City Council
Regular MeetingWoodstock, IL · September 20, 2022
Minutes
MINUTES
WOODSTOCK CITY COUNCIL
September 20, 2022
City Council Chambers
A regular meeting of the Woodstock City Council was called to order at 7:00PM on Tuesday,
September 20, 2022 in the Council Chambers at Woodstock City Hall by Mayor Turner. He
explained the Consent Calendar process, invited public participation, and noted, as is the City’s
policy, this meeting is being live streamed with a recording archived should members of the public
wish to view it in the future.
A roll call was taken.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Darren Flynn, Lisa Lohmeyer, Tom Nierman, Wendy
Piersall, Bob Seegers, Jr., Gordon Tebo and Mayor Michael Turner.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: none
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roscoe Stelford, City Attorney Ruth Schlossberg, Deputy City
Manager/Executive Director of Strategy & Planning Paul Christensen, Executive Director of
Business Development Danielle Gulli, Executive Director of Operations Christina Betz, Building
and Zoning Director Joe Napolitano, City Planner Darrell Moore, Assistant Public Works Director
Brent Aymond, Grants Manager Willcockson, and City Clerk Cindy Smiley.
City Clerk Smiley confirmed the agenda is a true and correct copy of the published agenda.
III. FLOOR DISCUSSION
A. Presentation – Comprehensive Branding – North Star
Ms. Gulli stated the branding company, North Star, is in Woodstock this week doing the community
outreach portion of the comprehensive branding process. She introduced North Star’s
representative, Roberto Munoz.
Expressing his pleasure to be in Woodstock and present this evening, Mr. Munoz thanked the City
for the warm welcome they received. He stated they will be present in Woodstock until Thursday
helping Woodstock with the branding project.
Mr. Munoz then made a presentation entitled Woodstock, IL – Community Branding Introduction.
He gave a history of and information on North Star noting they have worked with 250 cities,
counties, and municipalities aross the country helping them reach their preferred futures.
Mr. Munoz stated your brand is what they say about you when you’re not around stating it is deeper
than a logo talking about branding vs. marketing and noting branding is about putting Woodstock’s
best foot forward. Discussing what can be gained from branding, he communities generally become
more competitive and see improvement in their overall reputation when all the main sectors of a
community are aligned to a common strategy, referred to as its DNA. He gave examples of the
impact effective branding has had on other cities
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 2 of 11
Mr. Munoz then described the process and steps of brand development noting it will be a plan that
fits the City’s needs and budget. He talked about what they will be doing to help Woodstock develop
a brand and what have been done thus far in the process, including meeting with community focus
groups, City Staff, and individual Councilmembers.
Mayor Turner thanked Mr. Munoz for the insightful presentation opining it matches the direction of
Council and City Staff to develop a unified message with expectations and pride in the community
to attract those who want to invest in in Woodstock.
In response to questions from the Council, Mr. Munoz stated community engagement is a significant
part of the process noting they will be meeting with stakeholders both in person and in focus groups
and also will be using a community-wide survey.
B. Public Comments
Alex Wimmer, 1421 Westwood Trail, addressed the Council on the need for a City flag, opining the
current “city flag” is merely the City Seal on a piece of fabric. Noting his interest in city flags, he
described the tenants of their design, providing a handout to Council with associated information.
He then showed an example of a proposed Woodstock flag which he designed describing the
meaning of each element. He encouraged Council to discuss creation and adoption of a Woodstock
city.
A brief discussion followed of how this goes along with the branding project. Expressing the idea
as intriquing, Mayor Turner asked Staff and Council to contemplate this idea along with the branding
project. Councilmembers expressed their appreciation to Mr. Wimmer for his work on this item.
RB Thompson, 626 E. Calhoun, approached Council to advocate for expanding the use of the rock
face that surrounds the Square to other areas of Woodstock, noting it would be a type of branding.
He suggested placing the rock face element on the bandstand, around the fountain in
Sesquicentennial park, and in the roundabouts being placed around town.
Mr. Thompson also advocated for making the light posts in the Square uniform with speakers facing
inward so people can hear. He opined the speakers could have a switch so they can be used when
necessary in different parts of the Square, noting the difficulty in hearing the Lighting of the Square
ceremony.
