Parks & Natural Resources Commission

Parks and Natural Resources Commission Meeting Agenda March 7, 2023 | 7 p.m. Ash North/South Conference Room City Hall, 8301 Valley Creek Road The March 7, Parks and Natural Resources Commission Meeting is taking place in-person and virtually at City Hall in the Ash North and South Conference Rooms. Members of the public may attend the meeting using a computer, tablet or smartphone and accessing the virtual meeting link at woodburymn.gov/VirtualMeetings. Public comments will be accepted during the meeting both in-person and virtually. Virtual questions should be submitted via the online Q&A feature within the virtual meeting link. Questions regarding the meeting will also be taken between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at 651-714-3583 or at RecOnline@woodburymn.gov. Questions received after 4:30 p.m., will be responded to in the next three to seven business days. *Please note that all agenda times are estimates 7:00* 1. Call to Order 7:00 2. Open Forum 7:05 3. Approval of the Minutes – February 7, 2023 7:10 4. Stormwater Project Update – Memorandum No. 23 – 06 7:30 5. Park at Canvas North Concept Plan Approval – Memorandum No. 23 – 07 7:40 6. Goose Management Plan – Memorandum No. 23 – 08 8:00 7. Discussion Items 1 A. Current Projects – Status Update B. Environmental Stewardship Strategic Initiative 8:10 8. Monthly Update – Memorandum No. 23 - 09 8:15 9. Council Report – Councilmember Santini 8:25 10. Announcements/Miscellaneous 8:30 11. Adjourn If a Commission member cannot attend this meeting, please contact Belinda Reed at 651-714-3584 by Monday, March 6, 2023. Thank you. The City of Woodbury is subject to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities. The City is committed to full implementation of the Act to our services, programs, and activities. Information regarding the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act is available from the City Administrator's office at 651- 714-3500. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 72 hours in advance of an event. Please call the ADA Coordinator, at 651-714-3500 (TDD 651-714-3568) to make arrangements. 1 Discussion and status updates are intended to be informational or of brief inquiry. More substantial discussion of matters under status updates and miscellaneous should be scheduled for a future agenda.  City of Woodbury Woodbury City Hall 8301 Valley Creek Road Woodbury, MN 55125 651-714-3583 Minutes of Parks and Natural Resources Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Commission Members Present: Anna Doherty, Charles Eckberg, Bruce Montgomery (Co-chair), Deborah Musser (Chair), Edward Myatt, Wallace Wadd, Noah Yehalashet Commission Member(s) Absent: Commissioner Timothy Brewington Councilmember: Councilmember Jennifer Santini Staff Present: Michelle Okada, Parks and Recreation Director Josh Kinney, Parks Planner Jennifer McLoughlin, Sr. Environmental Resources Coordinator Eric Searles, Assistant Community Development Director/City Planner Reed Smidt, Recreation Manager Belinda Reed, Recording Secretary Staff Virtual: Jodi Sauro, Parks and Recreation Coordinator 1. Call to Order Chair Musser called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Introductions Ms. Okada welcomed the Commissioners to the first 2023 meeting. Introductions were made with each Commissioner sharing a little bit about themselves, as well as what interested each to volunteer to serve on the advisory commission: Parks and Natural Resources Commission (PNRC). Staff members present shared their backgrounds and positions with the City. 3. Open Forum Member(s) of the public were in attendance in-person and virtually. 4. Special Order of Business A. Councilmember Santini administered the Oath of Office to new Commission members: Anna Doherty, Charles Eckberg, Edward Myatt and Student Commissioner Noah Yehalashet. 5. Action Items A. December 6, 2022, Parks and Natural Resources Commission Meeting Minutes Parks and Natural Resources Commission Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 2 Chair Musser asked for the approval of the Minutes of the December 6, 2022, meeting of the Parks and Natural Resources Commission. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by Commissioner Wadd, to approve the December 6, 2022, Parks and Natural Resources Commission Minutes. Vote: In favor All Against None Absent Commissioner Brewington 6. Westwind Development – Memorandum No. 23 – 01 Ms. Okada introduced Assistant Community Development Director/City Planner, Eric Searles, noting Mr. Searles would be guiding the Commissioner through the development process. Mr. Searles provided a brief history of the Master Plan, which guides the development process highlighting the location of the Westwind Development. In September of 2021, following review and support from the PNRC, the City Council approved the South of Dale Master Plan. Mr. Searles noted that the Master Plan guides decisions for development with infrastructure needs, including parks and open spaces. Mr. Searles noted that the development is being brought before the PNRC to provide opportunity to review the development proposal as it relates to the park dedication, park and trails issues and pedestrian and bike access. Mr. Searles highlighted the trails and sidewalks throughout the development noting loops and strong