Planning Commission Mtg

Mayor Kenneth Romney WEST BOUNTIFUL Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION Alan Malan City Engineer/ Land Use Administrator 550 North 800 West Commissioners Kris Nilsen West Bountiful, Utah 84087 Mike Cottle Laura Mitchell City Recorder/ Phone (801) 292-4486 Community Corey Sweat FAX (801) 292-6355 Dennis Vest Development www.WBCity.org Cathy Brightwell THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL HOLD A REGULAR MEETING AT 7:30 PM ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2021, AT THE CITY OFFICES AGENDA: 1. Prayer/Thought by Commissioner Mitchell. 2. Accept Agenda. 3. Conditional Use Application for Home Occupation Business at 963 Meadowlark Lane – John & Jessica Nelson. 4. Staff report. 5. Consider Meeting Minutes from October 26, 2021. 6. Commissioner Training. 7. Adjourn. ---------------------------------------------------- This notice has been sent to the Davis Journal and was posted on the State Public Notice Website and the City’s website on November 5, 2021, by Cathy Brightwell, City Recorder.  MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission DATE: November 5, 2021 FROM: Staff RE: Conditional Use Permit Request for a Home Occupation Business at 963 Meadowlark Lane (963 W 1850 N) for John & Jessica Nelson. ________________________________________________________________________________ John and Jessica Nelson have applied for a Conditional Use Permit to authorize a Home Occupation business license to resell equipment such as power tools, gym equipment and weights. Their application explains that they buy wholesale goods and sell on local classified sites such as Facebook marketplace and KSL.com and buyers pick up items in person or they are delivered. The planning commission discussed proposed conditions at its October 26th meeting and asked staff to work with legal counsel to clarify and fine-tune the conditions for further consideration. Mr. Doxey has also provided possible findings for the commission to consider as they deliberate this issue. If the planning commission determines to grant the conditional use permit: Possible Findings: 1. The proposed use, with appropriate conditions, will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. Compliance with the Home Occupation ordinance (Chapter 5.28) and the conditions to be imposed will keep this use clearly incidental and secondary to the residential use of Applicant’s dwelling and will preserve the residential character and lifestyle of the neighborhood in terms of traffic, parking, and activity. 2. The proposed use, as conditioned, will not have an inordinate adverse impact on schools, utilities, or streets. No additional schools or utilities are required, and additional traffic will be insignificant as conditioned. 3. The proposed use, as conditioned, will provide appropriate buffering of uses, proper parking and traffic circulation, the use of building materials and landscaping in harmony with the area, and compatibility of adjoining uses. The appearance of the dwelling and residential landscaping will not be altered. The conditions require parking to be off-street and limit the number and types of deliveries and pickups. 4. The proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the land use ordinance for such use. The conditions require this. 5. The proposed use, with appropriate conditions, will conform to the intent of the city’s general plan. The general plan does not prohibit home occupations as long as they preserve the residential character and lifestyle of residential zones. 550 North 800 West, West Bountiful, UT 84087 (801) 292-4486  6. The conditions imposed in the conditional use permit will mitigate the reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of the proposed use and accomplish the purposes of the land use code in accordance with applicable standards. Conditions: 1. The home occupation must comply with all applicable laws and, in particular, WBMC 5.28 – Home Occupations, including the requirements specified in these conditions, to protect the residential character and lifestyle of this residential zone. 2. The home occupation will be limited to a home office in the dwelling that does not exceed 15% of the main floor. Applicant may use up to 25% of a garage or accessory structure on the property for business purposes, as long as such use does not change the residential character of the lot and is not contrary to the purposes of WBMC 5.28 3. Inventory or supplies may not occupy more than 50% of the permitted area in the dwelling, garage, or accessory structure. Based on the building permits for the property, this means inventory and supply storage is limited for each building on the property (only the garage or accessory structure may be used for inventory and supplies, not both), as follows: i. Dwelling - 1281 main floor sf x 15% = 193 sf x 50% = 97 sf for inventory ii. Garage - 886 sf x 25% = 222 sf x 50% = 111 sf for inventory iii. Accessory Structure - 2100 sf x 25 % = 525 sf x 50% = 263 sf for inventory 4. Applicant must confirm in writing at the time the permit is issued which structure—the garage or accessory structure—will be used for the home occupation. If the applicant subsequently elects to use the other structure, the applicant must seek prior approval from the planning commission, which may or may not impose additional or different conditions in modifying the permit. 