Planning Commission Agendas

AMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Monday, October 14, 2024 – 6:30 p.m. Howard L. Brown Public Safety Building – 1100 SW Smith Street Council Chambers The meeting can be viewed live only on Blue Springs Channel 7, City of Blue Springs, MO YouTube Channel and www.bluespringsgov.com/CityMeetingsLive 1 CALL TO ORDER – PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - CONSENT AGENDA a) MINUTES September 23, 2024 2 PUBLIC HEARING / REZONING / RZ-08-24-9287 / “The Links” / 29607 E R.D. Mize Rd (This item has been requested to be continued to the October 28, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting) Exhibits: 1. Staff Report with attachments 2. Applicant Plans with attachments 3. Affidavit of Publication in The Examiner on September 28, 2024 4. 185 ft. Notification Map 5. Names/addresses of property owners within 185 ft. of site 6. Copy of letter sent to said property owners 7. Title IV, Land Use Section – Blue Springs Code of Ordinances (by reference) 8. 2014 Comprehensive Plan (by reference) 3 PUBLIC HEARING / REZONING / RZ-08-24-9290 / BPOE Elks Lodge / 100 & 200 NE Brizendine Rd Exhibits: 1. Staff Report with attachments 2. Applicant Plans with attachments 3. Affidavit of Publication in The Examiner on September 28, 2024 4. 185 ft. Notification Map 5. property owners within 185 ft. of site 6. Copy of letter sent to said property owners 7. Title IV, Land Use Section – Blue Springs Code of Ordinances (by reference) 8. 2014 Comprehensive Plan (by reference) 4 PUBLIC HEARING / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN / PDC-08-24-9288 / “The Links” / 29607 E R.D. Mize Rd (This item has been requested to be continued to the October 28, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting) 10.14.2024 Page 1 of 3 TB  Exhibits: 1. Staff Report with attachments 2. Applicant Plans with attachments 3. Affidavit of Publication in The Examiner on September 28, 2024 4. 185 ft. Notification Map 5. Names/addresses of property owners within 185 ft. of site 6. Copy of letter sent to said property owners 7. Title IV, Land Use Section – Blue Springs Code of Ordinances (by reference) 8. 2014 Comprehensive Plan (by reference) 5 PUBLIC HEARING / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN / PDC-08-24-9291 / BPOE Elks Lodge / 100 & 200 Brizendine Rd Exhibits: 1. Staff Report with attachments 2. Applicant Plans with attachments 3. Affidavit of Publication in The Examiner on September 28, 2024 4. 185 ft. Notification Map 5. property owners within 185 ft. of site 6. Copy of letter sent to said property owners 7. Title IV, Land Use Section – Blue Springs Code of Ordinances (by reference) 8. 2014 Comprehensive Plan (by reference) 6 PUBLIC HEARING / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / CUP-08-24-9283 / Home Depot / 905 NE Adams Dairy Parkway (This item has been requested to be continued to the November 12, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting) Exhibits: 1. Staff Report with attachments 2. Applicant Plans with attachments 3. Affidavit of Publication in The Examiner on September 28, 2024 4. 185 ft. Notification Map 5. property owners within 185 ft. of site 6. Copy of letter sent to said property owners 7. Title IV, Land Use Section – Blue Springs Code of Ordinances (by reference) 8. 2014 Comprehensive Plan (by reference) 7 SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW / SPDR-08-24-9284 / Home Depot / 905 NE Adams Dairy Parkway (This item has been requested to be continued to the November 12, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting) 8 MASTER/ALTERNATIVE SIGN / ASP-08-24-9285 / Life Unlimited / 3500 NW South Outer Rd 9 PRELIMINARY PLAT / PP-08-24-9289 / “The Links” / 29607 E R.D. Mize Rd (This item has been requested to be continued to the October 28, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER MONTHLY REPORT 11 ADJOURN The next meeting will be Monday, October 28, 2024 If special accommodations are required for citizen participation in this meeting, PLEASE CALL 816-228-0207 (VOICE) OR 816-228-0250 (TDD) 10.14.2024 Page 2 of 3 TB  Agenda posted at the following locations: City Hall, 903 W. Main Street City’s website http://www.bluespringsgov.com/AgendaCenter October 9, 2024 A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance however no City Council votes will be taken. Public Hearing Comments: If you would like to make a public comment during a public hearing, we request that you submit a Speaker Appearance Form prior to 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. There will be hard copies of the Speaker Appearance Form located at the entrance of the Multipurpose Room. After completion, the form is to be given to Recording Secretary, prior to the start of the meeting. The Chairperson will call upon you by announcing your First and Last Name. You will be sworn in by a Public Stenographer and asked to state your full name and address for the record before giving your testimony. Mike Mallon, Director of Community Development 10.14.2024 Page 3 of 3 TB  City of Blue Springs 903 Main Blue Springs, Missouri 64015 Planning Commission MINUTES Monday, September 23, 2024 Media Link: September 23, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Blue Springs was held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, September 23, 2024, in the Council Chambers of the Howard L. Brown Public Safety Building, located at 1100 SW Smith Street, Blue Springs. The meeting was also viewed live on Blue Springs Channel 7, City of Blue Springs, Mo YouTube Channel, and www.bluespringsgov.com/CityMeetingsLive. The following members, guests and staff were in attendance: ATTENDANCE Chris Henning, Chairperson Brian Ingersoll Richard How, Vice Chairperson Byron Craddolph Susan Stokenbury Jennifer Ritschel-Smith Jared Pumphrey Chad Sanderson STAFF PRESENT Mike Mallon, Senior Director of City Development Dave McCumber, Development Review Manager Shantele Frie, Associate Planner Adam Hilgedick, Assistant Director of Public Works ________________, City Attorney Susan Culpepper, Councilmember, District 1, Mayor Pro Tempore Traci Breshears, Recording Secretary ABSENT Travis Graham CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Chris Henning, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with a request that everyone stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Chairperson Henning requested action on the Consent Agenda. APPROVAL Commissioner Stokenbury made a motion to approve the minutes that was seconded by Commissioner Pumphrey. With 8-0 approval the minutes passed. PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 1 of 10  Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifer Ritschel-Smith—Aye PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Henning opened the public hearing for Ironwood at 6:32p. AGENDA ITEM 2 / Chairperson Henning requested Dave McCumber, Development Review PUBLIC HEARING / Manager, present the request for Rezoning / RZ-09-24-9256, Planned REZONING / RZ-09- Development Concept Plan / PDC-09-24-9257 and Preliminary Plat / PP-09-24- 24-9256 / “Ironwood” / 9258 for Ironwood to Planning Commission. North and South of 40 Hwy and East of Adams Pointe Golf Club & AGENDA ITEM 3 / PUBLIC HEARING / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN / PDC-09-24-9257 / “Ironwood” / North and South of 40 Hwy and East of Adams Pointe Golf Club & AGENDA ITEM 5 / PRELIMINARY PLAT / PP-09-24- 9258 / “Ironwood” / North and South of 40 Hwy and East of Adams Pointe Golf Club QUESTIONS Commissioner Craddolph asked about the C2 area plan. Mr. McCumber explained that the plan for the space in the Comprehensive Plan is for small-scale multi-family (duplexes, triplexes and four-plexes). PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 2 of 10  Commissioner Ingersoll asked which phase of the project they were going to add the turn lanes into the neighborhood. Adam Hilgedick, Assistant Director of Public Works, stated that the infrastructure needed will be placed with the proper phase. Commissioner Ingersoll stated that he is mostly concerned with traffic headed east-bound on 40 Hwy. Commissioner Sanderson asked what the housing classes in Adams Pointe are versus the Ironwood development. Mr. McCumber stated the Adams Pointe neighborhood homes are class A and class, and the Ironwood development will have class C and D abutting the Adams Pointe development. APPLICANT Shawn Woods, Ashlar Homes, 2800 NW Hunter Dr, Blue Springs, presented on his project. DISCUSSION Commissioner Craddolph asked where the gathering place will be in the development. Mr. Woods should the commission that it would be centrally located off Pavilion Drive. Commissioner Craddolph asked who would have access to the space. Mr. Woods stated that anyone within the community would have access. Commissioner Craddolph asked for elaboration on not being able to rent within the neighborhood. Mr. Woods stated that no one will be able to purchase more than one unit, and that there will be provisions to restrict renting for 5-6 years. Mike Mallon, Senior Director of City Development, added that the duplexes will be a different product from those in the city as each duplex unit will be broken up into individual lots. PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Henning closed the public hearing at 7:10p. CLOSED MOTION / PUBLIC Commissioner Sanderson made the motion to approve Rezoning / RZ-09-24-9256 HEARING / for Ironwood REZONING / RZ-09- 24-9256 / “Ironwood” / North and South of 40 Hwy and East of Adams Pointe Golf Club SECOND The motion was seconded by Commissioner Pumphrey VOTE Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifeer Ritschel-Smith—Aye RECOMMEND APPROVAL PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 3 of 10  (8-Aye, 0-No) MOTION / PUBLIC Commissioner Sanderson made a motion to approve the Planned Development HEARING / Concept Plan / PDC-09-24-9257 for Ironwood. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN / PDC-09-24-9257 / “Ironwood” / North and South of 40 Hwy and East of Adams Pointe Golf Club SECOND Commissioner Ingersoll seconded the motion. VOTE Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifeer Ritschel-Smith—Aye RECOMMEND APPROVAL with 4 conditions (8-Aye, 0-No) STAFF 1. Approval based on the representations of any drawings presented as CONDITIONS part of this application does not waive any requirement or development standard contained in the UDC, unless modified by the Planned Development. 2. The PD and Building Type Standards shall regulate the allowable Building Types for the subdivision. Any standards not specifically outlined in the Concept Plan shall be regulated by the standards of the base zoning district or most similar building type. 3. A 5-ft. wide ADA compliant sidewalk must be denoted on both sides of all streets in the PD Final Plan. 4. A PD Final Plan and a Final Plat of each phase will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. MOTION / Commissioner Sanderson made a motion to approve Preliminary Plat / PP-09-24- PRELIMINARY 9258 for Ironwood. PLAT / PP-09-24- 9258 / “Ironwood” / North and South of 40 Hwy and East of Adams Pointe Golf Club PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 4 of 10 SECOND Commissioner Ingersoll seconded the motion. VOTE Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifeer Ritschel-Smith—Aye APPROVED with 6 conditions (8-Aye, 0-No) STAFF 1. Approval by the Planning Commission based on the representations of CONDITIONS any drawings presented as part of this application does not waive any requirement or development standard contained in the UDC, unless modified by the Planned Development. 2. Prior to approval of each Final Plat, the following must occur: a. A Planned Development Final Plan must be completed to ensure landscaping and buffering complies with the UDC. b. All open spaces amenities, landscaping, and buffers must be installed or financially guaranteed prior to approval of each Final Plat. i. If financially guaranteed, all open space amenities, landscaping, and buffers must be installed prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy for Phase Three (3). c. Drafts of the proposed Declaration of Restrictions and the Homes Association Declaration documents shall be submitted to the City. The Declarations shall address the maintenance of all open space tracts and amenities and the minimum livable floor area classification. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following must occur: a. An approved Final Plat must be recorded at Jackson County. b. The Declarations of Restrictions and the Homes Association Declaration documents shall be recorded. 4. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following must occur: a. All required landscaping (45 plant units) and street tree(s) shall be installed or financially guaranteed. b. Sidewalks adjacent to lot frontages are required to be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Tree Preservation Easements shall be shown and dedicated on the Final Plats for each Phase. 6. The minimum livable floor area classification must be noted on each Final Plat. PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 5 of 10 PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Henning opened the public hearing at 7:11p. OPENING AGENDA ITEM 4 / Chairperson Henning requested Chris Willis, Associate Planner, present the PUBLIC HEARING / request for Conditional Use Permit / CUP-08-24-9259 for PS Property Services CONDITIONAL USE to Planning Commission. PERMIT / CUP-08- 24-9259 / “PS Property Services” / 309-315 NW 10th St QUESTIONS None. APPLICANT Stacey Heath, 309-311 NW 10th St, Blue Springs, stated she was there to answer any questions. DISCUSSION None. PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Henning closed the public hearing at 7:15p. CLOSED MOTION / PUBLIC Commissioner Stokenbury made a motion to approve Conditional Use Permit / HEARING / CUP-08-24-9259 for PS Property Services CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / CUP-08- 24-9259 / “PS Property Services” / 309-315 NW 10th St SECOND Commissioner Ingersoll seconded the motion. VOTE Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifeer Ritschel-Smith—Aye RECOMMEND APPROVAL with 4 conditions (8-Aye, 0-No) PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 6 of 10 STAFF 1. Approval based on the representations of any drawings presented as part CONDITIONS of this application does not waive any requirements or development standard contained in the UDC unless otherwise specified by the Alternative Development Standards. 