Troy Industrial Development Authority
Regular MeetingTroy, NY · July 17, 2020
Minutes
July 17, 2020
10:00 AM
IDA Board Meeting
This meeting was held via Zoom Meeting
Present: Justin Nadeau, Rich Nolan (joined at 11:05 a.m.), Susan Farrell, Tina Urzan, Hon.
Anasha Cummings, Stephanie Fitch and Elbert Watson.
Absent: Hon. Jim Gulli
Also in attendance: Steven Strichman, Justin Miller Esq., Mary Ellen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos,
Tom Rossi, Donald LaRosa, Glen Lunde, Charlotte O’Connor, Jesse Batus, Dylan Turek, L Lewis,
Bernie Doyle and Cheryl Kennedy.
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Mr. Strichman noted that this meeting is being
held via conference call and online due to the Governor’s Executive Order No. 202.1.
I. Minutes
The board reviewed the June 19, 2020 meeting.
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 19,
2020 regular board meeting.
Justin Nadeau abstained.
Hon. Anasha Cummings seconded the motion.
Motion carried. 5 Aye 0 Nay 1 Abstained 2 Absent
II. 701 River Street, LLC – Public Hearing (10:02 a.m.)
Susan Farrell made a motion to close the public hearing for 701
River Street, LLC.
Justin Nadeau abstained.
Stephanie Fitch seconded the motion.
Motion carried. 5 Aye 0 Nay 1 Abstained 2 Absent
(See attached Public Hearing Agenda)
III. 701 River Street, LLC – Supplemental Project Authorization
No discussion from the board members or public.
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the Supplemental Project
Authorization for 701 River Street, LLC.
Justin Nadeau abstained.
Susan Farrell seconded the motion.
1
Motion carried. 5 Aye 0 Nay 1 Abstained 2 Absent
(See attached Resolution 07/20 #1)
IV. Troy Riverwalk, LLC – Public Hearing (10:12 a.m.)
Tina Urzan made a motion to close the public hearing for Troy
Riverwalk, LLC at 10:16.
Justin Nadeau abstained.
Hon. Anasha Cummings seconded the motion.
Motion carried. 5 Aye 0 Nay 1 Abstained 2 Absent
(See Attached Public Hearing Agenda)
V. Troy Riverwalk, LLC – Supplemental Project Authorization
The board had a discussion about the modification about the status of the commercial
space. Mr. Strichman explained there is some uncertainty about who will be going into
the space. Mr. Watson asked if the financing was contingent on the commercial space
and if there was a liquidity issue with the project. Mr. Lunde from CPC explained that
they do have liquidity, but with the original PILOT increased did not align with their
projected rent increases. He advised that the best solution was to extend the PILOT. Mr.
Watson asked about the developer’s financial background. Mr. Lunde advised nothing
derogatory; credit in good shape. Ms. Fitch thanked Mr. Watson for bringing up those
points; it helped to get a clearer picture. Mr. Watson wanted to make sure it benefited
the community. Mr. Strichman explained this will help to get a property back on the tax
roll, new commercial space and new residents. He added that the way the building is
now, it is a blight on that portion of the downtown. Mr. Strichman discussed some
background on how the PILOT terms are worked out.
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the supplemental Project
Authorization for Troy Riverwalk, LLC.
Justin Nadeau abstained.
Susan Farrell seconded the motion, motion carried.
Motion carried. 5 Aye 0 Nay 1 Abstained 2 Absent
(See attached Resolution 07/20 #2)
VI. Poestenkill Place, LLC – Initial Project Resolution
Mr. Strichman spoke to board about the project located in South Troy in the former Irish
Mist property. He noted that this aligns with the comprehensive plan to bring housing to
that area of Troy. Mr. Batus presented to the board a full project outline and a discussion
about the type of projects Community Builders likes to take on. He noted that they have
worked on housing at Monument Square and Tapestry on the Hudson. Mr. Batus
explained that this current project will be 81 units of rental housing and hopes it
encourages new residential growth in that area. Mr. Watson asked if these are Section 8
apartments. Mr. Batus advised they are not considered Section 8 they are regulated
through the low income tax credit program which sets a max rent can be. Mr. Cummings
clarified that Section 8 can apply to live there, but it is not the criteria to live there. Mr.
Batus explained they recently chose a developer and will be closing on the site in October.
He advised they are moving into the design construction of the plan and spoke about the
challenges of being located in a flood plain. Mr. Batus noted that the ground floor will be
parking to allow for water to come in out in the event of flooding. He advised the site is
very contaminated and have been working with the NYS DEC to do site cleanup. They will
also receive tax credits because of this. He explained that an applications for financing
have been sent out and they are waiting to hear back. They hope to be ready for a closing
2
at the end of 2020. Mr. Batus advised they are asking for a PILOT and sales tax and
mortgage recording tax exemption. He also discussed the community benefits. Mr.
Watson asked how much they were financing. Mr. Batus explained that they are using an
As of Right Tax Credit program through HCR along with the DEC credit, the rest will be
financing through different agencies. Mr. Watson asked about the apartment sizes and
specifically the low number of 3 bedrooms. Mr. Batus explained that they number of
bedrooms are based on the layout and how it scores with NYS. Mr. Cummings
commented about the amount of funding going into a large scale, concentrated housing
project in an area that could benefit from $34 Million dollars of funding. Mr. Batus a lot of
the cost comes from cleaning up of the contamination and dealing with the flood issues.
He also commented on the concentration of housing guidelines from HUD; they are not
against building larger but they do not want low income only people concentrated in a
large scale apartment project. Mr. Batus stressed that they are working to make this
property green, eco-friendly and reduce the carbon footprint. Ms. Fitch talked about how
a building of that size would change the walkable feeling of the property. Mr. Batus
advised that they had discussions about this during the planning stage of the project and
have included outdoor seating and other streetscaping. Mr. Watson asked how many
floors the building would be. Mr. Batus advised four floors. Mr. Urzan asked about what
is included in the rent. Mr. Batus advised nothing additional is included, it is all factored
into the rents. Mr. Cummings asked about the people that are currently employed at the
factory located on the site; Siewert Equipment. Mr. Strichman noted that there are about
15 employees. They tried to find a new location for them and were unsuccessful. Mr.
Cummings noted that we will lose 15 jobs from the existing business and only get 4 from
this project. He was concerned that the project did not match the plan of creating a
strong neighborhood community with businesses close by for employment. Mr. Strichman
noted that it is on the bus line and there is a lot of interest of developing the waterfront to
create jobs. Mr. Batus noted that many times bringing in state funding acts as a catalyst
for development for private investors. He added that they work closely with community
groups such as the Boys and Girls Club and Unity House. Mr. Strichman noted that this is
just the initial resolution and they have a lot of negotiating to do. Mr. Batus is open to
discussions and would like this project to work for the city. Ms. Urzan asked about the
number of employees. Mr. Batus advised four onsite. Ms. Fitch was concerned the
project was going onto a contaminated site that is also a flood zone. Mr. Cummings asked
about how the per unit revenue. Mr. Miller explained that making sure that the PILOT
structure works for the city is part of the negotiations. Mr. Batus advised $600 per unit
per year. Mr. Cummings advised that is a big comparison to the surrounding landlords
and is concerned with the value of the project to the neighborhood and city. Mr. Nadeau
stressed this is just the beginning of the discussion. Mr. Watson asked about the 3%
management fee. Mr. Batus explained that they are not for profit, but have a small
amount coming in that goes right back into the overhead costs and future investments.
