Civil Service
Regular MeetingBattle Creek, MI · November 22, 2021
Minutes
Official Proceedings of the Battle Creek Civil Service Commission
City Hall
10 N. Division Street
Via Zoom, Enterprise Video Conferencing
Battle Creek, Michigan
November 22, 2021
4:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Chris Dopp, Michael Roller and Tim Martinovich, all
attending remotely from the City of Battle Creek.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT: Clerk Victoria Houser, Fire Chief Brian Sturdivant, Battalion Chief Michelle
Hughey, Human Resource Director Michelle Hull, Fire Fighter Jeremy Pratt
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Dopp called the meeting to order at 4:07 PM.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Chairperson Dopp noted the first order of business was to approve the September 22, 2021 Civil
Service Commission minutes.
Comm. Martinovich, supported by Comm. Roller, made a motion to approve the Civil Service
Commission meeting minutes of September 22, 2021, as amended, to note Comm. Roller’s
attendance remotely, via phone service. All in favor, none opposed. Motion approved.
PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS: There were no petitions or communications.
REPORTS: There were no reports.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: There was none.
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Civil Service Rule Amendments
Nancy Mullett, Labor Relations Attorney, discussed the proposed amendments to the Civil Service
Rules. Attorney Mullett noted that after review of Public Act 78 of 1935, proposed amendments to
the rules, particularly Rules 3 and 4, were being recommended as to the hiring process of and the
role of the new position of Deputy Fire Chief.
Attorney Mullett, noting the Deputy Chief position was a high-level position, reviewed the flexibility
of the Civil Service Commission to determine the requirements to fill this position. Attorney Mullett
stated the amendments were to determine what an examination would look like, stating a written
exam is not needed for each positon. As an example, Attorney Mullett stated the City of Troy
simply conducts interviews for promotions, stating there is no written exam or assessment center
conducted, noting this type of discretion is contained in Public Act 78.
Attorney Mullett noted the only change to Rule 3 was to eliminate the word “written” before
examination, stating that an examination could be an interview, and all questions would be at the
discretion of the Civil Service Commission, stating the interview could be conducted by a company,
the fire department staff or the human resources staff, or a panel of all three.
Attorney Mullett stated all changes to Rule 4 are based on the language of the statute, stating there
was no paragraph designated to promotions, stating the new Paragraph #1 is the authority the Public
Act provides the Commission, with the exception of the last sentence. Attorney Mullett noted the
last sentence allows the Commission to approve all job descriptions that contain qualifications not
1
otherwise required by the Act, before the position is posted. Attorney Mullett noted that although an
interested candidate may have sufficient years to be able to participate in a promotional examination,
they may not have the qualifications for the position. Attorney Mullett noted the Civil Service
Commission, as the independent decision maker, would also need to consider if the qualifications for
the Deputy Chief position are reasonable, otherwise it would be an independent action by the Fire
Chief, the HR Director, or a combination of both.
Attorney Mullett noted the following additional changes:
Rule 4, Paragraph #2, previously Paragraph #1, updated to provide some flexibility, stating there
could be an examination by assessment center or not, removing the narrow language that it must be
done by an assessment center.
Rule 4, Paragraph #3: Time in lower grade, the insertion of Deputy Chief, and the next lower grade,
Battalion Chief, noting the law provides a distinction.
Rule 4, Paragraph #4 to remove “Assessment Center” and add “examination,” which may or may not
include an assessment center.
Rule 4, Paragraph #5 to clean up the language regarding yearly evaluations to be reviewed by one
other command staff.
Rule 4, Paragraph #7, amended various ways to get to 100%, including an option for only oral
interview and removing the word “written.”
Rule #5, Paragraph #2, examination questions to be approved by the Civil Service Commission.
Rule #6, Paragraph #2 to add Deputy Chief to the exception for maintenance of Eligibility lists.
Attorney Mullett stated the proposed amendments are to bring the rules closer to what the Public Act
represents, stating something just got stuck in old language.
Comm. Roller expressed concern the changes were significant and there had not been any prior
discussion or review time, stating he did not feel comfortable making a motion on the changes until
he had a better understanding as to why the changes were being proposed and what the desired
results were to be. Comm. Roller stated he has several questions and would like to speak with others
prior to making a decision.
Comm. Martinovich expressed agreement, stating he would also like additional time to review the
proposed amendments and to get a better understanding.
