Planning and Zoning

Planning and Development Clyde “C.B.” Strain, Director PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, September 13th, 2017, 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers *** Call to Order / Roll Call *** Approval of August 9th, 2017 Meeting Minutes PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM ONE: Review the proposed updates to The City of Gallup Land Development Standards. Bohannan Huston and Dekker Perich Sabatini (DPS) will present module 1, which includes the drafting of zoning districts and use regulations. INFORMATION ITEMS ITEM TWO: City Council Actions Taken ITEM THREE: August 2017 Building Permit Activity Report *** Open Floor *** Adjourn 110 West Aztec Avenue • Gallup, New Mexico 87301 • phone 505.863.1240 • email cstrain@gallupnm.gov  Planning & Zoning Commission August 9th, 2017 Minutes City Council Chambers The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman Kent Wilson. Upon roll call, the following were present: Vice-Madam Chair K. Mackenzie-Chavez Commissioner F. Pawlowski Commissioner F. Kozeliski Commissioner M. Long Commissioner L. Miller Upon roll call, the following were absent: Commissioner J. Dooley Chairman Wilson asked if any Commissioner had a conflict of interest for any agenda item, if so to recuse him/herself prior to discussing the particular item. Upon roll call, the votes were: Chairman K. Wilson (No) Vice-Madam Chair K. Mackenzie-Chavez (No) Commissioner F. Pawlowski (No) Commissioner F. Kozeliski (No) Commissioner M. Long (No) Commissioner L. Miller (No) Presented to the Chairman and Commissioners for their approval were the minutes of the May 10th, meeting. Commissioner Pawlowski motioned for approval of minutes as presented. Seconded by Vice-Madam Chair Mackenzie-Chavez, A.V.A. Motion Carried. Upon roll call, the votes were: Commissioner F. Pawlowski (Yes) Vice-Madam Chair K. Mackenzie-Chavez (Yes) Chairman K. Wilson (Yes) Commissioner F. Kozeliski (Yes) Commissioner M. Long (Yes) Commissioner L. Miller (Yes) Presented to the Chairman and Commissioners for their approval were the minutes of the July 10th, special meeting. Vice-Madam Chair Mackenzie-Chavez motioned for approval of minutes as presented. Seconded by Commissioner Kozeliski, A.V.A. Motion Carried. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9th, 2017 Page 1 of 5 Upon roll call, the votes were: Vice-Madam Chair K. Mackenzie-Chavez (Yes) Commissioner F. Kozeliski (Yes) Chairman K. Wilson (Yes) Commissioner F. Pawlowski (Yes) Commissioner M. Long (Yes) Commissioner L. Miller (Yes) Chairman Wilson administered the oath required by state law for public forum. Chairman Wilson stated anyone wishing to speak limit their comments to three minutes and don't duplicate a previous point. Will have one opportunity to testify. ITEM ONE: CASE # 17-01100002: Application was withdrawn by appellant and the Commission does not need to take any action. No discussion on Item One. ITEM TWO: CASE # 17-01000001: Present before the Planning and Zoning Commission for review and recommendation to City Council. Request by Leo Fisher, property owner, for The City of Gallup to vacate the 10 Foot Public Utility Easement (P.U.E.) north of Mr. Fisher's property in order to construct a carport to property line. The property is located at 1010 Patton Drive; more particularly described as Lot 1, Block 1, Southfork Subdivision Unit 1. CB used the overhead screen to display the area located on Patton Drive in the Southfork Subdivision. He explained that the applicant is requesting to vacate a 10 foot public utility easement (P.U.E.) in the northern boundary line. He displayed the subdivision plat showing the 10 foot public utility easement and how it runs along the north property boundary line. There's also a 20 foot wide public utility easement line that runs along the length of the backside of the subdivision, which will remain intact. Displayed another subdivision plat