Troy Industrial Development Authority
Regular MeetingTroy, NY · June 28, 2019
Minutes
June 28, 2019
10:00 AM
Regular Board
Meeting Minutes
Present: Heidi Knoblauch, Steve Strichman, Hon. Anasha Cummings, Sue Farrell, Elbert Watson
and Rich Nolan
Absent: Bill Strang, Tina Urzan, Paul Carroll and Hon. Coleen Paratore
Also in attendance: MaryEllen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos, Luke Nathan and Denee Zeigler.
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m.
I. Minutes
The board reviewed the minutes from the May 29, 2019 board meeting.
Susan Farrell made a motion to approve the May 29, 2019 minutes.
Elbert Watson seconded the motion, motion carried.
II. Financials
Mary Ellen Flores went over the balance sheet with the board members and advised that
there is $953,000 in assets, $6,400 in liabilities and $946,000 in equity. She advised no
real changes. Ms. Flores advised a deficit in the amount of $6,400; almost no income and
the rest were usual expenses.
Susan Farrell made a motion to approve the financials as presented.
Elbert Watson seconded the motion, motion carried.
The chair asked for a motion to adjourn the IDA to convene as the CRC at 10:10 a.m.
Susan Farrell made a motion to adjourn the IDA and convene as the
CRC.
Elbert Watson seconded the motion, motion carried.
The board reconvened the IDA portion of the meeting at 10:24 a.m.
III. King Fuels Clean-Up
Mr. Strichman talked to the board about the King Fuels cleanup that has been mentioned
in the past and advised they are ready to seek funding for the hazardous waste cleanup
that needs to take place in order for National Grid to go in and do their remediation of the
1
site. He advised that the LDC did cleanup of non-hazardous materials and then bid out for
a cleanup of the site for the remaining hazardous materials. Mr. Strichman noted that the
received a range of bids back and are ready to move forward. He noted that the CRC
received an application from the LDC for a $100,000 grant and the IDA received a request
for funding in the amount of $300,000. Mr. Strichman noted the LDC will be paying
$100.000 and be applying to National Grid for a grant to assist with the cleanup costs.
The IDA will hold a public hearing in July regarding the cleanup. Mr. Cummings asked if
the cleanup will be completed by next year. Mr. Strichman advised the LDC’s portion of
the cleanup will be completed in about 10 weeks and then the site will be ready for
National Grid to come in and do the remediation next year. Mr. Cummings asked about
previous funds that were received in the past for the site. Mr. Strichman advised that
most of that funding was used to take down buildings on the site, some cleanup and was
funded a grant program. He added that National Grid is using their funding for the
remediation of the site.
The chair explained that all three boards will be working together within their guidelines to
fund the site cleanup in order for National Grid to complete their remediation. Mr.
Cummings asked why this board cannot fund the full amount. The chair explained that
we do not want to stretch the IDA funds to the point it could become bankrupt. Mr.
Cummings asked if there were other ideas for use of the funding. The chair advised yes.
Mr. Strichman noted that the application was circulated to the board members for review
and asked if we could vote on a resolution today to accept the application.
Susan Farrell made a motion to approve the application by the Troy LDC
for funding in the amount of $300,000 to be used towards the
hazardous material cleanup of the King Fuels site.
Hon. Anasha Cummings seconded the motion, motion carried.
IV. Old Business
Mr. Strichman noted that we are waiting to close on Rosenblum, DeFazio and the
CityStation North project.
V. Adjournment
With no new or old business to discuss, the regular board meeting was adjourned at
10:28 a.m.
Hon. Anasha Cummings made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting at
10:28 a.m.
Susan Farrell seconded the motion, motion carried.
2
Agenda
Board Members
Chair
Tina Urzan
Heidi Knoblauch
Susan Farrell
Vice Chair Elbert Watson
Paul Carroll Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Coleen Murtagh Paratore
Executive Director Bill Strang
Steven Strichman Rich Nolan Jr.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
JUNE 28, 2019
10:00 a.m.
Planning Department Conference Room
I. Approval of Minutes from the May 29, 2019 board meeting.
II. King Fuels Clean‐Up Application
III. Financials
IV. Old Business – Assistance Application Form
V. New Business
VI. Adjournment
City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180
Phone: 518.279.7166
May 29, 2019
10:00 AM
Regular Board
Meeting Minutes
Present: Heidi Knoblauch, Steve Strichman, Bill Strang, Tina Urzan, Paul Carroll, Elbert Watson,
Rich Nolan and Hon. Coleen Paratore
Absent: Hon. Anasha Cummings and Sue Farrell
Also in attendance: Justin Miller, Esq., MaryEllen Flores, Diana Cretella, Luis Gonzalez,
Matthew DeFazio, Rosemary McKenna, Deanna Dal Pos, Luke Nathan and Denee Zeigler.
