Antioch Police Oversight Commission

ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION AGENDA Date: Monday, July 7, 2025 Time: 6:30 P.M. Place: Antioch City Hall – Council Chambers 200 H Street Antioch, CA 94509 ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSIONERS Porshe Taylor, Chairperson Devin Williams, Vice Chairperson Treva Hadden Alicia Dianne Lacey-Oha Lisa Elekwachi Susan Kennedy Joseph Mitchell Staff Liaison: Bessie Marie Scott, City Manager Kevin W. Kundinger, Assistant City Attorney Joseph Vigil, Police Chief Commission meetings are live streamed at: https://www.antiochca.gov/government/boards-commissions/#section-apoc. Please see the inside cover for detailed Speaker Rules. ACCESSIBILITY: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law, it is the policy of the City of Antioch to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format; or if you require any other accommodation, please contact the ADA Coordinator at the number or address below at least 72 hours prior to the meeting or when you desire to receive services. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. The City’s ADA Coordinator can be reached @ Phone: (925) 779-6950, and e-mail: publicworks@antiochca.gov. PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES BEFORE ENTERING MEETING LOCATION.  ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION SPEAKER RULES Welcome to the Antioch Police Oversight Commission meeting. The Commission encourages community participation. The Ralph M. Brown Act guarantees the public's right to address the Commission, within the framework of Speaker Rules. Because agendas encompass many business items, Speaker Rules enable the meeting to be efficiently conducted and concluded at a reasonable hour. How to submit a Public Comment – Members of the public wishing to provide public comments, may do so one of the following ways: 1) Written Public Comment – Written comments may be submitted electronically to the City Clerk at the following email address: cityclerk@antiochca.gov, prior to 3:00 p.m. the day of the Commission Meeting. Please indicate the agenda item in your email subject line. Written public comments received before 3:00 p.m., the day of the meeting, will be provided to the Commissioners before the meeting. 2) In Person – Please fill out a Speaker Request Form, available near the entrance doors, and place it in the Speaker Card Tray near the City Clerk before the meeting begins. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When you are called to speak, please limit your comments to the time allotted (up to 3 minutes). If there are several speakers, the amount of time allotted may be modified at the Chairperson’s discretion. Record of all public comments – All public comments will become part of the official public record and subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. All public comments will be retained on file by the City Clerk’s Office; entered into the official meeting record and will be available to the public upon request. Written public comments will not be read during the Commission Meeting. Notice of Availability of Reports The Antioch Police Oversight Commission will meet regularly on the first and third Mondays of the month at 6:30 p.m. (except during the months of July and December when regular meetings shall occur once per month). The Antioch Police Oversight Commission Agendas are posted onto the City’s Website 72 hours before each meeting. To be notified when the agenda packets are posted onto our City’s Website, simply click on this link: https://www.antiochca.gov/notifications/ and enter your e-mail address to subscribe. To view the agenda information, please click on the following link: https://www.antiochca.gov/government/boards-commissions/#section-apoc.  ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION’S PURPOSE The purpose of the Commission is to advise the City Council, City Manager, and Chief of Police on the administration of the Antioch Police Department and on matters of public safety within the City of Antioch to ensure that the Antioch Police Department's policies, practices, and customs conform to national standards of constitutional policing. [Ordinance No. 2212-C-S, adopted May 24, 2022: https://www.antiochca.gov/fc/posc/posc-ord-2212.pdf]. NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION This agenda is a summary of the discussion items/actions proposed to be taken by the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. The public has the opportunity to address the Commission on each agenda item. The Commission can only take action on items that are listed on the agenda. Comments regarding matters not on this Agenda may be addressed during the "Public Comments" section on this agenda. No one may speak more than once on an agenda item or during “Public Comments”. Please see the Speaker Rules on the inside cover of this Agenda for information on public participation. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. By approval of the Consent Calendar, the staff recommendations will be adopted unless a commissioner or a member of the public requests’ removal of an item from the Consent Calendar. 3-1. ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 16, 2025 Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Antioch Police Oversight Commission approve the Meeting Minutes of June 16, 2025. 4. NEW BUSINESS 4-1. POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH VIGIL’S REPORT The Police Chief (or designee) will provide an update on information relevant to the mission, purpose, and work of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. A. Staff Presentation – New Hire Status Update B. 2024 Hate Crimes and Data Report Presentation C. Public Comment D. Commission Discussion and Direction ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION [1] JULY 7, 2025  4-2. ADOPT THE RESOLUTIONS CONFIRMING THE ROLE, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS TO THE FOLLOWING APPROVED AD HOC COMMITTEES: 1) COMMISSION READINESS; 2) FISCAL MANAGEMENT; AND 3) PUBLIC TRUST AND ENGAGEMENT AD HOC COMMITTEES FOR TWELVE (12) MONTHS A. Staff Presentation B. Public Comment C. Commission Discussion Confirming the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment to the Approved Ad Hoc Committees for twelve (12) months. D. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Antioch Police Oversight Commission take the following actions: 1) Adopt the resolution approving the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment to the approved Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months with Commissioners ________, ________, and ________, as members. 2) Adopt the resolution approving the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment to the approved Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months with Commissioners ________, ________, and ________, as members. 3) Adopt the resolution approving the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment to the approved Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months with Commissioners ________, ________, and ________, as members. 4-3. DISCUSSION ITEM: INPUT ON AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2212-C-S THAT CREATED THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION A. Staff Presentation B. Public Comment C. Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Antioch Police Oversight Commission receive a presentation on the background and current ordinance that established this Commission, as well as proposed changes staff is considering, and offer additional recommendations for the City Council to consider when this information is presented to the City Council. ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION [2] JULY 7, 2025 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Members of the public are given the opportunity to address the Commission on an item that is not on the agenda; up to three (3) minutes. If there are several speakers, the amount of time allotted may be modified at the Chairperson’s discretion. 6. AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT OUT The ad hoc committee members will provide updates on their committee’s work and plans for the future. 7. UPCOMING/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS The Commission will engage in a working session to discuss and determine agenda items for the upcoming Commission meeting, and to agree on a list of agenda items to be discussed on future agendas. The Commission will work on creating a list of agenda items for future meetings. 8. ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSIONER REPORT OUT (3 minutes per commissioner) Each commissioner will have an opportunity to provide an update on information relevant to the mission, purpose, and work of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Staff may provide an update on information relevant to the mission, purpose, and work of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. 10. NEXT MEETING DATE – August 4, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. 11. ADJOURNMENT After Staff Communications, the Chairperson/Vice Chairperson will make a motion to adjourn the meeting. A second motion is required, and then a majority vote is required to adjourn the meeting. ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION [3] JULY 7, 2025  CITY OF ANTIOCH ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Regular Meeting June 16, 2025 6:30 P.M. City Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chairperson Taylor called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, June 16, 2025, in Council Chambers. Acting City Clerk Eiden called the roll. Present: Commissioners Elekwachi, Kennedy, Mitchell, Vice Chairperson Williams and Chairperson Taylor Absent: Commissioners Hadden and Lacey-Oha Staff: City Manager, Bessie Marie Scott Lieutenant, Matthew Koch Executive Consultant, Brian Addington Acting City Clerk Kitty Eiden 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairperson Taylor led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3-1 APPROVAL OF THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 5, 2025 3-2 APPROVAL OF THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 19, 2025 3-3 APPROVAL OF THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 2, 2025 On motion by Commissioner Williams, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission members present unanimously approved the Consent Calendar. 4. NEW BUSINESS 4-1 POLICE CHIEF JOSEPH VIGIL’S REPORT A. Staff Presentation - Police Department Updates Lieutenant Koch gave an update on Antioch Police Department (APD) staffing. B. Public Comment – None 3-1 07-07-25 Antioch Police Oversight Commission Regular Meeting June 16, 2025 Page 2 of 5 C. Commission Discussion and Direction Lieutenant Koch provided responses to inquiries from the APOC regarding the APD staffing update. 5. DISCUSSION ITEM: NEW AD HOC COMMITTEES FORMATION (COMMISSION READINESS, FISCAL MANAGEMENT, AND PUBLIC TRUST & ENGAGEMENT) Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Antioch Police Oversight Commission: • Adopt the resolution forming the Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) with Commissioners __________, __________, and _____________. • Adopt the resolution forming the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) with Commissioners __________, __________, and _____________ as members. • Adopt the resolution forming the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months with Commissioners __________, __________, and _____________ as members. On motion by Commissioner Kennedy, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission members present unanimously approved forming the Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee, Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee, and Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee. 6. DISCUSSION ITEM: AD HOC ASSIGNMENTS FOR NEW COMMISSIONERS Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Antioch Police Oversight Commission discuss Ad Hoc Committee assignments for new commissioners and term limits. Commissioner Readiness Ad Hoc Committee Commissioners Kennedy, Mitchell, and Elekwachi volunteered to serve on the Commissioner Readiness Ad Hoc Committee. Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee Chairperson Taylor and Commissioners Hadden, and Mitchell volunteered to serve on the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee. Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee Commissioners Williams and Kennedy volunteered to serve on the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee. It was also mentioned that Commissioner Lacey-Oha had expressed interest in serving on this Ad Hoc Committee. Antioch Police Oversight Commission Regular Meeting June 16, 2025 Page 3 of 5 Chairperson Taylor directed the Ad Hoc Committees to schedule their meetings, form descriptions and responsibilities. She stated that the Ad Hoc Committees should be creating share points and tracking meeting minutes, taking attendance and reporting out on attendance and work accomplished. She encouraged the Ad Hoc Committees to meet at least once between APOC meetings. 7. DISCUSSION ITEM: FELTON INSTITUTE PRESENTATION - ANGELO QUINTO COMMUMITY RESPONSE TEAM (AQCRT) Alisea Wesley-Clark, Program Director, presented the Felton Institute Presentation – Angelo Quinto Crisis Response Team PowerPoint Presentation. Alisea Wesley-Clark provided responses to inquiries from the APOC regarding the presentation. Commissioner Kennedy suggested ensuring terminology was consistent as it related to referencing calls that were refused. Commissioner Mitchell suggested the provider track data on refusals. Chairperson Taylor stated she would email Ms. Clark to obtain demographics data related to race, veterans, LGBTQ communities and youth. She stated she would share that information with the Commission. The Commission thanked Ms. Clark for the presentation. Chairperson Taylor requested a recess at 7:13 P.M. On motion by Commissioner Kennedy, seconded by Commissioner Elekwachi, the APOC members present unanimously recessed at 7:13 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 7:21 P.M. with all Commissioners present with the exception of Commissioners Lacey-Oha and Hadden who were previously reported as absent and Commissioner Elekwachi who returned at 7:22 P.M. 8. DISCUSSION ITEM: OVERVIEW OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ) Executive Consultant Addington presented the USDOJ Agreement Presentation recommending the Antioch Police Oversight Commission receive and file the presentation. Manjit Sappal, MS Investigative Services and Consulting, LLC, explained that this role presented a great opportunity to collaborate with the community, APOC, and APD to implement sustainable changes that would benefit the community. He provided a history of his policing experience in Contra Costa County. Antioch Police Oversight Commission Regular Meeting June 16, 2025 Page 4 of 5 Executive Consultant Addington reported that a California Department of Justice investigation was ongoing, and several lawsuits had been consolidated into a federal civil rights lawsuit, which was currently underway. Additionally, there was discussion about potential additional terms that could be included or provided through a separate agreement. Executive Consultant Addington and Mr. Sappal provided responses to inquiries from the APOC regarding the settlement agreement. Commissioner Kennedy expressed concern regarding the potential impacts of Executive Order 14168 on the USDOJ agreement. Chairperson Taylor requested APD continue to provide aggregate data to the APOC quarterly. Commissioner Williams thanked Mr. Sappal for the presentation and encouraged him to engage with community advocates. Commissioner Mitchell requested Mr. Sappal provide the APOC with the implementation schedule. Chairperson Taylor thanked Executive Consultant Addington and Mr. Sappal for the presentation. The Commission received public comment from the following individual who spoke on the settlement agreement: Frank Sterling. 9. PUBLIC COMMENTS The Commission received general public comment from the following individual: Frank Sterling. 10. AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT OUT Police Practices Ad Hoc Committee Commissioners Elekwachi and Williams reported on their attendance at the Police Practices Ad Hoc Committee meeting. 11. UPCOMING/ FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Discussion ensued regarding the APOC members’ priorities for future agenda items and Commission consensus for the following priority requests included: ➢ Finalizing purpose, descriptions and responsibilities for each Ad Hoc Committee ➢ APOC Ordinance recommendation discussion ➢ REACH Presentation ➢ New Hire Update for APD Antioch Police Oversight Commission Regular Meeting June 16, 2025 Page 5 of 5 ➢ APD overtime budget comparison (referred to the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee) Chairperson Taylor suggested Ad Hoc Committees assign someone to take the lead role, schedule meeting times, discuss roles and responsibilities and present that information at the next APOC meeting. 12. ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSIONER REPORT OUT Commissioner Mitchell reported on his attendance at graduation events, city park cleanup and a Neighborhood Watch meeting. He expressed concern regarding health and safety items at City park. Commissioner Kennedy reported on her attendance at the Neighborhood Watch meeting, a sit- along with APD dispatch, and a ride-along with APD officers. She acknowledged APD’s professional and proactive approach in responding to a call to action from protesters. She announced that June is Pride Month and expressed concern over the vandalization of banners. She encouraged everyone to work together to co-exist peacefully. She also thanked Lieutenant Koch for arranging her ride-along and expressed her enthusiasm about collaborating with Mr. Sappal in the future. Finally, she extended her gratitude to everyone committed to making the City a better place. 13. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS – None 14. NEXT MEETING DATE – July 7, 2025, at 6:30 P.M. Chairperson Taylor announced the next Antioch Police Oversight Commission meeting would be held at 6:30 P.M. on July 7, 2025. 15. ADJOURNMENT On motion by Commissioner Williams, seconded by Commissioner Elekwachi the Antioch Police Oversight Commission members present unanimously adjourned at 8:26 P.M. Respectfully submitted: Kitty Eiden KITTY EIDEN, Minutes Clerk 2024 Hate Crimes Antioch PD A/Lt. Bill W hitaker #4-1.B Agenda • Definition • CA Penal Code • Case Summaries • Questions In California, a hate crime is defined as any criminal act motivated by the victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, ancestr y, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. These crimes involve targeting individuals or groups because of these specific characteristics, leading to harm, intimidation, or terror. 422.6 (a) A person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall not, by force or threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress, or threaten any other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of a right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of this state or by the Constitution or laws of the United States in whole or in part because of one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in subdivision (a) of Section 422.55. (b) A person, whether or not acting under color of law, shall not knowingly deface, damage, or destroy the real or personal property of any other person for the purpose of intimidating or interfering with the free exercise or enjoyment of a right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of this state or by the Constitution or laws of the United States, in whole or in part because of one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim listed in subdivision (a) of Section 422.55. (c) A person convicted of violating subdivision (a) or (b) shall be punished either by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by both the above imprisonment and fine, or pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170. In addition to that punishment, the court shall order the defendant to perform a minimum of community service, not to exceed 400 hours, to be performed over a period not to exceed 350 days, during a time other than the person’s hours of employment or school attendance. However, a person shall not be convicted of violating subdivision (a) based upon speech alone, except upon a showing that the speech itself threatened violence against a specific person or group of persons and that the defendant had the apparent ability to carry out the threat. (d) Conduct that violates this and any other law, including, but not limited to, an offense described in Article 4.5 (commencing with Section 11410) of Chapter 3 of Title 1 of Part 4, may be charged under all applicable provisions. However, an act or omission punishable in different ways by this section and another law shall not be punished under more than one law, and the penalty to be imposed shall be determined as set forth in Section 654. (Amended by Stats. 2024, Ch. 821, Sec. 2. (AB 2099) Effective January 1, 2025.) 2024 Cases Case # 1 – This was a vandalism report at a local church. During the investigation, the officer located a broken window to the church building, and graffiti to a storage shed. The graffiti on the shed had derogatory language and qualified as hate speech. (Unknown SUSPECTS – no leads or evidence) Case # 2 – This case was at one of the high schools and reported by the student who was the victim. The student was threatened and then was involved in a physical altercation with several students. During the physical altercation, the student was called negative names regarding his sexuality. (ARREST made and the case was filed) Case # 3 – This was a vandalism case at a privately owned residential home. During this report, the victim displayed a pride flag in front of their house, which was taken down and lit on fire. (Unknown SUSPECTS – no leads or evidence) Case # 4 – The victim reported meeting a subject from “Grinder” at a park in Antioch. When he arrived, he was confronted by about ten people who broke all the windows of his vehicle and stole his backpack. During the incident homophobic slurs were yelled at the victim. (Unknown SUSPECTS – no leads or evidence) Case # 5 – The victim was spending time with his significant other at the Marina. They were confronted by a group of subjects who began yelling homophobic slurs at the couple. The group then began physically assaulting the couple causing significant injuries. (ARREST made and the case was filed) ** 66% Increase in Hate Crimes vs. 2023 QUESTIONS ?  STAFF REPORT TO THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION DATE: Regular Meeting of July 7, 2025 TO: Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission SUBMITTED BY: Bessie Marie Scott, City Manager SUBJECT: Adopt the Resolutions Confirming the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment of Commissioners to the following Approved Ad Hoc Committees: 1) Commission Readiness; 2) Fiscal Management; and 3) Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committees for twelve (12) months RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended that the Antioch Police Oversight Commission take the following actions: 1) Adopt the resolution approving the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment to the approved Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months with Commissioners __________, __________, and ___________ as members. 2) Adopt the resolution approving the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment to the approved Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months with Commissioners __________, __________, and _____________ as members. 3) Adopt the resolution approving the Role, Responsibilities, and Appointment to the approved Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months with Commissioners _________, _________, and __________ as members. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact for this item. DISCUSSION At its June 16, 2025 meeting, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission (APOC) approved the formation of the following ad hoc committees with the following purposes and terms: 4-2 Agenda Item # APOC Staff Report July 7, 2025 Agenda Item #4-2 (1) Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee (12-month term) The purpose of the Use of Force Ad Hoc Committee shall be to review, advise, and enhance the training practices of the police department from a community-centered perspective and work in partnership with police department leadership to promote transparency, accountability, and public trust. The committee’s primary responsibilities will include evaluating current police training programs and materials, including those related to use of force, de-escalation, cultural competency, mental health response, and community engagement and to recommend improvements and reforms that align with best practices and community expectations. Too, the committee will facilitate public input and feedback on training-related concerns, as well as monitor the implementation and effectiveness of any recommended changes. (2) Fiscal Management Hoc Committee (12-month term) The purpose of the Fiscal Management Hoc Committee shall be to review the City Council’s proposed budget, advise whether budgetary allocations for the Police Department are aligned with the Police