2. The Conditional Use Permit allows the “Construction or Building Contractor (With Machinery, Equipment, Or Storage)” land use to be allowed at the property addressed 309-315 NW 10th Street. 3. Staff recommends that the requested deviation from Section 405.050 be approved to allow the existing overhead doors on the building, which do front an arterial or collector street. 4. Staff recommends that the requested deviation from Section 405.050 be approved to allow company vehicles to be parked overnight in the approved parking spaces on the property. Given the property is already developed, the only feasible parking area is provided along the street frontage, an exception should be made for this request to accommodate the contractor business. AGENDA ITEM 6 / Chairperson Henning requested Mr. McCumber, present the request for PRELIMINARY Preliminary Plat / PP-08-24-9261, Final Plat / PF-08-24-9262 and Site Plan PLAT / PP-08-24- Design Review / SPDR-08-24-9261 for Bump City to Planning Commission. 9261 / “Bump City” / 1001 NW Jefferson St & AGENDA ITEM 7 / FINAL PLAT / PF- 08-24-9262 / “Bump City” / 1001 NW Jefferson St & AGENDA ITEM 8 / SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW / SPDR-08- 24-9260 / “Bump City” / 1001 NW Jefferson St QUESTIONS None. APPLICANT Shawn Caton, 6320 Marion Ave, Kansas City presented his application to the commissioners. PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 7 of 10 DISCUSSION None. MOTION / Commissioner How motioned to approve Preliminary Plat / PP-08-24-9261 for PRELIMINARY Bump City PLAT / PP-08-24- 9261 / “Bump City” / 1001 NW Jefferson St SECOND Commissioner Ingersoll seconded the motion. VOTE Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifeer Ritschel-Smith—Aye APPROVED with 1 condition (8-Aye, 0-No) STAFF 1. Approval by the Planning Commission based on the CONDITIONS representations of any drawings presented as part of this application does not waive any requirement or development standard contained in the UDC. MOTION / FINAL Commissioner How motioned to approve the Final Plat / PF-08-24-9262 for PLAT / PF-08-24- Bump City. 9262 / “Bump City” / 1001 NW Jefferson St SECOND Commissioner Ingersoll seconded the motion. VOTE Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifeer Ritschel-Smith—Aye RECOMMEND APPROVAL with 3 conditions (8-Aye, 0-No) PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 8 of 10 STAFF 1. Approval by the Planning Commission based on the CONDITIONS representations of any drawings presented as part of this application does not waive any requirement or development standard contained in the UDC. 2. An access easement shall be provided from both entrances on NW Jefferson Street and span across the drive aisle, which runs from the west to east side of the property. The easement will allow for adequate traffic circulation for the future if the lots are split and sold to separate owners. 3. The Final Plat must be approved and recorded with Jackson County prior to the issuance of any building permits within the development. MOTION / SITE Commissioner How motioned to approve Site Plan Design Review / SPDR-08- PLAN DESIGN 24-9260 for Bump City. REVIEW / SPDR-08- 24-9260 / “Bump City” / 1001 NW Jefferson St SECOND Commissioner Ingersoll seconded the motion. VOTE Susan Stokenbury—Aye Chad Sanderson—Aye Byron Craddolph—Aye Brian Ingersoll—Aye Richard How—Aye Chris Henning—Aye Jared Pumphrey—Aye Jennifeer Ritschel-Smith—Aye APPROVED with 1 condition (8-Aye, 0-No) STAFF 1. Approval by the City Council based on the representations of CONDITIONS any drawings presented as part of this application does not waive any requirement or development standard contained in the UDC. ANNOUNCEMENTS None. PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 9 of 10 MEETING Chairperson Henning asked for a motion for adjournment. Commissioner ADJOURN Stokenbury motioned to adjourn, which was seconded by Commissioner Pumphrey, and with unanimous consent the meeting was adjourned at 7:23 pm. ___________________________________ Respectfully Submitted by Traci Breshears, Recording Secretary ________________________________ Chris Henning, Chairperson __________________________________ Date PC Minutes 9.23.2024 TB Page 10 of 10 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT Meeting Dates: Planning Commission: October 14, 2024 City Council: October 21, 2024 Project Name: BPOE Elks Site Location: 200 NE Brizendine Rd Project Request: RZ-08-24-9290; Rezoning from “RE” (Residential Estate) to “PD” (Planned Development) PDC-08-24-9291; PD Concept Plan to allow for the existing private club, accessory residential dwelling, and accessory recreational vehicle parking land uses, and all permitted uses within the “SO” (Service Office) zoning district. Applicant: Dana Duckworth Property Owner: Dana Duckworth Staff Planner: Christopher Willis, Associate Planner Project Description: The applicant is requesting to rezone 3.84 +/- acres of property from “RE” (Residential Estate) to “PD” (Planned Development) and approval of a Planned Development Concept Plan (PDC) to allow for the private club use of an existing barn, accessory residential dwelling, accessory recreational vehicle parking for members only, and all permitted uses within the “SO” (Service Office) zoning district. The property is located within the (Adams Dairy Parkway-Overlay) (“ADP- O”) district. The proposed rezoning request is only to change the base zoning from “RE” to “PD”. The “ADP-O” will remain and will not be affected by the change in base zoning. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning and approval of the PD Concept Plan with conditions identified at the end of the staff report. Previous Actions: Date Review Body Action 05/13/2002 Planning Recommended approval to Ordinance Commission Amendment (OA-1-2002) to amend the CZ-1 Adams Dairy Parkway Corridor Overlay District to include specific property that is being annexed to the corporate boundary of the City of Blue Springs. The additional ground will increase the boundary of the Parkway Overlay District by 33.18 +/- acres in the area just south and west of Brizendine Road. 05/20/2002 City Council Approved the Ordinance Amendment (OA-1- 2002) to amend the CZ-1 Adams Dairy Parkway Corridor Overlay District to include specific property that is being annexed to the corporate boundary of the City of Blue Springs. The additional ground will increase the boundary of the Parkway Overlay District by 33.18 +/- acres in the area just south and west of Brizendine Road. Rezoning and Planned Development Page 1 of 8 Concept Plan RZ-08-24-9290; PDC-08-24-9291 Elks Lodge BPOE Exhibit #1  Project: Elks Lodge BPOE Plan Case: RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC-08-24-9291 Future Applications: No additional applications are anticipated. The property is currently developed and there are no additional site improvements proposed for the site at this time. Building permits will be required for the upgrade of RV electrical hookups on site. Adjacent Properties: Direction Current Zoning Current Land