that’s immediately adjacent to the north of Mr. Fisher's lot, which he also owns. There's a 10 foot P.U.E. on the neighboring lot as well. They're two easements butting up next to each other. The request to vacate the easement is for a couple of things; The City is not using the easement at this time and has no plan to locate utilities within that easement. CB explained that it’s kind of typical to put easements along the borders of boundaries of subdivisions when they're first platted, just in case. In this case, all of the lots are served so there's no need to develop utilities within that easement. The Gallup Task Force did review the request and they did not have an issue with vacating that portion of the easement; its 10 feet wide and 219.99 feet long. The issue comes with the construction of the carport. CB displayed the GIS Map explaining that the applicant wants to construct a carport to the property line. The Code requires that an accessory structure meets a setback minimum of five feet (corrected himself saying it's actually 10 feet) from the property line. The vacation of an easement will not negate that requirement; they'll still have to meet the setback regardless if the property owner owns the adjacent property. The Code doesn't give exceptions for properties that are owned next to each other; it goes by the property boundary lines. Anything that is attached will have to comply with the principal structure setbacks, which is 10 feet. If it's detached it will have to be separated a minimum of 10 feet from the principal structure and then 5 feet from the side lot line. CB wanted to make clear that the vacation of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9th, 2017 Page 2 of 5 easement will not relieve that requirement of the setbacks. But the vacation of the easement is not a concern of The City's right now and they have no problem vacating the easement. Just to get it off the property and it's free and clear. Vice-Madam Chair Mackenzie-Chavez asked why the two easements are put in. CB replied that the subdivisions were platted at different times. This one was first and when Southfork Subdivision came in the easement was placed on this boundary line. Guessed maybe at the time they were anticipating to put electrical lines through there. But the way that it's configured now, it's not required or needed to serve the property. If this is ever subdivided they'll probably have to extend on the backside. Commissioner Long asked to view the displayed GIS Map with the water, sewer and electric layers off. CB showed the water line that runs a length of Patton Drive and where the sewer line terminates and picks back up going north. Showed where there's a void in the sewer. Commissioner Miller asked about electric. CB showed where the electric runs on the frontage, which is underground. Commissioner Miller asked if there's any natural gas in the area or is it on propane. CB said he doesn’t know because they don't service the gas. He deferred the question to property owner, Leo Fisher. Mr. Fisher stated that all the houses do have gas, but it's all through the street. Commissioner Kozeliski asked if they approve to vacate the land, is the carport actually going to be located on that vacated land. He noted requirement of 10 foot setback from boundary line. CB clarified that the side yard setback for MH-1 zone is 10 feet for the principal structure and 5 feet for accessory structures. By vacating the 10 foot easement it will give the property owner an extra 5 feet to work with. But the property owner will have to be setback a minimum of 5 feet if it's detached. Chairman Wilson added that it's 10 feet if it's attached. CB responded that was correct. Chairman Wilson asked if anyone wanted to speak in favor of this case to approach the podium and state their name. Property owner, Leo Fisher stated that he does own both sides (lots) and understands the codes. He’s previously served on City Council