Historic Review Board

HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD MEETING 112 Confedera te S tree t September 13th, 2022 4:30 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. HRB Meeting: August 9th, 2022 [Pages 2 - 5] OLD BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) [Pages 6 -24] Applicant Name: Shanon Little (You, Me, & The Dog) Owner Name: Michael W. Chase Property Address: 231/233 Main Street Purpose: Certificate of Appropriateness request for proposed wall sign, window signage, and change in exterior door color. Property information: Town of Fort Mill Historic Preservation District LC, Local Commercial Zoning District NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) [Pages 25 - 30] Applicant Name: Lisa Edwards (1% Lists) Owner Name: Absobeauty, LLC Property Address: 118 Main Street Purpose: Certificate of Appropriateness request for proposed projecting sign Property information: Town of Fort Mill Historic Preservation District LC, Local Commercial Zoning District ADJOURN The following press was notified of the meeting by email or fax in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act: The Herald; CN2; WRHI; Fort Mill Times, and WBTV. The agenda was also posted at the entrance to Town Hall the required length of time and on the Town website. The Town of Fort Mill is committed to assuring accessibility with reasonable accommodation, of Town services and facilities for all individuals, in compliance with federal law. Please contact the Town Manager’s Office at 803-547-2116 if you need assistance. 1  MINUTES TOWN OF FORT MILL HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD August 9th, 2022 112 Confederate Street 4:30 PM Present: Chairman Louis Roman, Megan Brinton, Scott Couchenour, Elizabeth Leventis, Jessica Scarlett, Nikki Todaro, Planning Director Penelope Karagounis, Senior Planner Alex Moore Absent: David Booth Guests: Trisha James, CJ Hines, Amy Dellinger CALL TO ORDER Chairman Louis Roman called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Louis Roman entertained a motion to approve the minutes from the June 14th, 2022, HRB meeting. Elizabeth Leventis made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Scott Couchenour seconded the motion to approve the minutes. The minutes were then approved by a vote of 6-0. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) Since the applicant for the first item on the agenda was not in attendance at the meeting, Planning Director Penelope Karagounis requested that Chairman Louis Roman reverse the items on the HRB agenda so that the case involving a request for a certificate of appropriateness for a proposed ground sign to be placed at 134 North White Street be heard first. Senior Planner Moore then provided an outline of request which included a COA application for a proposed ground sign to be located at 134 North White Street. Moore stated the proposed sign would be an on-premises ground sign for Fort Mill Pharmacy which would occupy the existing building at 134 White Street. He noted that the application indicated that This property is located at 134 N. White Street and is located within the town’s historic district. The application showed the proposed installation of one double-sided, non-illuminated monument sign mounted on a brick base fronting Clebourne Street. Moore then stated that the town’s historic district guidelines indicate that ground signs should maintain the visual qualities and ambience of a building, site, and surrounding context in the following manner: 2  i. Ground signs should be placed in a location that is readable from the street and appropriate for the building and its surroundings. ii. Ground signs should be subordinate in size to the building and in scale with the building’s architectural elements. iii. Ground signs should be designed to not be so elaborate that they replicate or upstage the architecture of a historic building or its surroundings. iv. Only external illumination shall be used. v. Do not use internally lit plastic or plastic looking boxes Moore then presented the specific zoning requirements for a ground sign. i. The maximum height of a ground sign is 8’. The proposed ground sign is 6’ in height. ii. The maximum number of ground signs per street frontage is one. They propose one sign on the Clebourne Street frontage. iii. The maximum square footage for a non-illuminated ground sign is 80 square feet. This sign is proposed to be 21.32 square feet. iv. The minimum setback requirement for a ground sign is 15’ from a property line and/or 3’ from the edge of the right-of-way. v. The advertising message for such a sign should not occupy more than 40% of the total sign area. The advertising message of this sign proposes an area of approximately 8.16 square feet which comprises 38% of the signage area. Senior Planner Moore then stated that Fort Mill Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant approval for a certificate of appropriateness for the proposed ground sign as submitted. Megan Brinton then asked if the sign base was already in place. Moore responded that the sign base had not been placed on the property yet but that there was a temporary sign located on the property. Megan Brinton then asked if the brick on the sign would match the building. Moore responded that the sign was designed so the brick on the sign would match that of the building. Megan Brinton then asked if there were plans for up-lighting of the sign. Moore responded that he knew of no intention at this time to provide signage up-lighting. Scott Couchenour asked if SCDOT had completed their project at the intersection of North White Street and Clebourne Street. Planning Director Karagounis stated that SCDOT had indeed completed this project. Scott Couchenour then asked if the town requires an address to be placed on such signs as that being proposed. Senior Planner Alex Moore responded that he was not aware of such a requirement but that he would check on this. There being no further questions or comments, Chairman Roman entertained a motion. Scott Couchenour made a motion that the request for a certificate of appropriateness for the ground sign be approved as submitted. Jessica Scartlett seconded the motion. 3 Then, by a vote of 6-0, the HRB approved the ground sign as presented for 134 North White Street. 2. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) The second item on the agenda included a request from Shanon Little for a certificate of appropriateness for a wall sign, window signage, and a change of paint colors for the building located at 231 Main Street. Senior Planner Moore presented the information pertaining to this request. The applicant is “You, Me, & the Dog” represented by the business owner, Shanon Little. Moore presented the historic district guidelines which would pertain to the project proposal: 1. This property is located at 231 & 233 Main Street. It is located within the historic district and is also listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 2. The town’s historic district guidelines indicate that there should be clear objectives for signage with limited impacts on defining features of a given building. 3. Window signage should be designed to minimize the amount of window covered and be painted on the glass or hung inside a window. 4. Regarding the proposed color change on the doors, the historic district guidelines indicated that the preferred color palette in Fort Mill is that which promotes a traditional or historic feel. Moore then presented the specific proposals as submitted: 1. Wall Sign: The wall sign as proposed does indicate a clear objective design and the impacts on the upon the building’s character defining features are limited. Further, the location of the proposed wall sign is appropriate, and it fits the architecture and scale of the building. Additionally, this proposed wall sign meets the town’s zoning requirements in that it does not exceed 15% of the façade area. 2. Window Signage: The proposed window signage is shown on page 24 and page 24 of the packet. Although the applicant plans to place peel-and-stick lettering on the exterior of the windows, staff recommends that these stickers be of outdoor-grade if placed on the exterior. 3. Door Color: The applicant proposes to change the color of the two doors that front Main Street. The color would be a darker shade of the current blue, indicated to be “coastal blue” per page 21 of the packet, with a matte finish. This color would be consistent with the historic district guidelines. Moore concluded his presentation by stating that planning staff recommended that that the HRB grant approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the improvements as presented with the condition that the window signage material be of outdoor grade. Planning Director Karagounis then interjected that people get caught up on the “cuteness” of fonts on signage. She indicated that this would make the wall sign font difficult to read from Main Street with the “me” in “You, Me and the Dog” looking like “the.” Elizabeth Leventis then stated that she had the same immediate reaction regarding the signage. She also noted that the window signage was not consistent. Senior Planner Moore then noted that the board could make it a condition that the branding of the business be consistent. 4 Elizabeth Leventis then stated that she would like to have a better drawing illustrating the proposed window signage. Nikki Todaro then stated that the proposed copy as presented for the windows would cover a good deal of the window. Moore then asked the HRB if they wished for this proposal to come back to them for further review or if they would like for staff to handle this administratively. Chairman Roman then asked if there had been any discussion about the upper windows in this building as they are currently boarded up. Planning Director Karagounis then noted that if opportunities arose then town council wanted boarded up windows in the downtown area to be opened. However, she also noted that this applicant does not own this building. Chairman Roman then stated that the proposed “coastal blue” color on the doors was within the parameters of what the HRB was looking to see, but that perhaps there could be opportunity for also upgrading the existing awning on this building. Chairman Roman then indicated that it would be necessary to determine whether they wished to approve the submittal with conditions and allow staff to handle it or if HRB deemed it necessary for the applicant to be present at a meeting to present changes as recommended. The HRB indicated that they wished for the applicant to come back to them with changes as discussed. Chairman Roman then entertained a motion for deferral on the agenda item. Scott Couchenour made a motion that action on the item be deferred until the next called meeting. Chairman Roman then asked for clarification from Alex Moore on the items which were to be addressed by the applicant at the next called meeting. Moore then stated that the following items needed to be addressed by the applicant and reviewed by HRB: 1. The applicant needs to submit a true and accurate schematic of the proposed window signage. 2. All business branding must match with readable font used. 3. The paint used on the doors must be suitable for outdoor use. 4. A swatch sample indicating that the paint used on the doors will match the color of the awning. 5. The possibility of the currently boarded, upper story windows being restored (suggestion only). Megan Brinton then seconded the motion. Then, by a vote of 6-0, the HRB approved the item’s deferral to the next scheduled meeting with the conditions as noted. There being no other business, Chairman Roman adjourned the meeting at 5:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Alex J. Moore, AICP Senior Planner August 31st, 2022 5  H I S T OR I C R E V I E W B OA R D Applicant: You, Me & the Dog Subject Property: 231 & 233 Main Street Property Owner: Michael Chase Tax Map # 020-02-01-014 Zoning District: Local Commercial, LC/Historic District Zoning Case: 2022-254 REQUEST The Planning Department received an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from You, Me & the Dog to install one wall sign, apply window signage, and change the color of the two doors at 231 & 233 Main Street. This request was initially heard by the Town of Fort Mill Historic Review Board (HRB) on August 9th, 2022. However, the HRB chose to defer the request to the next scheduled meeting on September 13th, 2022, in order to receive additional information from the applicant. SITE DESCRIPTION AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This property is located within the downtown historic district and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from the Historic Review Board (HRB) to install one wall sign on the building facade, add window signage, and alter the color of the two doors at 231 & 233 Main Street. The Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines have schematic parameters for the implementation of signage. These guidelines are attached. Generally, the historic district signage guidelines indicate that there should be clear objectives established for the signage with limited impacts on defining features of a given building. If the subject building has discernable locations of original signage, such areas should be targeted for new or updated signs. The proposed signage should be compatible with the building and site. The impact on the overall area, including adjacent structures, should also be considered. Window signage should be designed to minimize the amount of window covered and be painted on the glass or hung inside a window. Additionally, the color palette that is preferred in The Fort Mill Historic District is of a traditional or historic feel. If the historic color scheme is not known, then an interpretation of those on similar building is appropriate, matte rather than high gloss paint finishes is preferred. 6 Each signage type and door color alteration as proposed will now be considered with respect to the town’s historic district and zoning guidelines. As noted within the request section above, the below discussion will reflect updated information provided by the applicant at the request of the HRB. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS • The revised, submitted wall sign drawing (attached) indicates a clear objective design that reflects an improved font and branding design. The impacts upon the building’s character defining features will remain limited. • Additionally, the historic district guidelines indicate that the proposed location of this wall sign is appropriate. Specifically, the illustrative drawing indicates that this wall sign would be placed over the awning of the storefront area taking place of the current sign that is similar in design and size. Based on the design of the façade, the historic district guidelines indicate that this section was in fact likely intended as the signage location for this building. • The proposed wall sign does fit the architecture and scale of the building. The submitted drawing indicates that this sign is in the appropriate location on the façade and is designed to be compatible with the building and surrounding businesses. • The respective zoning regulations for such wall signs shall also be considered. Downtown Fort Mill has the LC zoning designation. The town’s zoning ordinance indicates that a wall sign shall not exceed an area equal to 15% of the area of the wall to which it is affixed. Thus, the wall sign as proposed consists of approximately 31.2 square feet. This wall sign is within the parameters allowed. • The revised, submitted window signage drawing (attached) indicates a reduced coverage area as compared to the first iteration. It should be noted, however, that the font as presented on the wall sign and that on the window sign continue to deviate. • The applicant has revised the proposed color of the two doors that front Main Street to “Retreat,” Link: Retreat HGSW6207 Color Chip | Hgsw (hgtvhomebysherwinwilliams.com) A chip sample for this is located within the HRB packet. • Additionally, the applicant has proposed a “second choice” color for these doors. The proposed second choice color is “Destiny,” Link: Destiny HGSW6274 Color Chip | Hgsw (hgtvhomebysherwinwilliams.com) A chip sample for this color is also located within the HRB packet. • Finally, the applicant is also now proposing that trump l’oeil (illustrative faux door) be approved as part of this project. On July 10th, 2018, the HRB, per a COA request submitted by Olive’s Mud Puddle, approved the trump l’oeil as part of an application for façade improvements. While HRB did provide their consent for this trump l’oeil to be installed, the proprietor of Olive’s Mud Puddle determined not to include this within the upgrades at that time. Thus, if the current applicant wishes to now have this trump 7  l’oeil installed, HRB must again review and approve the proposal. Included within the packet are both the drawing of the trump l’oeil as approved in 2018 along with a photo of the trump l’oeil as constructed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant APPROVAL for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed building improvements as submitted with the following conditions. The HRB may include additional conditions as they deem necessary. 1. All branding as shown on the wall sign and the window signage, including font, shall match. 2. The new color of the doors shall be “Destiny,” and shall be of an exterior grade. ATTACHMENTS • Historic District Signage Guidelines • Revised HRB Application • Revised Drawings 8  iÈ}˜Ո`iˆ˜iÃvœÀ iÜ>˜`œ`ˆwi`-ˆ}˜Ã Signs are used to identify the location of a business and attract customers. Signs should be both integral to a building’s design and noticeable to customers. When planning signage for a building: Establish objectives for signage Signage should provide clear, legible information about a business while also appealing to prospective customers. A signage plan should demonstrate forethought in the design, size, placement and graphic format of each sign to ensure an integrated signage strategy and design. Every proposed sign should have a purpose. Limit impacts on character-defining features 6LJQDJHVKRXOGSURYLGHFOHDU A building’s historic architecture, such as its pilasters and decorative OHJLEOHLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWDEXVLQHVV banding, is important to protect. These features may also be a major ZKLOHDOVRDSSHDOLQJWRSURVSHFWLYH draw to customers and provide a unique business identity. Plan signage FXVWRPHUV to highlight, rather than cover or physically impact, these elements. Find original sign locations on a building Step back and examine a building from across the street. Does it have a recessed or framed horizontal band over the storefront or below the roof parapet? Does the building have large shop windows? Many historic and even modern buildings are designed with sign bands. Similarly, large shop windows were intended for pedestrian-scale advertising. Use of these originally designed sign spaces will ensure that new signage $SSURSULDWHO\SODFHGDQGVL]HG is well integrated into a building’s architecture. VLJQDJHFUDIWHGRIGXUDEOH PDWHULDOVFDQUHLQIRUFHWKH DUFKLWHFWXUHRIDKLVWRULFEXLOGLQJ Ensure sign compatibility with building and site DQGLWVVXUURXQGLQJVDQGDWWUDFW Consider what type and size of signage would best fit the architecture FXVWRPHUV and scale of a historic building. What signage would best relate to a building’s original vertical and horizontal patterns? Are the proposed signs