Troy Industrial Development Authority
Regular MeetingTroy, NY · July 14, 2017
Minutes
Troy
Industrial Development Authority
July 14, 2017
10:00 AM
Meeting Minutes
Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Tina Urzan, Steve Strichman, Brian Carroll, Hon. Robert
Doherty, Paul Carroll, Susan Farrell, Hon. Dean Bodnar and Lou Anthony
Absent: Adam Hotaling
Also in attendance: Robert Ryan, Joe Masher, Kate Jarosh, Larry Novik, Sharon
Martin, Cheryl Kennedy, Ken Crowe, John Fetscher, Darrell Camp, Asa Stackel, Patti
O’Brien, Deanna DalPos, Mary Ellen Flores and Denee Zeigler.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
I. Minutes
The board reviewed the minutes from the June 16, 2017 board meeting.
Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to approve the June 16,
2017 meeting minutes.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
II. Initial Project Resolution – Bow Tie Cinemas Project, BTP Monument Square, LLC
Mr. Strichman spoke to the board about the Bow Tie cinema projects that are
located in Schenectady and Saratoga. He advised that they have been great
generators of business for those areas; sales tax, local businesses, etc. He
added that currently there is a major leakage of movie theater/entertainment
revenue going to surrounding areas. Mr. Strichman advised that the building is
about 45,000 square feet and they have had some discussion on a PILOT
structure, but nothing specific at this time, although, it will likely go out 25 years.
Mr. Strichman introduced Larry Novik and Kate Jarosh from Bonacio Construction
and Joe Masher from Bow Tie Cinemas.
Mr. Novik advised that most of the board and public are probably familiar with
the project at this point, so he will go over the project briefly and then take time
to answer questions. He explained that they will be here for the planning
workshop next week and are on the agenda for the end of the month. Mr. Novik
advised that Bow Tie Cinemas is taking a large risk in this project and we
appreciate this board’s time as well as the city’s. Mr. Novik explained that he
was involved personally in the effort to bring Bow Tie to Saratoga Springs and he
can attest to the change that can happen in a downtown due to a project like
this. He added that the theaters act as a magnet that brings people to the
downtown and the surrounding benefits by local establishments.
Mr. Masher advised that they are looking to construct a new building that will
contain 11 screening rooms with seat counts ranging from 200 to down to 75.
1
He noted that they will be luxury seats; meaning electric reclining chairs and full
food and beverage options. He added that the theaters are priced competitively
with other theaters in the country. Mr. Masher advised they are doing their first
luxury concept in Norwalk, Connecticut, but is excited to bring this concept to his
hometown of Troy, NY. Mr. Masher advised that luxury concept generally
increases attendance, especially if it is the first one in the region. He advised
that they are trying to take in everyone’s design considerations and does not
want to create a box building. Mr. Masher presented a rendering of their initial
concept. He advised they hope to create an area where cars can pull in and
drop people off as well as creating an access point to the river and a parking
area. Mr. Masher advised that there will be a balcony area where people can sit
and enjoy the view or their dinner before the show. He advised that they are
also keeping an eye on the parking situation.
The chairman advised we will take questions and comments on the Bow Tie
cinema part of the project and then will discuss the American Theater project.
Tina Urzan asked for clarification on the number of screens and seats. Mr.
Masher advised that it will be 11 screens and approximately 1300 seats in all;
each auditorium will have a different amount of seats. He advised that the seats
will be the same in all auditoriums; only the number will vary. Ms. Urzan asked
about how this seating is different than what we have seen in this area. Mr.
Masher advised that they will have generous spacing between them, will be
electric recliners and have a swing up tray. He added that they will be built on
platforms, they are not a traditional stadium seating. Ms. Urzan asked if there
will be traditional concessions. He advised yes and will include more dinner type
of options. Ms. Urzan asked about the ticket prices. Mr. Masher advised that
they ticket prices will be comparable to other theaters in the area. Ms. Urzan
asked about the number of full time employees. Mr. Masher advised that they
will have 8 full time management employees and about 50-75 part time
employees between the two buildings. Ms. DalPos asked about the plan for
Front Street. Mr. Novik advised that they will be working with the planning
board on that later this month as well as historic review. Mr. Novik did explain
that the intent is that Front Street will carry through underneath their building.