Use(s) North: “RE”(Residential Estate) Agricultural Homesite South: “SO” (Service Office) Private Club East: “RE”(Residential Estate) Vacant Residential Land West: “AG”(Agricultural)& Golf Course & Recreation and entertainment Unincorporated Land outdoor. REZONING ANALYSIS Existing Zoning: “RE” (Residential Estate) Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence Proposed Zoning: “PD” (Planned Development) Proposed Land Use: Private club, accessory residential dwelling, accessory recreational vehicle parking, and all permitted uses within the “SO” (Service Office) zoning district. Comprehensive Plan: According to the 2014 Comprehensive Plan, “the Future Land Use Policy Map reflects planned future land uses at the most generalized and city-wide scale. The intent of the Future Land Use Policy Map is not to predetermine land uses or zoning on a specific parcel or at specific locations. Together with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Policy Map should be used to guide the relationships and physical improvements needed to create the types of places that are part of Blue Springs’ long- range vision.” The Future Land Use Policy Map designates the subject property as “Distinct Destination,” which is defined as a mix of larger-scale and regionally significant land uses that are different from other places in Blue Springs and the region. These areas may include a mix of retail, service/entertainment, office, institutional/civic or light industrial land uses, but a unique land use policy for each area emphasizes different uses, patterns and characteristics that make the destinations distinct. The scale and intensity of development in these areas requires a supporting system of street networks, pedestrian circulation and civic/open spaces to strengthen the destination and created a defined focal point as a catalyst for development. According to the 2014 Comprehensive Plan, “Specific Plans” are detailed, area-specific perspectives of the patterns and coordination of the built and natural environment, and how these details contribute to unique places in Blue Springs. These plans offer a more refined and location-specific application of the Policies, Goals, and Targets of the General Plan to a particular context.” Page 2 of 8  Project: Elks Lodge BPOE Plan Case: RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC-08-24-9291 The subject property is part of the C2 Area Specific Plan, which was completed as part of the Comprehensive Plan in 2014. The C2 Area Plan most closely classifies the subject property as "Civic – Public/Semi-Public," which is defined as “Areas to accommodate public entities, private uses that serve a broader public interest or other facilities built and maintained for general public use.” Rezoning: The intent of the “PD” zoning district is defined in Section 404.260, as follows: There exist in the City parcels where the zoning regulations contained in the categorical districts listed in the UDC may not provide for the development of innovative projects desired by property owners and providing general benefit to the City as a whole. To allow for innovative development projects in a way that can assist in the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other development goals and objectives, a Planned Development (PD District) District is provided as a special zoning district that may be used in these instances. The intent of the PD District is to encourage unique and high-quality neighborhood, commercial or mixed-use development through an integrated development plan that provides flexibility to the standard zoning district regulations. The use of the PD District can enhance the quality of development and amenities, improve the design of the public realm, increase compatibility between adjacent uses and developments, and reduce negative impacts by using techniques such as: large-scale developments; efficient use of land; innovative and imaginative architectural approaches; design and site planning standards; conservation and preservation of natural resources; urban amenities; and greater open space. Through the PD, the development will allow for the private club use by right, an accessory residential dwelling, and house 8 existing accessory RV parking spaces. Additionally, “SO” (Service Office) permitted land uses will be allowed within the proposed PD zoning district. The Planned Development process is a way to facilitate the coordinated master planned development that meets or exceeds the intent of the UDC and the goals of the Comprehensive Plan through an integrated plan, process, and flexible standards. A Planned Development application is a specific type of Zoning Map amendment (rezoning) and must meet all the procedures and requirements of that process, but it also accommodates specific master development plans. Review Criteria: In reviewing any application for an amendment to the Official Zoning Map (zoning change / rezoning), the Planning Commission and City Council shall review the proposed amendment considering the Comprehensive Plan, the general requirements of the Unified Development Code, and the following considerations: 1. The application is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and any official plan or program developed under the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan, and in particular the relationship of land uses within the proposed district and the relationship with uses existing or anticipated in surrounding districts. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff believes the rezoning is in accordance with the 2014 Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning request will allow for the Elks Lodge to provide complementary uses to existing private club located on the property to the South, while being in harmony with the surrounding golf course located in the adjacent Agricultural and Residential Estate zoning districts. The Page 3 of 8  Project: Elks Lodge BPOE Plan Case: RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC-08-24-9291 proposed rezoning permits the Elks Lodge to expand their private club, recreational, and service amenities. 2. The application furthers the intent of the proposed zoning district and supports that of any abutting zoning districts. STAFF RESPONSE: The intent of the PD zoning district is to encourage innovative, unique, and high-quality developments which include mixed-use developments. The proposed project will accommodate three unique land uses, an existing Private Club, an accessory residential dwelling, and accessory recreational vehicle parking land use. Additionally, the “SO” Service Office land uses will be allowed as outlined in the UDC at the subject property. The subject property abuts the “SO” zoning district to the South and “RE” to the North and East. The proposed PD zoning district will be in alignment with surrounding uses such as residential, private club, golf course, and recreation and entertainment outdoor. 3. The precedents that might result from approval or denial of the application, and the possible effects of such precedents on the character of the area, and in particular the building form, site design, and other development patterns and urban design aspects that accompany precedents for the proposed district. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff believes the request to rezone to “PD” (Planned Development) would not set a precedent that is out of character for the surrounding area. 4. Compliance of any proposed development with the requirements of the UDC. STAFF RESPONSE: The subject property is already developed. Limited site modifications are being requested through the Planned Development. However, the applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing RV electrical hookups on the site. Asphalt millings are proposed to be added to the existing gravel parking area designated for RVs. If any new development is proposed in the future, UDC requirements will be required to be brought into conformance (landscape, buffering, sidewalks, etc.). 5. The ability of the City or other government agencies to provide any services, facilities or programs that might be required if the application were approved. STAFF RESPONSE: The site is existing, and no significant development is being proposed as part of the scope of this application. Staff does not believe that there would be any significant increase in the demand for services, facilities or programs. 6. The effect of approval on the condition or value of property in the City or in the vicinity, including the likelihood of surrounding areas to be developed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff believes approval of this rezoning will not negatively impact the condition or value of the property of surrounding areas. 7. The requested zoning change is justified by a change in conditions since the existing zoning was designated or by an error in the current designation. Page 4 of 8  Project: Elks Lodge BPOE Plan Case: RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC-08-24-9291 STAFF RESPONSE: The subject property is currently zoned “RE” (Residential Estate). The proposed private club and accessory recreational vehicle parking land uses are not allowed in the “RE” zoning. It’s worth mentioning that an accessory residential dwelling is allowed as a limited use. The property is being rezoned to “PD” (Planned Development), to allow for the existing private club, accessory residential dwelling, and accessory recreational vehicle parking land uses, and all permitted uses within the “SO” (Service Office) zoning district. The proposed zoning request is compatible with surrounding land uses such as the golf course, private club, and an agricultural homesite. 8. The consistency of the application with other adopted policies of the City. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff believes this proposal is consistent with other adopted City policies. 9. The recommendations of professional staff. STAFF RESPONSE: Based on the review criteria above, staff recommends approval of this rezoning request. PD CONCEPT PLAN ANALYSIS A concept plan or general development plan is a conceptual or generalized development plan for the entire area included either under the rezoning area or a previously approved concept plan area that requires an amendment. The purpose of a concept plan or general development plan is to allow preliminary review of a proposed development plan before substantial technical work has been undertaken. Planned Development Standards: As part of the PD Standards, the applicant is proposing the following:  The only land uses that will be permitted are the existing private club, accessory residential dwelling, and accessory recreational vehicle parking land uses, and all permitted uses within the “SO” (Service Office) zoning district. Land Use: The applicant’s PD Standards have specified proposed land uses. The proposed land uses of the property are “Private Club”, “Accessory Recreational Vehicle Parking”, and “Accessory Residential Dwelling” at 200 NE Brizendine Rd to utilize the existing barn as a private club, the existing residence as an accessory dwelling, and using a gravel/asphalt milling surface for recreational vehicle parking. If approved, the only land uses allowed on the subject property are the “SO” Service Office land uses outlined in the UDC, with the addition of “Club, Private”, “Accessory Residential Dwelling”, and “Accessory Recreational Vehicle Parking” land uses. Architectural Character: The current site has two existing buildings, a barn that will be utilized as part of the private club use and a single-family home that will be utilized as an accessory residential dwelling on the property. As stated, both structures are existing, and no interior or exterior remodels will made to either. Page 5 of 8  Project: Elks Lodge BPOE Plan Case: RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC-08-24-9291 Parking: The applicant is proposing to use gravel/ recycled asphalt millings as a parking surface for the accessory recreational vehicle parking. No more than 8 recreational vehicle (RV) parking spaces shall be allowed. RV parking shall only be available to Elk’s Lodge members, no commercial or public RV camping/parking is permitted at the property. If development is proposed in the future, the site will have to come into conformance with the requirements for all commercial and private driveways to be permanently surfaced with dust free material. Streets & Sidewalks: The current site has two existing access points along NE Brizendine Road. There is no existing sidewalk along the frontage of the subject property, 200 NE Brizendine Rd. However, there is existing sidewalk along the frontage of the adjoining Elks Lodge property to the South, 100 NE Brizendine Dr. Since no further development is proposed at this time, the applicant is not being required to install one at 200 NE Brizendine Rd. Pedestrian Access: The applicant is not proposing to modify the site; therefore, they are not required to bring it up to the current code requirements. Traffic: There are no property modifications proposed as part of this PD Concept Plan. Therefore, no additional impacts are expected for traffic. Stormwater: There are no property modifications proposed as part of this PD Concept Plan. Therefore, no additional impacts are expected for stormwater. Sanitary Sewer: There are no property modifications proposed as part of this PD Concept Plan. Therefore, no additional impacts are expected for sanitary sewer. Signage: The applicant has not proposed signage at this point. Any signs will be reviewed through an Administrative Sign Permit so long as they meet the Sign Code. Frontage & Landscaping: The applicant is requesting the landscaping requirements to be waived since no development is proposed at this time. If development is proposed in the future, the site will have to come into conformance with the landscaping and buffering. Open Space: Since this property is smaller than five (5) acres, the site is exempt from Open Space System requirements per UDC Section 406.030. Preservation: The site is currently developed. There are mature trees to the south of the existing accessory dwelling on the site. There are also mature trees serving as a landscape buffer along the North, East, and Southern boundaries of the property. The applications are not proposing to disturb these areas or landscape. Phasing: There is no further development proposed at this time. Page 6 of 8  Project: Elks Lodge BPOE Plan Case: RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC-08-24-9291 Screening: No dumpster or other ground- or roof-mounted equipment is proposed at this time. However, any future equipment or dumpsters shall meet the screening requirements in UDC Section 407.040. Outdoor Lighting: Any additional lighting must meet the City of Blue Springs Outdoor Lighting requirements. Modifications Requested of The Underlying Zoning District: The applicant has requested modifications to the following regulations through the Planned Development process:  Per UDC Section 407.040, Site and Landscape Design, waive all landscaping requirements since no further development is proposed at this time.  