made of high quality materials that correspond with the building and its surroundings? Appropriately placed and sized signage, crafted of durable materials, can reinforce the architecture of a historic building and its surroundings, and attract customers. Conversely, maximizing signage may often lead to visual clutter that does not promote business activity. $SSURSULDWHO\SODFHGDQGVL]HG Consider impacts on the block VLJQDJHFUDIWHGRIGXUDEOH Is the building located in a historic district next to other historic PDWHULDOVFDQUHLQIRUFHWKH buildings? Is the building in a residential setting? Consider placing DUFKLWHFWXUHRIDKLVWRULFEXLOGLQJ DQGLWVVXUURXQGLQJVDQGDWWUDFW signs at the same height and similar façade locations as adjacent FXVWRPHUV commercial buildings to provide an integrated block appearance. When located next to residential uses, consider the visual impact, as well as the potential “light spray” impacts, of signage. Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 101 9  Create graphic interest A generic sign box does little to acknowledge a business’ location in a unique historic district or on a historic landmark site. Ensure that any proposed signage lives up to its historic landmark or district location, and is distinctive. In most cases, this translates into signage that is creative and visually interesting, providing pedestrians with a sense of curiosity and delight. Sign Character A new sign should be in character with the materials, colors and details of the building. The integration of the sign with the building or building façade is important and should be a key factor in its design (QFRXUDJHVLJQDJHWKDWLVFUHDWLYH and installation. DQGYLVXDOO\LQWHUHVWLQJSURYLGLQJ SHGHVWULDQVZLWKDVHQVHRI FXULRVLW\DQGGHOLJKW 5.3 A sign should be subordinate to the overall building composition. ‡ Design a sign to be simple in character. ‡ Scale a sign to fit with the façade of the building. ‡ Locate a sign to emphasize design elements of the façade Itself. ‡ Mount a sign to fit within existing architectural features using the shape of the sign to help reinforce the horizontal lines of the building. ‡ Rooftop, animated and message board signs are inappropriate. Sign Content $VLPSOHVLJQGHVLJQLVSUHIHUUHG Sign content should be designed to be visually interesting and clearly legible. 5.4 A simple sign design is preferred. ‡ Typefaces that are in keeping with those seen in the area traditionally are encouraged. ‡ Avoid hard-to-read or overly intricate typeface styles. 102 Chapter 5: Guidelines for Signs 10 Sign Lighting The sign illumination source should be shielded to minimize glare. Light intensity should not overpower the building or street edge. Small and discreet modern light fittings may provide an unobtrusive alternative to traditionally styled lamp units. 5.5 Use shielded lighting source on a sign. ‡ Directing lighting at signage from an external, shielded lamp is appropriate. ‡ A warm light, similar to daylight, is appropriate. ‡ Strobe lighting is not appropriate. ‡ Internal illumination is not appropriate. 8VHVKLHOGHGOLJKWLQJVRXUFHRQD VLJQ 5.6 Silhouette lighting may provide an effective and subtle form of lighting which can be used to accentuate both sign and building. ‡ This form of lighting can be used with either wall or sign panels or individual letters. ‡ The light source should not be visible. Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 103 11  Sign Installation The installation of a sign is an integral aspect in the retention of key architectural features and in minimizing damage to the building. 5.7 Avoid damaging or obscuring architectural details or features when installing signs. ‡ Minimize the number of anchor points on the wall when feasible. Sign Materials A sign should exhibit qualities of style, permanence and compatibility with the natural and built environment. 5.8 Use sign materials that are compatible with the building façade and site. ‡ Use colors, materials and details that are compatible with the overall character of the façade. ‡ Permanent, durable materials that reflect the Fort Mill context are encouraged. ‡ Avoid highly reflective materials. Sign Color Color should be used both to accentuate the sign design and message and also to integrate the sign or lettering with the building and its context. $YRLGGDPDJLQJRUREVFXULQJ 5.9 Use colors for the sign that are generally compatible DUFKLWHFWXUDOGHWDLOVRUIHDWXUHV with those of the building front. ZKHQLQVWDOOLQJVLJQV ‡ Limit the number of colors used on a sign. In general, no more than three colors should be used, although accent colors may also be appropriate. Use colors for the sign that are JHQHUDOO\FRPSDWLEOHZLWKWKRVHRI WKHEXLOGLQJIURQW 104 Chapter 5: Guidelines for Signs 12 Appropriate Sign Types Sign types that are considered generally to be appropriate are defined here. While selecting a sign, an important design principle to consider is that signs should not overwhelm the architecture of the building. Consistent placement of signs according to building style, type, size, location and materials creates a sense of visual continuity. Awnings or Canopy Sign This is a sign located on the face of a canopy or awning. 5.10 A sign located on or under a canopy or awning may be considered. ‡ These are most appropriate in areas with high pedestrian use. ‡ Consider sign lettering centered on a building canopy where a flush-mounted sign would obscure architectural details. $ZQLQJDQGFDQRS\VLJQVDUHPRVW DSSURSULDWHLQDUHDVZLWKKLJK SHGHVWULDQXVH &RQVLGHUVLJQOHWWHULQJFHQWHUHGRQDEXLOGLQJFDQRS\ZKHUHDÀXVK PRXQWHGVLJQZRXOGREVFXUHDUFKLWHFWXUDOGHWDLOV Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 105 13  Window Sign This is a sign painted on the surface of, or located on the interior of, a display window. 5.11 Design a window sign to: ‡ Minimize the amount of window covered. ‡ Be painted on the glass or hung inside a window. Wall Sign This is an attached sign painted on or attached to the wall or surface of 'HVLJQDZLQGRZVLJQWRPLQLPL]H a building or display surface which is parallel to the supporting surface. WKHDPRXQWRIZLQGRZFRYHUHG 5.12 Flush mounted wall signs may be considered. ‡ Place wall signs to align with nearby buildings. ‡ Determine if decorative moldings exist that could define a sign panel. If so, locate a flush-mounted wall sign to fit within a panel formed by moldings or transom panels. ‡ Do not obstruct character-defining features of a building with signage. 'HVLJQDZLQGRZVLJQWREHSDLQWHG RQWKHJODVVRUKXQJLQVLGHD 5.13 Design a wall sign to minimize the depth of a sign panel ZLQGRZ or letters. ‡ A wall sign should be relatively flush with the building façade. ‡ Design a wall sign to sit within, rather than forward of, the fascia or other architectural details of the building. 'HVLJQDZDOOVLJQWRPLQLPL]HWKH GHSWKRIDVLJQSDQHORUOHWWHUV $ZDOOVLJQVKRXOGEHUHODWLYHO\ÀXVK ZLWKWKHEXLOGLQJIDoDGH 106 Chapter 5: Guidelines for Signs 14 15 Page 2 of 2 Date Received: Historic Review Board Date: :;ao ~2. ~ Explanation of Work: Please use the area below to provide a detailed explanation of the proposed work. When explaining the work, please provide information on the design, materials, colors, as well as installation/construction procedures. For example, when applying fur a wall sign please provide detail on the design of the sign, what materials will be used, what colors will be used, and how will the sign will be affixed to the wall. Please attach continuation sheets as needed. 'Si @~fl§e - r.+ vUIII be, aJ~wm "'lP: Co/or0 /M l, lo\gcJ;Q.f\d wh , ±£✓• The. ~-½jn wtl\ bu \V)::s¼Me.d w,tn tl~1T0 J<- over-the e.y.,'.:,tir13 u:tvJoP1-1 tz,-tv\{, bi,Cf- wa.u cl: l'.lM.ldi~ . Jill exis+ivi~ S\~v'\ w\ l l {Qt, ~DJLct . Y\GruJe,,2 fo \\ avJ J>axs - RCY\+t - i ~<Lf.2 da:rwa,u s ±:o be fUA0t~J lLll &en+ ~ .? ca.Uul ~ ld.kl-e... }>1ctlu:e.s ::fu l\o 4\ ck \ · u;, ~ vS\<\clow s ·1I'\ II\Jk1+e. ::Ill✓ words e., N I \ I ~o:t-e.. -th~\ t(Yl5 1: Cll.v (lJ! I I'\ \'IA'--( sbre.. . K clu.xl5 -fu\ \orJ. Acknowledgement of Requirements: The applicant acknowledges that the information provided is complete and that any exterior modification, except for ordinary maintenance or repair (not involving change in design, material, color, or outer appearance), shatl not commence until the Historic Review Board approves the specific modification through a Certificate of Appropriateness. Additional permitting may be required prior to beginning work, including zoning review, stormwater/engineering review, building permitting, and business licensing. Please note, e submissions will not be accepted. Date P.O. BOX 159 • 200 TOM HALL STREET • FORT Mil.L, SC 29715 16 • FAX (803) 547-2126 TELEPHONE (803) 547-2034  Revised Colors for Sept. 13th, 2022 HRB Meeting Lo�e,S I , s t - - (h)tce; 5� \n w �\\\ \ (MY\S o n n u.u door- Col ov- t�W10Y- �l 'lrt:1 - - ChoiC� OY\ Y\.UO doo<cdif DESTINY HGSW6274 17 lTY: 1 �on-Lite Pan Sign icale: NTS You, Me & the Dog 231 MolnStreet FortMIII ' . Shannon UttJe ,., Iii:'\=• Franklin Starnes I I Franklin Starnes ILICTIIC I \:Y - (1911111111 lUCTIJCAl ILlMUrtn ro .. lfrfJTA.I .. _,.....,,,,1111_ ARTICLE r,no 01' 1"I NA110NAL IIICINCAL COOi Al ..... OTlllll�l«AI.- ntlllNCI, ____ 01'11111 11,f,191k-1>loolUitoblolo, �� Wit THE DIJITEN1S OF THIS DIUW1NQ MD El.eMl!llll ARE NOT TO IIE Rfl'RCHJl CHAN8ED, OR IXHl811'£D TD AN\ OUT81DE OF 'IOUR COMMNV IN WI OIi iii PM! Wffll0UT WRITIBI PUIIIIII ALL 800H ACllON8 ARE l'tlOHtlfTED IY o 20151111!1 ......... ,20 YOl.'B-- I\PP/IUVED BY 1/, DA TE: Specifications: 2" Deep Aluminum Pan Original Wall Sign Submittal from August 9th, 2022 HRB Meeting To Replace Exclstlng Sign above Awning XNwn:nrnal\DCAOC:C"Pl"rwran,t&I ltCCnt.MV 1NltAI .-rwnoc:macrl"WCIOMSnOOlnOTnCAINtlt"ATIIW\ 18 .....  I -t --- l� ___ u -----,r ....,___ \4'L _,._..