Planning and Zoning Board

FINAL PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305 5 MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2018-7:00 P.M. Life's Just Bettc1· g ere 7 8 MEMBERS ATTENDANCE 9 Nick Berry, Chair p 10 Don D'Arminio, Vice Chair p 11 Robert Cassidy p 12 Daniel Keester-O'Mills p 13 Richard Safaty p 14 Brad Sterl p 15 Tim Theisen p 16 Jeb Shafer (alternate- non-voting) p 17 18 Staff 19 Mike Cirullo, Assistant City Attorney 20 Roberta Moore, Community Development Services Director 21 Evy Kalus, City Planner 22 Lian Chan, Prototype, Inc. 23 24 I. Call to Order 25 26 Chair Berry called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m . 27 28 II. Roll Call 29 30 Roll was called by Ms. Chan , and a quorum was present. 31 32 Ill. Pledge of Allegiance 33 34 IV. Approval of Minutes - None 35 36 V. Public Comments - None 37 38 VI. Quasi-Judicial Hearing 39 40 Assistant City Attorney Cirullo advised that only Item a) is Quasi-Judicial. Items b) and 41 c) are Public Hearings. He then explained the quasi-judicial process. He announced 42 that those wishing to speak on any application should raise their right hand and be 43 sworn in. Mr. Cirullo performed the swearing in for the hearings. 44 45 Mr. Cirullo further clarified that the second and third items (TNOD 18-01 and SP 18-02) 46 will not have a vote to approve, but a vote to recommend to the City Commission .  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 2 1 2 a) v 18-06 3 Wilton Waterfront LLC 4 156 N E 30 Street 5 Wilton Manors, FL 33334 6 7 Cindy Butler, representing Wilton Waterfront LLC , property owner, is 8 requesting variances to reduce the required setback for a pool and deck 9 per Section 045-060 of the City's Unified Land Development Regulations 10 from five (5) feet to zero (0) feet for the pool and from three (3) feet to zero 11 (0) feet for the existing concrete deck for the property located at 156 NE 12 30 Street. 13 14 Applicant: 15 Cindy Butler, 156 NE 30 Street, Wilton Manors, described her property and the parcel of 16 land behind it. She stated that she was not aware that the land behind her property was 17 not hers until after making a deposit on the purchase of her house (she made the 18 deposit sight unseen) and a survey was done as part of the loan process. She said 19 other properties just like hers have pools on the property line, but the City records do 20 not go beyond 10 years back to research the plans . 21 22 Ms. Butler explained that she tried to purchase the rear property from the South Florida 23 Water Management District (SFWMD) to no avail. They said they would change the 24 original quit deed for the entire 2,000 square foot piece of property for $45 ,000 and 25 maintain the seawall. She claimed the maintenance of the seawall , which was not 26 contiguous to her property, caused her hardship. 27 28 Ms. Butler read from a copy of Broward County Property Appraiser's aerial map with 29 names and addresses of five (5) properties that have a pool on the property line, if not 30 on the District's property. She said two of them did not have to get variances to get the 31 pool on their property line. She said she had document with copies of a building permit, 32 a Certificate of Completion from 2008, and a document from the Build ing Department 33 concerning a pool that extends into the District's land. 34 35 Ms. Butler stated that the Water Management District told her that she did not have to 36 buy the ir property, she could put the pool on their property and they would give her the 37 variance to do it at no cost. However, the Building Department denied that. 38 39 Questions of Applicant: 40 • Did you know about the SFWMD owning the land before or after closing? 41 o About three to four weeks after giving the deposit, but before closing . 42 • Is that when you started trying to purchase the land from the SFWMD? 43 o Not at that time. I proceeded with the purchase so I would not lose my 44 deposit.  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 3 1 • When you started to buy the land, they told you they would sell it to you 2 contingent upon you maintaining the seawall? 3 o No, that part did not surface until the quit deed discussion - that was 4 never a condition of the sale. I spoke to Brandon Tucker (real estate 5 person) who went to SFWMD and spoke to their real estate department 6 about the maintenance of the seawall . 7 • What does the maintenance of the seawall have to do with the variance? 8 o I was never told (until a month and a half ago) that I would be responsible 9 for the seawall even if I bought a small portion of the SFWMD parcel. 10 • Where was the pool going to be? 11 o The pool edge would be at the property line. I will use my existing 12 concrete pad that is now used as decking. 13 • Did you choose to have a survey before putting down a deposit? 