Ms. DalPos asked if the building will include space for retail. Mr. Novik advised
no retail space included in this design. Brian Carroll asked if there are any
anticipated changes in cost that may come up during the planning process. Mr.
Novik advised no, not to his knowledge. He added that if the planning board
were to request a major change to the building design, then the costs may
change. (See attached Resolution 07/17 #1)
Brian Carroll made a motion to approve the Initial Project
Resolution for Bow Tie Cinemas Project, BTP Monument Square,
LLC.
Paul Carroll seconded the motion.
Ayes 7 Nays 1 Absent 1, motion carried.
III. Initial Project Resolution – Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC – American Cinema
Redevelopment Project
Mr. Novik spoke to the board about the historic theater located on River Street
that they purchased several years ago. He advised that when the Bow Tie
project started, there was also some interest in redeveloping the smaller theater.
Mr. Masher advised that he has always been interested in the American Theater
2
and would like to see it used specifically for independent films. Mr. Bodnar
asked about the structure of the building which has been vacant for quite a
while. Mr. Novik advised that this building is in great shape, adding that a new
roof was put on shortly before it closed which has helped to keep it from the
elements. Mr. Bodnar asked if they are confident in being able to restore this
building. Mr. Masher advised that there is not much work that is needed to the
inside and only some minor façade work is needed. Mr. Novik agreed and added
that the marquee that was taken down before they purchased it was not the
original. He noted that they will be in further discussions to see how much
historic renovations will take place. Ms. Urzan asked about the risk of this
project. Mr. Masher advised that he is confident that the downtown will respond
well to these projects. He did note that Troy has not had a movie theater in
quite some time and it is a much different place than it was even ten years ago.
He advised that the city is vibrant and full of activity these days and a movie
theater would be a great addition. Mr. Novik added that they have also noted a
nice momentum curve; a long term vision is needed in order to see the potential.
He noted that a large company such as Bow Tie has seen the potential also and
is willing to take a chance in Troy. Mr. Masher explained that Bow Tie cinemas
have a great history of successful management. He advised that they have put
theaters in places with high crime rates and the presence of the theater helped
to turn the area around. The board had a general discussion of the success of
the Bow Tie project in Schenectady. Mr. Doherty wanted to note that
throughout this whole process, Bow Tie Cinemas and Bonacio Construction have
been very professional and feels this will continue through to the project. He
added that through several public meetings, there was discussion about
connecting this space to the very important Hudson River. Mr. Novik spoke
about the design of the building and how they want the site to connect to the
riverfront. He explained that the one of their buildings is located next to the
riverfront park staircase that was put in a few years ago. Mr. Novik found that
people do not congregate at the railing on the top deck enjoying the view of the
river, rather, people use the staircase all of the time as a connection to another
space. He advised that the idea of an open hole to the river is not as compelling
as an active space with the energy of people coming and going, connecting them
to other areas of the city.
Brian Carrol asked if there have been anything in the discussions with the
planning board that would significantly change the cost of this project. Mr. Novik
advised no, the size of this project will not change. Brian Carroll asked for
clarification on a piece of information he read about the fact that the American
Theater project will be done in conjunction with 1 Monument Sq and that both
projects would not move forward without assistance. Mr. Masher explained that
the statement regarding the projects being done in conjunction comes from the
idea that they would not be as successful with the smaller American Theater
project if the larger one at 1 Monument Square was not going to happen. Mr.
Novik added that Bonacio Construction has been struggling to find an alternate
use for the American Theater site for any other use for quite some time. He
advised that when Bow Tie expressed an interest, they realized it was a great
opportunity to keep it as a theater. Brian Carroll asked if the American Theater
project doesn’t go through, will 1 Monument Square still happen. Mr. Novik
explained that it would be a shame to not move the project forward; there may
not be another opportunity like this. Mr. Strichman outlined that next steps in
the process and explained they should be back to us in September. (See
attached Resolution 07/17 #2)
3
Lou Anthony made the motion to approve the Initial Project
Resolution for Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC – American Cinema
Redevelopment Project.
Bob Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried.
IV. Executive Directors report
701 River Street - Mr. Strichman advised that the project has submitted their
application to the planning commission for July.
515 River Street – Mr. Strichman advised no updates on this project, but will
reach out again and advise the board of any updates.