___ ___,f . l Si�' taek�d : N\"{t\-e; \d\tr"1� � \?orde.r: bloW-- Revised Wall Sign Submittal for Sept. 13th, 2022 HRB Meeting 19  -- i I \ ' l I f I I I \ - •- - I l Original Window Sign Submittal for August 9th, 2022 HRB Meeting 20  Ll---y --- 95 -- --.rt -r 1-------t--if-----l--r��--L-....J T 2f �����=,---1:::::=-I ���;c:;i 24 J_ .J Revised Window Sign Submittal for Sept. 13th, 2022 HRB Meeting 21 / ) 22  Proposed Trump L'oeil (faux door) 23 24  H I S T OR I C R E V I E W B OA R D Applicant: Lisa Edwards Subject Property: 118 Main Street Property Owner: Absobeauty, LLC Tax Map # 020-02-08-012 Zoning District: Local Commercial, LC/Historic District Zoning Case: 2022-0576 REQUEST The Planning Department has received an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from Lisa Edwards, the proprietor of the business located at 118 Main Street. Ms. Edwards is proposing to place a projecting sign at this location in association with her business. The drawing for the proposed sign is attached. SITE DESCRIPTION AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This property is located within the downtown historic district, but it is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from the Historic Review Board (HRB) to install one projecting sign on the façade of the building. The Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines have schematic parameters for the implementation of projecting signage. These guidelines are attached. Generally, the historic district signage guidelines indicate that there should be clear objectives established for the signage with limited impacts on defining features of a given building. If the subject building has discernable locations of original signage, such areas should be targeted for new or updated signs. The proposed signage should be compatible with the building and site. The impact on the overall area, including adjacent structures, should also be considered. Internal illumination of signage is not permitted within the Town of Fort Mill Historic District. Signage within the historic district may incorporate external lighting directed toward the sign from an external shielded lamp. The projecting sign as proposed will now be considered with respect to the town’s historic district and zoning guidelines. 25  PROJECTING SIGN • The drawing as submitted for the projecting sign indicates a clear objective in that discernable and appealing graphics are used. Importantly, the impacts upon the building’s character defining features are certainly limited. • Additionally, the historic district guidelines indicate that the proposed location of this projecting sign on the façade is appropriate. The applicant notes on the submitted application that the existing sign bracket will be used. The sign bracketing will be supplemented with the new signage and be placed in the same location as it has been previously. Thus, this projecting sign would be placed above the entrance. • The proposed projecting sign does fit the architecture and scale of the building. As noted above, the submitted drawing indicates that this projecting sign is in the appropriate location on the façade. • This projecting sign, as designed, will be compatible with the building and surrounding businesses. • The respective zoning regulations for such wall signs shall also be considered. Downtown Fort Mill has the LC zoning designation. The town’s zoning ordinance indicates that a projecting sign shall not exceed an area of 12 square feet and may not extend more than three feet from the façade. The proposed projecting sign consists of 4.17 square feet (based on the area of an oval), and it will extend three feet from the façade. • Additionally, the town’s building code indicates that a projecting sign must be placed so that the bottom of the sign is located at least eight feet above the sidewalk. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant APPROVAL for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed projecting sign as submitted. ATTACHMENTS • Historic District Signage Guidelines for Projecting Signs • HRB Application • Projecting Sign Drawing 26 Projecting Sign This is an attached sign which projects and has one end attached to a building, and which does not employ ground support. 5.14 Design a projecting sign to be similar in character to those seen traditionally. • Design the sign bracket as a decorative or complementary element of the sign. The bracket should appear as part of the sign composition and design. 5.15 Projecting or blade signs may be considered. • Locate small projecting signs near the business entrance, just above the door or to the side of it. • Mount moderately sized projecting signs higher on the building, Design the sign bracket as a centered on the façade or positioned at the corner. decorative or complementary • Small hanging signs are appropriate under a canopy on commercial element of the sign. building types or from the inside of a porch on residential building types. 27 28 29 30