Town Council Meeting

Tyrone Town Council Meeting Minutes January 20, 2022 7:00 P.M. Present: Mayor, Eric Dial Mayor Pro Tem, Gloria Furr Council Member, Linda Howard Council Member, Melissa Hill Council Member, Billy Campbell Town Manager, Brandon Perkins Town Planner, Phillip Trocquet Town Clerk, Dee Baker Town Attorney, Dennis Davenport Recreation Manager, Rebecca Brock Recreation Assistant, Lynda Owens Police Chief, Randy Mundy Finance Manager, Sandy Beach Court Clerk, April Spradlin Mayor Dial called the meeting to order with limited seating and broadcasted on YouTube Live at 7:00 pm, this was followed by the invocation. The public was invited to watch. I. CALL TO ORDER II. INVOCATION III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS: The first public comment period is reserved for non-agenda items. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Please state your name & address. Comments that require a response may not be answered during this time. The Council or staff may respond at a later date. V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made to approve the agenda. Motion made by Council Member Furr, Seconded by Council Member Campbell. Voting Yea: Council Member Howard, Council Member Hill. VI. CONSENT AGENDA: All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine by the Town Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will not be separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Consideration to approve the minutes from the December 16, 2021 Council Meeting. 2. Veterans Park Memorial Bench in Memory of Tom Wilson P a g e 1 | 12  3. Consideration to approve a donation to the Police Department from The American Armor Foundation in the amount of $4,270 for body armor. 4. Consideration to hire Lindsey Johnson for the Town's Public Safety Clerk/Assistant Court Clerk position. April Spradlin, Clerk of Court A motion was made to approve the consent agenda. Motion made by Council Member Howard, Seconded by Council Member Campbell. Voting Yea: Council Member Hill, Council Member Furr. VII. PRESENTATIONS 5. State of the Town Address. Eric Dial, Mayor Mayor Dial gave his State of the Town Address. It's an honor to come before the people of Tyrone each year to offer a report on the State of the Town. I'm pleased to say to you without hesitation, and with very few exceptions, that the state of the Town is strong. Even in the midst of a pandemic and a difficult economic season in our nation, Tyrone continues to prosper. You have probably noticed some changes downtown and we are working to see that there are more to come in the near future. Our former Town Hall chamber has been fully equipped as an outstanding Museum. I want to thank all of those who have worked and continue to work so hard on that project. Our downtown sewer expansion is complete and the accompanying ordinance has been updated. This provides the necessary infrastructure for existing and new businesses who want a presence in this part of town. In addition to this infrastructure, the long-term success for downtown is comprised of many stages. The first is planning. It's critical that we create plans that reflect the will of our people and clearly define a vision for decades to come. The first formal plan came in the form of our Livable Centers Initiative, which relied heavily upon public input to provide a recommended framework for the future of downtown. The LCI focuses on everything from the future of Shamrock Park to traffic management on Senoia Road to development ideas for specific properties within downtown. We have already begun to use the LCI in making decisions about town-owned assets and working with landowners, businesses, and potential investors about privately-owned properties. Our other formal plan will be the upcoming Comprehensive Plan which provides a stronger, closer to binding, recommendation for the entire town. Again, this will be done relying heavily upon public input so that our citizens are in the driver's seat in determining the future of Tyrone. P a g e 2 | 12 After careful planning, we will put our newly created Downtown Development Authority into action. The DDA will have the ability to take properties entrusted to them and determine their best use. The benefit of this body is the level of flexibility and agility they have that a government does not have. We’re excited about the future of this Authority and we’re confident they will represent the town well. Next up, investment. Government’s primary job is to lay the groundwork for investment and create a destination that is desirable to those who want to live, work, eat, spend and play in town. Staff, Council, and I are committed to doing just that. The decisions we make are intended to accomplish that goal. We have made every effort to put taxpayers’ money where our mouths are, and we have done so without raising the millage rate in the last 13 years. We have kicked off investment by putting millions of dollars, primarily in downtown. In addition to sewer, this building will lead the way aesthetically in development. We would like to see other projects copy the design and architectural standards of Town Hall. We are investing hundreds of thousands of dollars on cart path expansion and improvement, with the priority on paths that are in downtown or bring citizens to downtown. For example, a path on Tyrone Road coming soon will bring residents on the east side (Farr Road and Tyrone Road) of 74 to the adjacent businesses, restaurants, and parks. Speaking of parks, we have dedicated approximately $150,000 to a new playground for Shamrock Park. Specifically, this one