Architectural Review Committee

WHITEFISH ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES June 21, 2022 The meeting was called to order by Diane Kane at 8:15 AM PRESENT: Christine Bleyhl, Diane Kane, Ryan Kiefer, Leslie Lowe, Paul McElroy, Tracy Rossi ABSENT: none (one vacancy) STAFF: Wendy Compton-Ring PUBLIC COMMENT: none MINUTES: The minutes from June 7, 2022 were unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS Crestwood duplex, 57 Crestwood Drive, Good Medicine Developers LLC ARC 22-12) Described the changes from the previous meeting and handed out an updated material board. Motion: Leslie – move to approve Ryan – 2nd Discussion: none Vote: motion passes unanimously Crestwood duplex, 58 Crestwood Drive, Good Medicine Developers LLC (ARC 22-13) Described the updated plans and changes from the previous meeting. Motion: Leslie – move to approve Ryan – 2nd Discussion: none Vote: motion passes unanimously 1 NEW BUSINESS Village Square Condo, Central Avenue & E 3rd Street, façade change, Kai Lindborg (ARC 22-09) Described the project, location, materials and color. Including the enclosing the ceiling along the rakes of the awning and the wrapping the three posts in front of the jewelry store. Ryan – concerned the shakes look a little plastic-y, but the color is good Paul – it will be an improvement Motion: Leslie – move to approve Tracy – 2nd Discussion: none Vote: motion passes unanimously 104 O’Brien Avenue, Mixed Use, MT Creative (ARC 22-10) Described the project, location, site plan, floor plan, materials and colors. A retaining wall 18-inches or less will be developed along O’Brien Avenue to be faced with rock. Leslie – is there an opportunity to try a different type of materials for the driveway to improve its look? Something other than asphalt? A lot of hardscape. Tracy – the update is an improvement from the pre-ap Christine – the tacked-on element isn’t right and noted concerns with materials – switching from horizontal to vertical; the orientation of the siding change isn’t logical Leslie – change the material size – would that help? Ryan – change in size would make it seem less tall Is there a balance? Ryan – composite panel is a commercial application for a residential use; doesn’t seem right Tracy – it is a gray area with residential but also a commercial-type of building Christine – we need to see the physical samples before we can make any motions Ryan – agrees Paul – an improvement from the pre-ap Motion: Tracy – move to table subject to review of the actual material samples Ryan – 2nd Discussion: Leslie - Is there an opportunity to approve to not stall out the process? 2 Ryan – like the gable on the front but understands the changes from the pre-ap; look at the materials for the driveway Vote: motion passes unanimously OTHER ITEMS • The Committee still has one vacancy. The Committee was encouraged to find someone to apply. • Cancelled the July 5th meeting. Meeting adjourned at 9:08 AM 3