City Council Study Meeting

MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -1- THE WEST VALLEY CITY COUNCIL MET IN ELECTRONIC STUDY SESSION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020 AT 4:30 P.M. THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AND CONDUCTED BY MAYOR BIGELOW. THE MEETING WAS HELD ELECTRONICALLY VIA ZOOM. THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT ELECTRONICALLY: Ron Bigelow, Mayor Lars Nordfelt, Councilmember At-Large Don Christensen, Councilmember At-Large Tom Huynh, Councilmember District 1 Steve Buhler, Councilmember District 2 Karen Lang, Councilmember District 3 Jake Fitisemanu, Councilmember District 4 STAFF PRESENT ELECTRONICALLY: Wayne T Pyle, City Manager Nichole Camac, City Recorder Paul Isaac, Assistant City Manager/ HR Director Nicole Cottle, Assistant City Manager/General Counsel/ CED Director Eric Bunderson, City Attorney Colleen Jacobs, Police Chief John Evans, Fire Chief Jim Welch, Finance Director Layne Morris, CPD Director Russ Willardson, Public Works Director Nancy Day, Parks and Recreation Director Sam Johnson, Strategic Communications Director Steve Pastorik, CED APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF STUDY MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 2020 The Council considered the Minutes of the Study Meeting held November 10, 2020. There were no changes, corrections or deletions. Councilmember Lang moved to approve the Minutes of the Study Meeting held November 10, 2020. Councilmember Buhler seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and all members voted in favor of the motion.  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -2- REVIEW AGENDA FOR REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 17, 2020 Councilmember Lang asked if backup cameras are included in the Camry’s being purchased for the Police Department. Russ replied yes. Upon inquiry by Mayor Bigelow, members of the Council had no further questions or concerns regarding items listed on the Agenda for the Regular City Council and Special Redevelopment Agency Meetings scheduled later this night. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 24, 2020 A. ACCEPT PUBLIC INPUT REGARDING APPLICATION ZT-7-2020, FILED BY WEST VALLEY CITY, REQUESTING A ZONE TEXT CHANGE TO CREATE THE CHESTERFIELD OVERLAY ZONE Mayor Bigelow informed a public hearing had been advertised for the Regular Council Meeting scheduled November 24, 2020, in order for the City Council to hear and consider public comments regarding Application ZT-7-2020, filed by West Valley City, requesting a Zone Text Change to create the Chesterfield Overlay Zone. Proposed Ordinance 20-47 related to the proposal to be considered by the City Council subsequent to the public hearing, was discussed as follows: ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 20-47, AMEND SECTIONS 7-11-212 AND 7- 11-214 AND ENACT PART 7-14-700P OF THE WEST VALLEY CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO CREATE THE CHESTERFIELD OVERLAY ZONE Steve Pastorik, CED, discussed proposed Ordinance 20-47 that would amend Sections 7-11-212 and 7-11-214 and enact part 7-14-700P of the West Valley City Municipal Code to Create the Chesterfield Overlay Zone. Written documentation previously provided to the City Council included information as follows: At the request of the Planning Commission and City Council, City staff is requesting a zone text change to create the Chesterfield Overlay Zone. Related to this application is application Z-8-2020, which applies the proposed overlay zone to the Chesterfield neighborhood. The Chesterfield neighborhood is unique in that homes within the neighborhood are generally older and smaller than most of the rest of the City and many of the neighborhood streets do not include curb, gutter and sidewalk. The attached presentation includes information that highlights ways that the Chesterfield neighborhood is unique. The proposed MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -3- Chesterfield Overlay Zone includes standards for new development that will allow new homes that are more compatible with existing homes. Included with this issue paper is a table that compares the proposed overlay zone standards with the current ordinance requirements. Also included is an email received from a resident of the Chesterfield neighborhood. Councilmember Lang expressed concern that the amount of variation between homes is minimal. Steve detailed the ordinance and how it would apply to the look of the homes. Councilmember Lang asked how many units away two similar homes would need to be. Steve replied two houses away. Councilmember Lang asked if this is standard. Steve replied the City could increase the separation if the Council preferred. Councilmember Buhler asked if this separation is required in other subdivisions. Steve replied variation requirements are required but the standards are not as detailed. Councilmember Buhler stated that he doesn’t have a problem expanding the required amount of variation between homes but noted that there aren’t many places in Chesterfield where someone can build a row of homes. Councilmember Huynh stated the Council wants to keep