is located just behind the tennis courts and is the larger of the two playgrounds at Shamrock. We recognize the importance of Shamrock Park and will always ensure that it is attractive and safe. Not only are we investing in downtown, but we are beginning to see businesses invest in downtown. We’ve tried to make it advantageous to operate here and we encourage businesses to look at the value of this Town. I want to take this opportunity to publicly express our thoughts and prayers for those that were impacted by yesterday’s fire. I spoke with the owners of Red Door Consignment, Southern Shed Boutique, and Townsel Heating & Air today to let them know that we will do everything we can within the law to make sure they are back on their feet as quickly as possible. One business owner was effusive in telling me how overwhelmed they have been by the support of the community. We agreed that it’s this dynamic that makes Tyrone a great place to live and work. We want other investors to experience this same sense of place. Over the last four to five years, we have been able to do many projects because of the voter- approved SPLOST. You may ask, “what does that extra penny pay for?” P a g e 3 | 12 The answer is, road resurfacing, sewer expansion, cart path expansion, stormwater improvements, park improvements, debt reduction, this building, streetscape improvements, and much more. For example, in the coming year, we plan to resurface Farr Road, build a new cart path along Tyrone Road, and a roundabout at Arrowood/Palmetto/Spencer roads. We will also be working on improvements to Handley and Redwine Parks. This will involve building restrooms and storage for the Handley soccer fields and upgrades to Redwine Park that have not been finalized yet. We thank the voters for helping Tyrone and Fayette County keep up with our surrounding counties in this way. The SPLOST is set to expire next year so we are currently giving consideration to a renewal vote so more projects can be funded. This past year we were able to fill three much-needed, newly-created positions. Two of them were in our public works department, and one was in our zoning and planning department. All three of these employees have fit in extremely well and they are a huge help to the others in their departments. Our public works department now has six full-time positions. Scott, Mitch, David, Matt, Rod, and Cody do a fantastic job keeping our town attractive, clean, and safe. I was reminded of this Saturday. While the rest of us were on our “free time” Cody and David were preparing our roads for the threat of potential snow and ice. We can’t take for granted the work they do and the sacrifice all of these men make on our behalf. Thanks, guys! We are blessed with several dozen fantastic employees. I think of Patty and our Library staff – the silent faithful who are committed to their members and operating a superior library. Our police department and court staff. Thank you for once again doing your part to make Tyrone one of the 5 safest cities in Georgia. April and Randy, please make sure everyone over here knows we appreciate them. Rebecca and Lynda, I think you have actually increased your events this year. You welcomed the entire county for its 200th birthday, you helped with a new Shamrock Market, along with continuing our other events. Welcome back Rebecca, and kudos to Lynda for carrying the torch while Rebecca was out. The admin side – which I affectionately, but incorrectly refer to as The West Wing. We are grateful for your attitudes and dedicated work product. You make the workplace a positive experience. In a time where many Americans are choosing not to work because they can depend on the government instead of working – we recognize that our employees are working. We also recognize that inflation is higher than it has been in over 40 years so that means your cost of living is higher. P a g e 4 | 12  We also know you are having to pay more now on health care premiums than you were this time last year. And yet, you are loyal and hard-working. A verbal “thank you” and a pat on the back are nice, but that doesn’t pay the bills. In an attempt to reward your loyalty and work ethic in service to our citizens, over the next two weeks we will be finalizing the details of a significant pay raise for our employees across the board. We trust that this pay raise will soften the blow of the current economy and help you support your families. The last two years have been challenging – certainly the most challenging of my life. Yet Tyrone has shown its true colors. We have opened our doors to our neighbors. We have encouraged one another in times of grief. We have supported one another during sickness and lost jobs. And now we are rushing to the rescue of businesses who have lost everything. I have personally been blessed by the kindness of others, and I have had the honor of returning the favor. It’s what we do and it’s who we are. There’s a reason I call it God’s Country. 2022 shows the promise of being a better year. Fully staffed and sufficiently funded, we look forward to an upcoming budget season where we can evaluate our needs and resources, and appropriate them to make Tyrone an even better place to live. In addition to the approval of grant requests for dam repairs, we ask you to join us in our prayer that the Lord will continue to bless us, keep us safe, make us good neighbors, and represent Him well in all that we do. The five of us thank you again Tyrone for allowing us to serve you. 6. Employee Appreciation - Lynda Owens Rebecca Brock, Recreation Manager Ms. Brock shared that staff appreciated Mayor Dial and Council and all they do and for their support. She shared that she recently went on maternity leave, and shared that her special time at home with her first child would not have been possible without the assistance of Lynda Owens. She added that with the dozens of programs and classes, winter was the busiest time of year. The season offered the Founders Day Festival, the Christmas Tree Lighting, and Cookies with the Clauses. Ms. Brock shared that while she was on leave, Ms. Owens handled the entire season by herself with help from the wonderful volunteers. She added that Lynda Owens makes a huge difference in Tyrone, she welcomes everyone with joy and friendship. Her dedication reminded her of an essay by Loren Eiseley, The Star Thrower. Even if someone makes a difference in only one person’s life, they are still making a difference. Ms. Brock shared that Ms. Owens makes such an impact on volunteers, instructors, and the public, when she is not present people always notice and ask. She truly makes a difference. She thanked Ms. Owens and presented her with a gift of appreciation and a certificate. Ms. Owens stated that she worked for a wonderful community, she appreciated Ms. Brock, Mayor and Council and it was an honor to live in and serve Tyrone. P a g e 5 | 12 VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. Consideration to hear a petition from Jason Walls on behalf of the owner, for the rezoning of a 6.32-acre tract with parcel number 07260010 at property address 1420 Senoia Road, the proposed rezoning will be from O-I (Office Institutional) to C-2 (Highway Commercial). Phillip Trocquet, Town Planner Mr. Trocquet informed Council that applicant Randy Wright had applied to rezone his 1420 Senoia Road, not Powers Court, which was the business park. The stated intent of the rezoning was to develop a Commercial Business Park compatible with C-2 uses particularly trade uses. The property was originally zoned O-I to locate a medical office park on the property. In the early 2000’s the development, which was under preliminary site construction, was abandoned. Subsequent development in the business park assumed C-1 and C-2 zoning for heavier commercial uses. He added that C-2 (Highway Commercial) was listed as an appropriate zoning classification for the Commercial Corridor Future Land Use Map. The Powers Court business park incorporated O-I zoning early in its development, but properties were slowly rezoned to light and highway commercial to accommodate heavier commercial business uses. Although not a requirement of the rezoning, staff requested a traffic study showing the difference in traffic impact between Office and C-2 zoning based on the proposed development plan to understand the impact. He stated that given the traffic assessment as well as the presence of other C-2 zoned properties across the street, he recommended approval. He shared that the Planning Commission discussed traffic at length and recommended approval of the rezoning. Mr. Trocquet shared that Highway Commercial zoning existed adjacent to the property. Such uses were compatible adjoining other uses in the district and in the Powers Court business park. He added that staff determined that Highway Commercial zoning would not adversely affect the commercial properties surrounding it. Mr. Trocquet shared that C-2 zoning was consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan as the property lay within the Commercial Corridor Future Development Character area which encouraged high-quality commercial growth with heightened architectural and landscaping requirements. The traffic study did not reflect a downgraded level. The applicant had a concept plan which would not be voted on tonight. He added that it was staff’s opinion that the current commercial zoning proved reasonable economic use, however, other properties adjacent to the property had been rezoned C-2 consistent with other properties in the business park. Mr. Trocquet stated that staff determined that C-2 zoning would be unlikely to cause an excessively burdensome use for that particular property. The Powers Court business park had a common stormwater infrastructure system that was not yet at capacity. C-2 zoning had the potential to increase the impact on roads, however, that was usually associated with office and retail uses. The proposed uses were consistent with the rest of the business park would not generate unreasonable traffic. He added that the Planning Commission discussed at length the potential for additional traffic. He shared a concept plan for what the development may look like and added that they may consider purchasing the adjoining property in the future. P a g e 6 | 12  Council Member Campbell asked what type of business would be placed there. Mr. Trocquet stated that the applicant was applying for C-2, the heavier side of commercial uses, which included automotive, or trade contractors, among others. Council Member Howard asked if the property the owner may purchase in the future would be located on the east side? Mr. Trocquet stated that the owner showed interest in parcel 072604009 (1420 Senoia Rd). This was all part of an undeveloped plan many years ago. Mayor Dial opened the public hearing for anyone that wished to speak in support of the request. Attorney, Rick Lindsey spoke for the applicants, Mr. Wright and Mr. Barnett. He stated that the applicant was not interested in housing any auto-type business, it would be more geared toward medical product providers and light contractors. He wished to provide transparency and added that the additional parcel should be in