Planning Commission
Regular MeetingFort Mill, SC · November 20, 2018
Minutes
MINUTES
TOWN OF FORT MILL
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
November 20, 2018
112 Confederate Street
6:30 PM
Present: James Traynor, Tom Petty, Chris Wolfe, Zhengzheng Wiley, Matthew Lucarelli,
Planning Director Chris Pettit, Assistant Planner Nick Cauthen
Absent: Hynek Lettang, Ben Hudgins
Guests: See Attached Sign-In Sheet
Chairman Traynor called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
Mr. Wolfe made a motion to approve the minutes from the October 16, 2018 meeting as submitted.
Mr. Petty seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0.
NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
1. Annexation Request – 1822 North Dobys Bridge Road (Blanton Property): Planning
Director Pettit provided a brief overview of the request, the purpose of which was to review
and provide a recommendation regarding the annexation of a portion of 1822 North Dobys
Bridge Road. Planning Director Pettit went through the staff report and draft ordinance,
which included a sunset provision so that the annexation would be null and void in the
event that the property was not transferred to the proposed developer. Staff
Recommended in favor of approval.
Commissioner Wolfe questioned what the zoning classifications for the surrounding
properties were, additionally referencing those comments and concerns discussed for a
previous annexation request along Kimbrell Road related to residential contexts and traffic
impacts. Planning Director Pettit provided information on the surrounding zonings,
additionally noting that a traffic study for the project had commenced that will ultimately
determine what off-site road improvements, if any, would be required as a part of the
development.
Commissioner Lucarelli asked about the Comprehensive Plan designation, specifically Node
8, as far as the geographical limits of the various recommendations of the plan. Planning
Director Pettit noted that the interpretation of the Comprehensive Plan is based upon the
future land use map, the text, and the existing conditions of the area.
Chairman Traynor questioned whether there was an advantage in designating the property
as HC Highway Commercial versus another zoning designation that would also allow for the
use. Planning Director Pettit noted that the HC zoning classification did have additional
1
requirements, particularly relating to buffers, that other zoning classifications did not have.
Discussions occurred related to the property’s current zoning and the applicant’s ability to
develop the proposed use by right in the existing zoning.
Commissioner Petty questioned whether the TIA would address Haire road’s ability to
handle a commercial use given its current design standard, to which Planning Director Pettit
noted that the TIA would contemplate the road design and provide the reviewing entities
with the ability to determine if the road design would need to be enhanced to
accommodate the proposed use.
Chairman Traynor questioned whether the property owner was in attendance to answer
questions, to which it was determined that the property owner was not present. Having
requested comment from the property owner, Chairman Traynor provided others in
attendance with the same opportunity to speak to the request.
Those in attendance, particularly property owners in the area, discussed concerns related
to the notification policy for the annexation request, inserting a commercial use and zoning
in a residential context, the traffic impact of the proposed use, the existing traffic
congestion within the area, and the parking requirements for the proposed daycare.
Bill and Amy Strickland, proposed developers of the property, spoke to the concerns of the
neighbors using other Goddard Schools as examples of how the use has fit into residential
areas and how concerns have been addressed.
Commissioner Wolfe noted that his preference would be to have the project accessed from
Fort Mill Parkway versus Haire Road.
Commissioner Lucarelli noted that the site is zoned to allow a daycare by right in York
County, with the annexation request only changing the jurisdiction and providing the site
with the ability to connect to municipal utilities.
Questions arose related to the future use of the portion of the property fronting North
Dobys Bridge Road, to which the proposed developers of the property noted that the
current property owner required that piece be sold in conjunction with the larger portion
of the site and that the only planned use for the property would be for signage.
Commissioner Wiley questioned how the TIA would play a role in the annexation request,
to which Planning Director Pettit noted that the TIA would be required prior to the issuance
of a building permit and not necessarily as a part of the annexation process.
There being no further questions, Chairman Traynor requested a motion on the request.
Commissioner Wolfe made the motion to recommend in favor of denial due to access and
traffic issues. The motion was seconded by Chairman Traynor for discussion.
2
Commissioner Lucarelli acknowledged the concerns of the residents, but additionally spoke
to the request being consistent with other properties in the vicinity, the proposed
developer having a good intent with the project, the proposed developer showing good
effort to make the project fit, and the current York County zoning’s allowable uses.
Commissioner Petty noted that the request generally follows the Comprehensive Plan’s
recommendations and that his primary concern was related to the future uses of the small
portion of the property that is on the southwest side of Haire Road. Commissioner Petty
additionally spoke to the concerns of traffic, noting that the assumption would have to be
that the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) would do its job.
Commissioner Wiley addressed the County’s zoning and the by-right uses already allowed,
which had some that were more intensive than the proposed Goddard School.
Commissioner Wiley noted that her preference would be to have the results of the TIA prior
to having the project move forward.
Commissioner Wolfe spoke to the proposed location and the lack of access from a primary
road.
Chairman Traynor acknowledged the quality of the proposed use, but additionally spoke to
the concern of the impact on the residential of the area.
Following the discussion, Chairman Traynor called for a vote. The motion failed by a vote
of 2-3, with Commissioners Lucarelli, Petty, and Wiley opposed.
A subsequent motion was made by Commissioner Lucarelli to recommend in favor of
approval, which was seconded by Commissioner Wiley. The motion was approved by a
vote of 3-2, with Chairman Traynor and Commissioner Wolfe opposed.
2. Appearance Review – 1822 N. Dobys Bridge Road (Blanton Property): Assistant Planner
Cauthen provided a brief overview of the request, the purpose of which was to review and
grant commercial appearance review approval for a proposed preschool (Goddard School)
located near the intersection of Haire Road and North Dobys Bridge Road. Assistant Planner
Cauthen stated that the proposal included a 10,000 sq. ft. building with 57 parking spaces.
The Planning Department recommended approval of the request with the condition for
staff to be able to approve minor adjustments, and for a sidewalk to be installed at the
property frontage along Haire Road.
Mr. Wolfe asked if metal or fiber cement siding would be used? The applicant stated that
it depends on costs and the goal is for a home type feeling for the children. Mr. Traynor
stated that a metal roof is acceptable, but cement siding is greatly preferred over metal.
The applicant stated that the Rock Hill Goddard School branch has cement siding and
cement siding at this site would not be an issue.
Mr. Lucarelli commented that it is very important for the building elevations to fit in with
3
the residential nature of the area. The applicant stated that the building is the same theme
as a Kingsley/mill type building. Mr. Lucarelli asked about the side elevations and the
applicant said the building elevations would be consistent on all four sides minus the sign
and drive thru area.
Mr. Traynor noted that the dumpster screening material was brick veneer.
Mr. Wolfe asked about the use of the roll up door on the north elevation. The applicant
stated that this would be used as a multi-purpose room for good weather days.
Mr. Petty made a motion to grant commercial appearance review with conditions that
annexation is approved by Town Council, fiber cement siding is used instead of metal, staff
has the ability to approve minor modifications to the site plan and elevations if needed,
and a sidewalk must be provided along the Haire Road frontage of the property. Mr. Wolfe
seconded the motion. The motioned was approved by a vote of 5-0.
3. Commercial Appearance Review – 1560 N. Dobys Bridge Road: Assistant Planner Cauthen
provided a brief overview of the request, the purpose of which was to review and grant
commercial appearance review approval for a proposed daycare located at 1560 N. Dobys
Bridge Road. Assistant Planner Cauthen stated that the proposal included 2 buildings with
81 total parking spaces. The Planning Department recommended approval of the request
with the condition for staff to be able to approve minor adjustments and for the applicant
to provide sidewalks along both street frontages.
Mr. Wolfe asked the applicant to describe the offices being proposed in what is denoted as
building 2 on the site plan. The applicant responded that the building would be used for
after school care with supporting offices.
The applicant brought and explained the material samples for the building which included
brick, concrete, and stucco.
The applicant stated that the original plan for this property was to have an entrance from
Williams Road, but the latest proposal would just have an entrance from Dobys Bridge
Road. The Commission agreed that was a positive.
Mr. Traynor asked about the fence proposal. Staff stated that it met zoning requirements
but would need to get a building permit if over 6 feet and must not impede on any line of
sight guidelines. The applicant stated the fence would be decorative vinyl with wood grain
panels which makes it much more durable than solely wood.
Mr. Wolfe asked if the building and parking met setback requirements. Staff confirmed that
it does. Mr. Wolfe also added that he did not want for the dumpster opening to face the
parking lot. Staff stated that it would be masonry on 3 sides.
Mr. Traynor asked if 3-inch caliper trees are required? Staff noted that the minimum in the
4
current UDO was 2 inches.
The applicant stated that they would be extending sewer from Fairway Drive to the
property for this project.
Mr. Lucarelli made a motion to grant commercial appearance review with conditions to
allow for staff to be able to approve minor modifications to the site plan and elevations if
needed, the dumpster enclosure masonry must match the principal structure materials,
and sidewalks must be provided along both street frontages. Mr. Petty seconded the
motion. The motioned was approved by a vote of 5-0.
INFORMATION / DISCUSSION
1. Preliminary Appearance Review – 114 Springs Street:
Planning Director Pettit gave a brief description of the preliminary appearance review. The
project included a 1 story office/retail building located at the corner of Springs Street and
Elliott Street.
Mr. Traynor asked about the zoning classification of the property? Staff responded that the
property is zoned Local Commercial. Mr. Wolfe asked if the project had enough parking
spaces to meet the zoning requirement? Staff responded that a complete review of this
project has not yet been completed.
The applicant stated the current plan proposes to bring the building close to the street and
to keep the current retaining wall that is in front of the building. Nineteen parking spaces
have been provided and depending on compact spaces that number could increase slightly
according to the applicant.
The Commission asked if the building would contain a restaurant and the applicant
responded that it would not due to parking restraints. Staff added that on-street parking
does not count towards parking requirements.
Mr. Wolfe asked how many tenants would occupy the building? The applicant stated that
it depends on tenant interest and could be a single tenant or up to 4 tenants.
Mr. Petty asked the applicant if they were just developing or planning to occupy the site?
