Historic Review Board
Regular MeetingFort Mill, SC · August 9, 2022
Minutes
MINUTES
TOWN OF FORT MILL
HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD
August 9th, 2022
112 Confederate Street
4:30 PM
Present: Chairman Louis Roman, Megan Brinton, Scott Couchenour, Elizabeth Leventis, Jessica Scarlett,
Nikki Todaro, Planning Director Penelope Karagounis, Senior Planner Alex Moore
Absent: David Booth
Guests: Trisha James, CJ Hines, Amy Dellinger
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Louis Roman called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chairman Louis Roman entertained a motion to approve the minutes from the June 14th, 2022, HRB meeting.
Elizabeth Leventis made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Scott Couchenour seconded the motion to
approve the minutes. The minutes were then approved by a vote of 6-0.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)
Since the applicant for the first item on the agenda was not in attendance at the meeting, Planning Director Penelope
Karagounis requested that Chairman Louis Roman reverse the items on the HRB agenda so that the case involving
a request for a certificate of appropriateness for a proposed ground sign to be placed at 134 North White Street be
heard first.
Senior Planner Moore then provided an outline of request which included a COA application for a proposed ground
sign to be located at 134 North White Street. Moore stated the proposed sign would be an on-premises ground sign
for Fort Mill Pharmacy which would occupy the existing building at 134 White Street. He noted that the application
indicated that this property is located at 134 N. White Street and is located within the town’s historic district. The
application showed the proposed installation of one double-sided, non-illuminated monument sign mounted on a
brick base fronting Clebourne Street.
Moore then stated that the town’s historic district guidelines indicate that ground signs should maintain the visual
qualities and ambience of a building, site, and surrounding context in the following manner:
i. Ground signs should be placed in a location that is readable from the street and appropriate
for the building and its surroundings.
ii. Ground signs should be subordinate in size to the building and in scale with the building’s
architectural elements.
iii. Ground signs should be designed to not be so elaborate that they replicate or upstage the
architecture of a historic building or its surroundings.
iv. Only external illumination shall be used.
v. Do not use internally lit plastic or plastic looking boxes
Moore then presented the specific zoning requirements for a ground sign.
i. The maximum height of a ground sign is 8’. The proposed ground sign is 6’ in height.
ii. The maximum number of ground signs per street frontage is one. They propose one sign
on the Clebourne Street frontage.
iii. The maximum square footage for a non-illuminated ground sign is 80 square feet. This
sign is proposed to be 21.32 square feet.
iv. The minimum setback requirement for a ground sign is 15’ from a property line and/or 3’
from the edge of the right-of-way.
v. The advertising message for such a sign should not occupy more than 40% of the total sign
area. The advertising message of this sign proposes an area of approximately 8.16 square
feet which comprises 38% of the signage area.
Senior Planner Moore then stated that Fort Mill Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant approval for a
certificate of appropriateness for the proposed ground sign as submitted.
Megan Brinton then asked if the sign base was already in place.
Moore responded that the sign base had not been placed on the property yet but that there was a temporary sign
located on the property.
Megan Brinton then asked if the brick on the sign would match the building.
Moore responded that the sign was designed so the brick on the sign would match that of the building.
Megan Brinton then asked if there were plans for up-lighting of the sign.
Moore responded that he knew of no intention at this time to provide signage up-lighting.
Scott Couchenour asked if SCDOT had completed their project at the intersection of North White Street and
Clebourne Street.
Planning Director Karagounis stated that SCDOT had indeed completed this project.
Scott Couchenour then asked if the town requires an address to be placed on such signs as that being proposed.
Senior Planner Alex Moore responded that he was not aware of such a requirement but that he would check on this.
There being no further questions or comments, Chairman Roman entertained a motion.
Scott Couchenour made a motion that the request for a certificate of appropriateness for the ground sign be approved
as submitted.
Jessica Scartlett seconded the motion.
Then, by a vote of 6-0, the HRB approved the ground sign as presented for 134 North White Street.
2. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)
The second item on the agenda included a request from Shanon Little for a certificate of appropriateness for a
wall sign, window signage, and a change of paint colors for the building located at 231 Main Street.
Senior Planner Moore presented the information pertaining to this request. The applicant is “You, Me, & the Dog”
represented by the business owner, Shanon Little.