V. Financials
Ms. Flores advised that the balance sheet shows $817,000 in assets versus
$817,000 in equity; no change.
Ms. Flores advised not much change with the operating statement either. She
advised that there is a loss of $18,000 for the month which is made up of
professional services.
Brian Carroll made a motion to accept the financials as
presented.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
VI. Old Business
No new business to discuss.
VII. New Business
The chairman advised that we will not have a meeting in August.
VIII. Adjournment
With no other items to discuss, the IDA portion of the meeting was adjourned at
10:38 a.m. Next meeting will be September 15th.
Tina Urzan made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting.
Brian Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried.
4
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(Bow Tie Cinemas Project, BTP Monument Square, LLC)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on July 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New
York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Kevin O’Bryan X
Brian Carroll X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Adam Hotaling X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Robert Ryan, Joe Masher, Kate Jarosh,
Larry Novik, Sharon Martin, Cheryl Kennedy, Ken Crowe, John Fetscher, Darrell Camp, Asa
Stackel, Patti O’Brien, Deanna DalPos, Mary Ellen Flores and Denee Zeigler.
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of BTP Monument Square, LLC.
On motion duly made by Brian Carroll and seconded by Paul Carroll, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan X
Brian Carroll X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Adam Hotaling X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 5
Resolution No. 07/17 #1
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF BTP
MONUMENT SQUARE, LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION WITH
A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii)
AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A
PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii)
DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, BTP MONUMENT SQUARE, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an
entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with
a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately 1.57 acres of real property located at One Monument Square, Troy,
New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 101.53-1-1,
101.45-5-4.1, 101.45-5-5 and 100.60-1-2) and the existing site and infrastructure improvements
located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering,
construction, and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into approximately
43,000 square feet of retail space consisting of an 8-10 screen multiplex movie theater, along
with parking improvements for approximately 100-130 vehicles, exterior access and egress
improvements, curbage, utility and related exterior improvements (collectively, the
“Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible
personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of
the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”,
and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the
“Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
Page 2 of 5
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent
Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the
Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title
to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority
leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to
Page 3 of 5
which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E)
related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement
include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are
consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation
have been complied with.
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 4 of 5
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC – American Cinema Redevelopment Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on July 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New
York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Kevin O’Bryan X
Brian Carroll X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Adam Hotaling X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Robert Ryan, Joe Masher, Kate Jarosh,
Larry Novik, Sharon Martin, Cheryl Kennedy, Ken Crowe, John Fetscher, Darrell Camp, Asa
Stackel, Patti O’Brien, Deanna DalPos, Mary Ellen Flores and Denee Zeigler.
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC.
On motion duly made by Lou Anthony and seconded by Hon. Bob Doherty, the
following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development
Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan X
Brian Carroll X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Adam Hotaling X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 5
Resolution No. 07/17 #2
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF
DAUCHY/RIVER TRIANGLE, LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION
WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii)
AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A
PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii)
DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, DAUCHY/RIVER TRIANGLE, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an
entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with
a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately .17 acres of real property located at 285-289 River Street, Troy, New
York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.45-5-3) and the
existing building structure located thereon consisting principally of a multi-story former movie
theater (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction,
reconstruction, rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into an
modern movie theater, the upgrade and improvement of commercials space, exterior access and
egress improvements, mechanical, roof, window, utility and HVAC improvements, and parking,
curbage, signage and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the
acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and
incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the
Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility
to the Company and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
Page 2 of 5
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent
Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the
Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title
Page 3 of 5
to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority
leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to
which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E)
related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement
include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are
consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation
have been complied with.
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 4 of 5
Agenda
Chairman
Troy
Kevin O’Bryan
Industrial Development
Authority
Vice-Chair
Brian Carroll
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
Executive Director July 14, 2017
10:00 a.m.
