Troy Industrial Development Authority
Regular MeetingTroy, NY · January 20, 2017
Minutes
Troy
Industrial Development Authority
January 20, 2017
10:00 AM
Meeting Minutes
Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Brian Carroll, Steve Strichman, Hon. Dean Bodnar, Hon. Robert
Doherty, Tina Urzan, Susan Farrell, Paul Carroll and Lou Anthony
Absent: Adam Hotaling
Also in attendance: Justin Miller, Cheryl Kennedy, Laura Wells, Jim Lozano, Mary
Ellen Flores, Deanne DalPos, Lucas Nathan and Denee Zeigler.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
I. Minutes
The board reviewed the minutes from the December 16, 2016 board
meeting.
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the December 16,
2016 meeting minutes.
Lou Anthony seconded the motion, motion carried.
II. Grant software
Mr. Strichman spoke to the board about grant software that they have been
looking into that could be utilized by the LDC, IDA, CRC and the city. He advised
that it is used by economic development offices and communities across the
country. Ms. Wells advised that the cost is $12,404.20 per year for a three year
contract. Mr. Strichman advised that he would like to propose that this board
along with the CRC split the cost. Mr. Doherty asked if it is a multi-year contract.
Ms. Wells advised yes it is a three year contract. The board asked if she is
confident that the software will give us more returns. Ms. Wells advised that this
software is used by towns and cities all over the country. She advised it is called
E-Civis and has spoken with some of the users of the program. Ms. Wells added
that they will teach us how to include the cost of the software in future grants.
Mr. Doherty asked if it will give us additional money or just make grant
management easier. Ms. Wells advised that there are statistics out there to
show increases in funds received when using this software. Mr. Bodnar asked
what kind of advantage this would give us. Ms. Wells explained that the
software will assist us in finding grants from both governmental and private
sources. She advised that we have a good handle on the governmental grants,
but would like to look more into the private sources. Ms. Wells noted that this
software was designed and developed for municipal entities to use, so it is very
streamlined for this purpose. She advised that it will also assist with researching
and management of grants. Mr. Doherty asked if assistance is given for
community groups to search for grants. Ms. Wells advised, yes. For a small fee
we can bring on groups to allow them to search for opportunities. Ms. Urzan
asked if the cost is for a certain amount of people. Ms. Wells advised it will be
1
for ten users. Ms. Urzan asked if it renews automatically or if you have a chance
to cancel if you are not happy. Ms. Wells was not sure of those specific policies,
but will look into and let them know. Ms. Urzan asked for clarification about the
storing of information to be used for future grants. Ms. Wells advised yes. She
has also heard great things about their customer service department. Ms. Wells
advised that there is also a capability to integrate with the city’s finances. Ms.
Urzan asked if the software will help search for the demographics and
information. Ms. Wells advised that she is not sure, but will look into it. Ms.
Urzan asked if there is any other software that you were looking at. Ms. Wells
advised that other software was looked at, but they were not strong on the
administration piece. Mr. Miller advised we may have to look into how it will
work with NYS grants and how it will help with the CFA process. Ms. Wells
advised that she is familiar with the CFA process, but not sure how it ties into
this software. She added that each CFA grant has specific questions that need
to be answered and the questions are not the same each round. Ms. Wells
noted that this software would assist with foundations and other funding grants
that are out there. Mr. Miller noted that we have a procurement policy that
needs to be followed and may have to put this out to bid. Ms. Wells explained to
the board that she was able to get the price down and secure the 2016 pricing
for this meeting. We will need to review two other offers at our next meeting
where a decision can be made. The chairman advised that we will table the
grant request for this meeting and come back to it in February.
III. Introduction of Brian Carroll – new board member
The chairman introduced Brian Carroll to the board and advised that the position
of vice chairman is still vacant. Mr. Carroll has agreed to accept that position.
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve Brian Carroll as Vice
Chairman.
Susan Farrell seconded the motion, motion carried.
Mr. Carroll spoke about his career with the electric/natural gas energy business.
He advised that throughout his 45 years, he has dealt with a lot of economic
development issues within the state and outside of the country.
IV. Brownfield Grant opportunity
Mr. Strichman spoke about a brownfield grant opportunity for South Troy. He
advised that the process was started about 10 years ago, but we never got to
the nomination stage which offers tax credits. The remediation tax credits run
between 22-44%. He advised there is also a credit for investment on that site.