Department’s policies and procedures, ensure that the budget adequately supports the goals of the oversight body, including promoting transparency, and community engagement. (3) Public Trust and Engagement (12-month term) The purpose of the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee shall be to develop and recommend, in conjunction with the Chief of Police and the City Manager, educational programs regarding policing in Antioch and community outreach events, such as town hall meetings, forums to communicate information about neighborhood watch programs, and events designed to encourage safety and emergency preparedness. The Antioch Police Oversight Commission approved to form these ad hoc committees to address specific issues that require immediate attention. Ad hoc committees are temporary committees formed for a specific purpose consisting of less than a quorum of the commission and are not subject to the Brown Act. Ad hoc committees are expected to complete their work within a limited period of time. The term of an ad hoc committee is generally six (6) months to (1) year and then the committee is dissolved. The Commissioners in attendance at the June 16, 2025 APOC Meeting, volunteered to serve as members of the following ad hoc committees (Commissioners Hadden and Lacey-Oha were absent): 1) Commissioner Readiness Ad Hoc Committee Commissioners Kennedy, Mitchell, and Elekwachi volunteered to serve on the Commissioner Readiness Ad Hoc Committee. APOC Staff Report July 7, 2025 Agenda Item #4-2 2) Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee Chairperson Taylor and Commissioner Mitchell volunteered to serve on the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee. It was also mentioned that Commissioner Hadden had expressed interest in serving on this Ad Hoc Committee. 3) Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee Commissioners Williams and Kennedy volunteered to serve on the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee. It was also mentioned that Commissioner Lacey-Oha had expressed interest in serving on this Ad Hoc Committee. Standard Responsibilities for all APOC Ad Hoc Committees (Attachment D) can be discussed and approved to be included with each resolution adopted at tonight’s meeting. ATTACHMENTS A. Resolution: Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee B. Resolution: Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee C. Resolution: Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee D. Standard Responsibilities for All APOC Ad Hoc Committees  ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 2025/xxx RESOLUTION OF THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION TO FORM THE COMMISSION READINESS AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE (12) MONTHS WHEREAS, on June 2, 2025, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission requested that City staff prepare a resolution establishing a Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee (the “Ad Hoc Committee”); WHEREAS, ad hoc committees are temporary committees for a specific purpose that consist of less than a majority of the commission and are not subject to the Brown Act; WHEREAS, the purpose of the Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee shall be to review, advise, and enhance the training practices of the Antioch Police Department from a community-centered perspective and work in partnership with law enforcement leadership to promote transparency, accountability, and public trust; WHEREAS, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission plans to have the Ad Hoc Committee report back to the Antioch Police Oversight Commission prior to and upon its planned termination in twelve (12) months to determine if the Ad Hoc Committee should become a standing committee on a specific subject matter on a continual basis, continue as an ad hoc committee for a limited period of time to address a specific need or purpose, or be terminated; and WHEREAS, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission seeks to confirm the appointment of committee members to the Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Antioch Police Oversight Commission of the City of Antioch hereby forms the Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months for the purpose of reviewing the City Council’s proposed Budget, advising whether financial allocations for the Police Department are aligned with the Police Department’s policies and procedures, and ensuring that the Budget adequately supports the goals of the oversight body, including promoting transparency, and community engagement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Commissioners __________, __________, and ___________ are appointed to the Commission Readiness Ad Hoc Committee and shall work to develop specific objectives for the committee and report back to the Antioch Police Oversight Commission prior to and upon the ad hoc committee’s planned termination in twelve months. * * * * * * *  I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Antioch Police Oversight Commission at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of July 2025, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________________ MELISSA RHODES CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH  ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION NO. 2025/xxx RESOLUTION OF THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION TO FORM THE FISCAL MANAGEMENT AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE (12) MONTHS WHEREAS, on June 2, 2025, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission requested that City staff prepare a resolution establishing a Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee (the “Ad Hoc Committee”); WHEREAS, ad hoc committees are temporary committees for a specific purpose that consist of less than a majority of the commission and are not subject to the Brown Act; WHEREAS, the purpose of the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee shall be to review the City Council’s proposed Budget, advise whether financial allocations for the Police Department are aligned with the Police Department’s policies and procedures, ensure that the Budget adequately supports the goals of the oversight body, including promoting transparency, and community engagement; WHEREAS, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission plans to have the Ad Hoc Committee report back to the Antioch Police Oversight Commission prior to and upon its planned termination in twelve (12) months to determine if the Ad Hoc Committee should become a standing committee on a specific subject matter on a continual basis, continue as an ad hoc committee for a limited period of time to address a specific need or purpose, or be terminated; and WHEREAS, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission seeks to confirm the appointment of committee members to the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Antioch Police Oversight Commission of the City of Antioch hereby forms the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months for the purpose of reviewing the City Council’s proposed Budget, advising whether financial allocations for the Police Department are aligned with the Police Department’s policies and procedures, and ensuring that the Budget adequately supports the goals of the oversight body, including promoting transparency, and community engagement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Commissioners __________, __________, and ___________ are appointed to the Fiscal Management Ad Hoc Committee and shall work to develop specific objectives for the committee and report back to the Antioch Police Oversight Commission prior to and upon the ad hoc committee’s planned termination in twelve months. * * * * * * *  I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Antioch Police Oversight Commission at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of July 2025, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________________ MELISSA RHODES CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH  ATTACHMENT C RESOLUTION NO. 2025/xxx RESOLUTION OF THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION TO FORM THE PUBLIC TRUST AND ENGAGEMENT AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE (12) MONTHS WHEREAS, on June 2, 2025, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission requested that City staff prepare a resolution establishing a Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee (the “Ad Hoc Committee”); WHEREAS, ad hoc committees are temporary committees for a specific purpose that consist of less than a majority of the commission and are not subject to the Brown Act; WHEREAS, the purpose of the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee shall be to develop and recommend, in conjunction with the Chief of Police and the City Manager, educational programs regarding policing in Antioch and community outreach events, such as town hall meetings, forums to communicate information about neighborhood watch programs, and events designed to encourage safety and emergency preparedness; WHEREAS, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission plans to have the Ad Hoc Committee report back to the Antioch Police Oversight Commission prior to and upon its planned termination in twelve (12) months to determine if the Ad Hoc Committee should become a standing committee on a specific subject matter on a continual basis, continue as an ad hoc committee for a limited period of time to address a specific need or purpose, or be terminated; and WHEREAS, the Antioch Police Oversight Commission seeks to confirm the appointment of committee members to the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Antioch Police Oversight Commission of the City of Antioch hereby forms the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee for a term of twelve (12) months for the purpose of reviewing the City Council’s proposed budget, advising whether budgetary allocations for the Police Department are aligned with the Police Department’s policies and procedures, and ensuring that the budget adequately supports the goals of the oversight body, including promoting transparency, and community engagement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Commissioners __________, __________, and ___________ are appointed to the Public Trust and Engagement Ad Hoc Committee and shall work to develop specific objectives for the committee and report back to the Antioch Police Oversight Commission prior to and upon the ad hoc committee’s planned termination in twelve months. * * * * * * *  I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Antioch Police Oversight Commission of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of July 2025, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ___________________________________ MELISSA RHODES CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH  ATTACHMENT D Standard Responsibilities for All APOC Ad Hocs 1. Appoint an Ad Hoc Lead Each ad hoc shall nominate and confirm one commissioner to serve as the lead, responsible for coordinating meetings, setting agendas, and ensuring timely progress on tasks. 2. Designate a Notetaker One member shall be assigned to take clear notes during each meeting, documenting action items, decisions, and deadlines. Notes shall be stored in the shared digital workspace. 3. Create and Maintain a SharePoint Folder (or Equivalent Workspace) All materials, including meeting notes, documents, and resources, must be organized in a dedicated folder accessible to all commissioners and staff. 4. Designate a Report-Out Representative Each ad hoc shall identify a member responsible for reporting progress during public APOC meetings. This person may rotate or remain consistent based on committee preference. 5. Maintain a Regular Meeting Cadence Ad hocs must meet at least monthly (or more frequently as needed). Meetings must be scheduled in advance and documented to maintain momentum and transparency. 6. Collect and Document Attendance Attendance must be recorded for each ad hoc meeting. The list of attendees (including guests or staff, if applicable) shall be included in the meeting notes and archived in the shared workspace. 7. Submit Written Updates Prior to Each Full APOC Meeting A written summary of progress, challenges, and next steps must be submitted to the Chair or Secretary before each commission meeting to support transparent reporting. 8. Ensure Alignment with APOC Ordinance (§4-3.110) All work must reflect the commission’s legal responsibilities, including reviewing police policy, recommending changes, promoting public trust, and ensuring data-informed oversight. 9. Engage City Staff When Appropriate Ad hocs may coordinate with city departments, legal advisors, or external consultants for data, insight, or support—provided proper procedures are followed. "Please note  that ad hoc committees operate independently and are not supported by assigned city staff." 10. Respect Confidentiality and Governance Protocols Any sensitive discussions, personnel matters, or draft recommendations shall remain internal until formally approved for release by the commission. 11. Plan for Sustainability and Transitions When membership changes, outgoing members must ensure new participants are properly briefed and given access to prior work and resources.  STAFF REPORT TO THE ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISION DATE: Regular Meeting of July 7, 2025 TO: Honorable Chairperson and Members of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission SUBMITTED BY: Bessie Marie Scott, City Manager SUBJECT: Discussion Item: Input on Amendment to Ordinance No. 2212-C-S that Created the Antioch Police Oversight Commission RECOMMENDED ACTION It is recommended that the Antioch Police Oversight Commission receive a presentation on the background and current ordinance that established this Commission, as well as proposed changes staff is considering, and offer additional recommendations for the City Council to consider when this information is presented to the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact for this item. DISCUSSION In 2020, the City Council directed staff to research and recommend a civilian oversight body for the Antioch Police Department. This led to the adoption of Ordinance No. 2212- C-S in 2022, which established the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. The commission held its first meeting on March 18, 2024. As part of the City’s ongoing commitment to transparency, accountability, and community trust, staff is reviewing the Antioch Police Oversight Commission ordinance. This effort is being carried out in response to City Council direction and aims to identify opportunities to strengthen the Commission’s structure, clarify its authority, and improve its effectiveness. One of the main goals of this review is to ensure consistency with best practices in civilian oversight and to support compliance with the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Antioch and the U.S. Department of Justice. Gathering input from the Police Oversight Commission is a crucial step in refining the ordinance and supporting the City’s public safety reforms. The input from the Antioch Police Oversight Commission will be carefully reviewed alongside staff’s proposed amendments. All recommendations will be compiled and submitted to the City Council for review and further guidance. This collaborative effort aims to ensure that any revisions to the ordinance reflect community values, enhance oversight effectiveness, and support the City’s broader goals of transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. 4-3 Agenda Item # APOC Staff Report July 7, 2025 Agenda Item #4-3 ATTACHMENTS A. Ordinance No. 2212-C-S, Antioch Police Oversight Commission B. PowerPoint Staff Presentation C. Draft APOC Rules of Decorum and Conduct Policy ATTACHMENT A  (b) one (1) representative of the Antioch faith-based community; (c) one (1) representative of the Antioch business community; and (d) one (1) employee or student of the Antioch Unified School District. (D) No one shall be excluded from the Police Commission because he or she has a criminal record. (E) The following shall not be eligible to serve as a Police Commissioner: (a) current sworn police officer or his/her spouse; (b) current City employee or his/her spouse; (c) former Department sworn employee or his/her spouse; or (d) current or former employee, official, or representative of an employee association representing sworn police officers or his/her spouse. (F) Commissioners shall not be issued and shall not display, wear, or carry badges that so resemble a peace officer's badge that an ordinary reasonable person would believe that Commissioners have the authority of a peace officer. § 4-3.104 TERMS OF OFFICE AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE. (A) The terms of office for all members of the Police Commission shall be three years, but the terms of not more than three (3) members shall expire in any one year. Therefore, when the initial seven (7) members are selected, two (2) commissioners shall be appointed to serve an initial one-year term, two (2) commissioners shall be appointed to serve an initial two-year term, and the remaining three (3) shall serve an initial three­ year term. No members shall serve for more than two consecutive full terms. For this purpose, the initial one-year and two-year terms in this paragraph shall be considered full terms. The expiration date of all terms shall be November 30, but each member shall serve until his or her successor is duly appointed and qualified. (B) A member may resign before the expiration of his or her term with written notification to the chairperson of the Police Commission and the Mayor. (C) Members of the Police Commission shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council and may be removed from office by a majority vote of the Council. (D) The Police Commission may recommend to the City Council that a member be removed for reasons including but not limited to: (a) misuse of position as a Police Commission member; Ordinance No. 2212-C-S Page 3 May 24, 2022  b) misuse of police- issued documents; c) misconduct that impedes the member' s ability to serve as an effective and impartial Police Commission member; d) unexcused absences from at least three meetings in a one- year span of time; e) violation of the Code of Ethics of the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement ( NACOLE); or f) conflict of interest. E) Upon receipt of notification of resignation or a Council vote of removal, the position shall be considered vacant and eligible for the Mayor to nominate a replacement commissioner for appointment with confirmation by the City Council. The replacement commissioner shall serve for the remainder of the term and be eligible for reappointment for one additional term. 4- 3. 105 OFFICERS. During January of each year, the Police Commission shall elect one of its members as chairperson and one as vice- chairperson who shall each hold office for one ( 1) year or until their respective successors are elected. After all Police Commission members have been appointed and confirmed, officers shall be elected no later than the second meeting of the Police Commission. No officer shall be eligible to serve more than two consecutive terms in the same office. 4- 3. 106 MEETINGS. A) The Police Commission shall hold its first meeting within thirty days after all of its members have been appointed and confirmed. At the first meeting, the Police Commission shall set the time and date of regularly scheduled meetings, which shall occur at least twice each month, except during the months of July and December when regular meetings shall occur once per month. Regular meetings of the Police Commission shall be held at Antioch City Hall except for meetings held under section 4- 3. 060( B). The Police Commission shall notify the public of the time and place of its meetings and provide time for public comment at each meeting in compliance with the Brown Act. B) At least two meetings of the Police Commission each year shall be held at locations within the City of Antioch other than City Hall for the purpose increasing community engagement with the Police Commission. The Police Commission shall make a good faith effort to hold these meetings at public schools, youth centers, or community- based organizations within the City of Antioch. Ordinance No. 2212- C- S Page 4 May 24, 2022  C) All Police Commission meetings are subject to the Brown Act. D) In the interest of upholding and modeling a positive relationship between the citizens of Antioch and the Antioch Police Department, the Antioch Chief of Police, or his or her designee, shall attend the beginning of all public meetings of the Police Commission and, as the first order of new business, be placed on the agenda to comment or report on any matters under consideration by the Police Commission. 4- 3. 107 NO COMPENSATION. Members of the Police Commission shall serve without compensation. However, the City Council may authorize the reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred by the members in the performance of their duties. 4- 3. 108 BUDGET. The City shall provide the Police Commission with funding for general operating expenses, training, and continuing education for all Police Commissioners. 4- 3. 109 TRAINING. The City shall provide appropriate funding for introductory training of new Police Commission members as well as for all continuing education members. Training shall cover all of the following, but not be limited to: A) The ordinance establishing the Police Commission; B) National standards of constitutional policing; C) Department operations, policies, procedures, practices, and programs; D) Laws governing local public records and public meetings, confidentiality, police officer rights, arrestee rights, and excessive force; and E) Police policies, practices, and procedures around stops, arrests, use of force, detention, large- scale protests, and marginalized communities. 4- 3. 110 POWERS AND DUTIES. To effectuate its purpose, the Police Commission shall, in compliance with the California Public Records Act ( Gov. Code, §§ 6250 et seq.), Penal Code Sections 832. 7 and 832. 8; California Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act ( Gov. Code, §§ 3300 et seq.), Government Code section 38630, Government Code section 37104, Penal Code section 832. 7, and all other applicable state and federal law: Ordinance No. 2212- C- S Page 5 May 24, 2022  A) Propose changes, at its discretion or upon receiving direction from the City Council, including modifications to the Police Department' s proposed changes, to any or of the Police Department that govern First Amendment policies procedures assemblies, use of force, use of canines, use of de- escalation techniques on civilians, hate crimes, or biased- based policing including profiling based on any of the protected characteristics identified by federal, state, or local law. All such proposed changes and modifications shall be submitted to the City Council for approval or rejection. Recommend City Council approval or rejection of the Police Department's B) proposed changes to all policies and procedures of the Police Department that govern First Amendment assemblies, use of force, use of canines, use of de- escalation techniques with civilians, hate crimes, or biased- based policing including profiling based on any of the protected characteristics identified by federal, state, or local law. a) If the Police Commission recommends rejection of the proposed policy, the Police Department' s proposed changes, notice of the Commission' s rejection, and the reasons for rejection, together with the Police Department's proposed changes, shall be submitted to the City Council for review. b) If the Police Commission recommends approval of the Police Department's policy, the Police Department's proposed changes will proceed directly to the City Council for review. c) If the Police Commission does not approve or reject the Police Department' s proposed changes within sixty ( 60) days of the Police Department' s submission of the proposed changes to the Police Commission, the Police Department's proposed changes will proceed directly to the City Council for review. C) Review and comment on, at its discretion, any other policies, procedures, customs, and general orders of the Police Department. All such comments shall be submitted to the Chief of Police, the City Manager, and the City Attorney. The Chief of Police shall provide a written response to the Police Commission upon request. D) Review the City Council' s proposed budget advise whether budgetary allocations for the Police Department are aligned with the Police Department' s policies and procedures. The Police Commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on the Police Department budget per budget cycle and shall forward to the City Council any recommendations for change. E) Require the Chief of Police to submit an annual report to the Police Commission regarding such matters as the Police Commission shall require. F) Report at least once a year to the Mayor, the City Council, and to the public to the extent permissible by law, the information contained in the Chiefs report in addition to such other matters as are relevant to the functions and duties of the Police Commission. Ordinance No. 2212- C- S Page 6 May 24, 2022  G) Receive reports from the Police Department on publicly disclosable information concerning the status of civilian complaints. Develop a program for the mediation of civilian complaints, in coordination with the Chief of Police, the City Manager, and the City Attorney. H) Study, develop, and recommend community policing and alternative crime- prevention policies and strategies to the Chief of Police, City Manager, City Attorney, and City Council; assess and make recommendations regarding the role of social services in public including but not limited to those related to mental safety, health, alcohol and substance abuse, homelessness, juvenile justice, and education. I)Develop and recommend, in conjunction with the Chief of Police and the City Manager, educational programs regarding policing in Antioch and community outreach events, such as town hall meetings, forums to communicate information about neighborhood watch programs, and events designed to encourage safety and emergency preparedness. J) Request and review data from public records of the Antioch Police Department as needed to effectuate the Police Commission' s powers and duties including data regarding police use of force; demographics of individuals stopped, searched, or arrested; demographics of Antioch Police Department officers and staff; and officer training and qualifications. 