The applicant responded that they would not be occupying the site.
The applicant stated that the roof of the building would be around 16-18 feet and the
parapet would extend to approximately 22-24 feet.
The Commission was concerned about the blank wall on the south side elevation. Mr.
Traynor asked if any windows were being proposed? The applicant responded that the
proximity to the property line eliminated a few options, but fire rated glass could be a
5
possibility. The Commission responded that faux windows would also suffice.
Mr. Wolfe asked if the sidewalks would remain on both streets and who the intended
audience was for the building? The applicant stated that the sidewalks would remain, and
the building was intended for professional office / flex space.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25.
Respectfully submitted,
Chris Pettit, AICP
Planning Director
December 12, 2018
6
7
Agenda
TOWN OF FORT MILL
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
November 20, 2018
112 Confederate Street
6:30 PM
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Regular Meeting: October 16, 2018 [Pages 2-4]
NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
1. Annexation Request: 1822 North Dobys Bridge Road (Blanton Property) [Pages 5-17]
An ordinance annexing a portion of the property currently or formerly known as York
County Tax Map Number 738-00-00-045 (formerly York County Tax Map Number 020-12-
01-279), containing approximately 4.1 +/- acres located at 1822 North Dobys Bridge Road
2. Appearance Review: 1822 North Dobys Bridge Road (Blanton Property) [Pages 18-25]
Request from The Goddard School to grant commercial appearance review approval for
a proposed preschool located near the intersection of Haire Road and North Dobys Bridge
Road
3. Appearance Review: 1560 North Dobys Bridge Road [Pages 26-38]
Request from Ferrara-Buist LLC to grant commercial appearance review approval for a
proposed daycare located at 1560 North Dobys Bridge Road
INFORMATION / DISCUSSION
1. Preliminary Appearance Review: 114 Springs Street
ADJOURN
The following press was notified of the meeting by email or fax in accordance of the Freedom of Information Act: The
Herald; CN2; WRHI; Fort Mill Times and WBTV. The agenda was also posted at the entrance to Town Hall the required
length of time and on the Town website.
The Town of Fort Mill is committed to assuring accessibility with reasonable accommodation, of Town services and
facilities for all individuals, in compliance with federal law. Please contact the Town Manager’s Office at 803-547-
2116 if you need assistance.
1
MINUTES
TOWN OF FORT MILL
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
October 16, 2018
112 Confederate Street
6:30 PM
Present: James Traynor, Hynek Lettang, Tom Petty, Ben Hudgins, Chris Wolfe, Zhengzheng
Wiley, Planning Director Chris Pettit, Assistant Planner Nick Cauthen
Absent: Matthew Lucarelli
Guests: See Attached Sign-In Sheet
Chairman Traynor called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
Mr. Wolfe made a motion to approve the minutes from the August 21, 2018 meeting as submitted.
Mr. Hudgins seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0.
Mr. Hudgins made a motion to approve the minutes from the September 18, 2018 meeting as
submitted. Mr. Wolfe seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0.
NEW BUSINESS ITEMS
Ms. Wiley arrived prior to New Business Item #1
1. Commercial Appearance Review – CEENTA: Assistant Planner Cauthen provided a brief
overview of the request, the purpose of which was to review and grant commercial
appearance review approval for a proposed medical office building located on the south
side of Sutton Road near the intersection of Smythe Road. Assistant Planner Cauthen stated
that the proposal included a 30,000 sq. ft., 2 story building with 150 parking spaces. The
Planning Department recommended approval of the request with the condition for staff to
be able to approve minor adjustments.
Mr. Traynor asked if material samples were available for the Commission. The applicant
brought samples and explained them in detail, which included masonry block and precast
concrete panels. Mr. Wolfe stated that a mix of materials as shown on the elevations was
greatly preferred over plain white walls. The applicant asked about flexibility regarding the
colors and materials and Mr. Traynor responded that any significant changes would have
to come back before the Planning Commission for commercial appearance review.
Mr. Traynor asked if the horizontal material shown above the windows was timber, to
which the applicant responded that it was precast concrete. Ms. Wiley stated that she
thought the colors seemed extremely bright and overwhelming. The applicant stated that
the colors were much softer and not exactly as they appeared in the elevations. The sample
2
materials were said to be a much better example of the exact colors.
The applicant stated that the intention was for Charlotte Ear Eye Nose and Throat
Associates to occupy the second floor and for the first floor to be available for a separate
medical group.
Mr. Wolfe asked if the panels were inset, to which the applicant responded that the exterior
was not entirely flush. The tan panels and the base would be set about 3 inches back. It was
also stated that a canopy would stretch the entire width of the front of the building and
along a portion of the sides to protect patrons from the weather when entering and exiting
the building.
Mr. Traynor asked about the difference between the vision glass and the spandrel glass, to
which the applicant responded that it was the same glass but there was a solid behind the
spandrel glass.
Mr. Lettang asked how the white was going to stay clean, to which the applicant stated that
pressure-washing and landscaping would help and that they had not had issues with other
buildings that had the same white material. The Commission and applicant agreed that
appearance and cleanliness would be of the upmost importance considering the use of the
building.