14 o No, because it was going to be a cash deal, and I did not anticipate any 15 problem with the pool. 16 • In the variance application it says you put repairs into the seawall? 17 o Yes, I spent $300 into the seawall because I thought it was mine. The 18 person (the previous owner) who sold the house to me did the repairs , and 19 I assumed and was told it was my responsibility. 20 • Did the water authority put in writing that you could put the pool on their 21 property? 22 o No, Brandon Tucker gave me verbal permission , and he said it was 23 allowed . 24 • Did the neighbors who have pools on the SFWMD property get building permits 25 when they built their pools? 26 o Yes , I have two (2) applications and one (1) with the permit and close-out. 27 The Building Department records do not go back far enough for the 28 others. 29 • Does the house to your immediate east have a pool and a permit? 30 o Yes . 31 o Does it come up to the property line or go over it? 32 o To the property line. 33 • Who is Brandon Tucker? 34 o He is one of the officials on the Governing Board of Directors of SFWMD 35 o Did he verbally tell you he could put it on the property line? 36 o Yes, and there would be "no question" that I could get the variance. I did 37 not ask him to put it in writing because I went to the Building Department 38 to see if I would be allowed by the City to do it and was denied . So , I did 39 not pursue it. 40 • What is the size of the pool? 41 o 30 feet by 8.6 feet 42 • Is it possible to put a pool on the side of your house?  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page4 1 o The area is narrow with no entry point. There are also trees that would 2 have to be cut down, and the setback would make it even smaller. 3 • The City Code is constantly changing, so the Board does not know what it was at 4 the time the neighbors got their pools. The only property being dealt with is the 5 subject property. Is this your first real estate purchase? 6 o No. I had a 10 (ten) day inspection period, and I did have an inspection. 7 • Did you hire a seawall inspector? 8 o Yes, but the previous owner took care of the repairs . I have a seawall 9 report. Nobody indicated to me that it was not my property. I told the 10 previous owner to repair it because I thought it was my property. 11 • Are you a resident here? 12 o No. It is licensed as a vacation rental. 13 • If the seawall came with the property, it would be yours to maintain. Did you 14 assume that you had to take care of the seawall? 15 o If that was the case, I would have been able to put the pool anywhere I 16 wanted . 17 • It seems you had a misrepresentation of the property being waterfront, but you 18 didn't stop the transaction after the survey. Therefore, the variance is self- 19 inflicted . 20 21 Chair Berry stated that since the SFWMD does not appear to want to maintain the 22 property, it is abandoned. However, the applicant is asking for a variance to build too 23 close to their property, and they are not here; he was not comfortable encroaching on 24 someone else's property. The District would have to agree to plat the land to her plat, 25 and she would have to go through a re-platting . 26 27 • Regarding putting the pool on the side yard , is the side yard six (6) feet larger 28 than the back? 29 o The width is similar, but the length is less. 30 • The backyard looks to be 14.6 feet and the side yard is 20.59 feet. 31 o There are a lot of trees by the fence , and I want to keep them . 32 • One of the requirements for a variance is that you have to request the minimum 33 vanance. 34 o There is no access to that side yard from the house; there is a back door, 35 but no access to the side. 36 37 Staff: 38 Ms. Kalus gave a PowerPoint presentation on the property and application. [Attached] 39 40 She stated that the site would require two (2) variances , one (1) for the pool and one (1) 41 for the pool deck. Staff recommends denial of the variance application . 42 43 Questions of Staff:  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 5 1 • Are there two other places on the parcel that the pool could go -the side yard or 2 the front yard? The side yard looks much larger than the back yard . 3 o The side yard is 20.58 feet in width and the length is estimated at 20 feet. 4 • Is the side setback the same as the rear setback? 5 o Yes . If the applicant moved the pool slightly forward and stopped the pool 6 at the rear setback, the pool would be long. 7 • They could probably put in the same size pool on the side as they are requesting 8 for the back. 9 • What is the setback from the actual residence to the water of the pool? 10 o There is a minimum setback, approximately 18 inches. 11 • Can the SFWMD land be built on if someone owns just that parcel? 12 o No. 13 • Would SFWMD get cited if they do not maintain the property? 14 o Yes . 