Civilian Police Review Board Meeting
Regular MeetingUrbana, IL · February 12, 2021
Minutes
APPROVED MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
_____________________________________________________________________________________
URBANA CIVILIAN POLICE REVIEW BOARD
DATE: Friday, February 12, 2021
TIME: 6:00 p.m.
PLACE: Virtual Via Zoom
Urbana City Building
400 South Vine Street
Urbana, Illinois 61801
______________________________________________________________________________
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ricardo Díaz, Scott Dossett, Katrina Kindle, Darrell Price,
Anthony Rice.
MEMBERS NOT PRESENT: Tony Allegretti,
1. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND DECLARATION OF QUORUM
Chair Ricardo Diaz called this special meeting of the Urbana Civilian Police Review
Board to order at 6:00 p.m. Chair Diaz stated that Tony Allegretti would not be able to
attend. Diaz stated procedure would include public input, followed by closed session,
decisions, and finally adjournment.
2. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Christopher Hansen welcomed Anthony Rice as a new voting member of the CPRB.
Christopher shared some concerns in regards to the procedures of bringing forth
documentation within the complaint process as well as the redaction process.
Emily Close share comments in regards to watching viral meetings as a whole. Emily
requested that the Chair of the meeting announce and share all of the participants in the
meeting prior to public participation, so participants know whom they are addressing.
Ricardo Diaz announced all present participants and UPTV staff who were in attendance.
Scott Dossett provided follow up commentary to Mr. Christopher Hansen’s procedural
concerns.
3. MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CONDUCTING AN APPEAL HEARING pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) to consider
and/or hear testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee of the public body or
against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity.
4. Scott Dossett made a motion to go into closed session for the purpose of conducting an
appeal hearing on cases AP20-01, AP20-02, AP20-05, AP20-09, and AP20-18. Katrina
Kindle seconded the motion. The motion carried by a roll call vote.
5. MOTION TO RECONVINING PUBLIC SESSION TO UNDERTAKE SUCH
ACTION, IF ANY, AS THE BOARD DEEMS APPROPRIATE Chair Ricardo Diaz
announced that there would not be an Appeals Hearing meeting on February 19, 2021 as
previously scheduled. Chair Ricardo Diaz called for a motion to return to open session.
Scott Dossett made the motion. Katrina Kindle seconded the motion. The motion carried
by roll call vote.
Ricardo Diaz stated that board would be voting on appeal AP20-07 tonight and the other
appeals listed on the agenda would be rescheduled for another date.
Chair Ricardo Diaz called for a motion to vote on case AP20-06. Scott Dossett made a
motion on case AP20-06 that the Civilian Police Review Board sustain the findings of the
UPD Police Chief. Darrell Price seconded the motion. The motion carried by roll call
vote as follows: Diaz – yes; Dossett – Yes; Kindle – Yes; Price – Yes; Rice - Yes.
Scott Dossett made a motion on case AP20-04 that the Civilian Police Review Board
sustain the findings of the UPD Police Chief. Darrell Price seconded the motion. The
motion carried by roll call vote as follows: Diaz – Yes; Dossett – yes; Kindle – yes; Price
– yes; Rice – yes.
Chair Ricardo Diaz called for a motion to vote on case AP20-17. Katrina Kindle made a
motion on case AP20-17 that the Civilian Police Review Board sustain the findings of the
UPD Police Chief. Scott Dossett seconded the motion. The motion did not carry by roll
call vote as follows: Diaz – no; Dossett – no; Kindle – no; Price – yes; Rice – no.
City Administrator Carol Mitten made a Point of order: She shared that the CPRB voted
down the sustainment of AP 20-17, however that the CPRB had not voted to sustain or
remand, out of a total of 5 options.
