Citizen's Environmental Quality Committee
Regular MeetingWinona, MN · April 1, 2021
Minutes
CITIZENS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES
DATE: Thursday April 1, 2021
TIME: Scheduled for 4:30 pm (Virtual Zoom Meeting)
PRESENT: Dan Hall, David Ruff, Niki Ciulla, Lynette Power
GUESTS: Brian Voerding (Engage Winona)
STAFF: John Howard, Katie Grannes (Community Forestry Corps), Kelsie Travers (GreenCorps)
1. Call to Order: Call to order at 4:34 PM by Dan Hall (Chair)
2. Review and Approval of March 2021 Meeting Minutes: Approval unanimously without alteration.
3. Sustainability Plan Engagement:
Brian provided an overview of the goal to have broad public engagement. Brian suggested starting the
discussion with the CEQC with the six priority topics.
Priorities:
Dan does not see one glaring environmental issue that stands out – but many items to consider. Natural
areas management seems to him to be a top priority. Dan believes much of the energy situation is more
state and federal issue.
David said natural resource management is also his top priority. David said continuing to advance active
transport, tighter development all help and add up to success over time.
Brian asked about criteria for making big decisions?
Dan said the City could encourage more renewable energy and efficiency with new development. Infill
rather than expansion will be helpful.
Niki expressed her interest in learning from survey results since she is new to the area. She agrees that
natural resource management is a priority for the community, and she is interested in the energy and
benchmark topics, such as energy audits.
Brian asked about how CEQC sees itself being involved, and if there are areas which they expect to not
engage in.
David noted that the CEQC members not in attendance are very passionate about community gardens, and
residents approached the CEQC about the topic.
Dan discussed the advisory nature of the CEQC, which means they lack the resources or power to implement
projects. Resident engagement has influenced CEQC work topics, such as the noise pollution discussed at
the March meeting.
David said active transportation is a recurring focus, and the need to see active transportation as more than
bike lanes. Niki concurs.
David said the lake water monitoring is another topic to focus on.
Brian next asked about what questions the CEQC would like answered through the engagement process.
David is interested in seeing how natural resource management shows up. Seems there is an economic and
values basis for having that be a focus.
Niki is really interested to knowing the stories about how residents are personally affected, and expect to be
in the future.
Dan is similarly interested in seeing what the community says are major considerations. Some of the global
concerns could be top of mind, but at our local level, hard to see immediate problems.
Brian described the preliminary survey results, and other themes from the conversations with stakeholders.
Already 200 survey responses and 30 small group or one on one discussions. Flooding and water are
common topics, natural areas are too – typically in terms of use. Public transportation has come up, as has
natural resources. Use and enjoyment of natural resources comes up often.
Brian encouraged the CEQC to help with outreach to events.
Niki wondered about outreach plan on the survey, and how it was shared. Kelsie has not shared it with the
steering commitment yet. Niki asked if there are numerical survey goals or goals to vulnerable populations.
Brian says he typically aims for 300-500, and looks like we will meet that. John noted that the survey will be
open for a couple months at least.
Lynette says community gardens, as well as solar, wind and electric vehicles are very important.
4. Noise Pollution:
John summarized a message from another resident who reached out to express her issues with vehicle
noise. John will follow up with the policy department to better understand enforcement situation.
Lynette recommends advertising greater enforcement.
Dan expects that the Fastenal office building will be highly impacted by jake braking. Dan noted that the
speed limit does not decrease to 30 mph until near the bottom of the bridge. Thus moving the change in
speed toward the top of the bridge and the warning sign to the start of the bridge might solve the problem.
Lynette also recommends a sign indicating no jake braking, possibly at the base of the bridge.
David wonders if there is appetite to enforce motorcycle noise. Lynette would like to see that. Dan says
enforcement is difficult to do since police need to be at the right place at the right time, otherwise it can’t
be observed.
Dan noticed that the City noise code (39.03 (d)) is not in effect on County and State highways. David
wonders if state rules are in line with City ones to limit noise levels. Dan asked who is responsible for
enforcement and able to make changes?
Lynette asked about stinky and smoky vehicle enforcement – what can be done. How do police enforce? Niki
is somewhat reluctant to enforcement if it will impact poor populations. Niki sees potential for education in
sustainability plan.
5. Community Garden Planning Update:
John provided an update that the Mayor appointed people to the community garden task force. Niki asked if
there was anything needed before the task force to begin work. John said there are not barriers, and
expects to meet soon.
6. Other Business: Dan noted that PFAS was found in the Winona landfill outflow. Dan relayed that the plastics
industry has been working on this issue for about two years now. In plastics, the PFAS are seen as impurities.
EU banned PFAS at 25 PPB or above, which is very stringent, and led to reformulations of some compounds.
John noted that the landfill drainage is sent to the Winona Waste Water Treatment plant.
7. Adjournment: Meeting adjourned at 5:47 pm. Motion by David, seconded by Lynette. Approval unanimous.
Notes prepared by John Howard.
Agenda
March 29, 2021
Citizens Environmental Quality Committee
Winona, Minnesota 55987
Dear Committee Members:
The next meeting of the Citizens Environmental Quality Committee meeting will be held
virtually on Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 4:30 p.m. We will be using Zoom to video
conference, with a call in option as well. To access Zoom:
Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85610993614
Passcode: 55987
Optional Call in: +1 312 626 6799 Meeting ID (Web and call in): 856 1099 3614
1. Call to Order
2. Review of February Meeting Minutes
3. Sustainability Plan Engagement Discussion (30 minutes)
4. Noise Pollution Discussion (10 Minutes)
5. Community Garden Planning Update (5 minutes)
6. Community Commercial Shared Kitchens (10 minutes)
7. Other Business (5 minutes)
8. Adjournment
Sincerely,
John Howard
Natural Resources Sustainability Coordinator
CITIZENS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES
DATE: Thursday March. 4, 2021
TIME: Scheduled for 4:30 pm (Virtual Zoom Meeting)
PRESENT: Dan Hall, David Ruff, Niki Ciulla, Lynette Power
GUESTS: John Finn, Daniel Botz
STAFF: John Howard, Katie Grannes (Community Forestry Corps), Kelsie Travers (GreenCorps)
1. Call to Order: Call to order at 4:34 PM by Dan Hall (Chair)
2. Review and Approval of Feb. 2021 Meeting Minutes: Motion by David, second by Dan Hall. Approval
unanimous.
3. Noise Pollution:
Dan asked for Mr. Finn to describe the noise issues he was encountering in his neighborhood just to the
west of downtown. Dan stated that noise is “in the ear of the beholder”, and can be variable between
people. Mr. Finn says the issue is primarily use of “Jake Brakes” in trucks. Mr. Finn explained that this
method of braking utilizes the engine as an air compressor, and if installed with muffler, noise is minimal.
However, many trucks have the muffler removed so they are quite loud. The noise often come from the
bridge. Mr. Finn said many cities have signage notifying that use of “Jake Brakes” is not allowed, but often
not enforced. Dan said Winona has this signage. Dan wonders if moving the 30 mph limit on the bridge to
earlier on the incline could lead to less “Jake Braking”. Mr. Finn said this would require highway department
cooperation.
Dan asked if any point sources cause issues. Mr. Finn noted one point source is rail car vibration, which
creates a buzzing/humming sound, but it is not constant.
Dan asked if John had researched state and local ordinances about noise pollution. John said the City has a
code chapter related to noise pollution, and shared it on his screen. John will shared the code with the CEQC
and meeting attendees. John stated that the code prohibits modifying vehicles to create unnecessary noise,
and how has limits on noise in residential areas. Thus, the City may be able to measure the noise and
provide recourse for violations.
Dan asked if any specific decibel limits are described in the code. John scrolled to the applicable section of
code, and stated that residential areas have a daytime upper limit of 65 decibels. Dan gave a primer based
on his experience with noise monitoring.
Lynette noted that truck traffic noise is miserable on Franklin, and even worse on Mankato Blvd. Monitoring
of all truck routes, and enforcement needs to be more serious.
Mr. Finn noted that industrial noise is more an annoyance while outdoors, while the vehicle noise is even a
problem inside.
John to send out the applicable regulations, and determine City’s ability to monitor noise pollution.