15 • Does staff know if the properties with pools at the property line were done 16 legally? 17 o Staff researched , but it has been more than ten (1 0) years so it is 18 unknown. 19 • Does staff have information about the deck on the subject property? 20 o Staff has no way of knowing since it was built in 1968, but it could not be 21 built that way now. 22 • What wi ll happen with those houses that are inconsistent with current Code when 23 they sell? 24 o If the City is asked , all they could say is that there is no record of a permit. 25 • Can the pool be built on the front side of the property? 26 o There is a front setback of 43.04; it is different for the side yard 27 • Having a pool on someone's property line is different than having it on the 28 property line of an untended lot. 29 • Why are there no records - was it due to the flood that destroyed records? 30 There should be something from Broward County. 31 o Residential permits are required to be kept for ten (1 0) years only. The 32 documents would have been purged after ten (1 0) years. The property 33 owner could search for the County records . 34 35 Public Comments: 36 None. 37 38 Applicant: 39 Ms. Butler stated she has proof that her neighbors had their pool permitted in 2008. 40 She said her neighbors and the pool builder were in attendance at the meeting. She 41 presented the permit and the other documents previously mentioned to Ms. Moore for 42 evidence. 43  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 6 1 Chair Berry explained that it is difficult for the board to evaluate the materials, as they 2 did not see them before the meeting. 3 4 Ms. Butler clarified that it was a permitted job at 132 NE 30 Street, approximately five 5 (5) houses away from hers. Mr. Theisen clarified that the house was three (3) doors to 6 the left. The pool was built in the District's property, and the paperwork says the survey 7 was from 2014. She did not submit the information before, because she just got it from 8 staff (due to staff being out of town) . 9 10 The pool builder, Ron Burr, was asked to be a witness. Mr. Cirullo performed the 11 swearing in. 12 13 Ron Burr, 616 NW 30 Court, said his company built the pool directly to the east of the 14 subject property, but not the other pool on the street. The permit that Ms. Butler just 15 provided was the permit from his company from 2008. The pool was all finaled out with 16 "no questions asked ." The name of his company is Rite-Way Pools , and Mr. Burr said 17 they build a lot of pools in Wilton Manors. 18 19 Mr. Burr stated that their standard policy for space between the house and pool is five 20 (5) feet. The side yard is approximately 20 feet wide, and if five (5) feet is subtracted 21 from the house and five (5) feet from the property line, only ten (1 0) feet are left. If a 22 deck is desired on the west side, there would be an even narrower pool. 23 24 Mr. Burr maintained that the side yard would be a "poor position" for the pool due to 25 inconvenient access, the large trees that would make the pool dirty, and not much 26 space. Regarding the front of the property, there would be space , but most people do 27 not want a pool in the front and it would have to be fenced off. 28 29 Mr. Burr did not know if he would be hired to install Ms. Butler's pool ; he was just 30 present as a contractor and to provide support for Ms. Butler. 31 32 Board member Safaty asked staff if there were any major Code changes since 2008 33 that would affect a change in the setback for the 2008 building permit to be approved . 34 Ms. Kalus said she would have to research the matter. Mr. Cirullo advised that the last 35 time that Section of the Code was changed was January, 2005 . 36 37 Motion made by Board member Theisen , seconded by Board member Sterl , to approve 38 Variance 18-06. 39 40 Discussion on the motion ensued , with Board member Theisen supporting the variance 41 since the adjacent lot is vacant and others were allowed to put in pools. Mr. Cassidy 42 said since he supported the variance for the other project two (2) years ago, he would 43 support this one. 44  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 7 1 Vice Chair D'Arminio supported the variance, noting that bu ilding the pool to the vacant 2 property is different than to a neighbor's property line, the applicant has put a lot of work 3 into her variance, the Code has not changed since 2005 , and there are similar pools in 4 the neighborhood. He added she will probably be forced to maintain the seawall. 5 6 Chair Berry thought the applicant did not do her due diligence. 7 8 While agreeing that the circumstances of the District not maintaining the property are 9 annoying for the property owner, Board member Keester-O'Mills believed the application 10 did not meet all the variance criteria . He said there were other areas the pool could be 11 constructed. 