for California. Estimated the length from the existing structure to the property line is about 35 feet, which includes the easement. The structure he wants to put up is 18 feet wide and thinks if they vacate he will satisfy the 10 feet. He researched and agrees to why the garage would need to be up against the structure. But would allow him to go within 5 feet of the property line and still have that distance from the property line to the structure that he wants to put in and there's still a 10 foot gap. He appreciates the consideration and the help of CB and Roman. This is a structure he’s been wanting and it’ll help increase his property value. The acre and a half beside it, which they own will never be built on. All power, all water and all electric is on the street. Claims the easement has been there almost 18 years. Being that it’s trust land behind them, it'll be a long shot to ever build on that; no reason to put electric, water or power through there. Previously spoke with the utility & water departments who said the same thing as well. Hope they can help him with this and make his life easier. If not, will have to go back to the drawing board. Thanked Commission. Chairman Wilson asked if there were any questions by Commissioners. No questions. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9th, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Chairman Wilson stated anyone wishing to speak against this case, this is your time to come to the podium and state your name. No opponents. Chairman Wilson stated the hearing is closed. Motion to approve or deny the request for Case Number 2017-01000001. Commissioner Long motioned for approval of Item Two. Seconded by Commissioner Kozeliski, A.V.A. Motion Carried. Upon roll call, the votes were: Commissioner M. Long (Yes) Commissioner F. Kozeliski (Yes) Chairman K. Wilson (Yes) Vice-Madam Chair K. Mackenzie-Chavez (Yes) Commissioner F. Pawlowski (Yes) Commissioner L. Miller (Yes) CB reminded Commission that the approval tonight is for recommendation to City Council for approval of this request. Explained to Mr. Fisher that he'll have to go before City Council on August 22nd for final approval. They will carry this recommendation to Council. ITEM THREE: CASE # 17-01100003: Review Open Meetings Act for ratification of corrections to Resolution # RP2017-11 adopting The Open Meetings Act. CB stated this is the ratification of corrections to the resolution that was adopted in January 2017. After going through training he noticed there were certain things left out of the ordinance. The main one was the City's website, which has now been added to this resolution. Also the language in the original resolution referred them to the Land Development Standards section that deemed the reasonable time period. The section that they referred to didn't have that in it, so it was removed. He went off the boilerplate resolution that was provided in his materials at the training. So now it’s in compliance with the language for the resolution, per state law. Tonight he is asking for the Commission to ratify corrections to this resolution and adopt a new Open Meetings Act resolution that'll carry them through December. In January they'll adopt a new one. Chairman Wilson asked if there were any questions by Commissioners. No questions. Chairman Wilson stated the hearing is closed. Motion to approve or deny the request for Case Number 2017-01100003. Commissioner Pawlowski motioned for approval of Item Three. Seconded by Vice Madam Chair Mackenzie-Chavez, A.V.A. Motion Carried. Upon roll call, the votes were: Commissioner F. Pawlowski (Yes) Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9th, 2017 Page 4 of 5 Vice-Madam Chair K. Mackenzie-Chavez (Yes) Commissioner F. Kozeliski (Yes) Commissioner M. Long (Yes) Commissioner L. Miller (Yes) Chairman Wilson clarified that this will not have to go before the City Council; they've completed the ratification process. INFORMATION ITEMS ITEM FOUR: City Council Actions Taken ITEM FIVE: May, June & July 2017 Building Permit Activity Report Commission Adjourned at 6:25 p.m. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION KENT WILSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: CLYDE (C.B.) STRAIN SECRETARY TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting August 9th, 2017 Page 5 of 5 Planning & Zoning Commission September 13, 2017 Project Team Introduction ❑ New Mexico-based firms ✓ Bohannan Huston, Inc. – Subdivision Regulations & Annexation Policies ✓ Dekker/Perich/Sabatini – Zoning Code update ❑ Statewide planning experience ❑ Experience in public/private industry ❑ Work in Gallup and other communities in New Mexico ❑ Current experience on the City of Albuquerque zoning code update Overview of the Land Development Process Growth Management Plan (i.e. Comprehensive Plan or General Plan) ❏ Defines the community vision ❏ Policy document - provides guidance but is not a regulatory document Land Use Regulations - implement the community vision and ensure health, safety, and welfare ❏ Zoning code – Identification of districts or zones that determine land uses and allowable activities within a parcel ❏ Subdivision regulations – Provide an orderly system for designating and developing parcels of land ❏ Annexation policy – Guidance regarding the locations that may be incorporated into the City of Gallup; ensure that future annexations are consistent with the Growth Management Plan LDS Update & Growth Management Plan The LDS Update will build on the efforts of the Growth and Management Plan Growth Management Plan describes community goals for physical, social, and economic development. The document was adopted by Gallup City Council in 2016. Purpose of the Plan: ❑ Set community vision for growth ❑ Guide land use decisions ❑ Balance competing interests ❑ Set policies for range of issues, including housing, transportation, economic development, and land use ❑ Guides the expenditure of public funds What the project IS What the project IS NOT ❑ Simplify the code and make it user- ❑ Change previously agreed upon friendly policies regarding the future of the City of Gallup ❑ Make complex procedures easier to understand ❑ Rezoning of individual parcels ❑ Align with the goals of the Growth ❑ Substantial changes to currently Management Plan allowable land uses ❑ Clarify review and approval processes ❑ Consolidate zoning districts and use regulations Project Scope / Schedule ● Diagnostic Report: Identify issue areas in AUGUST SEPTEMBER/ DECEMBER existing code Diagnostic OCTOBER Module 2 Report Module 1 ● Module 1: Draft Zone FEBRUARY MARCH District & Use Regulations Comments will Planning & JANUARY be addressed Zoning ● Module 2: Draft Zoning & Module 3 in the final Commission Subdivision Standards document Meeting ● Module 3: Draft Administration & All Modules and opportunities to comment will Procedures be available on the City of Gallup website. Best Practices for Land Development Standards ❑ Simple & user-friendly ❑ Strong linkages to Growth Management Plan ❑ Encourage investment ❑ Streamline review procedures ❑ Create flexible standards ❑ Protect neighborhoods ❑ Promote more sustainable development Progress to Date ❑ Review of existing Land Development Standards ❑ Steering Committee meetings ❑ Stakeholder meetings: ❑ Board of Realtors ❑ Main Street and Business Improvement District ❑ Public meeting (August 1) ❑ Diagnostic Report available online ❑ Module 1 (zone districts and allowable uses) Diagnostic Report Overview ❑ Establishes goals and general action items for LDS Update ❑ Reflect feedback from Steering Committees, stakeholders, and general public ❑ Identifies area where City of Gallup code could be updated to reflect best practices ❑ Specific updates to the code to be consistent with Diagnostic Report ❑ Outline proposed structure for LDS Update Diagnostic Report – Zoning: Updated List of Zone Districts 1 2 RHZ RR Rural holding zone district Rural residential district ❑ The LDS contain a large number of 3 RS1 Single-family residential district 4 RS2 Single-family residential district districts, many of which are very 5 RSOD Single-family residential overlay district similar in nature. 