Mayor Turner thanked him for his suggestions and noted Staff has been working on the Square sound
system. Ms. Betz stated upgrades to the Square electrical system are currently being worked on and
responses to an RFP that addresses the Square sound system are due on Friday
C. Council Comments
Noting he came though the Square area on Sunday, Councilman Seegers opined the Square looked
wonderful with all the people celebrating Mexican Independence Day. He stated people were happy
and engaged in the community which made him proud to be in Woodstock.
Councilman Flynn commended the hard work of Hispanic Connections, a group which wanted to
engage the community. He opined it was an amazing event with attendees from all over the area
and even other states.
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 3 of 11
Mayor Turner opined the event is a defining element of what Woodstock is as a community,
expressing his pride. He commended the Chamber, Hispanic Connections, and the support given by
City Staff and Real Woodstock, and also the attendees from all over.
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by G. Tebo, second by L. Lohmeyer, to approve the Consent Agenda.
In response to a question from Mayor Turner, the following items were removed from the Consent
Agenda at the request of Council or the Public:
• Item D-1 – Ordinance – City Code Text Amendments by Councilwoman Piersall
• Item D-2 – Ordinance – Solar Energy Farm – US Route 14 and Lily Pond Road by Councilman
Nierman
In response to a question from Mayor Turner, the following questions or comments were
forthcoming from the Council or the Public regarding items remaining on the Consent Agenda.
Item D-4 – Resolution – OSLAD Grand for Funding
In response to questions from Councilman Flynn, Ms. Willcockson stated the Intergenerational
Playground Project has been presented before the Parks and Recreation Commission noting there
were no negative comments. She stated the site change came about very recently in preparation of
the OSLAD grant application noting it was not possible to present the change to the Commission as
its meeting was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. She stated the grant application can be submitted
listing the site as the Park as a whole. Noting the availability of water and parking infrastructure at
the new location, Ms. Willcockson stated Staff is trying to maximize the budgeted funds by using
that site.
Councilman Flynn expressed concern with the new location stating it is near the road that is a cut
through in the Park opining the original site would have been safer. In response, Ms. Betz stated the
original site would be well over the 40% of the OSLAD grant noting the additional funding would
have to come outside the grant and opining site development would probably cost $1.5 million. She
stated Staff has ideas to increase safety around the new site which they feel would be at a lower cost
and noted reasons the new site would appropriate for new bathrooms.
In response to a question from Mayor Turner, Ms. Betz stated the new location will come before the
Parks and Recreation Commission.
Councilman Flynn opined this is an example of why a Parks Master Plan must be a priority for the
City.
Noting the priority of grant funding, Mayor Turner stated the direction is to do what is needed to
meet the deadline, being flexible without jeopardizing the grant. He opined sites should be vetted
further, including taking other strategic factors into consideration such as Thunder Football.
Item D-5 – Contract Award – Lift Station Telemetry
In response to a question from Councilman Nierman, Mr. Aymond stated the bid was not awarded
to the low bidder because it did not have all resources needed by the City such as the ability to
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 4 of 11
measure the flow in the lift station. He stated in his professional opinion the recommended award
is warranted.
There were no Public comments or questions on any items remaining on the Consent Agenda.
Mayor Turner affirmed the Consent Agenda to include items A through C and D-3 through D-9, as
follows:
A. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
September 6, 2022 City Council Minutes
B. WARRANTS: 4020 4021
C. MINUTES AND REPORTS
Historic Preservation Commission Special Meeting Minutes May 2022
Opera House Advisory Commission Minutes May 2022
Environmental Commission Minutes June 2022
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes June 2022
Plan Commission Minutes June 2022
Economic Development Commission Minutes July 2022
Human Resources Department Monthly Report June 2022
Human Resources Department Monthly Report July 2022
Human Resources Department Monthly Report August 2022
D. MANAGER'S REPORT NO. 211:
3. Ordinance – FY21/22 Budget Amendments
Approval of Ordinance 22-O-48, identified as Document 4, An Ordinance Amending
the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Budget of the City of Woodstock
4. Resolution – OSLAD Grant for Funding
Approval of Resolution 22-R-24, identified as Document 4, A Resolution Confirming
Financial Support for IDNR’s OSLAD Grant Program to Fund Woodstock’s Proposed
Intergenerational Inclusive Playground Project.