Ms. Urzan also noted that it would be nice to see lower rents. Mr. Strichman explained
that would also increase the PILOT. Mr. Batus explained that the rent structure is not
building in stone, but they do like to see a mix of incomes living together. Mr. Strichman
agreed that they are looking for a greater mix of market rate apartments at the site.
Mr. Batus asked about the steps moving forward in the event this resolution is denied.
Mr. Miller spoke about the application process. He noted that generally that application is
approved and then the details are worked out in future conversations. Mr. Miller
explained that we can table the project and gather additional details in the coming
months. Mr. Cummings asked what the difference between tabling and continuing the
vote. Mr. Miller noted that tabling it would keep discussion open with the developer. Ms.
Farrell agreed that tabling is a better idea and it would give Mr. Nolan a better chance to
review the project. Mr. Watson asked what additional information will be presented if
3
tabled. Mr. Miller explained that we may be able to work towards getting more details
together for the next meeting. Mr. Batus advised that he understood that this part of the
process was to only to approve the application and get the discussion started. Mr.
Strichman agreed that there is not much else that can be added if this is tabled, it may be
better to vote and move forward.
Elbert Watson made a motion to approve the Initial Project Resolution
for Poestenkill Place, LLC.
Stephanie Fitch seconded the motion.
Hon. Anasha Cummings, Tina Urzan and Susan Farrell opposed.
Rich Nolan and Justin Nadeau abstained from the vote.
Motion denied. 2 Aye 3 Nay 2 Abstained 1 Absent
VII. Executive Directors Report
Expenditures - Mr. Strichman advised there are three expenditures that have come up in
which he would like to cover. He advised that $625 is requested to register Denee Zeigler
for economic development training, Mary Ellen Flores requires reimbursement for her
purchase of a newer version of QuickBooks to replace ours that crashed and he would like
to approve up to $2,000 for laptops in case we need to go remote in the future.
City Station North – Mr. Strichman noted they are still delayed at this point, but plan on
moving forward. They have experienced several delays due to COVID.
VIII. Financials
Ms. Flores presented the statement of net position to the board. She advised that as of
June 30, 2020, the total assets stand at $735,000 with $502,000 in cash. The liabilities
stand at $61,000 leaving a fund balance of $674,000. No real changes. Ms. Fitch asked
about the column labeled budget. Ms. Flores advised it is the annual budget and is on the
statement of activity.
Ms. Flores presented the statement of activity and explained that for the month of June
there is a $1,000 deficit. Revenue came from interest income. Ms. Flores advised
expenses for the month were $1,200; no out of the ordinary expenses. Mr. Watson asked
if there is an aging report available for the payables and receivables on the balance sheet.
She advised that typically she does not include that in the financials, but advised that the
majority of the receivables are PILOTs that have not yet been paid. She added that they
are paid back to the city. Mr. Nadeau asked if those receivables are past due. Ms. Flores
advised yes, they were due 2/1. She added that the city is aware. Ms. Farrell asked if
there was any state moratorium on taxes. Mr. Miller advised no, the city does not
maintain the contracts. He asked if they are over 60 days a letter should be sent out to
them. Ms. Flores will send him the projects that fall into that category.
Susan Farrell made a motion to approve the financials as presented and
send out notices to projects 60 days overdue.
Elbert Watson seconded the motion.
Motion carried. 6 Aye 0 Nay 1 Abstained 1 Absent
IX. Adjournment
With no additional business to discuss, the regular board meeting was adjourned at 11:30
a.m.
4
Hon. Anasha Cummings made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting at
11:30 a.m.
Stephanie Fitch seconded the motion.
Motion carried. 6 Aye 0 Nay 1 Abstained 1 Absent
5
Agenda
Board Members
Chair
Tina Urzan
Justin Nadeau
Susan Farrell
Vice Chair Elbert Watson
Rich Nolan BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
JULY 17, 2020
Executive Director Stephanie Fitch
Steven Strichman 10:00 a.m.
Link to Join Zoom Meeting
Meeting ID: 970 3909 7419
Password: 159433
I. Approval of Minutes from the June 19, 2020 board meetings.
II. Public Hearing
• 701 River Street, LLC
• Troy Riverwalk, LLC
III. Supplemental Project Authorization
• 701 River Street, LLC
• Troy Riverwalk, LLC
IV. Initial Project Resolution
• Poestenkill Place
V. Executive Director’s Report
VI. Financials
VII. Old Business
VIII. New Business
IX. Adjournment
City Hall – 433 River Street, Suite 5001, Troy, New York 12180
Back to Agenda
Phone: 518.279.7166
June 19, 2020
10:00 AM
IDA Board Meeting
This meeting was held via Zoom Meeting
Present: Justin Nadeau, Steve Strichman, Rich Nolan, Susan Farrell, Tina Urzan, Hon. Anasha
Cummings, Stephanie Fitch, Elbert Watson and Hon. Jim Gulli.
Absent:
Also in attendance: Justin Miller Esq., Mary Ellen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos, Tom Rossi, Donald
LaRosa, Glen Lunde, Bernie Doyle and Cheryl Kennedy.
D
The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. Mr. Strichman noted that this meeting is being
held via conference call and online due to the Governor’s Executive Order No. 202.1.
R
Justin Nadeau introduced himself to the board is looking forward to working with everyone.
I. Minutes
T
The board reviewed the January 17, 2020 meeting. There is a quorum of members
present at that meeting.
AF
Rich Nolan made a motion to approve the minutes of the January
17, 2020 regular board meeting.
Sue Farrell seconded the motion, motion carried.
The board reviewed the March 20, 2020 meeting. There is a quorum of members
present at that meeting.
Hon. Anasha Cummings made a motion to approve the minutes of
the March 20, 2020 regular board meeting.
Stephanie Fitch seconded the motion, motion carried.
II. 701 River Street, LLC – Initial Project Resolution
Mr. Strichman spoke to the board about the previously approved project which had
suffered from fire damage last year as the project was nearing completion. The
applicant is in need of additional sales tax exemptions for purchases needed as a
result of the fire. Mr. Strichman noted that the project is an 80 unit building with
1,300 sqft of commercial space. He advised that they are also asking for additional
funding in the amount of $250,000 to assist with insurance payment delays. Mr.
Strichman noted that this is an initial project resolution and we will discuss the
details again next month. He explained that we do have the funding available. He
suggested using the additional funding towards project costs and amending the
1
Back to Agenda
lease by the like amount. When the project closes and financing is in place, the
lease purchase option will be increased to offset the additional project expenses.
Mr. Nolan asked about the projected job offerings coming from a restaurant and
questioned if a restaurant was still planning on going into that space given the
current situation. Mr. Rossi advised as of now there is nobody planned to occupy
the space until the building is completed. He added that the space is large enough
for two possible food spaces. Mr. Miller gave some additional background on the
issues that the fire caused the project. He advised that the request in front of the
board is for additional sales tax exemptions and changes to the project cost. Mr.
Miller noted that a public hearing will be held in July. He also noted that the IDA
has the capability to assist the project through the construction phase. He also
clarified that they own the building outright, but the IDA owns the parking lot
behind it. We will recoup the expenditure through the purchase of that land. Mr.
Watson asked for some background on the project. Mr. Miller explained that this
project takes place in the formerly vacant Marshall Ray building that the city ended
up taking for taxes. He explained that the property was purchased from the city
foreclosure list, but that project did not work out. It was then transferred a few
more times and ended with Redburn. In the meantime, this board acquired the
land behind the building that stretches to the river. He explained that the IDA has
a history of working on this project which is also adjacent to the Ingalls Ave Boat
Launch. He advised that the existing development team would work on the
D
building and the IDA would sell them the adjacent parking lot. It closed at the end
of 2018 and they began working on the building right away until the fire in July
2019. Mr. Rossi added that we were about 70%-80% complete at the time of the
fire. Mr. Watson asked if there were issues with the insurance company. Mr. Rossi
R
explained that they have already received a very large portion from the insurance
company and additional funds are expected. Mr. Rossi noted that they have a new
contractor and many of the subcontractors have come back. Ms. Fitch explained
that the cash flow and additional sales tax make sense, but asked if the
T
employment numbers should be adjusted to reflect a more accurate number. Mr.
AF
Rossi agreed and especially now during COVID. Mr. Strichman noted that we do
need to monitor job numbers each year and we can revisit that section. Mr.
Cummings added that the total amount of 17 shown on the resolution would be a
good number to keep as a target for over the next few years. Mr. Nolan added
that the business type may not want to be so specific at this point. Mr. Rossi
agreed and explained that there are three potential commercial spaces in the
building that could be used. He added that they had plans pre COVID and fire, but
are now re-evaluating some of them. Mr. Cummings asked about the funding
portion of the agreement and wanted to make sure that the value of the lot is
enough to balance out the request. Mr. Strichman noted that the project financing
is tied to the parking lot portion. Mr. Rossi advised that the agreement was to
keep the bike path and noted that the ground lease is will be clearly connected.
Mr. Watson asked if the parking lot will be needed for the tenants. Mr. Gulli asked
if there was a specific date that the lot had to be purchased or is it an ongoing
lease. Mr. Strichman advised the limit is five years, but he would like to tie the
lease agreement to the permanent financing. Mr. Cummings asked if the parking
was required by the planning commission. Mr. Strichman noted that the project did
review the project for parking requirements. Mr. Rossi explained that at this time
we are just leasing it, but intend on buying out the lease and keep a portion to be
used as the bike trail. Mr. Miller noted that they have a mandatory option to
purchase and if that was not in place, we would own the parking lot. Their lenders
would rather not see that happen. He noted that the amended lease amounts
would allow us to recoup our investment.
2
Back to Agenda
Susan Farrell made a motion to approve the Initial Project
Resolution for 701 River Street, LLC.
Stephanie Fitch seconded the motion, motion carried.
III. Troy Riverwalk, LLC – Initial Project Resolution
Mr. Strichman explained that this initial resolution is for another project that was
previously approved. Initially, the project was going to have 14 apartments and now that
number has changed to 18 due to financing issues. Mr. Strichman introduced Glen Lunde
of Community Preservation Corporation to discuss the reason for the changes. Mr. Lunde
spoke to the board about the permanent financing for this project and explained that CPC
is not a bank, they are a community development foundation. Mr. Lunde explained when
there is a PILOT on the loan application; they require a longer amount of time with a
more gradual step up. He explained without the adjustments the project would not have
received the financing. Increasing the number of units will help to make this project more
viable to the lenders. Mr. Watson asked if it is affordable housing. Mr. Lunde explained
that they will be market rate housing and added that it is a project that takes a vacant
building and puts it back into use. Mr. Watson asked what SONYMA’s debt service
requirement is. Mr. Lunde advised 1.10:1; it was dropped to 1.08:1. Mr. Lunde noted it
was very close and explained some of the background of how SONYMA calculates the debt
D
service requirement. He added that the rents projected for this project are about 90% of
the AMI. Mr. Lunde noted that with COVID, it does affect the way we factor in
commercial rents for projects. Mr. Turek asked if he thinks there will be more of a
demand for PILOTs going forward because of the current situation. Mr. Lunde advised
R
yes. It will be challenging; they will be looking for lower rents and longer PILOT terms.
Mr. Watson asked about the developer and Mr. Lunde noted that Mr. LaRosa has been in
business for over 30 years and they have done 3-4 projects with them in the past. Mr.
LaRosa spoke about his past projects completed over the past 40 years. He advised that
T
the property was purchased about ten years ago and they have put about $1 Million into
AF
the project so far. Mr. LaRosa noted that they are at the point with the project that they
are ready to start adding the finishing touches. Mr. Nolan asked about the additional units
going into the building. Mr. LaRosa advised that they unit size has been redesigned to
allow for additional units. Mr. Nolan asked if anyone is currently occupying the space. Mr.
LaRosa advised not at this time. Ms. Fitch asked if there is a need downtown for these
types of units. Mr. Lunde advised based on their research, the one bedroom/studios fill
up first followed by the two units. Mr. Cummings asked about the vacancy rates being
used in the calculations. Mr. Lunde advised a residential vacancy rate of about 7% and
10-12% for commercial; pre-COVID showed a vacancy rate of about 5%. Mr. Cummings
asked if the situations improve will the PILOT change. Mr. Turek noted that it is really an
income question at this point, not expenses. He added that if you lower one, the other
will increase and most of the census tracts in Troy are at or below the poverty line. Rents
have to be subsidized through HUD or PILOTs set up in order for the project to happen.
Mr. Cummings asked if the PILOTs have the ability to set rent rates. Mr. Miller advised we
have recapture provisions, but the projects are self-regulated; they either are market rate
or affordable. Mr. Nadeau asked if there were any other questions. Mr. Nolan would be
interested additional information on the rent changes. (See attached Resolution 06/20 #2)
Tina Urzan made a motion to approve the Initial Project Resolution for
Troy Riverwalk, LLC.
Elbert Watson seconded the motion, motion carried.
IV. Financials
3
Back to Agenda
Ms. Flores presented the statement of net position to the board. She advised that as of
May 31, 2020, the total assets stand at $748,000 with $506,000 in cash. The liabilities
stand at $72,000 leaving a fund balance of $676,000. No real changes.
