Public Works, Sewer and Water

CITY OF VERONA PUBLIC WORKS/SEWER & WATER COMMITTEE AGENDA MONDAY, February 26, 2023 5:30 P.M. VERONA CITY CENTER, ROOM D122 111 LINCOLN STREET VERONA, WI 53593 Agenda Items 1. Call to order. 2. Roll call. 3. Public Comment. 4. Approval of the minutes: January 22, 2024. 5. Discussion and Possible Action: Practical Alternatives Analysis (West Road Crossing) 6. Staff Report: a. Well #6 Packer Test Update 7. Adjourn. Evan Touchett Chairperson Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the members of the City Council or other standing committees of the City Council may be present at the meeting of the Public Works, Sewer & Water Committee to gather information about a subject over which they have decision-making responsibility. The City Council and any other standing committees will not take formal action at this meeting. POSTED: Verona City Hall Verona Library Miller’s Market ALL AGENDAS ARE POSTED ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT www.ci.verona.wi.us IF YOU NEED AN INTERPRETER, MATERIALS IN ALTERNATIVE FORMATS, OR OTHER ACCOMMODATION TO ACCESS THE MEETINGS, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY CLERK AT 845-6495 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRECEDING THE MEETING. EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST.  CITY OF VERONA PUBLIC WORKS/SEWER & WATER COMMITTEE MINUTES MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2023 6:00 P.M. VERONA CITY CENTER, ROOM D122 111 LINCOLN STREET VERONA, WI 53593 Agenda Items 1. Call to order: Meeting called to order by E. Touchett at 6:05pm. 2. Roll call: Evan Touchett, Mara Helmke, Beth Tucker Long. Also present: Adam Waszak, Interim Director of Public Works, Carla Fischer, AECOM. 3. 4. Public Comment: None. T 5. AF Approval of the minutes: December 11, 2023. Moved by B. Tucker Long and seconded by M. Helmke. Motion carried 3-0. Discussion and Possible Action: Stormwater Services Agreement (AECOM). Renewal of annual agreement with AECOM for a variety of SW Services. E. Touchett questioned if the D scope and estimated coast was similar to years past. A. Waszak confirmed. C. Fischer talked about the R success of private BMP inspection in 2023. Moved by E. Touchet and seconded by B. Tucker Long to recommend to Common Council the authorization of the 2024 Stormwater Services Agreement with AECOM, for a cost not to exceed $80,595. Motion carried 3-0. 6. Staff Report: None. 7. Adjourn: Motion to adjourn at 6:20pm by E. Touchett and seconded by B. Tucker Long. Motion carried 3-0. Evan Touchett Chairperson Notice is hereby given that a quorum of the members of the City Council or other standing committees of the City Council may be present at the meeting of the Public Works, Sewer & Water Committee to gather information about a  subject over which they have decision-making responsibility. The City Council and any other standing committees will not take formal action at this meeting. POSTED: Verona City Hall Verona Library Miller’s Market ALL AGENDAS ARE POSTED ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT www.ci.verona.wi.us IF YOU NEED AN INTERPRETER, MATERIALS IN ALTERNATIVE FORMATS, OR OTHER ACCOMMODATION TO ACCESS THE MEETINGS, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY CLERK AT 845-6495 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRECEDING THE MEETING. EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST. T AF DR  Meeting Date: February 26, 2024 PW/S&W Committee Memo Public Works/Sewer & Water