Planning Commission Regular Meeting

Tyrone Planning Commission Agenda April 26, 2018 7:00 PM Planning Commission I. Call to Order Jeff Duncan II. Approval of Agenda Vice-Chairman Carl Schouw III. Approval of Minutes from April 12, 2018 Commissioner IV. Public Hearing David Nebergall Commissioner 1. Consideration of a text amendment from applicant Tamarkus T. Cook to amend Section 113-128 pertaining to the “Downtown Commercial Dia Hunter District (C-1),” of Article V of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Commissioner Tyrone, to add “Funeral Homes and Funeral Chapels” as a permitted use in the C-1 Zoning District. Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Scott Bousquet Development Coordinator. Commissioner 2. Consideration of a text amendment to Section 113-133 pertaining to Staff “Planned Unit Development (PUD),” of Article V of the Zoning ordinance of the Town of Tyrone, to add provisions for the inclusion Phillip Trocquet of a “Planned Town Center District” overlay. Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Planning & Development Coordinator. Development Coordinator 3. Consideration to adopt a resolution to annex a 20-acre tract with parcel number 0728-064 located along Farr Road into the Patrick Stough incorporated limits of the Town of Tyrone and assume R-20 Town Attorney (Residential 2,000 s.f min.) zoning. Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Development Coordinator. Meeting Information 4. Consideration to adopt a resolution to annex a 39-acre tract with 2nd & 4th Thursday parcel number 0728-015 located at 123 Farr Road into the of each month incorporated limits of the Town of Tyrone and assume R-20 (Residential 2,000 s.f min.) zoning. Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Development Coordinator. 881 Senoia Road Tyrone, Ga 30290 V. New Business 770-487-4038 www.tyrone.org VI. Staff Comments VII. Commission Comments VIII. Adjournment  Town of Tyrone Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Thursday April 12, 2018 7:00 PM Present: Chairman, Jeff Duncan Vice-Chairman, David Nebergall Commission Member, Carl Schouw Commission Member, Dia Hunter Commission Member, Scott Bousquet Town Attorney, Ali Cox Planning & Development Coordinator, Phillip Trocquet Planning Commission Chairman Jeff Duncan called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Approval of Agenda Vice-Chairman Nebergall made a motion to approve the agenda. Commissioner Schouw seconded the motion. Motion was approved 4-0. Approval of Minutes for March 22, 2018 Commissioner Nebergall made a motion to approve the minutes from March 22, 2018 conditioned upon the rectification of two grammatical errors; one on page two and another on page three. Commissioner Hunter seconded the motion. Motion was approved 4-0. Public Hearing: 1. Consideration of a rezoning petition of a 1 acre tract with parcel number 0736-060 from applicant Brett Vincent. Requested rezoning is from C-2 (Highway Commercial) to M-1 (Light Industrial). Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Development Coordinator. Mr. Trocquet presented the item. Mr. Trocquet stated that the property’s existing zoning was C-2 with an existing land use of commercial-office. The surrounding zoning districts consisted of M-1 (Light Industrial) to the north and west, C-1 (Downtown Commercial) to the south, and Unincorporated Fayette County Residential and C-2 to the east. Site improvements included water. Mr. Trocquet stated that the requested rezoning was unfortunately not consistent with the Town’s zoning ordinance as the rezoning of the property from C-2 to M-1 would increase the front yard setback from 50 feet to 100 feet thus putting the majority of the existing structure within the new setback. Mr. Trocquet stated that this would result in the creation of an illegal structure per the zoning code. Staff recommendation was not for approval. Page 1 of 4 Chairman Duncan opened the pubic hearing for those in favor of the rezoning. Applicant Brett Vincent spoke. Mr. Vincent stated that he appreciated appearing before Planning Commission. He stated that he lives at 378 Ebenezer Church Road in Fayetteville, GA and that he lived in Tyrone for 13 years before moving to Fayetteville. He stated that he owns Gatekeeper Property Management Co. and is looking to move his main office and his staff to Tyrone. He was interested in combining the property in question with the one directly to the north in order to locate offices and a