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. The board took a minute to do introductions for
the new members.
I. Public Hearing – Troy Riverwalk, LLC
See attached Public Hearing Agenda
II. Public Hearing – R & M Holdings of Troy, LLC – DeFazio & Sons Inc.
See attached Public Hearing Agenda
III. Public Hearing – First Columbia 433 River Street, LLC
See attached Public Hearing Agenda
IV. Minutes
The board reviewed the minutes from the April 19, 2019 board meeting. The chair
asked that they be amended to show the job number for DeFazio’s of 30-38 FTE’s.
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the April 19, 2019 minutes.
Rich Nolan and Hon. Coleen Paratore abstained.
Bill Strang seconded the motion, motion carried.
V. Authorizing Resolution - Troy Riverwalk, LLC
Mr. Nolan asked about the improvements of the building. Mr. Rodriguez explained that
the building was essentially vacant when they started and everything will be new,
including elevators. Ms. Paratore asked about the location. Ms. Cretella advised it is
located by the Congress Street Bridge on River Street with the back on Front Street. Mr.
Nolan asked if they have heard from any other potential restaurants asking to move into
1
the space. Ms. Cretella advised no because they have been working so close with SUNY.
(See attached Resolution 05/19 #1)
Hon. Coleen Parartore made a motion to approve the Authorizing
Resolution for Troy Riverwalk, LLC.
Bill Strang seconded the motion, motion carried.
VI. Authorizing Resolution - R & M Holdings of Troy LLC - DeFazio & Sons Inc.
Rich Nolan asked if the space will accommodate them as they continue to grow. Mr.
DeFazio ensured the board that there will be enough space to include the import store,
restaurant and eventually banquet space. They would also like to become more involved
with the festivals held in Troy and include indoor/outdoor seating. (See attached
Resolution 05/19 #2)
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the Authorizing Resolution for
R&M Holdings of Troy LLC – DeFazio & Sons Inc.
Bill Strang seconded the motion, motion carried.
VII. Authorizing Resolution - First Columbia 433 River Street, LLC -
Mr. Strichman noted that 433 River Street has been a transformative project for this area
and the updates made to the sea wall and trails will help to make it even more of a
destination. (See attached Resolution 05/19 #3)
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the Authorizing Resolution for
First Columbia 433 River Street, LLC.
Elbert Watson seconded the motion, motion carried.
VIII. Financials
Mary Ellen Flores went over the balance sheet with the board members and advised that
there is $960,000 in assets, $6,000 in liabilities and $953,000 in equity. She advised that
the largest change to the income on the balance sheet is due to the PILOT late fees and
annual fees being received from projects. Ms. Flores advised a deficit in the amount of
$4,000; $3,600 in income and $7,700 in expenses under other reimbursement for
conferences attended this month.
Susan Farrell made a motion to approve the financials as presented to
the board.
Bill Strang seconded the motion, motion carried.
IX. Old Business
King Fuels - Mr. Strichman noted that a bid was sent out for the remediation of the King
Fuels site. He will have updates to present at the June meeting.
X. New Business
Meeting Date Change for June - Mr. Strichman advised that he will be out of town
during the next scheduled meeting as advised the date may have to be changed to the
28th.
2
Financial Assistance Application – The Chair advised that the application for financial
assistance has been cleaned up and made a fillable document. She advised that all of the
wording is the same.
XI. Adjournment
With no new or old business to discuss, the regular board meeting was adjourned at
11:03 a.m.
Susan Farrell made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting at 10:36 a.m.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
3
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
TROY RIVERWALK, LLC
MAY 29, 2019 AT 10:00 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the Troy Riverwalk, LLC Project held on May 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at
the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Steven Strichman, Executive Director
Heidi Knoblauch, Chair
Richard Nolan Jr., Board Member
Elbert Watson, Board Member
Hon. Coleen Paratore, Board Member
Paul Carroll, Board Member
William Strang, Board Member
Tina Urzan, Board Member
Justin Miller, Esq., Board Counsel
Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire
Denee Zeigler, Acting Secretary
Luis Gonzalez, Company Representative
Diana Cretella, Company Representative
Matt DeFazio, DeFazio’s Pizza
Rosemary McKenna, DeFazio’s Counsel
Luke Nathan, Troy Letter
Deanna Dal Pos, Realtor
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Steven Strichman opened the hearing and
Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by Troy Riverwalk, LLC to
the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the
general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
TROY RIVERWALK, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed
(collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain project
(the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in an
approximately .10 acre parcel of land located at 171 River Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the
“Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 100.60-3-8) and the existing
improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 22,500 sf of multi-story building
spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the Existing Improvements and the
planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a mixed use commercial and
residential facility containing approximately 6,000 sf of commercial space and 14 market rate
rental apartment units, all to be leased by the Company to commercial and residential tenants,
including building improvements, modifications, upgrades, and related site and exterior
improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company.
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $6,000,000.00. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 60,000.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 80,000.00
Estimated PILOT Savings = $711,749.31
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $851,749.31
IV. SEQRA:
For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for
purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Strichman advised this project will be working with SUNY Cobleskill on a culinary
kitchen. This would be a good workforce development project and will be part of the most
recent DRI Grant Application as one of the projects that will be focused on along the waterfront
between the Taylor Apartments and the Flanigan Building. Ms. Urzan asked about parking for
the project. Ms. Cretella explained that they own 14 parking spots behind the building that will
accommodate parking for the students. She added that they are still working out the details of
the culinary school. Mr. Watson asked if they had a commercial tenant yet. Ms. Cretella
advised they do not know as of right now, it will all depend on the agreement they come up with
SUNY Cobleskill. She advised that the culinary kitchen would also be available to rent to others
as a commercial kitchen, as needed. Ms. Cretella noted they do not have a firm agreement with
SUNY yet. Ms. Paratore noted that School 2 is nearby and CEO may be interested also. Mr.
Rodriguez said he would make note. Mr. Watson asked about the primary source of revenue.
Ms. Cretella explained that when the project is complete there will be 14 apartments located on
the site; most will be two bedrooms, but the upstairs apartments will be duplex/penthouses. She
added that they will be market rate apartments. Mr. Strichman explained the cost benefit
analysis for this project, which is a 12 year PILOT with the tax abatement schedule starting at
66% instead of 100%. Mr. Strichman advised that the building currently has a very low assessed
value ‘pre-project’ and when the project is complete the value will go up considerably. Ms.
Urzan asked how many people will be employed at the site. Ms. Cretella noted there will be
approximately five to start, but will go up from there based on the final project. Mr. Nolan asked
about the added value showing on the cost benefit analysis. Mr. Strichman noted it is the
difference between the current assessed value and the value of the site after the work is
completed.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
With no additional comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:24 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
R & M HOLDINGS OF TROY LLC
MAY 29, 2019 AT 10:00 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the R&M Holdings of Troy LLC Project (DeFazio & Sons Inc.) held on
May 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy,
New York 12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Steven Strichman, Executive Director
Heidi Knoblauch, Chair
Richard Nolan Jr., Board Member
Elbert Watson, Board Member
Hon. Coleen Paratore, Board Member
Paul Carroll, Board Member
William Strang, Board Member
Tina Urzan, Board Member
Justin Miller, Esq., Board Counsel
Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire
Denee Zeigler, Acting Secretary
Luis Gonzalez, Company Representative
Diana Cretella, Company Representative
Matt DeFazio, DeFazio’s Pizza
Rosemary McKenna, DeFazio’s Counsel
Luke Nathan, Troy Letter
Deanna Dal Pos, Realtor
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Steven Strichman opened the hearing and
Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by R&M Holdings of Troy
LLC Project (DeFazio & Sons Inc.) to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is
available for review and inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
R & M HOLDINGS OF TROY LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be
formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain
project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in
an approximately .20 acre parcel of land located at 214-216 Fourth Street, Troy, New York
12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.69-11-2) and the
existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 13,648 sf of building spaces
(the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the Existing Improvements and the
planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a commercial restaurant facility to
be leased by the Company to DEFAZIO & SONS INC., including building improvements,
modifications, upgrades, and related site and exterior improvements (collectively, the
“Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible
personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of
the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”,
and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the
“Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company.
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $2,000,000.00. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 18,410.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 80,000.00
Estimated PILOT Savings = $108,989.25
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $207,399.25
IV. SEQRA:
For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for
purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Strichman explained that the city has been working with the applicant on this project
for some time and they are now ready to move forward; planning and zoning has been
completed. He added that this project will have a 10 year PILOT starting at 66% abatement.
Mr. DeFazio explained that his family has owned the business for over 60 years and it has
continued to grow. He advised that there are many possibilities for them to expand. Ms.
Paratore asked about the different spaces included in the project. Mr. DeFazio described the
space to the board members and how each will be used. He advised between 30-38 FTEs. Mr.
DeFazio noted that they like to hire people in their community and are looking forward to
expanding their staff.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:32 a.m.
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FIRST COLUMBIA 433 RIVER STREET, LLC
MAY 29, 2019 AT 10:00 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the R&M Holdings of Troy LLC Project (DeFazio & Sons Inc.) held on
May 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy,
New York 12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Steven Strichman, Executive Director
Heidi Knoblauch, Chair
Richard Nolan Jr., Board Member
Elbert Watson, Board Member
Hon. Coleen Paratore, Board Member
Paul Carroll, Board Member
William Strang, Board Member
Tina Urzan, Board Member
Justin Miller, Esq., Board Counsel
Mary Ellen Flores, CFO for Hire
Denee Zeigler, Acting Secretary
Luis Gonzalez, Company Representative
Diana Cretella, Company Representative
Matt DeFazio, DeFazio’s Pizza
Rosemary McKenna, DeFazio’s Counsel
Luke Nathan, Troy Letter
Deanna Dal Pos, Realtor
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). Steven Strichman opened the hearing and
Justin Miller read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by First Columbia 433 River
Street, LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and
inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
FIRST COLUMBIA 433 RIVER STREET, LLC (the “Company”) has requested the
Authority’s assistance in connection with a certain Project (the “Project”) for the benefit of
consisting of (i) the retention by the Authority of a leasehold interest in an approximately 3.7
acre parcel of land located at 433 River Street in the City of Troy, New York (the “Land”, being
comprised of TMID Nos 101.29-1-1./1 and 101.30-6-3) and the improvements located thereon
consisting of five (5) existing buildings containing on the aggregate approximately 335,000
square feet and a surface parking lot with a capacity for approximately 300 vehicles, along with
other site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii)
the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction, on the Land and Existing
Improvements of (a) up to 20,000 square feet of additional commercial space on the 9th floor of
the Existing Improvements to accommodate a training and event facility, (b) the expansion and
renovation of the existing ground level boiler room to accommodate a brew pub/restaurant
facility and related entertainment space, and (c) building-wide upgrades to mechanical systems,
elevators, HVAC systems and interior tenant spaces (hereinafter and collectively (collectively,
the “Improvements”) for continued operation of the Existing Improvements and Improvements
as a commercial facility leased to tenants of the Company that will directly and indirectly retain
at least 930 full time jobs (the “Job Retention”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the leasing of the Facility back to the Company
pursuant to a “Straight-lease transaction”, as defined within Section 1951(12) of the Act.
The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; and (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $9,740,634.00. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 110,000.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 402,979.00
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $ 512,979.00
IV. SEQRA:
For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for
purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Strichman explained that the initial project was based on job retention, but this
addition will help with job creation. Mr. Miller talked about the history of the project which was
started in the early 2000’s and has continued to grow and change over the years. He advised that
the IDA extended their PILOT in 2016 with the understanding that the project will expand. Mr.
Miller noted that they came to us to extend sales tax benefits due to an expansion of their project.
He added that they are also asking for mortgage recording tax exemption. Mr. Strichman
advised that this project is also tied to the hotel project next door. Mr. Nolan asked if they aim to
bring a more commercial aspect to the space. Mr. Strichman advised yes. He added that new
tenants will be moving into two nearby residential projects; The Lofts at 444 and Kings
Commons.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at 10:40 a.m.
PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(Troy Riverwalk, LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on May 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York
12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Heidi Knoblauch X
Richard Nolan X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Elbert Watson X
Coleen Paratore X
Paul Carroll X
William Strang X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Justin Miller, Esq.,
Mary Ellen Flores, Luke Nathan, Matt DeFazio, Rosemary McKenna, Luis Gonzales,
Diana Cretella, Deanna Dal Pos and Denee Zeigler.
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of Troy Riverwalk, LLC for itself or an entity to be formed.