Chesterfield unique and special and asked what is being accomplished with this proposal. He indicated that mass production of similar homes is something to be avoided. Wayne stated that staff brought this before the Council at their request. Councilmember Huynh stated he doesn’t believe the ordinance accomplishes the goal of the Council. Councilmember Buhler disagreed and stated that he feels this is a good step toward preserving the uniqueness of Chesterfield. Councilmember Fitisemanu agreed and stated that he recalls most members of the Council being supportive of this Overlay Zone. Councilmember Buhler stated that the Council needs to make the decision to move forward with this proposal or not so that staff and the Planning Commission do not have to keep revisiting it. Councilmember Christensen stated that this is a public hearing so residents from Chesterfield can provide the City with their input as well. Councilmember Buhler agreed but noted that this ordinance does not require any resident of Chesterfield to change anything with their home or property. He indicated that this would simply apply to new residential development and is meant to help preserve the unique feel of Chesterfield. Steve stated that many phone calls were received from residents but once they understood what this proposal was, they were not as concerned. He noted that some residents were opposed to curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Councilmember Lang asked if there is a street plan for sidewalks. Steve replied yes and indicated where this could be found in the ordinance. Councilmember Lang stated she feels the ordinance is well proposed but wants to see a greater separation of variety between homes. Councilmember Huynh stated Malvern Ave is small and he doesn’t believe sidewalks should be added.  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -4- Steve stated that Malvern Ave was included because this street leads to a pedestrian overpass to Redwood Elementary. Councilmember Huynh stated the school was built many years ago. Mayor Bigelow stated that the minimum home size proposed seem too large for Chesterfield. He indicated that one unique feature of Chesterfield is small homes with large lots. Mayor Bigelow stated he doesn’t like the proposed minimum home size and indicated that he believes smaller homes should be permitted. Mayor Bigelow stated he doesn’t like allowing vinyl siding as a building material. He indicated that he would also like to see a preservation of larger, oddly shaped lots in Chesterfield. Councilmember Huynh agreed. He stated that he doesn’t want to see large lots being subdivided. Councilmember Lang agreed regarding eliminating vinyl siding but indicated that she does not want to see a decrease in the minimum home size permitted. Mayor Bigelow stated he would be okay with hardiboard as an allowed material but not vinyl. Councilmember Lang and Huynh agreed. Mayor Bigelow and the Council directed staff to provide a greater majority in homes by requiring homes at least 3 apart and disallowing vinyl siding in the proposed ordinance to be considered next week. Councilmember Buhler stated that he would be okay reducing the minimum home size but feels that subdividing lots should be allowed as long as they are not flag lots. Councilmember Lang stated that Chesterfield is a move in and stay community and she feels smaller homes would increase transit. Councilmember Huynh agreed. Mayor Bigelow stated that he believes smaller homes will prevent multiple families from living in one house and reduce the amount of traffic and parking problems. Councilmember Lang suggested a 1400 square foot average for a development of one or more homes but 1200 square foot minimum for individual homes. Mayor Bigelow, Councilmember Fitisemanu, and Councilmember Buhler agreed that this would be reasonable. Councilmember Huynh stated that he would not like to see this standard change in the proposal. Mayor Bigelow discussed the ability of having different standards in certain neighborhoods. The City Council will consider Ordinance 20-47 at the Regular Council Meeting scheduled November 24, 2020 at 6:30 P.M. B. ACCEPT PUBLIC INPUT REGARDING APPLICATION Z-8-2020, FILED BY WEST VALLEY CITY, REQUESTING A ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED GENERALLY BETWEEN 2420 SOUTH AND 2920 SOUTH AND BETWEEN 1680 WEST AND THE JORDAN RIVER TO ADD THE CHESTERFIELD OVERLAY ZONE Mayor Bigelow informed a public hearing had been advertised for the Regular Council Meeting scheduled November 24, 2020, in order for the City Council to hear and consider public comments regarding Application Z-8-2020, filed by West MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -5- Valley City, requesting a Zone Change on property located generally between 2420 South and 2920 South and between 1680 West and the Jordan River to add the Chesterfield Overlay Zone. Proposed Ordinance 20-48 related to the proposal to be considered by the City Council subsequent to the public hearing, was discussed as follows: ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 20-48, AMEND THE ZONING MAP TO ADD THE CHESTERFIELD OVERLAY ZONE FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY BETWEEN 2420 SOUTH AND 2920 SOUTH AND BETWEEN 1680 WEST AND THE JORDAN RIVER Steve Pastorik, CED, discussed proposed Ordinance 20-48 that would amend the Zoning Map to add the Chesterfield Overlay Zone for properties located generally between 2420 South and 2920 South and between 1680 West and the Jordan River. Written documentation previously provided to the City Council included information as follows: Staff has requested a zone change to add the proposed Chesterfield Overlay Zone to properties located between 2420 South and 2920 South and between 1680 West and the Jordan River. Associated with this application is application ZT-7-2020 which creates the proposed Chesterfield Overlay Zone within the Zoning Ordinance. If approved, the proposed overlay zone would apply to 493 parcels. The underlying zoning on all of these parcels is either R-1-6 (single unit dwelling residential, minimum lot size 6,000 sq. ft.) or A (agriculture, minimum lot size ½ acre). Those properties with A zoning will retain their animal rights if the overlay zone is adopted. The proposed overlay zone will apply to all new homes and additions to existing homes. The overlay zone standards address housing design and right-of-way improvements. It does not change allowed uses, setbacks or density regulations. Councilmember Huynh asked for clarification on the boundary of the proposed Overlay Zone. Steve displayed a map displayed the suggested location of the Overlay Zone. Councilmember Huynh expressed concern about restrictions on building shopping centers on a particular lot on Redwood Road. Steve replied the Overlay Zone applies to residential homes. The City Council will consider Ordinance 20-48 at the Regular Council Meeting  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -6- scheduled November 24, 2020 at 6:30 P.M. ORDINANCE 20-49: AMEND SECTIONS 1-2-110 AND 20-7-102 OF THE WEST VALLEY CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CERTAIN STORM WATER UTILITY FEES Russ Willardson, Public Works Director, presented proposed Ordinance 20-49 that would amend Sections 1-2-110 and 20-7-102 of the West Valley City Municipal Code to amend certain storm water utility fees. Written documentation previously provided to the City Council included information as follows: This ordinance modifies the Consolidated Fee Schedule to increase Storm Water Utility (SWU) fees from $4.00 to $6.00 per month per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) for most SWU customers. An adjustment is also made in the definition of one Equivalent Residential Unit, which increases the impervious area equal to one ERU from 2,830 square feet to 3,163 square feet. New revenue generated from this fee increase would be used for capital improvements, and associated design and construction management costs. An analysis has been completed on all needed capital improvement projects, including the piping of existing open ditches, replacement of old corrugated metal pipe, and upgraded storm drains to alleviate street flooding. Assuming 4% annual cost increases, the historical storm water capital improvement budget of $1 million annually, leaves $58 million in uncompleted projects in 2050. It has been 15 years, since this fee was adjusted. We have fallen behind in funding storm drainage capital improvements and replacements. Since this fee was last increased, the RSMeans Construction Cost Index has increased over 50%. The condition of the storm drain system will continue to deteriorate without additional funds. The proposed fee increase generates an additional $1.5 million in new revenue annually. Combined with the current annual CIP budget, this new revenue is sufficient to complete all anticipated improvements by 2043. All projects and the proposed funding year are shown on the attached list. Currently all operation and maintenance costs are covered in the existing budget. The above scenarios do not account for increased operational costs. Additional fee increases will be needed in the future, as those costs increase.  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -7- Since inception of the Storm Water Utility in 2001, storm water utility fees and flood control impact fees have been the only funding sources for storm water operations and capital improvements. Without the Storm Water Utility, this cost would fall back to the General Fund. Most Utah cities now charge a Storm Water Utility fee. For the 12 cities surveyed, West Valley City has the lowest fee at $4.00 per month. Provo has the highest fee at $10.75 per month. The average fee is $6.77 per month. See attached bar chart. A 50% increase in fees ($4 to $6 per month) is significant for the largest Storm Water Utility customers. A reevaluation of the impervious area equal to one ERU was done as part of this fee analysis. This increased the area equivalent to one ERU from 2,830 SF to 3,163 SF. The result is the number of ERUs per site (and subsequently the fee) decreases for non-residential uses. Instead of a 50% increase on a $2 per month fee change, non-residential parcels would see a 34% increase. Adjusting these fees now, with an effective date of July 1, 2021, allows large Storm Water Utility