climate controlled self-storage facility on the combined site. Mr. Vincent pointed to a map of the general area depicting both properties (Exhibit 1). He pointed out that most of the land surrounding the entrance to Shamrock Industrial Park off of Rockwood Road was zoned M-1. He pointed to the M-1 lot directly north of parcel 0736-060 and stated that the shape of the lot made it difficult from a development perspective. He pointed out the buildable footprint of the M-1 property to the north and stated that there was a problem with the number of easements and general shape of the buildable area in terms of putting a traditional building on the site. Mr. Vincent then began speaking about parcel 0736-060 and stated that he is not proposing an addition to the structure that exists on the property. Mr. Vincent stated that he believed the existing office to be arguably the best-looking building in the area. Commissioner Bousquet wanted to confirm that Mr. Vincent was not proposing any additions or expansions to the existing office. Mr. Vincent confirmed that he did not plan to expand the structure and that it was approximately 20% larger than his existing office in Fayetteville. Mr. Vincent stated that his proposed entrance to the self-storage facility would be located off of Rockwood Road and that the average traffic flow for the proposed facility would be approximately 1 car per hour. He went on to say that it would be a very low impact on the property and that there would be very little to no noise, pollution, or traffic impact. Mr. Vincent stated that he is proposing a class-A facility with improved landscaping, fencing, and architectural design with no exterior doors proposed. Mr. Vincent, displayed an additional map showing the increased buildable footprint if parcel 0736-060 were to be rezoned to M-1 and subsequently combined with the property directly to its north. He stated that the elimination of the existing setback between the properties would be the most practical move. He also said that he had many conversations with surrounding property owners who were in support of the proposed development. Mr. Vincent stated that his main business of managing rental properties that would be held out of the office would also generate minimal traffic. He stated that the majority of the traffic flow is generated by his employees who stay during the day. He stated that he understood the issue regarding the creation of an illegal structure as a result of the increased setback, but that he was ultimately not looking to modify the use of the building. He stated that from a practical point of view he did not see how it posed an issue, but he understood there were other legal considerations. Commissioner Bousquet asked Mr. Vincent if he had any site plans showing the location or layout of the proposed self-storage facility. Mr. Vincent stated that at this point, he did not have an exact layout for where the building would be located on the site. Commissioner Bousquet then asked if he had an idea as to where he would locate the facility, Mr. Vincent stated that since it was climate-controlled interior storage it would likely be a single rectangular structure in the center of the combined lot. Commissioner Bousquet asked how close that proposed location would be to the existing office. Mr. Vincent stated that it would likely be whatever the building code required. Vice-Chairman Nebergall asked Mr. Vincent if he would consider demolishing the structure so that it would fit within the zoning requirements. Mr. Vincent stated that he would consider it if it were the only option, but that he would need to confront the seller of the properties to renegotiate the price as the building was included in the current sale price. Mr. Vincent stated that if that were the case, he would build his office into the proposed self-storage facility. Mr. Vincent also stated that he was aware that a denial of his application would result in a 6-month waiting period before an additional application could be made. He stated that if his petition was not doable, he would be willing to withdraw his application. Commissioner Hunter asked if the relocation of some of those power lines would improve the buildability of the lot. Mr. Vincent stated that it would and that per his discussion with Fayette-Coweta EMC, the power line on the front of the property would be approximately $30,000-$40,000 to relocate. Mr. Vincent stated that he would need to do more Page 2 of 4 research to