Moore presented the historic district guidelines which would pertain to the project proposal:
1. This property is located at 231 & 233 Main Street. It is located within the historic district and
is also listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
2. The town’s historic district guidelines indicate that there should be clear objectives for signage
with limited impacts on defining features of a given building.
3. Window signage should be designed to minimize the amount of window covered and be painted
on the glass or hung inside a window.
4. Regarding the proposed color change on the doors, the historic district guidelines indicated that
the preferred color palette in Fort Mill is that which promotes a traditional or historic feel.
Moore then presented the specific proposals as submitted:
1. Wall Sign: The wall sign as proposed does indicate a clear objective design and the impacts
on the upon the building’s character defining features are limited. Further, the location of the
proposed wall sign is appropriate, and it fits the architecture and scale of the building.
Additionally, this proposed wall sign meets the town’s zoning requirements in that it does not
exceed 15% of the façade area.
2. Window Signage: The proposed window signage is shown on page 24 and page 24 of the
packet. Although the applicant plans to place peel-and-stick lettering on the exterior of the
windows, staff recommends that these stickers be of outdoor-grade if placed on the exterior.
3. Door Color: The applicant proposes to change the color of the two doors that front Main Street.
The color would be a darker shade of the current blue, indicated to be “coastal blue” per page
21 of the packet, with a matte finish. This color would be consistent with the historic district
guidelines.
Moore concluded his presentation by stating that planning staff recommended that that the HRB grant approval for
a Certificate of Appropriateness for the improvements as presented with the condition that the window signage
material be of outdoor grade.
Planning Director Karagounis then interjected that people get caught up on the “cuteness” of fonts on signage. She
indicated that this would make the wall sign font difficult to read from Main Street with the “me” in “You, Me and
the Dog” looking like “the.”
Elizabeth Leventis then stated that she had the same immediate reaction regarding the signage. She also noted that
the window signage was not consistent.
Senior Planner Moore then noted that the board could make it a condition that the branding of the business be
consistent.
Elizabeth Leventis then stated that she would like to have a better drawing illustrating the proposed window signage.
Nikki Todaro then stated that the proposed copy as presented for the windows would cover a good deal of the
window.
Moore then asked the HRB if they wished for this proposal to come back to them for further review or if they would
like for staff to handle this administratively.
Chairman Roman then asked if there had been any discussion about the upper windows in this building as they are
currently boarded up.
Planning Director Karagounis then noted that if opportunities arose then town council wanted boarded up windows
in the downtown area to be opened. However, she also noted that this applicant does not own this building.
Chairman Roman then stated that the proposed “coastal blue” color on the doors was within the parameters of what
the HRB was looking to see, but that perhaps there could be opportunity for also upgrading the existing awning on
this building.
Chairman Roman then indicated that it would be necessary to determine whether they wished to approve the
submittal with conditions and allow staff to handle it or if HRB deemed it necessary for the applicant to be present
at a meeting to present changes as recommended.
The HRB indicated that they wished for the applicant to come back to them with changes as discussed.
Chairman Roman then entertained a motion for deferral on the agenda item.
Scott Couchenour made a motion that action on the item be deferred until the next called meeting.
Chairman Roman then asked for clarification from Alex Moore on the items which were to be addressed by the
applicant at the next called meeting.
Moore then stated that the following items needed to be addressed by the applicant and reviewed by HRB:
1. The applicant needs to submit a true and accurate schematic of the proposed window signage.
2. All business branding must match with readable font used.
3. The paint used on the doors must be suitable for outdoor use.
4. A swatch sample indicating that the paint used on the doors will match the color of the awning.
5. The possibility of the currently boarded, upper story windows being restored (suggestion only).
Megan Brinton then seconded the motion.
Then, by a vote of 6-0, the HRB approved the item’s deferral to the next scheduled meeting with the conditions as
noted.