possession within 45 days, and would come back to Council for another rezoning. He restated that the applicant was asking for a rezoning from OI to C-2 which was in line with the surrounding properties, it was also in line with the Comprehensive Plan and the Commercial Corridor. Regarding traffic, he stated that they did not anticipate any large truck traffic, only sprinter vans and pick-up trucks with limited deliveries. Mr. Lindsey added that the traffic study indicated a traffic reduction with the change in zoning from OI to C-2, with four times less traffic. He shared that the development would be aesthetically pleasing and would incorporate a new pretty entrance into Powers Court office park. He added that the additional property would incorporate all of the Quality Overlay District qualifications. Mayor Dial opened the public hearing for anyone that wished to speak in opposition to the item. No one spoke. A motion was made to approve the rezoning of the 6.32-acre tract with parcel number 07260010 at property address 1420 Senoia Road, the proposed rezoning will be from O-I (Office Institutional) to C-2 (Highway Commercial) Motion made by Council Member Furr, Seconded by Council Member Campbell. Voting Yea: Council Member Howard, Council Member Hill 8. Submission to amend the Town's Future Development Map as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Phillip Trocquet, Town Planner Mr. Trocquet explained that the item before them did not happen often. Any time there were changes made to the Comprehensive Plan, changes would also need to be made to the Future Land Use Map, which required a public hearing. Mr. Trocquet informed Council that in anticipation of the establishment of a Downtown Development Authority and to further the goals stated in the Town's downtown master plan LCI, Envision Tyrone, staff had proposed an intermediate amendment to the Town's Future Development Map as part of the Comprehensive Plan. He added that much more extensive adjustments to the map Town-wide would happen at the end of our Comprehensive Plan revision period as well. That would likely be in 5-6 months. Mr. Trocquet stated that the two primary character areas receiving adjustments were the In-Town Residential character area and the Town Center character area. P a g e 7 | 12 There was also a slight adjustment of the map on the south end of Town along Senoia Road, regarding the Production and Employment Character area per Council’s request. He explained that their materials indicated zoning classifications, descriptions, and the Future Development Map, along with the development strategies. He specified that the In-Town Residential character area should surround the Town Center character area and develop as the walkable neighborhoods that serve the downtown. That character area would also support slightly higher density residential for those purposes and have the potential to be served by sewer. He added that the boundary had been adjusted to better reflect that. He then specified that the Town Center character area had been the focus of many studies over the past year. The character area should reflect a primarily commercial development pattern in a walkable small-town environment with Senoia Road as the main street. Mr. Trocquet allowed Council and the public to view the Future Land Use Map as it currently existed and indicated that adjustments were made due to some walkable areas being separate within the Town Center District. These areas should be connected to serve the downtown area. Some properties along Senoia Road were built-out as Estate Residential (low-density, single- family), which most of the town should be. The adjustment to the map indicated that the Town Center was in the center of town and that In-Town immediately surrounded that area. He indicated that an additional adjustment was made along the south-end of Senoia Road due to Council’s request. Staff placed those few properties that were previously Production and Employment under the Estate Residential character area. He added that appropriate classifications had been placed within the Town Center and the Town Center Overly. The development strategy was also enhanced to better reinforce what was within the LCI. He shared that the Town Center District also reflected that Shamrock Park was at the center. Town-owned properties were indicated along with road connectivity. He also included the description and development strategy of the In-Town Neighborhood sections. He asked Council for their recommendation to the changes as presented including what was requested by Council at a previous meeting. The intermediate, quick changes would better prepare the Town for their new Downtown Development Authority (DDA). He ended by stating that a lot of interest had been shown recently for the downtown area, and final touches would come for the Future Land Use Map. Council Member Howard began a discussion regarding several properties along the west end of Dogwood Trail. She began with the Slaton’s property and questioned why it changed from Rural-Estate Residential to Production and Employment. Mr. Trocquet stated that it was selected accidentally and that he would be happy to make the changes, excluding Mr. Slaton’s property. Council Member Hill inquired about the three Adam’s properties that also reflected the Production and Employment character area. Mr. Trocquet stated that the three properties reflected what was approved by Council many years prior. He reiterated that he would change the Slaton property to reflect In-Town Residential. Council Member Howard suggested speaking with the families