see if investing in power line relocation would provide enough benefit. He went on to state that there is plenty of demand for self-storage in the area and that his proposed facility would improve the overall area. He also stated that he would not need large or unappealing signage on the property as most self-storage advertising is done online. Commissioner Schouw asked if Mr. Vincent owned the properties in question. Mr. Vincent stated that he had both properties under contract, but that he was not yet the primary owner. Chairman Duncan asked if there were any others who wished to speak in favor of the rezoning petition. Dr. Billy Watts, owner of Peachtree City Animal Clinic at 343 Senoia Road, approached the podium. He stated that he had been in the area since the property on the corner was Barbecue Junction and subsequently torn down. Dr. Watts stated that he was glad the old buildings on the corner were torn down, but that the proposed development would be suitable to the area. He also spoke in favor of the property being redeveloped and cleaned up as it is currently an eyesore due to overgrowth. Mr. Vincent stated that his proposed development would be the best-looking facility at the Rockwood and Senoia Roads intersection Chairman Duncan closed the public hearing for those in favor of the rezoning. Chairman Duncan opened the public hearing for those in opposition to the rezoning. No one spoke. Chairman Duncan opened the item for commission discussion. Commissioner Hunter asked Ms. Cox to confirm that if the Commission were to approve this rezoning request, they would in effect make something that was legal, illegal. Ms. Cox confirmed that was the case. Commissioner Hunter asked if there was some kind of process that has been done before that would essentially make the illegal structure legal again. Ms. Cox stated that if the town voted to approve the rezoning, they would be responsible for the creation of the illegal structure thereby creating a precedent; she also stated there was not much the town could do to make it legal after the fact. Commissioner Nebergall stated that he was in favor of Mr. Vincent’s preliminary development plan, but that he was not comfortable with a rezoning that would immediately put the Town in a legal predicament. Vice-Chairman Nebergall stated that he believed it would set an unwanted precedent. Commissioner Bousquet stated that he agreed and stated that he saw no problem with what Mr. Vincent wanted to do in terms of locating his self-storage business at that location, but that he felt uncomfortable supporting something that goes against the zoning ordinance and sets a precedent for future developments. Commissioner Hunter requested confirmation from staff that if Mr. Vincent were to rezone the norther parcel from M-1 to C-2, Mr. Vincent could increase his buildable area and combine the two properties, but that self-storage facilities were not permitted in that zoning district. Mr. Trocquet (Planning & Development Coordinator) confirmed that this would be the case. Mr. Hunter stated that if Planning Commission recommended denial and Council ultimately denied Mr. Vincent’s application, there would be a six-month waiting period between a subsequent application, but if Mr. Vincent withdrew his application, he would have the ability to represent an application that did not include a request for the creation of an illegal structure. Planning Commission asked Mr. Vincent if he would like to withdraw his rezoning request. Mr. Vincent stated that he would. Vice-Chairman Nebergall made a motion to approve the withdrawal. Mr. Hunter seconded the motion. Motion passed 4-0. Old Business: New Business: Page 3 of 4 Public Comments: Staff Comments: Commission Comments: Vice-Chairman Nebergall asked Mr. Trocquet about the situation with the Tyrone Rd. turn lane. Mr. Trocquet stated that the turn lane design not allowing a dedicated right hand turn and the removal of the acceleration lanes was the result of GDOT requirements. Mr. Trocquet stated that based on conversations with GDOT officials, the Town does have the ability to increase the length of the right-hand turn lane to allow more cars to stack in that lane and that the Town is also inquiring as to how they can reopen the acceleration lanes. Mr. Trocquet stated that GDOT required the acceleration lanes to be striped off because of safety concerns. Chairman Duncan gave an update from the county Master Transportation Plan stakeholder meeting. He stated that the focus for the meeting was on a master path plan for the county and that there was discussion around bike lanes and multi-use trails such as the Silver Comet Trail. He stated that they identified some roads and routes that could be interconnected throughout Fayette County for paths. Mr. Trocquet stated that there will be an additional public engagement meeting similar to the last one held except that there will be an emphasis on path planning. Commissioner Hunter stated that Tyrone and Peachtree City utilize golf carts and that many paths do not allow motorized vehicles. Chairman Duncan stated that was commented on during his meeting and that they discussed the fact that charging stations would be a big part of path planning in Fayette County. Mr. Trocquet stated that the more the discussion progresses, the more PTV’s (Personal Transport Vehicles) would be part of the conversation. He stated that given the large use of PTVs within Fayette County, it is likely that any major path networks would allow them. He stated that any paths that connect beyond the county into an Atlanta regional network may not allow PTVs. Commissioner Bousquet inquired as to the path plan for Tyrone and its status. Mr. Trocquet stated that the town did not have a formally adopted Master Path Plan, but that there was a map created that showed future path projects identified by previous administrations. Adjournment: Commissioner Nebergall made a motion to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:32 pm. ____________________ __________________ Jeff Duncan, Planning Commission Chairman Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Development Coordinator Page 4 of 4  Town of Tyrone Cover Sheet– 04/26/2018 Contact: ptrocquet@tyrone.org Subject: Text Amendment to Downtown Commercial District. Adding Funeral Homes/Chapels. A. Background/History: Applicant Tamarkus Cook has submitted a Text Amendment Application to add Funeral Homes/Funeral Chapels to the C-1 (Downtown Commercial) zoning district. Currently, Funeral Homes and Funeral Chapels are only permitted in the C-2 Zoning District. Application and red- lined ordinance is attached. B. Summary: It is staff's opinion that a text amendment adding funeral homes/funeral chapels to the C-1 district is consistent both with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Funeral homes would be considered an assembly use consistent with other assembly uses currently permitted in the C-1 zoning district such as assembly halls, auditoriums, banquet halls, and convention or exhibition halls. A cursory study of funeral home of traffic and utility impacts does not seem to suggest that a funeral home development would be a diversion from the intent of the ordinance for that district. C. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval ec. 113-128. - Downtown commercial district (C-1). (a) Permitted uses : (1) Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services; (2) Advertising agencies; (3) Adult day care; (4) Amphitheaters; (5) Antique stores; (6) Apparel and accessory stores (including dressmaker and tailor); (7) Appraisers; (8) Art galleries; (9) Art studios; (10) Assembly halls; (11) Attorneys; (12) Automobile claims adjuster; (13) Auditoriums; (14) Bail bonding services; (15) Bakeries, retail; (16) Banquet halls; (17) Barbershops and beauty shops; (18) Bicycle repair shops; (19) Blood donor stations; (20) Blueprinting and photocopying services; (21) Book and stationery stores; (22) Bowling alley; (23) Business agents and brokers; (24) Business service support establishments; (25) Camera and photographic supply stores; (26) Carryout/delivery establishments; (27) Catalog mail order stores; (28) Caterers; (29) Cigar stores and stands; (30) Clerical; (31) Collection services; (32) Commercial photography, art and graphics offices; (33) Computer or data processing offices; (34) Convention or exhibition halls; (35) Counseling and guidance services; (36) Credit reporting services; (37) Dance schools; (38) Delicatessen and gourmet food stores (with incidental catering); (39) Dental care services; (40) Detective agency and protective services (excluding armored cars and animal rental); (41) Dinner theatres; (42) Doctors/physicians' offices; (43) Drafting services; (44) Drugstores; (45) Eating establishments, when accessory to a permitted use; (46) Electric transformer stations, gas regulator stations and telephone exchanges; (47) Employment agencies; (48) Engineering, planning and