5. Applicant must provide a clear separation of space between inventory for resale and any personal equipment or products so that each may be clearly identified upon inspection. If aApplicant elects to use the garage for the home occupation, for example, any inventory and supplies must be stored in the garage, and any personal equipment or products must be stored elsewhere. 6. Consistent with WBMC § 17.60.050, the applicant will allow the City and its agents to inspect the property and the structures on the property at reasonable times without prior notice to verify compliance with applicable laws and the conditions of the permit. 7. Except as provided below, delivery of merchandise will be limited to standard delivery trucks used for regular online purchases. One delivery by a truck not to exceed 28 feet in length is allowed no more frequently than every 30 days. Deliveries will be limited to the hours between 8 am and 7 pm. a. Delivered merchandise may at no time be placed or kept on the street right-of-way. b. Customer pick-ups will be scheduled between 8 am and 7 pm with no more than one customer per hour so that neighborhood traffic is limited. c. Sufficient off-street parking will be provided for customer vehicles when picking up merchandise. 8. Outdoor storage related to the home occupation will not be permitted (WBMC § 5.28.040.I). 9. Applicant will cease all sales from the property until a home occupation business license is issued. 10. Applicant will comply with city and state regulations for retail businesses, including obtaining a state registration and sales tax id, and will provide any requested information as part of its home occupation license review. 550 North 800 West, West Bountiful, UT 84087 (801) 292-4486  11. Applicant will obtain and maintain a home occupation business license. 12. The permit will be subject to a 90-day probation period. If any condition is violated during the probation period, the permit and home occupation business license will be revoked, and the final permit will not be issued absent additional evidence presented to the planning commission justifying the issuance of the final permit. Following issuance of the final permit, the permit may be modified, suspended, or revoked upon complaint after a hearing before the planning commission. 13. Applicant’s obligations under these conditions will be binding upon any successor, heir, or assign of applicant with respect to the property. If the planning commission decides to grant the conditional use permit it can do so now but the permit and business license will not be issued until the applicant has signed the permit agreeing to comply with the conditions and has met all requirements for the home occupation business license. If the planning commission determines to deny the conditional use permit: Possible Findings: 1. The proposed use at this particular location is not necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility that will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community. The proposed general retail sale of gym equipment and other products from a dwelling in a residential neighborhood will unnecessarily change the character of the neighborhood. Although retail sales can contribute to the well-being of the community, they are best conducted from property in a commercial zone that allows similar uses and is better equipped for higher traffic, parking, and other impacts from a commercial business. 2. The proposed use will be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. This use is not clearly incidental and secondary to the residential use of Applicant’s dwelling and will adversely affect the residential character and lifestyle of the neighborhood in terms of traffic, parking, and activity. 3. The proposed use will not comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the land use ordinance for such use. The land use ordinance requires that home occupations, where allowed, preserve the residential character and lifestyle of the neighborhood. This retail business, with numerous deliveries and customer pickups per week, will alter the residential character of the neighborhood. 4. The proposed use will not conform to the intent of the city’s general plan. The general plan separates most residential and commercial uses. This home occupation will not preserve the residential character and lifestyle of residential zones. 5. No conditions can be imposed that will substantially mitigate the reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of the proposed use and accomplish the purposes of the land use code in accordance with applicable standards. This is a retail business, whether conducted largely online or not. It involves deliveries of equipment and products and customer pickups that will alter the residential character of the neighborhood as a place for dwellings and incidental uses. 550 North 800 West, West Bountiful, UT 84087 (801) 292-4486  1 1 West Bountiful City October 26, 2021 2 Planning Commission Meeting 3 PENDING – NOT APPROVED 4 Posting of Agenda - The agenda for this meeting was posted on the State of Utah Public Notice website, 5 on the West Bountiful City website, and at city hall on October 22, 2021, per state statutory requirement. 