4. Citizens Climate Lobby:
Mr. Botz provided a summary of the carbon fee and dividend concept that is a central tenet of Citizens
Climate Lobby.
The local chapter of the organization began in September, and has 14 members.
Dan asked for Mr. Botz’s request for CEQC action. Dan was unsure of how CEQC could be involved. It may be
more suitable for CEQC members to participate on their own time.
Lynette asked if support for carbon trading is included in the GreenStep Cities program. John was not aware
of this being a consideration in the GreenStep program. Dan clarified this proposal is a carbon tax, rather
than carbon trading. Discussion on environmental attribute trading ensued.
Dan suggested for John to determine if CCL proposal is applicable to GreenStep and City plan. Dan suggested
Mr. Botz might have more success with business outreach.
5. Community Garden Update: John began by explaining that the Mayor announced he is forming a task force
to explore community garden. This group will explore the need, research future expansion areas, and search
for funding and how to sustain the garden. Niki described that her capstone group is doing a multi‐prong
feasibility study looking at: mapping gardens and current areas, looking at the feasibility of other sites, and
drafting a community survey on need and interest.
Dan asked if Niki was involved with the Mayor’s task force, and she said she is likely to be a member. Lynette
added that one of her neighbors, who is a WSU professor, has students who could help with the survey
preparation. Lynette wonders if Bruno was contacted, and John said he was and has expressed interest in
the task force.
Lynette shared that a friend tried to reserve an East Rec. Center community garden plot, and only one plot
was available.
6. Sustainability Planning update: John said that the advisory committee is up and running. Engagement and
outreach is ongoing. At a later meeting, John will have a link to a survey. John plans to bring some questions
and discussion items to the CEQC for April. Lynette believes noise and light pollution should be on the table
for discussion as part of the plan.
7. Other Business: Lynette would like the City to make plans to avoid the catastrophe in heat and water that
affected Texas. Mr. Botz said Texas was an anomaly since they are not used to cold weather. Lynette
wondered about making a separate energy system to sustain in case of grid failure. John said there is
discussion in the sustainability committee about islanding a micro‐grid powered by renewable energy.
Lynette feels it would be valuable to have a guide on which community solar options are available, and
alternative energy education in general. Lynette said wind farms are increasing all the time. John relayed
that he and Kelsie held an educational session with the Citizens Utility Board this winter, and it seemed well
received by the attendees.
John said he hopes to continue the weed treatment at the West Lake using similar methods as last year. This
is separate from the phosphorus control via alum treatment.
8. Adjournment: Meeting adjourned at 5:43 pm. Motion by Lynette, seconded by Lynette. Approval
unanimous.
Notes prepared by John Howard.
CITIZENS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM: 3. Sustainability Plan Discussion
PREPARED BY: John Howard
DATE: April 1, 2021
The City has begun public engagement and outreach for the forthcoming Sustainability plan.
The City is working closely with Brian Voerding of Engage Winona to coordinate the effort.
Brian will attend to get input from the CEQC about plan priorities and to discuss what
sustainability means to you.
Another facet of the engagement and outreach strategy is an online survey. It would be great
if you would share the link below with your networks to ensure a diverse and robust
response. You are also welcome to take the survey.
Survey link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/sustainabilityplansurvey.
Questions to consider for the discussion with Brian:
How do you define sustainability?
What are the biggest challenges to sustainability Winona faces in this moment?
What are the biggest sustainability projects or opportunities for the City to take
advantage of right now?
What are Winona’s most important natural resources, and why? How well do you
think they are managed or protected? What could change to make that better?
Food, water, energy, materials+waste, transportation, and natural areas management
are the six key plan areas - which one is most important to work on in this moment, and
why?
CITIZENS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM: 4. Noise Pollution Discussion
PREPARED BY: John Howard
DATE: April 1, 2021
At the March meeting, the CEQC heard from a local resident, Mr. J. Finn, about noise
pollution concerns. Chapter 39 of City code was reviewed briefly, and is included for your
reference. Since then, another community member in a nearby neighborhood, C. Dretske
also reached out to express similar concerns.
Their message is as follows:
“I'm writing after noticing the Citizens Environmental Quality Commission had an agenda
item called Noise Pollution considerations. I've been interested in contacting the city about
some noise pollution control for some time now and this seemed like a perfect opportunity.
I would like to have the commission address a couple items. The first is trucks and semis that
jake brake coming down off the bridge. We live near Windom Park and often the jake braking
noise is very loud even this far away. I can't imagine how bothersome it may be for the
residents of the apartments near the bridge or how workers in the new Fastenal building will
feel about the noise.
The second item is in regard to motorcycles (though it could be other vehicles as well) driving
down 5th Street and Broadway using excessive acceleration. I have also found (pre-Covid)
when dining outside at Blooming Grounds that motorcycles will drive down 3rd Street and rev
their bikes unnecessarily. It makes for a very unpleasant dining experience.”
CHAPTER 39
NOISE POLLUTION
39.01 DECLARATION OF POLICY
39.02 DEFINITIONS
39.03 SOURCE REQUIREMENTS
39.04 MOTOR VEHICLE SOUND LEVEL REQUIREMENTS
39.04.1 PROHIBITIONS
39.04.2 NOISY PARTIES AND GATHERINGS
39.05 DECLARATION OF NUISANCES
39.05.1 PERMIT
39.06 REGULATIONS FOR TESTING AND MEASUREMENT
39.07 INSPECTIONS
39.08 ACCESS TO PREMISES AND RECORDS
39.09 INTERFERENCE WITH OR HINDRANCE OF A CITY OFFICIAL
39.10 REMOVAL AND CORRECTION OF VIOLATIONS
39.11 APPEAL
39.12 PENALTY
CHAPTER 39
NOISE POLLUTION
39.01 DECLARATION OF POLICY
It is the public policy of the city to eliminate existing noise pollution; to limit, as much as is
economically, socially, and technically feasible, further increases of sound levels; to protect
human health and welfare, animal life and property, and the enjoyment of life and property in all
residential, recreational, business, public and industrial areas in the city. It is necessary for the
city to provide means for the control, prevention, prohibition and abatement of noise and noise
pollution.
39.02 DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this chapter:
Air Circulation Device: A mechanism designed and used for the controlled flow of air used in
ventilation, cooling, or conditioning, including, but not limited to, central and window air
conditioning units.
Ambient Sound: The all-encompassing sound associated with a given environment, being
usually a composite of sounds from many sources near and far.
City Official: Any representative of the city designated by the city manager.
Cut-Out or By-Pass or similar device: A mechanism which varies the exhaust system gas flow
so as to discharge the exhaust gas and acoustic energy to the atmosphere without passing
through the entire length of the exhaust system including all exhaust system sound attenuation
components.
dBA: A unit of sound level. dBA is the weighted sound pressure level by the use of the "A"
metering characteristic and weighting as specified in the American National Standards Institute
(A.N.S.I.) Specification for Sound Level Meters, S1. 4-1971. For the purpose of this chapter
dBA is used as a measure of human response to sound.
Decibel: A unit of sound pressure level, abbreviated dB.
Exhaust System: A combination of components which provides for enclosed flow of exhaust
gas from engine parts to the atmosphere.
Highway: Any street, road, alley or public way in the city.
Holiday: Any day fixed by the United States or by Minnesota State law for suspension of
business in whole or in part.
Lake Park: See definition in Section 55.11 of this Code.
L10: The sound level, expressed in dBA, which is exceeded 10 percent of the time for a one
hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the director of the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency.
Chapter 39 – Page 1 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
L50: The sound level, expressed in dBA, which is exceeded 50 percent of the time for a one
hour survey, as measured by test procedures approved by the director of the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency.
Motor Vehicle: Any self-propelled vehicle not operated exclusively upon railroad tracks and any
vehicle propelled or drawn by a self-propelled vehicle.
Noise: Any sound not occurring in the natural environment, including, but not limited to, sounds
emanating from aircraft and highways, and industrial, commercial, and residential sources.
Noise Pollution is:
(a) Noise which unreasonably annoys, injures or endangers the safety, health,
morals, comfort or repose of any considerable number of members of the public,
or
(b) The presence of a noise or combination of noises exceeding the source sound
levels hereinafter set forth, or
(c) An act enumerated herein as a public nuisance.
