7166 Troy Industrial Development Authority November 18, 2016 10:00 AM Meeting Minutes Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Steve Strichman, Paul Carroll, Hon. Dean Bodnar, Tina Urzan and Lou Anthony Absent: Susan Farrell, Hon. Robert Doherty and Adam Hotaling Also in attendance: Justin Miller, Cheryl Kennedy, Jim Lozano, Mary Ellen Flores, Rafael Lee, Paul Rapp, Larry Novak, Mike Robarge, Anasha Cummings and Denee Zeigler. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. I. 200 Broadway, LLC – Public Hearing was opened at 10 a.m. (See attached Public Hearing Agenda) II. 444 River Lofts, LLC – Public Hearing was opened at 10 a.m. (See attached Public Hearing Agenda) III. Minutes The board reviewed the minutes from the October 14, 2016 board meeting. Hon. Dean Bodnar made a motion to approve the October 14, 2016 meeting minutes. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. IV. 200 Broadway, Hendrick Hudson Building, LLC – Project Authorizing Resolution Mr. Miller noted that this is the final step in the approval process and they are planning on closing in December. The chairman asked the board if they have any further questions on the project and noted that this project has been presented to the board on more than one occasion. (See attached Resolution 11/16 #1) Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the Project Authorizing Resolution for Hendrick Hudson Building, LLC project. Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried. V. Mlock Parcel Mr. Miller spoke about the easement that we received for a portion of the Mlock parcel. He added that there was a two year option to purchase the rest of the parcel as part of a redevelopment effort of that area. Mr. Miller advised that the option runs through January 16, 2016 and would have required that notice be sent out 60 days before. Mr. Miller advised that they have reached out to the 1 parcel owners and asked for a 90 day extension to decide what they want to do going forward. Mr. Bodnar asked about the easement that we currently have. Mr. Miller advised that the easement is perpetual; if we purchase the parcel then it would be added into the ownership. He added that the owners of 701 River Street may want to contribute to the acquisition in order to integrate into their project. The chairman advised no action is required at this time, but we will discuss going forward. VI. Executive Director Report The chairman advised that this will be an ongoing agenda item to help keep the board up to date on current, past and future projects. VII. Financials Ms. Flores advised that there is $930,000 in assets versus $37,000 in liabilities leaving $873,000 in equity. There are no other items of significance on the balance sheet. Ms. Flores advised that the profit and loss report shows a $222,000 in profit from administration fees received from HV Housing and 433 River Street. Lou Anthony made a motion to accept the financials as presented. Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried. VIII. Adjournment With no other items to discuss, the IDA portion of the meeting was adjourned at 10:21 a.m. Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting. Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried. 2 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Hendrick Hudson Building LLC NOVEMBER 18, 2016 AT 10:00 A.M. CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180 Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) regarding the 25 Morrison Avenue Assoc., LLC Project held on Friday November 18, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. I. ATTENDANCE Kevin O’Bryan, Chairman Hon. Dean Bodnar, Board Member Lou Anthony, Board Member Tina Urzan, Board Member Paul Carroll, Board Member Larry Novak, Bonacio Cheryl Kennedy, City of Troy Economic Development Coordinator James Lozano, CFO for Hire Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire Rafael Lee, General Public Paul Rapp, General Public Anasha Cummings, General Public Mike Robarge, The Troy Record II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Kevin O’Bryan opened the hearing and Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record: This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by Hendrick Hudson Building LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing. III. PROJECT SUMMARY HENDRICK HUDSON BUILDING LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .32 acres of real property located at 200 Broadway, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.53-3-1.1) and the existing building parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon consisting principally of a seven story and approximately 80,000 square foot commercial office building (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a mixed-use commercial and residential facility, including the conversion of third and fourth floor levels to accommodate up to seventeen (17) residential apartment units, the upgrade and improvement of commercials spaces, exterior access and egress improvements, elevator, roof, window, utility and HVAC improvements, and parking, curbage, and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company. It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. The Authority contemplates providing a PILOT Agreement with a term of Fifteen (15) years. IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of approximately $5,508,251. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company: Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 55,125.00 Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 133,158.40 Estimated PILOT Savings = $ 301,881.71 Total estimated Financial Assistance = $ 490,165.11 IV. SEQRA: For purposes of the Project, the Authority will serve as lead agency for purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA. VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments from the public. Board member Tina Urzan noted that the building is described as historic. She asked if the building is designated as a historic building and if so, which list was it on. She added that being designated can cause the construction prices to change. The board was not certain if it was listed on the registry or considered historic for other reasons. VII. ADJOURNMENT As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:05 a.m. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 444 RIVER LOFTS, LLC PROJECT NOVEMBER 18, 2016 AT 10:00 A.M. CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180 Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) regarding the Vecino Group New York, LLC Project held on Friday October 9, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. I. ATTENDANCE Kevin O’Bryan, Chairman Hon. Dean Bodnar, Board Member Lou Anthony, Board Member Tina Urzan, Board Member Paul Carroll, Board Member Larry Novak, Bonacio Cheryl Kennedy, City of Troy Economic Development Coordinator James Lozano, CFO for Hire Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire Rafael Lee, General Public Paul Rapp, General Public Anasha Cummings, General Public Mike Robarge, The Troy Record II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Kevin O’Bryan opened the hearing and Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record: This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by 444 River Lofts, LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing. III. PROJECT SUMMARY 444 RIVER LOFTS, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed (collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold or other interest in certain parcels of real property located at, adjacent or near 444 River Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being primarily comprised of approximately .45 acres and identified as TMID No. 101.38-1-1, along with TMID Nos 101.38-2-20, 101.38-2-21, 101.38-1-2, 101.38-8- 3, 101.38-8-1, and adjacent realty) and the existing improvements located thereon, including a 5- story commercial building containing approximately 88,000 sf of rentable commercial space and related improvements located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”); (ii) the planning, design, rehabilitation, construction, reconstruction and renovation of the Existing Improvements and upon the Land of a mixed-use commercial facility that will include (A) 74 units of residential apartments, with (a) 24 of such units to be leased to households that, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and applicable regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and New York State Housing Finance Agency (“HFA”) and/or Division of Housing and Community Renewal (“DHCR”), have no more than 90% of area median income (“AMI”) and (b) 6 of such units to be leased to households that have no more than 60% AMI, (B) approximately 7,600 square feet of commercial and retail spaces on the first floor along with related amenities, along with renovations to the building structure, common areas, kitchen areas, laundry areas, heating systems, plumbing, roofs, elevators, windows, and other onsite and offsite parking, curbage and infrastructure improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”); (iii) the acquisition and installation in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain machinery, equipment and other items of tangible personal property (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and the Equipment, the “Facility”); and (iv) the leasing of the Facility back to the Company. It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of approximately $17,950,000. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company: Mortgage Recording Tax Exemptions ($9.0M Mortgage) = $108,470.00 Sales and Use Tax Exemptions (Estimated $7,000,000 in taxable materials) = $560,000.00 PILOT Savings - estimated = $8,934,700.49 Total estimated Financial Assistance = $9,603,187.49 IV. SEQRA: The Planning Commission of the City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”), will review the Project and it is contemplated that the Planning Commission will adopt a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”) with respect to the Project. VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS Anasha Cummings asked if the Jacob Street parcels will be a parking garage or surface parking. Mr. Miller advised it will be a surface lot. Mr. Cummings asked if there was any indication that the applicant will be collaborating with the Hedley Parking Garage project. The chairman advised that would be an item that the planning commission will be discussing as part of their review in December. Mr. Cummings asked if there was a previous application that contained more commercial. The chairman advised yes. Mr. Miller advised that the number of units has stayed about the same, but the mix of affordability has shifted. He added that there has always been about 6-7,000 square feet of either common or commercial space on the first floor. Mr. Miller explained that some of that has to do with flood plain issues. He added that the basement is a sub first floor so residential would not work there. Any commercial space would have to go in that space. Mr. Bodnar noted that this project has been going on for quite some time and it will be nice to see it fully rehabbed and up and running. He added that there is very little use that could be put in that building besides something like this; projects like this is one of the reasons we are in business. VII. ADJOURNMENT As there were no additional comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:11 a.m. PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION (Hendrick Hudson Building LLC Project) A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was convened on November 18, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York 12180. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the following members of the Authority were: MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT Kevin O’Bryan X Hon. Dean Bodnar X Hon. Robert Doherty X Louis Anthony X Paul Carroll X Adam Hotaling X Susan Farrell X Tina Urzan X The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Justin Miller, Cheryl Kennedy, Jim Lozano, Mary Ellen Flores, Rafael Lee, Paul Rapp, Larry Novak, Mike Robarge, Anasha Cummings and Denee Zeigler. After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a proposed project for the benefit of Hendrick Hudson Building LLC, for itself or an entity to be formed. On motion duly made by Tina Urzan and seconded by Paul Carroll, the following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority: Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent Kevin O’Bryan X Hon. Dean Bodnar X Hon. Robert Doherty X Louis Anthony X Paul Carroll X Adam Hotaling X Susan Farrell X Tina Urzan X Page 1 of 10 Resolution No. 11/16 #1 RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT OF HENDRICK HUDSON BUILDING LLC (THE “COMPANY”); (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT (“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, HENDRICK HUDSON BUILDING LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .32 acres of real property located at 200 Broadway, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.53-3-1.1) and the existing building parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon consisting principally of a seven story and approximately 80,000 square foot commercial office building (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a mixed-use commercial and residential facility, including the conversion of third and fourth floor levels to accommodate up to seventeen (17) residential apartment units, the upgrade and improvement of commercials spaces, exterior access and egress improvements, elevator, roof, window, utility and HVAC improvements, and parking, curbage, and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and WHEREAS, by resolution adopted October 14, 2016 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling, notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and (iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled, noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on November 18, 2016 whereat all interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or in writing on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as codified under Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and Regulations adopted pursuant thereto by the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State (collectively, “SEQRA”), the Authority has identified the undertaking of Project as an “Unlisted Action”, as defined pursuant to SEQRA and the Company has prepared an Environmental Assessment Form (“EAF”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated the terms of an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), a Lease Agreement (the “Lease Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related Payment-in-lieu-of-Tax Agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set forth within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the Company agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the term of the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of Financial Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating to one or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines that: (A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all powers granted to it under the Act; and (B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the Act; and Page 3 of 10 (C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and (D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and (E) Based upon a review of the Application and the EAF submitted to the Authority, the Agency hereby: (i) declares itself lead agency for an uncoordinated review of the Project, within the meaning of, and for all purposes of complying with SEQRA; (ii) accepts the EAF pursuant to SEQRA with respect to the construction, equipping and leasing of the Facility pursuant to SEQRA; and (iii) finds that the Project involves an “unlisted action” (as such quoted term is defined under SEQRA). The review is “uncoordinated” (as such quoted term is defined under SEQRA). Based upon the review by the Authority of the EAF and related documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby finds that (i) the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the environment” (as such quoted term is defined under SEQRA); and (iii) no “environmental impact statement” (as such quoted term is defined under SEQRA) need be prepared for this action. This determination constitutes a “negative declaration” (as such quoted terms are defined under SEQRA) for purposes of SEQRA. Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement. Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority Page 4 of 10 hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts, orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. The foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake the Project shall expire on September 1, 2017, unless extended by the Executive Director of the Authority upon written application by the Company. Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and local sales and use tax in an amount up to $1,664,480.00, which result in New York State and local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed $133,158.40. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s). Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture Event”). Page 5 of 10 As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority, cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority. Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A) the Agent Agreement, wherein the Authority will appoint the Company as agent to undertake the Project, (B) the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Authority, (C) the Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the Company, (D) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions (along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement, or in the discretion of the Executive Director, a sufficient guaranty of performance under the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement), and (E) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project. Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents, security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same, all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project. Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees, charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the Page 6 of 10 opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms, covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority. Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately. Page 7 of 10 EXHIBIT A PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS Page 9 of 10 PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Hendrick Hudson Building LLC NOVEMBER 18, 2016 AT 10:00 A.M. CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180 Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) regarding the 25 Morrison Avenue Assoc., LLC Project held on Friday November 18, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. I. ATTENDANCE Kevin O’Bryan, Chairman Hon. Dean Bodnar, Board Member Lou Anthony, Board Member Tina Urzan, Board Member Paul Carroll, Board Member Larry Novak, Bonacio Cheryl Kennedy, City of Troy Economic Development Coordinator James Lozano, CFO for Hire Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire Rafael Lee, General Public Paul Rapp, General Public Anasha Cummings, General Public Mike Robarge, The Troy Record II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Kevin O’Bryan opened the hearing and Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record: This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by Hendrick Hudson Building LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing. III. PROJECT SUMMARY HENDRICK HUDSON BUILDING LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .32 acres of real property located at 200 Broadway, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.53-3-1.1) and the existing building parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon consisting principally of a seven story and approximately 80,000 square foot commercial office building (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a mixed-use commercial and residential facility, including the conversion of third and fourth floor levels to accommodate up to seventeen (17) residential apartment units, the upgrade and improvement of commercials spaces, exterior access and egress improvements, elevator, roof, window, utility and HVAC improvements, and parking, curbage, and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company. It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. The Authority contemplates providing a PILOT Agreement with a term of Fifteen (15) years. IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of approximately $5,508,251. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company: Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 55,125.00 Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 133,158.40 Estimated PILOT Savings = $ 301,881.71 Total estimated Financial Assistance = $ 490,165.11 IV. SEQRA: For purposes of the Project, the Authority will serve as lead agency for purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA. VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments from the public. Board member Tina Urzan noted that the building is described as historic. She asked if the building is designated as a historic building and if so, which list was it on. She added that being designated can cause the construction prices to change. The board was not certain if it was listed on the registry or considered historic for other reasons. VII. ADJOURNMENT As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:05 a.m. EXHIBIT B SEQRA MATERIALS Page 10 of 10 INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION (Troy Lodging Associates LLC Project) A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was convened on December 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180. The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman and, upon roll being called, the following members of the Authority were: MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT Kevin O’Bryan Hon. Dean Bodnar Hon. Robert Doherty Steve Bouchey Louis Anthony Paul Carroll Adam Hotaling Susan Farrell Tina Urzan The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a proposed project for the benefit of Troy Lodging Associates LLC. On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority: Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent Kevin O’Bryan Hon. Dean Bodnar Hon. Robert Doherty Steve Bouchey Louis Anthony Paul Carroll Adam Hotaling Susan Farrell Tina Urzan Page 1 of 5 Resolution No. ____ RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF TROY LODGING ASSOCIATES LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii) AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii) DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended (hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and WHEREAS, TROY LODGING ASSOCIATES LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .75 acres of real property located at 1610 Sixth Avenue, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.62-1-1) and the existing parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a five story hotel facility comprised of approximately 45,000 square feet and 98 hotel rooms, along with a first floor parking garage, exterior access and egress improvements, curbage, utility and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is contemplating with respect to the Project; and WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below. Page 2 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines that: (A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all powers granted to it under the Act; and (B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the Act; and (C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and (D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated. Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E) related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and Page 3 of 5 indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation have been complied with. Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees, charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms, covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority. Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately. Page 4 of 5 SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF RENSSELAER ) I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the Resolution contained therein, held on December 16, 2016, with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters therein referred to. I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout said meeting. I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Authority this ____ day of __________, 2016. ______________________________ (SEAL) Page 5 of 5

Get email alerts for Troy

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting