Muyni
← Back to Alamo Heights

City Council

Regular Meeting

Alamo Heights, TX · February 16, 2021

Agenda

Agenda

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD AGENDA February 16, 2021 In accordance with order of the Office of the Governor issued March 16, 2020, where he temporary suspended certain provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act, take notice that a regular meeting scheduled at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, february 16, 2021 will be conducted by telephone conference via Zoom in order to advance the public health goal of limiting face-to-face meetings (also called “social distancing”), to slow the spread of the Coronavims (COVID-19), to consider and act upon any lawful subjects which may come before it. There will be no public access to Alamo Heights Council Chamber. This supplemental written notice, the meeting agenda, and the agenda packet, are posted online at www.alamoheightstx.gov. INSTRUCTIONS FOR TELECONfERENCE: The public toll-free dial-in number to participate in the telephonic meeting is 346-248-7799 and enter access number 86801845240#. The public will be pennitted to offer public comments telephonically as provided by the agenda and as permitted by the presiding officer during the meeting. A recording of the telephonic meeting will be made, and will be available to the public in accordance with the Open Meetings Act upon written request. To address the Board, please select *9 on your phone; this will place you in queue for speaking. A. CALL MEETING TO ORDER B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 17, 2020 and December 15, 2020 C. SIGNS Case No. 830 S Request of Comet Signs, applicant, for permanent signage at 5410 Broadway (CareNow Urgent Care). Rescheduledfrom January 19, 2021 — D. DEMOLITION REVIEW Case No. 82$ F Request of the John Grable, FATA, of John Grabic Architects, applicant, representing Frank E. Holmes, owner, for the compatibility review of the proposed design located at 820 Cambridge in order to construct a new single-family residence with detached accessory structures under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). Rescheditledfrom Janttaiy 19, 2021 — Case No. 827 F Request of David R. Youngquist of Cobblestone Investments, applicant, representing Rachel Kenney, owner, for the significance review of the existing main structure located at 218 Normandy in order to demolish 100% of the existing single-family residence and accessory structure(s) under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). Rescheduledfrom Januaiy 19, 2021 — Case No. 829 F Request of Peter DeWitt, MA, applicant, representing Elizabeth and John Diggs, owners, for the compatibility review of the proposed design located at 406 Kokomo in order to construct an addition to the rear and side of the existing single-family residence with attached garage under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). Rescheduledfrom January 19, 2021 — Case No. 831 F Request of Faustino Mancha Jr of Fauman Construction, applicant, representing Cipriano Espino, owner, for the significance review of the existing main structure located at 103 Elmview E in order to demolish 100% of the existing single-family residence and accessory structure(s) under Demolition Review Ordinance No. I $60 (April 12, 2010). Case No. $33 F Request of Jim and Sharon Spivey, owners, for the significance review of the existing main structure and compatibility review of the proposed design located at 320 Primrose in order to demolish 66% of the existing roof and 53% of the street facing façade in order to remodel and add to the front and rear of the existing single- family residence with attached accessory structure under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). Case No. $24 F Request of Blair Jones of Blair Jones Co., owner, for the significance review of the existing main structure and compatibility review of the proposed design located at 241 Fair Oaks E in order to demolish 100% of the existing structures and construct a new single-family residence with detached accessory structure under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). Signflcance review reschedttled — from January 19, 2021 Case No. 834 F Request of Doreen S. Patino, owner, for the significance review of the existing main structure and compatibility review of the proposed design located at 165 Claywell in order to demolish 100% of the existing residence and accessory structure(s) and construct a new single-family residence with detached accessory structure under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). Case No. 835 F Request of Logan Green of Green Innovations Homes, applicant, representing James Rothfelder, owner, for the significance review of the existing main structure and compatibility review of the proposed design located at 136 Claywell in order to demolish 49.72% of the existing street-facing elevation, demolish 66.12% of the existing roof, and 57.21% of all exterior walls in order to remodel and add to the existing single-family residence with attached accessory structure under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). Case No. 832 F Request of Joseph Valdez of Valdez Designs, applicant, representing James W. and Jessica Collings, owners, for the compatibility review of the proposed design located at 730 Corona in order to construct a new single-family residence with detached accessory structures under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010). E. ADJOURNMENT DISABILITY ACCESS STATEMENT This meeting site is wheelchair accessible. The accessible entrance is located at 6116 Broadway St. Accessible visitor parking spaces are located at the rear entrance of City Hall. Accommodations or interpretive services are available upon request and must be made seventy-two [72] hours prior to the meeting. For assistance, call the City Secretary at (210) 832-2209. CERTIFICATE I certify that the above notice of meeting was posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall of the City of Alamo Heights, Texas, at 6116 Broadway St on February 12, 2021 at 11:30 p.m.

Get email alerts for Alamo Heights

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting