Planning Commission Meeting
Regular MeetingTulare, CA · August 10, 2020
Minutes
CITY OF TULARE PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Tulare Public Library—Council Chambers July 13, 2020
491 North M Street
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Miller, Cox, Rocha, Olivares
TEENS ON BOARD PRESENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Traci Myers, Community & Economic
Development Director
Mario Anaya, Principal Planner
Steven Sopp, Senior Planner
Lucie Brown, Commission Clerk
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice-Chair Rocha called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Olivares led us in the flag salute.
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
None.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
None
CONSENT CALENDAR:
(1) Minutes of the June 22, 2020 Regular Planning Commission Meeting
Planning Commission Minutes 1
July 13, 2020
(2) Extension of Time- Pleasant Oaks 5, 6, 7 (Villa Toscana 1 Tentative Subdivision Map)
(3) CEQA Exemption for Water Well 4-5 (Albers) Project- Resolution 5371
It was motioned by Commissioner Miller and seconded by Chairman Cox to approve the
Consent Calendar as presented.
Motion carried by unanimous vote.
PUBLIC HEARING:
(1) Zone Amendment No. 741/ Negative Declaration:
Steven Sopp, Senior Planner, reviewed with the Commission a request by Quest Equity,
LLC to amend Chapter 10.40 (Permitted and Conditional Uses in Commercial Zones) of
the City of Tulare Municipal Code to allow storage buildings, mini storage as a
conditional use within the C-3 (Retail Commercial) zoning designation. A Negative
Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Vice Chair Rocha opened the public hearing.
There being no one to speak in favor of or against the project, the public hearing was
closed.
Commissioner Miller explained she was hesitant to move forward with the zone
amendment request not knowing who, specifically, was the Applicant. Director Myers
clarified that the Applicant for the zone amendment is Quest Equity, LLC, an entity that
is developing a large project on Retherford and Corvina. She further explained that while
the zone amendment request was initiated by one developer, the benefits of the
amendment could extend to a number of developers throughout the City looking at
developing large-scale projects that propose a residential component.
Commissioner Miller expressed concerns about the aesthetics of a mini-storage facility
and felt the zone amendment was not advantageous to the development process.
Commissioner Oliveras inquired whether having a mini-storage in a C-3 zone would
increase traffic through residential neighborhoods. Mario Anaya, Principal Planner,
explained that the benefit of locating a mini-storage in a C-3 zone is that the C-3 zone is
typically closer to residential neighborhoods so there will not be traffic driving to the
industrial areas of town, which are typically further away from housing. Mr. Anaya
further clarified that if the zone text amendment is approved, an application for a mini-
Planning Commission Minutes 2
July 13, 2020
storage would still be subject to a Conditional Use Permit. With that process, the project
would be required to show it meets the design guidelines of the C-3 zone, which are more
stringent on aesthetics.
Vice-Chair Rocha asked whether the Applicant could request a zone change specific to
their project to allow for a mini-storage. Steven Sopp, Senior Planner, stated that the
request would also include a General Plan Amendment and may constitute spot zoning,
which is inconsistent with the City’s General Plan policies. Vice-Chair Rocha further
expressed concern about the use of C-3 zoned property for mini-storage projects due to a
lack of current available C-3 zoned properties within the City.
Following Commission discussion it was motioned by Commissioner Miller and
seconded by Commissioner Cox to recommend to the City Council denial of Zone
Amendment No. 741.
COMMISSIONERS
AYES: Miller, Cox, Olivares, Rocha ABSENT: Miguel
NOES: None ABSTAIN: None
GENERAL BUSINESS—NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None
TEENS ON BOARD:
None
DIRECTORS REPORT:
Director Myers noted that the City has been taking in applications to provide small businesses
with grants through the CDBG Cares Act. She also noted that the City is working with
restaurant owners to get them outdoor dining permits so that they may continue to operate.
Planning Commission Minutes 3
July 13, 2020
AJOURNMENT:
There being no other items to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 7:22
p.m.
___________________________
DEANNE ROCHA, VICE CHAIR
City of Tulare Planning Commission
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
TRACI MYERS, SECRETARY
City of Tulare Planning Commission
Planning Commission Minutes 4
July 13, 2020
Agenda
AGENDA
TULARE PLANNING COMMISSION
7:00 p.m.
MONDAY, August 10, 2020
TULARE PUBLIC LIBRARY & COUNCIL CHAMBERS
491 NORTH “M” STREET
MISSION STATEMENT
TO PROMOTE A QUALITY OF LIFE MAKING TULARE THE MOST
DESIRABLE COMMUNITY IN WHICH TO LIVE, LEARN, PLAY, WORK,
WORSHIP AND PROSPER
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. CITIZEN COMMENTS- This is the time for citizens to comment on items within the
jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission cannot legally
discuss or take official action on citizen comments that are introduced tonight. Each
speaker will be allowed three minutes, with a maximum time of 10 minutes per item,
unless otherwise extended by the Planning Commission.
IV. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
V. CONSENT CALENDAR:
(1) Minutes of the July 13, 2020 Regular Planning Commission Meeting
(2) Minutes of the July 27, 2020 Regular Planning Commission Meeting
City of Tulare Planning Commission Agenda
August 10, 2020 Page 1
VI. GENERAL BUSINESS- PUBLIC HEARING:
(1) Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-11/ Mitigated Negative Declaration :
Consider a request by EnterSolar on behalf of United States Cold Storage for
installation of an 810-kilowatt (kW) direct current photovoltaic ground mounted solar
array. This project will be located on the north side of Levin Avenue, east of South
“O” Street. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended.
Project Planner: Steven Sopp, Senior Planner
Recommended Motion: Adopt Resolution 5369, adopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-11, based on the
findings and subject to the conditions as listed in the staff report.
(2) Variance No. 464:
Consider a request by Craig Realty Group for a variance to allow 201 sq. ft. of
combined sign area in lieu of the maximum 81.5 sq. ft. for a storefront with 81.5
linear feet of store frontage. This project is located at 1691 Retherford Street. This
project is exempt pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended.
Project Planner: Steven Sopp, Senior Planner
Recommended Motion: Adopt Resolution 5372, approving Variance No. 464,
based on the findings and subject to the conditions as listed in the staff report.
VII. GENERAL BUSINESS-NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None
VIII. TEENS ON BOARD REPORTS
IX. DIRECTOR’S REPORT
X. ADJOURNMENT
City of Tulare Planning Commission Agenda
August 10, 2020 Page 2
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities and Brown Act, if you need special assistance to participate in the
meeting, including the receipt of the agenda and documents in the agenda package in an alternate format, please
contact the City Manager’s Office (559) 684-4200. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the city to
make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35, 104 ADA Title II), and
allow for the preparation of documents in the appropriate alternate format.
[Note: Pursuant to Government Code 54957.5- Effective 7/1/08 Documents produced and distributed less than 72
hours prior to or during an open session of a regular meeting to a majority of the legislative body regarding any item
on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at the meeting and at the Planning Department at City Hall
located at 411 East Kern Avenue during normal business hours.]
APPEAL PROCEDURE
According to City of Tulare Zoning Ordinance Section 10.20.020 and Subdivision Ordinance Section 8.24-080,
decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed by filing a letter with the City Clerk, located at 411 E. Kern
Avenue, Tulare, CA 93274, no later than ten (10) days after the day on which the decision was made. The appeal
shall state the name of the person making the appeal, the decision that is being appealed, and the reason for the
appeal, include ng an error, abuse of discretion or a decision that is not supported by the evidence in the record.
City of Tulare Planning Commission Agenda
August 10, 2020 Page 3
Get email alerts for Tulare
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.