Katrina Kindle amended her motion to NOT sustain the findings of the UPD Police
Chief. Scott Dossett seconded the motion. The motion carried by roll call vote as
follows: Diaz – yes; Dossett – yes; Kindle – yes; Price – No; Rice – yes.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Scott Dossett made a motion to adjourn. Scott Anthony Rice seconded the motion. The
motion carried by a roll call vote.
Respectfully submitted,
Lemond Peppers
Community Engagement Coordinator
2
Agenda
Special Meeting
Civilian Police Review Board
DATE: Friday, February 12, 2021
TIME: 6:00 pm
PLACE: *to be held virtually via Zoom, 400 Vine St, Urbana, IL 61801
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PUBLIC INPUT
4. MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CONDUCTING AN APPEAL HEARING pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2(c)(1) to consider
and/or hear testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee of the public body or
against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity.
Cases to be heard: AP20-04 (Complaint #2020-R8)
AP20-06 (Complaint #2019-09)
AP20-08 (Complaint #2020-04)
AP20-10 (Complaint #2020-R14)
AP20-17 (Complaint #2020-07)
5 MOTION TO RECONVENE IN PUBLIC SESSION TO UNDERTAKE SUCH
ACTION, IF ANY, AS THE BOARD DEEMS APPROPRIATE
6. ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular Meeting: February 24, 2021 at 5:30 pm
*Due to the Governor and Mayoral Emergency Orders, the Urbana City Council Chambers will be
not be open to the public during this meeting. Anyone can watch the meeting on streaming services,
UPTV, or attend virtually via Zoom webinar. Attached are instructions on how to submit public
input during the meeting.
Persons with disabilities needing special services or accommodations for this meeting should contact
the City of Urbana's Americans with Disabilities Coordinator at 384-2466.
Zoom Webinar Information
When: Feb 12, 2021 06:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada)
Topic: Civilian Police Review Board Appeals Hearing
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82934534850
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +13126266799,,82934534850# or +13017158592,,82934534850#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 312 626 6799 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248
7799 or +1 669 900 6833
Webinar ID: 829 3453 4850
International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbSzwtz9Et
PUBLIC INPUT GUIDELINES
The City of Urbana welcomes Public Input during open meetings of the City Council, the City
Council’s Committee of the Whole, City Boards and Commissions and other City-sponsored
meetings. Our goal is to foster respect for the meeting process, and respect for all people
participating as members of the public body, city staff, and general public. The City is required to
conduct all business during public meetings. The presiding officer is responsible for conducting
those meetings in an orderly and efficient manner.
Public Input will be taken in the following ways:
Zoom Webinar Participant Click on the link listed in the agenda to join the Webinar. You must
provide your name and email address in order to join the Webinar. If you wish to speak during
Public Input, “raise your hand” and wait to be called on by the meeting host. You must state your
first and last name for the meeting record. Participants will be muted except when they are called on
to speak; video will remain off for all members of the public when speaking.
Telephone Participant Call the phone number listed on the Agenda. Enter the Webinar ID
followed by the # key. All callers are muted by default. If you wish to speak, “raise your hand” by
pressing *9 once. When you are called on by the host or presiding officer you will be un-muted. You
must state your first name and last name for the meeting record.
Email Input You may email public input between 8 am and 4 pm on the day of the meeting to
Xpenn.diaz@gmail.com. Please put “PUBLIC INPUT” and the meeting date in the subject line.
Emailed public comments labeled as such will be incorporated into the public meeting record, with
personal identifying information redacted. Copies of emails will be posted after the meeting minutes
have been approved.
Written Input Any member of the public may submit their comments addressed to the members of
the public body in writing. If a person wishes their written comments to be included in the record of
Public Input for the meeting, the writing should so state. Written comments must be received prior
to the closing of the meeting record (at the time of adjournment unless otherwise noted).
Verbal Input Protocol for Public Input is one of respect for the process, and respect for others.
Ridicule, obscene or profane language, lack of respect for others, and personal attacks are not
acceptable behavior. Public Input shall not be used to air personal grievances. Speakers should
address all comments to the public body as a whole and not to individual members or City staff.