Person: Any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, trustee, association, the state and its
agencies and subdivisions, or any body of persons, whether incorporated or not and with
respect to acts prohibited or required herein shall include employees and licensees, owners,
tenants, and occupants.
Sound: An oscillation in pressure, stress, particle displacement, particle velocity, etc., in an
elastic or partially elastic medium, or the superposition of such prorogated alterations.
Sound Amplification Equipment: A radio, phonograph, or any device or apparatus for the
reproduction or amplification of the human voice or other sounds.
Sound Level: A weighted sound pressure level obtained by the use of a sound level meter
having characteristics, including the "A" weighting, as specified in A.N.S.I. Specifications for
Sound Level Meters, S1. 4-1971. The reference pressure is 20 micronewtons per square
meter.
Sound Pressure Level: Expressed in dB, is 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of
the pressure of a sound to the reference pressure (20 micronewtons per square meter).
Sound Receiving Unit: A unit of property or a building containing a person, business, activity,
animal life, or property which is affected by noise or noise pollution.
Vibration: Refers to the oscillation of a solid body or material, including, but not limited to, earth,
concrete, machinery, building structures, or other similar materials. Within this chapter the term
vibration shall refer to those oscillations which are disturbing, injurious, damaging, or
dangerous.
Ord. No. 2589 09/08/81
Chapter 39 – Page 2 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
39.03 SOURCE REQUIREMENTS
(a) The source sound level requirements of this section shall apply at the property or
zoning lines of the sound receiving unit. Measurements may be made at any
location in zoning districts for evaluation purposes and to aid in the enforcement
of other sections of this chapter.
(b) The source sound levels as stated below in subsection (c) shall be the highest
source levels permitted in each zoning district.
(c) Source requirements:
Ord. No. 3788 04/06/2009
Ord. No. 4115 10/07/2019
Day Night
Zoning District
(7 a.m. – 10 p.m.) (10 p.m. - 7 a.m.)
L50 L10 L50 L10
R-S, R-R, R-1.5 60 65 50 55
R-1, R-2, R-3,AG/NR 60 65 50 55
MU-DC, MU-DF, MU-N, 65 70 65 70
B-1, B-2, B-3
I-1, I-2 75 80 75 80
(d) Sound levels resulting from travel of motor vehicles on state and county
highways are exempt from these noise source requirements but not other
sections of this chapter relating to motor vehicles operated in other areas. It is
the intent of the city to reduce highway noise in the various land areas
surrounding highways to or below the source requirements of this section when
and wherever possible.
(e) All sound levels originating in any development or property which contains one or
more buildings and which is without property lines for each building shall not
exceed the source requirements for the applicable zoning district measured at
the area of human activity, or if this is ill-defined, at any point on a line, all of
whose points are equidistant from any two buildings.
39.04 MOTOR VEHICLE SOUND LEVEL REQUIREMENTS
A motor vehicle operated or driven on any highway within the city shall comply with noise
standards of the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulations 169.69 (Mufflers)
and 169.693 (Motor Vehicle Noise Limits) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NPC 4
(Motor Vehicle Noise Limits - 1977) are adopted and incorporated by reference. Three copies
of each of these laws and regulations shall be on file in the office of the city clerk and each copy
shall be marked "Official Copy."
39.04.1 PROHIBITIONS
No person shall cause, allow or permit noise pollution except governmental agencies or bodies
or public utilities.
Chapter 39 – Page 3 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
39.04.2 NOISY PARTIES AND GATHERINGS
(1) Prohibition. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. congregate
at, or participate in any party or gathering of two or more people from which noise
emanates of a sufficient volume so as to disturb the peace, quiet, or repose of another
person. No person shall knowingly remain at such a noisy party or gathering.
(a) Evidence. Noise of such volume as to be clearly audible at a distance of 50 feet
from the structure or building in which the party or gathering is occurring; or in the
case of apartment buildings, in the adjacent hallway or apartment, shall be prima
facie evidence of a violation of this section.
(b) Duty to Disperse. When a police officer determines that a party or gathering is in
violation of this section, the officer may order all persons present at the premises
where the violation is occurring, other than the owner or tenants of the premises,
to disperse immediately. No person shall knowingly remain at such a party or
gathering.
(c) Exceptions. The following are exempt from a violation of this section:
(i) Activities which are duly authorized, sponsored or licensed by the City of
Winona, so long as the activity is conducted pursuant to the conditions of
the license, permit or contract authorizing such activity;
(ii) Church bells, chimes or carillons; and
(iii) Persons who have gone to a party for the sole purpose of abating the
violation.
(d) Penalties. Every owner or tenant of the premises where a party or gathering in
violation of this section occurs, who is present at such party or gathering, is guilty
of a misdemeanor. Any person who refuses to disperse from a party or gathering
in violation of this section after being ordered by a police officer to do so, is guilty
of a misdemeanor.
(e) Enforcement. The Police Department shall be charged with the responsibility of
enforcing this section.
(2) Owner’s Liability. For purposes of this section, owner is defined to include corporations
and partnerships as well as individual owners.
(a) The owner of a licensed residential structure constituting one or more buildings
(licensed premises) shall be responsible to cause persons occupying a rental
dwelling unit situated within the licensed premises to conduct themselves in such
a manner so as to not cause the licensed premises to be in violation of the
prohibition against noisy parties and gatherings set forth in Section 39.04.2 of
this Code.
Chapter 39 – Page 4 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
(b) Upon determination by the Police that the licensed premises or any rental
dwelling unit within such were used in a manner in violation of Section 39.04.2,
the Department of Community Development shall notify the owner and manager
by regular mail of such violation and direct the owner and manager to take steps
to prevent further violations at the licensed premises.
(c) If another violation of the noise pollution regulations occurs at the licensed
premises within twelve (12) months of an incident for which notice provided in
subsection (b) of this section was given, the owner and manager shall be notified
of the subsequent violation by the Department of Community Development and
shall be required to submit a written report of actions taken by the owner and/or
manager to eliminate future violations of the noise pollution ordinance. This
written report shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development
within five (5) days, excluding intervening weekends and holidays, of the notice
of violation, and shall detail all actions taken by the owner and/or the manager in
response to all notices of violations at the licensed premises within the preceding
twelve (12) months.
(d) Further violations of the noise pollution regulations shall be dealt with as follows:
(i) On licensed premises where a single rental dwelling unit is located, if
another violation of the noise pollution regulations occurs on the licensed
premises within twelve (12) months after receipt of notice pursuant to
subsection (b), the city council may impose a civil fine not to exceed
$1,000 and, additionally, the rental housing license may be suspended or
revoked for such dwelling unit.
(ii) On licensed premises where the licensed residential structure contains
two or more rental dwelling units, if three violations of the noise pollution
regulations have occurred in one rental dwelling unit or if four violations of
the noise pollution regulations have occurred on the licensed premises
within twelve (12) months after receipt of notice pursuant to subsection
(b), the city council may impose the following sanctions. If three
violations of the noise pollution regulations have occurred in one rental
dwelling unit within such twelve (12) month period of time, the City
Council may impose a civil fine not to exceed $1,000 and, additionally,
the rental housing license for such rental dwelling unit may be suspended
or revoked. If four violations of the noise pollution regulations have
occurred on the licensed premises within such twelve (12) month period
of time, the City Council may impose a civil fine not to exceed $1,000
and, additionally, the rental housing license may be suspended or
revoked for the licensed premises.
(e) Any decision to suspend or revoke a license or impose a civil fine shall be made
by the City Council in accordance with the notice and hearing requirements of
Section 51.03 of this Code.
(f) The rental housing license may be reinstated by the Department of Community
Development after suspension or revocation or payment of a fine by the licensee,
upon receipt of payment to the City of a reinstatement fee as set forth in Chapter
51 of this Code.
Chapter 39 – Page 5 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
(g) No suspension or revocation shall be imposed for a violation of section (1) which
occurred during the pendency of eviction proceedings (unlawful detainer) or
within Thirty (30) days, or such other time period required by the lease, of notice
given by the owner or manager to a tenant to vacate the premises, where the
violation related to or occurred in the unit for which eviction proceedings were
undertaken or notice to vacate was given. Eviction proceedings shall not be a
bar to sanctions pursuant to this section unless the owner or manager provides a
notarized copy to the Department of Community Development at the time of
delivery to the tenants. No action shall be taken under this section against an
owner who was himself/herself, or through his/her agent, the complainant on the
underlying violation of Section 39.04.2. The owner or manager shall provide and
maintain at the Department of Community Development a current listing of all
managers, caretakers or agents to verify the preceding.