connections to the citywide network, location of the park and wetlands, and the greenway corridor. Discussion ensued with regard to criteria used to establish how big the park should be in relation to number of residents served. It was noted that in the Comprehensive Plan, there is guidance on the types of park space and park proximity, with the goal of having park or open space sites within ½ mile of residents, this includes other public amenities such as schools. With the number of park spaces proposed in the Master Plan, the process looks at how each park area supports the overall park system needs, versus making a standard of having a certain acre size in any one location. Mr. Searles highlighted the FAA weather tower location, which communicates with the airport, in relation to the Westwind Development, noting the tower has been in that location for several years. With regard to ordinances and regulations that apply to the park development, Mr. Searles noted that during the process, any items that are not meeting the ordinances or are requesting flexibility of an ordinance, staff will bring any non-compliance to be reviewed by the Commission. It was noted that Commissioners are not obligated to be experts in all the policies or ordinances of the community; rather, their role is when there is flexibility to policy, to provide guidance in that matter. Chair Musser called for a motion. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Montgomery, seconded by Commissioner Myatt, to affirm that the proposed park and trail network, within the Westwind subdivision is consistent with the adopted policies, ordinances, regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan, as they relate to park dedication, park and trail issues, and pedestrian and bicycling access. Parks and Natural Resources Commission Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 3 Vote: In favor All Against None Absent Commissioner Brewington 7. Environmental Stewardship – Memorandum No. 23 – 02 Ms. Okada provided the background with regard to the 2022 PNRC work on drafting the strategic initiative that was presented and approved by the City Council as one of the Council’s strategic initiatives for the next two-year period. Ms. Okada noted that a monthly update, on the project, will be included as part of each PNRC meeting going forward. Ms. Okada introduced Senior Environmental Resources Coordinator, Jennifer McLoughlin. Ms. McLoughlin noted that the Project Charter, is used for larger City projects, to not only clarify and define the project purpose and summarize the objectives, but also identify staff to be involved with working on the project, as well as outlining project milestones and timelines. The Project Scope focuses on City programs that the City has control over, with regard to City policies, not necessarily regional, state or federal regulations. It was noted that currently, the project is on track with the timeline outlined in the initiative. Ms. Okada noted that the recommended consultant will be reviewed by the PNRC for its stamp of approval, prior to being presented to the City Council for their final approval, including budget approval. It was noted that robust community engagement is being planned in order to identify the priorities of the community as a whole. A discussion ensued about a desire to hire a consultant, to help guide us through the work that would require specialization in community engagement, offering different opportunities to participate in the community engagement with stakeholder mapping, to make sure we are reaching as many residents as possible. Ms. Okada noted that the PNRC will have different touch points throughout the process. Ms. McLoughlin noted that the Implementation Plan will be based on the environmental stewardship plan, based on the Environmental Strategic initiative. There was consensus from the PNRC affirming the Project Charter and Project Scope. 8. Park at Canvas North Concept Plan – Memorandum No. 23 – 03 Ms. Okada noted that now that the development is occurring, the development of the park planned for that park space is next. Mr. Kinney noted the location of the public park, located on .7 acres, and will provide inter- connectivity with trail and sidewalk access to and from surrounding neighborhoods. It was noted that the park name has not yet been determined; it is being reviewed by the Park Lands and Recreational Facilities Naming Advisory Committee, along with a few other park locations. Ms. Kinney highlighted the amenities proposed, which have been prioritized for the park space, including dual lined tennis/pickleball court, playground, picnic area, benches, trees for shade and native plantings to provide pollinator habitat and enhanced storm water quality. Parking for the park was identified along Conifer Pass. Parks and Natural Resources Commission Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 4 There was PNRC consensus with the concept plan for the park. 9. La Lake Park Concept Plan – Memorandum No. 23 – 04 Mr. Kinney highlighted the 76.62 acre park location describing the park as consisting of mostly upland and the lake itself, with access off of Bailey Road and Military Road, noting use of the park has increased over time. The site offers not only unique characteristics, but all opportunities to enhance and promote the natural setting. The rural