Committee Listed below is an explanation of the items on the Public Works/Sewer & Water Committee agenda. Item (5) Practical Alternatives Analysis (West Road Crossing) As part of continued roadway design efforts to combat growing capacity concerns for key thoroughfares and connections on the City’s West side, a Practical Alternatives Analysis has been completed for a western crossing of the Sugar River. The Analysis explored a wide range of alternatives to address traffic related concerns. These alternatives are further discussed in the included West Road Crossing Alternatives Summary. Staff are seeking affirmation of support for the preferred alternative 3.2. Item (6.a.) Well #6 Packer Test Update Initial stages of the packer test have been completed. Staff will provide an update on initial findings and next steps in the process. Page 1 / 1  City of Verona Public Works Mee ng February 26, 2024 West Road Crossing Alterna ve Summary (Public Works Mee ng February 26, 2024) Project Background The purpose of the proposed West Road project is to address traffic growth, safety, and emerging and forecasted operational deficiencies on both US 18/151, between the W. Verona Avenue/Epic Lane and the County Trunk Highway (CTH) G/Dairy Ridge Road interchanges, and along CTH PD in the City and Town of Verona. Traffic has increased primarily due to the growth of Epic Systems Corporation (Epic), a large employer in Dane County with a campus located in the City of Verona, and, to a lesser extent, single and multi-family residential growth in the City of Verona. Verona is one of Wisconsin’s fastest growing communities (per US Census data, the population grew by over 30% between 2010 and 2020). With the forecasted growth at Epic and in the City of Verona, significant traffic congestion and safety concerns will occur if no changes are made to the transportation network. Therefore, there is a need for a robust solution that addresses both near-term and long-term growth in the area. As part of alternatives development process, the following criteria were developed to meet the purpose and need of the project: 1. Meets operational and safety requirements to handle near-term and long-term forecasted traffic (e.g. secondary access points) 2. Minimizes net environmental impacts (wetland, floodplain, Military Ridge State Trail (MRST)) while providing improved Sugar River access to the public (bike, pedestrians, kayak, trout fishing, etc.) 3. Consistent with the near-term and long-term growth plans in the region a. Based on Epic’s growth history, one important criterion to the City of Verona and Epic is that any new facility be publicly owned and be located to accommodate future growth without having to relocate a facility. Northern Lights Road was moved two times between 2005 and 2017, with additional expansion work occurring every couple of years, which causes disruption to City residents and Epic employees and is costly. 4. Minimize relocation of existing infrastructure (buildings, underground utilities, geothermal, solar fields, etc.) If no project occurs the existing two main Epic campus access points and Northern Lights Road will not have the capacity to handle the additional traffic resulting from near-term and long-term planned campus growth. Traffic analysis shows multiple failures at these locations: 1. US 18/151 & W Verona Ave/Epic Lane Interchange 2. CTH PD & Northern Lights Road intersection Page 1 of 4  City of Verona Public Works Mee ng February 26, 2024 Alternative Analysis A wide