Town Council Regular Meeting
Regular MeetingWarrenton, VA · March 14, 2023
Minutes
The Town of Warrenton
P.O. Box 341
Warrenton, VA 20188
P (540) 347-1101
F (540) 349-2414
March 14, 2023. Regular Town Council Meeting
Minutes
Attachment 1: Handouts to Council from Citizen’s
time. March 14th, 2023
The Town of Warrenton
P.O. Box 341
Warrenton, VA 20188
P (540) 347-1101
F (540) 349-2414
March 14, 2023. Regular Town Council Meeting
Minutes
Attachment 2: Citizen Comment Emails and form
submissions.
From: "noreply@civicplus.com" on behalf of "noreply@civicplus.com"
<noreply@civicplus.com>
Sent: 14 Feb 2023 16:29:34 0600
To: """ <lpaul@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Public Comment
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Public Comment
Name Ellen Zagrobelny
Address 10120 Brown Moore Lane
City Marshall
State VA
Zip Code 20115
Email Address
Phone Number
Committee, Board, or Town Council
Commission Type
Agenda Item Amazon Web Services SUP Application
Comment I write regarding the special use permit application you will be
voting on.
I’m a Civil Engineer, and I review site construction plans and
permit applications. I gave the SUP application in question a
read, and I found it to be an incomplete application.
In my experience, it is incomplete to an extent that would be
unusual for approval in a large-scale project such as this one.
Now we know in a special use the burden of proof is really on
the applicant to provide a thorough analysis of the downsides
and compelling reasons why they should receive an exception.
This is what the Statement of Justification in this permit is for.
But this Statement of Justification fails to provide the requested
analysis.
There are sixteen criteria here to be addressed. In my
judgment, the applicant did adequately discuss and analyze 6
of the 16 criteria. But the remaining 10 either are avoided or the
responses have not stood up to closer examination.
Let’s take the environmental impact for one example… This is
criteria 10 and 16
“10. Whether the proposed Special Use Permit at the specified
location will result in the preservation or destruction, loss or
damage of any significant topographic or physical, natural,
scenic, archaeological or historic feature.
16. The effect of the proposed Special Use Permit on
environmentally sensitive land or natural features, wildlife habit
and vegetation, water quality, and air quality.”
In the initial submittal, the Applicant responds “In 2020, the
Applicant became the world’s largest purchaser of renewable
energy. It’s facilities are almost 4 times as energy efficient as
other enterprise data centers etc etc” it goes on like that
In my judgment, that response does not adequately address
the environmental impact. How could it? Similar comments can
be made about the 8 other criteria. What improvements the
application has, have essentially been made at the direction
and demand of the citizens.
The Planning Commission and the citizens have spent the last
few months essentially doing the Applicant’s work for them -
providing analysis, addressing the tough questions, quality
controlling studies, developing feasibility options, even
correcting typos and topographic errors.
This application, even as it stands now, is in my judgment not
thorough or complete enough to move forward.
You would be right to vote no.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
From: "noreply@civicplus.com" on behalf of "noreply@civicplus.com"
<noreply@civicplus.com>
Sent: 14 Feb 2023 17:19:09 0600
To: """ <lpaul@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Public Comment
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Public Comment
Name Taryn Meeks
Address 175 Waterloo St
City Warrenton
State VA
Zip Code 20186
Email Address
Phone Number
Committee, Board, or Town Council
Commission Type
Agenda Item Amazon
Comment Hello,
I recently moved to Old Town Warrenton. I'm not able to attend
the town council meeting tonight but wanted to make my voice
heard. I oppose Amazon and the power towers. I do not want
to see Warrenton turn into Arlington or another hub of endless
buildings. Please save this lovely town!
Sincerely Taryn Meeks
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
From: "noreply@civicplus.com" on behalf of "noreply@civicplus.com"
<noreply@civicplus.com>
Sent: 16 Feb 2023 06:32:19 0600
To: """ <lpaul@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Public Comment
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Public Comment
Name Charlie Keith
Address 140 Morningside Drive
City Culpeper
State VA
Zip Code 22701
Email Address
Phone Number
Committee, Board, or Town Council
Commission Type
Agenda Item Thank You
Comment Regarding the data center permit, thank you for your
courageous vote to bring some growth and revenue to
Warrenton. Doing what is right is not always popular, and I was
truly impressed by your professionalism and courage in the
midst of resistance. Many of us who welcome bridled growth,
such as this permit, fail to see how a possibly slightly humming
data center would bring about noise pollution next to an
existing highway--an absurd position to take in my opinion.
Again, thank you and keep up the great work in keeping
Warrenton unique and thriving at the same time.
-Charlie Keith
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
From: "noreply@civicplus.com" on behalf of "noreply@civicplus.com"
<noreply@civicplus.com>
Sent: 17 Feb 2023 11:34:27 0600
To: """ <lpaul@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Online Form Submittal: Public Comment
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Public Comment
Name Jeff Bezos
Address 100 Prime Way
City Amazonville
State VA
Zip Code 33221
Email Address Onthetake@warrenton.gov
Phone Number 000-000-1111
Committee, Board, or Town Council
Commission Type
Agenda Item Amazon
Comment There is no doubt in my mind all of you who voted for this data
center are on the take.
Shame on all of you.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
From: "Tom deButts" < >
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:17:20 +0000 (UTC)
To: """ <citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Warrenton Data Center
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
I am writing to urge the Council to decline the request to approve the massive data
center in town due to the noise and vibration that will be caused by the center. The
noise will be a permanent loss of the quiet that is a part of Warrenton and once lost,
cannot be regained. Approval of this proposal will permanently change Warrenton’s
small-town appeal and Fauquier County’s rural character, and significant noise and
visual impacts will affect citizens and visitors alike. Citizens and visitors arriving from the
East will be greeted by a fifty-foot-high building on an elevated site, right at the eastern
entry to Warrenton. The data center and power lines will be visible from many parts of
both Warrenton itself and the surrounding countryside.
If any members have not physically visited the Ashburn data alley, they may not
appreciate the gravity of this decision.
Please don't sell out the town for such a short-term financial gain at the expense of the
town, its quiet nature, and its residents.
Thomas M. deButts
1415 Snowden Road
Delaplane, VA 20144
�
From: "Mark Head" < >
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:19:16 0500
To: """ <citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Hi �
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Too late to submit an email
Comment for tonight’s hearing ?
Tks
Mark Head, MD
Airlie
Sent from my iPhone
From: "Mark Head" < >
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:44:58 0500
To: "citizencomment" <citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Cc: "wm" < >
Subject: Re: Automatic reply: Hi �
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Tks
The comment comes from an old friend and expert in Electromagnetic Field
effects on biological systems: Prof Wilhelm
Mosgoeller, currently giving expert testimony in a class action lawsuit at District
Superior Ct in D.C.
Willi will write with my blessing directly to you. I’ve long followed his work &
endorse it
Cheers
MMH
Mark Head, MD
Airlie
On Feb 14, 2023, at 1:19 PM, citizencomment
<citizencomment@warrentonva.gov> wrote:
Thank you for your email, while there is no guarantee your comment will be
read aloud please know it will be part of the minutes.
Town of Warrenton
From: "Mark Head" < >
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:28:57 0500
To: "citizencomment" <citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Re: Automatic reply: Hi �
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Prof Mosgoeller’s missive is on its way ! Hope someone is in the office to retrieve
it, should it seem a good idea to read aloud tonight.
It will be a general statement only.
MMH
On Feb 14, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Mark Head <tunedoctor@me.com>
wrote:
Tks
The comment comes from an old friend and expert in Electromagnetic
Field effects on biological systems: Prof Wilhelm
Mosgoeller, currently giving expert testimony in a class action lawsuit
at District Superior Ct in D.C.
Willi will write with my blessing directly to you. I’ve long followed his
work & endorse it
Cheers
MMH
Mark Head, MD
Airlie
On Feb 14, 2023, at 1:19 PM, citizencomment
<citizencomment@warrentonva.gov> wrote:
Thank you for your email, while there is no guarantee your
comment will be read aloud please know it will be part of the
minutes.