6 7 Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of West Bountiful City held on Tuesday, October 26, 2021, 8 at West Bountiful City Hall, Davis County, Utah. 9 Those in Attendance: 10 MEMBERS ATTENDING: Chairman Alan Malan, Commissioners Mike Cottle, Dee Vest, Corey Sweat, 11 Laura Mitchell, Council member Kelly Enquist. 12 13 STAFF ATTENDING: Duane Huffman (City Administrator), Kris Nilsen (City Engineer), Cathy Brightwell 14 (Recorder), and Debbie McKean (Secretary), Chief Erekson. 15 VISITORS: Council member James Bruhn, Jake Young, Lisa Young, Dale Edwards, Scott & Bonnie Jones, 16 John and Jess Nelson, Lynne & Monte Widdison 17 18 The Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 7:30 pm by Chairman Malan. 19 1. Prayer by Commissioner Vest. 20 21 2. Accept Agenda 22 Dee Vest moved to approve the agenda as presented. Mike Cottle seconded the motion. Voting was 23 unanimous in favor among all members present. 24 25 3. Conditional Use Application for Home Occupation Business at 963 Meadowlark Lane-John 26 & Jessica Nelson. 27 28 Commissioner packets included information from staff regarding a Conditional Use Permit Request for a 29 Home Occupation Business at 963 Meadowlark Lane (963 W 1850 N) for John & Jessica Nelson. 30 31 Duane Huffman reminded the commission that state law says a conditional use must be approved if 32 reasonable conditions can be imposed to mitigate the reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of the 33 proposed use. A conditional use may be denied if the reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of a 34 proposed conditional use cannot be substantially mitigated by the imposition of reasonable conditions 35 to achieve compliance with applicable standards, which is very rare. 36 37 Cathy Brightwell explained the request. The Nelson’s have applied for a Home Occupation business 38 license and associated Conditional Use permit to resell equipment such as power tools, gym equipment 39 and weights. Their application explains that they buy wholesale goods to sell on local classified sites 40 such as Facebook marketplace and KSL.com and buyers pick up items in person or they are delivered. 41  2 42 Staff explained the license requirements outlined in WBMC 5.04.010 and 5.28.010. The Nelson’s were 43 required to notify neighbors within 300 feet of their property that they have made application to 44 operate a business from their home. They provided signatures from most of their neighbors but not all 45 within the 300 foot radius. They are also required to register their business with the state and obtain a 46 Utah sales tax ID which they have not yet done. 47 48 Cathy Brightwell provided a summary of the issues that have been raised by neighbors regarding this 49 business. The city began receiving complaints from neighbors in late 2020 claiming that the Nelson’s 50 were operating a business. Several large semi-truck deliveries were documented showing large boxes 51 unloaded onto the street. They claim the deliveries and increased customer traffic has changed the 52 residential character of the neighborhood. Pictures were provided. 53 54 The city contacted Mr. Nelson and told him he could not run a business out of his home without an 55 approved license. He was provided a business license application and copy of home occupation 56 regulations to review. He responded that they had “moved a bunch of stuff to their storage unit and 57 would be mostly selling from there.” He added that they were going to pursue finding their own retail 58 space outside of the city. 59 60 Similar complaints continued into spring and through the summer. Mr. Nelson was again told that he 61 needed to stop his operation or submit a business license application, which he agreed to do. 62 63 Mr. Nelson has explained to staff that no part of the business is conducted in the dwelling, only storage 64 of merchandise in the attached garage. City staff inspected the property and found that no equipment 65 appeared to be stored in the large accessory building; rather, inventory storage is limited to a portion of 66 the attached garage. 67 68 Due to the neighbor protests and questions about the impact this business has on the neighborhood, 69 staff determined that a conditional use application is appropriate so the planning commission can 70 consider the issues. 71 72 Applicant comments: 73 Mr. Nelson was invited to take the stand. He noted that the picture displayed of merchandise in his 74 garage is very old and he no longer has that much inventory on his property, nor does he expect to have 75 that size of inventory in the future. He said he is willing to agree to random inspections by the city. 76 While there was a period during COVID that their business was exceptionally busy with many customers 77 coming to his home to pick up merchandise, he said that is no longer the case. He does not have more 78 than 1 customer per hour during an eight-hour workday and they are usually only there for 10 minutes 79 for a pick-up. He stated that his business is not detrimental to the neighborhood in any way. He believes 80 he has been transparent through the whole process and was quite distraught about his family being 81 filmed by neighbors. 