range of alternatives were developed to address the traffic problems of the area. Here is the list of alternatives and associated exhibits:  Alternative 0 – No Build  Alternative 1 – West Verona Ave Interchange (Exhibit 1)  Alternative 2 – (Exhibit 2-1)  Alternative 3.1 – (Exhibits 3.1-1)  Alternative 3.2 – (Exhibits 3.2-1 through 3.2-5)  Alternative 3.3 – (Exhibits 3.3-1)  Alternative 4 – (Exhibit 4)  Alternative 5 – (Exhibit 5) Alternative Discussion Alternative 0 is a “no build” alternative, which does not fulfill the purpose and need of the project. In a no build scenario, the number of Epic employees will continue to grow, and traffic volumes and safety issues will continue to worsen. The existing access points (US 18/151 and CTH PD) and Northern Lights Road cannot handle the additional traffic to Campuses 6 and 7 and potential future campuses. Alternative 1 is a concept to expand the West Verona Avenue interchange, which would avoid the wetland impacts west of the Epic campus. Even with the significant improvements shown in Alternative 1, this alternative would not have the traffic capacity to address the volumes associated with the current and projected campus growth. Alternative 2 does not meet the project purpose and need as previously described. This alternative has access or transportation concerns related to separating future campus developments from the existing campus. It doesn’t accommodate future traffic goals and doesn’t create the separation between public roads and lower speed private roads. Having a public street split the Epic site would cause inefficiencies and safety issues for staff moving between campuses and unsafe conditions for staff walking or biking between campuses across the busy public street. There is significant pedestrian traffic on campus with over 11,000 employees on site each day. Alternative 1 does provide a more direct connection to campus 6 and 7. without significantly re-routing. However, a four-lane publicly owned arterial splitting the campus would not align with the Epic Campus master planning. This alternative would not allow Epic to maximize their property for future growth and would create a public roadway within a private campus. Alternative 3.1 meets the purpose and need of the project by accommodating both current and future traffic and is consistent with future plans. Alternatives 3.2 and 3.3 are slight variations and were developed after the wetland delineation survey was completed to help further minimize/reduce wetland impacts. Alternative 3.2 has the least amount of wetland impacts between 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3. Alternative 3.2 is discussed in further detail under the recommended alternative section. Alternatives 4 and 5 were other alternatives considered but were found to not meet the purpose and need of the project. Alternative 4 does not require a new crossing location across the MRST or the Sugar River. The concept uses an improved existing roadway network (e.g., Dairy Ridge, White Crossing Road, CTH PD) including a new White Crossing structure over the Sugar River. This alternative would introduce approximately 4 miles of additional travel distance for traffic trying to access the Epic site. Alternative 5 would split the existing campuses from future campuses thus creating concerns with mixing higher speed public roads with private roads and heavy pedestrian movements. Most importantly both Alternative 4 and Alternative 5 would require additional travel distance to access