Council Study Session
Regular MeetingGilbert, AZ · April 16, 2024
Minutes
MINUTES OF THE GILBERT TOWN COUNCIL, IN SPECIAL MEETING FOR A STUDY
SESSION, TUESDAY, APRIL 16, 2024, AT 5:00 PM, MUNICIPAL BUILDING I, COUNCIL
CHAMBERS, 50 E. CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, GILBERT, ARIZONA
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Brigette Peterson, Vice Mayor Scott Anderson,
Councilmembers Chuck Bongiovanni, Bobbi Buchli, Yung
Koprowski, Kathy Tilque, and Jim Torgeson
COUNCIL ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Town Manager Patrick Banger, Town Attorney Chris Payne,
Town Clerk Chaveli Herrera, Deputy Clerk Judy Martinez,
Redevelopment Program Manager Amanda Elliott, and Parks
and Recreation Director Robert Carmona
CALL TO ORDER OF SPECIAL MEETING
Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
AGENDA ITEM
1. Discussion and presentation on Northwest Gilbert Redevelopment and Revitalization
Public Outreach.
Redevelopment Program Manager Elliott spoke on the redevelopment, revitalization, and
reinvestment of Northwest Gilbert. She discussed that reinvestment could be likened to
when a home needed maintenance to avoid disrepair. She stated data and public feedback
were used to determine how and where Gilbert should focus their reinvestment efforts. She
gave an example of updating a kitchen and likened it to Northwest Gilbert with ideas of
updating streetscapes, infrastructure improvements, or enhanced park amenities.
She stated Urban Land Institute was brought in to determine the optimal time for the
reinvestment and revitalization effort based on the data and outreach. There was an
extensive outreach process which included online surveys, business walks, in-person
meetings, and virtual open houses, which resulted in public feedback, and the creation of a
website landing page. She detailed the toolbox available from the State of Arizona used for
redevelopment that municipalities could use to aid in the prevention or elimination of signs
of decline. The statute allowed access for 10 years as long as the community had a
community-driven plan for reinvestment in place. She explained that redevelopment
worked to breathe new life into areas that had signs of social, physical, environmental, or
economic conditions that led to decline. The purpose was to prevent signs of decline or
eliminate decline from happening. She discussed how the redevelopment of the downtown
Heritage District had led to a reduction in neglect, increased reinvestment, increased
property values, and increased sales tax revenue. She clarified that the downtown Heritage
District was an entertainment district, but that was not the same focus for the Northwest
Gilbert area. She said Northwest Gilbert was unique and talked about the importance of
employment, residential, and supporting neighborhood commercial and not mirroring the
downtown density or entertainment. She presented the three boundary options the public
had seen and explained those to the Council. She discussed the different data collected to
help determine the boundaries and what the needs were within those areas. She discussed
how other communities funded facade improvement programs by utilizing Community
Development Block Grant funds and American Rescue Act funds. She said that the
business community and residents wanted them to focus on safety and eliminate loitering.
She emphasized that they were not currently developing goals and strategies, but they had
feedback that would allow them to work with the public to examine opportunities and
determine funding sources once they were ready.
She explained that when they were asked to seek public feedback on a boundary, the
Lindsay boundary was recommended for Northwest revitalization. The boundary did not
split neighborhoods and captured 30% of non-Homeowners Association (HOA)
neighborhoods, addressed 60% of aging properties of 40+ years old, had more connectivity,
reached the greatest number of individuals on a fixed income, and had the most
opportunity to solve calls of service.
Councilmembers Tilque and Buchli stated they were supportive of the Lindsay boundary for
the Northwest Revitalization.
Councilmember Koprowski stated she was also in support of the Lindsay boundary and
said the streetscape was an important element for enhancing that area and was already
included in other projects. She wanted to ensure they were doing their part to invest in that
area of Town as well.
Councilmember Torgeson requested clarification in future discussions on why the Lindsay
boundary was preferred.
Councilmember Bongiovanni stated he was impressed by what had been presented,
adding he was looking forward to it and agreed with the Lindsay boundary area.
Vice Mayor Anderson discussed the natural evaluation that cities went through. He said
that fit into it perfectly, as did the Lindsay boundary.