82 83 Public comments: 84 Dale Edwards, 946 W Meadowlark Lane lives directly across the street to the east of the Nelsons. He 85 spoke of the negative impact he feels the business has on the neighborhood. In the 20 years he has 86 lived there, there are about 10 home businesses in the neighborhood, but none have impacted the 87 neighborhood like the Nelson’s has. He admitted to taking videos and pictures of the impact of the 88 neighborhood to show to the city. He said that he and other neighbors have attempted to talk with Mr. 89 Nelson about their concerns, but they have been ignored. He stated that Mr. Nelson has been very  3 90 confrontational when approached about his business. He shared a time when he tried to speak with Mr. 91 Nelson and was pushed by him. Mr. Edwards feels this business is not appropriate in a residential 92 neighborhood especially with semi-trucks of inventory being delivered onto the street. He also raised a 93 concern about sales tax. The on-line ads claim sales tax is included in the price of merchandise, but he 94 does have a sales tax id number or state registration number. He stated the city is their last hope to 95 stop this business from continuing to negatively impact the neighborhood. 96 97 Lisa Young, 968 W 1850 N, lives directly across the street to the north of the Nelsons. She has not been 98 happy since the city allowed the Nelsons to build the large building that he said would be used for 99 personal gymnastics for his family. The lights on the building are a nuisance and intrusive and now he is 100 running a full-time business that makes the neighborhood feel like a warehouse district. She reported 101 that there have been non-stop cars in and out of his property even on Saturdays. 102 103 Scott and Bonnie Jones, 990 W Ruby Way, live behind the Nelsons. They said they have not been 104 notified to sign the application. They do not have any emotional issues with the Nelsons but are very 105 concerned with the size of the business and that it does not meet the city regulations for a home 106 business. They feel the city has been turning a blind eye to the issue. Mr. Nelson is running a business 107 without a business license or collecting state sales tax. The traffic from people coming to the home is 108 very disruptive to the neighborhood. This type of business does not belong in a residential 109 neighborhood. 110 111 Mr. Nelson responded that he was not aware he had to go to all homes within a radius of 300 feet of the 112 property line. He apologized for his misunderstanding and will notify those neighbors that have not 113 been notified. 114 115 Commissioner Comments: 116 117 There was discussion about whether the application should be tabled until proper neighbor notice is 118 provided, and the applicant obtains a sales tax id. It was decided that discussion of proposed conditions 119 should continue as no license will be granted until the conditional use application is fully considered, 120 and the conditions adopted are met. 121 122 Commissioner Mitchell asked Mr. Nelson about the frequency and amount of customer traffic. He 123 responded that people call and make an appointment to pick up merchandise. There are no open house 124 type sales or yard sales. He admitted to some issues last year during COVID due to high demand but 125 traffic has significantly decreased since then. They have secured two storage units, one in the city and 126 one outside the city to hold excess inventory. Their goal is to work toward building their business into a 127 full-time commercial business that will be operated in a retail commercial location. He said he has no 128 problem with any of the proposed conditions and will comply with whatever the city sets up. When 129 asked about truck deliveries, he said when he orders merchandise, he is not made aware of the size of 130 trucks delivering product. He added that he collects rare exercise equipment for his personal use which 131 is also delivered. He does not anticipate any future large freight loads like he had before. 132 133 There was discussion about the following conditions proposed by staff and the need for legal review and 134 advice before they can be adopted. 135 1. The home occupation must meet the requirements of WBMC 5.28 – Home Occupations, 136 including the requirements specified in these conditions to protect the residential character and 137 lifestyle of residential zones.  4 138 2. The home occupation will be limited to a home office in the dwelling. Use of any portion of a 139 garage or accessory structure on the property for business purposes that exceeds 25% is 140 prohibited. 141 3. Delivery of merchandise will be limited to “x” size truck, “x” times per week/month, between 142 the hours of 8 am and 7 pm. 143 4. Delivered merchandise may at no time be placed on the street right-of-way. 144 5. Customer pick-ups will be scheduled between 8 am and 7 pm with no more than one customer 145 per hour so that neighborhood traffic is limited. 146 6. Sufficient off-street parking will be provided for customer vehicles when picking up 147 merchandise. 148 7. Outdoor storage related to the home occupation will not be permitted (WBMC § 5.28.040.I). 