Campuses 6 and 7. This additional travel Page 2 of 4  City of Verona Public Works Mee ng February 26, 2024 time would not attract enough users to address the traffic operations and safety issues created by expected traffic growth. A summary of the wetland impacts and purpose and need criteria for each Alternative is provided in Table 1 below. Table 1 - Roadway Crossing Impacts Wetland Impacts (Acres) Purpose and Need Criteria Temporary Permanent Meet Criteria 1 Criteria 2 Criteria Alter. Non- Non- Criteria 3 Purpose Ruderal Total Ruderal Total (Access) (Environmental 4 # Ruderal Ruderal (Growth) and Impacts) (Relocation) Need 0 No Wetland Impacts No Yes No Yes No 1 No Wetland Impacts No Yes No Yes No 2 0.02 2.16 2.18 0.07 10.64 10.71 Yes No No Yes No 3.1 1.19 0.81 2.00 4.02 6.30 10.32 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.2 0.24 2.06 2.30 1.59 8.19 9.78 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.3 0.46 2.13 2.59 1.80 8.13 9.93 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4 Does not meet purpose and need. Alternative 2 provides a more direct route. 5 Does not meet purpose and need. Alternative 2 provides a more direct route. Cost Overall costs, including construction and maintenance, were developed for Alternatives 2, 3.2, and 3.3. An alternative cost comparison was completed for a pre-cast arch crossing option for each remaining alternative. The City of Verona, the eventual owner of this roadway and structure, prefers options that lower the long-term maintenance costs of the structure. Table 2 - Alternative Roadway Crossing Cost Comparison Roadway Structure Meets Maintenance Alternative # Construction Construction Overall Cost* Purpose / Cost (75-year) Cost Cost Need? 2 $66M $20M $6M $92M No 3.2 $88M $23M $6M $117M Yes 3.3 $94M $26M $6M $126M Yes *Costs do not include stream realignment or utility cost The overall cost of Alternative 3.2 is less than Alternative 3.3 and both meet the purpose and need. An additional cost analysis for Alternative 3.2 was completed to compare the cost between the pre-cast arch versus a bridge option as seen in Table 3. Please see Figure 1 for graphic view of the precast arch layout. Page 3 of 4  City of Verona Public Works Mee ng February 26, 2024 Table 3 – Precast Arch versus Bridge Cost for Alternative 3.2 Roadway Structure Maintenance Type Construction Construction Overall Cost Cost (75-year) Cost Cost Precast Arch $88M $23M $6M $117M Bridge $88M $15M $31M $134M Figure 1 - Precast Arch Graphic The construction cost of the bridge is lower than the precast arch option. However, the long-term maintenance cost of the bridge option is much more significant than the precast, arch resulting in the precast arch being the more economical option overall. Preferred Alternative The preferred Alternative 3.2 meets the purpose and need of the project. It minimizes non-ruderal wetland impacts to the extent practicable, provides the secondary access point via US 18/151 and CTH PD required to meet the near and long-term growth in the area, creates a safe transportation network for all modes of traffic, while also preserving Epic’s ability to safely grow without public thoroughfare splitting campuses. Alternative 3.2 crossing of the Sugar River and MRST was chosen after an iterative process to reduce the quantity and quality of wetland impacts. Other items included for the preferred alternative: Alternative 3.2 provides the opportunity for further enhancements to the Sugar River such as a stream alignment to improve the character and quality of the Sugar River. Enhancements also include improved public access will be provided to both the Sugar River and the MRST. Accommodations for planned and future utilities will be included in this project. This will minimize the need for future crossings of the Sugar River, minimizing impacts to wetlands and floodplain. The City of Verona will be the owner of the new road and structure. The City considered both the cost of the improvements and the cost of future maintenance when selecting the precast arch option as the preferred type of structure. While being functional to convey large flooding events, the arch bridge will provide a visually appealing profile to adjacent landowners and users of the Sugar River and MRST. Page 4 of 4  ALTERNATIVE 1 WEST VERONA AVE INTERCHANGE ERN EXHIBIT 1 RTH NO LIG HT S RD MILI ES SB/EB BRIDGE RIDG RY TA NB TUNNEL TA TE E PIC LN CITY OF VERONA AI SB/EB TUNNEL TR L W VERONA AVE USH 18/151 R IVE AR R SU G SB/EB BRIDGE AIL ATE TR DG E ST Y RI ITAR MIL US H1 8/1 51  EPIC FACILITIES ALTERNATIVE 2 CURRENTLY IN USE EXHIBIT 2-1 EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) ZONE A FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) SU R GA RI SUGAR RIVER CROSSING VE (BRIDGE OR PRECAST ARCH) R WETLAND IMPACT AREA DAIRY RIDGE RD M ILI TA RY RI E DG ST AT ET RA IL NOTE: RUDERAL AREAS ARE CROSS HATCHED SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA WETLAND IMPACTS - ROADWAY CROSSING QUALITY PERMANENT TEMP IMPACT PERM PERM TEMP TEMP COLOR IMPACT TOTAL TOTAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL WET PRAIRIE 0.07 ACRES 0.01 ACRES -- 0.07 ACRES -- 0.01 ACRES SEDGE MEADOW -- 0.01 ACRES -- -- -- 0.01 ACRES WET MEADOW 4.93 ACRES 1.98 ACRES 4.93 ACRES -- 1.98 ACRES -- EPIC LN SHALLOW MARSH 0.05 ACRES -- 0.05 ACRES -- -- -- SHRUB CARR 0.34 ACRES 0.13 ACRES 0.34 ACRES -- 0.13 ACRES -- HARDWOOD -- -- -- -- -- -- SWAMP USH 18/151 FARMED WET 5.32 ACRES 0.05 ACRES 5.32 ACRES -- 0.05 ACRES -- MEADOW TOTAL 10.71 ACRES 2.18 ACRES 10.64 ACRES 0.07 ACRES 2.16 ACRES 0.02 ACRES  EPIC FACILITIES ALTERNATIVE 3.1 CURRENTLY IN USE EXHIBIT 3.1-1 STREAM ACCESS PARKING AND WALKING PATH WETLAND IMPACT AREA EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) SUGAR RIVER CROSSING ZONE A FEMA 100-YR (BRIDGE OR PRECAST ARCH) FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) SU GA R RIVE R DAIRY RIDGE RD M ILI TA RY RI E DG ST AT ET RA IL NOTE: RUDERAL AREAS ARE CROSS HATCHED SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA WETLAND IMPACTS - ROADWAY CROSSING QUALITY PERMANENT TEMP IMPACT PERM PERM TEMP TEMP COLOR IMPACT TOTAL TOTAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL WET PRAIRIE -- 0.01 ACRES -- -- -- 0.01 ACRES SEDGE MEADOW 2.38 ACRES 0.65 ACRES -- 2.38 ACRES -- 0.65 ACRES WET MEADOW 4.58 ACRES 0.81 ACRES 4.58 ACRES -- 0.80 ACRES 0.01 ACRES EPIC LN SHALLOW MARSH 1.49 ACRES 0.06 ACRES 0.31 ACRES 1.18 ACRES -- 0.06 ACRES SHRUB CARR 0.51 ACRES 0.47 ACRES 0.05 ACRES 0.46 ACRES 0.01 ACRES 0.46 ACRES HARDWOOD -- -- -- -- -- -- SWAMP USH 18/151 FARMED WET 1.36 ACRES -- 1.36 ACRES -- -- -- MEADOW TOTAL 10.32 ACRES 2.00 ACRES 6.30 ACRES 4.02 ACRES 0.81 ACRES 1.19 ACRES  EPIC FACILITIES ALTERNATIVE 3.2 CURRENTLY IN USE EXHIBIT 3.2-1 SUGAR RIVER CROSSING (BRIDGE OR PRECAST ARCH) STREAM ACCESS PARKING AND WALKING PATH STORMWATER EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) POND (TYP.) W PED / BICYCLE ACCESS W PATH TO MILITARY W RIDGE STATE TRAIL WETLAND IMPACT AREA ZONE A FEMA 100-YR ROADWAY