Town of Warrenton
From: "Mark Head" < >
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:46:02 0500
To: "citizencomment" <citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Automatic reply: Hi �
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
FYI:
From: wm < >
Date: February 14, 2023 at 4:36:56 PM EST
To: Mark Head < >
Subject: Re: Automatic reply: Hi �
Hi Mark
To write a statement I should know the situation.
Is the situation like the following: A company plans to built a huge
sth. which will increase the residents permanent (day and night, 7
days /week ) exposure to EMF (electromagnetic fields).
In short:
The project will (or may) increase the risks associated with EMF in the
low frequency range (50 60 Hz, powersupply). Possibly EMF in the
high frequency range (telecommunication, data exchange)by
radiofrequencies) is also on the list.
In the USA the environmental immissions from EMF appliances are
limited. Official safety standards are issued by the so called IEEE (I
triple E). Typically citizens are concerned because high voltage
powerlines can increase the environmental field exposure, while the
official safety limits for EMF field exposure do not protect for diseases
associated with long term exposure. There are ways to minimize EMF
Imissions (from high voltage power lines and reduce associated risks
by specific arrangement of the electric wires. I recommend to consider
environmental field reduction allready in the planning phase better
safe than sorry.
Willy Mosgoeller
Am 14.02.2023 um 19:44 schrieb Mark Head:
Tks
The comment comes from an old friend and expert in
Electromagnetic Field effects on biological systems: Prof
Wilhelm
Mosgoeller, currently giving expert testimony in a class
action lawsuit at District Superior Ct in D.C.
Willi will write with my blessing directly to you. I’ve long
followed his work & endorse it
Cheers
MMH
Mark Head, MD
Airlie
On Feb 14, 2023, at 1:19 PM, citizencomment
<citizencomment@warrentonva.gov> wrote:
Thank you for your email, while there is no guarantee
your comment will be read aloud please know it will be
part of the minutes.
Town of Warrenton
--
-------
SCIgenia Science Support GmbH - International Project-Design & Management
Email:
Tel.:
Web:
Büro: Rögergasse 32/18, 1090 Wien Austria
Firmensitz: Hahngasse 16/14, 1090 Wien
CEO: Annelie Engels,
FN 323636 k, HG Wien , VAT-ID: ATU 64857033
This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it (including
attachments) by mistake, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this
message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message
in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
From: "Ellen Zagrobelny" < >
Sent: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:26:55 0500
To: """ <citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Citizen Comment for 2/14
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
Dear Town Council, It was my intent to speak this evening as part of the public
comments. A sudden illness keeps me from doing so. While it is very last-minute, I
hope these comments can be included in the record. Below is my prepared comment.
Regards,
Ellen Zagrobelny
I’m going to speak to you about the special use permit application you will be voting
on.
I’m a Civil Engineer, and I review site construction plans and permit applications. I gave
the SUP application in question a read, and I found it to be an incomplete application.
In my experience, it is incomplete to an extent that would be unusual for approval in a
large-scale project such as this one.
Now we know in a special use the burden of proof is really on the applicant to provide a
thorough analysis of the downsides and compelling reasons why they should receive an
exception. This is what the Statement of Justification in this permit is for. But this
Statement of Justification fails to provide the requested analysis.
There are sixteen criteria here to be addressed. In my judgment, the applicant did
adequately discuss and analyze 6 of the 16 criteria. But the remaining 10 either are
avoided or the responses have not stood up to closer examination.
Let’s take the environmental impact for one example… This is criteria 10 and 16
“10. Whether the proposed Special Use Permit at the specified location will result in the
preservation or destruction, loss or damage of any significant topographic or physical,
natural, scenic, archaeological or historic feature.
16. The effect of the proposed Special Use Permit on environmentally sensitive land or
natural features, wildlife habit and vegetation, water quality, and air quality.”
In the initial submittal, the Applicant responds “In 2020, the Applicant became the
world’s largest purchaser of renewable energy. It’s facilities are almost 4 times as
energy efficient as other enterprise data centers etc etc” it goes on like that
In my judgment, that response does not adequately address the environmental
impact. How could it? Similar comments can be made about the 8 other criteria. What
improvements the application has, have essentially been made at the direction and
demand of the citizens.