It will run from the King Fuels site, north to the canal. Mr. Strichman advised
that it will cost approximately $100,000 to $150,000 to get this to the nomination
level. There would be a 10% match commitment on the IDA level. He added
that the submission is due March 1st and a public hearing scheduled. The
chairman advised that we spoke about this during the LDC meeting earlier today.
That board will be most impacted because they own a significant piece of
property in that area. He added that this would be another tool to finding a
solution. Mr. Strichman advised that the King Fuels site is surrounded by city,
county, LDC and privately owned land.
V. PARIS Report
2
Mr. Strichman spoke about the upcoming report that is sent each year to the
ABO; due March 31st. He advised the annual report outlines our finances and the
different projects completed throughout the year. Mr. Strichman noted that an
audit needs to be done as part of the PARIS report. The chairman stressed the
importance of the report and would like it to be timely and accurate.
VI. Executive Director Report
Mr. Strichman presented his executive director report to the board members. He
advised that we may have another application similar to 200 Broadway;
conversion from commercial to residential.
TRU Hotel will be back next advised that the project at 515 River Street was
tabled at the last planning meeting in order to discuss the bicycle trail that is set
to go behind the property. Mr. Strichman advised there is an easement in place
and they will be working with the South Troy trial group. He added that the
applicant is in need of all of the parking spots; it will be something they need to
work out.
Mr. Strichman advised that 444 River Street was pulled from this agenda and will
be discussed at the next meeting. He added that we don’t expect any changes
to the deal.
Mr. Strichman advised that there are three projects in the pipeline; a downtown
residential project, office space and the Canon building.
VII. Financials
Ms. Flores advised that there is $875,000 in assets with no liabilities leaving
$875,000 in equity. There was not much of a change from last month.
Ms. Flores advised that there is a loss for the month, but none of it was
significant expenses.
The chairman advised that we should have a discussion on what to do with our
liquidity as far as moving projects forward. Mr. Bodnar noted that we seem to
be doing better with our receivables. Ms. Flores agrees and noted that we are
able to reach out to them in a timely manner if their payment is late. Mr. Bodnar
asked about the procedure when a payment is late. Ms. Flores spoke about the
process and noted that if the payment shows up on the next balance sheet by
the next meeting, the executive director would make a call. The board had a
general discussion on how having an independent financial team has helped
things moved along and keep them up to date. Mr. Lozano noted that we have a
way to track things and get them out timely. Mr. Miller has helped out a great
deal with questions. Mr. Doherty noted that receivables are minimal. Ms. Flores
advised that is correct. The only receivable showing is a late fee on one of the
PILOTs.
Mr. Lozano advised the board that as of January 1, 2017 we were acquired by
BST, the auditor’s for this board. He added that is a conflict and will be meeting
with them later today to discuss a plan going forward. Mr. Lozano advised that if
they need to step down as the auditor, they will assist with getting the process
completed. Mr. Miller advised that we will need to issue an RFP immediately in
3
order to find a new auditor and get to work right away. We may have to have a
special meeting to get an approval and engage a new firm. Mr. Miller added that
we need to find an auditor ASAP in order to have it approved for the March 31st
deadline.
Paul Carroll made a motion to accept the financials as presented.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
VIII. Adjourn the IDA portion
The chairman noted that we have a CRC agenda to discuss.
Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA portion of the
meeting and convened the CRC.
Susan Farrell seconded the motion, motion carried.
The IDA was adjourned at 10:43 a.m.
The IDA was reconvened at 10:51 a.m.
IX. New Business
Mr. Strichman advised there is no new business.
X. Old Business
Mr. Strichman noted that there is an item that we will need to discuss in executive
session.
Tina Urzan made a motion to enter into executive session in
order discuss the proposed acquisition, sale or lease of real
property.
Paul Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried.
The board returned from executive session with no action taken.
XI. Adjournment
With no other items to discuss, the IDA portion of the meeting was adjourned at
11:20 a.m.
Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
4
Agenda
Chairman
Troy
Kevin O’Bryan
Industrial Development
Authority
Vice-Chair
vacant
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
Executive Director January 20, 2017
10:00 a.m.