before changing the Future Development Map. Mr. Trocquet recommended leaving the three properties “as is” (Production and Employment). Council Member Howard asked for clarification regarding the meaning of Production and Employment. Mr. Trocquet clarified that it represented heavier industrial business growth. P a g e 8 | 12 Mr. Trocquet restated that he would change the Slaton property to reflect the correct classification, however, the Adam’s properties had always been listed under Production and Employment. Council Member Furr suggested contacting the Adams family and asking them what they wanted it to be, before making any changes to the map. Mr. Trocquet informed Council that making any changes to the Future Development map was usually not implemented and required a high-level review process. Individual changes were rarely made to properties. He added that the Future Land Use map did not affect current property owners as long as they owned the property. He recommended leaving the properties as they were and perhaps including the owners and properties in future discussions regarding the Comprehensive Plan. Council Member Howard asked for clarification regarding the all-blue section as it pertained to a denied rezoning in that area in the past. Mr. Trocquet clarified that the discussion in the past revolved around certain properties fronting along Senoia Road near the railroad track. Mr. Trocquet instructed Council that the map was not an indicator of zoning categories, it was a future development character area that would influence zoning decisions in the future. Council Member Howard clarified that the map was a component of the Comprehensive Plan. She added that the map indicated the three residential properties were currently representing Production and Employment. Mr. Perkins agreed and added that it had reflected the same since 2007. He reiterated that the map did not force property owners into a specific zoning category. He added that the properties were across the railroad tracks very near to the industrial park. It made sense that at some point in the future, if the family were to sell the property, being that it was in close to the industrial park that the property would fall under the Production and Employment character area. Council Member Howard stated that the family also had relatives across the street and on the other side of the railroad tracks. Mr. Trocquet stated that if Council wished to recommend that the area assume a different character area, staff could make the change as well as correct the Slaton error. Mr. Davenport clarified that the Slaton and Adams’ properties be changed to Rural Estate Residential. Council Member Howard agreed and also asked to include the Bryant property as well, because there was a house there, why would you make it something else. Mr. Perkins restated that the map was intended for future development. Mr. Trocquet informed Council that the types of boundaries were part of the standard planning procedure, based upon fixed elements such as streams, roads, and land lot lines. These elements rarely change over time and the map was meant to encompass defined areas. Property lines may change over time, properties could be combined. The map takes into account largely vacant land, which was mostly vacant west of the railroad tracks and south of Dogwood Trial. That area was between an industrial park and a rock quarry. He added that 15-20 years in the future if the land became vacant, the boundary markers had not changed. Based on that character area it would be Production and Employment. The areas could be based on any boundaries that Council wished. The most common planning procedure at that time was to make that character area a Production and Employment development pattern. By doing so, it did not make the property owners develop as Production and Employment. If they all had Agricultural zoning, they could build homes and even sub-divide their property. They could continue to do so as long as they owned the property. The map explained what their property would be in the future and why the boundaries would be established. He added that Council could create the boundary any way they wished. If they wished for the area to remain Agriculture, we could do that, or Estate Residential. P a g e 9 | 12 Mr. Trocquet highlighted that Production and Employment was the highest category and Estate Residential was the lowest, he added that typically there would be a large buffer in between the two categories. Council Member Hill asked, what would take place if the owner sold next year? Mr. Trocquet explained that the property could be rezoned and it would increase the property value because the category was a higher intensity. Mayor Dial clarified that if the properties were within the blue (Production and Employment) the property would be more valuable to the owner. Mr. Trocquet explained that yes, they have the potential to come to Council to request a rezoning. Council Member Hill stated that if the Adams family sold their property and the new owner rezoned, the Slaton family would be surrounded by Production and Employment. Council Member Howard stated that there would be no way to get to the Adams’ property unless they went through the Slaton’s property. Mr. Trocquet stated that any development would need to go through a site plan approval. He confirmed with Council that the Slaton property would be corrected and he would add the Adams’ properties into the Rural Estate Residential character area. Council Member Howard added the Roberts’ property as well. Mr. Trocquet restated again, that the character