architectural offices; (49) Fabric shops; (50) Farm and garden supply stores; (51) Finance, insurance and real estate institutions; (52) Florists; (53) Food specialty shops (ice cream, coffee, soda fountain); (54) Funeral Homes and Funeral Chapels (54 55) Furniture, home furnishing and appliance stores; (55 56) General building contractors; (56 57) Gift, novelty and souvenir stores (excluding adult novelty); (57 58) Glass sales; (58 59) Grocery stores limited to a floor area not exceeding 5,000 square feet; (59 60) Gyms; (60 61) Hardware sales; (61 62) Historical society/welcome, information centers; (62 63) Hobby, toy and game shops; (63 64) Hotels; (64 65) Household and apparel stores; (65 66) Indoor sports facilities; and (66 67) Interior decorator services; (67 68) Jewelry sales and repair; (68 69) Key duplicating shops; (69 70) Kitchen-ware stores; (70 71) Laundry and dry cleaning pick-up stations; (71 72) Lawn and garden supply; (72 73) Libraries; (73 74) Locksmiths; (74 75) Lodging houses; (75 76) Management, consulting and public relations services; (76 77) Manicure services (nail care); (77 78) Meat, seafood and poultry markets (excluding live poultry); (78 79) Medical photography; (79 80) Message answering services; (80 81) Museums; (81 82) Musical instrument sales and repair; (82 83) News dealers and newsstands; (83 84) Notary public; (84 85) Occupational physical therapy; (85 86) Office uses as part of a planned office center; (86 87) Optician and optometry stores; (87 88) Parks; (88 89) Pawn shops; (89 90) Pet shops; (90 91) Pharmacies; (91 92) Photographic studios; (92 93) Picture framing stores; (93 94) Playhouses; (94 95) Political organizations; (95 96) Produce markets; (96 97) Publishing only: newspaper, periodicals and books; (97 98) Radio, television and stereo sales and service; (98 99) Repair, as an accessory use; (99 100) Retail automotive parts and tire stores; (100 101) Restaurants, general and convenience; (101 102) Seasonal outdoor retail (activity for the sale of flowers, garden supplies, produce); (102 103) Shoe repair and sales; (103 104) Skating rinks; (104 105) Special trade contractors; (105 106) Specialized non-degree schools; (106 107) Specialized merchandise stores; (107 108) Sporting goods; (108 109) Swimming pools (prefabricated), hot tubs and spa sales;  (109 110) Talent and theatrical booking agents; (110 111) Telephone business offices; (111 112) Telecommuting centers; (112 113) Travel agencies; (113 114) Used goods stores; (114 115) Video sales and rentals (excluding adult entertainment); and (115 116) Visiting nurse associations. (b) Conditional uses (see article VII) : (1) Animal hospitals and veterinary clinics; (2) Arcades; (3) ATMs; (4) Automobile brokers; (5) Bed and breakfasts; (6) Cemeteries; (7) Day nurseries and kindergartens; (8) Dog grooming shops. (9) Electrical supply stores; (10) Electric transformer stations, gas regulator stations and telephone exchanges; (11) Indoor pet boarding; (12) Laundry and dry cleaning establishments including pick-up stations, package plants and coin- operated facilities; (13) Neighborhood recreation center or swimming pools; (14) Paint, glass and wallpaper stores; (15) Private or parochial schools; and (16) Public utility facilities. (c) Development standards: (1) Minimum lot area—One acre; (2) Minimum lot width—100 feet; (3) Yard setbacks: a. From a major thoroughfare—80 feet; b. From a collector—70 feet; c. From a residential street—55 feet; d. Rear yard setbacks—30 feet; e. Side yard setbacks—20 feet; (4) Maximum height of structures—40 feet, with structures not to exceed three overall stories; (5) Where a lot adjoins a single-family residential, MHP, or the AR zoning district—75-foot buffer (June 21, 2001); and (6) Maximum building size—30,000 square feet (February 15, 2001). From: Text Amendment Application To: permits.tyrone@gmail.com Subject: New submission from Text Amendment Application for a Text Amendment Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 11:12:04 AM Applicant Information Name Tamarkus T. Cook Address 59 Neely Run Newnan, Georgia 30265 United States Map It Email markustcook@gmail.com Phone (678) 877-2096 Text Amendment Petition Subject: Text Amendment Section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance to be amended: Section Allowing Funeral Homes to be included in C-1 Classifcation Please state the current provisions of the text to be affected by the amendment. Funeral homes are currently designated C-2 I