Ms. Flores presented the statement of activity and explained that for the Monty of May
there is a $785 deficit. Revenue came from interest income. Ms. Flores advised expenses
for the month were $908.50; no out of the ordinary expenses.
Hon. Anasha Cummings made a motion to approve the financials as
presented.
Elbert Watson seconded the motion, motion carried.
V. Executive Directors Report, Old Business and New Business
City Station North - Mr. Strichman advised that City Station North is moving forward;
awaiting a demolition permit application.
669 River Street – Mr. Strichman noted that this project may not be moving forward as
the property is for sale.
DeFazio’s – Mr. Strichman advised that this project is slowly moving forward.
Montroy Management- Mr. Strichman advised the project at the former St. Augustine’s
D
will be moving forward.
King Fuels site - Mr. Nolan asked for an update on the King Fuels property. Mr.
Strichman advised that the grant given to them from this board and the CRC for cleanup
has been completed. He added that a license agreement between the LDC and National
VI.
R
Grid is being worked on so that the remediation can begin; phase 1 is set to begin in
September and phases 2 & 3 will each be a year apart.
Adjournment
T
AF
With no additional business to discuss, the regular board meeting was adjourned at 11:05
a.m.
Susan Farrell made a motion to adjourn the IDA meeting at 11:05 a.m.
Tina Urzan seconded the motion, motion carried.
4
Back to Agenda
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(701 River Street Associates, LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on June 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York
12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Justin Nadeau X
Richard Nolan X
Elbert Watson X
Susan Farrell X
D
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
X
X
X
X
R
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Justin Miller Esq.,
T
Mary Ellen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos, Tom Rossi, Donald LaRosa, Glen Lunde, Bernie, ?, and
Cheryl Kennedy.
AF
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a project
previously undertaken for the benefit of 701 River Street Associates, LLC, for itself or an entity
to be formed.
On motion duly made by Susan Farrell and seconded by Stephanie Fitch, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Justin Nadeau X
Richard Nolan X
Elbert Watson X
Susan Farrell X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Hon. Jim Gulli X
Tina Urzan X
Stephanie Fitch X
Page 1 of 5
Back to Agenda
Resolution No. 06/20 #1
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FROM 701 RIVER STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN
CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT PREVIOUSLY UNDERTAKEN
BY THE AUTHORITY (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN); (ii)
DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY; (iii) AUTHORIZING THE
SCHEDULING AND CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING; AND (iv)
AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
D
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
R
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a certain Project Authorizing Resolution adopted February 16,
T
2018 (the “Resolution”), the Authority appointed 701 RIVER STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC
AF
(the “Company”) as agent to undertake a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the
acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .57 acre parcel of real
property located at 701 River Street, Troy, New York 12180 and the retention of title to and/or a
leasehold interest in an approximately 1.36 acre portion of a parcel of real property located on
President Street, Troy, New York 12180 (collectively, the “Land”, being more particularly
identified as TMID No. 90.70-5-8 and a portion of TMID No. 90.70-1-7, along with adjoining
realty as may be acquired by the Company and integrated into the Project) and the existing 6-
story building located at 701 River Street, along with related parking, site and infrastructure
improvements located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design,
engineering, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and
Existing Improvements into a six story mixed use residential and commercial facility containing
up to 80 apartment units and approximately 15,000 square feet of commercial space, all to be
leased by the Company to residential and commercial tenants, including improvements and
replacements of roofs, interior and exterior utilities, elevator, building systems, windows,
exterior access and egress improvements, curbage, parking and related exterior improvements
(collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and
around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and
other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s
development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements
Page 2 of 5
Back to Agenda
(the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the
Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Project was undertaken by the Authority and Company pursuant to the
following agreements: (i) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement, dated as of
September 11, 2018 (the “Agent Agreement”), and (ii) a Lease Agreement (the “Lease
Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”), a certain Upland
Parcel Lease Agreement (the “Upland Parcel Lease Agreement”), and related Payment-in-lieu-
of-Tax Agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), along with related documents, each dated as of
December 20, 2018; and
WHEREAS, during the course of construction of the Facility, the building improvements
suffered a significant accidental fire loss and casualty, which has delayed the project completion
and requires the Company to re-invest significant resources and insurance proceeds to
rehabilitate, repair and replace extensive portions of the Facility; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the foregoing, the Company submitted a supplemental
D
Application for Financial Assistance to the Authority outlining additional amounts of sales and
use tax exemption benefits and requesting the Authority’s consideration of an amendment to the
Upland Parcel Lease Agreement to memorialize the Authority’s reimbursement of certain
qualified Project Expenditures to assist the Company with timely completion of the Project; and
R
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
T
AF
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
Page 3 of 5
Back to Agenda
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) increased amounts of sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals
acquired or procured in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; and
(ii) the reimbursement of certain qualifying Project Expenditures in furtherance of the Project.
D
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
R
deliver) the terms of (A) an amendment to the Agent Agreement, (B) an amendment to the
Upland Parcel Lease Agreement, and (C) related documents thereto; provided the rental
payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the
Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the
T
Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project.
AF
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 4 of 5
Back to Agenda
D
R
T
AF
Back to Agenda
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(Troy Riverwalk, LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on June 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York
12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Justin Nadeau X
Richard Nolan X
Elbert Watson X
Susan Farrell X
D
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
X
X
X
X
R
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT: Steven Strichman, Justin Miller Esq.,
T
Mary Ellen Flores, Deanna Dal Pos, Tom Rossi, Donald LaRosa, Glen Lunde, Bernie, ?, and
Cheryl Kennedy.
AF
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a project
previously authorized for the benefit of Troy Riverwalk, LLC, for itself or an entity to be
formed.
On motion duly made by Tina Urzan and seconded by Elbert Watson, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Justin Nadeau X
Richard Nolan X
Elbert Watson X
Susan Farrell X
Hon. Anasha Cummings X
Hon. Jim Gulli X
Tina Urzan X
Stephanie Fitch X
Page 1 of 5
Back to Agenda
Resolution No. 06/20 #2
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION
FROM TROY RIVERWALK, LLC (THE “COMPANY”) IN CONNECTION
WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY THE
AUTHORITY (AS FURTHER DEFINED HEREIN); (ii) DESCRIBING THE
FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THE
AUTHORITY; (iii) AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING AND CONDUCT OF
A PUBLIC HEARING; AND (iv) AUTHORIZING THE NEGOTIATION OF
CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE
PROJECT
D
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
R
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a certain Project Authorizing Resolutions adopted May 29, 2019
T
and March 20, 2020 (collectively, the “Resolution”), the Authority appointed TROY
AF
RIVERWALK, LLC (the “Company”) as agent to undertake a certain project (the “Project”)
consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .14
acres of land located at 171 River Street and Front Street (East of), Troy, New York 12180 (the
“Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 100.60-3-8 and 100.60-3-16) and the
existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 22,500 sf of multi-story
building spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the Existing Improvements
and the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a mixed use commercial and
residential facility containing approximately 6,000 sf of commercial space and 14 market rate
rental apartment units, all to be leased by the Company to commercial and residential tenants,
including building improvements, modifications, upgrades, and related site and exterior
improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Company has submitted an updated Application and advised the
Authority that they have undertaken certain design changes for the Facility, including the
Page 2 of 5
Back to Agenda
increase of apartment units from 14 to 18, and that the financing of same will require
modifications to the PILOT Agreement previously approved by the Authority; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) D By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
R
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B)
Act; and
The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
T
AF
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The definition of “Project” as contained within the Project Authorizing
Resolution and Agent Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows:
TROY RIVERWALK, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed
(collectively, the “Company”), consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately .14 acres of land located at 171 River Street and Front Street (East of),
Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 100.60-3-
Page 3 of 5
Back to Agenda
8 and 100.60-3-16) and the existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately
22,500 sf of multi-story building spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the
Existing Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a
mixed use commercial and residential facility containing approximately 6,000 sf of commercial
space and 18 market rate rental apartment units, all to be leased by the Company to commercial
and residential tenants, including building improvements, modifications, upgrades, and related
site and exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and
installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements
of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in
connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing
Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing
Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the
Company.
