Fire & Police Committee

Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Wyomissing Borough Months in Dispatched 01/2026 Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) T Month Totals 239 Yearly Running Total 239 02/2026 03/2026 04/2026 05/2026 06/2026 07/2026 Grand Total AF BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) 196 265 240 244 243 104 1,531 435 700 940 1,184 1,427 1,531 1,531 R D 1/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Previous Month Dispostion of Calls Disposition Assist, Agency T Total s 2 Assist, Public Cancelled (No Patient Contact) Cancelled (Prior to Arrival at Scene) AF Patient Evaluated, No Treatment/Transport Required Patient Refused Evaluation/Care (Without Transport) Patient Treated, Released (AMA) Patient Treated, Released (per protocol) Patient Treated, Transferred Care to Another EMS Professional/Unit 9 18 24 4 10 2 1 1 Transported Lights/Siren R Transported Lights/Siren, Downgraded Transported No Lights/Siren N\A 116 3 52 0 Totals D 2/10 242 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Calls Taken by Shift Breakdown Shift Dayshift 06-18 Night Shift 18-06 Shift Report 171 72 T Shift Report 243 AF R D 3/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Units That Responded to Calls Unit M6521 M6511 Total Unit Calls 128 32 T I6561 S650 I6515 M6512 A6515 I6512 I6522 M6531 17 16 15 15 14 2 2 1 AF A6512 R 1 D 4/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) M 65 # = a MICU unit with a Paramedic I65 # = a Intermediate Unit with an Advanced EMT B65 # - a Basic Life Support Unit with 2 EMT's S650 is the Supervisor ALS Response Vehicle T Chute Time AF Response Time R D 5/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) On Scene Time T AF R D 6/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Total Monthly Service Area Call Volume T BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) AF Others 220 BERKS - BERN TOWNSHIP (06920) 77 BERKS - LOWER HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP (06940) 45 BERKS - SINKING SPRING BOROUGH (06959) 54 BERKS - SOUTH HEIDELBERG 243 R BERKS - WEST READING (06812) 151 TOWNSHIP (06960) 71 BERKS - SPRING TOWNSHIP (06961) 335 D BERKS - WERNERSVILLE BOROUGH (06972) 75 7/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Level of Service of all calls Yearly Breakdown by Hospital Destination T Penn State - St. Joseph Medical Center Tower Health - Reading Hospital 150 Basic Life Support 75 BLS, Upgraded Others 0 39% 48% AF ALS, Downgraded 18 Advanced Life Support 92 88% 12% 7 R 1.13K D 8/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Nursing Home Total Calls Others 4 T COUNTRY MEADOWS BLDG 1 - 1800 11 AF 57% 7% 18% 18% COUNTRY MEADOWS BLDG 2 - 1802 11 R Highlands Of Wyomissing 34 D 9/10 Wyomissing Borough (av) Jul 12, 2026 8:44:09 AM EMS Filter statement Filters Days in Dispatched 12/1/25 to 12/31/26 Is Locked true Scene Zone BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813), BERKS - WYOMISSING HILLS BOROUGH (06976) Narcan Administration System wide Treatment Name Narcan Scene Zone BERKS - BERN TOWNSHIP (06920) BERKS - READING CITY (06001) T Narcan Treatment 3 2 AF BERKS - SOUTH HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP (06960) BERKS - SPRING TOWNSHIP (06961) BERKS - TULPEHOCKEN TOWNSHIP (06967) BERKS - WERNERSVILLE BOROUGH (06972) BERKS - WEST READING (06812) BERKS - WYOMISSING BOROUGH (06813) 1 2 3 2 4 7 R D 10/10  West Side Regional Emergency Management Agency Serving the Boroughs of Sinking Spring, West Reading, Wyomissing and Twp of Spring Thomas Bausher, Emergency Management Coordinator 2301 Monroe Ave, West Lawn, PA 19609 Phone 610.898.8060 Cell 484.256.3319 Email: tbausher@springtwpberks.org Fire and Police Meeting Info July 27, 2026 • T The July 4th Parade included a more comprehensive EOC operation here at the Boro Hall Council Chamber to monitor and keep things safe. Chief Phillips of the Police Department developed and reviewed the in-depth operations plan for this event. Lt Bauer was the • AF commander in the EOC on the day of the parade. EOC functions and checklists were provided for and handled by emergency staff personnel present. There were no serious events during the parade. The personnel assigned to the EOC and in the field worked well together. An after-action meeting was held to review things that went well and discuss how some things could be altered for improvement. Overall, job well done by staff present. As previously reported, the emergency callback system Code Red Crisis 24 is in service. DR We are currently finishing negotiations and adjusting the updated agreement for 2026-27 and 2027-28. Signing or resigning for connection to the system is still encouraged and is advertised for citizens in the Wyomissing and West Side Regional area with instructions on how to accomplish the sign up. Two locations with sign-up instructions include the Borough website and the July issue of the locally published Stroll Magazine article with Code Red sign-up procedures. Submitted by: Thomas Bausher, EMC  BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING POLICE DEPARTMENT 2026 Mid-Year Law Enforcement Performance and Statistical Summary: Number of Incidents Handled: 4,455 Average Time Needed To Arrive On Location: 4.96 minutes. Average Time Spent On An Incident: 20.77 minutes. T The Below Chart Shows The Top 10 Incident Types Handled and Number of Incidents Per- Day of the Week: AF DR  BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING POLICE DEPARTMENT The Below Chart Shows The Top 10 Census Tracts for the first 6 months: T AF D Total Money Brought In (Fines, OT Reimbursement, Report Request etc.): $44,777.20 Total Expenses Through June: $1,599,487.31 R Total Budgeted Expenses: $1,779,500.00 Arrests: 149 Adult Arrests: 142 Adult Male: 104 Juvenile Male: 6 Juvenile Arrests: 7 Adult Female: 38 Juvenile Female: 1 Adult Non-Hispanic: 87 Juvenile Non-Hispanic: 2 Adult Hispanic: 55 Juvenile Hispanic: 5 Race/Black/Adult: 32 Race/Black/Juvenile: 2 Race/White/Adult: 107 Race/White/Juvenile: 5 Race/Asian/Adult: 3  BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING POLICE DEPARTMENT The chart below shows the top 10 types of incidents an arrest was made and the number of arrests made by day of the week: T AF DR UCR OFFENSES: Total: 168 Total Cleared: 143 Clearance Percentage: 85.1% Total Part I: 78 Total Part I Cleared: 55 Total Part II: 90 Total Part II Cleared: 88  BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING POLICE DEPARTMENT Vehicle Infraction Information: Total Number of Traffic Stops not resulting in a Misdemeanor or higher arrest: 1,208 Total Number of Citations: 781 Total Number of Warnings: 768 Total Number of Parking Tickets: 22 Operator Statistical Information: Sex - Female: 377 Male: 786 Ethnicity - Non-Hispanic: 554 T Unknown: 45 Hispanic: 554 Unknown: 100 Race – Asian: 7, American Indian: 1, White: 840, Black: 248, Unknown: 112 AF D John G. Phillips R John G. Phillips Chief of Police  BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA RESOLUTION NO. 2026-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA APPROVING THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN RECORDS WHEREAS, pursuant to Act 428 of 1968 the Local Government Records Committee issued the Municipal Records Manual establishing the schedule and procedures for the retention and disposition of municipal records; and WHEREAS, by virtue of the, Resolution Number 2019-12, adopted on August 13, 2019, T Council for the Borough of Wyomissing declared and reaffirmed its intent to follow the schedules and procedures for the retention and disposition of records as set forth in the Municipal Records Manual approved on December 16, 2008 as amended and most recently revised and approved by said committee on March 28, 2019; and AF WHEREAS, in accordance with Act 428 of 1968, each individual act of disposition shall be approved by resolution of the governing body of the municipality; and WHEREAS, certain Borough of Wyomissing documents are appropriate for disposition in accordance with the schedule established by the Municipal Records Manual. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by Council for the Borough of Wyomissing, Berks County, Pennsylvania in accordance with the above cited Municipal Records Manual and declaration of its intent to abide by the schedule set forth in the Municipal Records Manual, Council hereby authorizes the disposition of the following public records: DR POLICE RECORDS 0001-2005 through 3649-2006 except the following: 0525-05, 1250-05, 1278-05, 1282-05, 1571-05, 2278-05, 2661-05, 2684-05, 2690-05, 3463-05, 5417-05, 5858-05, 6286-05, 0273-06, 0380-06, 0383-06, 0392-06, 0807-06, 1016-06, 1150-06, 1224-06, 1620-06, 1788-06, 1927-06, 2101-06, 2127-06, 2271-06, 2797-06, and 2854-06 FURTHER RESOLVED, that if any provision, sentence, clause, section, or part of this Resolution shall for any reason be found to be unconstitutional, illegal or invalid, such determination shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, sentences, clauses, sections, or parts of this Resolution, and it is hereby declared to be the intent of the Council of the Borough of Wyomissing that this Resolution would have been adopted had such unconstitutional, illegal or invalid provision, sentence, clause, section or part not been included herein.  FURTHER RESOLVED, that all Resolutions or parts of Resolutions inconsistent with this Resolution are hereby superseded. FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall become effective immediately. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Council of the Borough of Wyomissing has adopted this Resolution in lawful session this ______day of _____________________, 2026. BOROUGH COUNCIL BOROUGH OF WYOMISSING, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA By: ______________________________________ Attest: _________________________ Melissa Miller T Kristen M. Gajewski President of Borough Council AF Borough Secretary _______________________________ Fred Levering, Mayor DR  CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of a Resolution of the Council of the Borough of Wyomissing, Berks County, Pennsylvania, which was fully adopted at a public meeting held pursuant to notice as required by law on the ___ day of ____________ 2026. ____________________________________ Melissa Miller, Borough Secretary Dated: _________________, 2026 T AF DR  LTAP Technical Assistance Report TA Number: 24178 To: T Michele Bare, Wyomissing Borough, Berks County Borough Manager Phone: 610-376-7481 AF Email: mbare@wyomissingboro.org John Phillips, Wyomissing Borough, Berks County Police Chief Phone: 610-375-6102, ext. 142 Email: JPhillips@wyopd.org D From: R Date: Subject: Marvin Ta, P.E., PTOE, ENV SP, LTAP Technical Expert Phone: 717-620-5936 Email: MTa@Pennoni.com December 22, 2025 Lawndale Road Intersections and Mayfair Road/Wingert Road, Wyomissing Borough, Berks County Page 1 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178 Safety Concern and Background In response to a technical assistance request from Wyomissing Borough, LTAP met with John Phillips, Police Chief, on September 23, 2025, to examine intersections along Lawndale Road as well as the intersection of Mayfair Road and Wingert Road. The Borough wants to ensure that the appropriate intersection traffic controls are being used. Figure 1 shows an aerial view of the study intersections with the existing intersection traffic control. The study intersections were assessed through walking, driving, and reviewing site conditions. T AF DR Field Observations Figure 1: Aerial View of the Study Intersections Lawndale Road is a two-lane, two-way Borough road with no longitudinal pavement markings, and sidewalks exist on both sides of the road. Other pavement markings on Lawndale Road include Type A – Parallel crosswalk markings at all intersections except Edgedale Road and Vista Road as well as a westbound SLOW pavement marking between Wingert Road and Vista Road. The roadway width is approximately 24 feet from curb to curb. The roadway length per PennDOT’s Type 5B Map is 0.28 mile (1,478 feet). Per traffic data collected by the Borough, Lawndale Road has an average daily traffic (ADT) of 2,186 vehicles per day (vpd) in both directions. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH, and traffic data collected by the Borough shows an average 85th percentile speed of 25 MPH in both directions. Page 2 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178 Lawndale Road is uncontrolled through the intersections except at Woodland Road and Daleview Road. Traffic observed during the field visit included pedestrians on the sidewalks and a school bus as seen in Figure 2, and land use is primarily residential with Wyomissing Hills Elementary Center near the intersection with Woodland Road. Although bicyclists were not observed, sharrows were present as seen in Figure 3. On-street parking was observed, but parking restrictions exist on the south side of the road and on both sides between Woodland Road and Edgedale Road. T AF Figure 2: Westbound School Bus DR Figure 3: Westbound Sharrows Page 3 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178 Crash Data LTAP obtained crash data for a five-year period from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2024, from PennDOT’s online Pennsylvania Crash Information Tool (PCIT). According to PCIT, there were three (3) crashes along Lawndale Road: head-on (property damage only) at the intersection with Woodland Road, rear-end (injury) near the intersection with Edgedale Road, and hit fixed object (injury) at the intersection with Vista Road. There were no crashes at the Wingert Road and Mayfair Road intersection. In addition to the reportable crashes from PCIT, the Borough Police Department provided nonreportable crash data, which showed four (4) additional crashes: Edgedale Road, two (2) at Daleview Road, and Vista Road. One (1) crash was a rear-end (Daleview Road), and the rest of them involved hitting a parked vehicle. References T Field observations, discussions with municipal personnel, application of state/federal traffic control device guidelines, highway safety research, and traffic engineering experience are largely responsible for the content and findings of this memo. In addition, specific references that were consulted include: • • • • • • AF FHWA, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) FHWA, Intersection Safety: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/ PennDOT Publications 46, 111, 212, and 236 PA Vehicle Code, Title 75 PA Code, Title 67 AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets Assessment D Intersection Traffic Control An engineering and traffic study is required per Pennsylvania’s Vehicle Code, Title 75, Section 6109 to establish traffic restrictions including stop-controlled intersections. Per Section 6109(e), the study R must follow PennDOT’s regulations, which are contained in the Pennsylvania Code, Title 67, Chapter 212. Title 67, Chapter 212 is also known as PennDOT’s Official Traffic Control Devices, Publication 212 (Pub. 212). In addition to PennDOT’s regulations, the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) has criteria on selecting the appropriate intersection traffic control. From the MUTCD, Section 2B.06, when selecting a form of intersection control, the following factors should be considered: A. Motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; where the term units/day or units/hour is indicated, it should be the total of motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume; B. Driver yielding behavior with regard to all modes of conflicting traffic, including bicyclists and pedestrians; C. Number and angle of approaches; D. Approach speeds; Page 4 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  E. Sight distance available on each approach; F. Reported crash experience; and G. The presence of a grade crossing near the intersection. Woodland Road This intersection is currently an all-way stop. Therefore, the all-way stop warrants from the MUTCD, Section 2B.12 were assessed: A. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that for a three-leg intersection, there are four (4) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or five (5) or more reported crashes in a 36-month period that were of a type susceptible to correction by the installation of all-way stop control. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 T supplements this by stating that the five (5) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period may include both reportable crashes and nonreportable crashes that are documented in the police files that occurred during a 12-month period during the most recent three (3) years of available crash data. Not met. Per crash data from PCIT and the Borough Police Department, there was AF one (1) head-on crash at this intersection. B. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that sight distance on the minor road approaches controlled by a Stop Sign (R1-1) is not adequate for a vehicle to turn onto or cross the major (uncontrolled) road. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 supplements this by stating that multi-way stop applications may not be used because of limited available corner sight distance unless there is no practical method of improving the sight distance or reducing the speed limit to satisfy the minimum corner sight distance values. Likely not met. Although sight distance was not measured for this intersection since it is currently an all-way stop, any sight distance obstructions, such as vegetation and DR cars, would be correctable. C. All-way stop control may be installed at locations where all-way stop control is an interim measure that can be installed to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of a traffic control signal (see Chapter 4C) at the intersection or for the installation of yield control at a circular intersection. Not met. D. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates: a. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches is at least 300 units per hour for each of any eight (8) hours of a typical day; and b. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches is at least 200 units per hour for each of any of the same eight (8) hours. c. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 MPH, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the values given in Items A and B in Paragraph 1 of this Section. Page 5 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  Not met. The ADT for Lawndale Road is 2,186 vpd, and the ADT for Woodland Road per PennDOT’s Traffic Information Repository (TIRe) is 2,082 vpd. Peak hours for Lawndale Road fall below 300 vph. E. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that all-way stop control is needed due to other factors not addressed in the other all-way stop control warrants. Such other factors may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The need to control left turn conflicts, b. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection, or c. Where pedestrian and/or bicyclist movements support the installation of all-way stop control. T Met. Both Lawndale Road and Woodland Road are residential through streets that are similar in design and operating characteristics. This intersection is also part of the school walking route for the elementary school on Woodland Road. From the warrant assessment, the all-way stop is justified for this intersection. Edgedale Road AF Edgedale Road is currently stop-controlled at the intersection in the southbound direction only. Because this intersection is part of the elementary school walking route, the all-way stop warrants from the MUTCD, Section 2B.12 were assessed: A. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that for a four-leg intersection, there are five (5) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or six (6) or more reported crashes in a 36-month period that were of a type susceptible to correction by the installation of all-way stop control. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 DR supplements this by stating that the five (5) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period may include both reportable crashes and nonreportable crashes that are documented in the police files that occurred during a 12-month period during the most recent three (3) years of available crash data. Not met. Per PCIT and Borough Police, there was one (1) rear-end crash near the intersection. B. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that sight distance on the minor road approaches controlled by a Stop Sign (R1-1) is not adequate for a vehicle to turn onto or cross the major (uncontrolled) road. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 supplements this by stating that multi-way stop applications may not be used because of limited available corner sight distance unless there is no practical method of improving the sight distance or reducing the speed limit to satisfy the minimum corner sight distance values. Not met. Although sight distance looking to the left (westbound approach) is restricted due to a parked vehicle and a tree as seen in Figure 4, the sight distance is correctable by restricting parking and removing the tree. Page 6 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  T Figure 4: Sight Distance Looking to the Left (Westbound Approach) from Edgedale Road AF C. All-way stop control may be installed at locations where all-way stop control is an interim measure that can be installed to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of a traffic control signal (see Chapter 4C) at the intersection or for the installation of yield control at a circular intersection. Not met. D. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates: a. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches is at least 300 units per hour for each of any eight (8) hours of a typical day; and b. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the DR intersection from the minor street approaches is at least 200 units per hour for each of any of the same eight (8) hours. c. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 MPH, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the values given in Items A and B in Paragraph 1 of this Section. Not met. The ADT for Lawndale Road is 2,186 vpd, and the estimated ADT for Edgedale Road per PennDOT’s TIRe is 500 vpd. Peak hours for Lawndale Road fall below 300 vph. E. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that all-way stop control is needed due to other factors not addressed in the other all-way stop control warrants. Such other factors may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The need to control left turn conflicts, b. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection, or Page 7 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  c. Where pedestrian and/or bicyclist movements support the installation of all-way stop control. Met. This intersection is a school walking route with a direct path connecting to the elementary school. From the warrant assessment, the all-way stop is justified for this intersection. Daleview Road Daleview Road is currently uncontrolled at the intersection with Lawndale Road stop-controlled in both directions. Because this intersection is part of the elementary school walking route, the all-way stop warrants from the MUTCD, Section 2B.12 were assessed: A. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates T that for a four-leg intersection, there are five (5) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or six (6) or more reported crashes in a 36-month period that were of a type susceptible to correction by the installation of all-way stop control. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 supplements this by stating that the five (5) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period may include both reportable crashes and nonreportable crashes that are documented in the AF police files that occurred during a 12-month period during the most recent three (3) years of available crash data. Not met. Per PCIT and Borough Police, there were no crashes at this intersection. A. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that sight distance on the minor road approaches controlled by a Stop Sign (R1-1) is not adequate for a vehicle to turn onto or cross the major (uncontrolled) road. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 supplements this by stating that multi-way stop applications may not be used because of limited available corner sight distance unless there is no practical method of improving the sight distance or reducing the speed limit to satisfy the minimum corner sight distance DR values. Not met. Although sight distance was limited traveling southbound on Daleview Road due to parked cars as seen in Figure 5, sight distance is correctable by implementing parking restrictions. Figure 5: Sight Distance Looking to the Right (Eastbound Approach) from Daleview Road Page 8 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  B. All-way stop control may be installed at locations where all-way stop control is an interim measure that can be installed to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of a traffic control signal (see Chapter 4C) at the intersection or for the installation of yield control at a circular intersection. Not met. C. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates: a. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches is at least 300 units per hour for each of any eight (8) hours of a typical day; and b. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches is at least 200 units per hour for each of any of the same eight (8) hours. T c. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 MPH, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the values given in Items A and B in Paragraph 1 of this Section. Not met. The ADT for Lawndale Road is 2,186 vpd, and the estimated ADT for AF Daleview Road per PennDOT’s TIRe is 500 vpd. Peak hours for Lawndale Road fall below 300 vph. D. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that all-way stop control is needed due to other factors not addressed in the other all-way stop control warrants. Such other factors may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The need to control left turn conflicts, b. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection, or c. Where pedestrian and/or bicyclist movements support the installation of all-way DR stop control. Met. This intersection is a school walking route with a direct path connecting to the elementary school. From the warrant assessment, the all-way stop is justified for this intersection. Valley Road Valley Road is currently stop-controlled at the intersection in both directions. All-way stop control would not be appropriate for this intersection, so this assessment will help determine which road should be stop-controlled. From the MUTCD, Section 2B.11, stop control on the minor road approach to an intersection should be considered when engineering judgement indicates that one (1) or more of the following conditions exist: A. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. Not met. Although sight distance looking to the left (westbound approach) is restricted due to a parked vehicle and a tree as seen in Figure 6, the sight distance is correctable by restricting parking and removing the tree. Page 9 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  T AF Figure 6: Sight Distance Looking to the Left (Westbound Approach) from Valley Road B. Crash records indicate that for a four-leg intersection, there are three (3) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or six (6) or more reported crashes in a 36-month period. The crashes should be susceptible to correction by installation of minor road stop control. Not met. Per PCIT and Borough Police, there were no crashes at this intersection. C. The intersection is of a lower functional classification road with a higher functional classification road. Met. Per PennDOT’s TIRe, Valley Road has an estimated ADT of 500 vpd. Lawndale Road has an ADT of 2,186 vpd making it the higher functional classification road. DR D. Conditions that previously supported the installation of all-way stop control no longer exist. N/A. This intersection meets warrants for a two-way stop control on both approaches of Valley Road. Wingert Road Wingert Road is currently stop-controlled at the intersection in both directions. All-way stop control would not be appropriate for this intersection, so this assessment will help determine which road should be stop-controlled. From the MUTCD, Section 2B.11, stop control on the minor road approach to an intersection should be considered when engineering judgement indicates that one (1) or more of the following conditions exist: A. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. Not met. Although sight distance looking to the left (westbound approach) is restricted due to a parked vehicle and a tree as seen in Figure 7, the sight distance is correctable by restricting parking and removing the tree. Page 10 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  T AF Figure 7: Sight Distance Looking to the Left (Westbound Approach) from Wingert Road B. Crash records indicate that for a four-leg intersection, there are three (3) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or six (6) or more reported crashes in a 36-month period. The crashes should be susceptible to correction by installation of minor road stop control. Not met. Per PCIT and Borough Police, there were no crashes at this intersection. C. The intersection is of a lower functional classification road with a higher functional classification road. Met. Per PennDOT’s TIRe, Wingert Road has an estimated ADT of 500 vpd. Lawndale Road has an ADT of 2,186 vpd making it the higher functional classification road. DR D. Conditions that previously supported the installation of all-way stop control no longer exist. N/A. This intersection meets warrants for a two-way stop control on both approaches of Wingert Road. Vista Road Vista Road is currently stop-controlled at the intersection in both directions. All-way stop control would not be appropriate for this intersection, so this assessment will help determine which road should be stop-controlled. From the MUTCD, Section 2B.11, stop control on the minor road approach to an intersection should be considered when engineering judgement indicates that one (1) or more of the following conditions exist: A. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. Not met. Although sight distance looking to the left (westbound approach) is restricted due to a parked vehicle and a tree as seen in Figure 8, the sight distance is correctable by restricting parking and removing the tree. Page 11 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  T AF Figure 8: Sight Distance Looking to the Left (Westbound Approach) from Vista Road B. Crash records indicate that for a four-leg intersection, there are three (3) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or six (6) or more reported crashes in a 36-month period. The crashes should be susceptible to correction by installation of minor road stop control. Not met. Per PCIT and Borough Police, there was a hit fixed object crash. C. The intersection is of a lower functional classification road with a higher functional classification road. Met. Per PennDOT’s TIRe, Vista Road has an estimated ADT of 500 vpd. Lawndale Road has an ADT of 2,186 vpd making it the higher functional classification road. D D. Conditions that previously supported the installation of all-way stop control no longer exist. N/A. This intersection meets warrants for a two-way stop control on both approaches of Vista Road. R Mayfair Road and Wingert Road In addition to the Lawndale Road intersections, the Borough inquired about the existing traffic control for this intersection as well. Wingert Road is currently stop-controlled at the intersection in both directions. All other intersections on Mayfair Road have an all-way stop, so the all-way stop warrants from the MUTCD, Section 2B.12 were assessed: A. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that for a four-leg intersection, there are five (5) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or six (6) or more reported crashes in a 36-month period that were of a type susceptible to correction by the installation of all-way stop control.. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 supplements this by stating that the five (5) or more reported crashes in a 12-month period may include both reportable crashes and nonreportable crashes that are documented in the Page 12 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  police files that occurred during a 12-month period during the most recent three (3) years of available crash data. Not met. Per crash data from PCIT and the Borough Police Department, there were no crashes at this intersection. B. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that sight distance on the minor road approaches controlled by a Stop Sign (R1-1) is not adequate for a vehicle to turn onto or cross the major (uncontrolled) road. PennDOT’s Pub. 212 supplements this by stating that multi-way stop applications may not be used because of limited available corner sight distance unless there is no practical method of improving the sight distance or reducing the speed limit to satisfy the minimum corner sight distance values. Not met. Parked vehicles restricted sight distance at the intersection as seen in T Figure 9, which is correctable by implementing parking restrictions. AF DR Figure 9: Sight Distance Looking to the Right (Southbound Approach) from Mayfair Road C. All-way stop control may be installed at locations where all-way stop control is an interim measure that can be installed to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of a traffic control signal (see Chapter 4C) at the intersection or for the installation of yield control at a circular intersection. Not met. D. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates: a. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches is at least 300 units per hour for each of any eight (8) hours of a typical day; and Page 13 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  b. The combined motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches is at least 200 units per hour for each of any of the same eight (8) hours. c. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 MPH, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the values given in Items A and B in Paragraph 1 of this Section. Not met. The estimated ADT for both roads from PennDOT’s TIRe is 500 vpd. E. All-way stop control may be installed at an intersection where an engineering study indicates that all-way stop control is needed due to other factors not addressed in the other all-way stop control warrants. Such other factors may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The need to control left turn conflicts, b. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar T design and operating characteristics where all-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection, or c. Where pedestrian and/or bicyclist movements support the installation of all-way stop control. AF Not met. Wingert Road is more of a residential collector road when compared to Mayfair Road as it connects to other through streets such as Valley Road, Lawndale Road, and even State Hill Road (SR 3023). Mayfair Road is only 0.1 mile (528 feet) long while Wingert Road is 0.49 mile (2,587 feet) per PennDOT’s Type 5B Map. From the warrant assessment, the all-way stop is not justified for this intersection. Two-way stop control should be implemented in both directions on Mayfair Road rather than Wingert Road. This would apply to the other intersections along Mayfair Road as well (Vista Road and Valley Road) where Mayfair Road should be the only stop-controlled approach. However, if any of these intersections (potentially Valley Road) are part of the school walking route, then an all-way stop can be justified similar to the Edgedale Road and Daleview Road intersections with Lawndale Road to D help mitigate pedestrian (vulnerable road users) and vehicle conflicts. Note that per the MUTCD, Section 2B.06, Stop Signs (R1-1) shall not be used for speed control. If speed is the primary concern, the Borough should verify the concern through data collection and R then conduct a traffic calming study to determine if traffic calming devices such as speed humps are appropriate rather than implementing all-way stops. More specifically along Valley Road by the school and playground, there are various crosswalks (including uncontrolled) on Valley Road that should be reassessed for additional crosswalk countermeasures if there are children crossing. If students are using the Valley Road and Mayfair Road intersection as part of the school walking route, the Borough should also consider high-visibility crosswalks with appropriate curb ramps in addition to the all-way stop. Next Steps Based on a field view of the study intersections, a review of the traffic and crash data, and a review of the applicable standards/guidelines, next steps for the Borough to consider include: Page 14 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  • Implement an all-way stop – Woodland Road, Edgedale Road, and Daleview Road should be an all-way stop based on the warrant assessment. o Per PennDOT’s Handbook of Approved Signs, Publication 236 (Pub. 236), the Stop Signs (R1-1) should all be supplemented with All Way Plaques (R1-3P). o Per PennDOT’s Traffic Control-Pavement Markings and Signing Standards, Publication 111 (Pub. 111), the sign assemblies should be seven (7) feet high from the ground to the bottom of the last sign. o Per PennDOT’s Traffic Engineering Manual, Publication 46 (Pub. 46), the new Stop Signs (R1-1) should be supplemented with a red flasher for a minimum of 30 days. The red flashers should be removed after 30 days. If the Borough thinks the flashers • T are justified on a permanent basis, a permit from PennDOT is required. Temporary Stop Ahead Signs (W3-1) may also be installed on the previously uncontrolled approaches for 30 days. Maintain the two-way stop control – Valley Road, Wingert Road, and Vista Road should remain stop-controlled on both approaches to Lawndale Road. • AF o Ensure all sign assemblies are seven (7) feet high from the ground to the bottom of the last sign. Reverse the two-way stop control – at the Mayfair Road and Wingert Road intersection, the stop control should be reversed with Mayfair Road stop-controlled in both approaches to Wingert Road. PennDOT’s Pub. 46 has a process for reversing the stop control: o Create an all-way stop situation for a period of 30 days. During this 30-day period, Stop Ahead Signs (W3-1) should be erected on the previously uncontrolled approaches (Mayfair Road), and an All Way Plaque (R1-3P) should be added below DR • each Stop Sign (R1-1). A Type B flashing light with a red lens may also be placed above the new Stop Signs (R1-1). o After the 30-day period, on the approaches which originally had the Stop Signs (R1- 1), remove all stop-related signs and any stop lines (Wingert Road). On the other two approaches (Mayfair Road), replace the All Way Plaques (R1-3P) with Cross Traffic Does Not Stop Plaques (W4-4P). o At least 60 days after the removal of the original Stop Signs (R1-1), remove the Cross Traffic Does Not Stop Plaques (W4-4P), the flashing lights, and if not warranted, the Stop Ahead Signs (W3-1). Convert the all-way stop control to stop control on the stem of the T-intersection – at the Vista Road and Valley Road intersections with Mayfair Road, which are currently all-way stop-controlled, convert them to a typical T-intersection stop control on Mayfair Road (assuming these are not part of the school walking route). PennDOT’s Pub. 46 has a process for this conversion: Page 15 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  o Remove any stop-related signs and stop lines on the approaches which originally had the Stop Signs (R1-1). On the Mayfair Road approaches, replace any existing supplemental plaques with the Stop Sign Removed From Side Street Signs (R1-4-1). A Type B flashing light with a red lens may be placed above the remaining Stop Signs (R1-1). o At least 60 days after the removal of the Stop Signs (R1-1), remove the Stop Sign Removed From Side Street Signs (R1-4-1) and the flashing lights. • Improve sight distance – Remove sight distance obstructions by trimming vegetation, removing trees, and restricting parking as necessary to meet minimum sight distance requirements at all intersections. T AF DR Page 16 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178  LTAP shares transportation knowledge, improves road maintenance and safety skills, and puts research and new technology into practice at the local level. For assistance or training opportunities reach out to LTAP through the website, email, or phone. Address : Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Planning and Research Website: Phone: T 400 North Street, 6th Floor, Harrisburg, PA 17120 https://gis.penndot.pa.gov/ltap/ 1-800-FOR-LTAP or 717-787-5243 Fax: Email: AF 717-783-9152 ltap@pa.gov DR Page 17 of 17 PennDOT LTAP: #24178 July 21, 2026 Wyomissing Borough Council 22 Reading Boulevard Wyomissing, PA 19610 RE: T Lawndale Sight Distance Improvement Study Wyomissing Borough McCarthy File: 260004 Dear Council Members, AF On December 22, 2025, PennDOT issued an LTAP Technical Assistance Report based on field observations to improve traffic conditions along Lawndale Road in Wyomissing Borough. Our office has reviewed the recommendation that PennDOT had provided and offered a summary of the proposed improvements on June 12, 2026. A site inspection of each of the intersections present in the LTAP report along Lawndale Road was performed on July 16, 2026. This inspection served to identify opportunities for improvement to sight lines outside of what was offered in the initial PennDOT LTAP Report. Intersections were evaluated at existing and proposed stop sign locations as recommended in the PennDOT LTAP Report for sight triangle obstructions. Per Wyomissing Borough Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, sight triangles at intersections of roads that are posted at 25 miles per hour shall be a minimum of 150 feet where removal of obstructions proves to be prohibitively costly. In the interest D of ecological conservation and to avoid excessive cost, mature trees were not considered viable candidates for removal as a part of this evaluation. R Sight lines of the evaluated filter streets (i.e. side streets) to Lawndale Road were observed to be generally free of obstructing vegetation with the exception of a small number of mature trees that obscure portions of the sight triangle for the southbound lanes of travel at most of the Lawndale intersections that were evaluated. These intersections are identified in the table below. On-street parking was observed to be the main contributor to diminished sight lines at intersections as parked cars block the view of oncoming traffic on both Lawndale Road and its filter streets. The eastbound lane of Lawndale Road has existing ‘NO PARKING’ signs installed mounted to overhead electric power poles along the entire length of the road that prohibit parking on one side of the road. Signs that prohibit parking, per PennDOT design standards, should be placed at minimum 250-foot intervals. No cars were observed to be parked in the eastbound lane of travel along Lawndale Road during the site inspection , however if illegal parking becomes an issue additional signage may be needed.  Lawndale Road – Sight Distance Improvements July 21, 2026 Page 2 It is recommended that at every applicable intersection (as shown in the attached exhibits) a 20 foot long section of yellow curbing as well as ‘NO PARKING’ signs are installed in the westbound travel lane before all intersection with filter streets. This will allow for the full sight distance to be realized for vehicles attempting to turn onto Lawndale Road. For 4-way stop intersections it is recommended that in addition to the 20 foot long section of no parking zone that filter streets have a 15 foot long buffer from the intersection of ‘no parking’ adjacent to the lane with the stop sign. This will ensure proper sight distance requirements are met by vehicles turning onto filter streets from Lawndale Road. T During the site inspection it was also noted that multiple vehicles were driving substantially faster than the posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour as indicated by the installed pole mounted speed monitoring devices. Traffic/Speed control devices per the Pennsylvania Traffic Calming Handbook (Pub. 383) may be warranted to reduce speed related incidents from occurring. A table of improvements for each intersection is included as an attachment to this memo as well as AF exhibits illustrating locations of proposed improvements. If you should have any questions please do not hesitate to reach out to our office. Very truly yours, James C. McCarthy Jim McCarthy, P.E. D JCM/cjw R Borough Engineer CC: Pamela VanFossen, Solicitor  Lawndale Road* - Sight