customers to plan for the increased fees. Mayor Bigelow asked if this should be done in one increase next year or if it should be phased over the next few years. Councilmember Buhler stated that he feels an increase to $6 is fair compared to other Cities and he doesn’t feel a phased in process would make sense. Mayor Bigelow stated that he would suggest $1 a year over the course of 3 years. Councilmember Lang asked if these funds could be used for a new road. Russ replied no but added that storm drains can be replaced before construction of a new road. The Mayor and Council discussed different cost increases and how this would impact projects. Russ discussed projects and their priority. He indicated that this increase would allow for replacement of needed Stormwater projects to be completed by 2043. Councilmember Lang asked if there is a sufficient number of employees to accommodate the completion of the proposed projects in the suggested timeline. Russ replied staffing would need to be increased over time to accomplish everything as presented. Councilmember Lang stated she is comfortable raising the utility fee cost to $2 now and bringing it back in a couple years to re-evaluate. Councilmember Lang asked for an annual report on progress. Russ discussed ERU size and how this increase would impact large commercial entities, so this has been modified to lessen the significant increase of cost for them. Mayor Bigelow stated that the priority of projects may change over time. The City Council will consider Ordinance 20-49 at the Regular Council Meeting scheduled November 24, 2020 at 6:30 P.M.  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -8- RESOLUTION 20-177: APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF A VARIABLE SPEED WATER PUMP STATION FOR THE STONEBRIDGE GOLF COURSE Nancy Day, Parks and Recreation Director, presented proposed Resolution 20-177 that would approve the purchase of a variable speed water pump station for the Stonebridge Golf Course. Written documentation previously provided to the City Council included information as follows: West Valley City solicited proposals for the replacement of the variable speed water pump station for the Stonebridge Golf Club. The pump station is of utmost importance as, without it, the course would not have an irrigation system and the turf as well as other plants would perish. Four companies responded with Flowtech being selected. Parks and Recreation publicly advertised for proposals for the replacement of the variable speed water pump station for the Stonebridge Golf Club. The current pump station is the original unit and is over 20 years old. There have been numerous problems with the current station including excessive rusting that will no longer allow welding repair work to be done. Affected areas include the filters and main manifold as well as deterioration of the metal floor. The system’s electronics and computer are also original units that are outdated to the point that technicians cannot utilize their sensors to diagnose problems. The RFP was posted on the West Valley City website, in the newspaper, on bid sites and several companies were contacted by staff. The proposals were evaluated and compared against each other in a matrix format by a qualified committee. Evaluation criteria included price, warranty, timeline and adherence to specifications. The four proposals submitted are as follows: Flowtech: $274,635 A.P.E.: $277,134.11 Double D: $306,855 Van Con: $563,800 Out of these proposals, Flowtech was the lowest responsible bidder. Councilmember Buhler asked about the health of the fund balance. Wayne stated that the fund balance is healthy but noted this replacement is necessary. He indicated that not replacing the water pump station at this time would cost the City more in the loss of revenue  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -9- generated from the golf course. The City Council will consider Resolution 20-177 at the Regular Council Meeting scheduled November 24, 2020 at 6:30 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 24 2020 A. RESOLUTION 20-178: AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO ACCEPT A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT AND RELEASE A STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT Mayor Bigelow discussed proposed Resolution 20-178 that would authorize the City to accept a Storm Drain Easement and release a Storm Water Drainage Easement. Written documentation previously provided to the City Council included information as follows: In 2005 a Storm Water Drainage Easement was recorded in favor of West Valley City over properties lying to the north of Condie Estates No. 3. Condie Properties, LLC has recently recorded a Storm Drain Easement in favor of West Valley City over and across a private lane owned by Condie Properties, LLC and known as Condie Lane. As the existing Storm Water Drainage Easement will no longer be needed, it needs to be abandoned and released. Condie Properties, LLC is the developer of the proposed Phil’s Farm Subdivision. The proposed subdivision will create seven residential lots and extend the dedication of Old Farm Court (4625 West) which will terminate with