There being no other business, Chairman Roman adjourned the meeting at 5:00 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Alex J. Moore, AICP
Senior Planner
August 31st, 2022
Agenda
HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD MEETING
112 Confedera te S tree t
August 9th, 2022
4:30 PM
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. HRB Meeting: June 14th, 2022 [Pages 2 - 3]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR TODAY’S MEETING
1. Fort Mill Historic District Signage Guidelines [Pages 4 – 12]
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) [Pages 13 - 25]
Applicant Name: Shanon Little (You, Me, & The Dog)
Owner Name: Michael W. Chase
Property Address: 231/233 Main Street
Purpose: Certificate of Appropriateness request for proposed wall sign
Property information: Town of Fort Mill Historic Preservation District
LC, Local Commercial Zoning District
2. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) [Pages 26 - 32]
Applicant Name: Kathy R. Hayworth (Sign Systems, Inc.)
Owner Name: L & C Land Holdings, Inc.
Property Address: 134 N. White Street
Purpose: Certificate of Appropriateness request for proposed ground sign
Property information: Town of Fort Mill Historic Preservation District
LC, Local Commercial Zoning District
ADJOURN
The following press was notified of the meeting by email or fax in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act: The
Herald; CN2; WRHI; Fort Mill Times, and WBTV. The agenda was also posted at the entrance to Town Hall the
required length of time and on the Town website. The Town of Fort Mill is committed to assuring accessibility with
reasonable accommodation, of Town services and facilities for all individuals, in compliance with federal law. Please
contact the Town Manager’s Office at 803-547-2116 if you need assistance.
1
MINUTES
TOWN OF FORT MILL
HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD
June 14th, 2022
112 Confederate Street
4:30 PM
Present: Chairman Louis Roman, David Booth, Megan Brinton, Scott Couchenour, Elizabeth Leventis,
Jessica Scarlett, Nikki Todaro, Planning Director Penelope Karagounis, Planner I Tim Kramer, Senior
Planner Alex Moore
Absent:
N/A
Guests:
Joseph Brennand, Tracey Roman
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Louis Roman called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chairman Louis Roman entertained a motion to approve the minutes. David Booth made a motion to approve the
minutes from the April 26th, 2022, meeting as presented. Megan Brinton seconded the motion to approve the
minutes. The minutes were then approved by a vote of 7-0.
NEW BUSINESS
Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)
The only item on the agenda included a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) submitted by Joseph
Brennand of Seaboard Signs, on behalf of 215 N. Main St, LLC, to install a wall sign and a projecting sign at 215
Main Street. Senior Planner Alex Moore noted the location of the property as being within the town’s historic
district along with the zoning of LC, Local Commercial.
Senior Planner Moore then provided the parameters for a wall sign within the town’s historic district. This included
discernable and appealing graphics, an appropriate location on the façade, compatibility with the architecture and
scale of the building, compatibility with the building and surrounding businesses. Moore then stated that the zoning
ordinance allowed for a wall sign could not exceed an area equal to 15% of the area of the wall to which it is affixed.
Moore then provided the parameters for a projecting sign. These parameters included the same as for the wall sign
as noted above. He then stated that the zoning ordinance requires that a projecting sign shall not exceed an area of
12 square feet and may not extend more than three feet from the façade to which it is affixed.
Senior Planner Moore then introduced Joe Brennand with Seaboard Signs to answer any further questions that board
members might have regarding the proposed signs.
2
Mr. Brennand stated that this was the second location of “Whitaker’s” that his company had made signs for, the
first one being in Conway, SC, and located within a historic district. As with the Whitaker’s location in Conway,
the signage would consist of aluminum and be painted matte black. The sign lettering would be aluminum plate,
cut by a router. Thus, the signage would not look as “flat.”
Chairman Roman then asked board members if there were any questions.
Scott Couchenour asked if either of the signs would be lighted.
Mr. Brennand stated that neither sign would be lighted.
There being no further questions or comments, Chairman Roman entertained a motion
Elizabeth Leventis made a motion to approve the wall sign and projecting sign as presented.
David Booth seconded the motion.
Then, by a vote of 7-0, the HRB approved the wall sign and projecting sign as presented for 215 Main Street.
Planning Director Penelope Karagounis then introduced Mr. Tim Kramer, the new planner within the Fort Mill
Planning Department. She noted that Mr. Kramer had a good deal of experience with trails and that the town was
very happy to have him.
Mr. Kramer indicated that he was looking forward to working with the town as well as the historic review board in
the future.
Chairman Roman and the historic review board welcomed Mr. Kramer as well.