Section 3. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
D
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 4.
R
The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of and negotiate (but not execute or deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and
T
Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement,
AF
pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to
the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title to the Land and Project), (C) a related
Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority leases its interest in the Project back to
the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agrees to make certain
payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E) related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental
payments under the Leaseback Agreement include payments of all costs incurred by the
Authority arising out of or related to the Project and indemnification of the Authority by the
Company for actions taken by the Company and/or claims arising out of or related to the Project
and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax
Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation have been complied with.
Section 5. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 6. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Page 4 of 5
Back to Agenda
D
R
T
AF
Back to Agenda
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
701 RIVER STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC
JULY 17, 2020 AT 10:00 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the 701 River Street Associates, LLC Project held on Friday July 17,
2020 at 10:00 a.m., at the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York
12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Steven Strichman, Executive Director
[list other TIDA representatives in attendance]
[________________, Company Representative]
Members of the General Public
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). __________________opened the hearing and
_________________ read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by 701 River Street
Associates, LLC to the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and
inspection by the general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
701 RIVER STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to
be formed ( collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s assistance with a certain
project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in
approximately .57 acre parcel of real property located at 701 River Street, Troy, New York
12180 and the retention of title to and/or a leasehold interest in an approximately 1.36 acre
portion of a parcel of real property located on President Street, Troy, New York 12180
(collectively, the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No. 101.62-1-1 and a
portion of TMID No. 90.70-1-7) and the existing 6-story building located at 701 River Street,
along with related parking, site and infrastructure improvements located thereon (the “Existing
Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design, engineering, construction, reconstruction,
rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and Existing Improvements into a six story mixed
use residential and commercial facility containing up to 84 apartment units and approximately
10,000 square feet of commercial space, all to be leased by the Company to residential and
commercial tenants, including improvements and replacements of roofs, interior and exterior
utilities, elevator, building systems, windows, exterior access and egress improvements, curbage,
Back to Agenda
parking and related exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the
acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and
incidental in connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the
Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility
to the Company.
The Project was undertaken by the Authority and Company pursuant to the following
agreements: (i) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement, dated as of September
11, 2018 (the “Agent Agreement”), and (ii) a Lease Agreement (the “Lease Agreement”), related
Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”), a certain Upland Parcel Lease Agreement
(the “Upland Parcel Lease Agreement”), and related Payment-in-lieu-of-Tax Agreement (the
“PILOT Agreement”), along with related documents, each dated as of December 20, 2018.
During the course of construction of the Facility, the building improvements suffered a
significant accidental fire loss and casualty, which has delayed the project completion and
requires the Company to re-invest significant resources and insurance proceeds to rehabilitate,
repair and replace extensive portions of the Facility. In furtherance of the foregoing, the
Company submitted a supplemental Application for Financial Assistance to the Authority
outlining additional amounts of sales and use tax exemption benefits and requesting the
Authority’s consideration of an amendment to the Upland Parcel Lease Agreement to
memorialize the Authority’s reimbursement of certain qualified Project Expenditures to assist the
Company with timely completion of the Project (collectively, the “Financial Assistance”).
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates an increase in total project
cost from original estimates of approximately $10,585,000 to approximately $18,000,000.00.
Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the Agency estimates the
following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions (Total $736,000.00) = $ 306,000.00
(former cap $430,000 – increase of $306,000)
Project Expenditures = $ 250,000.00
Total estimated New Financial Assistance = $ 556,000.00
IV. SEQRA:
For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission is serving as lead agency for
purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA.
Back to Agenda
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at ________ a.m.
Back to Agenda
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
TROY RIVERWALK, LLC
JULY 17, 2020 AT 10:00 A.M.
CITY HALL, 433 RIVER STREET, 5TH FLOOR, TROY, NEW YORK 12180
Report of the public hearing of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the
“Authority”) regarding the Troy Riverwalk, LLC Project held on May 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., at
the Troy City Hall, located at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New York 12180.
I. ATTENDANCE
Steven Strichman, Executive Director
[list other TIDA representatives in attendance]
[________________, Company Representative]
Members of the General Public
II. CALL TO ORDER: (Time: 10:00 a.m.). __________________opened the hearing and
_________________ read the following into the hearing record:
This public hearing is being conducted pursuant to Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public
Authorities Law of the State of New York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of
the State of New York, as amended (collectively, the “Act”). A Notice of Public Hearing
describing the Project was published in Troy Record, a copy of which is attached hereto and is an
official part of this transcript. A copy of the Application submitted by Troy Riverwalk, LLC to
the Authority, along with a cost-benefit analysis, is available for review and inspection by the
general public in attendance at this hearing.
III. PROJECT SUMMARY
TROY RIVERWALK, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed
(collectively, the “Company”), consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately .14 acres of land located at 171 River Street and Front Street (East of),
Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 100.60-3-
8 and 100.60-3-16) and the existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately
22,500 sf of multi-story building spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the
Existing Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a
mixed use commercial and residential facility containing approximately 6,000 sf of commercial
space and 18 market rate rental apartment units, all to be leased by the Company to commercial
and residential tenants, including building improvements, modifications, upgrades, and related
site and exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and
installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements
of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in
connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing
Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing
Back to Agenda
Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the
Company.
It is contemplated that the Authority will acquire a leasehold interest in the Facility and
lease the Facility back to the Company. The Company will operate the Facility during the term
of the leases. The Authority contemplates that it will provide financial assistance (the “Financial
Assistance”) to the Company in the form of (a) a sales and use tax exemption for purchases and
rentals related to the Project; (b) mortgage recording tax exemptions(s) related to financings
undertaken by the Company to construct the Facility; and (c) a partial real property tax
abatement structured through a PILOT Agreement. The foregoing Financial Assistance and the
Authority’s involvement in the Project are being considered to promote the economic welfare
and prosperity of residents of the City of Troy, New York.