Steven Strichman
Planning Department Conference
Board Members
Room
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Mr. Paul Carroll
Hon. Robert Doherty
AGENDA
Louis Anthony
Tina Urzan
Adam Hotaling
Susan Farrell
I. Approval of Minutes from the June 16, 2017 board meeting.
II. Initial Project Resolution – BTP Monument Square, LLC ‐ 1 Monument Square
III. Initial Project Resolution – Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC ‐ American Theater, 285 River Street
IV. Executive Director Report
V. Financials
VI. Old Business
VII. New Business
VIII. Adjournment
City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180
Phone: 518.279.7166
Troy
Industrial Development Authority
June 16, 2017
10:00 AM
Meeting Minutes
Present: Kevin O’Bryan, Tina Urzan, Steve Strichman, Brian Carroll, Hon. Robert
Doherty, Susan Farrell, Hon. Dean Bodnar and Lou Anthony
Absent: Paul Carroll, Lou Anthony and Adam Hotaling
Also in attendance: Robert Ryan, David Sarraf, Deanna DalPos, Mary Ellen Flores and
Denee Zeigler.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
I. Public Hearing – 10 River Street, LLC
See attached Public Hearing Agenda.
II. D
Minutes
The board reviewed the minutes from the May 19, 2017 board meeting.
R
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the May 19, 2017
meeting minutes.
T
Hon. Dean Bodnar seconded the motion, motion carried.
AF
III. Project Authorizing Resolution – 10 River Street, LLC
Mr. Strichman advised that they have been negotiating for some time on this
project bringing it down to a 20 year PILOT. He advised this project is in area
that needs investment and is close to a thriving neighborhood. The chairman
wanted to note that this building is currently paying taxes. He advised that if the
property continued to pay the taxes over the next 20 years, the property would
generate about $897,000 in taxes. With the improvements and PILOT, the taxes
being paid over the course of the PILOT will be $2 million. He added that he
would like to see more of this happening in other parts of the city. Mr.
Strichman noted that there will be 80 market rate apartments that will bring in
people to eat, shop and live in that area. (See attached Resolution 06/17 #1)
Hon. Bob Doherty made a motion to approve the Project
Authorizing Resolution for 10 River Street, LLC.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
IV. Mlock parcel subdivision
Mr. Strichman advised that we previously spoke about the subdivision of the
Mlock parcel. He advised that the survey cost is $3,600 and was done by RDM
Surveying.
1
Brian Carroll made the motion to approve a payment of $3,600
to RDM Surveying for the subdivision survey of the Mlock parcel.
Hon. Bob Doherty seconded the motion, motion carried.
V. UTEP
The chairman noted that we will discuss this item and our policy and procedures
at another time.
VI. Executive Directors report
Five One Five River Street, LLC - Mr. Strichman advised that the project at 515
River Street is moving forward. They are currently working on some small re-
designs.
Troy Lodging Associates, LLC – Mr. Strichman advised that TRU Visions Hotel are
finalizing their plans in order to submit to the building department in July.
701 River Street – Mr. Strichman advised that the project that is located in front
of the Mlock parcel plans to be at the July planning meeting.
D
1 Monument Square – Mr. Strichman noted that Bowtie Cinemas are also
planning on submitting plans to get on the July planning agenda.
Mr. Strichman noted that he is anticipating an application for the property across
VII.
R
from the Ale House. He advised that the site will be the new home of a
brewery/restaurant.
Financials
T
AF
Ms. Flores advised that the balance sheet has not changed since last month.
She noted that the outstanding item listed for Uncle Sam Garages has been
collected and will be reflected on an upcoming balance sheet. The board asked
about the $500,000 in fixed assets. Ms. Flores advised that the amount will
decrease over time. Ms. Flores noted a $9,000 loss in May that was for
professional services; Bonadio for audit services and the eCivis grant software.
She noted that 50% of the cost for eCivis will come back to us in the form of a
grant from the CRC, which will show in the June financials. Ms. Flores wanted to
note in the income section we received application fees from Redburn and 2
River Street. She advised that the other income is penalty charges on late fees
which will not show on statements going forward. They will be passed onto the
city.
Mr. Bodnar asked about the Bonadio audit services that we received and if we
were satisfied with the work they did. The board had a discussion about the
auditing services and advised that it was always the understanding that we
would be sending out a new RFP.
Tina Urzan made a motion to accept the financials as presented.
Susan Farrell seconded the motion, motion carried.
VIII. Old Business
2
No new business to discuss.