5. Contract Award – Lift Station Telemetry
Award of contract to Berg-Johnson Associates, Inc., Chicago, IL for Installation of
Mission Communications wireless alarm, monitoring and remote-control systems at
the two (2) wastewater treatment plants and twenty-two (22) lift stations, including an
annual service communication package of $13,702 and a total cost in the current fiscal
year not-to-exceed $120,067.
6. Contract Award – Emricson Park – Burying of Overhead Electrical Lines
Award of Contract to Associated Electrical Contractors, Woodstock, IL for burying
electrical lines at Emricson Park for a cost not-to-exceed $31,615.
7. Contract Award – Lightning Detection Systems for City Parks and Facilities
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 5 of 11
Award of Contract to Perry Weather, Dallas, TX for lightning detection system
installation and software services for a total price of $54,783.
8. Agreement – IGA – IT Services
Approval of an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for Information Technology (IT)
Services with the Woodstock Fire/Rescue District and authorization for the City
Manager to execute said agreement subject to final review by the City Attorney.
9. Agreement – Architectural Service Agreement for Old Courthouse with Studio
GWA
Approval of an agreement with Studio GWA for architectural services related to the
Old Courthouse for an amount of $105,000 and authorization for the City Manager to
execute said agreement subject to final review by the City Attorney.
A roll call vote was taken Ayes: D. Flynn, L. Lohmeyer T. Nierman, W. Piersall, B. Seegers, G.
Tebo and Mayor M. Turner.. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: Motion carried.
Item - D-1 - Ordinance – City Code Text Amendments
Mayor Turner yielded the floor to Councilwoman Piersall.
Motion by W. Piersall, second by B. Seegers, to divide the question to consider text amendments
to the Unified Development Ordinance as follows:
• Item D-1A - Table 7.A.4, Allowed and Special Use, to consider cannabis business
dispensaries as permitted rather than special uses;
• Item D-1B - Chapter 13, Sign Controls, 13.6, to consider changes to certain temporary
sign requirements to clean-up and clarify inconsistent language and to expand the
opportunities for businesses to have signage for special sales and promotions;
• Item D-1C - Chapter 13, Sign Controls, 13.8.13.G, to reduce the frequency of message
changes for electronic message signs from 10 seconds to 6 seconds.
Ayes: D. Flynn, L. Lohmeyer, T. Nierman, W. Piersall, B. Seegers, G. Tebo, and Mayor M.
Turner. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none. Motion carried.
Item D-1A – Approval of an Ordinance amending Table 7.A.4 Allowed and Special Use Table
of the Unified Development Ordinance to Consider Cannabis Business Dispensaries as
Permitted Rather than Special Uses
Expressing opposition to this proposed amendment, Councilwoman Piersall expressed her concern
about the possible locations at which cannabis dispensaries would be allowed without deliberation
by the City Council should the requirement for a Special Use Permit be removed for this use,
providing a map depicting where dispensaries could be allowed. She opined the Council should
have the opportunity to consider whether a dispensary should be placed near the Square, for
example. She noted the City currently does not place a limit on the number of dispensaries
allowed. She asked that cannabis dispensaries remain a special use required to come before
Council for consideration.
Mayor Turner stated the intent of this amendment was to cut red tape and attract businesses to
Woodstock. He further noted a Special Use Permit is a very important right of the Council, stating
he understands Councilwoman Piersall’s concerns.
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 6 of 11
In response to Mayor Turner’s question, Mr. Stelford stated all municipalities were using special
use permits when cannabis businesses first came about but now many are moving away from
defining this as a special use. Noting these businesses are legal and highly regulated by the state
of Illinois and are a huge revenue source, he expressed the City’s wish to be business friendly. Mr.
Stelford opined the problems associated with cannabis use will still occur in the community, as it
is legal, without the revenue that could be used for them. He noted these licenses are presently
difficult to get so the limit is not now a concern but could be in the future.