Per UDC Section 505.210, Surfaces, waive requirements for all commercial and private driveways to be permanently surfaced with dust free material. Review Criteria: A Planned Development Concept Plan shall be reviewed according to the following criteria: 1. The proposed PD District is compatible with present development in the area, and will not have a significant, adverse effect on the surrounding area. STAFF RESPONSE: The plan is compatible with present development in the area and is not expected to have a significant, adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed PD District is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare, as well as efficiency and economy in the use of land and its resources. STAFF RESPONSE: The plan is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding area. Staff believes the PD district is also consistent with the efficiency and economy in the use of the land. 3. The proposed PD District is consistent with the overall direction, intent and policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RESPONSE: The proposal will be consistent with the general land uses identified in the Comprehensive Plan as “Distinct Destinations”, which encourages as a mix of larger-scale and regionally significant land uses that are different from other places in Blue Springs and the region. These areas may include a mix of retail, service/entertainment, office, institutional/civic or light industrial land uses, but a unique land use policy for each area emphasizes different uses, patterns and characteristics that make the destinations distinct. This is in alignment with the proposed PD zoning district and the adjacent Elks Lodge property to the south, which is zoned “SO” Service Office. 4. The proposed PD District provides for a creative and innovative design which could not otherwise be achieved under the zoning regulations for the districts listed in Chapter 404. Page 7 of 8  Project: Elks Lodge BPOE Plan Case: RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC-08-24-9291 STAFF RESPONSE: The plan reflects creative and innovative land use designs with outcomes that could not be achieved under the zoning regulations for the districts listed in the UDC. 5. The exceptions from the zoning regulations requested in the proposed PD are warranted by virtue of innovative design and amenities incorporated in the PD District. STAFF RESPONSE: The applicant believes the requested exceptions through the proposed PD are warranted due to the lack of proposed development. 6. The PD District reflects generally accepted and sound planning and urban design principles with respect to applying the Comprehensive Plan and any specific plans to the area. STAFF RESPONSE: The plan reflects generally accepted and sound planning and urban design principles, specifically those outlined in the Comprehensive Plan as noted under previous review criteria. 7. The request for a PD District meets all of the review criteria for a Zoning Map amendment. STAFF RESPONSE: The PD Concept Plan meets the minimum review criteria for a rezoning as noted in the staff report. Approval of a Concept Plan shall constitute acceptance of the overall planning concepts and development parameters. An approved Concept Plan shall lapse and be of no further force and effect if a Final Plan (or a Final Plan for a designated phase of the Concept Plan) has not been approved within two (2) years of the date of approval of the Concept Plan. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning application.  The property is located within the Adams Dairy Parkway Overlay (ADP-O) district. The proposed rezoning request is only to change the base zoning from “RE” to “PD”. The ADP-O will remain and will not be affected by the change in base zoning. Staff recommends approval of the Planned Development Concept Plan application with the following conditions: 1. Approval based on the representations of any drawings presented as part of this application does not waive any requirement or development standard contained in the UDC, unless modified by the Planned Development. a) Per UDC Section 407.040, Site and Landscape Design, waive all landscaping requirements since no further development is proposed at this time. b) Per UDC Section 505.210, Surfaces, waive requirements for all commercial and private driveways to be permanently surfaced with dust free material. 2. The PD Standards shall only permit “SO” Service Office land uses outlined in the UDC with the addition of “Club, Private”, “Accessory Residential Dwelling”, and “Accessory Recreational Vehicle Parking” land uses. 3. If further site development is proposed in the future, compliance with the UDC will be required. Page 8 of 8  RZ-08-24-9290; PDC-08-24-9291 10.14.2024 10.21.2024 9.28.2024 9.27.2024 Chris Willis Rezoning and Planned Development Concept Plan RZ-08-24-9290; PDC-08-24-9291 Elks Lodge BPOE Exhibit #2 Received 08/30/2024 10:39:26 AM  Received 08/30/2024 10:39:29 AM  Received 08/30/2024 10:39:30 AM  Received 08/30/2024 10:39:30 AM  Received 08/30/2024 10:39:30 AM  Received 08/30/2024 10:39:30 AM  Received 08/30/2024 10:39:30 AM  Received 08/30/2024 10:39:30 AM Rezoning and Planned Development Concept Plan RZ-08-24-9290; PDC-08-24-9291 Elks Lodge BPOE Exhibit #3 Rezoning and Planned Development Concept Plan RZ-08-24-9290; PDC-08-24-9291 Elks Lodge BPOE Exhibit #4  Parcel ID Situs Address Situs City Situs State Situs ZipCode Owner Owner Address 36-800-01-13-01-0-00-000 28504 SE BRIZENDINE RD UNINCORPORATED MO 64014 AMERICAN LEGION POST #499 499 S M 7 HWY BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64015 36-720-02-04-02-1-00-000 PUBLIC OWNED BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 CITY OF BLUE SPRINGS 903 W MAIN ST BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64015 36-720-02-04-01-4-00-000 PUBLIC OWNED BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 CITY OF BLUE SPRINGS 903 W MAIN ST BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64015 36-720-02-04-02-2-00-000 200 NE BRIZENDINE RD BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER 100 NE BRIZENDINE RD 2509 BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64014 36-720-02-05-00-0-00-000 100 NE BRIZENDINE RD BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS 100 NE BRIZENDINE RD 2509 BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64014 36-800-01-05-00-0-00-000 205 NE BRIZENDINE RD BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 