IV. AGENCY COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
The Company Application for Financial Assistance indicates a total project cost of
approximately $6,000,000.00. Based upon additional information provided by the Company, the
Agency estimates the following amounts of financial assistance to be provided to the Company:
Mortgage Recording Tax Exemption = $ 51,250.00
Sales and Use Tax Exemptions = $ 200,400.00
Estimated PILOT Savings = $1,220,973.82
Total estimated Financial Assistance = $1,472,623.82
IV. SEQRA:
For purposes of the Project, the City Planning Commission served as lead agency for
purposes of review pursuant to SEQRA.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
As there were no comments, the public hearing was closed at ________ a.m.
Back to Agenda
SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(701 River Street Associates, LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on July 17, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Justin Nadeau
Richard Nolan
Elbert Watson
Susan Farrell
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT:
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of 701 River Street Associates, LLC, for itself or an entity to be
formed.
On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Justin Nadeau
Richard Nolan
Elbert Watson
Susan Farrell
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
Back to Agenda
Resolution No. ____
SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i)
AUTHORIZING THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE WITH RESPECT TO A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER
DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT OF 701 RIVER STREET
ASSOCIATES, LLC (THE “COMPANY”); AND (ii) AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND
AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a certain Project Authorizing Resolution adopted February 16,
2018 (the “Resolution”), the Authority appointed 701 RIVER STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC
(the “Company”) as agent to undertake a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the
acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .57 acre parcel of real
property located at 701 River Street, Troy, New York 12180 and the retention of title to and/or a
leasehold interest in an approximately 1.36 acre portion of a parcel of real property located on
President Street, Troy, New York 12180 (collectively, the “Land”, being more particularly
identified as TMID No. 90.70-5-8 and a portion of TMID No. 90.70-1-7, along with adjoining
realty as may be acquired by the Company and integrated into the Project) and the existing 6-
story building located at 701 River Street, along with related parking, site and infrastructure
improvements located thereon (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the planning, design,
engineering, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and improvement of the Land and
Existing Improvements into a six story mixed use residential and commercial facility containing
up to 80 apartment units and approximately 15,000 square feet of commercial space, all to be
leased by the Company to residential and commercial tenants, including improvements and
replacements of roofs, interior and exterior utilities, elevator, building systems, windows,
exterior access and egress improvements, curbage, parking and related exterior improvements
(collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and
around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and
other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s
development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements
(the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the
Improvements, the “Facility”); and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Project was undertaken by the Authority and Company pursuant to the
following agreements: (i) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement, dated as of
September 11, 2018 (the “Agent Agreement”), and (ii) a Lease Agreement (the “Lease
Back to Agenda
Agreement”), related Leaseback Agreement (the “Leaseback Agreement”), a certain Upland
Parcel Lease Agreement (the “Upland Parcel Lease Agreement”), and related Payment-in-lieu-
of-Tax Agreement (the “PILOT Agreement”), along with related documents, each dated as of
December 20, 2018; and
WHEREAS, during the course of construction of the Facility, the building improvements
suffered a significant accidental fire loss and casualty, which has delayed the project completion
and requires the Company to re-invest significant resources and insurance proceeds to
rehabilitate, repair and replace extensive portions of the Facility; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of the foregoing, the Company submitted a supplemental
Application for Financial Assistance to the Authority outlining additional amounts of sales and
use tax exemption benefits and requesting the Authority’s consideration of an amendment to the
Upland Parcel Lease Agreement to memorialize the Authority’s reimbursement of certain
qualified Project Expenditures to assist the Company with timely completion of the Project
(collectively, the “Financial Assistance”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted June 19, 2020, the Authority (i) accepted
the Application submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a
Public Hearing with respect to the Project; (iii) described the Project and the Financial
Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is contemplating with respect to the
Project; and (iv) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of certain documents
in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described herein; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the resolution referenced above, the Authority duly
scheduled, noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on July 17, 2020 whereat all
interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or
in writing on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be
afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public
Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as
Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to authorize the provision of the Financial Assistance
and has negotiated the terms of an amendment to the Agent Agreement, the Upland Parcel Lease
Agreement, and related documents to effectuate the foregoing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
Back to Agenda
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) an
increase in sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; and (ii) the Authority’s
reimbursement of up to $250,000.00 in certain qualified Project Expenditures (the
“Expenditures”) to assist the Company with timely completion of the Project. The Financial
Assistance to be provided shall be memorialized within (i) an Amendment to the Agent
Agreement wherein the increased amounts of sales and use tax exemptions shall be delineated in
accordance with section 3, hereof, and (ii) and an Amendment to the Upland Lease Agreement
wherein the Company shall be required to repay the Project Expenditures to the Authority in the
form of additional rentals due thereunder (collectively, and along with related documents, the
“Amendments”). The Authority further authorizes the tolling of rentals payable pursuant to the
Upland Lease Agreement until the earlier of the Company closing on permanent financing for
the Project or April 28, 2024, at such time the Company shall be required to pay $100,000 in
accrued rentals and reimburse all Expenditures provided by the Authority pursuant to the
Amendments.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Amendments, along with the
delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other evidence of liability insurance policy for
the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority hereby authorizes the provision of the
Financial Assistance. The Authority further ratifies the prior appointment of the Company as
agent of the Authority to undertake the Project, with the foregoing authorization and appointment
by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake the Project shall expire on June 30,
2021, unless extended by the Executive Director of the Authority upon written application by the
Company.
Back to Agenda
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $9,200,000.00, which result in New York State and
local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$736,000.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Section 4. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to execute, deliver the
Amendments. The Authority further authorizes the provision of the Project Expenditures in an
amount not to exceed $250,000.00, which shall be provided to the Company as reimbursement of
qualified Project costs and repaid to the Authority in accordance with the terms of the
Amendments.
Back to Agenda
Section 5. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 6. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Back to Agenda
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy
Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the
foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the
Resolution contained therein, held on July 17, 2020, with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set
forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters
therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this ____ day of __________, 2020.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Back to Agenda
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Back to Agenda
SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION
(Troy Riverwalk, LLC Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on July 17, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, Troy, New York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT
Justin Nadeau
Richard Nolan
Elbert Watson
Susan Farrell
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT:
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of Troy Riverwalk, LLC, for itself or an entity to be formed.