am requesting a C-1 designation. Please state the reason for the amendment request. To occupy existing property in community for the purpose of funeral service. Master Plan/Zoning Ordinance Explain how the proposed Text Amendment is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Future Development Map, and Zoning Ordinance. This will allow strategic, safe and good growth at the proposed site which aligns closely with the current desired target business demographic. A sustainable business. Explain how the proposed Text Amendment will enhance the functionality or character of future development in the Town of Tyrone. It will enhance the property, provide local residents with an opportunity to properly arrange ceremonies of the deceased without leaving the community - increasing tax revenue and convenience. Describe how the proposed Text Amendment will protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public. This amendment will bring a staple business to the community which will add tremendously to the everyday life growth and development of the public. Environment & Other Explain how the proposed Text Amenmdment is needed to correct an error or omission in the original text. The previous text does not allow the use of the proposed property which would be of benefit to the city. Describe how the proposed Text Amendment will address a community need in physical or economic conditions or development practices. The current site has been considered an eye sore for nearly a decade - this will allow a complete transition of the property improving curb appeal. Certification By checking the box below, the petitioner states that he/she has read, understands and has completed this application. Petitioner Certification  Town of Tyrone Cover Sheet– 04/26/2018 Contact: ptrocquet@tyrone.org Subject: Text Amendment pertaining to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section of the zoning ordinance to add provisions for a Planned Town Center District. A. Background/Summary: B. Recommendation: Staff recommends withdrawal of this application. Staff Report Town of Tyrone, Department of Planning & Zoning Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Zoning Coordinator Date: April 26, 2018 881 Senoia Road, Tyrone GA 30290 ptrocquet @tyrone.org (770) 487-4038 ex. 108 DOCKET/CASE/APPLICATION NUMBER APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER RZ-2018-007 Trent Foster/Allegiance Development Group PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE COUNCIL MEETING DATE ADDRESS/LOCATION April 26, 2018 May 03, 2018 Parcel Number: 0728-064 off Farr Rd. Summary Applicant, Allegiance Development Group, is submitting an application for annexation and subsequent rezoning for two properties near the intersection of Dogwood & Farr Roads: a 20 acre tract with parcel number 0728-064 and a 39 acre tract directly to the south with property address 123 Farr Road. The proposed zoning to be assumed with the annexation is R-20 (2000 s.f. minimum) It is staff's understanding that the proposed future use of these properties will be for the development of a roughly 39 lot subdivision similar in style to the Stonecrest Preserve Subdivision started in 2017 by the same developer. This annexation petition has already been presented before the County Commission who has presented no objection save that no entrance to the proposed subdivision be located off of Dogwood trail and that the Town of Tyrone maintain all ROW along the small 1-acre tract directly on the corner of Dogwood & Farr with property address 539 Dogwood Trail MAP SOURCE EXISTING ZONING EXISTING LAND USE SURROUNDING ZONING SITE IMPROVEMENTS SIZE OF PROPERTY & LAND USE Unincorporated Fayette Agricultural/Estate North: R-12 Water 20 Acres County AR Residential South: Unincorporated AR East: Unincorporated AR West: R-18 & R-20 STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS DENY COMPATIBILITY WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MAP PROPERTY HISTORY There is an existing home and accompanying older outbuildings on the site from previous Properties are fully compatible with the future use as an agricultural property. It is staff's understanding that these structures will be development map. The Future Development Character area for the surrounding properties is Estate parceled out during the development of the proposed subdivision for continued use by the Residential. The proposed R-20 zoning and current residents. preliminary development plan for 1-acre lots is consistent with this Character Area. COMPATABILITY WITH ZONING ORDINANCE The proposed annexation and R-20 zoning classification for these properties is compatible with surrounding uses and the zoning ordinance. 