area near La Lake, with larger lots, was described as a less served park and trail area of the City. In planning the development of this space, Mr. Kinney noted that the process, which includes addressing the needs, desires and opportunities, has included both public and internal engagement with two open houses having been held: December 6, 2022 and January 11, 2023, at which there was support for the project and amenities being considered. It was noted that features that people are looking for in the park include enough parking, access to running water and restroom. The park development will also include addressing drainage issues and storm water management. The Commission reviewed the concept plan as presented. Mr. Kinney noted that the park would remain intact, with amenities to be incorporated into the space. Some of the project priorities that had been identified including a larger open-air shelter, wayfinding and interpretation and a permeable parking lot. Part of the presentation included a drawing of an open-air shelter (A frame) with a fire pit in a more remote area of the park, which would be accessed by hiking into the area. The park development is anticipated to be completed in phases. A discussion ensued with regard to the steep/cliff grade shore area on the lake, woodland, plants and animals. It was noted that horse hoof imprints have been observed at the park. Staff verified that horse riding is prohibited as outlined in the Parks and Recreation Chapter of the City Code: Animals 16.51. Mr. Kinney noted that staff has been working closely with the environmental staff during the design phase studying the drainage issues with the existence of high flows of water, with a natural outlet but no rate control on the outlet, with the flow to the west toward Ria Lake, south into Newport. Ms. Okada encouraged the Commissioners to visit and experience the park during each of the four seasons. It was suggested that consideration be made to include electric car charging in the parking area. A native prairie with natural, flowers blooming to attract different animals, birds, insects to create an evolving experience, was mentioned. Although providing accessible trails for all individuals, it was also noted that there is a desire for soft-surface, natural trails as well. A suggestion was made to install larger and more prominent park signage to identify La Lake Park. There was Commission consensus affirming the concept of the park plan and amenities being considered. 10. Discussion Items 1 1 Discussion and updates are intended to be informational or of brief inquiry. More substantial discussion of matter under status updates and miscellaneous should be scheduled for a future agenda. Parks and Natural Resources Commission Minutes February 7, 2023 Page 5 A. Current Projects – Status Update It was noted that construction of a number of projects in the parks will take place in the spring. Ms. Okada highlighted the Angel of Hope memorial noting staff are working with the citizen group on the memorial to honor children that have passed, that will be located near the Veterans and Public Safety memorials. A formal agreement with the Woodbury Community Foundation will be presented to the City Council for approval, prior to a ground-breaking in the spring. 11. Monthly Update – Memorandum No. 23 – 05 Ms. Okada noted that staff is busy behind the scenes planning for the upcoming year. 12. Council Report – Councilmember Santini Councilmember Santini noted the City Council is in full swing and work continues on the water project with its number of touch points before the Council. 13. Announcements/Miscellaneous Ms. Okada noted the Consent to Release Data forms provided to the Commissioners by the City Clerk’s office, are due back on Friday, Feb. 10. Ms. Okada noted that the monthly agendas are anticipated to be robust, and will include Environmental Stewardship monthly touch points. The Commissioners joined Chair Musser in congratulating Recreation Manager, Reed Smidt on being awarded the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association’s (MRPA) Jack Niles award, which recognizes a male professional member of the MRPA, with 10 plus years of professional experience and outstanding service to the parks and recreation field, and to the MRPA, along with Mr. Okada having been named President-elect of that organization for 2024. The Commission discussed how they would prefer the meeting room set-up for upcoming monthly meetings with either continuing to have one person per table, or seat two at each table, side by side. The consensus was to have two seated, side by side per table. 14. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ________________________________ Belinda Reed Administrative Assistant Approved by the Parks and Natural Resources Commission on March 7, 2023.  City of Woodbury Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Natural Resources Commission Memorandum 23 – 06 March 7, 2023 Parks and Natural Resources Commission Members: Subject: Stormwater Project Update The City of Woodbury Environmental Division has partnered with South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) for design and construction of two regional stormwater best management practices: Wilmes Lake Alum Treatment Facility and Hasenbank Stormwater Park. City Council and SWWD Board action will be sought in the upcoming months for construction to begin on these projects spring/summer 2023. The Hasenbank Stormwater Park was brought to the Commission December 6, 2022, and will not be brought back to this commission prior to construction. The Wilmes Lake Alum Treatment Facility will be constructed within Kargel Park, along the trail extending from Brookview Road cul-de-sac to the trail south of Tamarack Road. The watershed is funding the project in full, the City will take ownership and operation when construction is complete. This facility is an active stormwater treatment facility, in which stormwater will be pumped from the inlet of Wilmes Lake to a well house where Alum is added. The water is discharged into a settling pond before entering to Wilmes Lake. This facility is $1.5-2 million to construct and requires ongoing operation and maintenance during the spring, summer and fall. SWWD is committed to annually fund operation of the facility (i.e. Alum deliveries, electricity, etc.) as well as the City staff time associated with operation via quarterly reimbursement. The estimated staff time is 0.4 Full Time Equivalent per year within the Public Works - Streets Division. The Alum facility is estimated to remove 95-283 pounds of phosphorus from the watershed before outletting into Wilmes Lake. Water flows through Wilmes Lake at a relatively quick rate compared to other lakes in the area that improving water quality in this location may result in and improvement to downstream resources. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Kristin Seaman Environmental Resources Coordinator Attachment: Wilmes Lake Alum Facility Stormwater Project Update Wilmes Lake Alum Facility Wilmes Lake Alum Facility • First active stormwater treatment facility in Woodbury • $1.5-2 million investment by SWWD • 95-283 lbs Total Phosphorus per growing season • Season’s Park Stormwater Filter is 5-10 lbs Total Phosphorus per growing season  Tamarack Road Location Kargel Park Proposed Alum Treatment Location Wilmes Lake Kargel Park Stormwater wet pond • Water from here flows south • Improvement higher in the watershed benefit many waterbodies  City of Woodbury Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Natural Resources Commission Memorandum 23 – 07 March 7, 2023 Parks and Natural Resources Commission Members: Subject: Park at Canvas North Concept Plan Approval The concept plan, was previously reviewed at the February 7, 2023, Parks and Natural Resources Commission meeting, with no changes to the concept plan suggested. Recommendation Staff recommends the Parks and Natural Resources Commission approve the concept plan for the park at Canvas North Project as presented. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Josh Kinney Parks Planner Attachment: Park at Canvas North Concept Plan Park at Canvas North Concept Design February 7, 2023  City Of Woodbury Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Natural Resources Commission Memorandum 23 - 08 March 7, 2023 Parks and Natural Resources Commission Members: Subject: Goose Management Update Canadian Geese over population has become problematic in the City throughout the years, especially at Eagle Valley Golf Course (EVGC), Carver Lake Beach, and private business areas like Tamarack Village. Current Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) guidelines require that the City have a Goose Management Plan in place, that has been approved by the governing body, in this case the City Council and the DNR, in order to address the over population. As noted at the November 1, 2022, Parks and Natural Resources Commission (PNRC) meeting, discussions are ongoing regarding the large geese population in the City, and their adverse effects on water bodies, lawns, trails and sidewalks. Current research has indicated that nesting numbers have been increasing but, unfortunately, do not necessarily correspond to the areas of concern within the City like EVGC, and other public areas. Currently EVGC staff has completed an effort to addle or disturb the eggs from hatching in an attempt to decrease the numbers of geese on the fairways. Due to the limited number of nests found in these public spaces, the current approach is not significantly reducing the population. Background - Canada geese use various areas of Woodbury for feeding and nesting adjacent to lakes, marshes, and ponds within the City. Adult geese and their newly hatched families tend to loiter and feed in the areas that provide grassy lawn turf near open water bodies. The numerousness stormwater ponds in residential and commercial areas provide excellent habitat. In addition to the public and recreational spaces, schools, athletic fields, golf courses, homeowners or homeowner associations may also be impacted by excessive numbers of geese. By mid-summer and into fall, geese tend to congregate in significant numbers at various locations throughout the city. Beginning in 2020, and 2021, the City contracted for a consultant to conduct nest searching and egg addling. Based on this information gathered from a limited/select research area, it was estimated that 50 nesting pairs of geese (100 geese) nesting within Woodbury, resulted in a summer population of 400 (adults and goslings) geese. Fall populations have not been estimated, but geese numbers do increase significantly in the fall due to migration. The