149 8. Applicant will comply with city and state regulations by applying for and maintaining a current 150 Home Occupation Business License, Utah State Business Registration, and obtaining a Utah Sales 151 Tax ID number. 152 153 Mr. Nelson noted that he sells the same things that he uses personally. His accessory building is used as 154 his family’s personal gym and some of equipment may be sold if he is replacing it with a newer piece of 155 equipment. His retail merchandise is stored in a portion of the attached garage, and he asked about how 156 best to determine what is personal and what is business if there is overflow out of the 25% space limit. 157 158 Mr. Huffman asked that he find a solution to separating what is business and what is personal use. Mr. 159 Nelson responded that KSL ads accurately list all the things he is selling and can be tracked accordingly. 160 Mr. Huffman informed him that if he cannot differentiate his personal items from his business then that 161 could be grounds for denying the conditional use permit. He also informed Mr. Nelson that all things for 162 sale need to fit within one structure. 163 164 Mr. Nelson responded that he had been told by staff that he could use a combination of his garage and 165 accessory building to determine the 25% total. Some discussion took place regarding the interpretation 166 of the ordinance and the amount of space the business can occupy. Staff has determined that the code 167 only allows a percentage of either the garage or the accessory building – not both, so Mr. Nelson will 168 need to decide which building he intends to use for his business. Mr. Nelson stated that the accessory 169 structure is not used for business at all; he only uses a portion of the attached garage space. He would 170 like to be able to use up to 600 square feet of the third stall of his garage to store inventory. 171 172 Some discussion took place regarding consideration of giving more square footage for his business in the 173 garage. Duane Huffman stated that the municipal code does not allow for flexibility and Mr. Nelson 174 needs to pick which structure he will use for business and then comply with the regulations of the code. 175 It was also noted that WBMC 5.28.040 of the home occupation code states that only 50% of the 176 permitted area may be used for inventory which further limits the square footage available. 177 178 Staff will take the proposed conditions discussed this evening to legal counsel for assistance with fine- 179 tuning appropriate conditions for the permit. A new condition will be added limiting the size of delivery 180 trucks to 28 ft in length every 30 days; anything smaller is unlimited. The permit will also require the 181 Nelsons to claim which structure will be used and will list the allowed usable space for that structure. 182 Random inspections will also be added to ensure compliance with the conditions due to the prior history 183 of non-compliance. Mr. Nelson was instructed to provide notification to all residents within a 300 square 184 foot radius of the boundaries of his property and produce that information to the city. He was also 185 directed by Mr. Huffman to cease all sales from his residence until the Home Occupation and  5 186 Conditional Use permits are in place. It was suggested by Councilmember Enquist that a probation 187 period be put into place given the prior history of the property. 188 189 Action Taken 190 Corey Sweat moved to table this agenda item until staff and the city attorney can prepare a 191 comprehensive list of conditions for consideration by the commission. Laura Mitchell seconded the 192 motion and voting was unanimous in favor. 193 194 Corey Sweat moved to have a 5-minute recess. Laura Mitchell seconded the motion and voting was 195 unanimous in favor. 196 197 4. Review Additional Options to the Housing in Certain Commercial Areas Overlay Draft 198 Ordinance, WBMC 17.42 199 200 Commissioner packets included a memorandum dated October 22, 2021, from Staff regarding 201 suggestions from city council to add additional flexibility to the proposed Housing in Certain Commercial 202 Areas Overlay draft ordinance, WBMC 17.42. The memorandum included the following information: 203 204 The city council has reviewed the new Housing in Certain Commercial Areas overlay (“HCCO”) as 205 recommended by planning commission. They discussed the advantages of adding more flexibility by 206 shifting the original draft’s requirements to recommendations on site and building design. As these 207 changes impact the recommendation made by planning commission, staff was directed to present the 208 alternate proposal for further planning commission consideration and comments. 209 210 Duane Huffman explained that he values the opinions from the planners and the commission even 211 though he may not agree with the structure they came up with. The city council was interested in adding 212 more flexibility to the proposed draft that would give developers the ability to come forward with their 213 own proposals that could be addressed as part of development agreement negotiations. The draft he is 214 proposing changes all requirements to recommendations. Also provided was a draft from John Janson 215 and Jake Young that added back in several requirements they believe to be important to the success of 216 the overlay. 