A motion was made by Comm. Roller, supported by Comm. Martinovich, to postpone a decision on
the rule amendments to a future meeting. All in favor, none opposed. Motion approved.
2. Deputy Fire Chief
Michelle Hull, Human Resources Director, presented a summary memo regarding the proposed
Deputy Fire Chief position, along with the job description and a table of comparable requirements
from other municipalities. Ms. Hull noted the city is beginning a recruitment process, in conjunction
with Chief Sturdivant, to hire a deputy fire chief. Ms. Hull stated the documents established the
deputy fire chief qualifications, stating these are similar to the qualifications of other municipal
organizations, stating these will assist the city with succession planning. Ms. Hull also noted the
chart of comparable municipalities included cities that follow Public Act 78, noting some have
deputy chief positions, while others do not. Ms. Hull stated she added specific certification and
qualifications that are preferred, not required.
2
After confirming Ms. Hull was only requesting a vote on the deputy chief qualifications, a motion
was made by Comm. Roller, supported by Comm. Martinovich, to accept the qualifications, as
presented, for the Deputy Fire Chief position. All in favor, none opposed. Motion approved.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Jeremy Pratt, BCFD Fire Fighter, Local 335, commented on the proposed changes to the local rules,
stating his opinion the written test is important for entry-level candidates, stating a written test ensures the
entire process is objective and unbiased. Mr. Pratt, referring to Rule 4, expressed understanding that
Attorney Mullett was trying to give some leeway in the promotion of a deputy chief, however stating
Rule 4 applies to all promotional positions, including Battalion Chief, Captain, Lieutenant, Fire Marshal
and Training Officer. Mr. Pratt expressed his opinion that the proposed rules are extensive and get away
from the intention of PA 78, which was to eliminate the “good ole boy system.” Mr. Pratt stated the
current process, along with the public act, ensured the process is unbiased and objective, stating the
proposed changes were aligning with a one-person decision on who gets the positon.
Attorney Mullett expressed understanding of the concerns from the Commission and Mr. Pratt, stating the
proposed amendments to the language are actually statutory, not an interpretation. Attorney Mullett
stated the approval and authority to make the changes rests solely with the Civil Service Commission, not
with one person. Attorney Mullett noted the changes to Rules 3 & 4 ensures the Civil Service
Commission has final say on the scope of the examination, how subjective or objective the process is.
COMMISSION COMMENT:
Comm. Roller expressed concern with the proposed rule changes, stating he feels it bears scrutiny in the
hiring process, which under the current process keeps everything fair.
NEXT MEETING: December 27, 2021 at 4:00 PM.
ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Dopp adjourned the meeting at 4:34 PM.
3
Agenda
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2021
4:00 P.M.
BATTLE CREEK CITY HALL via ZOOM
Phone: 312-626-6799
Meeting ID: 870 6927 7843
BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. SEPTEMBER 27, 2021
C. PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
D. REPORTS
E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
F. NEW BUSINESS
1. Civil Service Rule Amendments
i. Rule 3: Filling Vacancies in the Rank of Firefighter and/or Other Entry-Level Positions
a) 1. Applications
b) 2. Date of Examination
c) 4. Content of Written Examinations
ii. Rule 4: Filling Vacancies above the Rank of Firefighter
a) 1. Promotion
b) 2. Vacancies
c) 3. Time in Lower Grade
d) 4 Interview/Oral Examination
e) 5. Yearly Evaluations
f) 7. Promotional Scores
iii. Rule 5: Examinations
a) 2. Review of Contents of Examination
iv. Rule 6: Eligibility Lists
a) 2. Maintenance of Eligibility Lists
b) 4. Ties; determination of position by lot: procedure
2. Deputy Fire Chief
i. Recruitment of Deputy Fire Chief and Authorization of Position Qualifications
ii. Deputy Fire Chief: Description of position
iii. Deputy Fire Chief: Table of Comparables
3. Civil Service Commission Discussion
G. PUBLIC COMMENTS
H. COMMISSION COMMENTS
I. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Battle Creek will provide necessary reasonable auxiliary aids and services, such as signers for the hearing impaired and audiotapes of
printed materials being considered in the meeting upon notice to the City of Battle Creek. Individuals with disabilities requiring auxiliary aids or
services should contact the City of Battle Creek by writing or calling the following:
Victoria L. Houser
Office of the City Clerk
P. O. Box 1717
Battle Creek, MI 49016
(269) 966-3348 (Voice/TDD)
Get email alerts for Battle Creek
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.