Issue - Canada geese cause concerns in the following ways: • Excessive fecal deposits on open grass and trails • Aggressive behavior toward humans and pets • Potential public safety concerns due to traffic accidents • Potential water quality issues associated with high e-coli counts • Approved Goose Management Plan is necessary to allow for more options related to goose control strategies Current Goose Management Strategy Status • Goose egg addling took place in a few parks, open spaces and the Eagle Valley Golf Course 2020, and 2021 Parks and Natural Resources Commission Memorandum 23 – 08 March 7, 2023 Page | 2 • Counts from 2022, were compiled from various locations • Draft Goose Management Plan completed in 2022 • Analyze data and craft a Goose Management Plan for consideration in 2023 Next Steps – • December 2022 - Finalize the draft plan • February 2023 - Submit plan to DNR - initial review • After DNR Review - Post plan on City website -Parks Projects and Eagle Valley Golf Course pages • March – Review by PNRC, recommend to City Council • April - Submit plan for City Council consideration • May – Submit final plan to DNR for approval • Annually-consider various goose management strategies based on area and impact • Consider a Community Goose Management Education Program Recommendation Staff recommends the Parks and Natural Resources Commission review the draft Goose Management Plan and recommend for City Council approval. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Josh Kinney Parks Planner Attachment: DRAFT-Goose Management Plan  TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Woodbury Goose Management Concerns 1.1 Canada Goose Habitat Use and Population Estimate 1.2 Concentrated Habitat Use and Human Use Conflicts 1.2.1 Proximity Sensitive Areas 1.2.2 Water Quality Impacts 1.2.3 Water Quality Sampling 2.0 Canada Goose Management Recommendations 2.1 Goals and Measures 2.2 Geographic Scope 2.3 Management Techniques 2.3.1 Habitat Management 2.3.2 Population Management 2.3.3 Management Techniques to be Implemented 2.4 Public Information 2.5 Partner Relationships and Permit Requirements Appendices: Appendix A- Woodbury City Map Appendix B- Woodbury Nest/Egg and Summer Survey Summary Appendix C -Management Activity Tracking Form 1. Woodbury Goose Management Concerns 1.1 Canada Goose Habitat Use and Population Estimate The City of Woodbury is a first-tier suburb east of St. Paul. Woodbury is home to over 75,000 residents and covers 36 square miles. Woodbury is a residential community with the predominate land use residential developments. Commercial centers, light industry and some agricultural land make up the remainder. Woodbury has an extensive park system (61 parks) and approximately 175 miles of trails adding to its appeal for residents. Due to the extensive residential development, it has approximately 700 storm water holding ponds located throughout the city. Canada geese use various areas of Woodbury throughout the year. Nesting occurs on and adjacent to lakes, marshes, and ponds within the city. Adults with newly hatched broods tend to loaf and feed in the areas that provide grassy lawn turf and open water bodies. The predominance of storm water holding ponds adjacent to residential and commercial areas with maintained lawns provide excellent brood rearing habitat. By mid-summer geese tend to congregate in significant numbers at retail centers and golf courses. In fall and spring migratory geese will utilize these same areas along with agricultural lands within the city. The City has contracted for a consultant to conduct nest searching and egg addling to reduce goose production at some limited sites within the city in 2020 and 2021. Appendix A is the 2020 report summary. Based on this information it is estimated 50 nesting pairs of geese (100 geese) nest within Woodbury resulting in a summer population of 400 (adults and goslings) geese. Fall populations have not been estimated, but geese numbers do increase significantly in the fall due to migrating geese. 1.2 Concentrated Habitat Use and Human Use Conflicts Canada geese cause concerns with fecal deposits on lawns and trails, aggressive behavior toward humans and pets, public safety concerns due to potential traffic accidents, and water quality issues associated with high e-coli counts. The primary areas of concern for geese in the summer are Eagle Valley Golf Course, the intersection of Radio Drive and Valley Creek Drive area, Tamarack Shopping Center (Radio Drive and Hudson Road), the intersection of Woodbury Drive and Commerce Drive area, and Coby Lake. Public safety related to traffic disruptions and potential accidents are of concern due to geese presence and crossing busy roadways. Geese crossing busy roadways has resulted in disruption of traffic flow and traffic accidents. Although accident data related to goose/traffic conflicts are not tracked specifically, inquiries made with Woodbury Public Safety do support the ongoing presence of hazards created by conflicts between traffic and the City’s goose population. 1.2.1 Proximity Sensitive areas In addition to the public and recreational spaces listed above there are schools, athletic fields, private golf courses, homeowner or homeowner associations that impacted by excessive numbers of geese. Fall and spring migration concentrations of non-resident geese can cause agricultural and turf management concerns. 1.2.2 Water Quality Impacts (if applicable) Water samples are taken weekly with intermittent closures yearly due to E Coli. Carver Park beach has been closed periodically due to presence of E-Coli. Besides traffic and depredation issues, water quality impacts are legitimate concerns. Water quality impacts are legitimate concerns related to Canada goose management. Canada geese are known to contribute to water pollution through feces, which contain high levels of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. When large numbers of geese congregate in an area, their feces can accumulate and create a buildup of these nutrients in the water, leading to algal blooms and other harmful water quality issues. In addition to nutrient pollution, Canada geese can also introduce harmful bacteria and pathogens into the water through their feces, which can be dangerous to both human and animal health. This is a particular concern in areas where people swim or engage in other water activities. To address these water quality concerns, wildlife managers often implement Canada goose management strategies, such as habitat modification, egg addling, and lethal control, to reduce the population of geese in an area and prevent the buildup of their feces. These strategies are aimed at achieving a balance between the ecological benefits that geese provide and the negative impacts they can have on the environment and human health. 1.2.3 Water Quality Sampling (if applicable) Water samples are taken weekly with intermittent closures yearly due to E Coli. 2. Canada Goose Management Recommendations 2.1 Goals and Measures The goal of this plan is to identify and reduce conflicts with Canada geese within the city of Woodbury. The goal is not to eliminate geese from the city, but to reduce actual or potential conflicts within the city. To meet this goal, the city will implement an integrated management approach including habitat and population management to reduce conflicts. This approach will focus on existing, or potential areas of conflicts, and identifying techniques that can be taken based on the conflict. Annual records will be maintained to measure success and problems. 2.2 Geographic Scope The City’s primary focus is on City properties (parks, trails, golf course), but it will encourage use of these techniques on private property as appropriate. This plan will also qualify private landowners to work with the City on goose management if they follow the techniques outlined in this plan. 2.3 Management Techniques Management techniques for Canada geese conflicts falls into two major types or objectives of management, they include habitat management and population management.  Habitat management includes techniques to discourage or eliminate access or use of areas by geese.  Population management includes techniques to reduce or limit the growth of local goose populations. Habitat management techniques are only successful if alternative goose habitat is available. These techniques do not eliminate the potential conflicts it redirects geese to areas where the conflict is reduced or acceptable. Population management techniques are used to reduce the overall production of geese and/or reduce the local population of geese. To implement the goal of reducing conflicts through an integrated management approach, both types of management should be considered. 2.3.1 Habitat Management  Landscaping to discourage goose access to an area by planting tall vegetative borders around ponds or edges of lawns.  Fencing to prevent or discourage access to an area. Fencing can include barrier fencing along with use of bird scare tape.  Hazing or harassment of geese using an area includes a person or a dog chasing geese and use of pyrotechnics where permitted.  Placement of predator decoys, noise making devices, flashing lights, and lasers to harass geese.  MN DNR (DNR) provides information on management of Canada geese for homeowners (Homeowners' Guide to Goose Problems (state.mn.us). Another good reference publication is entitled “Managing Canada Geese in Urban Environments, A Technical Guide” This publication is available from Cornell University at, http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/66 Further information on these techniques can be found in these resources and with consultation with DNR Wildlife Managers. Implementation of any technique will have to meet local requirements, laws, and regulations. 2.3.2 Population Management  Population management to reduce actual goose numbers in an area, includes egg treatment, summer trapping and removal, hazing, and hunting where permitted.  Egg treatment is a population control technique that reduces goose production by preventing goose eggs from hatching. It entails locating goose nests and either covering eggs with corn oil, puncturing, or shaking the eggs.  For further information on egg treatment see the USDA Publication canada_goose.pdf (usda.gov).  Summer removal is to be conducted in the summer, when the young geese have not gained flight feathers and the adults are molting their flight feathers preventing geese from flying.  During the timeframe (mid-June to mid-July) the geese are herded into a catch pen, captured, and removed from the area. Geese captured in the summer (per DNR Permit requirements) are processed for donation to local food shelfs and wildlife facilities. The summer removal is conducted by goose management companies that have met DNR requirements and have the proper permits.  The use of population management techniques may raise public concerns, but it should be noted that the DNR (and other states) do not allow the relocation of Canada geese, due to Canada geese being abundant resulting in ongoing conflicts in other areas.   These population management techniques seldom eliminate all the geese from an area, but they do reduce the level of conflicts significantly. These techniques can reduce conflicts for the summer or several years depending on potential for other geese to move into the area.  Summer removal of Canada geese has been conducted in the Twin Cities since 1982 and an estimated 125,000 geese have been removed using this technique.  Lethal removal of geese by means of shooting geese on an occasional basis is a management option. This option can be used in conjunction with hazing of geese or for problematic goose or geese causing significant public safety issues.  MN DNR permits are required to conduct these population management techniques.  Hunting harvest of geese in the fall is an effective technique and is encouraged if permitted (firearms ordinances allow) in the area. Citizens are encouraged to visit the City’s website or City Code to confirm locations where this might be permissible. MN DNR provides enhanced seasons for Canada goose hunting throughout MN to maintain Canada goose population goals. 2.3.3 Management Techniques to be Implemented. The city will continue its ongoing spring nest/egg treatment to reduce population growth as the need is determined. Summer removal of geese is an option the City will consider for locations with high summer brood numbers and/or where potential public safety impacts, water quality (e coli), property damage or significant nuisance concerns. Fall and spring migration is not of high concern currently but will be addressed as needed. The city may implement spring, summer, and fall Canada goose population surveys to provide ongoing measurements of goose numbers and effect of control methods. This plan can be updated to address any new goose conflicts, management techniques, or changes required. 2.4 Public Information Informing the public and users about Canada goose management activities is an integral part of a successful goose management plan. Information and signage detailing some of the methods being used may be developed to provide users with background information. Signage or posted notices may be developed for certain activities. Additionally, individual users will be notified of pending activities that might be considered alarming had they not received prior notice and explanation. Based on the information provided, it appears that the purpose of the notification is to ensure that the individuals are aware of the activities and understand the reason for them. By providing prior notice and explanation, individuals may be less likely to be alarmed or concerned about the actions being taken. All persons performing management activities should provide users with accurate and thorough information about our goose management objectives and inform users how the management activity being conducted fits into the larger Canada goose management plan. Additionally, they must be able to provide a copy of the removal permit to all users upon request. Where possible and appropriate, individuals may be notified of pending activities that might be considered alarming had they not received prior notice and explanation. This helps to promote transparency and understanding of the reasons behind the activities, as well as to alleviate any concerns that individuals might have. Providing prior notice and explanation can also allow for individuals to take appropriate measures to minimize any potential impacts on themselves, such as temporarily relocating their pets or avoiding the areas being managed. This can help reduce any negative consequences of the activities for both residents and the geese population. However, it is important to note that the decision to provide prior notice and explanation should be carried out on a case by case basis, taking into consideration factors such as the urgency of the management activity, the potential impact on public safety, and any legal requirements or regulations that may apply. In some cases, it may not be possible or appropriate to provide prior notice and explanation due to these factors. 2.5 Partner Relationships and Permit Requirements The city will cooperate with landowners, homeowner associations, local governmental agencies to address existing and potential goose conflicts. Woodbury will further consider a cost share option for private citizens and businesses as the plan becomes operational and effectiveness is quantified. Management techniques to be implemented will secure the necessary DNR permits prior to implementation. All management activities will be documented on the DNR Management Activity Tracking Form in Appendix B. and submitted to the area wildlife manager by September 10th of each year. The City will keep a copy of this on file to help facilitate future management activities that might need adjustments or improvements. 