4- 3. 111 PUBLIC REPORTS. A) The Police Commission shall draft and issue public reports regarding the issues described in section 4- 3. 100. An annual report may be in the form of an update from a previous year's report. The Police Commission may issue additional public reports as it deems appropriate. B) The Police Commission shall provide annual public reports to City Council, City Manager, and City Attorney on the Police Department' s progress on Police Commission recommendations and other updates relevant to the mission of the Police Commission. C) All public reports shall omit or redact any confidential or privileged information as defined by State law. SECTION 4. CEQA. The adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (" CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061( b)( 3), which provides that CEQA only applies to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be determined that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, the project is not subject to CEQA. This Ordinance authorizes the City Council to create an Antioch Police Ordinance No. 2212- C- S Page 7 May 24, 2022  Oversight Commission and does not propose nor authorize any action or specific project that would have the potential to cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. SECTION 5. Severability. Should any provision of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable, or otherwise void, that determination shall have no effect on any other provision of this Ordinance or the application of this Ordinance to any other person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. SECTION 6. Publication; Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced within thirty ( 30) days from and after the date of its adoption by the City Council at a second reading and shall be posted and published in accordance with the California Government Code. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Antioch held on the 10th day of May, 2022 and passed and adopted at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of May, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members District 1 Torres- Walker, District 4 Wilson, and Mayor Thorpe NOES: Council Member District 3 Ogorchock ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tern ( District 2) BarbanIca 0 .PI LAMAR A. THORPE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH ATTEST: t• 11-4/—) / lAh— ELIZABETH HOUSEHOLDER 1.-, f',& 32--- 1• CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANTIOCH Ordinance No. 2212- C- S Page 8 May 24; 2022  ATTACHMENT B ANTIOCH POLICE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (APOC) ORDINANCE  INTRODUCTION This presentation offers background on the formation of the APOC and highlights staff’s proposed amendments to the ordinance for discussion. It also requests input from the Commission and invites any additional changes members may want to suggest. Only the City Council has the authority to approve changes to the ordinance, and all input and discussion from this meeting will be part of a presentation to the City Council for review at a later date.  BACKGROUND In 2020, the City Council directed staff to research and recommend the establishment of a civilian oversight body for the Antioch Police Department. This led to the adoption of Ordinance No. 2212-C-S in 2022, which established the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. The commission held its first meeting on March 18, 2024.  PURPOSE The purpose of the Police Commission is to advise the City Council, City Manager, and Chief of Police on the administration of the Antioch Police Department and on matters of public safety within the City of Antioch to ensure that the Antioch Police Department's policies, practices, and customs conform to national standards of constitutional policing. The Police Commission shall facilitate community participation and oversight by reviewing and recommending policies, procedures, practices, and programs designed to result in community policing that is effective, responsive, and sensitive to the diverse needs of the residents of the City.  PURPOSE CONTINUED The Police Commission shall promote and encourage open communication and cooperation between the Antioch Police Department and residents of the City, recognizing that policing the City of Antioch is a shared responsibility. The Police Commission shall develop, review, and make policy recommendations aimed at informing the community of its rights and responsibilities when interacting with police officers.  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.103 MEMBERSHIP AND APPOINTMENT (A) – add according to Municipal Code 2-5.201, and that the Chair, Mayor, and City Manager shall interview The applicants make a recommendation to the City Council 2-5.201 Add a background process Applicants aged 18 and older must complete the same background checks and fingerprinting required of city employees as a condition of appointment. This includes information from personal interviews and social media reviews, which will be considered during the selection process. Once appointed, members will be sworn in by the City Clerk or an authorized member of the Clerk’s Office.  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.103 MEMBERSHIP AND APPOINTMENT Edit: (C) – The Mayor and City Council shall strive to appoint and confirm members to the Commission with the intent of ensuring meaningful representation from individuals with diverse backgrounds and perspectives. While not required to include representation from each category listed below, and recognizing that some individuals may reflect more than one category, the following are important Factors to consider when making appointments: (E) Delete subsections (a), (c), and (d) 2-5.201  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.104 TERMS OF OFFICE AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE Edit: (D) – Add the City Manager, Mayor, or any member of the City Council has the authority to make the recommendation. (d) – Change to violation of the APOC Rules of Decorum and conduct policy. Refer to the draft of this policy.  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.106 MEETINGS Edit: (A) – Change to at least once each month and delete July and December language.  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.108 BUDGET Edit: Include a sentence that the funding will be incorporated into the City Manager’s budget, with the specific allocation amount determined during each budget cycle.  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.109 TRAINING Edit: Add a requirement that each Commissioner complete a police ride-along within the first 30 days of appointment and participate in at least two ride-alongs annually. Additionally, Commissioners must complete use-of-force simulator training within 90 days of appointment and annually thereafter. Commissioners are also required to complete all training outlined in the APOC Training Plan. Add a requirement that all training requests requiring city funding must be pre-authorized by the City Manager.ntments  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.110 POWERS AND DUTIES Policies under APOC’s authority include those related to: • First Amendment assemblies • Use of force • Deployment of canines • De-escalation techniques involving civilians • Response to hate crimes • Biased-based policing, including profiling based on any protected characteristic as defined by federal, state, or local law No changes to this  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.110 POWERS AND DUTIES Edit: Work with the City Attorney to clarify the process for recommending changes to the specified policies. If APOC and the department agrees on the proposed changes, the Police Chief shall amend the policy accordingly. If APOC and the Department disagree, the proposed changes shall be forwarded to the City Council for final approval or rejection. Nothing in this section restricts the City Council from independently initiating or inquiring about policy changes outside the scope of APOC's authority.  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS 4-3.110 POWERS AND DUTIES (D) – Discussion of the requirement for APOC to review the proposed budget and conduct at least one public hearing.  SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS ADDITION Temporary pause of APOC The City Council has the authority to temporarily pause APOC. Such action may only be approved by a majority vote of the City Council and will be based on factors including, but not limited to, the Commission’s effectiveness, compliance with legal obligations, budget constraints, or shifts in city priorities. The temporary suspension cannot exceed three months within a rolling 12-month period. APOC does not have the authority to pause, without City Council Authorization.  COMMISSIONER SUGGESTIONS Commissioners are encouraged to offer additional suggestions to enhance the effectiveness and fulfill the purpose of APOC QUESTIONS  ATTACHMENT C Rules of Decorum and Conduct Policy Antioch Police Oversight Commission Purpose These rules aim to set clear guidelines for the Antioch Police Oversight Commission (APOC) to improve transparency, accountability, and public trust between law enforcement and the Antioch community. They ensure meetings are orderly, conduct is ethical, public participation is encouraged, and legal requirements are met under the oversight of the Antioch City Council, which has full authority over appointments and removals. 1. General Provisions 1.1 Applicability: These rules apply to Commission members, City staff, and members of the public during all meetings, hearings, and APOC-related activities. 1.2 Legal Compliance: The Commission operates in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, the California Public Records Act, the Political Reform Act, and all applicable federal, state, and local laws. 1.3 Oversight Authority: The Antioch City Council appoints and may remove Commission members at its sole discretion, with or without cause. 1.4 Purpose and Scope: The Commission acts in an advisory capacity, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. [insert number], with responsibilities that include making recommendations, hosting public forums, and reviewing systemic police practices. 2. Conduct of Commissioners 2.1 Civility and Integrity: Commissioners must treat each other, City staff, and the public with professionalism, respect, and fairness. 2.2 Preparedness and Attendance: Commissioners are expected to attend all meetings, review materials in advance, and actively participate in discussions. 2.3 Conflict of Interest and Transparency: Commissioners must complete and submit Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700) and recuse themselves when a financial or personal conflict exists. 2.4 Confidentiality: Commissioners must protect privileged or confidential information and not disclose it unless authorized by the City Attorney or compelled by law. 2.5 Social Media and Public Statements: Commissioners shall not use social media or other platforms to undermine the City or Commission’s work, retaliate, or disparage individuals or the City. 2.6 Accountability: Commissioners may be removed by the City Council for excessive absences, violations of law or policy, or conduct that undermines the integrity or effectiveness of the Commission. 2.7 Attendance and Unexcused Absences: • Commissioners are expected to attend all regularly scheduled and special meetings of the Antioch Police Oversight Commission. • An unexcused absence is defined as any absence from a meeting where the Commissioner fails to provide prior written or verbal notice to the Chair, Vice  Chair, or designated City staff at least 24 hours in advance, and the absence is not due to one of the following reasons: o Personal illness or medical emergency. o Death or serious illness in the immediate family. o Required court appearance, military duty, or legal obligation. o Work-related conflict that cannot be rescheduled. o Other emergencies or circumstances deemed reasonable by the Chair or Vice Chair. • Absences for vacations, discretionary travel, or avoidable scheduling conflicts shall not be considered excused unless the Chair or Vice Chair grants prior approval in consultation with the City Manager. • If a Commissioner has three or more unexcused absences within any rolling 12- month period, the City Manager shall notify the City Council and include the matter on a future agenda for discussion and possible removal of the Commissioner, as authorized by the Council. • If a Commissioner has three or more excused absences within any rolling 12- month period, the Chair, City Manager, and City Attorney will meet with the Commissioner to determine if the commissioner has the bandwidth to actively participate on the commission. • All absences, excused and unexcused, shall be documented in the meeting minutes and tracked by City staff for transparency and accountability. 3. Roles and Responsibilities of Leadership 3.1 Chair Responsibilities: • Preside over meetings and maintain order. • Ensure adherence to the agenda and time limits. • Facilitate respectful and inclusive dialogue. • Represent the Commission in official communications. 3.2 Vice Chair Responsibilities: • Fulfill the Chair’s responsibilities in their absence. 3.3 Leadership Elections: • The Commission shall annually elect a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members. 4. Conduct of Public Participants 4.1 Respectful Participation: All public comments must be respectful. Personal attacks, profanity, and disruptive behavior are prohibited. 4.2 Public Comment Procedures: • To assist in facilitating public comment, speaker cards are available and encouraged, but not required. Anyone wishing to speak is welcome to do so when called upon or at the designated time. • Public comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes, unless otherwise adjusted by the Chair. 4.3 Enforcement: The Chair may issue warnings and, if necessary, remove disruptive participants in accordance with the Brown Act and case law (e.g., Acosta v. City of Costa Mesa). 5. Meeting Procedures 5.1 Agenda Preparation and Posting: Agendas shall be prepared in coordination with the Chair and posted at least 72 hours in advance of regular meetings. 5.2 Quorum and Voting: • A quorum (majority of seated members) is required to conduct official business. • Actions require a majority vote of the members present. 5.3 Open Meetings: All meetings are open to the public unless lawfully held in closed session. 6. Training and Education 6.1 Mandatory Training: • Commissioners must complete ethics training (AB 1234), sexual harassment prevention training (AB 1661), and Brown Act training within six (6) months of appointment. 6.2 Continuing Education: Commissioners are encouraged to attend relevant workshops, seminars, and community events focused on civilian oversight, bias reduction, and procedural justice. 7. Accountability and Transparency 7.1 Council Oversight: • The City Council evaluates the performance of the Commission and its members and may amend its structure or authority as needed. • The Commission shall submit an annual report to the City Council summarizing activities, findings, and recommendations. 7.2 Public Records and Access: • All agendas, minutes, and official records will be publicly available in compliance with the Brown Act and Public Records Act. 8. Community Engagement 8.1 Community Roundtables: • The Commission shall host at least one public roundtable annually to gather community input and foster trust. 8.2 Ad Hoc and subcommittees: • The Commission may create issue-specific Ad Hoc or subcommittees, following applicable legal requirements. 9. Amendments and Review 9.1 Annual Review: These rules shall be reviewed by the City Council annually and updated as needed. 9.2 Amendment Authority: All amendments require approval by the City Council.