217 218 Jake Young explained that ordinances should be specific to ensure the intended outcome. They need to 219 be clear so that good developments can be created and to keep a bad development out. Many of the 220 requirements are based on industry standards that are simple and practical in terms of minimums for 221 landscaping, heights, setbacks, etc. The intent is to keep from wasting city’s time and resources sorting 222 through a lot of ideas that may not be advantageous to the city. 223 224 Corey Sweat stated he has always supported recommendations versus requirements so that the 225 development agreement could be flexible. He added that giving leniency creates a better product 226 opposed to keeping things within a box. Because the whole process will need to be reviewed with the 227 developer a better more creative product can be developed with recommendations rather than 228 requirements. He suggested that the setbacks and dump station be kept in place as requirements. 229 230 Following review of the proposal, the following changes were made to the “Recommended” draft. 231 232 17.42.050 A.1 - setbacks will be required, height will be recommended.  6 233 17.42.A.2 – Front yard setbacks will be required to be landscaped and be a minimum of 20 feet from 234 public right of way. 235 17.42.A.3 – Rear and side yard setbacks will be required. 236 17.42.D – Lighting shall be directed downward. The list of locations to be lighted will be required. 237 17.42.E – Setbacks adjacent to a residential zone shall be landscaped. 238 17.42.060.C.1. – Common guest parking shall not include any driveway that accesses a garage. 239 17.42.060.E. – Balconies will be a minimum of 60 square feet. 240 17.42.060.G.2 – Minimum number of parking stalls shall be required. 241 17.42.070 – Signs shall be governed by Chapter 17.48 except all illuminated signs shall have downward 242 directed and shielded lighting. 243 244 Action Taken 245 246 Corey Sweat moved to resubmit the recommended changes to WBMC 17.42, listed above, to the City 247 Council for their consideration. Mike Cottle seconded the motion and voting was unanimous in favor. 248 249 5. Update on West Bountiful Public Works Building at 1410 West 1200 North. 250 251 Duane Huffman stated that since the city will need a conditional use permit for the new public works 252 maintenance building, he wanted to briefly update them on the site plans for the building. 253 254 Mr. Huffman showed a preliminary rough draft of the site plan. He noted the building will be 40 feet 255 from property line, 27 feet high 80 feet wide. The city wants to create an attractive building but use cost 256 efficient materials (metal will be used for the main structure). He further explained that: 257 • The outside storage areas will be 3 sided bays with roofs. They will meet all setback 258 requirements. 259 • Egress and Ingress will be better than what we have currently with two entrances off 1200 N. 260 • Decorative gates will be installed at the front entrances with chain link surrounding the rest of 261 the property. 262 • They will likely ask for a deferment of curb, gutter, and sidewalk since there is currently none on 263 1200 North. In the future, a possible asphalt trail may be designed in the place of sidewalk. 264 • A retention basin will be used for drainage. 265 • The area East of the building will be in concrete, and the west area will be asphalt. 266 • A floor plan was shown including office areas, kitchen, conference room, storage, pull through 267 bays and work areas. 268 • There will be a large storage mezzanine over the office area. 269 • A carport-like roof will be off the back of the building to house garbage cans. 270 • The building is expected to be fox gray and polar white with window placement that will soften 271 up the metal building. 272 • Lighting is still being planned and will be fairly limited and not intrusive. 273 274 275 6. Staff Report 276 277 Cathy Brightwell: 278 • Training will be postponed for tonight. Please report completed training completed on your 279 own. Another hour of training is still required before the end of the year.  7 280 Kris Nilsen 281 • 400 North well house construction is in progress. 282 • Working on planning next year’s major construction project which is 600 West from Porter Lane 283 to Pages Lane. 284 285 7. Consider Meeting Minutes from September 28, 2021. 286 287 Action Taken: 288 Laura Mitchell moved to approve of the minutes of the September 28, 2021, meeting as presented. 289 Corey Sweat seconded the motion and voting was unanimous in favor. 290 291 8. Training- Postponed due to length of this meeting. 292 293 9. Adjourn. 294 295 Action Taken: 296 Mike Cottle moved to adjourn the regular session of the Planning Commission meeting at 10:17 pm. 297 Corey Sweat seconded the motion. Voting was unanimous in favor. 298 299 ...................................................... 300 The foregoing was approved by the West Bountiful City Planning Commission on November 9, 2021, by 301 unanimous vote of all members present. 302 ____________________________________ 303 Cathy Brightwell – City Recorder