(h) All written leases for licensed rental housing premises which shall be in effect
after August 1, 2001, shall contain a clause providing that conduct which would
be violative of subsection (a) of this section, shall constitute a material breach of
the lease and grounds for termination of such lease.
(i) It shall be irrelevant to proceedings hereunder that the dwelling owner or others
were not criminally prosecuted or were acquitted of criminal charges for the
incidents serving as the basis of the suspension or revocation, but a prerequisite
to any action by the City Council hereunder shall be the arrest of either the
dwelling owner or of others in attendance at a party or gathering.
(j) Any person, firm, corporation or partnership that shall violate section (1) shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor. Each violation of this section shall constitute a separate
offense.
Ord. 3530 06/03/02
39.05 DECLARATION OF NUISANCES
The following acts are declared to be public nuisances:
(a) The use of sound amplification equipment between the hours of 10:00 o'clock
p.m. and 8:00 o'clock a.m.
(1) In Lake Park, or
(2) On any other public property not included in (1) hereof, provided, the use
of sound amplification equipment is not a public nuisance if the sound
produced cannot be heard on adjacent property, or
(3) In any other area of the city, provided, the use of sound amplification
equipment is not a public nuisance if the sound produced cannot be
heard beyond the property lines of the property from which the sound
emanates.
(b) The use of sound amplification equipment emitting music between the hours of
8:00 o'clock a.m. and 10:00 o'clock p.m. in Lake Park, provided the use of sound
Chapter 39 – Page 6 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
amplification equipment emitting music is not a public nuisance if the sound
produced cannot be heard beyond the boundaries of Lake Park.
(c) Noise on any street adjacent to any school, learning institution, religious
institution, or court, or adjacent to any hospital, or home for the aged, or other
similar institution which interferes with the working of such institution or disturbs
or annoys an inhabitant in the institution, provided that conspicuous signs
indicating the presence of such institutions or buildings are displayed near streets
by such institutions.
(d) The operation of any motor vehicle or any minibike or motorbike or other similar
vehicle or device in any way which results in the squealing of tires or other
unnecessary noise on any highway, private road, public or private parking lot,
driveway, or other property in the city, except when there is reason to do so for
safe operation.
(e) Repairing, building, rebuilding, running, operating or testing any motor vehicle or
other internal combustion engine in such a manner to create unnecessary noise.
(f) The operation of any radio receiving set, tape or disc player, musical instrument,
phonograph or other machine or device for the producing or reproducing of
sound in such manner, considering the time and place and the purpose for which
the sound is produced, so as to disturb the peace, quiet or repose of a person or
persons of ordinary sensibilities.
(1) The play, use or operation of any radio, tape or disc player, musical
instrument, phonograph or other machine or device for the production or
reproduction of sound in such a manner as to be plainly audible at a
distance of fifty feet from such machine or device shall be prima facie
evidence of a violation of this section.
(2) When sound violating this section is produced or reproduced by a
machine or device that is located in or on a vehicle, the vehicle's owner is
guilty of the violation, provided, however, that if the vehicle's owner is not
present at the time of the violation the person in charge or control of the
vehicle at the time of the violation is guilty of the violation.
(3) This section shall not apply to sound procured by the following:
(i) Amplifying equipment used in connection with activities which are
authorized, sponsored or permitted by the City, so long as the
activity is conducted pursuant to the conditions of the license,
permit, or contract authorizing such activity;
(ii) Church bells, chimes or carillons;
(iii) School bells;
(iv) Anti-theft devices; or
Chapter 39 – Page 7 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
(v) Machines or devices for the production of sound on or in
authorized emergency vehicles.
(4) With the exception of the machines or devices listed in subsection (3)
above, this subdivision shall apply to all radios, tape and disc players,
musical instruments, phonographs, and machines and devices for the
production or reproduction of sound, whether on public or private
property.