On motion duly made by Coleen Paratore and seconded by William Strang, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Heidi Knoblauch X
Richard Nolan X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Elbert Watson X
Coleen Paratore X
Paul Carroll X
William Strang X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 9
Resolution No. 06/19 #1
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A
CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT
OF TROY RIVERWALK, LLC (THE “COMPANY”); (ii) ADOPTING
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
REVIEW ACT (“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv)
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN
DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, TROY RIVERWALK, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be
formed (collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain
project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in
an approximately .10 acre parcel of land located at 171 River Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the
“Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 100.60-3-8) and the existing
improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 22,500 sf of multi-story building
spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the Existing Improvements and the
planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a mixed use commercial and
residential facility containing approximately 6,000 sf of commercial space and 14 market rate
rental apartment units, all to be leased by the Company to commercial and residential tenants,
including building improvements, modifications, upgrades, and related site and exterior
improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted March 22, 2019 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the
Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling,
notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and
(iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect
to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and
Page 2 of 9
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled,
noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on May __, 2019 whereat all interested
persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or in writing
on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded
the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof
of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, the Planning Commission of the
City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental
Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”),
previously reviewed the Project and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”)
with respect to the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated the terms of an Agent and
Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), a Lease Agreement (the
“Lease Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related
Payment-in-lieu-of-Tax Agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set
forth within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold
interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the
Company agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing
Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the
term of the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of
Financial Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating
to one or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption
for purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a
partial real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
Page 3 of 9
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
(E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning
Commission and determined the Project involves an “Unlisted Action” as said term is defined
under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the
Negative Declaration, related Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related
documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the
Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the
SEQRA determination made by the Planning Commission and the Authority further finds that (i)
the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant
damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the
environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact
statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This
determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship
and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a
sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in
furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax
exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance
of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the
Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a
related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other
evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority
hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest
in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording
documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel
to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution
and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the
construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true
and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and
acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts,
orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority
to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors
of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in
Page 4 of 9
general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the
same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. The
foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake
the Project shall expire on December 31, 2020, unless extended by the Executive Director of the
Authority upon written application by the Company.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $1,000,000.00, which result in New York State and
local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$80,000.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Page 5 of 9
Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A)
the Agent Agreement, wherein the Authority will appoint the Company as agent to undertake the
Project, (B) the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the
Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the
Authority, (C) the Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest
in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back
to the Company, (D) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to
make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing
Jurisdictions (along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement, or in the discretion of the
Executive Director, a sufficient guaranty of performance under the Leaseback Agreement and
PILOT Agreement), and (E) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax
Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under
the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of
or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken
by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project.
Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief
Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and
to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents,
security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by
these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a
maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance
acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional
costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby
authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same,
all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman
and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the
execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all
events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project.
Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 6 of 9
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, Denee Zeigler, the undersigned, Acting Secretary of the Troy Industrial Development
Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing extract of the
minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the Resolution contained
therein, held on May 29, 2019, with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is
a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set forth therein and of the whole
of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this 29th day of May, 2019.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Page 7 of 9
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Page 8 of 9
EXHIBIT B
SEQRA MATERIALS
Page 9 of 9
PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(R & M Holdings of Troy LLC Project – DeFazio & Sons Inc.)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on May 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York
12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Heidi Knoblauch X
Richard Nolan X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Elbert Watson X
Coleen Paratore X
Paul Carroll X
William Strang X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Justin Miller, Esq.,
Mary Ellen Flores, Luke Nathan, Matt DeFazio, Rosemary McKenna, Luis Gonzales,
Diana Cretella, Deanna Dal Pos and Denee Zeigler.
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of R & M Holdings of Troy LLC for itself or an entity to be
formed.