a cul-de-sac. As part of required improvements for the proposed subdivision a storm drain line will be constructed from the end of the cul-de-sac east to the northeast corner of the subdivision and north through Condie Lane to the storm drain in 4100 South. With the construction of the new storm drain piping and recording of the new storm drain easement, the existing Storm Water Drainage Easement is no longer needed. As the easement is no longer necessary, an Abandonment of Storm Water Drainage Easement has been prepared for approval by the West Valley City Council and execution by the Mayor. Upon inquiry, there were no further questions or concerns expressed by members of the City Council. The City Council will consider Resolution 20-178 at the Regular Council Meeting scheduled November 24, 2020, at 6:30 P.M.  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -10- COMMUNICATIONS A. PARKS NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING REPORT Nancy Day, Parks and Recreation Director, presented a PowerPoint Presentation summarized as follows - Utah State University o Recreation Administration Program o Department of Kinesiology and Health Science o Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services o Authors  Nate Trauntvein, PHD  Jesse Johns, PHD - Research and Public Engagement o Background & Information Gathering o Facility Tours o Individual Meetings o Focus Groups o Open Community Forums o City-Wide Online Household Survey  Random Sample  Stakeholders  Social Media, Website  Postcard  25% mailed to each district - Observations from Focus Groups, Town Forums, and Individual Meetings o WVC has committed citizens interested in public recreation issues. o WVC is fortunate to have an outstanding community center that serves young and old. o WVC residents value their open space, natural areas and trails. o WVC residents have overall level of satisfaction with breadth of park and recreation facilities. o Participants noted concern with maintenance and upkeep as well as safety concerns due to nefarious park use. - Survey Data Analysis o respondents saw Significant PERSONAL, FAMILY & COMMUNITY benefits FROM parks and recreation facilities and programs - Demographics o Median Age = 40 o 75% Female MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -11- o 69% Employed Full-Time o 29% Some College  24% 4 Year Degree o 66% Households with Children o 73% White o 14% Hispanic or Latino - Survey Data Analysis Continued o 84% Used a WVC P&R Facility in past 12 months o 44% Participated in a Program o Over 60% said they do not visit/use WVC P&R facilities/programs as often as they would like.  70% Due to Lack of Time because of Work or other Obligations  35% Due to Lack of Money/Too Expensive o Neighborhood Parks used Frequently/Regularly (54%) o Areas needing most improvement were Trails, Greenways, Playgrounds o Social Media Usage:  74% Facebook  50% YouTube o Indoor Facility Desires:  38% Teen/Youth Center  38% Indoor Performing Arts Center  30% Additional Multipurpose Gyms - Funding o 72% Believe a portion of property tax should be used to offset costs to build and maintain P&R facilities o 57% Believe a portion of property tax should be used to run recreation programs & activities o $100 Hypothetical Spending  Parks & Open Space $25.76  Trails & Greenways $21.52  Indoor Recreation Facilities $16.05  Recreation Programs $15.36  * Other $11.07  Outdoor Athletic Fields $ 8.10 o * Pool, Splash Pads, Dog Park, Playground Equipment, Programming, All-Ability Access, Fishing Pond, Adult Play Equipment, Disc Golf, etc. - NATURE-BASED PROGRAMMING: MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -12- o 45% feel nature-based programming is important but unavailable or insufficient  Partner with clubs, Tracy Aviary, schools, etc.  Wetland Park Programming - OUTDOOR ADVENTURE PROGRAMS: o Over 37% desire more outdoor adventure-based programming (biking, hiking, etc.)  Increase Field Trips  Develop Outdoor Clubs  Increase Climbing Program  Add New Programs  Kayaking, Canoeing  Sailing  Fishing - EXPAND NATURAL AREAS: - Interest in expanding natural areas for outdoor recreation pursuits o Redesign Existing Parks o New Park Design Standards o Wetland Park Development o Trail Map - A majority of respondents used neighborhood parks (54%) regularly or frequently. Splashpads/Water Features desired by many respondents. - SAFETY CONCERNS: o Nearly 25% would visit parks more often but were concerned about safety due to nefarious park use.  New Park Standards (visibility, lighting, cameras, etc.)  Redesign Existing Parks  Add Park Patrols - GENERAL MAINTENANCE & UPKEEP: o Would like to see more maintenance and upkeep of neighborhood parks.  