Historic Review Board

HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD MEETING 112 Confedera te S tree t October 11th, 2022 4:30 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. HRB Meeting: September 13th, 2022 [Pages 2 - 5] NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) [Pages 6 -19] Applicant Name: Mark Kurowski (Miaxelan 235 LLC) Owner Name: Miaxelan 235 LLC Property Address: 217 Main Street Purpose: Certificate of Appropriateness request for proposed projecting sign, exterior color change, new awning, and exterior repair. Property Information: Town of Fort Mill Historic Preservation District LC, Local Commercial Zoning District INFORMATION ONLY [Pages 20-24] 1. Certified Local Government (CLG) Evaluation for the Fort Mill Historic District from South Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SCSHPO). This evaluation includes the following years: FY 16-17 to FY 20-21. ADJOURN The following press was notified of the meeting by email or fax in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act: The Herald; CN2; WRHI; Fort Mill Times, and WBTV. The agenda was also posted at the entrance to Town Hall the required length of time and on the Town website. The Town of Fort Mill is committed to assuring accessibility with reasonable accommodation, of Town services and facilities for all individuals, in compliance with federal law. Please contact the Town Manager’s Office at 803-547-2116 if you need assistance. 1  MINUTES TOWN OF FORT MILL HISTORIC REVIEW BOARD September 13th, 2022 112 Confederate Street 4:30 PM Present: Chairman Louis Roman, David Booth, Megan Brinton, Scott Couchenour, Elizabeth Leventis, Planner I Tim Kramer, Senior Planner Alex Moore Absent: Jessica Scarlett, Niki Todaro, Planning Director Penelope Karagounis Guests: Shanon Little, Helen Stewart, Lisa Edwards CALL TO ORDER Chairman Louis Roman called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Louis Roman entertained a motion to approve the minutes from the August 9th, 2022, HRB meeting. Elizabeth Leventis made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. David Booth seconded the motion to approve the minutes. The minutes were then approved by a vote of 5-0. OLD BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) Senior Planner Moore provided an overview of this request. This request for a certificate of appropriateness initially came before the HRB on Tuesday August 9th, 2022. At that meeting, the HRB voted to defer action on the COA so that additional information could be provided by the applicant. This request included: (1) A true and accurate schematic of the proposed window signage; (2) Uniform business branding; (3) Paint samples indicating suitability for outdoor use; (4) A swatch sample indicating that the paint used on the doors will match the color of the awning; (5) The possibility of the currently boarded, upper story windows being restored. However, this was more of a suggestion as the HRB discussion indicated that their wish for the applicant not to be held up due to this. To that end, the applicant has provided additional information beginning on page 17 of the HRB packet with the revised, proposed color scheme. Then, on page 19 you have the revised wall sign submittal. Page 2 21 includes the revised window sign submittal. Note the original sticker sample. Additionally, as noted within the application information, the applicant is now proposing the inclusion of a trompe’ l’oeil. See pages 22 and 23 of the HRB packet. A trompe’ l’oeil is a visual illusion in art, which is supposed to result in the eye perceiving the painted detail as three dimensional. This particular artistic piece was approved in July 2018 for Olive’s Mud Puddle located immediately next door at 229 Main Street. The HRB approved the drawing as shown on page 23. The current applicant has now provided the drawing as shown on page 24. This is the finished drawing. However, this particular item was not provided to HRB in July 2018. The staff recommendation is that HRB grant approval for the proposed improvements as submitted with the condition that all branding as shown on the wall sign window signage shall match and that the new color of the exterior doors be “Destiny” and be of exterior grade. The HRB may include additional conditions as they deem necessary. Chairman Roman then gave opportunity to Ms. Shanon Little to speak to the HRB regarding her project. Ms. Little went over the revised information. She noted that the current front door consisted of royal blue and that the existing awning color consisted of “Loyal Blue” as the submitted swatch sample indicated. She then stated that she wished to do either the “Retreat” color or “Destiny” color for the front door. These colors were also submitted as swatch samples within the revised information. Additionally, Ms. Little presented the proposed, revised window signage, wall signage, and trompe l’oeil. She also noted that she intended to work with the property owner to try and influence him to open the boarded, upper windows. Ms. Little indicated that if the owner did become amenable to this portion of façade improvement, it would occur later. The HRB indicated that they really liked the revisions that Ms. Little had made to her certificate of appropriateness (COA) application since the initial meeting in August. Megan Brinton moved to approve the revised COA application as submitted. Elizabeth Leventis seconded the motion with the condition that the revised color scheme for the exterior doors could include either the applicant’s 1st or 2nd color choice. By a vote of 5-0, the HRB then voted to approve the revised COA application with the condition that the revised color scheme for the exterior doors could include either the applicant’s 1st or 2nd color choice. 3 NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) Senior Planner Moore provided an overview of this request. The applicant is Lisa Edwards of 1% Lists Advantage. The building is located at 118 Main Street and is located within the downtown historic district. This building is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The applicant is proposing the installation of a new projecting sign at this location. Generally, the historic district guidelines indicate that there should be clear objectives established for the signage with limited impacts on defining features of a given building. With this proposed sign, the submitted drawing indicates the sign has a clear advertising objective in that discernable and clear graphics are used. The proposed location on the façade of the building is appropriate. The existing sign bracketing will be used for this sign, and the signage system will be placed in the same location that has been used previously. The town’s zoning ordinance indicates that a projecting sign shall not exceed an area of 12 square feet and may not extend more than three feet from the façade. The proposed projecting sign consists of 4.17 square feet, and it will extend three feet from the façade. Additionally, the town’s building code indicates that a projecting sign must be placed so that the bottom of the sign is located at least eight feet above the sidewalk. Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant APPROVAL for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed projecting sign as submitted. Chairman Louis Roman then asked the applicant if she had any comments. Ms. Lisa Edwards noted that she bought the 1% Lists Advantage franchise for this area. She stated that the red and blue as shown on the proposed sign were the primary franchise colors. The sign would be of the same dimensions as the previous projecting sign at this location. Chairman Roman asked HRB members if they had any questions about the application. There being none, he then entertained a motion. Elizabeth Leventis made a motion to approve the COA application. David Booth seconded the motion. Then, by a vote of 5-0 the HRB approved the certificate of appropriateness. There being no other business on the agenda, Chairman Roman briefly noted that the South Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SCSHPO) had recently given the town a designation of “satisfactory.” This designation means that the town is meeting its responsibilities as being one of 36 local governments in the 4 state to achieve Certified Local Government (CLG) status. This evaluation includes the years FY 16-17 to FY 20-21. Chairman Roman then adjourned the meeting at 4:47 PM. Respectfully submitted, Alex J. Moore, AICP Senior Planner September 28th, 2022 5  H I S T OR I C R E V I E W B OA R D Applicant: Mark Kurowski Subject Property: 217 Main Street Property Owner: Miaxelan 235 LLC Tax Map # 020-02-01-007 Zoning District: Local Commercial, LC/Historic District Zoning Case: 2022-0707 REQUEST The Planning Department received an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) from Mark Kurowski, the owner of 217 Main Street, for the following improvements: 1. A new projecting sign 2. A new awning 3. New exterior, paint colors 4. Repair of minor masonry issues on rear elevation of building SITE DESCRIPTION AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This property is located within the downtown historic district and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The building was constructed in circa 1900 and once was known as Frosty Witherspoon’s Men’s Shop. The following link includes this information along with older pictures of the establishment: Fort Mill 217 Main St — TBHH The Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines have schematic parameters for the implementation of projecting signage. These guidelines are attached. Generally, the historic district signage guidelines indicate that there should be clear objectives established for the signage with limited impacts on defining features of a given building. If the subject building has discernable locations of original signage, such areas should be targeted for new or updated signs. The proposed signage should be compatible with the building and site. The impact on the overall area, including adjacent structures, should also be considered. The new awning that is proposed is black with the establishment branding on both ends. The Fort Mill Historic District Guidelines indicate that awnings are appropriate in the design of storefronts. Such awnings should be configured to be in proportion with the building and should not cover or obscure significant features of the building. While solid colors are encouraged, historic images indicate that the awning on this respective building 6 once consisted of a striped pattern. A simple shed shaped awning is appropriate in the instance of rectangular openings. Signage on a canopy is appropriate in areas with high pedestrian use. The exterior color palette that is preferred in The Fort Mill Historic District is of a traditional or historic feel. If the historic color scheme is not known, then an interpretation of those on similar building is appropriate, matte rather than high gloss paint finishes is preferred. Masonry repair should be undertaken to preserve historic materials. Deteriorated masonry mortar joints such be repointed with mortar that matches the strength, composition, color, and texture of the existing (if appropriate) or the original. The mortar joints should be duplicated in width and profile. Regarding the proposed improvements, vis-a-vis the above historic district guidelines, the following summation points should be made: • The proposed projecting sign drawing (attached) indicates a clear objective in design and branding. The impacts upon the building’s character defining features will remain limited. The location is appropriate to the facade, and it appears that the sign will be located at least eight feet above the sidewalk in accordance