There being no other business, Chairman Roman adjourned the meeting at 4:45 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Alex J. Moore, AICP
Senior Planner
July 29th, 2022
3
Design Guidelines for New and Modified Signs
Signs are used to identify the location of a business and attract customers. Signs should be both integral
to a building’s design and noticeable to customers. When planning signage for a building:
Establish objectives for signage
Signage should provide clear, legible information about a business
while also appealing to prospective customers. A signage plan should
demonstrate forethought in the design, size, placement and graphic
format of each sign to ensure an integrated signage strategy and
design. Every proposed sign should have a purpose.
Limit impacts on character-defining features Signage should provide clear,
A building’s historic architecture, such as its pilasters and decorative legible information about a business
banding, is important to protect. These features may also be a major while also appealing to prospective
draw to customers and provide a unique business identity. Plan signage customers.
to highlight, rather than cover or physically impact, these elements.
Find original sign locations on a building
Step back and examine a building from across the street. Does it have
a recessed or framed horizontal band over the storefront or below the
roof parapet? Does the building have large shop windows? Many historic
and even modern buildings are designed with sign bands. Similarly,
large shop windows were intended for pedestrian-scale advertising. Use
of these originally designed sign spaces will ensure that new signage Appropriately placed and sized
is well integrated into a building’s architecture. signage, crafted of durable
materials, can reinforce the
architecture of a historic building
Ensure sign compatibility with building and site and its surroundings, and attract
Consider what type and size of signage would best fit the architecture customers.
and scale of a historic building. What signage would best relate to a
building’s original vertical and horizontal patterns? Are the proposed
signs made of high quality materials that correspond with the building
and its surroundings? Appropriately placed and sized signage, crafted
of durable materials, can reinforce the architecture of a historic building
and its surroundings, and attract customers. Conversely, maximizing
signage may often lead to visual clutter that does not promote business
activity.
Appropriately placed and sized
Consider impacts on the block signage, crafted of durable
Is the building located in a historic district next to other historic materials, can reinforce the
buildings? Is the building in a residential setting? Consider placing architecture of a historic building
and its surroundings, and attract
signs at the same height and similar façade locations as adjacent
customers.
commercial buildings to provide an integrated block appearance. When
located next to residential uses, consider the visual impact, as well as
the potential “light spray” impacts, of signage.
Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 101
4
Create graphic interest
A generic sign box does little to acknowledge a business’ location in a
unique historic district or on a historic landmark site. Ensure that any
proposed signage lives up to its historic landmark or district location,
and is distinctive. In most cases, this translates into signage that is
creative and visually interesting, providing pedestrians with a sense
of curiosity and delight.
Sign Character
A new sign should be in character with the materials, colors and
details of the building. The integration of the sign with the building or
building façade is important and should be a key factor in its design
Encourage signage that is creative and installation.
and visually interesting, providing
pedestrians with a sense of
curiosity and delight. 5.3 A sign should be subordinate to the overall building
composition.
• Design a sign to be simple in character.
• Scale a sign to fit with the façade of the building.
• Locate a sign to emphasize design elements of the façade Itself.
• Mount a sign to fit within existing architectural features using
the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of the
building.
• Rooftop, animated and message board signs are inappropriate.
Sign Content
A simple sign design is preferred.
Sign content should be designed to be visually interesting and clearly
legible.
5.4 A simple sign design is preferred.
• Typefaces that are in keeping with those seen in the area
traditionally are encouraged.
• Avoid hard-to-read or overly intricate typeface styles.
102 Chapter 5: Guidelines for Signs
5
Sign Lighting
The sign illumination source should be shielded to minimize glare. Light
intensity should not overpower the building or street edge. Small and
discreet modern light fittings may provide an unobtrusive alternative
to traditionally styled lamp units.
5.5 Use shielded lighting source on a sign.
• Directing lighting at signage from an external, shielded lamp is
appropriate.
• A warm light, similar to daylight, is appropriate.
• Strobe lighting is not appropriate.
• Internal illumination is not appropriate. Use shielded lighting source on a
sign.
5.6 Silhouette lighting may provide an effective and subtle
form of lighting which can be used to accentuate both sign and
building.
• This form of lighting can be used with either wall or sign panels
or individual letters.
• The light source should not be visible.
Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 103
6
Sign Installation
The installation of a sign is an integral aspect in the retention of key
architectural features and in minimizing damage to the building.
5.7 Avoid damaging or obscuring architectural details or
features when installing signs.
• Minimize the number of anchor points on the wall when feasible.
Sign Materials
A sign should exhibit qualities of style, permanence and compatibility
with the natural and built environment.
5.8 Use sign materials that are compatible with the building
façade and site.
• Use colors, materials and details that are compatible with the
overall character of the façade.
• Permanent, durable materials that reflect the Fort Mill context
are encouraged.
• Avoid highly reflective materials.
Sign Color
Color should be used both to accentuate the sign design and message
and also to integrate the sign or lettering with the building and its
context.
Avoid damaging or obscuring 5.9 Use colors for the sign that are generally compatible
architectural details or features
with those of the building front.
when installing signs.
• Limit the number of colors used on a sign. In general, no more
than three colors should be used, although accent colors may
also be appropriate.
Use colors for the sign that are
generally compatible with those of
the building front.
104 Chapter 5: Guidelines for Signs
7
Appropriate Sign Types
Sign types that are considered generally to be appropriate are defined
here. While selecting a sign, an important design principle to consider
is that signs should not overwhelm the architecture of the building.
Consistent placement of signs according to building style, type, size,
location and materials creates a sense of visual continuity.
Awnings or Canopy Sign
This is a sign located on the face of a canopy or awning.
5.10 A sign located on or under a canopy or awning may be
considered.
• These are most appropriate in areas with high pedestrian use.
• Consider sign lettering centered on a building canopy where a
flush-mounted sign would obscure architectural details.
Awning and canopy signs are most
appropriate in areas with high
pedestrian use.
Consider sign lettering centered on a building canopy where a flush-
mounted sign would obscure architectural details.
Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 105
8
Window Sign
This is a sign painted on the surface of, or located on the interior of,
a display window.
5.11 Design a window sign to:
• Minimize the amount of window covered.
• Be painted on the glass or hung inside a window.
Wall Sign
This is an attached sign painted on or attached to the wall or surface of
Design a window sign to minimize a building or display surface which is parallel to the supporting surface.
the amount of window covered.
5.12 Flush mounted wall signs may be considered.
• Place wall signs to align with nearby buildings.
• Determine if decorative moldings exist that could define a sign
panel. If so, locate a flush-mounted wall sign to fit within a panel
formed by moldings or transom panels.
• Do not obstruct character-defining features of a building with
signage.
Design a window sign to be painted
on the glass or hung inside a 5.13 Design a wall sign to minimize the depth of a sign panel
window.
or letters.
• A wall sign should be relatively flush with the building façade.
• Design a wall sign to sit within, rather than forward of, the fascia
or other architectural details of the building.
Design a wall sign to minimize the
depth of a sign panel or letters.
A wall sign should be relatively flush
with the building façade.
106 Chapter 5: Guidelines for Signs
9
Projecting Sign
This is an attached sign which projects and has one end attached to
a building, and which does not employ ground support.
5.14 Design a projecting sign to be similar in character to
those seen traditionally.
• Design the sign bracket as a decorative or complementary
element of the sign. The bracket should appear as part of the
sign composition and design.
5.15 Projecting or blade signs may be considered.
• Locate small projecting signs near the business entrance, just
above the door or to the side of it.
• Mount moderately sized projecting signs higher on the building, Design the sign bracket as a
centered on the façade or positioned at the corner. decorative or complementary
• Small hanging signs are appropriate under a canopy on commercial element of the sign.
building types or from the inside of a porch on residential building
types.
Symbol Sign
This refers to a symbol displayed on a sign that portrays a certain
word, name, product or idea. This may be located on the interior of a
display window and may also be installed on an exterior façade.
5.16 Using a symbol for a sign is encouraged.
A symbol sign adds interest to the
• A symbol sign adds interest to the street, can be read quickly and
street, can be read quickly and
is often remembered better than written words. is often remembered better than
written words.
Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 107
10
Tenant or Directory Sign
A tenant panel or directory sign displays the tenant name and location
for a building containing multiple tenants.
5.17 Use a tenant panel or directory sign to consolidate small
individual signs on a larger building.