6 7 RAD RATH Residential attached duplex district Residential attached townhouse district ❑ Zone districts have been evaluated to 8 RM3 Multiple-family residential district 9 RM4 Multiple-family residential mixed use determine whether they can be district 10 RM5 Multiple-family residential district streamlined, either by eliminating or 11 MH1 Mobile home subdivision residential district consolidating existing districts, or 12 MH2 Mobile home park residential district introducing new ones. 13 14 C1 C2 Neighborhood commercial district General commercial district ❑ District updates follow a legislative 15 C3 Heavy commercial district 16 PSC Planned shopping center district process that use a standard set of 17 I Industrial district decision rules to revise districts 18 IP Industrial park district citywide. 19 PUD Planned unit development overlay district 20 CCD Central city overlay district 21 PMU Planned mixed use district 22 BID Business improvement district Diagnostic Report – Zoning:Modernize the Land Use Classification System ❏ Use tables that are currently organised by land use category (i.e. residential, commercial, industrial) will be into one cross-district table ❏ Uses will be updated and consolidated into fewer, broader categories. 11 Diagnostic Report – Zoning: Add Illustrations, Tables, and Flowcharts Diagnostic Report – Zoning: Organization of Development Standards ❑ Locate Development Standards in one cross- district table ❑ Evaluate standards and update as needed ❑ To be addressed in Module 2  Diagnostic Report – Zoning: Clarify the Review and Approval Procedures ❑ Clarify development procedures (i.e. zone changes, variances, conditional uses, etc.) authorized by the zoning code. ❑ Land development procedures should be rewritten in a consistent format with a consistent level of detail. ❑ Addressed in Module 3 Diagnostic Report - Subdivision Regs: Definitions Subdivision Type Definitions and Thresholds Utilities Requirements ● Clarify: subdivisions with more units than minor subdivision threshold, but without need for transportation or utilities infrastructure ● Clarify: deferrals where utilities access exists via alley Diagnostic Report - Subdivision Regs: Application Process and Procedures ❑ Ensure consistency between code and City of Gallup practices ❑ Create checklist of Plat submittal requirements ❑ Clarify pre-application meeting procedures ❑ Role of Gallup Task Force and Developer Review Meeting Diagnostic Report - Subdivision Regs: Other Updates Parks Requirements ❑ Revise formulas and thresholds for new parks ❑ Address the fact that it is difficult for the City of Gallup to maintain existing parks Design Standards ❑ Consolidate standards located in multiple places ❑ Update to reflect best practices ❑ Additional guidance, as appropriate Module 1 Table of Contents ❏ Zone Districts ❏ Establishment and Conversion of Districts ❏ Zone District Summaries ❏ Base Zones ❏ Overlay Zones ❏ Use Regulations ❏ Use Table ❏ Use Specific Regulations Zone District Conversions - Residential NEW Zone District Conversions - Mixed-Use NEW Zone District Conversions - Non-Residential Zone District Conversions - Overlays NEW Base Zone District Summaries Overlay Zone District Summaries Use Consolidation ● Uses were updated and consolidated into fewer, broader categories. Updated Use Table = Existing NEW Entitlements = New Entitlements READ Use Table Update ❑ Residential Use Categories ❑ Industrial Use Categories Household Living Manufacturing, Production and Group Living Extraction ❑ Civic & Institutional Uses Waste and Salvage ❑ Commercial Use Categories Wholesaling and Storage Agriculture ❑ Transportation Uses Animal Care ❑ Telecommunications & Utilities Uses Food and Beverage ❑ Accessory Uses Recreation and Entertainment ❑ Temporary Uses Lodging Motor Vehicle-Related Offices and Services Retail Sales Use Specific Standards New Standards Existing Standards Use Specific Standard Examples  Thank you C.B.Strain Aaron Sussman cstrain@gallupnm.gov asussman@bhinc.com 505-863-1244 505-923-3341 Denise Aten Jessica Lawlis daten@bhinc.com jessicaj@dpsdesign.org 505-980-6065 505-338-5709  ZONING DISTRICT CONSOLIDATION te Upda DRAFT ZONE DISTRICT SUMMARY TABLE Non-Residential Districts Current Zone District Proposed Zone District Comments Base Districts Residential Districts Rural Residential (RR) Rural Residential (RR) Remains. Single-family Residential (RS1) Single-family Residential (RS2) Consolidated to one residential zone that contains subdistrict to Single Family Residential, Detached (SFR) accommodate the varying lot sizes and dimensions. Single-family Residential Over- lay (RSOD) Residential Attached Duplex Becomes a use with use specific standards, permissive in a (RAD) number of residential districts. Residential Attached Town- Multi-Family Residential Low (MFRL) Remains but will become a multi-family low density district. house (RATH) Multiple-family Residential Multi-Family Residential Medium (MFRM) Remains. (RM3) T Multi-Family Residential High (MFRH) New, to accommodate multi-family residential over 20 du/ac. Mobile Home Park Residential F Mobile Home Park (MHP) Consolidated into one district. (MH2) Mobile Home Subdivision Res- Eliminated idential (MH1) A Mixed-Use Districts R Multiple-family Residential (RM5) Consolidated into one Neighborhood Mixed-Use District intend- Multiple-family Residential Neighborhood Mixed-Use (MXN) ed to allow limited neighborhood-serving commercial uses in Mixed-use (RM4) D predominantly residential areas. Neighborhood Commercial (C1) Converted to a Mixed-use Center, a higher-intensity mixed-use General Commercial (C2-A) Mixed-Use Center (MXC) district for activity centers, like the Downtown, that allows a mix of uses including commercial, office, and higher-density residential. Non-Residential Districts Remains but will be stripped of permitted uses to allow to func- Rural Holding Zone (RHZ) Rural Holding Zone (RHZ) tion as intended, a pure “land holding zone”. General Commercial (C2-B) General Commercial (GC) Remains. Heavy Commercial (C3) Consolidated, planned shopping centers standards retained use Planned Shopping Center Heavy Commercial (HC) specific standards. (PSC) Industrial (I) Industrial (I) Consolidated into one industrial district. Industrial park (IP) Eliminated, expensive to implement and the intent can be Planned Mixed Use (PMU) achieved through a PUD. Remains, but becomes a base district with use and dimensional Planned Unit Development Planned Unit Development (PUD) standards rather than an overlay. Content updated to provide Overlay (PUD) greater flexibility. Overlay Districts Remains, but receives additional provisions tailored to the unique Central City Overlay (CCOD) Central City Overlay (CCO) environment of the Downtown. Business Improvement District Overlay Business Improvement (BID) Remains. (BIDO) New overlay that allows contextual standards to be applied to the Character Protection Overlay (CPO) older portions of the city to accommodate established develop- ment patterns. Remains, but becomes a protection overlay rather than a base Airport Zoning Airport Protection Overlay (APO) zone district. Remains, but becomes a protection overlay rather than a base Floodplain Zoning Floodplain Protection Overlay (FPO) zone district.  