Mayor Peterson discussed not wanting to turn Gilbert into a city and said the Lindsay
boundary was the cleanest. She discussed the data considerations. She stated a decision
would be necessary concerning the homes that faced the road and whether the boundary
would be the centerline or the east boundary of Lindsay Road.
Redevelopment Program Manager Elliott shared the next steps including sending emails
for seeking feedback from the public and through the landing page. She said the hope was
to be before the Council in June for the boundary adoption, then to begin goals and
strategy development with public engagement in August and September 2024.
2. Discussion and presentation on Wildlife Feeding.
Parks and Recreation Director Carmona stated the current discussion was a follow-up
from a previous Study Session in December 2023 on the wildlife feeding ordinances and
proposed an option or two for the next steps in the process. He mentioned that when
discussing wildlife feeding, it started with the Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) program. He
added that program was permitted on private property but not on Town-owned property,
according to the ordinance. He stated the initial wildlife feeding ordinance had focused on
not feeding the wildlife at the Riparian Preserve. Then in 2018 a new ordinance was
adopted and included no feeding on any Town-owned properties or public right-of-way. He
discussed what implementation and reporting to consider in a one-year plan to aid
nonprofits providing TNR services. He said the item was before them for any additional
recommendations from the Council.
Councilmember Tilque stated they had looked at other communities to compare and she
liked the funding for nonprofits but wished them to go further from there. She wanted the
nonprofits they partnered with to respond promptly and have the necessary expertise. She
said she was willing to start at $10,000 to be put in a fund and noted the need for a
tracking mechanism and a way to measure if it was successful. She said they wished to
make sure that a resident or HOA would know who to contact for assistance.
Vice Mayor Anderson asked about the number of nonprofits that may be competing for
dollars. Parks and Recreation Director Carmona stated there were a lot of nonprofits
providing those services; he knew of four to five and would reach out to them to walk
through those steps to learn what would work best.
Councilmember Koprowski asked about how it would affect residents for wildlife on public
or private properties. Director Carmona stated they would work with the nonprofits to
inform them that assistance would be available on private property only.
Councilmember Buchli asked who would administer the program. Director Carmona stated
those details were still being arranged but their department would likely take the lead in
setting up the program and then work with the Manager’s Office to determine what the
long-term solution would be for the community. Councilmember Buchli asked who would
be monitoring the budget and where funds would go. Director Carmona stated he would
look to his team and the budget team to consider options.
Councilmember Bongiovanni stated it would be difficult to provide funding without data on
the issue. Director Carmona stated that part of the recommendation for a one-year pilot
program would include reporting data on the TNR and colonies.
ADJOURN
Mayor Peterson adjourned the meeting at 5:50 p.m.
ATTEST:
___________________________ ___________________________________
Brigette Peterson, Mayor Chaveli Herrera, Town Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of the
Study Session of the Town Council of the Town of Gilbert held on the 16th day of April,
2024. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was
present.
Dated this __________ day of ______________, 2024.
___________________________________
Chaveli Herrera, Town Clerk
Agenda
Council Study Session Agenda
April 16, 2024
Brigette Peterson, Mayor ● Scott Anderson, Vice Mayor
Chuck Bongiovanni ● Bobbi Buchli ● Yung Koprowski ● Kathy Tilque ● Jim Torgeson
Members may attend in person or by telephone.
Municipal Building I, Council Chambers
4/16/2024 5:00 PM
50 E. Civic Center Drive
Gilbert, Arizona
Study Sessions are open to the public. Discussion of agenda items is reserved for the Council and
Staff. No decisions are made or action taken during the Study Session.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Discussion and presentation on Northwest Gilbert Redevelopment and
Revitalization Public Outreach.
2. Discussion and presentation on Wildlife Feeding.
ADJOURN
NOTICE TO PARENTS: Parents and legal guardians have the right to consent before the Town of Gilbert makes a video or
voice recording of a minor child. A.R.S. 1-602.A.9. Gilbert Council Meetings are recorded and maybe viewed on Gilbert Live
website. If you permit your child to participate in the Council Meeting, a recording will be made. If your child is seated in
the audience your child may be recorded, but you may request that your child be seated in a designated area to avoid
recording. Please submit your request to the Town Clerk.
Get email alerts for Gilbert
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.