CITY OF BLUE SPRINGS 903 W MAIN ST BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64015 36-720-02-04-01-5-00-000 500 NE BRIZENDINE RD BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 FLETCHER WILLIAM KEITH-TR PO BOX 268 BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64013-0268 36-720-02-06-00-0-00-000 150 NE BRIZENDINE RD BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS 100 NE BRIZENDINE RD 2509 BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64014 36-720-02-04-03-1-00-000 PUBLIC OWNED BLUE SPRINGS MO 64014 CITY OF BLUE SPRINGS 903 W MAIN ST BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64015 Rezoning and Planned Development Concept Plan RZ-08-24-9290; PDC-08-24-9291 Elks Lodge BPOE Exhibit #5  September 27, 2024 Ref: Public Hearing: Rezone & Planned Development Concept Plan | RZ-08-24-9290 & PDC- 08-24-9291 BPOE Elks 200 NE Brizendine Rd. Parcel # 36-720-02-04-02-2-00-000 Dear Property Owner: A Public Hearing will be held by the Planning Commission and the City Council of the City of Blue Springs to receive comments from interested parties and citizens relative to a request by the applicant, Mr. Duckworth of BPOE Elks Lodge, to rezone 4.79 +/- acres of property from “RE” (Residential Estate) to “PD” (Planned Development) zoning district and to approve a Planned Development Concept Plan to allow for the existing private club , accessory dwelling, and Recreational Vehicle Park land uses, and all permitted uses within the “SO” (Service Office) zoning district. You are receiving this notice because County records indicate you own property within 185 feet of the boundary of the site in question. Interested parties may view the application materials on file by contacting the Community Development Department via email at ComDevLegal@bluespringsgov.com or at City Hall at 903 W Main Street, Blue Springs, MO. The hearing will be held in the Council Chambers in the Howard L. Brown Public Safety Building located at 1100 SW Smith Street, Blue Springs on the following dates: Planning Commission - Monday, October 14, 2024 @ 6:30 p.m. & City Council – Monday, October 21, 2024 @ 6:00 p.m. Your attendance and comments are welcome at these meetings. Questions concerning this matter may be directed to the Community Development Department at 816-228-0207. Sincerely, CITY OF BLUE SPRINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Christopher Willis Rezoning and Planned Development Concept Plan RZ-08-24-9290; PDC-08-24-9291 Elks Lodge BPOE Exhibit #6 Associate Planner Page 2 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT Meeting Dates: Planning Commission: October 14, 2024 Project Name: Life Unlimited – Pole Sign Site Location: 3500 NW South Outer Road Project Request: MSP-08-24-9285; Master / Alternative Sign Plan to allow the existing non- conforming pole sign on the northeast corner of the property. Applicant: Mark Bertrand | Life Unlimited Property Owner: Same as Applicant Staff Planner: Dave McCumber | Development Review Manager Project Description: The applicant is requesting approval of a Master/Alternative Sign Plan to allow the usage of the existing non-conforming pole sign near the northeast corner of the property. The pole sign was originally installed and used by the former UMB Bank. The sign is designated as non-conforming because it fails to meet the setback requirements of 1/3 the height of the sign from the front property line as required by the Sign Code Section 501.060(C)(3)(c)(2)(d)(i). The applicant has indicated that they desire to repaint the sign and put new sign faces in the cabinet. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with conditions of the Master/Alternative Sign Plan application. Conditions are identified at the end of the staff report. Previous Actions: Date Review Body Action 06/17/2024 City Council Approved a Condition Use Permit (Ord. 5336) for the Daycare, Commercial land use at 3500 NW South Outer Road. Future Applications: The applicable sign permits must be obtained prior to installation. Adjacent Properties: Direction Current Zoning Current Land Use(s) North: “GB” General Business and (Hotel) across I-70 “RC” Regional Commercial South: “GB” General Business Outdoor Sales and Service, Equipment East: “RC” Regional Commercial Outdoor Sales and Service, Equipment West: “GB” General Business (Restaurant, General) across South Outer Road MASTER / ALTERNATIVE SIGN PLAN ANALYSIS A Master/Alternative Sign Plan provides flexibility within the sign code for exceptions to be made on a case-by-case basis dependent upon location, use, and visibility from the public right-of-way. Overview: DESCRIPTION TYPE QTY SQFT TOTAL NOTES/ISSUES Proposed Non-conforming Pole 1 140 140 This property abuts the I-70 Pole Sign corridor and is allowed to have a pole sign of this size. Page 1 of 4  Project: Life Unlimited - Pole Sign Plan Case: MSP-08-24-9285 The purpose of this Master/Alternative Sign Plan is to review signage that does not meet all requirements of the Sign Code. Types: The applicant is requesting Master/Alternative Sign Plan approval to utilize the existing non-conforming pole sign. Staff believes that the request is warranted as the existing structure meets all other requirements of the Sign Code pertaining to pole signs. Location: The subject property is located at 3500 NW South Outer Road, just south of Interstate 70. The sign is located near the NE driveway and corner of the property. Measurement: A pole sign on this property is regulated dimensionally by the following standards: Pole Sign when Contiguous with I-70: SIZE HEIGHT SETBACK QTY NOTES/ISSUES Allowed 161-sq. ft. 35-ft. 1/3 height 1 Setback measured from widest of pole portion of the structure (cabinet) sign Proposed 140-sq. ft. 32-ft. 0-ft. 1 If new sign were proposed at the same height, the sign would be required to be setback 10.6-ft. from the property line measured from widest portion of the structure (cabinet) The requested deviation is highlighted above in yellow. Design & Construction (501.040): Placement: The location of the sign is the non-conforming feature that requires approval through the Master/Alternative Sign Plan process. Staff has reviewed the application and has determined that the location of the sign does not impede the sight triangle on NW South Outer Road. Design Standards: The proposed signage complements the design, color and composition of other on-site of the building. No other signs have been permitted on the property. Materials: The proposed sign meets the material standards. Illumination: The signage is proposed to be illuminated. Construction Standards: The sign will need a building permit. Review Criteria: Approval of a Master Sign Plan shall meet the Review Criteria in Section 501.030.D of the Sign Code, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Meet the intent of this Sign Code. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff believes the request does meet the intent. The Sign Code allows this size and type of sign on this property given that it is adjacent to I- Page 2 of 4  Project: Life Unlimited - Pole Sign Plan Case: MSP-08-24-9285 70. The setback of the sign is the only non-conforming characteristic of the structure. 