Public comment shall be limited to no more than four (4) minutes per person. The Public Input
portion of the meeting shall total no more than one (1) hour, unless otherwise shortened or
extended by majority vote of the public body members present. The presiding officer or the city
clerk or their designee, shall monitor each speaker's use of time and shall notify the speaker when
the allotted time has expired. All public comments should be addressed to the public body as a
whole. A person may participate and provide Public Input once during a meeting and may not cede
time to another person, or split their time if Public Input is held at two (2) or more different times
during a meeting. The presiding officer may give priority to those persons who indicate they wish to
speak on an agenda item upon which a vote will be taken. The presiding officer or public body
members shall not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the public body members
shall be for clarification purposes only. Public Input shall not be used as Page 3 of 3 a time for
problem solving or reacting to comments made but, rather, for hearing citizens for informational
purposes only.
*In order to maintain reasonable decorum at a meeting, the presiding officer or any member of the
public body may call a speaker “out of order”. The presiding officer of the meeting shall have the
authority to provide a verbal warning to a speaker who uses abusive, harassing, threatening, or
defamatory language, or who engages in disorderly conduct that disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise
impedes the orderly conduct of a meeting. If the speaker refuses to cease such remarks or conduct
after being warned by the presiding officer, the presiding officer shall have the authority to mute the
speaker’s microphone and/or video presence at the meeting. The presiding officer will inform the
speaker that they may send the remainder of their remarks via email to the public body for inclusion
in the meeting record.
*Definitions of Types of Language and Conduct That May Warrant Verbal Warning:
“Abusive” means harsh, violent, profane, or derogatory language which would demean the dignity
of an individual or which is intended to humiliate, mock, insult or belittle an individual.
https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/abusive-language
“Harassing” means to annoy or bother someone in a constant or repeated way; to make repeated
attacks on another person. https://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/harass
“Threatening” means to say that you will harm someone or do something unpleasant or unwanted
especially in order to make someone do what you want.
https://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/threaten
“Defamatory” means a statement or communication that tends to harm a person's reputation by
subjecting the person to public contempt, disgrace, or ridicule, or by adversely affecting the person's
business. A statement that is likely to lower that person in the estimation of reasonable people and
in particular to cause that person to be regarded with feelings of hatred, contempt, ridicule, fear, or
dislike. Black's Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019)contempt, disgrace, or ridicule, or by adversely
affecting the person's business. A statement that is likely to lower that person in the estimation of
reasonable people and in particular to cause that person to be regarded with feelings of hatred,
contempt, ridicule, fear, or dislike. Black's Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019)
Citations that Authorize the Presiding Officer to Bar Offensive Language During Public
Comment:
The following citations provide the legal basis for adopting UCC Section 2-5(b)(1)(d) that allows the
presiding officer of a City Council, Committee of the Whole, or a City-sponsored board or
commission regulate “abusive, harassing, threatening, or defamatory language” during public
comment. The following Attorney General binding opinions and case law essentially classify abusive,
“harassing, threatening and defamatory language as “manner”, not “content”, of speech that can be
reasonably regulated under the First Amendment. UCC Section 2-5(c) (Ordinance No. 2020-09-049.
Attorney General binding opinion numbers 2019 PAC 59187, 2018 PAC 55462, 2016 PAC 45349;
Milestone v. City of Monroe, Wisconsin, 665 F.3d 774, 783-784 (7th Cir. 2011); Vega v. Chicago
Board of Education, 338 F.Supp.3d 806, 811 (N.D. Ill. 2018); Sandefur v. Vill. of Hanover Park, 862
F.Supp.2d 840, 847 (N.D. Ill. 2012); I.A. Rana Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Aurora, 630 F.Supp.2d
912, 920-923 (D.C. N.D. 2009).
Get email alerts for Urbana
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.