areas did not force property owners to do anything to their properties, it was only a future classification. Council Member Furr stated that if she were one of the property owners, it would seem like the Town was trying to do something behind her back. Mr. Perkins disagreed. Council Member Furr continued and stated that she believed that everything should be above board and out in the open. We should have contacted those people and they should have been here. Mr. Trocquet stated that the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Development map were adopted as a result of public input from all Town citizens. The goal of the Future Development map was not to control an individual’s property but to approximate the citizen’s will for what they deemed as most appropriate for future development in the Town. It would then be adopted by Council. Council Member Furr shared that she understood, however, citizens may not see it the same way when they have not been contacted. She added that property was rezoned to Duplex in the past without the property owner’s knowledge. Mayor Dial confirmed that it was before the current Council board. Council Member Howard stated that it seemed like if a house was on a property, why would it be placed within the Production and Employment character area, with houses also across the street. Mr. Trocquet shared that staff and the Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the Land Use Map. Mayor Dial opened the public hearing for anyone that wished to speak in favor of the item. No one spoke. Mayor Dial opened the public hearing for anyone that wished to speak in opposition to the item. No one spoke. A motion was made to approve the Future Land Use Map adjustments and to update the narrative descriptions to go with each character area with changes to the Slaton, Adams, and Robert’s properties from Production and Employment to Estate Residential character area. P a g e 10 | 12  Motion made by Council Member Campbell, Seconded by Council Member Howard. Voting Yea: Council Member Hill Voting Nay: Council Member Furr 9. 2017 Comprehensive Growth and Development Plan - Process and Public Input Phillip Trocquet, Town Planner Mr. Trocquet informed Council that the Town was required to update the Comprehensive Plan on a 5-year basis. The last update was in 2017. The current update would be completed in June of 2022. A series of public hearings and public engagement, offering public comment would be a part of the State's procedures. He added that the public hearing was intended to brief the community on the process that would be used to update the Comprehensive Growth and Development Plan and would offer opportunities for public participation in the development of the said plan as well as to obtain input on the proposed planning process. He shared that no vote from Council was required at this time, only input from the public. Mayor Dial opened the public hearing for anyone in support of the item. No one spoke. Mayor Dial opened the public hearing for anyone that wished to speak in opposition to the item. No one spoke. 10. Consideration for a text amendment to Section 113-134 of Article V of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Town Center Architectural Design considerations (request to withdraw). Phillip Trocquet, Town Planner Mr. Trocquet recommended the withdrawal of the item for a future meeting to have a more thorough workshop session to review the changes. A motion was made to withdraw the item for a future workshop meeting. Motion made by Council Member Furr, Seconded by Council Member Hill. Voting Yea: Council Member Howard, Council Member Campbell. IX. OLD BUSINESS X. NEW BUSINESS 11. Nomination of Mayor Pro Tem through December 31, 2022. Eric Dial, Mayor Mayor Dial recommended Council Member Furr for the position of Mayor Pro Tem. A motion was made to nominate Council Member Furr for the position of Mayor Pro Tem through December 31, 2022. P a g e 11 | 12  Motion made by Council Member Campbell, Seconded by Council Member Hill. Voting Yea: Council Member Howard. XI. PUBLIC COMMENTS: The second public comment period is for any issue. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Please state your name & address. Comments that require a response may not be answered during this time. The Council or staff may respond at a later date. XII. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Brock shared that the Town had a wonderful volunteer force. She added that Ms. Kaye Pate, the longest-standing volunteer was nominated for the Small Town of America Civic Award. 100 volunteers out of 7,000 are chosen. The nominees were given a national honorary award as well. She then presented Ms. Pate with that award. Ms. Pate shared that she loved the Town and loved helping in any way she could. XIII. COUNCIL COMMENTS XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION A motion was made to move into Executive Session for one (1) item of threatened litigation. Motion made by Council Member Furr, Seconded by Council Member Campbell. Voting Yea: Council Member Howard, Council Member Hill. A motion was made to reconvene. Motion made by Council Member Furr, Seconded by Council Member Campbell. Voting Yea: Council Member Howard, Council Member Hill. XV. ADJOURNMENT A motion was made to adjourn. Motion made by Council Member Campbell, Seconded by Council Member Hill. Voting Yea: Council Member Howard, Council Member Hill, Council Member Furr. The meeting adjourned at 8:28 pm. By: __________ ________________________ Attest: ________________________ Eric Dial, Mayor Dee Baker, Town Clerk P a g e 12 | 12