• Use a consolidated tenant panel or directory sign to help users
find building tenants.
• Locate a consolidated tenant panel or directory sign near a primary
entrance on the first floor wall of a building.
Interpretive Sign
An interpretive sign refers to a sign or group of signs that provide
information to visitors on natural, cultural and historic resources or
other pertinent information. An interpretive sign may be erected by a
Use a tenant panel or directory sign non-profit organization or may be a public sign erected by a national,
to consolidate small individual signs state or local government agency.
on a larger building.
Generally, interpretive signs should comply with the design guidelines
for the sign type that is the closest match. The guidelines below apply
to a common freestanding sign type.
5.18 Design an interpretive sign to be simple in character.
• The sign face should be easily read and viewed by pedestrians.
5.19 An interpretive sign should remain subordinate to its
context.
Design an interpretive sign to be
simple in character.
108 Chapter 5: Guidelines for Signs
11
Pole Mounted or Freestanding Sign
A pole mounted/freestanding sign is generally mounted on one or two
simple poles.
5.20 A pole sign should be appropriate to the context.
In a residential context:
• The top of the sign should not rise above the typical front porch
railing height of a traditional residential building.
• A double pole mounted sign or cantilevered sign is preferred.
In a commercial context:
• The top of the sign should not rise above the typical top of the
street level storefront of a traditional commercial building.
• Sign panels that stretch to the ground are inappropriate.
Ground or Monument Sign
These signs are low to the ground and are not attached to any part A pole sign should be appropriate to
of the buildings. the context.
5.21 Maintain the visual qualities and ambience of a building,
site and surrounding context when adding ground signage.
• Place ground mounted signs in a location that is readable from
the street and appropriate for the building and it surroundings.
• Design ground mounted signs to be subordinate in size to the
building and in scale with a building’s architectural elements.
• Do not design ground or monument signs to be so elaborate that
they replicate or upstage the architecture of a historic building
or its surroundings.
• When night time illumination is needed, use focused external
illumination, particularly in residential settings.
• Do not use internally lit plastic or plastic-looking boxes.
Maintain the visual qualities and
ambience of a building, site and
surrounding context when adding
ground signage.
Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 109
12
H I S T OR I C R E V I E W B OA R D
Applicant: You, Me & the Dog
Subject Property: 231 & 233 Main Street
Property Owner: Michael Chase
Tax Map # 020-02-01-014
Zoning District: Local Commercial, LC/Historic District
Zoning Case: 2022-254
REQUEST
The Planning Department has received an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from You,
Me & the Dog to install one wall sign, apply window signage, and change the color of the two doors at 231 &
233 Main Street.
SITE DESCRIPTION AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
This property is located within the downtown historic district and is listed on the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP). The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from the Historic Review Board
(HRB) to install one wall sign on the building facade, add window signage, and alter the color of the two doors
at 231 & 233 Main Street.
The Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines have schematic parameters for the implementation of signage.
These guidelines are attached. Generally, the historic district signage guidelines indicate that there should be clear
objectives established for the signage with limited impacts on defining features of a given building. If the subject
building has discernable locations of original signage, such areas should be targeted for new or updated signs.
The proposed signage should be compatible with the building and site. The impact on the overall area, including
adjacent structures, should also be considered.
Window signage should be designed to minimize the amount of window covered and be painted on the glass or
hung inside a window.
Additionally, the color palette that is preferred in The Fort Mill Historic District is of a traditional or historic feel.
If the historic color scheme is not known, then an interpretation of those on similar building is appropriate, matte
rather than high gloss paint finishes is preferred.
13
Each signage type and door color alteration as proposed will now be considered with respect to the town’s historic
district and zoning guidelines. The applicant has provided color renderings of the planned signage which are
included within the HRB packet.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
• The submitted wall sign drawing indicates a clear objective design in that discernable and appealing
typeface is used. Importantly, the impacts upon the building’s character defining features are certainly
limited.
• Additionally, the historic district guidelines indicate that the proposed location of this wall sign is
appropriate. Specifically, the illustrative drawing indicates that this wall sign would be placed over the
awning of the storefront area taking place of the current sign that is similar in design and size. Based on
the design of the façade, the historic district guidelines indicate that this section was in fact likely intended
as the signage location for this building.