with building regulations. Additionally, the sign as designed falls within the maximum square footage allowed for a projecting sign (12 square feet) and it extends no more than three feet from the face of the façade in accordance with the zoning regulations. • The awning as designed meets the guidelines of the historic district. As noted above, these guidelines do encourage awnings that are solid in color. Additionally, signage or branding on an awning is appropriate in portions of the historic district which are pedestrian oriented, such as Main Street. • The proposed new paint colors include Naval and Fleur de Sel These paint colors seem to be appropriate in that they are simple in character. Additionally, it is appropriate that there will be one base color (Naval) and one accent color (Fleur de Sel). • It is anticipated that the applicant will handle the minor masonry repair on the rear of the building using a “best practices” protocol. As noted above, the historic district guidelines recommend that masonry repair should be undertaken to preserve historic materials. Deteriorated masonry mortar joints should be repointed with mortar that matches the strength, composition, color, and texture of the existing (if appropriate) or the original. The mortar joints should be duplicated in width and profile. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends that the HRB grant APPROVAL for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed exterior improvements as requested by the applicant. 7 ATTACHMENTS • Projecting signage guidelines • HRB application • Façade and rear elevation pictures w/description of work to be done • Submitted drawings 8 Projecting Sign This is an attached sign which projects and has one end attached to a building, and which does not employ ground support. 5.14 Design a projecting sign to be similar in character to those seen traditionally. • Design the sign bracket as a decorative or complementary element of the sign. The bracket should appear as part of the sign composition and design. 5.15 Projecting or blade signs may be considered. • Locate small projecting signs near the business entrance, just above the door or to the side of it. • Mount moderately sized projecting signs higher on the building, Design the sign bracket as a centered on the façade or positioned at the corner. decorative or complementary • Small hanging signs are appropriate under a canopy on commercial element of the sign. building types or from the inside of a porch on residential building types. Fort Mill Historic District Design Guidelines 9 10 Page 2 of 2 Date Received:� Historic Review Board Date: � Explanation of Work: Please use the area below to provide a detailed explanation of the proposed work. When explaining the work, please provide information on the design, materials, colors, as well as installation/construction procedures. For example, when applying for a wall sign please provide detail on the design of the sign, what materials will be used, what colors will be used, and how will the sign will be affixed to the wall. Please attach continuation sheets as needed. @) ?a;V\lr o\\ s,·J.c� Na-1c\" (:s'n.P-1w,'r, \.µ,\\1'e1W>� - \-\-C,5WloJYi) w �-th ct -t({r w �"Jc) 1v ) (5\.-o.rw,"" \..J�\h"... � - SW !"1�4 flev,r Je $e " ofcNVI), t\ (4) Add proposed projecting sign to application per applicant’s request. See attached email. AJM Acknowledgement of Requirements: The applicant acknowledges that the information provided is complete and that any exterior modification, except for ordinary maintenance or repair (not involving change in design, material, color, or outer appearance), shall not commence until the Historic Review Board approves the specific modification through a Certificate of Appropriateness. Additional permitting may be required prior to beginning work, including zoning review, stormwater/engineering review, building permitting, and business licensing. Please note, AU incomplete submissions will not be accepted. Signature Date P.O. BOX 159 • 200 TOM HALL STREET • FORT MILL, SC 29715 TELEPHONE (803) 547-2034 • FAX (803) 547-2126 11 From: Mark Kurowski To: Alex Moore Cc: Penelope Karagounis Subject: Re: 217 Main Street Date: Thursday, September 22, 2022 2:18:24 PM Attachments: image001.png ***This is an EXTERNAL email. Please do not click on a link or open any attachments unless you are confident it is from a trusted source. *** Good afternoon Alex. I just received some information from the tenant on a projected sign they'd like to add to the front of the building. Can we add this to the current COA application so it can be discussed with the other items requested? If not, I'll have the tenant submit a separate application. Details of the sign are below and the proof is attached. Sign size: 2’8” wide x 4’6” tall (not including mounting bracket) - Hanging mount type bracket to mount sign to building - All aluminum construction - 1/2" thick raised acrylic panel with vinyl graphics for logo - Double sided Thanks, Mark Kurowski 704-458-2364 On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 02:22:24 PM EDT, Alex Moore <amoore@fortmillsc.gov> wrote: Hi Mark, I did receive your application. I will place this on the agenda for Tuesday October 11th. This meeting will take place at 112 Confederate Street and will begin at 4:30 PM. Please plan to be in attendance at this meeting. 12 13 Projected Sign Awning graphic Left & Right 14 15  Sections of facade, Trim areas will be including both brick painted "Fleur De and siding, that are Sel" (Sherwin currently yellow will Williams SW766) be painted "Naval" (Sherwin Williams HGSW6244). Current awning will be replaced with a new, black awning 16 Sections of rear elevation that are currently yellow will be pained "Naval" (Sherwin Williams HGSW6244) Trim areas will be painted "Fleur De Sel" (Sherwin Williams SW766) 17 Projected Sign Awning graphic Left & Right 18 19 20 21 22 23 24