2.6 City Code City Code, Sec. 16-52. - Hunting, fishing and molesting wildlife. (a) No person shall kill, hunt, trap, pursue, injure, molest or unnecessarily disturb or have in possession any species of wildlife, including birds, waterfowl, fish or other animals found within the confines of any public site or open space without the written permission of the director, except that fishing and hunting may be permitted in designated areas subject to laws and regulations established by the state. (b) No person shall rob, disturb or molest the nest, eggs or young of any birds, or other animals within the confines of any public site or open space without the written permission of the director or designee and subject to laws and regulations established by the state. 2.7 City Contact Josh Kinney, PLA Parks Planner Joshua.kinney@woodburymn.gov 612-387-6260 Exhibit A. Map of Goose Conflict Areas in Woodbury MN. Exhibit B. Woodbury Nest/Egg and Summer Survey Summary 2020 Location Nests Eggs Summer Field Notes Legal Address Geese Survey # Woodbury/Tamarack 5 33 45 April 20, May 6 and 14. T28N 600 Drive (Target/Sam’s) Noted dozen goslings at R21W Woodbury target pond on May 6/14, 3 Drive Nests in storm water along Woodbury, parking lot of Health East and behind Sam’s. Lots of sign but no geese seen on July 3. Recheck and 45 seen on July 10. Tamarack Village 1 7 14 April 20, May 6 and 14. April T28N 8278 Shopping Center 20 noted 6 pair on Verizon R21W Tamarack Pond, 2 pair by Wendy’s and 4 Village 4 pair by Tap Room, but no nests or nesting behavior. Just the one nest next Tap Room. May 6 pairs gone, destroy eggs next Tap Room No geese seen on July 10 Rechecked and 13 seen on July 13 Eagle Valley Golf 0 0 60 April 20 and May 14. April T28N 2600 Course 20 counted 38 geese but no R21W Double nests or nesting behavior. Eagle Ln, May 14, 58 adults and 25 goslings (east of driving range) Again adults present but no nesting behavior. Assume most adults were non-breeders. July 3 seen 60 plus geese. Health East Sports 0 0 0 May 6, no geese seen, and T28N 4125 Center no nests found. R21W Radio Dr. July 3, no geese seen but noted sign near pond East of East Ridge HS. Valley 3 14 3 April 19, one nest at Vets T28N 8300 Creek/Radio/City Memorial but 20 other R21W Valley Hall geese around City Hall, but 16 Creek no nesting behavior. Other NW/NE Road pairs by Kwik trip and Library. May 6 one nest east on dike east of Associate Bank and noted 6 goslings library pond. July 10 sighted three geese NE quadrant, and again on July 13. Powers Lake Park 0 0 0 No geese seen or any sign, T28N 10000 and Lake lake has wooded open R21W Brookview shoreline with trail making it Rd poor goose nesting. June 11 no geese seen Odawa Park 0 0 0 April 19 pair present but no T28N 1270 nest, no geese or nesting on R21W Parkwood May 6 Dr July 11 no geese seen Shawnee Park/Battle 6 43 0 May 6 one depredated T28N 6515 Creek Lake nests and one hatched nest R21W Scheel but no goslings sighted. All 6 Drive nests on island found on NW/NE island. One nest had 11 eggs June 19 checked Battle Creek Lake by boat and no geese seen. Coby 5 18 16 April 20 All nests located on T28N 3100 Lake/Edgewater Park East side of lake on wooded R21W Edgewater points. 15 SE Drive July 11 16 geese seen Totals 20 115 138 Exhibit B. Woodbury Nest/Egg and Summer Survey Summary 2021 Exhibit B. Woodbury Nest/Egg and Summer Survey Summary 2022 Exhibit C: MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY DOCUMENTATION FORM DATE Time Name Activity/Method Location Notes  City of Woodbury Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Natural Resources Commission Memorandum 23 – 09 March 7, 2023 Eagle Valley Golf Course (EVGC) – Dan Moris As the calendar turns to March, it may still look like winter but staff is preparing for the start of another golf season. Major tasks currently taking place include recruiting a staff of approximately sixty seasonal employees, coordinating dates regarding the tournament schedule, finalizing our lesson program and prepping the golf shop to open on March 15. Staff within our maintenance department are in the final stages of completing scheduled winter maintenance on all the turf equipment and the fleet of sixty golf carts. It doesn’t look optimistic but the goal is to have all work completed by the middle of March in the event we have an early start to the season. M Health Fairview Sports Center (MHFV-SC) – Katie Ryden The outdoor rink closed for the season on March 1. Throughout the season, approximately 11,000 guests skated on our outdoor rink, with our highest numbers in December. 2022. The sports center is hosting its final winter season hockey tournaments and winter league soccer games throughout the month of March. Spring and summer ice schedules are filling quickly and we are already beginning to schedule 2023-2024 fall and winter seasons. Recreation Division – Reed Smidt Due to warm weather, the opening of the outdoor skating rinks at the neighborhood parks were delayed until January 7. Shortly after opening, above freezing temperatures and poor ice conditions required a closure from January 16-22. Hockey and pleasure skating rinks were open just under 40 days and closed for the season on February 22. The Pet Expo was held at Central Park on Saturday, Feb. 25. There were 12 vendors in attendance and approximately 500 visitors at the event. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michelle Okada Parks and Recreation Director