CROSSING FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) SU PUBLIC UTILITY GA NORTHERN CROSSING R ''-''-WF S - STEEL PIPE CASING RIVE 1210 SEE EXHIBIT 3.2-5 R PROPOSED STREAM ''-''-WF S 1120 REALIGNMENT & RESTORATION S ''- -WF 1120'' S ''--WF 1120'' DAIRY RIDGE RD FS ''--W 1120'' PUBLIC UTILITY SOUTHERN CROSSING - STEEL PIPE CASING M STREAM ILI REALIGNMENT / TA PUBLIC UTILITY RY IMPACT OVERLAP RI E DG ST AT ET RA IL NOTE: RUDERAL AREAS ARE CROSS HATCHED SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA WETLAND IMPACTS - ROADWAY CROSSING QUALITY PERMANENT TEMP IMPACT PERM PERM TEMP TEMP COLOR IMPACT TOTAL TOTAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL WET PRAIRIE -- -- -- -- -- -- SEDGE MEADOW 0.99 ACRES 0.24 ACRES -- 0.99 ACRES -- 0.24 ACRES WET MEADOW 4.42 ACRES 1.67 ACRES 3.82 ACRES 0.60 ACRES 1.67 ACRES -- EPIC LN SHALLOW MARSH 0.63 ACRES 0.07 ACRES 0.63 ACRES -- 0.07 ACRES -- SHRUB CARR 2.52 ACRES 0.32 ACRES 2.52 ACRES -- 0.32 ACRES -- HARDWOOD -- -- -- -- -- -- SWAMP USH 18/151 FARMED WET 1.22 ACRES -- 1.22 ACRES -- -- -- MEADOW TOTAL 9.78 ACRES 2.30 ACRES 8.19 ACRES 1.59 ACRES 2.06 ACRES 0.24 ACRES  ALTERNATIVE 3.2 EPIC FACILITIES CURRENTLY IN USE EXHIBIT 3.2-2 ROADWAY CROSSING SUGAR RIVER CROSSING (BRIDGE OR PRECAST ARCH) STREAM ACCESS PARKING AND WALKING PATH STORMWATER EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) POND (TYP.) W PED / BICYCLE ACCESS W PATH TO MILITARY W RIDGE STATE TRAIL WETLAND IMPACT AREA ZONE A FEMA 100-YR ROADWAY CROSSING FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) SU PUBLIC UTILITY GA NORTHERN CROSSING R ''-''-WF S - STEEL PIPE CASING RIVE 1210 SEE EXHIBIT 3.2-5 R S ''-''-WF 1120 S ''- -WF 1120'' S ''--WF 1120'' DAIRY RIDGE RD FS ''--W 1120'' M ILI TA RY RI E DG ST AT ET RA IL NOTE: RUDERAL AREAS ARE CROSS HATCHED SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA WETLAND IMPACTS - ROADWAY CROSSING QUALITY PERMANENT TEMP IMPACT PERM PERM TEMP TEMP COLOR IMPACT TOTAL TOTAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL WET PRAIRIE -- -- -- -- -- -- SEDGE MEADOW 0.99 ACRES 0.24 ACRES -- 0.99 ACRES -- 0.24 ACRES WET MEADOW 4.42 ACRES 1.67 ACRES 3.82 ACRES 0.60 ACRES 1.67 ACRES -- EPIC LN SHALLOW MARSH 0.63 ACRES 0.07 ACRES 0.63 ACRES -- 0.07 ACRES -- SHRUB CARR 2.52 ACRES 0.32 ACRES 2.52 ACRES -- 0.32 ACRES -- HARDWOOD -- -- -- -- -- -- SWAMP USH 18/151 FARMED WET 1.22 ACRES -- 1.22 ACRES -- -- -- MEADOW TOTAL 9.78 ACRES 2.30 ACRES 8.19 ACRES 1.59 ACRES 2.06 ACRES 0.24 ACRES  ALTERNATIVE 3.2 EPIC FACILITIES CURRENTLY IN USE EXHIBIT 3.2-3 STREAM RESTORATION STREAM ACCESS PARKING AND WALKING PATH STORMWATER EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) POND (TYP.) ZONE A FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) STREAM REALIGNMENT / SU ROADWAY CROSSING GA IMPACT OVERLAP R S ''-''-WF RIVE 1210 R PROPOSED STREAM ''-''-WF S 1120 REALIGNMENT & RESTORATION S ''- -WF 1120'' S ''--WF 1120'' TEMPORARY IMPACT DAIRY RIDGE RD AREAS DURING FS ''--W 1120'' RESTORATION M ILI TA CONNECT INTO RY EXISTING SUGAR RIVER RI E DG ST PROPOSED AT ROADWAY ET ALIGNMENT RA IL SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA EPIC LN STREAM RESTORATION TEMPORARY IMPACT DURING RESTORATION USH 18/151 3.70 ACRES 14.52 ACRES  ALTERNATIVE 3.2 EPIC FACILITIES CURRENTLY IN USE EXHIBIT 3.2-4 SOUTHERN UTILITY CROSSING STREAM ACCESS PARKING AND WALKING PATH STORMWATER EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) POND (TYP.) ZONE A FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) SU GA R S ''-''-WF RIVE 1210 R PROPOSED STREAM ''-''-WF S 1120 REALIGNMENT & RESTORATION S ''- -WF 1120'' S ''--WF 1120'' DAIRY RIDGE RD FS ''--W 1120'' PUBLIC UTILITY SOUTHERN CROSSING - STEEL PIPE CASING M STREAM ILI REALIGNMENT / TA PUBLIC UTILITY RY IMPACT OVERLAP RI E DG ST PROPOSED AT ROADWAY ET ALIGNMENT RA IL SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA NOTE: RUDERAL AREAS ARE CROSS HATCHED WETLAND IMPACTS - SOUTHERN UTILITY CROSSING IMPACT TEMP TEMP EPIC LN COLOR QUALITY TOTAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL WET PRAIRIE 0.01 ACRES -- 0.01 ACRES WET MEADOW 1.06 ACRES 1.06 ACRES -- SHRUB CARR 0.02 ACRES 0.02 ACRES -- USH 18/151 FARMED WET 0.46 ACRES 0.46 ACRES -- MEADOW TOTAL 1.55 ACRES 1.54 ACRES 0.01 ACRES  ALTERNATIVE 3.2 EXHIBIT 3.2-5 SUGAR RIVER SUGAR RIVER CROSSING (BRIDGE OR PRECAST ARCH) STREAM ACCESS PARKING AND WALKING PATH W PED / BICYCLE ACCESS W PATH TO MILITARY W RIDGE STATE TRAIL W W W WETLAND IMPACT AREA W ROADWAY CROSSING W W W W M W ILI RY W TA RI W DG W ES TA TE PUBLIC UTILITY TR AI NORTHERN CROSSING L - STEEL PIPE CASING STORMWATER POND (TYP.) PROPOSED STREAM NOTE: RUDERAL AREAS ARE CROSS HATCHED REALIGNMENT & RESTORATION WETLAND IMPACTS - ROADWAY CROSSING QUALITY PERMANENT TEMP IMPACT PERM PERM TEMP TEMP COLOR IMPACT TOTAL TOTAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL WET PRAIRIE -- -- -- -- -- -- SEDGE MEADOW 0.99 ACRES 0.24 ACRES -- 0.99 ACRES -- 0.24 ACRES WET MEADOW 4.42 ACRES 1.67 ACRES 3.82 ACRES 0.60 ACRES 1.67 ACRES -- SHALLOW MARSH 0.63 ACRES 0.07 ACRES 0.63 ACRES -- 0.07 ACRES -- SHRUB CARR 2.52 ACRES 0.32 ACRES 2.52 ACRES -- 0.32 ACRES -- HARDWOOD -- -- -- -- -- -- SWAMP FARMED WET 1.22 ACRES -- 1.22 ACRES -- -- -- MEADOW TOTAL 9.78 ACRES 2.30 ACRES 8.19 ACRES 1.59 ACRES 2.06 ACRES 0.24 ACRES  EPIC FACILITIES ALTERNATIVE 3.3 CURRENTLY IN USE EXHIBIT 3.3-1 SUGAR RIVER CROSSING (BRIDGE OR PRECAST ARCH) EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) WETLAND IMPACT AREA ZONE A FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) SU GA R RIVE R DAIRY RIDGE RD M ILI TA RY RI E DG ST AT ET RA IL NOTE: RUDERAL AREAS ARE CROSS HATCHED SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA WETLAND IMPACTS - ROADWAY CROSSING QUALITY PERMANENT TEMP IMPACT PERM PERM TEMP TEMP COLOR IMPACT TOTAL TOTAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL RUDERAL NON-RUDERAL WET PRAIRIE -- -- -- -- -- -- SEDGE MEADOW 1.19 ACRES 0.44 ACRES -- 1.19 ACRES -- 0.44 ACRES WET MEADOW 4.50 ACRES 1.99 ACRES 3.89 ACRES 0.61 ACRES 1.99 ACRES -- EPIC LN SHALLOW MARSH 0.30 ACRES -- 0.30 ACRES -- -- -- SHRUB CARR 2.34 ACRES 0.16 ACRES 2.34 ACRES -- 0.14 ACRES 0.02 ACRES HARDWOOD -- -- -- -- -- -- SWAMP USH 18/151 FARMED WET 1.60 ACRES -- 1.60 ACRES -- -- -- MEADOW TOTAL 9.93 ACRES 2.59 ACRES 8.13 ACRES 1.80 ACRES 2.13 ACRES 0.46 ACRES  ONLY ALTERNATIVE 4 ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY EXHIBIT 4 ONLY ONLY CTH PD ZONE AE FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) COUNTRY VIEW RD SU R GA D RI OA VER GR SIN OS CR TE WHI ZONE A FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) M ILITA R RY ID G ES TA TE TR AI L DAIRY RIDGE RD USH 18/151 ALTERNATIVE 5 EXHIBIT 5 ZONE A FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.) AY M YW D ILK RI M RY TA SUGAR RIVER WILDLIFE AREA ILI EPIC OWNED PARCELS (TYP.) GE ST AT BOBCAT LANE ET RA IL GA SUR RIVE R EP IC LN SUGAR RIVER CROSSING MILITARY RIDGE STATE TRAIL CROSSING USH 18/151 CTH G ZONE AE FEMA 100-YR FLOODPLAIN (TYP.)