On motion duly made by Hon. Coleen Paratore and seconded by Bill Strang, the
following resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development
Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Heidi Knoblauch X
Richard Nolan X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Elbert Watson X
Coleen Paratore X
Paul Carroll X
William Strang X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 9
Resolution No. 06/19 #2
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A
CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT
OF R & M HOLDINGS OF TROY LLC (THE “COMPANY”); (ii) ADOPTING
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
REVIEW ACT (“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT; AND (iv)
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN
DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, R & M HOLDINGS OF TROY LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an
entity to be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with
a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in an approximately .20 acre parcel of land located at 214-216 Fourth Street, Troy, New
York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.69-11-2) and the
existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 13,648 sf of building spaces
(the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the Existing Improvements and the
planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a commercial restaurant facility to
be leased by the Company to DEFAZIO & SONS INC., including building improvements,
modifications, upgrades, and related site and exterior improvements (collectively, the
“Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible
personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of
the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”,
and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the
“Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted April 19, 2019 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the
Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling,
notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and
(iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect
to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled,
noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on May 24, 2019 whereat all interested
persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or in writing
on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded
Page 2 of 9
the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof
of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, the Planning Commission of the
City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental
Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”),
previously reviewed the Project and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”)
with respect to the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated the terms of an Agent and
Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), a Lease Agreement (the
“Lease Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”) and related
Payment-in-lieu-of-Tax Agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), and, subject to the conditions set
forth within this resolution, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) acquire a leasehold
interest in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement, (ii) appoint the
Company agent of the Authority to undertake the Project and lease the Land, Existing
Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the Company for the
term of the Leaseback Agreement and PILOT Agreement, and (ii) provide certain forms of
Financial Assistance to the Company, including (a) mortgage recording tax exemption(s) relating
to one or more financings secured in furtherance of the Project; (b) a sales and use tax exemption
for purchases and rentals related to the construction and equipping of the Project; and (c) a
partial real property tax abatement structured through the PILOT Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
Page 3 of 9
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
(E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning
Commission and determined the Project involves an “Unlisted Action” as said term is defined
under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the
Negative Declaration, related Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related
documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the
Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the
SEQRA determination made by the Planning Commission and the Authority further finds that (i)
the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant
damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the
environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact
statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This
determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship
and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a
sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in
furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording tax
exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in furtherance
of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied against the
Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Leaseback Agreement and/or a
related Agent Agreement, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other
evidence of liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority
hereby authorizes the undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest
in the Land and Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording
documents, the form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel
to the Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution
and delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the
construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true
and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and
acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts,
orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority
to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors
of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in
general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the
same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. The
foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake
the Project shall expire on December 31, 2020, unless extended by the Executive Director of the
Authority upon written application by the Company.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $1,000,000.00, which result in New York State and
Page 4 of 9
local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$80,000.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver (A)
the Agent Agreement, wherein the Authority will appoint the Company as agent to undertake the
Project, (B) the Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company will lease its interest in the
Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility to the
Authority, (C) the Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest
in the Land, Existing Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back
to the Company, (D) the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to
make certain PILOT Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing
Jurisdictions (along with a related PILOT Mortgage Agreement, or in the discretion of the
Executive Director, a sufficient guaranty of performance under the Leaseback Agreement and
PILOT Agreement), and (E) related documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax
Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and related instruments; provided the rental payments under
Page 5 of 9
the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of
or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken
by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project.
Section 5. The Chairman, Vice Chairman and/or the Executive Director/Chief
Executive Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and
to the extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents,
security agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by
these resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a
maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance
acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional
costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby
authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same,
all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman
and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the
execution thereof by the Chairman, Vice Chairman or the Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all
events, recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project.
Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 6 of 9
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, Denee Zeigler, the undersigned, Acting Secretary of the Troy Industrial Development
Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing extract of the
minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the Resolution contained
therein, held on May 29, 2019, with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is
a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set forth therein and of the whole
of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this 29th day of May, 2019.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Page 7 of 9
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Page 8 of 9
EXHIBIT B
SEQRA MATERIALS
Page 9 of 9
PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(First Columbia 433 River Street, LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on May 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York
12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Heidi Knoblauch X
Richard Nolan X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Elbert Watson X
Coleen Paratore X
Paul Carroll X
William Strang X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Justin Miller, Esq.,
Mary Ellen Flores, Luke Nathan, Matt DeFazio, Rosemary McKenna, Luis Gonzales,
Diana Cretella, Deanna Dal Pos and Denee Zeigler.
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of First Columbia 433 River Street, LLC for itself or an entity to
be formed.