Mr. Petty stated that the building had nice detail and unique character. Mr. Hudgins
followed by saying the presentation of the material samples were very helpful.
Mr. Hudgins made a motion to grant commercial appearance review as submitted. Mr.
Wolfe seconded the motion. Mr. Wolfe requested that the motion be amended to include
the condition allowing staff to be able to approve minor modifications to the site plan and
elevations if needed. There being no objections, the motion on the table was amended as
requested. The motioned was approved by a vote of 6-0.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:59.
Respectfully submitted,
Chris Pettit, AICP
Planning Director
November 12, 2018
3
4
Meeting Information
Meeting Type Planning Commission
Meeting Date November 20, 2018
Request Summary
Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion
Request Type
Public Hearing Executive Session Other
Case Summary
X Annexation Rezoning Text Amendment
Case Type
Subdivision Plat Appearance Review Other
Property Information
Applicant Bonnie H. Blanton
Property Owner Same as above
Property Location 1822 Dobys Bridge Rd. N.
Tax Map Numbers Currently or formerly known as 738-00-00-045 (portion)
Formerly known as 020-12-01-279 (portion)
Acreage 4.1 +/- acres
Current Zoning RD-II (York County) – Previously MXU Mixed Use
Requested Zoning HC, Highway Commercial
Existing Use Vacant
Title
An ordinance annexing a portion of the property currently or formerly known as York County Tax
Map Number 738-00-00-045 (formerly York County Tax Map Number 020-12-01-279), containing
approximately 4.1 +/- acres located at 1822 North Dobys Bridge Road
Background Information
Site The subject property is undeveloped.
Characteristics
5
Neighboring Direction Zoning Existing Use
Uses North RD-II Single Family Residential
South RD-II Single Family Residential
HC Highway Commercial
East RD-II Single Family Residential
West RUD Single Family Residential
Zoning Summary The property is currently zoned RD-II per York County GIS.
The county’s RD-II district allows single-family residences (10,000 sf per
dwelling), townhomes (2,000 sf per unit), apartments and condominiums. The
district also allows child/adult care centers, religious uses, manufactured home
subdivisions, parks, nursing facilities and schools. The RD-II District also
requires a minimum open space of 20%. The property is currently vacant.
The property was previously annexed into the Town as MXU Mixed Use by
Ordinance No. 2016-21. The annexation and MXU approval were conditioned
upon the property being transferred to a development group, which ultimately
did not occur and thus made the annexation and MXU approval null and void.
The prior MXU approval allowed for a continuing care retirement facility with
up to 200 age-restricted dwelling units and up to 36,000 square feet of office,
retail, and municipal uses.
Applicant The applicant intends to develop the property as a Goddard School location
Proposal (preschool / daycare use). An application has been made to the Town’s
Planning Commission for the purpose of Commercial Appearance Review
approval for the proposed +/- 10,000 square foot use.
Comprehensive The property is located within an area that has been designated as
Plan “Commercial” and “High-Density Residential” on the Town of Fort Mill’s Future
Land Use Map, last updated in May 2016. High Density is generally defined
as six or more dwelling units per acre, and may include a mix of single- and
multi-family development.
The property is also located in Node 8. The Comprehensive Plan
recommends the following types of development within Node 8:
“Development in Node 8 will primarily be higher density residential
near the center of the node and along the Fort Mill Southern Bypass,
with neighborhood commercial near the intersection of Doby’s
Bridge Road and the Bypass, and medium density residential near
the periphery including townhomes and apartments, transitions to
single family detached homes to the east and south near the river.”
6
Traffic Impact Any development of the property would require a review of the proposed
traffic impact as well as a review of the proposed access locations. The review
of any proposed development would be coordinated with SCDOT and York
County and may require the completion of a full traffic impact analysis (TIA) to
determine if off-site transportation improvements would be required to
mitigate the development’s impact to the transportation network.
Any off-site transportation improvements deemed necessary by the Town,
York County, and/or SCDOT would be the responsibility of the developer.
Fire Impact The property is located approximately 2 miles (4 minutes) ordinary driving
distance from the town’s main fire station on Tom Hall Street and 1 mile from
the town’s fire station site on Fort Mill Parkway.
Utility Impact The property is located in the town’s service area and would be served by the
town’s water and sewer system. As with all other projects, any upgrades
necessary to serve the project would be borne by the applicant. The applicant
would also be responsible for securing any necessary easements to connect to
the town’s existing utility system.
School Impact The requested zoning designation of HC Highway Commercial would not allow
for residential uses. Therefore, there would be no impact on future school
enrollment.
Discussion The property is contiguous to the town limits and is, therefore, eligible for
annexation.
As mentioned previously, the property was previously annexed into the Town
as MXU Mixed Use, which entitled the property to up to 200 age-restricted
dwelling units and up to 36,000 square feet of commercial. The applicant was
working towards approval of the proposed Goddard School under the MXU
Mixed Use zoning, however it was discovered by Town staff that the prior
7
ordinances adopted by Town Council for the annexation and MXU plan were
null and void based on a sunset provision within the approved ordinances.
Therefore, the applicant is now requesting annexation of only that portion of
the property that will be utilized for the Goddard School and has requested an
HC Highway Commercial zoning designation.
The HC Highway Commercial designation is consistent with nearby properties
along both North Dobys Bridge Road and Fort Mill Parkway and is generally
consistent with the development patterns of the area and the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan.
Based upon the information above, staff recommends in favor of approval of
the request for annexation with a designation of HC Highway Commercial.
Nothing in this report shall be deemed a guarantee that water and/or sewer
service/capacity will be available at the time of development. As noted, any
future development may also be subject to a TIA prior to the approval of an
encroachment permit. Any improvements deemed necessary as a result of the
TIA would be the responsibility of the owner/developer.
Alternatives
1. Recommend approval of the annexation ordinance with a zoning designation of HC.
2. Recommend approval of the annexation ordinance with an alternate zoning designation.
3. Recommend denial of the annexation request.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL of the request for annexation
Recommendation
with an HC zoning designation.
Name & Title Chris Pettit, Planning Director
Department Planning Department
Date of Request November 20, 2018
Legislative History
Planning Commission 11/20/2018: Scheduled
First Reading 11/13/2018: Scheduled
Public Hearing 11/26/2018: Scheduled
Second Reading 11/26/2018: Scheduled
8
Attachments
• Annexation Application
• Aerial Map
• Zoning Map
• Proposed Site Plan (Scheduled for Planning Commission’s consideration on 11/20/18)
• Draft Ordinance
9
Annexation Application
10
Aerial Map
11
Zoning Map
12
Proposed Site Plan
13
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL
ORDINANCE NO. 2018-___
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY OR FORMERLY KNOWN AS
YORK COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBER 738-00-00-045 (FORMERLY YORK COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBER 020-
12-01-279), CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 4.1 +/- ACRES LOCATED AT 1822 NORTH DOBYS BRIDGE
ROAD
WHEREAS, a proper petition was submitted to the Fort Mill Town Council on November 6,
2018, by Bonnie H. Blanton, (the “Property Owner”), requesting that a portion of the property
currently or formerly known as York County Tax Map Number 738-00-00-045 (formerly York County
Tax Map Number 020-12-01-279 as it was known following the annexation approval from Ordinance
No. 2016-21) be annexed to and included within the corporate limits of the Town of Fort Mill under
the provisions of S.C. Code Section 5-3-150(3); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Town of Fort Mill, in a duly called meeting on
November 20, 2018, reviewed the request and forwarded their recommendation to Town Council;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was advertised and held on November 26, 2018, during a duly
called regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Fort Mill; and
WHEREAS, Section 5-3-150(3) of the Code of Laws of the State of South Carolina, as amended,
provides that any area or property which is contiguous to a municipality may be annexed to the
municipality by filing with the municipal governing body a petition signed by all persons owning real
estate in the area requesting annexation. Upon the agreement of the governing body to accept the
petition and annex the area, and the enactment of an ordinance declaring the area annexed to the
municipality, the annexation is complete; and
WHEREAS, using the definition of “contiguous” as outlined in S.C. Code Section 5-3-305, the
Town Council has determined that the above referenced property is contiguous to property that was
previously annexed into the corporate limits of the Town of Fort Mill; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that annexation would be in the best interest of
both the property owners and the Town of Fort Mill;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Town Council of the Town of Fort Mill in Council
assembled:
SECTION I. Annexation. It is hereby declared by the Town Council of the Town of Fort Mill, in
Council assembled, that the incorporated limits of the Town of Fort Mill shall be extended so as to
include, annex and make a part of said Town, the described area of territory above referred to, being
more or less 4.1 acres, the same being fully described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, and contiguous
to land already within the Town of Fort Mill. Pursuant to S.C. Code Section 5-3-110, this annexation
shall include the whole or any part of any street, roadway, or highway abutting the above referenced
14
property, not exceeding the width thereof, provided such street, roadway or highway has been
accepted for and is under permanent public maintenance by the Town of Fort Mill, York County, or
the South Carolina Department of Transportation.
SECTION II. Zoning Classification of Annexed Property. The above-described property, upon
annexation into the corporate limits of the Town of Fort Mill, shall be zoned, as follows: HC Highway
Commercial.
SECTION III. Voting District. For the purpose of municipal elections, the above-described
property, upon annexation into the incorporated limits of the Town of Fort Mill, shall be assigned to
and made a part of Ward Four (4).
SECTION IV. Notification. Notice of the annexation of the above-described area and the
inclusion thereof within the incorporated limits of the Town of Fort Mill shall forthwith be filed with
the Secretary of State of South Carolina (SCSOS), the South Carolina Department of Public Safety
(SCDPS), and the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT), pursuant to S.C. Code § 5-3-
90(E).
SECTION V. Severability. If any section, subsection, or clause of this ordinance shall be
deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections,
subsections, and clauses shall not be affected thereby.
SECTION VI. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective from and after the date that the
Property Owner transfers the above-described property to William A. & Amy L. Strickland, through a
deed recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds, York County, South Carolina. If the property is
not transferred within one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of adoption, this ordinance
shall be of no force or effect.
SIGNED AND SEALED this _____ day of ___________________, 2018, having been duly
adopted by the Town Council for the Town of Fort Mill on the _____ day of ___________________,
2018.
First Reading: November 12, 2018 TOWN OF FORT MILL
Public Hearing: November 26, 2018
Second Reading: November 26, 2018 ______________________________
Guynn H. Savage, Mayor
LEGAL REVIEW ATTEST
______________________________ ______________________________
Barron B. Mack, Jr, Town Attorney Virginia Burgess, Town Clerk
15
EXHIBIT A
Property Description
All those certain pieces, parcels or tracts of land lying, being and situate in Fort Mill Township, County
of York, State of South Carolina, containing 4.1 acres, more or less, containing a portion of the
property shown in the map attached as Exhibit B, and being more particularly described as a portion
of York County Tax Map Number 738-00-00-045 (formerly York County Tax Map Number 020-12-01-
279 as it was known following the annexation of Ordinance No. 2016-21).
Pursuant to S.C. Code Section 5-3-110, this annexation shall include the whole or any part of any
street, roadway, or highway abutting the above referenced property, not exceeding the width
thereof, provided such street, roadway or highway has been accepted for and is under permanent
public maintenance by the Town of Fort Mill, York County, or the South Carolina Department of
Transportation.
16
EXHIBIT B
Property Map
York County Tax Map Number 738-00-00-045 - PORTION
(Formerly York County Tax Map Number 020-12-01-279)
17
Meeting Information
Meeting Type Planning Commission
Meeting Date November 20, 2018
Request Summary
Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion
Request Type
Public Hearing Executive Session Other
Case Summary
Annexation Rezoning Text Amendment
Case Type
Subdivision Plat X Appearance Review Other
Property Information
Applicant The Goddard School
Property Owner Bonnie H. Blanton
Property Location 1822 N. Dobys Bridge Road
Tax Map Numbers P/O 020-12-01-279
Acreage 4.1 +/- acres
Current Zoning HC, Highway Commercial (PENDING)
Existing Use Vacant
Title
Request from The Goddard School to grant commercial appearance review approval for a proposed
building located on Haire Road.
Background Information
Site Characteristics The property is located on the northern side of Haire Road near the
intersection of N. Dobys Bridge Road. It consists of 4.1 +/- acres and is
currently vacant. The property has approximately 500 linear feet of road
frontage on Haire Road. The applicant is proposing a building for early
childhood education.
18
Neighboring Uses Direction Zoning Existing Use
North RD-II Residential (County)
South HC/RD-II Residential (County)
East MXU/RD-II Vacant/Residential (County)
West RUD Residential (County)
Zoning Summary Pending approval of the annexation request, the site will be zoned HC, Highway
Commercial.
• Minimum lot area: 10,000 square feet
• Minimum lot width: 75’ at building line
• Minimum front yard setback: 35’
• Minimum side yard setback: 10’
• Minimum rear yard setback: 35’
Applicant Proposal The applicant is proposing a 10,000 square ft. building with 57 parking
spaces.
The applicant has provided a site plan showing the proposed layout of the
project. The building will be one story and there will be two access points
on Haire Road. There will also be a toddler play area, preschool play area,
and playground.
The proposed building elevations have been provided (attached). They
include masonry veneer, metal or fiber cement siding, and metal roofing.
Staff The site plan is pending review and approval by the town’s Fire Marshal
Recommendation and Building Official. Should the Planning Commission wish to grant
commercial appearance review approval, staff would request including
language in the approval motion to allow for minor modifications to be
made to the site plan to accommodate comments or concerns made by
the Fire Marshal and/or Building Official.
The site plan and landscape plan generally comply with all zoning
requirements. The proposed building elevations meet the requirements
of the zoning ordinance and feature high quality building materials, with
variations in vertical and horizontal depth.
Staff recommends in favor of approval, with a condition allowing staff to
approve minor adjustments to the site plan, landscape plan, signage plan,
and lighting plan to satisfy the comments and requirements of the town’s
Fire Marshal, SCDOT, and/or the town’s Utilities and Planning
Departments.
19
Alternatives
1. Grant commercial appearance review approval with conditions.
2. Grant commercial appearance review approval.
3. Deny commercial appearance review approval.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL for the request, conditioned
upon allowing staff to administratively approve minor adjustments to the
Recommendation site plan, landscape plan, signage plan, and lighting plan to satisfy the
comments and requirements of the town’s Fire Marshal, SCDOT, and/or
the town’s Utilities and Planning Departments.