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 2  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 3  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 4  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 5  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 6  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 7  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 8  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 9  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 10  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 11  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 12  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 13  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 14  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 15  CONSOLIDATED USES & DEFINITIONS te Upda F T R A D 16  USE REGULATIONS te Upda F T R A D 17  USE REGULATIONS te Upda F T R A D 18  USE REGULATIONS te Upda F T R A D 19  USE REGULATIONS te Upda F T R A D 20  USE REGULATIONS te Upda F T R A D 21  USE REGULATIONS te Upda F T R A D 22  Summary of City Council Actions September 2017 August 22nd, 2017 : Case # 17-01000001: Vacation request by Leo Fisher, property owner, for The City of Gallup to vacate the 10 Foot Public Utility Easement (P.U.E.) north of Mr. Fisher’s property in order to construct a carport 5 feet from property line. Approved (Ordinance No. S2017-4)  CITY OF GALLUP PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 110 W. AZTEC AVENUE GALLUP, NM 87301 (505) 863 - 1240 MONTHLY COMPILATION OF PERMITS ISSUED CITY OR COUNTY: MAILING ADDRESS: GALLUP, McKINLEY COUNTY, NM P.O. BOX 1270, GALLUP, NEW MEXICO 87305 MONTH OF : AUGUST YEAR TO DATE: 2017 NUMBER OF NUMBER OF VALUATION VALUATION DESCRIPTION PERMITS PERMITS NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 2 $ 440,000.00 9 $ 1,710,000.00 RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 5 $ 63,850.00 16 $ 317,949.00 RESIDENTIAL STORAGE SHED 0 $ - 0 $ - RESIDENTIAL GARAGES & CARPORTS 1 $ 1,500.00 2 $ 9,000.00 RESIDENTIAL SITE PERMITS 0 $ - 1 $ 9,000.00 NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 1 $ 2,100,000.00 2 $ 2,125,000.00 COMMERCIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 3 $ 7,106,000.00 18 $ 7,940,140.00 COMMERCIAL STORAGE SHED 0 $ - 1 $ 2,640.00 COMMERCIAL GARAGES & CARPORTS 0 $ - 0 $ - COMMERCIAL SITE PERMITS 0 $ - 2 $ 9,019,894.00 NEW CHURCHES 0 $ - 0 $ - CHURCH ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 0 $ - 0 $ - RE-STUCCO / SIDING 0 $ - 16 $ 71,300.00 NEW ASPHALT / ASPHALT OVERLAY / STRIPING 4 $ 10,200.00 20 $ 756,819.00 EXCAVATION / GRADING 0 $ - 2 $ 350,300.00 NEW APARTMENTS 0 $ - 0 $ - APARTMENT ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 0 $ - 0 $ - HOTELS / MOTELS 0 $ - 0 $ - ROOF REPAIR 15 $ 92,592.00 76 $ 906,944.00 DEMOLITION 2 $ 6,000.00 5 $ 50,966.00 FENCE / RETAINING WALL 3 $ 8,795.00 16 $ 63,523.00 FOUNDATION ONLY - CHARGE 1 $ 25,000.00 1 $ 25,000.00 FOUNDATION ONLY - NO CHARGE 0 $ - 0 $ - SWIMMING POOLS 0 $ - 1 $ 50,000.00 DECKS 0 $ - 0 $ - TOTAL PERMITS 37 $ 9,853,937.00 188 $ 23,408,475.00 TOTAL FEES $ 45,358.22 $ 121,707.52  CITY OF GALLUP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY COMPILATION OF PERMITS ISSUED AUGUST 2017 DATE PERMIT PERMIT BLDG. & OWNER / BUSINESS CONTRACTOR SITE ADDRESS VALUATION ISSUED NO. TYPE ZONING FEES REHOBOTH CHRISTIAN COMMERCIAL 8/1/17 17-88 LAM CORPORATION 321 TSE YAANIICHI ST. $ 27,219.13 $ 7,000,000.00 HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION NEW SINGLE 8/1/17 17-136 KHALAF INVESTMENTS PALO DURO HOMES 1010 LA PALOMA ST. $ 1,551.28 $ 220,000.00 FAMILY RESIDENCE NEW SINGLE 8/1/17 17-138 KHALAF INVESTMENTS PALO DURO HOMES 1022 LA PALOMA ST. $ 1,551.28 $ 220,000.00 FAMILY RESIDENCE GALLUP LUMBER & COMMERCIAL 8/3/17 17-186 GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 1724 S. 2ND ST. $ 205.00 $ 17,000.00 SUPPLY CO. RE-ROOF RESIDENTIAL 8/3/17 17-187 KENNETH CRAIG GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 1709 S. CLIFF DR. $ 48.00 $ 1,400.00 RE-ROOF 8/4/17 17-147 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO. B D CONSTRUCTION CORP. 154 COUNTY RD 1 NEW COMMERCIAL $ 10,069.13 $ 2,100,000.00 RESIDENTIAL 8/7/17 17-170 MARGARET MENAPACE GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 411 E. HILL AVE. $ 96.00 $ 5,225.00 RE-ROOF DONALD DOTY JR. 8/7/17 17-190 KROUTH CONSTRUCTION 1202 W. AZTEC AVE. DEMOLITION $ 83.70 $ 3,000.00 C/O WELDON COBB DONALD DOTY JR. 8/7/17 17-191 KROUTH CONSTRUCTION 1204 W. AZTEC AVE. DEMOLITION $ 108.70 $ 3,000.00 C/O WELDON COBB RESIDENTIAL 8/7/17 17-196 LINDA MONTOYA DOMINGUEZ CONSTR. 