On motion duly made by Tina Urzan and seconded by Bill Strang, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Heidi Knoblauch X
Richard Nolan X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Elbert Watson X
Coleen Paratore X
Paul Carroll X
William Strang X
Susan Farrell X
Tina Urzan X
Page 1 of 10
Resolution No. 06/19 #3
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) AUTHORIZING THE UNDERTAKING OF A
CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT
OF FIRST COLUMBIA 433 RIVER STREET, LLC (THE “COMPANY”); (ii)
ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY REVIEW ACT (“SEQRA”) WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT;
AND (iv) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN
DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a certain resolution adopted by the Authority on September 23,
2016, as supplemented by Authority resolution adopted on October 27, 2018 (collectively, the
“Project Authorizing Resolution”), the Authority authorized the undertaking of a certain Project
(the “Project”) for the benefit of FIRST COLUMBIA 433 RIVER STREET, LLC (the
“Company”) consisting of (i) the retention by the Authority of a leasehold interest in an
approximately 3.7 acre parcel of land located at 433 River Street in the City of Troy, New York
(the “Land”, being comprised of TMID Nos 101.29-1-1./1 and 101.30-6-3) and the
improvements located thereon consisting of five (5) existing buildings containing on the
aggregate approximately 335,000 square feet and a surface parking lot with a capacity for
approximately 300 vehicles, along with other site and infrastructure improvements located
thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction,
reconstruction, on the Land and Existing Improvements of up to 20,000 square feet of additional
commercial space on the 9th floor of the Existing Improvements (collectively, the
“Improvements”) for continued operation of the Existing Improvements and Improvements as a
commercial facility leased to tenants of the Company that will directly and indirectly retain at
least 930 full time jobs (the “Job Retention”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the leasing of the Facility back to the Company a new
“Straight-lease transaction”, as defined within Section 1951(12) of the Act, whereby the
Authority and Company will enter into a Lease Agreement, Leaseback Agreement and related
Page 2 of 10
Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement (“PILOT Agreement”) to be negotiated (collectively, the
“Restructuring”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Project Authorizing Resolution and in furtherance of the
Project, the Authority and Company entered into various documents and agreements
(collectively, the “Project Documents”), including, but not limited to: (i) a certain Agent and
Financial Assistance and Project Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2016 (the “Agent
Agreement”), (ii) a certain Leaseback Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2016 (the “Leaseback
Agreement”), and (iii) a certain Amended and Restated Payment in Lieu of Tax Agreement,
dated as of October 27, 2016 (the “PILOT Agreement”), each as amended pursuant to a certain
Omnibus Amendment Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2018; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Project Authorizing Resolution and Project Documents, the
Company is required to complete the Improvements on or before December 31, 2019, however,
the Company has submitted a supplemental application (the “Application”) to the Authority
outlining an expanded scope of improvements to be undertaken by the Company on or before
December 31, 2020 and requesting the Authority’s approval of additional Financial Assistance
(as defined herein) relating to same; and
WHEREAS, the Application requests the proposed Improvements to be redefined to
include: the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction, on the Land and Existing
Improvements of (a) up to 20,000 square feet of additional commercial space on the 9th floor of
the Existing Improvements to accommodate a training and event facility, (b) the expansion and
renovation of the existing ground level boiler room to accommodate a brew pub/restaurant
facility and related entertainment space, and (c) building-wide upgrades to mechanical systems,
elevators, HVAC systems and interior tenant spaces (hereinafter and collectively, the “Updated
Improvements”); and
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted April 19, 2019 (the “Initial Project Resolution”), the
Authority (i) accepted the Application submitted by the Company, (ii) authorized the scheduling,
notice and conduct of a public hearing with respect to the Project (the “Public Hearing”), and
(iii) described the forms of financial assistance being contemplated by the Authority with respect
to the Project (the “Financial Assistance”, as more fully described herein); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Initial Project Resolution, the Authority duly scheduled,
noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on May 24, 2019 whereat all interested
persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or in writing
on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be afforded
the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public Hearing, proof
of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to application by the Company, the Planning Commission of the
City of Troy (the “Planning Commission”), as lead agency pursuant to the State Environmental
Quality Review Act and regulations adopted pursuant thereto (collectively, “SEQRA”),
previously reviewed the Project and adopted a negative declaration (the “Negative Declaration”)
with respect to the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
Page 3 of 10
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to amend the Project Documents and definition of
“Project” to read as follows: a certain Project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the retention by the
Authority of a leasehold interest in an approximately 3.7 acre parcel of land located at 433 River
Street in the City of Troy, New York (the “Land”, being comprised of TMID Nos 101.29-1-1./1
and 101.30-6-3) and the improvements located thereon consisting of five (5) existing buildings
containing on the aggregate approximately 335,000 square feet and a surface parking lot with a
capacity for approximately 300 vehicles, along with other site and infrastructure improvements
located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering,
construction, reconstruction, on the Land and Existing Improvements of (a) up to 20,000 square
feet of additional commercial space on the 9th floor of the Existing Improvements to
accommodate a training and event facility, (b) the expansion and renovation of the existing
ground level boiler room to accommodate a brew pub/restaurant facility and related
entertainment space, and (c) building-wide upgrades to mechanical systems, elevators, HVAC
systems and interior tenant spaces (hereinafter and collectively (collectively, the
“Improvements”) for continued operation of the Existing Improvements and Improvements as a
commercial facility leased to tenants of the Company that will directly and indirectly retain at