12 13 Board member Cassidy argued that she met the first condition of a variance because 14 the adjacent SFWMD property is unique and beyond her control. Other properties did 15 not have to contend with that, because they got permits . He added that Ms. Butler will 16 have the additional burden of having to maintain the adjacent parcel. 17 18 In a roll call vote , the motion to approve Variance 18-06 passed (5-2) , with Board 19 member Keester-O'Mills and Chair Berry opposed . 20 21 Chair Berry noted that although alternate Jeb Shafer was present, he was not voting 22 since all board members were present. 23 24 Chair Berry announced that Items a) and c) will be presented simultaneously, per the 25 appl icant's preference. 26 27 b) TNOD 18-01 28 Donald K. Croxton & Douglas J. Pew 29 300 & 308 NE 21 Court and 301 & 317 NE 21 Street 30 Wilton Manors, FL 33305 31 32 Robert Allica , Agent, on behalf of Donald K. Croxton & Douglas J. 33 Pew, property owners , is requesting a rezoning from RS-5 (Single 34 Family Residential) to Traditional Neighborhood Overlay District 35 for the property located at 300 & 308 NE 21 Court and 301 & 317 36 NE 21 Street. 37 38 c) SP 18-02 39 Donald K. Croxton & Douglas J. Pew 40 300 & 308 NE 21 Court and 301 & 317 NE 21 Street 41 Wilton Manors, FL 33305 42 43 Robert Allica , Agent, on behalf of Donald K. Croxton & Douglas J. 44 Pew, property owners, is requesting site plan approval for 8  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 8 1 attached single fam ily units for the property located at 300 & 308 2 NE 21 Court and 301 & 317 NE 21 Street. 3 4 Applicant: 5 6 Robert All ica , architect and agent for the property located at 300 & 308 NE 21 Court and 7 301 & 317 NE 21 Street, stated that the house design is "Florida Cracker." Front 8 porches will face the avenues and the street, and parking access will be from the rear- 9 there will be no driveways. Access to the garages is from an alleyway from NE 21 10 Court, and egress is out NE 21 Street; garbage pickup would also be from the alleyway. 11 12 Mr. Allica detailed that there will be four (4) buildings with two (2) units with a shared 13 porch ; it will be perceived as one (1) residence . The buildings will be two-story with a 14 rooftop deck visible from the rear only. There will be exterior storage (no sheds) and 15 also a 15-foot side yard that could be used for a hot tub or small pool. 16 17 Mr. Allica stated there is another TNOD to the east of the project site. 18 19 Questions of the Applicant: 20 • Do all units have the roof deck? 21 o Yes. 22 • Are rooftop decks separated? 23 o They are structurally connected , but there is a privacy wall between them . 24 • Code requires 16 parking spaces, and that is covered by the garages. They 25 added eight (8) additional spaces. 26 o Those additional spaces will be delineated somehow - they will have turf 27 blocks. Unless someone is parking there, it will be grass. 28 • Will the parking spaces be assigned? 29 o Not at this time. It would have to be discussed with the owners ; but it is 30 "public parking ." 31 • Wi ll the unit owners own the land? 32 o They will own the building and the land . The community will be serviced 33 under contract for landscape maintenance, etc. There will be an 34 association with a fee . 35 • What is the price point for the units? 36 o There is no price yet -they are still negotiating with the contractor on cost. 37 • Is there any signage? 38 o No, they are to appear totally residential , not a community project. 39 • There are two (2) different models of garages. Are they different in size? 40 o Yes, Model B is 20x19x1 0 deep. 41 • Unit 1 has no yard -will others have side yards? 42 o Unit 1 and Unit 8 will not have yards. 43 • Three (3) sides of the property will be facing streets . What will the east side be 44 facing? 45 o The east side will back up to the side of the adjacent properties.  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 9 1 • Do Units 1 and 8 have any private yard? 2 o They do not, because of the distance from the buildings. 3 • Is this the first time this project has been presented? 4 o No, there were workshops with Planning and Zoning and the public, and a 5 presentation for the HOA. 6 • Will there be wheel stops in the overflow parking? 7 o Yes, basically to identify them as parking spaces . 8 • It was noted that if the spaces had some type of marking (but not wheel stops) , 9 people could use it as open space when there were no vehicles there 10 • Observation that the placement of windows in the second floor front elevation 11 might make the shower/bath visible to outsiders . 12 • Will all power be undergrounded? 13 o Yes 14 • Do not see outside lighting for the side yards and would recommend that. 15 o Every exterior door is required to have a light, even a slid ing glass door to 16 the side. 17 • The photometries look very good , and it is a well-thought out plan . 18 • Will there be landings for the sliding glass doors? 19 o Yes, that is required by Code. 20 • Clarification sought about another site plan in the overlay district to the east? 21 o Yes, it is another TNOD . They are two-story townhouses. 22 23 Staff: 24 Ms. Kalus showed a PowerPoint presentation on the project. [Attached] She stated that 25 staff recommends approval of rezoning subject to the following conditions: 26 1) Recommendation of approval contingent upon allocation of two (2) 27 reserve units by City Commission . 28 2) Recommendation is contingent upon the approval of the site plan 29 application number SP 18-02. 30 3) The Declaration of Restrictive Covenant related to the Homeowners 31 Association must be recorded in the official public records of Broward 32 County, Florida prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the 33 proposed eight (8) attached single family units. Declaration of Restrictive 34 Covenants to include prohibition of long term rentals . 35 4) Unification of the four (4) parcels prior to submittal of first building permit, 36 subject to review by City Attorney and may require an Opinion of Title from 37 the property owner. 38 Staff recommends approval of the site plan with the following conditions: 39 1) Recommendation of approval contingent upon allocation of two (2) 40 reserve units by the City Commission. 41 2) Approval of rezoning from RS-5 to Traditional Neighborhood Overlay 42 District. 43 3) The Declaration of Restrictive Covenant related to the Homeowners 44 Association must be recorded in the official public records of Broward  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 10 I County, Florida prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the 2 proposed eight (8) attached single family units. Declaration of Restrictive 3 Covenants to include prohibition of long term rentals. 4 4) Electric vehicle charging infrastructure must be provided in each garage. 5 5) Unification of the four (4) parcels prior to submittal of first building permit, 6 subject to review by City Attorney and may require an Opinion of Title from 7 the property owner. 8 9 Questions of Staff: IO • Does the granting of the TNOD address the zoning or land use issue or both? II o Both. The granting of the reserve units is done at the same time. I2 • How many other TNODs have been approved? 13 o There is one next to it in th is neighborhood and several north of NE 26 I4 Street (behind Publix) I5 • When was the TNOD approved? I6 o The ordinance was approved in 2003. I7 • Is the prohibition on long-term rentals specific to the TNOD? I8 o Ms. Moore, Community Development Services Director, responded that 19 staff is concerned that flex or reserve units might be used as vacation 20 rentals, and the City has a limited number of such units. She then 2I corrected herself, noting that the condition should have said "short-term" 22 rentals, not "long-term" rentals . It is not a condition of the TNOD zoning. 23 It would be part of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, a separate 24 document. 25 o Mr. Cirullo advised that the language change should be made in both 26 recommendations. 27 • Can something be codified for that? 28 o Mr. Cirullo did not know if anything would be codified, but the applicant 29 would have to agree with the condition. 30 o Ms. Moore clarified that anything less than 30 days is considered short- 3I term under the vacation rental regulations. 32 • What is the difference between reserve and flex units? 33 o The City has had certain allocations for both types of units, but upon 34 Broward County Land Use updates, the categories will be merged and the 35 City may follow suit. 36 • How many units in both categories are left to be allocated? 37 o Units for the Pride Center were taken from the Urban Center pool for 38 affordable flex units (48), and there are three (3) units for every area in the 39 City excluding the Urban Center. Collectively, less than 500 "flex units" 40 remain. 4I • If the applicant wanted to, they could have requested five (5) buildings rather 42 than four (4). 43 o They could have per density requirements, but probably did not based on 44 the design and setbacks.  Wilton Manors - Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 11 1 • Noted that the applicant provided 50% more parking than required. At what point 2 is guest parking required by Code? 3 o These units are attached single family so they fall under single-family 4 parking requirements -there are no requirements for guest parking in that 5 part of the Code. 6 • The Code provision that allows for 100% of the parking in the garage with no 7 visitor parking required and no parking spaces should be looked at in the Code 8 revision process. There are no spaces for delivery vehicles, etc. 9 o Staff noted the comment. 