Name & Title Nick Cauthen, Assistant Planner
Department Planning Department
Date of Request November 20, 2018
Legislative History
Town Council Annexation Request Pending
Planning Commission 11/20/18: Annexation Request and Appearance Review Scheduled
Attachments
• Aerial Map
• Zoning Map
• Photos from N. Dobys Bridge Road and Haire Road
• Proposed Plans and Building Elevations
20
Aerial Map
Zoning Map
COUNTY
MXU
HC
21
Photo of subject property from N. Dobys Bridge Road
Photo of Subject Property from Haire Road
22
DIMENSION NOTE
THE
GROUP
PAVEMENT STRIPING SPECIFICATION:
”
COPYRIGHT & OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
”
SIGNATURE
SEAL
DEVELOPMENT DATA:
DATE 10.30.18
PROJECT NO. 18194
CAD REFERENCE NO. AUTOCAD 2018
PLOT REFERENCE NO. NONE
DRAWING SCALE
REVISIONS
NAME DATE DESCRIPTION
RECOMMENDED PAVING SPECIFICATIONS:
R
PROJECT TITLE
FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT
THE GODDARD SCHOOL
HAIRE ROAD
GENERAL NOTES:
FORT MILL FORT MILL, SC 29715
SITE LEGEND
SHEET TITLE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
SHEET NUMBER
23
GENERAL NOTES
1. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF STUD TO FACE OF STUD UNLESS 7. FRAMING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SOLID WOOD BLOCKING AT 10. A MIN. CLEAR AREA OF 18" IS REQUIRED TO THE SIDE OF EACH
NOTED OTHERWISE. (U.N.O.) ALL WALL MOUNTED FIXTURES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO - DOOR STRIKE JAMB ON THE PULL SIDE.
WALL MOUNTED SHELVING, BASE AND UPPER CABINETS, CUBBIES,
2. ALL INTERIOR WALLS ARE 3 1/2" WOOD STUDS U.N.O. CLOSET SHELVING AND RODS, WALL MOUNTED DOOR STOPS, TOILET 11. ALL COUNTERTOP EDGES AND CORNERS SHALL BE ROUNDED. BEACHAM BUNCE + MANLEY ARCHITECTURE PLLC
ROOM PARTITIONS, LAV'S, GRAB BARS, MIRRORS, SOAP DISPENSERS,
1435 WEST MOREHEAD STREET
3. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS ARE 5 1/2" WOOD STUDS W/ SHEATHING U.N.O. WASTE RECEPTACLES, TOILET PAPER DISPENSERS, MOP SINK, AND 12. ROLLER SHADES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL OUTSIDE WINDOWS
SUITE 160
ACCESSORIES. AND INTERIOR CLASSROOM WINDOWS. CHARLOTTE, NC 28208
4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND 13. SEE 09/A1.2 FOR WALL HUNG CHILD HAND WASH LAVATORY 704.334.1716
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. 8. SEE SECTION 10/A4.1 FOR TYP. CLOSET SHELVING AND SECTION MOUNTING HEIGHTS IN CLASSROOMS.
06/A4.1 FOR PANTRY SHELVING.
5. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS AND HANGING FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 14. SEE 08/A4.1 FOR PHONE, DUPLEX, AND LIGHT SWITCH MOUNTING
(FEC AND HFE) TO BE LOCATED PER LOCAL FIRE CODES. (PROVIDE 9. 48" H. CORNERS GUARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL OUTSIDE HEIGHTS IN CLASSROOMS. WWW.BBM-ARCH.COM
BLOCKING AND KEEP CLEAR OF ALL ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING LINES). CORNERS (FLUSH TO FLOOR - BASE TO ABUT) THROUGHOUT THE
BUILDING INCLUDING HALF WALLS AT DIAPER CHANGING SINKS. 15. PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING AT ALL CONNECTIONS TO THE WALL.
6. SEE 19/A1.2 FOR SCREEN PANEL SECTION LOCATED IN TOILET 107B. SEE: 15/A4.1 ADD 24" WIDE BY 16" DEEP SHELF ABOVE PHONE SERVICE FOR
NETWORKING HARDWARE IN MECHANICAL 103 AS SHOWN.
SEAL
PLANNING COMMISSION
PRELIMINARY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DATE 10.26.2018
PROJECT NO. 18SDS380
REVISIONS
NUMB DATE DESCRIPTION
PLAYROOM JUNIOR K JUNIOR K
YOUNG TODDLERS TODDLERS GET SET
TOILET TOILET
R
TOILET PROJECT TITLE
TOILET TOILET TOILET
CORRIDOR 29715
FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT
THE GODDARD SCHOOL
KITCHENETTE
STORAGE WOMEN MEN
TOILET
FOYER
FIRST STEPS INFANTS
KITCHEN
STAFF AREA PRE-SCHOOL PRE-SCHOOL
PANTRY
SLEEPING
FORT MILL II
1124 HENSLEY RD
MECH
DIRECTOR ENTRY
OFFICE OWNER
OFFICE
FORT MILL, SC
SHEET TITLE
FLOOR PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
01 FLOOR PLAN
N
A1.1
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
24
BEACHAM BUNCE + MANLEY ARCHITECTURE PLLC
1435 WEST MOREHEAD STREET
SUITE 160
CHARLOTTE, NC 28208
704.334.1716
WWW.BBM-ARCH.COM
"SHELL WHITE" "STONE WHITE" "SLATE" "CHARCOAL"
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS, MATERIALS AND COLORS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY.