IX. New Business
The chairman advised that we have talked about a fee sharing arrangement
between the IDA and the LDC in the case when the LDC brings a deal forward to
the IDA. Mr. Strichman advised this thought came up specifically with the
project at 444 River Street because of the fact that the LDC made that deal a
possibility. The chairman advised that this will help to set the stage for other
deals we may do. Mr. Carroll asked if the language for each of the boards allows
them to be able to do something such as this. Mr. Ryan advised that they are
each set up under a different set of guidelines; the IDA is set up under the
general municipal laws and the LDC is under not for profit laws. He advised that
the general municipal laws are a little stricter when it comes to funds. Mr. Ryan
noted that funds going from the IDA to the LDC will have to have an agreement
in place and has to be a fee that is earned, not granted. Mr. Carroll asked if we
would ever be in the situation where funds would becoming the other way; from
the LDC to the IDA. The board advised no. Mr. Doherty advised that he would
like to see some policy background on how or why this would be set up; an
example. The board advised that the project at 444 River Street is a great
example and we will circulate additional information for the next meeting.
X.
D
Adjournment
With no other items to discuss, the IDA portion of the meeting was adjourned at
R
10:28 a.m. Due to some conflicts with the next meeting date of July 21st, the
board agreed to move it up a week to July 14th.
Sue Farrell made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting.
T
Brian Carroll seconded the motion, motion carried.
AF
3
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
10 RIVER STREET LLC
JUNE 16, 2017 AT 10:00 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the 10 River Street LLC Project held on Friday June 16, 2017 at 10:00
a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Steven Strichman, Executive Director
Kevin O’Bryan, Chairman
Brian Carroll, Vice Chairman
Hon. Bob Doherty, Board Member
Hon. Dean Bodnar, Board Member
D
Tina Urzan, Board Member
Sue Farrell, Board Member
David Sarraf, Company Representative
Robert Ryan, Esq., Harris Beach
R
Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire
Deanna DalPos, General Public
II.
T
CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Kevin O’Bryan opened the hearing and Robert
AF
Ryan read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by 10 River Street LLC to
the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the
general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
10 RIVER STREET LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed
(collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project
(the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in
approximately 1.16 acre parcel of real property located at 2 River Street, Troy, New York 12180
along with portions of a parcel of real property located at 245 First Street, Troy, New York
12180 (collectively, the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 100.76-9-24
and a portion of TMID No. 100.84-2-2) and the existing 4.5-story building located at 2 River
Street, along with related parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the
“Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction,
rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a residential
apartment facility containing up to 80 apartment units to be leased by the Company to residential
tenants, including improvements to and replacements of roofs, interior and exterior utilities,
elevator, building systems, windows, exterior access and egress improvements, curbage, parking,
landscaping and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the
acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and
incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the
Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility
to the Company; and
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
D
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
R
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. The Authority contemplates
providing a PILOT Agreement with a term of Twenty (20) years.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
T
AF
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $13,500,000. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 100,000.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 430,000.00
Estimated PILOT Savings = $3,593,927.00
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $ 4,123,927.00
IV. SEQRA:
For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for
purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Hon. Bob Doherty asked for clarification on the project site. Mr. Sarraf advised that
Adams Street is the nearest cross street. Ms. Urzan asked for clarification on the new entrance
and the parcel 245 1st street. Mr. Sarraf advised that the parcel is directly south of the project
site. The main entrance will be on the 1st Street side, opening up itself to the neighborhood. He
added that the entrance on River Street will remain, but only used as another form of egress. Ms.
Urzan asked about parking. Mr. Sarraf advised that only one parking lot is planned at this point.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:05 a.m.
D
R
T
AF
PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(10 River Street LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on June 16, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York
12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Brian Carroll X
D
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Adam Hotaling
X
X
X
Susan Farrell
Tina Urzan
R X
X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: David Sarraf, Robert Ryan, Esq., Deanna
T
DalPos, Mary Ellen Flores and Denee Zeigler.
AF
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of 10 River Street LLC, for itself or an entity to be formed.