Distance Improvements Parking Spaces Removed at Intersecting Street East Side West Side North Side South Side Intersection** Install 20 feet of yellow Curbing and 'No Parking' signs on Westbound Lane Partial mature tree Vista Road Partial mature tree obstruction on westbound lane Install 20 feet of yellow Curbing and 'No Parking' obstruction on westbound lane - T - 1 Wingert Road Valley Road signs on Westbound Lane Partial mature tree obstruction on westbound lane Install 20 feet of yellow curbing and 'No Parking' signs on Westbound Lane Install 20 feet of yellow AF Partial mature tree obstruction on westbound lane Partial mature tree obstruction on westbound lane Partial small tree obstruction on eastbound lane Install Stop sign and Stop - - - - 1 1 Daleview Road R curbing and 'No Parking' signs Bar in eastbound Lane on Westbound Lane Partial mature tree Install Stop sign and Stop Bar obstruction on westbound in Westbound Lane Install 20 feet of yellow lane Install 15 feet of yellow curbing and 'No Parking' Install 15 feet of yellow curbing and 'No Parking' signs on signs on southbound Lane northbound Lane Install 15 feet of yellow curbing and 'No Parking' Install 15 feet of yellow 3 D Edgedale Road Woodland Road curbing and 'No Parking' signs on Westbound Lane - *Lawndale Road is notated to run East - West ** Typical Borough on-street parking spaces are 22 feet in length - - signs on southbound Lane - curbing and 'No Parking' signs on northbound Lane - 3 0 9 LAWNDALE ROAD PROPOSED SIGHT DISTANCE IMPROVEMENTS WYOMISSING BOROUGH, BERKS COUNTY VISTA ROAD WINGERT ROAD VALLEY ROAD T DALEVIEW ROAD EDGEDALE ROAD WOODLAND ROAD PR 20 FT NO PARKING LAWNDALE ROAD AF PR 20 FT NO PARKING PR 20 FT NO PARKING PR 15 FT NO PARKING PR 20 FT NO PARKING PR 15 FT NO PARKING PR 15 FT NO PARKING PR 20 FT NO PARKING PR 15 FT NO PARKING R PR STOP SIGN INSTALLATION (2 EA) D 2025 IMAGERY TYPICAL 2-WAY STOP INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE IMPROVEMENTS Lawndale Road, Wyomissing Borough WINGERT ROAD WINGERT ROAD T AFPROPOSED PROPOSED OF OF YELLOW YELLOW 2020 LFLF CURB CURB PROPOSED 'NO PROPOSED 'NO PARKING HERE TO PARKING HERE TO CORNER' SIGN CORNER' SIGN LAWNDALE LAWNDALE ROAD ROAD R EXISTING 'NO PARKING' AREA CURB TO BE PAINTED YELLOW D 2018 IMAGERY 2018 IMAGERY TYPICAL 4-WAY STOP INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE IMPROVEMENTS Lawndale Road, Wyomissing Borough PROPOSED 'NO PARKING HERE TO DALEVIEW ROAD CORNER' PROPOSEDSIGN 'NO PARKING HERE TO DALEVIEW ROAD T CORNER' PROPOSEDSIGN 15 LF OF YELLOW CURB PROPOSED 15 LF OF YELLOW CURB PROPOSED 'NO PARKING' SIGN PROPOSED 'NO PARKING' SIGN AF PROPOSED PROPOSED OF 20 LF 20 LF YELLOW OF YELLOW CURBCURB LAWNDALE PROPOSED PROPOSED PARKING PARKING HERE CORNER' CORNER' ROAD ROAD LAWNDALE 'NO'NO SIGN HERE TO TO SIGN R PROPOSED 15 LF OF YELLOW CURB PROPOSED 15 LF PROPOSED OF YELLOW'NO CURB PARKING HERE TO EXISTING 'NO PARKING' AREA CURB TO BE PAINTED YELLOW D CORNER' SIGN PROPOSED 'NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER' SIGN 2018IMAGERY 2018 IMAGERY  T AF Intersection of Daleview Rd & Lawndale Rd – Looking West DR Intersection of Daleview Rd & Lawndale Rd – Looking South  T AF Intersection of Wingert Rd & Lawndale Rd – Looking West DR Intersection of Vista Rd & Lawndale Rd – Looking West  WYOMISSING FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE CHIEF 1259 Penn Avenue, Wyomissing, PA 19610 - (610) 375-4436 July Fire and Police Committee Monthly Responses: 104 Average Response Time: sssec Mutual Aid Given: 40 T Mutual Aid Received: 20 AF l tal calls for th Vear: Update on New Radios: 1086 Our Current Radios are on the list of radios that we can purchase. We "could" keep the current ones for a few more years and hope they do not break and need repair, however, we will not be able to get the offered "discounted" price at that time. (STILL WAITING FOR THE EXACT PRICES) D Volunteer Lieutenant Appointed: Dan Macrina was appointed Lieutenant. He will report directly to the Chief R and his responsibilities include volunteer recruitment and retention, volunteer orientation and initial training. He is the POC for people who inquire about volunteering in the Borough. Fire Station Renovations: Current plan from 2024 is insufficient. A new plan needs to be formulated. Fire Apparatus Committee: Currently working on a spec for a tractor drawn aerial. This is the only platform that will allow enough compartment space to achieve desired ground ladder compliment, maneuverability and performance for the future. (Thinking about where we will be in 10-15 years) More to follow. 10-year Plan: Have begun working on a 2-5-1 O year plan for the department. More to follow. Berks Chief Officer Group: T Met on July 13th with Chiefs from City of Reading, Muhlenberg, Cumru, Western Berks and Discussed Chief 79's proposed Standard Operating Guidelines for Accountability and Fireground Operations. Discussions went AF well and the attending Chiefs all agreed to look at adopting the policies and guidelines. Also agreed to work on getting changes at Berks DES together. City of Reading adding a "working fire profile" which will increase runs into the city for L79. They in turn have agreed to provide more equipment on our box assignments as well. Surrounding departments all on board with changing running assignments to D ensure we all get career staffed (qualified) ynits on the road for initial box assignments. R Next meeting taking place in August at Wyo Fire Station. N w E 's needed for the de artment: Getting quotes to replace 5 AED's for the department. All current ones are almost to EOL cycle and cannot get replacement parts for repairs if needed. Will be discussing with Relief at next meeting beginning of next month. Zone 4 Meeting: Next meeting in August Training: Reading Fire Conference coming up in September. Members are signing up to attend Advanced Rope Rescue Course. Chief 79 will be attending LODD Planning Session at YAU FR in August. Formal Training plan for 2027 will be completed by December 1 st • Joint with the Wyo PD already discussed with Chief Phillips and multipletraining joint T trainings with them and being looked at as well. Joint trainings with City and other surrounding Dept's also being discussed. Grants: AF Awaiting final word on multiple grants for Station Reno and Turnout Gear See attached Mutual Aid, Response by Shift, and Response Time Reports for more information. DR D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T D R AF T