2. Not result in or create a precedent that may result in visual blight, discord, confusion, or clutter that significantly dilutes or obscures the message of other signs or degrades the character, attractiveness, and general welfare of Blue Springs as a place to live and conduct business. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff does not believe the sign will result in visual blight, discord, confusion, or clutter. The signs, other than meeting the minimum setback, is compliant with the Sign Code. 3. Not result in signage that significantly alters the architectural, cultural, historical, or contextual character of the surrounding area due to the size or location of the signage. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff does not believe the sign will significantly alter the architectural, cultural, historical, or contextual character of the surrounding area. 4. Not infringe on public safety or interfere in any way with the safe operation of all modes of transportation. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff does not believe the sign will infringe on public safety or interfere with safe operation of all modes of transportation. 5. Not impact the rights of adjacent and nearby property owners, residents, and any other entity with a vested interest. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff does not believe the sign will impact the rights of adjacent and nearby property owners, residents, and any other entity with a vested interest. 6. Be based on the time, place, and manner of the proposed signage, not on the content or message of the signage. STAFF RESPONSE: Staff feels as though the sign is appropriate for the time, place, and manner since the pole sign meets all other criteria of the Sign Code besides the setback. 7. Meet the following review criteria as applicable: When requesting approval of any other permanent sign, the sign shall provide higher quality signage than required by this Sign Code and exhibit aesthetic quality, creativity, or innovation STAFF RESPONSE: The sign is not necessarily creative or innovative and the style of the sign appears to be similar to others in the area; however, the intent is to utilize this existing pole sign instead of removing it to build a new one. Therefore, staff believes that the request to allow this existing sign that meets all other criteria of the Sign Code is warranted. Page 3 of 4  Project: Life Unlimited - Pole Sign Plan Case: MSP-08-24-9285 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Master / Alternative Sign Plan application with the following condition: 1. Prior to installation of the proposed signage, administrative sign permit approval and administrative building permit approval must be obtained for the sign. Page 4 of 4 MSP-08-24-9285 MSP-08-24-9285  14’ 10’ • Flex face sign • Double sided 32’ 22’ 56” Customer: Life Unlimited Sign Dimensions: 14’ x 10’ = 140sf PMS Colors: Address: 3500 NW S Outer Rd Store Front Sq. Footage: Trim Cap: City/St./Zip: Blue Springs, MO Contact: Mark Bertrand Returns: 1021 S. Brown St. | Liberty, MO 64068 816-407-SIGN (7446) Phone: mbertrand@luinc.org Sales Person: Barry Raceway: Email: Designer: Cody 816-588-6724 www.victorysignco.com Proofs: ____ of 3 Customer signature on this proof authorizes Victory Sign Company to proceed with the construction of your product exactly as specified on the proof. We recommend showing your proof to another individual for review, as corrections must be made prior to submitting your final signature. Your product will be replicated from the approved proof, regardless of spelling, grammar or design errors, whether incurred by the customer or Victory Sign Company. Once produced, any further updates or revisions to your product will incur additional charges up to 100% of the original order amount at the discretion of Victory Sign Company. This is standard policy for all sign companies and printers. This design concept is submitted only for your approval or review and is the exclusive property of Victory Sign Company. This concept may not be copied, reproduced, exhibited or utilized for any purpose, in part or in whole by any individual without written consent of Victory Sign Company. Our renderings are in attempt to illustrate an accurate Received representation of the final product. Victory Sign Company cannot be held responsible for differences between renderings and the finished product caused by monitors, printers, or environmental lighting. Victory Sign Company allows three free revisions on initial proof design any revisions beyond that are billed at $100 hr. Thank you. 08/29/2024 4:37:21 PM  Received 08/29/2024 4:36:05 PM  Received 08/29/2024 4:37:08 PM  Received 08/29/2024 4:37:10 PM  Received 08/29/2024 4:37:10 PM  Received 08/29/2024 4:37:10 PM  MONTHLY REPORT August 2024 Building Permit Activity Type of Permit Aug 2024 Aug 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Single-Family Detached 25 38 118 94 Single-Family Attached 0 0 0 0 Two-Family 0 0 3 (6 units) 2 (4 units) Multi-Family 0 0 7 (28 units) 8 (32 units) Total Dwelling Units 25 38 152 130 Miscellaneous Residential 25 24 145 139 (additions & alterations) Commercial—New 0 2 10 11 Commercial—Alterations 3 8 44 39 Total Building Permits* 134 137 856 824 *Includes all the above permits plus non-structural permits (mechanical, plumbing, etc.) Building-Related Activity Aug 2024 Aug 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Total Square Feet 93,873 204,595 964,480 751,086 Total Construction Cost $4,757,959 $9,848,744 $100,249,644 $34,442,397 Total Inspections 618 514 4,033 4,054 Single-Family Building Permits Code Enforcement Activity Code Reference Description Cases Opened 200-270 Public Health, Safety, and Welfare 167 300-390 Traffic Code 0 401-411 Zoning 11 500-520 (excl. 501) Building and Construction 42 501 Sign Code 0 600-655 Business and Occupation 0 700-715 Utilities 0 Total Cases 220 Total Code Cases Most Common Code Cases in August Code Reference Description Cases Opened 245.060 Nuisance Inspection—Citizen Complaint 57 245.330 High Weeds/Grass—Prohibited 52 245.160: A (11) Trash—Prohibited 40 Planning Activity Case Number Project Planning City Council Ordinance Commission UDCT-07-24-9230 Fence Setbacks Approved 8/12/24 Approved 8/19/24 5352 RZ-06-24-9206 5348 GDP-06-24-9207 Small Sliders Approved 8/19/24 Approved 8/12/24 5349 CUP-06-24-9202 PP-06-24-9204 Google Fiber 5350 Approved 8/12/24 Approved 8/19/24 PF-06-24-9203 MCI Hut 5351 PF-06-24-9203 Scire Estates Approved 8/12/24 Approved 8/19/24 5353 PF-06-24-9195 PF-06-24-9178 Dutch Bros SPDR-06-24-9180 Approved 8/12/24 Approved 8/19/24 5354 Coffee SPDR-07-24-9221 Small Sliders Approved 8/26/24 N/A N/A RZ-07-24-9217 Flex Spaces GDP-07-24-9218 Phase II Approved 8/26/24 N/A N/A PP-07-24-9219 RZ-03-24-9093 Tommy’s Express Car N/A Failed 8/26/24 N/A PDC-03-24-9095) Wash Rezoning Planning Activity—Administrative Approvals Case Number Project Administrative Approval N/A Sign Permit Activity Type of Sign Permit Aug 2024 Aug 2023 YTD 2024 YTD 2023 Sign Face Replacement 8 8 30 35 Ground-Mounted Signs 0 2 14 15 Building-Mounted Signs 5 6 54 61 Temporary Signs 8 4 31 16 Other Signs (Flags, Paired- 0 0 4 2 Bracket, Mural, etc.) Total Signs Issued 21 20 133 129