Ord. No. 3336 04/07/97 Ord. No. 3449 05/01/00
39.05.1 PERMIT
Any person desiring to utilize sound amplification equipment contrary to the provisions of this
Code may do so if permitted by the City Council. Application to the City Council shall be made
at least two weeks in advance. Permission shall be granted only to (a) bona fide club,
charitable organization, or non-profit organization conducting a community-wide celebration or
event, or (b) a person or organization desiring to exercise the right of free speech. Permission
shall not be granted for a period of time extending beyond 1:00 o'clock a.m. on weekdays and
midnight on Sundays. Permission shall be granted only for a definite period of time and for a
definite area. The permit shall require that the permittee have present at all times a person who
will monitor sound levels to be sure that they are within permissible limits. In each case the City
Council shall consider the impact on the public welfare and safety of persons in the vicinity and
throughout the community. The Council may impose any reasonable conditions suitable for the
particular occasion.
Ord. No. 2589 09/08/81
39.06 REGULATIONS FOR TESTING AND MEASUREMENT
The director of the department of community development or other authorized person as
provided in writing by the city manager shall adopt regulations which shall define in precise
detail the test procedures and instrumentation to be utilized in the enforcement of this chapter.
These regulations shall cover such matters as procedures for making certain tests and
measurements, and the type of instrumentation being used in the enforcement of this chapter.
Such regulations and any amendments thereto shall be effective upon the filing of a copy with
the city clerk who shall endorse thereon a date and time of filing.
39.07 INSPECTIONS
A city official shall inspect existing or potential noise, noise pollution, and vibration sources, and
noise pollution control measures as frequently as may be necessary to insure compliance with
this chapter.
39.08 ACCESS TO PREMISES AND RECORDS
The person on the premises who is responsible for any noise pollution control measure or
allowing or causing any noise, noise pollution, or vibration shall, upon request of the city official,
permit access to all parts of the area at any reasonable time for purposes of inspection and
monitoring and shall exhibit and allow copying of any records relating to noise, noise pollution,
or vibration, or noise pollution control as is necessary to determine compliance with this chapter.
Chapter 39 – Page 8 Last updated 12/04/2019
CHAPTER 39
A city official shall be permitted access to any sound receiver unit affected by a sound source
under inspection in order to determine compliance with this chapter.
39.09 INTERFERENCE WITH OR HINDRANCE OF A CITY OFFICIAL
No person shall interfere with or hinder the city official in the performance of duties nor prevent
the performance thereof.
39.10 REMOVAL AND CORRECTION OF VIOLATIONS
A person responsible for noise, noise pollution, or vibrations control measures, who allows or
causes noise, noise pollution, or vibration and who has received a written inspection report from
the city official giving notification of one or more violations of this chapter shall correct or remove
each violation within the length of time set by the city official. The length of time for the
correction or removal of each violation shall be stated on the inspection report. The failure to
remove or correct each such violation within the time period noted on the inspection report shall
constitute a separate violation of this chapter.
39.11 APPEAL
Any person affected by any order under this chapter or by any action taken in accordance with
this chapter, including, but not limited to, an applicant for temporary noise permit, extension of
compliance date or a person objecting to such applications may, within 10 days of the issuance
of the order or action, appeal to the city manager. Appeals shall be held no sooner than 10
days and not more than 30 days after a request for such appeal is filed unless good cause is
shown for an extension. Requests shall be made by filing with the city manager a notice of
appeal specifying the grounds and relief sought. The city manager shall forthwith set a date,
time, and place for the appeal and shall notify the person appealing at least 10 days in advance
of the appeal date.
Any person affected by a decision of the city manager may appeal the decision to the city
council. A notice of appeal to the city council must be filed with the city clerk within 5 days after
the decision of the city manager. Notice of the date, time, place and nature of the matter under
consideration shall be given by publication at least once in the official newspaper not less than
10 days prior to the appeal.
39.12 PENALTY
Any person violating these provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. As an
additional remedy, any violation of these sections may be subject to abatement, injunction, or
other appropriate action issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. Each day a violation
continues to exist shall constitute a separate violation.
Chapter 39 – Page 9 Last updated 12/04/2019
Get email alerts for Winona
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.