On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Justin Nadeau
Richard Nolan
Elbert Watson
Susan Farrell
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
Resolution No. ____
Back to Agenda
SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (THE “AUTHORITY”) (i)
AUTHORIZING THE PROVISION OF ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE WITH RESPECT TO A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS FURTHER
DEFINED HEREIN) FOR THE BENEFIT OF TROY RIVERWALK, LLC (THE
“COMPANY”); AND (ii) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS RELATING
TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a certain Project Authorizing Resolutions adopted May 29, 2019
and March 20, 2020 (collectively, the “Resolution”), the Authority appointed TROY
RIVERWALK, LLC (the “Company”) as agent to undertake a certain project (the “Project”)
consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold interest in approximately .14
acres of land located at 171 River Street and Front Street (East of), Troy, New York 12180 (the
“Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 100.60-3-8 and 100.60-3-16) and the
existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately 22,500 sf of multi-story
building spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the Existing Improvements
and the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a mixed use commercial and
residential facility containing approximately 6,000 sf of commercial space and 14 market rate
rental apartment units, all to be leased by the Company to commercial and residential tenants,
including building improvements, modifications, upgrades, and related site and exterior
improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the
Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of
equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the
Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and
Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and
the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Company has submitted an updated Application and advised the
Authority that they have undertaken certain design changes for the Facility, including the
increase of apartment units from 14 to 18, and that the financing of same will require
modifications to the PILOT Agreement previously approved by the Authority; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted June 19, 2020, the Authority (i) accepted
the Company’s updated Application; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public
Hearing with respect to the Project; (iii) described the Project and the Financial Assistance (as
hereinafter defined) that the Authority is contemplating with respect to the Project; and (iv)
Back to Agenda
approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of certain documents in furtherance of
the Project, as more fully described herein; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the resolution referenced above, the Authority duly
scheduled, noticed and conducted the Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on July 17, 2020 whereat all
interested persons were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their views, either orally or
in writing on the location and nature of the Facility and the proposed Financial Assistance to be
afforded the Company in connection with the Project (a copy of the Minutes of the Public
Hearing, proof of publication and delivery of Notice of Public Hearing being attached hereto as
Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to authorize the provision of the updated estimated
amounts of Financial Assistance to be provided in connection with the Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an updated application in a form acceptable
to the Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company's application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, thereby increasing employment opportunities in the City of Troy, New York, and
otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a civic, commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries.
Section 2. The Authority hereby accepts the Minutes of the Public Hearing and
approves the provision of the proposed Financial Assistance to the Company, including (i) an
increase in sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
Back to Agenda
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; and (ii) the provision of a
PILOT Agreement for a term of up to 20 years, as set forth within the Cost-Benefit Analysis
presented at the Public Hearing.
Section 3. Subject to the Company executing the Agent Agreement and Leaseback
Agreements, along with the delivery to the Authority of a binder, certificate or other evidence of
liability insurance policy for the Project satisfactory to the Authority, the Authority hereby
authorizes the provision of the Financial Assistance. The Authority further ratifies the prior
appointment of the Company as agent of the Authority to undertake the Project, with the
foregoing authorization and appointment by the Authority of the Company as agent to undertake
the Project shall expire on December 31, 2021, unless extended by the Executive Director of the
Authority upon written application by the Company.
Based upon the representation and warranties made by the Company the Application, the
Authority hereby authorizes and approves the Company, as its agent, to make purchases of goods
and services relating to the Project and that would otherwise be subject to New York State and
local sales and use tax in an amount up to $2,505,000.00, which result in New York State and
local sales and use tax exemption benefits (“sales and use tax exemption benefits”) not to exceed
$200,400.00. The Authority agrees to consider any requests by the Company for increase to the
amount of sales and use tax exemption benefits authorized by the Authority upon being provided
with appropriate documentation detailing the additional purchases of property or services, and, to
the extent required, the Authority authorizes and conducts any supplemental public hearing(s).
Pursuant to Section 1963-b of the Act, the Authority may recover or recapture from the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, any sales and use tax exemption benefits taken or
purported to be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party
authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project, if it is determined that: (i) the
Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make
purchases for the benefit of the Project, is not entitled to the sales and use tax exemption
benefits; (ii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are in excess of the amounts authorized to
be taken by the Company, its agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to
make purchases for the benefit of the Project; (iii) the sales and use tax exemption benefits are
for property or services not authorized by the Authority as part of the Project; (iv) the Company
has made a material false statement on its application for financial assistance; (v) the sales and
use tax exemption benefits are taken in cases where the Company, its agents, consultants,
subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the benefit of the Project
fails to comply with a material term or condition to use property or services in the manner
approved by the Authority in connection with the Project; and/or (vi) the Company obtains
mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements and fails to comply with a
material term or condition to use property or services in the manner approved by the Authority in
connection with the Project (collectively, items (i) through (vi) hereby defined as a “Recapture
Event”).
As a condition precedent of receiving sales and use tax exemption benefits, mortgage
recording tax exemption benefits, and real property tax abatement benefits, the Company, its
agents, consultants, subcontractors, or any other party authorized to make purchases for the
Back to Agenda
benefit of the Project, must (i) if a Recapture Event determination is made by the Authority,
cooperate with the Authority in its efforts to recover or recapture any sales and use tax
exemption benefits, mortgage recording tax benefits and/or real property tax abatements
abatement benefits, and (ii) promptly pay over any such amounts to the Authority that the
Authority demands, if and as so required to be paid over as determined by the Authority.
Section 4. As set forth within the Authority’s resolution adopted June 19, 2020, the
definition of “Project” as contained within the Project Authorizing Resolution is amended to read
as follows:
TROY RIVERWALK, LLC, for itself and/or on behalf of an entity to be formed
(collectively, the “Company”), consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority of a leasehold
interest in approximately .14 acres of land located at 171 River Street and Front Street (East of),
Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID Nos. 100.60-3-
8 and 100.60-3-16) and the existing improvements located thereon consisting of approximately
22,500 sf of multi-story building spaces (the “Existing Improvements”), (ii) the renovation of the
Existing Improvements and the planning, design, engineering, construction and operation of a
mixed use commercial and residential facility containing approximately 6,000 sf of commercial
space and 18 market rate rental apartment units, all to be leased by the Company to commercial
and residential tenants, including building improvements, modifications, upgrades, and related
site and exterior improvements (collectively, the “Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and
installation by the Company in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements
of certain items of equipment and other tangible personal property necessary and incidental in
connection with the Company’s development of the Project in and around the Land, Existing
Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”, and collectively with the Land, the Existing
Improvements and the Improvements, the “Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the
Company.
Section 5. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 6. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Back to Agenda
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy
Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the
foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the
Resolution contained therein, held on July 17, 2020, with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set
forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters
therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this ____ day of __________, 2020.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Back to Agenda
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC HEARING MATERIALS
Back to Agenda
INITIAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
(Poestenkill Place Limited Partnership Project)
A regular meeting of the Troy Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”) was
convened on July 17, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 433 River Street, 5th Floor, Troy, New
York 12180.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman and, upon roll being called, the
following members of the Authority were:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Justin Nadeau
Richard Nolan
Elbert Watson
Susan Farrell
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
The following persons were ALSO PRESENT:
After the meeting had been duly called to order, the Chairman announced that among the
purposes of the meeting was to consider and take action on certain matters pertaining to a
proposed project for the benefit of Poestenkill Place Limited Partnership.