In response to questions from Councilman Seegers, Mr. Napolitano stated the Special Use process
would take 60 days and costs for attorney and application fees. City Schlossberg opined costs
could reach $5,000 to $10,000 or more. Mr. Christensen stated the City receives a 3% tax, noting
the State cannot disclose sales figures to the City at this time. He confirmed the City could choose
to provide a monetary incentive to the businesses should the Special Use requirement remain.
Mayor Turner stated while he appreciates the business-friendly aspect, he does not believe the
Special Use requirement is too high a hurdle opining it is an important tool for the City. Noting
the potential for the unknown, he stated this provides the opportunity to maintain more oversight.
He expressed support for keeping the Special Use requirement at this time, which Councilman
Tebo also supported.
Noting Councilman Flynn’s expressed wish to keep a level playing field for businesses, some of
which do have the Special Use requirement, City Attorney Schlossberg opined the City would
have no liability should it keep the Special Use requirement being considered this evening.
Motion by W. Piersall, second by B. Seegers, to deny Item D-1A, approval of An Ordinance
Amending Table 7.A.4 Allowed and Special Use Table of the Unified Development Ordinance to
consider cannabis business dispensaries as permitted rather than special uses;
There were no questions forthcoming from the Council or the Public regarding the motion.
A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Flynn, L. Lohmeyer, T. Nierman, W. Piersall, B Seegers, G.
Tebo, and Mayor M. Turner. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none. Motion carried.
Item D-1B – Approval of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 13, Sign Controls, 13.6, of the
Unified Development Ordinance to Make Changes to Certain Temporary Sign
Requirements Regarding Special Sales and Promotion
Councilwoman Piersall recused herself and exited the Council Chambers at 8:18PM.
Motion by D. Flynn, second by L. Lohmeyer, to approve Ordinance 22-O-49, An Ordinance
Amending Chapter 13, Sign Controls, 13.6 of the Unified Development Ordinance to make
changes to certain temporary sign requirements regarding special sales and promotions.
In response to requests from Councilmembers, Mr. Napolitano provided a summary of the
proposed ordinance and an overview of the problems which are hoped to be addressed by this
amendment. He stated the changes would benefit both the business community and City Staff,
There were no further questions or comments from the Council or the Public.
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 7 of 11
A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Flynn, L. Lohmeyer, T. Nierman, B. Seegers, G. Tebo, and
Mayor M. Turner. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: W. Piersall. Motion carried.
Councilwoman Piersall returned to the Council Chambers and rejoined the proceedings at 8:22PM.
Item D-1C - Chapter 13, Sign Controls, 13.8.13.G, To Reduce the Frequency of Message
Changes for Electronic Message Signs From 10 Seconds to 6 Seconds
In response to a question from Councilman Seegers, Mr. Napolitano provided background
information on this item, noting the change is requested by both the business community and the
City.
Motion by G. Tebo, second by W. Piersall to approve Ordinance 22-O-50, An Ordinance
Amending Chapter 13, Sign Controls, 13.8.13G to reduce the frequency of message changes for
electronic message signs from 10 seconds to 6 seconds.
A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Flynn, L. Lohmeyer, T. Nierman, W. Piersall, B. Seegers, G.
Tebo, and Mayor M. Turner. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none. Motion carried.
Item D-2 – Solar Farm – US Route 14 and Lily Pond Road
Stating he has no objection to solar power, Councilman Nierman stated for him the question is the
location as this is a gateway into the community and opining the site could be used for something
better than a solar field. He wondered why it has taken so long for this project to obtain funding
if this is an ideal site.
Mayor Turner stated the question is whether to continue with a one-year extension as it discourages
other possible uses from coming forward opining the petitioner should give Council reasons to
believe this project will move forward.
Mr. Stelford provided a history of this project noting it was started in 2018 and has previously
been before the Council for extension.
Councilman Seegers expressed agreement that this is not a good location for this project. He stated
he is not opposed to Woodstock having solar farms, but not at this location.