313 E. JEFFERSON AVE. $ 78.00 $ 3,986.00 RE-ROOF RESIDENTIAL 8/8/17 17-193 BRIAN NICHOLSON HOMEOWNER 1422 S. GRANDVIEW DR. $ 158.55 $ 8,000.00 ADDITION SEALCOAT & 8/8/17 17-195 GOLDEN CORRAL CARRILLO PAINTING, INC. 510 N. 11TH ST. $ 75.00 $ 2,700.00 STRIPING RESIDENTIAL 8/9/17 17-192 PATRICK AHRENS GEM CONSTRUCTION 503 NAVAJO DR. $ 171.60 $ 8,588.00 ADDITION COMMERCIAL 8/10/17 17-197 PEDRO CONZALES GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 1006 W. MALONEY AVE. $ 115.00 $ 6,100.00 RE-ROOF 200 HEMLOCK RESIDENTIAL 8/10/17 17-198 PEDRO CONZALES GALLUP ROOFING, INC. $ 96.00 $ 5,500.00 CANYON TRAIL RE-ROOF PRUDENCIO & RESIDENTIAL 8/10/17 17-199 GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 813 N. STRONG DR. $ 114.00 $ 7,700.00 PAULINE DIMAS RE-ROOF RESIDENTIAL 8/10/17 17-200 IRFAN & RIFFAT QURESHI GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 1406 S. GRANDVIEW DR $ 87.00 $ 5,000.00 RE-ROOF AMERICAN STEEL RESIDENTIAL 8/14/17 17-194 ERNIE ARELLANES 802 W. LOGAN AVE. $ 65.75 $ 1,500.00 CARPORTS INC. GARAGE / CARPORT 8/16/17 17-201 JOHN CARDONA HOMEOWNER 109 W. WILSON AVE. FENCE $ 87.00 $ 5,000.00 MINOR 8/16/17 17-204 FRANK COLAIANNI HOMEOWNER 385 PHILIPINA AVE. $ 315.15 $ 20,000.00 ALTERATIONS 8/16/17 17-205 ALFONSO ROMERO HOMEOWNER 304 E. JEFFERSON AVE. FENCE $ 60.00 $ 2,000.00 RESIDENTIAL 8/17/17 17-208 TOMMY DIAZ HOMEOWNER 404 ROCKY VIEW CIR. $ 78.00 $ 3,500.00 RE-ROOF COMMERCIAL 8/18/17 17-203 RIO WEST MALL TERAN BUILDERS, LLC 1300 W. MALONEY AVE $ 576.80 $ 41,000.00 ALTERATIONS RESIDENTIAL 8/21/17 17-207 JOEL QUINONES HOMEOWNER 804 COUNTRY CLUB DR. $ 184.65 $ 10,000.00 ALTERATIONS RESIDENTIAL 8/23/17 17-215 FRED STEPHENS DOMINGUEZ CONSTR. 1720 S. CLIFF DR. $ 105.00 $ 6,295.00 RE-ROOF 8/25/17 17-212 ROUTE 66 DINER GALLUP FENCE CO. 2502 E. HIGHWAY 66 FENCE $ 88.55 $ 1,795.00 SEALCOAT & 8/28/17 17-180 LA BARRACA PRO-TECH SURFACING 1303 E. HIGHWAY 66 $ 75.00 $ 2,000.00 STRIPING PARK N SHADE OF COMMERCIAL 8/28/17 17-185 BETHANY CHURCH 1110 S. STRONG DR. $ 868.50 $ 65,000.00 TUCSON, INC. ADDITION RESIDENTIAL 8/28/17 17-209 ORR FAMILY GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 2801 MAZON AVE. $ 96.00 $ 5,500.00 RE-ROOF RESIDENTIAL 8/28/17 17-210 ORR FAMILY GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 2803 MAZONE AVE $ 96.00 $ 5,800.00 RE-ROOF VISTA DEL SOL COMMERCIAL 8/28/17 17-211 GALLUP ROOFING, INC. 800 S. 3RD ST. $ 96.00 $ 5,500.00 APARTMENTS RE-ROOF DIAZ RESIDENTIAL 8/30/17 17-216 CECILIA STAFFORD 513 E. MESA AVE. FOUNDATION $ 380.40 $ 25,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SEALCOAT & 8/30/17 17-218 MOTEL 6 OWNER 3306 W. HIGHWAY 66 $ 75.00 $ 2,500.00 STRIPING SEALCOAT & 8/30/17 17-219 TRAVELODGE OWNER 3275 W. HIGHWAY 66 $ 75.00 $ 3,000.00 STRIPING RESIDENTIAL 8/30/17 17-222 AVELARDO LUJAN DOMINGUEZ CONSTR. 2811 RADOSEVICH AVE. $ 114.00 $ 7,586.00 RE-ROOF RESIDENTIAL 8/31/17 17-213 ROBERT KERCHER RENEW ELECTRICK, LLC 507 SANDSTONE PL. $ 289.05 $ 17,262.00 SOLAR PANELS RESIDENTIAL 8/31/17 17-227 NITYA SUNDARAM MCKELLY ROOFING, LLC 2703 RADOSEVICH AVE. $ 105.00 $ 6,500.00 RE-ROOF TOTAL: $ 45,658.22 $ 9,853,937.00 2 NEW SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 5 RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 1 RESIDENTIAL GARAGES & CARPORTS 1 NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 3 COMMERCIAL ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS 4 NEW ASPHALT / ASPHALT OVERLAY / STRIPING 15 ROOF REPAIR 2 DEMOLITION 3 FENCE / RETAINING WALL 1 FOUNDATION ONLY - CHARGE 37 TOTAL PERMITS P.O. Box 1270 , Gallup, NM 87305 Phone: (505) 863-1240 Fax: (505) 722-5131