The Planning Commission and the citizens have spent the last few months essentially
doing the Applicant’s work for them -
providing analysis, addressing the tough questions, quality controlling studies,
developing feasibility options, even correcting typos and topographic errors.
This application, even as it stands now, is in my judgment not thorough or complete
enough to move forward.
You would be right to vote no.
From: "Stephen Clough" <sclough@warrentonva.gov>
Sent: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:30:19 +0000
To: "citizencomment" <citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: FW: Please Deny the Amazon Data Center Special Use Permit:
Stephen Clough
Town Clerk, FOIA Officer
Town of Warrenton, VA
21 Main Street
Warrenton, VA 20186
M: (540)-714-9270
warrentonva.gov
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message is intended to be viewed only by the individual or entity to
whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited without the
permission of the sender. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or if you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message and
any copies of it from your computer system.
-----Original Message-----
From: Denise Harris <dharris@warrentonva.gov>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 11:35 AM
To: Stephen Clough <sclough@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: FW: Please Deny the Amazon Data Center Special Use Permit:
FYI - for your records.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Walton <rwalton@warrentonva.gov>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 10:03 AM
To: Denise Harris <dharris@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: FW: Please Deny the Amazon Data Center Special Use Permit:
Just an FYI. This was received around midnight this past Wednesday.
-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 12:12 AM
To: Rob Walton <rwalton@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: Please Deny the Amazon Data Center Special Use Permit:
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Dear Director of Community Development Rob Walton,
THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT SHOULD BE APPROVED. THE COUNCIL SHOULD BE DECIDING THE
FUTURE PATH OF WARRENTON AND SINCE IT HAS A NEGLIGIBLE EFFECT ON HISTORIC
WARRENTON THE COUNSEL SHOULD OBVIOUSLY APPROVE THE PERMIT ON THE BASES THAT IN
ORDER TO HAVE A HISTORY TO PRESERVE, ONE MUST ACCEPT HOW HISTORY IS MADE.
THIS APPROVAL WOULD BE HISTORICAL AND THE LOCATION IS PERFECT.
Sincerely,
Nicholas Allen
10476 Shortcut Rd Catlett, VA 20119-2444
From: "Michael Bruck" < >
Sent: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 15:09:47 +0000
To: "citizencomment@warrentonva.gov"
<citizencomment@warrentonva.gov>
Subject: SUP 2022 03 data center vote and maladministration liability
Attachments: The community recognizes only as invalid and unrepresentative
of the will of the community the Town Council.docx
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
The Town of Warrenton
P.O. Box 341
Warrenton, VA 20188
P (540) 347-1101
F (540) 349-2414
March 14, 2023. Regular Town Council Meeting
Minutes
Attachment 3: Signed Legislation
Agenda
TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
21 Main Street
Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:00 AM
AGENDA
Possible additions to the agenda and related materials are not set forth herein.
Times set forth are approximate and may be adjusted as necessary.
I. WORKSESSION - 9:00 AM
A. Closed Session
B. Lease Franchise Agreements
1. Glo Fiber
2. Water Tower
C. Ordinance Changes-
1. Recorder Appointment Designated the Responsibility of the Town Manager
2. Indemnification of Town Employees
D. Town / County Liaison Update
E. Town Council Handbook
1. Rules of Procedure
2. Ethics Statement
3. Boards committees commissions
4. Work Session Meeting Dates
F. Agenda Review
II. REGULAR MEETING - 6:30 PM
1. Swearing in Ceremony for Chief Carter 6:00 PM
A. INVOCATION.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
C. CITIZEN'S TIME.
D. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA.
E. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
1. Lease-Franchise Agreement Glo Fiber
2. Lease-Franchise Agreement Water Tower
3. Indemnification of Town Employees
4. Recorder Appointment Designated the Responsibility of the Town Manager
F. CONSENT AGENDA.
G. NEW BUSINESS.
1. Opioid Settlement
2. Acting Town Manager Extension
3. Town Recorder Appointment
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS.
I. TOWN ATTORNEY'S REPORT.
J. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT.
K. COUNCILMEMBERS TIME.
L. ADJOURNMENT.
Get email alerts for Warrenton
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.