Steven Strichman
Planning Department Conference
Board Members
Room
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Mr. Paul Carroll
Hon. Robert Doherty
AGENDA
Louis Anthony
Tina Urzan
Adam Hotaling
Susan Farrell
I. Approval of Minutes from the December 16, 2016 board meeting.
II. Grants software
III. Brownfields Grant opportunity
IV. Upcoming PARIS report
V. Executive Session
VI. Executive Director’s Report
VII. Financials
VIII. Old Business
IX. New Business
X. Adjournment
City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180
Phone: 518.279.7166
Troy
Industrial Development Authority
December 16, 2016
10:00 AM
Meeting Minutes
Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Steve Strichman, Hon. Dean Bodnar, Hon. Robert Doherty,
Tina Urzan, Susan Farrell and Lou Anthony
Absent: Paul Carroll and Adam Hotaling
Also in attendance: Robert Ryan, Cheryl Kennedy, Jim Lozano, Mary Ellen Flores,
Deanne DalPos, Sharon Martin, Lucas Nathan, Andy Patel, Kalpen Patel, Minesh Patel,
Tom Sawyer and Denee Zeigler.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
I. Minutes
D
The board reviewed the minutes from the November 18, 2016 board
meeting.
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the November 18,
R
2016 meeting minutes.
Lou Anthony seconded the motion, motion carried.
II. Mlock Parcel
T
AF
Mr. Strichman advised the board that they did extend the option to purchase the
lot and in the meantime, the City of Troy has received a grant in the amount of
$450,000 to help purchase the site. He added that they will be working with the
new owner of 701 River Street to come up with a plan for the site. The board
looked forward to discussing it at further board meetings.
III. Troy Lodging Associates, LLC – Initial Project Resolution
Mr. Strichman introduced the people from Visions Hotel to discuss the project.
He advised that the project has received planning commission approvals for a
hotel to be built at the corner of Fifth Avenue and Congress Street. Mr. Patel
explained that this project is a Hilton brand called Tru. This particular brand is
geared towards millennials; less time is spent in the rooms and more in the
lobby. The lobby is much larger than other hotels and contains activities for the
guests to do and interact with each other. He advised that there will be 98
rooms. Mr. Patel advised there are some challenges that we faced with the small
site; it has caused the cost of the project to increase by about $2 Million. He
added that after going through the planning commission it was requested that
they have three stair towers, update the facade and add underground parking.
He advised they would like to start in May. Mr. Patel expects about 28,000
guests each year. He added that they recently finished a hotel project in East
Greenbush. This project will take between 14-18 months to complete due to the
underground parking and other site work. Ms. Urzan asked how many stories
1
the building will be. Mr. Patel advised five stories; including the underground
parking. Ms. Urzan asked how many parking spots there will be. Mr. Patel
advised that they will have a little fewer than 93 parking spots, but we have
worked out with the City that there is additional parking in the surrounding
areas. Ms. Urzan asked if there is a restaurant no site. Mr. Patel advised no and
added that all of the activities will be in the lobby. He explained that the model
is designed to have people congregate in the lobby and mingle instead of in
small groups in the rooms. Mr. Doherty asked about their background and other
projects they have completed. Mr. Patel advised that he started in the hotel
business about 25 years ago. They have completed most of their projects in
upstate New York; the Utica/Buffalo/Rochester area. Mr. Patel advised that the
Visions company tries to give back to the communities they build in. He talked
about some of the community events that they hold and services they extend to
the surrounding residents; holiday events and assistance to fire victims. The
board asked who the property was purchased from. Mr. Patel advised they
bought the land from Mr. Ucellini. He added that this is our first downtown
hotel. Ms. Urzan asked how many employees. Mr. Patel advised that this is their
first Tru project and he is planning on 10-15 local employees. Ms. Urzan asked
about the landscaping. Mr. Patel advised that the site is very tight so there will
be minimal landscaping, but he will do as much as they can to soften the look of
the site. Ms. Urzan asked about the underground parking. Mr. Patel advised
D
that they will enter in from Sixth Ave and the main hotel entrance will be on
Seventh Ave. He added that they will have a circular drop off at the entrance
and a deck/patio area outside on the first floor. The board agreed that this is an
important corner that is considered a gateway to the downtown and City Station
R
across the street. The chairman advised that this project already has planning
approval, but we will get another look at this project. Mr. Bodnar asked about
the exterior of the building. Mr. Patel advised this was something they discussed
during the planning process and it was decided that the stucco look they usually
T
have on the outside is not going to be used. He added that the hotel will have a
AF
more urban, modern look to it. (See attached Resolution 12/16 #1)
Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to approve the Initial Project
Resolution for Troy Lodging Associates, LLC project.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
IV. Executive Director Report
Mr. Strichman advised that the project at 515 River Street was tabled at the last
planning meeting in order to discuss the bicycle trail that is set to go behind the
property. Mr. Strichman advised there is an easement in place and they will be
working with the South Troy trial group. He added that the applicant is in need
of all of the parking spots; it will be something they need to work out.