On motion duly made by Hon. Bob Doherty and seconded by Tina Urzan, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan X
Hon. Dean Bodnar X
Hon. Robert Doherty X
Brian Carroll X
Louis Anthony X
Paul Carroll X
Adam Hotaling X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 9
Resolution No. 06/17 #1
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A
CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT
OF 10 RIVER STREET LLC (THE “COMPANY”); (ii) ADOPTING FINDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT
(“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
D
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
R
WHEREAS, 10 RIVER STREET LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be
formed (collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain
project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in
T
approximately 1.16 acre parcel of real property located at 2 River Street, Troy, New York 12180
along with portions of a parcel of real property located at 245 First Street, Troy, New York
AF
12180 (collectively, the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 100.76-9-24
and a portion of TMID No. 100.84-2-2) and the existing 4.5-story building located at 2 River
Street, along with related parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the
“Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction,
rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a residential
apartment facility containing up to 80 apartment units to be leased by the Company to residential
tenants, including improvements to and replacements of roofs, interior and exterior utilities,
elevator, building systems, windows, exterior access and egress improvements, curbage, parking,
landscaping and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the
acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and
incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the
Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility
to the Company; and
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted May 19, 2017 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the
Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling,
notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and
Page 2 of 9
(iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect
to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled,
noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on June 16, 2017 whereat all interested
persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or in writing
on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded
the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof
of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, the Planning Commission of the
City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental
Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”),
previously reviewed the Project and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”)
with respect to the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated the terms of an Agent and
D
Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), a Lease Agreement (the
“Lease Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related
Payment-in-lieu-of-Tax Agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set
forth within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold
R
interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the
Company agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing
Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the
T
term of the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of
Financial Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s)
AF
relating to one or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax
exemption for purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and
(c) a partial real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
Page 3 of 9
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
(E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning
Commission and determined the Project involves an “Unlisted Action” as said term is defined
under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the
D
Negative Declaration, related Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related
documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the
Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the
SEQRA determination made by the Planning Commission and the Authority further finds that (i)
R
the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant
damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the
environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact
T
statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This
determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship
AF
and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a
sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in
furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax
exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance
of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the
Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a
related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other
evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority
hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest
in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording
documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel
to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution
and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the
construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true
and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and
Page 4 of 9
acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts,
orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority
to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors
of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in
general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the
same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. The
foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake
the Project shall expire on June 30, 2018, unless extended by the Executive Director of the
Authority upon written application by the Company.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $5,375,000.00, which result in New York State and
local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$430,000.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
D
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
R
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
T
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
AF
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
Page 5 of 9
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A)
the Agent Agreement, wherein the Authority will appoint the Company as agent to undertake the
Project, (B) the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the
Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the
Authority, (C) the Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest
in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back
to the Company, (D) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to
make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing
Jurisdictions (along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement, or in the discretion of the
Executive Director, a sufficient guaranty of performance under the Leaseback Agreement and
PILOT Agreement), and (E) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax
Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under
the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of
D
or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken
by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project.
Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief
R
Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and
to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents,
security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by
T
these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a
maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance
AF
acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional
costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby
authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same,
all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman
and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the
execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all
events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project.
Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 6 of 9
T
AF
R
D
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
D
R
T
AF
Page 8 of 9
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
10 RIVER STREET LLC
JUNE 16, 2017 AT 10:00 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the 10 River Street LLC Project held on Friday June 16, 2017 at 10:00
a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Steven Strichman, Executive Director
Kevin O’Bryan, Chairman
Brian Carroll, Vice Chairman
Hon. Bob Doherty, Board Member
Hon. Dean Bodnar, Board Member
D
Tina Urzan, Board Member
Sue Farrell, Board Member
David Sarraf, Company Representative
Robert Ryan, Esq., Harris Beach
R
Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire
Deanna DalPos, General Public
II.