least 930 full time jobs (the “Job Retention”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the leasing of the Facility back to the Company
pursuant to a “Straight-lease transaction”, as defined within Section 1951(12) of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Company have negotiated the terms of certain
amendments to the Project Documents and the Authority desires to provide financial assistance
(the “Financial Assistance”) to the Company in connection with the Improvements the form of
(i) sales and use tax exemptions with respect to the Improvements and the Equipment; and (ii)
mortgage recording tax exemption(s) related to the Company’s financing of the Improvements
and Equipment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
Page 4 of 10
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
(E) The Authority has reviewed the Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning
Commission and determined the Project involves an “Unlisted Action” as said term is defined
under SEQRA. The review is uncoordinated. Based upon the review by the Authority of the
Negative Declaration, related Environmental Assessment Form (the “EAF”) and related
documents delivered by the Company to the Authority and other representations made by the
Company to the Authority in connection with the Project, the Authority hereby ratifies the
SEQRA determination made by the Planning Commission and the Authority further finds that (i)
the Project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant
damage to the environment; (ii) the Project will not have a “significant effect on the
environment” as such quoted terms are defined in SEQRA; and (iii) no “environmental impact
statement” as such quoted term is defined in SEQRA, need be prepared for this action. This
determination constitutes a negative declaration in connection with the Authority’s sponsorship
and involvement with the Project for purposes of SEQRA.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) a
sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured in
furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; and (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing amendments to the Project Documents,
along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other evidence of liability
insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority hereby authorizes the
undertaking of the Project, including the acquisition of a leasehold interest in the Land and
Existing Improvements pursuant to the Lease Agreement and related recording documents, the
form and substance of which shall be approved as to form and content by counsel to the
Authority. Subject to the within conditions, the Authority further authorizes the execution and
delivery of the Leaseback Agreement, wherein the Company is authorized to undertake the
construction and equipping of the Improvements and hereby appoints the Company as the true
and lawful agent of the Authority: (i) to acquire, construct and equip the Improvements and
Page 5 of 10
acquire and install the Equipment; (ii) to make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any contracts,
orders, receipts, writings and instructions, as the stated agent for the Authority with the authority
to delegate such agency, in whole or in part, to agents, subagents, contractors, and subcontractors
of such agents and subagents and to such other parties as the Company chooses; and (iii) in
general, to do all things which may be requisite or proper for completing the Project, all with the
same powers and the same validity that the Authority could do if acting in its own behalf. The
foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake
the Project shall expire on December 31, 2020, unless extended by the Executive Director of the
Authority upon written application by the Company.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $5,037,237.50, which result in New York State and
local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$402,979.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
Page 6 of 10
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Section 4. The Chair, Vice Chair, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer
of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, and deliver
amendments to the Project Documents, including (A) the Agent Agreement, wherein the
Authority will appoint the Company as agent to undertake the Project, (B) the Leaseback
Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority will lease its interest in the Land, Existing
Improvements, Improvements and Equipment constituting the Facility back to the Company, (C)
the PILOT Agreement pursuant to which the Company shall be required to make certain PILOT
Payments to the Authority for the benefit of the Affected Taxing Jurisdictions, and (D) related
documents, including, but not limited to, Sales Tax Exemption Letter(s), Bills(s) of Sale and
related instruments; provided the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement include
payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project.
Section 5. The Chair, Vice Chair and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby further authorized, on behalf of the Authority, and to the
extent necessary, to execute and deliver any mortgage, assignment of leases and rents, security
agreement, UCC-1 Financing Statements and all documents reasonably contemplated by these
resolutions or required by any lender identified by the Company (the “Lender”) up to a
maximum principal amount necessary to undertake the Project and/or finance/refinance
acquisition and Project costs, equipment and other personal property and related transactional
costs, and, where appropriate, the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Authority is hereby
authorized to affix the seal of the Authority to the Authority Documents and to attest the same,
all with such changes, variations, omissions and insertions as the Chairman, Vice Chairman
and/or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Authority shall approve, the
execution thereof by the Chair, Vice Chair or the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of
the Authority to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval; provided, in all events,
recourse against the Authority is limited to the Authority’s interest in the Project.
Section 6. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 7. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 7 of 10
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, Denee Zeigler, the undersigned, Acting Secretary of the Troy Industrial Development
Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing extract of the
minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the Resolution contained
therein, held on May 29, 2019, with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is
a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set forth therein and of the whole
of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this 29th day of May, 2019.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Page 8 of 10
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Page 9 of 10
EXHIBIT B
SEQRA MATERIALS
Page 10 of 10
Get email alerts for Troy
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.