Mr. Strichman advised that 444 River Street was pulled from this agenda and will
be discussed at the next meeting. He added that we don’t expect any changes
to the deal.
Mr. Strichman advised that there are three projects in the pipeline; a downtown
residential project, office space and the Canon building.
V. Financials
2
Ms. Flores advised that there is $915,000 in assets versus $38,000 in liabilities
leaving $877,000 in equity. There are no other items of significance on the
balance sheet.
Ms. Flores advised that the profit and loss report shows a $2,500 in loss for the
month and $566,000 profit for the year.
Susan Farrell made a motion to accept the financials as
presented.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
VI. Old Business
No old business to discuss.
VII. New Business
Mr. Strichman reminded the board members to complete the end of the year
board member evaluations.
The chairman advised that the Mayor has decided on a replacement for vice
D
chairman, Mr. Bouchey. He added that if anyone was interested in the position,
please come forward. If not, the replacement person will be a good fit for the
position.
R
The board had a general discussion about the Troy school board representative.
Mr. Strichman advised that we will have our annual meeting next month.
T
Mr. Doherty wanted to note the importance of Steve’s position in the city and on
AF
the boards. Mr. Strichman advised that he really enjoys working here and noted
that the politics were a little different than he expected. He added that it is
challenging due to resource issues, but he has starting to understand the
strengths of his staff and would like to spend some additional time working on
the LDC and IDA projects. Mr. Strichman noted that there is a lot of great
opportunity here. He is looking forward to moving some of the big projects
forward. Mr. Bodnar spoke about the positive, notable changes that have
occurred over the last six years downtown. The chairman agreed and hoped
that there will be more projects to come and developers that are willing to come
to Troy. Mr. Doherty noted a few mistakes along the way, but moving forward
we will do better. The board agreed that we need to keep the statements
positive in order to move these important projects forward and keep them
coming in. Mr. Doherty agreed and advised some pushback is okay, but the
comments must be constructive.
VIII. Adjournment
With no other items to discuss, the IDA portion of the meeting was adjourned at
10:42 a.m.
Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting.
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
3
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(Troy Lodging Associates LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on December 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy,
New York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
D
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Adam Hotaling
X
X
X
Susan Farrell
Tina Urzan
R X
X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Robert Ryan, Cheryl Kennedy, Jim
T
Lozano, Mary Ellen Flores, Deanne DalPos, Sharon Martin, Lucas Nathan, Andy Patel, Kalpen
Patel, Minesh Patel, Tom Sawyer and Denee Zeigler.
AF
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of Troy Lodging Associates LLC.
On motion duly made by Hon. Bob Doherty and seconded by Tina Urzan, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Adam Hotaling X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 5
Resolution No. 12/16 #1
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF TROY
LODGING ASSOCIATES LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION WITH
A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii)
AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A
PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii)
DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
D
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, TROY LODGING ASSOCIATES LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an
R
entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with
a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately .75 acres of real property located at 1610 Sixth Avenue, Troy, New
T
York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.62-1-1) and the
existing parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the “Existing
AF
Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, and improvement of the
Land and Existing Improvements into a five story hotel facility comprised of approximately
45,000 square feet and 98 hotel rooms, along with a first floor parking garage, exterior access
and egress improvements, curbage, utility and related exterior improvements (collectively, the
“Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible
personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of
the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”,
and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the
“Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
Page 2 of 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D)
D The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
R
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
T
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
AF
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent
Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the
Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title
to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority
leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to
which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E)
related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement
include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
Page 3 of 5
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are
consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation
have been complied with.
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
D
R
T
AF
Page 4 of 5
T
AF
R
D
Get email alerts for Troy
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.