Analyze Current Operations – Consider Additional Changes/Direction  Increase Contractor Use  Continue Playground Replacement Plan and other Amenities - FAMILY FITNESS CENTER OVERCROWDED: o More than 40% used FFC Regularly or Frequently  1500 Average Visitors Daily (not including programs/spectators) o Communicate Less Busy Times & Alternatives MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -13- - ACCESS TO OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOL: o WVC Acquired Centennial Pool o FFC Members have a Discounted Package Available - ACQUIRE REDWOOD MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER - SAFETY: o Increase Visibility of Staff o Use of Security Guards o Introduce Safety Campaign (Entire Department) - Dog parks were reported to be one of the most unavailable or inadequate recreation resources in WVC. (42%+). Dog parks were most frequently mentioned in “other” category. Dog parks were highest priority in open ended section. Many citizens drive to other communities to visit dog parks. - DOG PARK CONSIDERATIONS: o Evaluating Options for PD K-9 Training Area o SLCO Lodestone Park, Possibly Magna Regional Park o Small Dog Parks in Various City Locations including MVC Trail Parcels o East side of City by Jordan River Trail - The preferred social media platform is Facebook. YouTube is second. Better communication is needed so residents know what is available to them. - COMMUNICATION PLAN: o Design & Implement Department Communications Plan  Increase Social Media Output  Increase Video Production  Increase Website Use  Increase Cross-Marketing Efforts  Other Methods:  Direct Mail, Door Knockers, Real Estate Agencies, etc. - Interest from Focus Groups to be more actively involved. Community desires to be engaged in development of new parks & renovations of existing parks. - PUBLIC INPUT & INVOLVEMENT: o Create Department Advisory Board o Continue Community Forums in each District o Continue Neighborhood Involvement with Park Design & renovations o Increase 3rd Party Sport League Discussions  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -14- Councilmember Buhler stated that Parks are an area that the City can make a big difference for the community. He thanked Nancy for her work and commitment to the Parks Department of West Valley City. B. COVID-19 UPDATE Mayor Bigelow suggested not including a COVID-19 update on the agenda each week or a memo from staff. Councilmember Buhler agreed and stated that he would only like to be notified of significant changes or ways that the Council can contribute. Councilmember Lang stated that she finds the memo helpful and would like to continue receiving information to share to members in her district. Mayor Bigelow stated that anything impacting the City in a significant way should be made aware to the Council, but a weekly update isn’t as necessary in his opinion. After discussion, the Mayor and Council agreed to continue receiving the memo weekly but removing the update from the agenda. C. COUNCIL CALENDAR Mayor Bigelow referenced a Memorandum previously received from the City Manager that outlined upcoming meetings and events. Members of the City Council had no further questions regarding the Council Update. NEW BUSINESS A. POTENTIAL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Council Suggestions Councilmember Huynh expressed concern about secondary employment for the Police Department. Councilmember Huynh stated that he feels the Tow Rotation should be opened to everyone and not restricted to 15 or less. Mayor Bigelow stated that these are administrative actions but since they are brought up so frequently, he felt these needed to be discussed. Councilmember Christensen stated that the Council is the Legislative branch of the City and this doesn’t fall under the jurisdiction of the Council. Mayor Bigelow stated that elected officials represent the public and the Council can request changes. Councilmember Buhler stated that the Council received an update from the Police Department on both topics. He indicated that he was uncomfortable knowing each Police Officer was negotiating their own pay and some were paid less than others. He indicated that he isn’t an expert on how the tow rotation should be handled but feels the Police Department would know best and would have the best recommendation.  MINUTES OF COUNCIL STUDY MEETING – NOVEMBER 17, 2020 -15- Councilmember Lang stated that she feels the Council should take action on these issues. She indicated both issues impact the safety of citizens and she would be in favor of hiring an additional member of staff to handle this responsibility. Mayor Bigelow stated that these issues are both very different. He indicated that when an officer drives a City car and wears a City uniform, they represent West Valley City. He indicated that he is concerned about the scenarios in which the City would assume liability. Councilmember Fitisemanu agreed that secondary employment should be carefully handled in the way proposed by staff. Councilmember Fitisemanu stated that he would like more information on the tow rotation to refute information provided by many emails received from companies. B. COUNCIL REPORTS None MOTION TO ADJOURN Upon motion by Councilmember Lang all voted in favor to adjourn. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS OF THE WEST VALLEY COUNCIL THE STUDY MEETING ON TUESDAY NOVEMBER 17, 2020 WAS ADJOURNED AT 6:29 PM BY MAYOR BIGELOW. I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, accurate and complete record of the proceedings of the Study Meeting of the West Valley City Council held Tuesday, November 17, 2020. _______________________________ Nichole Camac, CMC City Recorder