T
CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Kevin O’Bryan opened the hearing and Robert
AF
Ryan read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by 10 River Street LLC to
the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the
general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
10 RIVER STREET LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed
(collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project
(the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in
approximately 1.16 acre parcel of real property located at 2 River Street, Troy, New York 12180
along with portions of a parcel of real property located at 245 First Street, Troy, New York
12180 (collectively, the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 100.76-9-24
and a portion of TMID No. 100.84-2-2) and the existing 4.5-story building located at 2 River
Street, along with related parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the
“Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction,
rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a residential
apartment facility containing up to 80 apartment units to be leased by the Company to residential
tenants, including improvements to and replacements of roofs, interior and exterior utilities,
elevator, building systems, windows, exterior access and egress improvements, curbage, parking,
landscaping and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the
acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and
incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the
Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility
to the Company; and
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
D
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
R
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York. The Authority contemplates
providing a PILOT Agreement with a term of Twenty (20) years.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
T
AF
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $13,500,000. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 100,000.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 430,000.00
Estimated PILOT Savings = $3,593,927.00
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $ 4,123,927.00
IV. SEQRA:
For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for
purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Hon. Bob Doherty asked for clarification on the project site. Mr. Sarraf advised that
Adams Street is the nearest cross street. Ms. Urzan asked for clarification on the new entrance
and the parcel 245 1st street. Mr. Sarraf advised that the parcel is directly south of the project
site. The main entrance will be on the 1st Street side, opening up itself to the neighborhood. He
added that the entrance on River Street will remain, but only used as another form of egress. Ms.
Urzan asked about parking. Mr. Sarraf advised that only one parking lot is planned at this point.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:05 a.m.
D
R
T
AF
EXHIBIT B
SEQRA MATERIALS
D
R
T
AF
Page 9 of 9
T
AF
R
D
T
AF
R
D
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(Bow Tie Cinemas Project, BTP Monument Square, LLC)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on July 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New
York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Kevin O’Bryan
Brian Carroll
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Hon. Robert Doherty
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Adam Hotaling
Susan Farrell
Tina Urzan
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT:
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of BTP Monument Square, LLC.
On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan
Brian Carroll
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Hon. Robert Doherty
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Adam Hotaling
Susan Farrell
Tina Urzan
Page 1 of 1
Resolution No. ____
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF BTP
MONUMENT SQUARE, LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION WITH
A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii)
AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A
PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii)
DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, BTP MONUMENT SQUARE, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an
entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with
a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately 1.57 acres of real property located at One Monument Square, Troy,
New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 101.53-1-1,
101.45-5-4.1, 101.45-5-5 and 100.60-1-2) and the existing site and infrastructure improvements
located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering,
construction, and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into approximately
43,000 square feet of retail space consisting of an 8-10 screen multiplex movie theater, along
with parking improvements for approximately 100-130 vehicles, exterior access and egress
improvements, curbage, utility and related exterior improvements (collectively, the
“Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible
personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of
the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”,
and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the
“Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
Page 2 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent
Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the
Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title
to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority
leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to
which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E)
related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement
Page 3 of 3
include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are
consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation
have been complied with.
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 4 of 4
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy
Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the
foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the
Resolution contained therein, held on July 14, 2017, with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set
forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters
therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this ____ day of __________, 2017.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Page 5 of 5
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC – American Cinema Redevelopment Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on July 14, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New
York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan
Brian Carroll
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Hon. Robert Doherty
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Adam Hotaling
Susan Farrell
Tina Urzan
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT:
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of Dauchy/River Triangle, LLC.
On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Kevin O’Bryan
Brian Carroll
Hon. Dean Bodnar
Hon. Robert Doherty
Louis Anthony
Paul Carroll
Adam Hotaling
Susan Farrell
Tina Urzan
Page 1 of 1
Resolution No. ____
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF
DAUCHY/RIVER TRIANGLE, LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION
WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED BELOW); (ii)
AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND CONDUCT OF A
PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iii)
DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, DAUCHY/RIVER TRIANGLE, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an
entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with
a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately .17 acres of real property located at 285-289 River Street, Troy, New
York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.45-5-3) and the
existing building structure located thereon consisting principally of a multi-story former movie
theater (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction,
reconstruction, rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into an
modern movie theater, the upgrade and improvement of commercials space, exterior access and
egress improvements, mechanical, roof, window, utility and HVAC improvements, and parking,
curbage, signage and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the
acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and
incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the
Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility
to the Company and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
Page 2 of 2
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent
Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the
Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title
to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority
leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to
Page 3 of 3
which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E)
related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement
include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are
consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation
have been complied with.
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 4 of 4
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy
Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the
foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the
Resolution contained therein, held on July 14, 2017, with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set
forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters
therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this ____ day of __________, 2017.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Page 5 of 5
Get email alerts for Troy
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.