• The proposed wall sign does fit the architecture and scale of the building. The submitted drawing
indicates that this sign is in the appropriate location on the façade and is designed to be compatible with
the building and surrounding businesses.
• The respective zoning regulations for such wall signs shall also be considered. Downtown Fort Mill has
the LC zoning designation. The town’s zoning ordinance indicates that a wall sign shall not exceed an
area equal to 15% of the area of the wall to which it is affixed. Thus, the wall sign as proposed consists
of approximately 31.2 square feet. This wall sign is within the parameters allowed.
• The proposed window signage will minimize the amount of window covered, situated primarily on the
border areas. Although the applicant plans to locate peel and stick signage and lettering on the exterior
of building windows, the planning staff recommends the material for the window signs to be of outdoor
grade to with stand UV damage and the elements.
• Applicant plans to change the color of the two doors that front Main Street. The color is a darker shade
of the current blue along with a matte finish which are consistent with the historic district’s preferred
historic or traditional palettes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant APPROVAL for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed
building improvements as submitted with the condition that the window signage material is of outdoor grade.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
H I S T OR I C R E V I E W B OA R D
Applicant: Sign Systems, Inc.
Subject Property: 134 N. White Street
Property Owner: L & C LAND HOLDINGS INC
Tax Map # 020-02-02-007
Zoning District: Local Commercial, LC/Historic District
Zoning Case: 2022-0255
REQUEST
The Town of Fort Mill Planning Department has received an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness
(COA) from Sign Systems, Inc. conveying a request to place one ground/monument sign at 134 N. White Street.
S I T E D E S C R I P T I ON A N D G E N E R A L C ON S T R U C T I ON P L A N
134 N. White Street is situated on the eastern corner of the intersection of N. White Street and Clebourne Street
and will be the property in which Fort Mill Pharmacy will occupy. This property falls within the Fort Mill Historic
Preservation Overlay District (HPOD). Though it is not located within the Town of Fort Mill’s Historic District
or on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the Historic Review Board (HRB) must review any
proposed changes to this property due to its location within the HPOD and must comply with the Fort Mill
Historic Preservation Ordinance and the corresponding design guidelines.
The proposal describes the installation of one double sided non-illuminated monument sign mounted on a brick
base fronting Clebourne Street.
H I S T OR I C D I S T R I C T D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S R E V I E W
The Town of Fort Mill Historic District Guidelines indicate that ground signs should maintain the visual
qualities and ambience of a building, site, and surrounding context in the following manner which the proposed
sign design qualifies to each:
• Place ground mounted signs in a location that is readable from the street and appropriate for the building
and its surroundings.
• Design ground mounted signs to be subordinate in size to the building and in scale with the building’s
architectural elements.
• Do not design ground or monument signs to be so elaborate that they replicate or upstage the architecture
of a historic building or its surroundings.
26
• When night-time illumination is needed, use focused external illumination.
• Do not use internally lit plastic or plastic-looking boxes.
Z ON I N G G U I D E L I N E S R E V I E W
The allowances for ground signs per the Town of Fort Mill Zoning Ordinance and the corresponding design for
this sign are noted below:
HEIGHT
• Maximum permitted height for a ground sign: Eight (8) feet
• Proposed height of the ground sign: Six (6) feet
NUMBER OF GROUND SIGNS
• Maximum number of ground signs: One (1) for each street frontage.
• Number of proposed ground signs for the respective street frontage: One (1)
MAXIMUM AREA
• Maximum square footage for a non-illuminated, ground sign: Eighty (80) square feet
• Proposed square footage for this non-illuminated, ground sign: 21.32 square feet
MINIMUM SETBACK
• Minimum setback required for a ground sign: Fifteen (15) feet from any property line and/or three (3)
feet from any right-of-way.
• Proposed setback for this ground sign: Three (3) feet from the street right-of-way.
ADVERTISING MESSAGE
• Letters, symbols, and graphics of a ground sign should not occupy more than 40% of the total sign area.
• The lettering of this proposed ground sign, which includes approximately 8.16 square feet, occupies
approximately 38% of the total sign area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant APPROVAL for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed
ground sign at 134 N. White Street.
27
28
29
30
31
32
Get email alerts for Fort Mill
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.