1-acre lot residential development is low intensity and has a low impact on surrounding residential uses. Staff Report Town of Tyrone, Department of Planning & Zoning Phillip Trocquet, Planning & Zoning Coordinator Date: April 26, 2018 881 Senoia Road, Tyrone GA 30290 ptrocquet @tyrone.org (770) 487-4038 ex. 108 DOCKET/CASE/APPLICATION NUMBER APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER RZ-2018-008 Trent Foster/Allegiance Development Group PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE COUNCIL MEETING DATE ADDRESS/LOCATION April 26, 2018 May 03, 2018 123 Farr Road Summary Applicant, Allegiance Development Group, is submitting an application for annexation and subsequent rezoning for two properties near the intersection of Dogwood & Farr Roads: a 20 acre tract with parcel number 0728-064 and a 39 acre tract directly to the south with property address 123 Farr Road. The proposed zoning to be assumed with the annexation is R-20 (2000 s.f. minimum) It is staff's understanding that the proposed future use of these properties will be for the development of a roughly 39 lot subdivision similar in style to the Stonecrest Preserve Subdivision started in 2017 by the same developer. This annexation petition has already been presented before the County Commission who has presented no objection save that no entrance to the proposed subdivision be located off of Dogwood trail and that the Town of Tyrone maintain all ROW along the small 1-acre tract directly on the corner of Dogwood & Farr with property address 539 Dogwood Trail MAP SOURCE EXISTING ZONING EXISTING LAND USE SURROUNDING ZONING SITE IMPROVEMENTS SIZE OF PROPERTY & LAND USE Unincorporated Fayette Agricultural/Estate North: Unincorporated AR Water 39 Acres County AR Residential South: Unincorporated AR East: Unincorporated AR West: R-20 STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS DENY COMPATIBILITY WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT MAP PROPERTY HISTORY There is an existing home and accompanying older outbuildings on the site from previous Properties are fully compatible with the future use as an agricultural property. It is staff's understanding that these structures will be development map. The Future Development Character area for the surrounding properties is Estate parceled out during the development of the proposed subdivision for continued use by the Residential. The proposed R-20 zoning and current residents. preliminary development plan for 1-acre lots is consistent with this Character Area. COMPATABILITY WITH ZONING ORDINANCE The proposed annexation and R-20 zoning classification for these properties is compatible with surrounding uses and the zoning ordinance. 1-acre lot residential development is low intensity and has a low impact on surrounding residential uses. D R-18 (Res.1800 sq.ft. min.) D AR Agricultural Residential Zoning Map: D R-20 (Res. 2000 s.f. min.) Intersection of Dogwood Rd. & Farr Rd. D R-12 (Res. 1200 s.f. min.) Tyrone Roads 0 500 1000  (770) 914-9394 (Office) ATLANTA (770) 914-9596 (Fax) DONEGAL DRIVE www.moorebass.com TALLAHASSEE 135 Keys Ferry Court McDonough, Georgia 30253 39 38 TAYLOR 350' 29 RIDGE CT. 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 PROPOSED POND 37 FLOODPLAIN 1 125' FARR ROAD / DOGWOOD TRAIL TRACT ALLEGIANCE DEVELOPMENT 139' PROPOSED BUFFER 100 GLENDALOUGH CRT, SUITE B8 2 FAYETTE COUNTY, GA PROJECT NAME CLIENT NAME 22 23 315' TYRONE, GA 30290 24 25 26 27 28 FARR ROAD 139' 3 315' 4 19 18 21 20 REVISIONS 17 5 16 6 15 125' DOGWOOD-FARR ARCHIVE DATE 10-31-2017 FILE # 7 8 9 10 350' 11 14 CONTRACT # 12 DRAWN BY The Drawings, Specifications and other documents prepared by Moore Bass Consulting, Inc. (MB) for this Project are instruments of MB for use solely with respect to this Project and, unless otherwise 13 provided, MB shall be deemed the author of these documents and shall retain all common law, C:\Projects\DOGWOOD\DOGWOOD-FARR.dwg, TOPO, smoore, Oct 31, 2017 - 9:54:06am statutory and other reserved rights, including the copyright. 1350 KEYS FERRY COURT McDONOUGH, GA 30253 LSF #1179 SEAL PROPOSED BUFFER DOGWOOD TRAIL GRAPHIC SCALE SHEET TITLE 100 0 50 100 200 400 CONCEPTUAL LOT YIELD ( IN FEET ) PLAN 1 inch = 100 ft. SHEET C Moore Bass Consulting 1.0