10 • What qualifies this property as attached single-family when it looks like multi- 11 family? 12 o It could be defined as a townhouse , duplex, or attached single-family in 13 the Code. 14 • The eight (8) unit project on NE 8 Avenue that the board just approved was set 15 up as multi-family. 16 o That is not in a TNOD. It is within the eligibility area, but they did not 17 rezone the property to TNOD. 18 • Mr. Cirullo read the definition of attached single-family dwelling attached: "two 19 dwelling units attached or partially attached with a common wall or other 20 structure designed with a common front porch to give the appearance of a single 21 residence ." 22 • Why are there on ly three (3) architectural styles that can be used in the TNOD? 23 o Staff did not know the history of why those three (3) styles were chosen , 24 but they will look at that as part of the Code rewrite. They will research 25 what other cities have done. 26 27 Public Comment: 28 Jay Molusso, 201 NE 21 Court, spoke in favor of the development, stating he lives a 29 half block away from the site, and is very excited about the project. 30 31 Karen Sutton , 2016 NE 3 Terrace , said she liked the project, but was concerned about 32 traffic. She said that if all cars, 16 of them , come out one way onto NE 21 Street, they 33 will detour through the neighborhood to get to the street where they can make the left 34 turn onto Wilton Drive. 35 36 Questions of Staff: None 37 38 Applicant: 39 Mr. Allica said they studied which street to put the exit on , but putting it on NE 21 Court 40 would be worse than NE 21 Street. He said since cars cannot make the left turn on NE 41 21 Street, he would drive west toNE 3 Avenue and come down NE 21 Court. 42 43 At th is point, Chair Berry urged residents to visit the Community Development Services 44 office and review the plans before attending the public meeting. Staff is available to 45 discuss the plans with the residents.  Wilton Manors- Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 12 1 2 Chair Berry said that he lives in Belle Isle (60 units), and has not had any traffic issues. 3 He believed the project will not cause the "traffic nightmare" that people fear. He also 4 thought many of the residents would walk to Wilton Drive. 5 6 Board member Theisen observed that Model A and Model B do not match on the side 7 and rear elevations. There appears to be a balcony on the first floor on the left side on 8 Model A (opposite the garage entrance). Mr. Allica clarified that was a fence. Board 9 member Theisen also said that the doors do not appear to match the floor plan . Mr. 10 Allica said that they now have sliding glass doors from the great room , as depicted in 11 the site plan. 12 13 Board member Theisen expressed concern about the units having a direct view on to 14 neighboring lots on the east side. He asked if there would be a wall on the east side of 15 the driveway to screen the view. Mr. Allica stated there would probably be a fence 16 between the properties. He clarified that there would be views into the adjacent 17 property, but it would be to the sides of the units. 18 19 It was noted that the applicant has agreed to all the staff conditions. 20 21 Motion made by Board member Keester-O'Mills, seconded by Board member Sterl , to 22 recommend approval of the TNOD 18-01 rezoning application , with the four (4) staff 23 conditions as listed and rewording "long-term rentals" to "short-term rentals." In a roll 24 call vote, the motion passed unanimously (7 -0) . 25 26 Motion made by Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Board member Keester-O'Mills, to 27 recommend approval of Site Plan 18-02 with the five (5) staff conditions as listed , plus a 28 requ irement to put all utilities underground as amended. In a roll call vote, the motion 29 passed unanimously (7-0) . 30 31 VII. Staff Comments 32 33 Chair Berry asked if in the past, they have asked for electric or utilities underground, 34 and Ms. Moore said it was usually the utilities. 35 36 Ms. Moore pointed out that the November meeting is scheduled for November 12, which 37 is a holiday. Rescheduling the meeting to the week after that would bring it close to the 38 Thanksgiving holiday. Staff does not know at this time if there will be any applications . 39 40 Discussion ensued about the scheduling . For the most part, board members stated 41 they would be available to meet on other days of the week. 42 43 Ms. Moore advised that she will be presenting the 2019 Calendar for review at the 44 October meeting.  Wilton Manors - Planning & Zoning September 17, 2018 Page 13 1 2 VIII. Board Comments - None 3 4 IX. Adjournment 5 6 Upon motion duly made and seconded , the meeting was adjourned at 9:13p .m. 7 8 [M inutes transcribed by J. Rubin , Prototype , Inc.] 9 10 11 12 H 16 PZChai r60 Date 7