On motion duly made by _________ and seconded by __________, the following
resolution was placed before the members of the Troy Industrial Development Authority:
Member Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Justin Nadeau
Richard Nolan
Elbert Watson
Susan Farrell
Hon. Anasha Cummings
Hon. Jim Gulli
Tina Urzan
Stephanie Fitch
Back to Agenda
Resolution No. ____
RESOLUTION OF THE TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(THE “AUTHORITY”) (i) ACCEPTING THE APPLICATION OF
POESTENKILL PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FOR ITSELF AND/OR
AN ENTITY TO BE FORMED (COLLECTIVELY, THE “COMPANY”) IN
CONNECTION WITH A CERTAIN PROJECT (AS MORE FULLY DEFINED
BELOW); (ii) AUTHORIZING THE SCHEDULING, NOTICE AND
CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE PROJECT;
AND (iii) DESCRIBING THE FORMS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BEING
CONTEMPLATED BY THE AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Title 11 of Article 8 of the Public Authorities Law of the State of New
York, as amended, and Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1967 of the State of New York, as amended
(hereinafter collectively called the “Act”), the TROY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (hereinafter called the “Authority”) was created with the authority and power to
own, lease and sell property for the purpose of, among other things, acquiring, constructing and
equipping industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities as authorized by the Act; and
WHEREAS, POESTENKILL PLACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP for itself and/or on
behalf of an entity to be formed (collectively, the “Company”), has requested the Authority’s
assistance with a certain project (the “Project”) consisting of (i) the acquisition by the Authority
of a leasehold interest in an approximately 1.88 acre parcel of land located at 244-246 First
Street, Troy, New York 12180 (the “Land”, being more particularly identified as TMID No.
100.84-6-10) and the existing building improvements located thereon consisting of
approximately 15,000 sf of building spaces and related improvements (the “Existing
Improvements”), (ii) the demolition and removal of the Existing Improvements and the planning,
design, engineering, construction and operation of an 81 unit multi-family affordable rental
apartment facility, including common areas and related amenity spaces, covered and surface
parking spaces, curbage and related site and exterior improvements (collectively, the
“Improvements”), (iii) the acquisition and installation by the Company in and around the Land,
Existing Improvements and Improvements of certain items of equipment and other tangible
personal property necessary and incidental in connection with the Company’s development of
the Project in and around the Land, Existing Improvements and Improvements (the “Equipment”,
and collectively with the Land, the Existing Improvements and the Improvements, the
“Facility”), and (iv) the lease of the Facility to the Company; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority desires to adopt a resolution describing
the Project and the Financial Assistance (as hereinafter defined) that the Authority is
contemplating with respect to the Project; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that the Authority will (i) accept the Application
submitted by the Company; (ii) approve the scheduling, notice and conduct of a Public Hearing
Back to Agenda
with respect to the Project; and (iii) approve the negotiation, but not the execution or delivery, of
certain documents in furtherance of the Project, as more fully described below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE TROY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Company has presented an application in a form acceptable to the
Authority. Based upon the representations made by the Company to the Authority in the
Company’s application and in related correspondence, the Authority hereby finds and determines
that:
(A) By virtue of the Act, the Authority has been vested with all powers necessary and
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of the Act and to exercise all
powers granted to it under the Act; and
(B) The Authority has the authority to take the actions contemplated herein under the
Act; and
(C) The action to be taken by the Authority will induce the Company to develop the
Project, and otherwise furthering the purposes of the Authority as set forth in the Act; and
(D) The Project will not result in the removal of a commercial, industrial, or
manufacturing plant of the Company or any other proposed occupant of the Project from one
area of the State of New York (the “State”) to another area of the State or result in the
abandonment of one or more plants or facilities of the Company or any other proposed occupant
of the Project located within the State; and the Authority hereby finds that, based on the
Company’s application, to the extent occupants are relocating from one plant or facility to
another, the Project is reasonably necessary to discourage the Project occupants from removing
such other plant or facility to a location outside the State and/or is reasonably necessary to
preserve the competitive position of the Project occupants in their respective industries; and
Section 2. The proposed Financial Assistance being contemplated by the Authority
includes (i) a sales and use tax exemption for materials, supplies and rentals acquired or procured
in furtherance of the Project by the Company as agent of the Authority; (ii) mortgage recording
tax exemption(s) in connection with secured financings undertaken by the Company in
furtherance of the Project; and (iii) an abatement or exemption from real property taxes levied
against the Land and Facility pursuant to a PILOT Agreement to be negotiated.
Section 3. The Chairman, Vice Chairman, and/or Executive Director/Chief Executive
Officer of the Authority are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Authority, to schedule, notice
and conduct a public hearing in compliance with the Act and negotiate (but not execute or
deliver) the terms of (A) an Agent and Financial Assistance and Project Agreement (the “Agent
Agreement”), (B) a Lease Agreement, pursuant to which the Company leases the Project to the
Authority (or, a Deed of conveyance to the Authority whereby the Authority will acquire fee title
to the Land and Project), (C) a related Leaseback Agreement, pursuant to which the Authority
leases its interest in the Project back to the Company, (D) a PILOT Agreement, pursuant to
Back to Agenda
which the Company agrees to make certain payments in-lieu-of real property taxes, and (E)
related documents thereto; provided (i) the rental payments under the Leaseback Agreement
include payments of all costs incurred by the Authority arising out of or related to the Project and
indemnification of the Authority by the Company for actions taken by the Company and/or
claims arising out of or related to the Project and (ii) the terms of the PILOT Agreement are
consistent with the Authority’s Uniform Tax Exemption Policy or the procedures for deviation
have been complied with.
Section 4. The officers, employees and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized
and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority to do all acts and things required
and to execute and deliver all such certificates, instruments and documents, to pay all such fees,
charges and expenses and to do all such further acts and things as may be necessary or, in the
opinion of the officer, employee or agent acting, desirable and proper to effect the purposes of
the foregoing resolutions and to cause compliance by the Authority with all of the terms,
covenants and provisions of the documents executed for and on behalf of the Authority.
Section 5. These Resolutions shall take effect immediately.
Back to Agenda
SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF RENSSELAER )
I, ______________________, the undersigned, ____________________ of the Troy
Industrial Development Authority (the “Authority”), do hereby certify that I have compared the
foregoing extract of the minutes of the meeting of the members of the Authority, including the
Resolution contained therein, held on July 17, 2020, with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original and of such Resolution set
forth therein and of the whole of said original so far as the same relates to the subject matters
therein referred to.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that (A) all members of the Authority had due notice of said
meeting; (B) said meeting was in all respects duly held; (C) pursuant to Article 7 of the Public
Officers Law (the “Open Meetings Law”), said meeting was open to the general public, and due
notice of the time and place of said meeting was duly given in accordance with such Open
Meetings Law; and (D) there was a quorum of the members of the Authority present throughout
said meeting.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that, as of the date hereof, the attached Resolution is in full force
and effect and has not been amended, repealed or rescinded.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
Authority this ____ day of __________, 2020.
______________________________
(SEAL)
Back to Agenda
Get email alerts for Troy
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.