SEAL
PLANNING COMMISSION
PRELIMINARY REVIEW
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DATE 10.26.2018
PROJECT NO. 18SDS380
MASONRY VENEER REVISIONS
"SHELL WHITE" NUMB DATE DESCRIPTION
METAL ROOFING "SLATE"
VERTICAL SIDING, METAL
PAINTED STEEL
10 EAST & WEST ELEVATION OR FIBER CEMENT
"STONE WHITE"
COLUMNS
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
R
PROJECT TITLE
29715
FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT
THE GODDARD SCHOOL
METAL ROOFING
"SLATE"
ALUM. GUTTER AND
DOWNSPOUT
"CHARCOAL"
PAINTED METAL
DOORS
MASONRY VENEER
"SHELL WHITE"
VERTICAL SIDING, METAL SECTIONAL OVERHEAD
11 NORTH ELEVATION OR FIBER CEMENT
"STONE WHITE"
DOOR "CHARCOAL"
FORT MILL II
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1124 HENSLEY RD
METAL ROOFING
FORT MILL, SC
"SLATE"
ALUM. GUTTER AND SHEET TITLE
DOWNSPOUT
"CHARCOAL"
PAINTED STEEL
COLUMNS "CHARCOAL"
EXTERIOR
MASONRY VENEER ELEVATIONS
"SHELL WHITE" SHEET NUMBER
12 SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
VERTICAL SIDING, METAL
OR FIBER CEMENT
"STONE WHITE"
PAINTED STEEL
COLUMNS
A2.1
25
Meeting Information
Meeting Type Planning Commission
Meeting Date November 20, 2018
Request Summary
Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion
Request Type
Public Hearing Executive Session Other
Case Summary
Annexation Rezoning Text Amendment
Case Type
Subdivision Plat X Appearance Review Other
Property Information
Applicant David R. Buist
Property Owner Clover Community Bank
Property Location 1560 N. Dobys Bridge Road
Tax Map Numbers 020-17-01-062
Acreage 3.1 +/- acres
Current Zoning HC, Highway Commercial
Existing Use Vacant
Title
Request from Ferrara-Buist LLC. to grant commercial appearance review approval for 2 proposed
buildings located at 1560 N. Dobys Bridge Road.
Background Information
Site Characteristics The property is located on the eastern side of N. Dobys Bridge Road at the
intersection of Williams Road. It consists of 3.1 +/- acres and is currently
vacant. The property has approximately 500 linear feet of road frontage
on N. Dobys Bridge Road and 150 linear feet of road frontage on Williams
Road. The applicant is proposing 2 buildings for a daycare facility.
26
Neighboring Uses Direction Zoning Existing Use
North RC-I Residential (County)
South PND Vacant
East HC Pet Spa
West RC-I Residential (County)
Zoning Summary The site is currently zoned HC, Highway Commercial.
• Minimum lot area: 10,000 square feet
• Minimum lot width: 75’ at building line
• Minimum front yard setback: 35’
• Minimum side yard setback: 10’
• Minimum rear yard setback: 35’
Applicant Proposal The applicant is proposing two buildings and 81 total parking spaces.
Building 1 is 12,045 square feet and proposed for a daycare. Building 2 is
8,085 square feet and proposed for after school care/office use. An 8’
privacy vinyl fence is also proposed and must meet line of site guidelines.
The applicant has provided a site plan showing the proposed layout of the
project. Both buildings will be one story with parking located in between.
The entrance will be from N. Dobys Bridge Road and is aligned with Nims
Lake Road. This is subject to the review and approval of SCDOT.
The proposed building elevations have been provided (attached). They
include brick, precast concrete, and stucco gables.
Staff The site plan is pending review and approval by the town’s Fire Marshal
Recommendation and Building Official. Should the Planning Commission wish to grant
commercial appearance review approval, staff would request including
language in the approval motion to allow for minor modifications to be
made to the site plan to accommodate comments or concerns made by
the Fire Marshal and/or Building Official.
The site plan and landscape plan generally comply with all zoning
requirements. The proposed building elevations meet the requirements
of the zoning ordinance and feature high quality building materials, with
variations in vertical and horizontal depth.
Staff recommends in favor of approval, with a condition allowing staff to
approve minor adjustments to the site plan, landscape plan, signage plan,
and lighting plan to satisfy the comments and requirements of the town’s
Fire Marshal, SCDOT, and/or the town’s Utilities and Planning
Departments.
27
Alternatives
1. Grant commercial appearance review approval with conditions.
2. Grant commercial appearance review approval.
3. Deny commercial appearance review approval.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL for the request, conditioned
upon allowing staff to administratively approve minor adjustments to the
Recommendation site plan, landscape plan, signage plan, and lighting plan to satisfy the
comments and requirements of the town’s Fire Marshal, SCDOT, and/or
the town’s Utilities and Planning Departments.
Name & Title Nick Cauthen, Assistant Planner
Department Planning Department
Date of Request November 20, 2018
Legislative History
Planning Commission 11/20/18: Scheduled
Attachments
• Aerial Map
• Zoning Map
• Photos from N. Dobys Bridge Road and Williams Road
• Proposed Plans and Building Elevations
28
Aerial Map
Zoning Map
29
Photo of subject property from N. Dobys Bridge Road
Photo of Subject Property from Williams Road
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Get email alerts for Fort Mill
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.