Noting the delay is because of the State not the petitioner, Councilwoman Piersall expressed
disagreement that approving an extension for this project would send a bad impression of
Woodstock. Stating she is poud of Woodstock’s wonderful environmental history, she cited the
work of the Environmental Defenders and the fact that Woodstock was the first to offer curbside
recycling in Illinois. She opined approving this request would send the message that this is what
Woodstock is about.
Opining Woodstock is progressive and on the cutting edge of the environment, Councilman Tebo
stated he is not concerned about a solar farm being on this site coming into town and expressed
support for granting the extension.
Petition Tom Ryan of New Leaf, formerly Borrego, provided additional information on the project
stating it has been held up due to things beyond their control, explaining this further He opined
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 8 of 11
this is a very good location for the project stating they are prepared to go forward on November
with the only thing needed being the Special Use Permit.
In response to a question from Mayor Turner regarding the timeline, Mr. Ryan stated all tests have
been completed and construction will take four to six months. He stated a local contractor needs
to be found.
The Director of Development for the petitioner provided additional information on the process
including the merit-based scoring system now being used. He stated this project will be scored on
November 1 opining it has an 80% chance of success which would allow them to move into
construction the following construction season in May of 2023.
Stating this is a good site for the project, he stated while rural projects may be desirable from a
visual perspective, it is also desirable for the fields to be near the load they are serving. He stated,
in addition, there is only one nearby neighbor who has no objection to the project; and the
landowner is an advocate for and committed to solar.
Mayor Turner opined solar would be a good image and set Woodstock apart as a city. He
expressed concern that they can look awful when they get old, however, asking about the
petitioner’s commitment to keep the facility looking good.
The petitioner described the look of the project, including vegetation. He stated they must make
a commitment to the state regarding protocols and on-going maintenance.
In response to questions from Councilman Nierman, the petitioner confirmed they also have the
Alden Road solar farm but do not have the same requirements for it from the state, including
regarding pollinators.
Mayor Turner noted the SUP would give the City management if the petitioner does not keep its
word. Noting the proposed site is a gateway, he stated if the solar farm starts to look bad, he would
advocate for pulling the permit. They petitioner noted they have a detailed landscape management
plan.
In response to questions from the Council, the petitioner stated the panels have a life expectancy
of 25 to 40 years after which they are removed noting there is a bond supplied to the City which
will cover the term of the farm. He stated they are the developer and will sell the contract to
someone else after development is complete.
Councilman Seegers opined the bond is not enough to remove the panels from the ground. In
response to his question, the petitioner stated the system owner will be responsible for bond
performance. In response to Councilman Seegers’ expressed objection to this, City Attorney
Schlossberg opined it would be difficult to remedy. Councilman Seegers opined the City cannot
afford a mistake at the entry to the community. He noted the City would not be giving the SUP to
the final owner of the field which is a concern. He also expressed concern about the amount of a
bond set now for work to be done 25 years in the future. Councilman Nierman agreed, opining
they Alden Road field is not being taken care of.
In response to a question from Mayor Turner regarding whether other requests for approval will
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 9 of 11
come before the Council in the future, Mr. Stelford stated this could happen when the time comes
to take the field down, for example. ROSCOE – is this how you want this recorded?
In response to a question from Mayor Turner regarding the ability of Council to put conditions on
approval of the extension of the SUP, Ms. Schlossberg stated conditions could be placed but the
matter would have to come back before the Plan Commission for a public hearing to amend the
SUP and then back to the Council for approval.
Jordan Newell, attorney for the petitioner, noted the amount of the bond for decommissioning
remains an issue industry-wide. He stated the bond amount can be re-evaluated every five years
noting the diligence done by the City in 2018 was intended to put this protection in place. Mayor
Turner expressed concern as to whether the current ordinance is sufficient for the future.
The petitioner opined this project is important noting it is one of the highest-value projects based
on merit. Noting November 1 is a crucial date, he stated it is critical to extend the SUP if the
project is to move forward. Mayor Turner suggested they return to the next meeting in two weeks
with a decommissioning plan to answer Council’s concerns.
In response to Councilman Seegers’ questions, the petitioner provided information on Borrego,
stating it is the largest developer of solar projects in the country, noting they have a maintenance
team, a development team, and a construction team with enormous experience. He stated not only
do they build solar projects, but they also work with companies that specialize in ownership. He
stated he cannot tell the City who the owner will be in 25 years which is true of all businesses. He
stated the transfer of ownership is at construction start so they will not be able to provide this
ownership information on October 4.
Mayor Turner requested that more information be supplied to Council regarding any connections
that can be made to hold potential owners to any agreements and transfer certain requirements to
them. The petitioner stated that is always the intent of their agreements. Mayor Turner asked Ms.
Schlossberg and Staff to have involvement in this.
In response to Councilman Seegers’ statement that he would like both New Leaf and subsequent
owners to be on the bond, Ms. Schlossberg opined they cannot bond today for 25 years from now.
The petitioner noted they place bonds for decommissioning at the building permit.
Mayor Turner suggested postponing this item to the next meeting to give the petitioner the
opportunity to provide more information for Council to review regarding the concerns expressed
this evening, including regarding bonding and decommissioning.
Discussion turned to landscaping requirements. The petitioner noted they have an updated design
to reflect the new requirements which they would be happy to share with Council at the next
meeting.. In response to Councilman Flynn’s question, Ms. Schlossberg stated the original
ordinance cannot be amended to show the updated landscaping requirements without another
Public Hearing.
In response to Councilman Seegers’ questions, the discussion turned to benefits to the community
from this project. The petitioner stated the benefit to the City would be increased tax revenue from
property taxes and the benefit to residents would be the opportunity to get discounted electricity.
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 10 of 11
He stated the area would also see economic benefits from the construction and maintenance
contracts awarded.
There was no comment forthcoming from the Public.
Motion by W. Piersall, second by D. Flynn, to postpone to time specific, October 4, 2022, Item D-
2 – Ordinance – Solar Energy Farm – US Route 14 and Lily Pond Road.
There were no comments forthcoming from the Council or the Public regarding the motion.
A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Flynn, L. Lohmeyer, T. Nierman, W Piersall, B. Seegers, G.
Tebo, and Mayor M. Turner. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none.
VI. DISCUSSION – Melissa O’Leary Memorial Fund and Fundraising/Splash Pad
Mayor Turner stated this is discussion of a memorial fund to place a Splash Pad at the Aquatic
Center in honor of Melissa O’Leary. He stated he is heartened by the concept of honoring her and
creating an improvement to something that was such an important part of her life.
Mr. Stelford talked about Ms. O’Leary noting she was an important part of the Recreation
Department and Pool Staff.
Mr. Zinnen provided information on the proposed project which would place a Splash Pad in the
sand pit area of Woodstock Waterworks.
Ms. Gulli stated many people have been asking about ways they could contribute to something for
Ms. O’Leary. She noted the Recreation Department is talking about changing the Challenge Road
Run to the Melissa O’Leary Run.
In response to Councilman Tebo’s questions, Mr. Zinnen stated the Department is in the project
of obtaining information from contractors regarding costs. He noted water/sewer and electric
service is already at the location. Ms. Betz stated Public Works will work with Mr. Zinnen.
Councilman Flynn stated this would be an amazing gesture for someone who made a huge impact
on the community.
Mayor Turner expressed enthusiastic support for the idea with the consensus of the City Council
to proceed with project development.
VI. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mayor Turner noted the addition of the Solar Field SUP to the October 4 Agenda. There were no
further additions, deletions, or corrections to the tentative future Council agendas.
Mayor Turner noted the possible addition of Special Meetings to discuss proposed development
of the former Die Cast site.
ADJOURN
Woodstock City Council
09/20/22
Page 11 of 11
Motion by D. Flynn, second by T. Nierman, to adjourn this regular meeting of the Woodstock City
Council to its next regular meeting on Tuesday, October 4, at 7:00PM in the Council Chambers at
Woodstock City Hall. Ayes: D. Flynn, L. Lohmeyer, T. Nierman, W. Piersall, B. Seegers, G.
Tebo, and Mayor M. Turner. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none. Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:34PM
Respectfully submitted,
Cindy Smiley
City Clerk
Get email alerts for Woodstock
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.