Council Subcommittee
Regular MeetingGilbert, AZ · August 27, 2020
Minutes
MINUTES OF THE GILBERT COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE ON AZ CARES ACT, AUGUST 27
2020, AT 3:00 P.M., VIRTUAL MEETING, GILBERT, ARIZONA
COUNCIL PRESENT: Chair Aimee Yentes and Councilmembers Yung Koprowski
and Scott September
COUNCIL ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Town Manager Patrick Banger, Deputy Town Clerk Chaveli
Herrera, Town Attorney Chris Payne, Parks and Recreation
Director Robert Carmona, Office of Management and
Budget Director Kelly Pfost, Office of Intergovernmental
Affairs Director Rob Bohr, Department of Economic
Development Director Dan Henderson, Community
Response Supervisor Melanie Dykstra, Assistant Fire Chief
Rob Duggan
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Yentes called the meeting to order at 3:04 pm
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of August 21, 2020
A MOTION was made by Councilmember September, seconded by Councilmember
Koprowski, to approve the minutes of the meeting of August 21, 2020. Motion carried
3-0.
2. Review of outstanding items from previous meeting.
There was no discussion.
3. Review, discussion and possible action of the Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) and assistance for non-profit organizations.
Community Response Supervisor Dykstra provided and update on a proposed timelines
as a result of Council direction. She discussed focus areas, recommendations, the
opening and review of applications, and the expected timelines for contract approvals.
She provided additional information on the process.
Councilmember September thanked Community Response Supervisor Dykstra for her
update and asked for clarification on the possibility of a Special Meeting for Council
approval. Chair Yentes confirmed that the direction would be for a Special Meeting and
the anticipated date would be the end of September or early October. She stated that it
should be as soon as possible, depending on what that would look like logistically.
Community Response Supervisor Dykstra discussed the potential volume of applications
received and stated she would work with the Clerks Office to schedule a Special
Meeting.
4. Review, discussion and possible action of the public process and community
engagement.
Parks and Recreation Director Carmona provided information on the community
engagement efforts.
5. Update from Town team reviewing Economic Reimbursements due to COVID -19
Accounting Manager Wright provided an update on the funding and expense
reimbursement for the Town. She provided information on FEMA Public Assistance,
Community Development Block Grant COVID-19, Local Area Transportation Assistance
Cares, AZ Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental funding (ACESF), Coronavirus
Emergency Supplemental Funding (CESF), CARES Act Relief Fund. She shared
information on expenses incurred by the Town.
Chair Yentes asked about turn-around time to which Accounting Manager Wright
provided clarification on the timelines associated with various grants. She outlined the
accomplishments achieved by Team 4 and discussed the various items the Team was
currently working on.
6. Review, discussion and possible action of assistance for business.
Economic Director Henderson provided information on the survey that was submitted
last week. He stated the survey was re-opened and shared through various town
channels as a means to amplify and ensure responses were being received. He offered
comparisons on the responses received in round 1 and round 2 and discussed recovery
and resiliency in business concerns and COVID impacts.
He provided information on a program approach to offer assistance to businesses and
provided information on Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the program. He stated the
tiered 3-phase approach would address the needs and wants of the business
community. Councilmember Koprowski asked about potential exclusion and risk of
abuse of the program. Economic Development Director Henderson discussed the areas
that were most impacted by visitor declines and mandatory state closures. He stated
that he was not in a position to address the exclusion and stated that the program
outlined provided recommendations to address short term and immediate needs.
Chair Yentes discussed the grants and the implementation of the process. Economic
Development Director Henderson discussed the wants and needs of businesses and
offered additional information on the importance of partnerships and compliance. He
provided information on Phase 2 and added additional clarification on the financial
support outlined in Phase 3. He reiterated that it was a 3-tiered program approach to
address short, mid and long-term business needs.
Councilmember September asked if any other jurisdictions had a similar approach.
Economic Development Director Henderson elaborated on the previous presentation
offered by Intergovernmental Affairs Director Bohr on what each level of government
was doing but stated that he had not seen a tiered approach that addressed every level
of need. He discussed the different buckets of needs, support and concerns.
Councilmember September asked how much money Phase 2 would require. Economic
Development Director Henderson elaborated on the need to move forward like a pilot
program while utilizing feedback and responding to the different needs of businesses.
Chair Yentes stated she was comfortable running with Phase 1 but walking through
Phase 2 and Phase 3 and discussed the importance of a preliminary allocation of funds.
Councilmember Koprowski spoke in agreement with focusing on Phase 1 and discussed
the similarity with the Maricopa County grant process. She spoke in favor of the
approach focusing on those with the greatest need but stated that she did not feel there
needed to be a limit to the number of employees. She discussed the long-term support
of Phase 2.
Chair Yentes discussed the importance of accountability and not packing assumptions
into the process. She asked for a deeper dive into how Maricopa County was conducting
their award system.
Councilmember September discussed the numbers with the business recovery program
and stated that he believed the dollar value could be determined between Phase 1 and
Phase 3 but did not feel it could be as easily identified in Phase 2. He discussed issues in
quantifying the information. He asked for further discussion on the Phase 1-dollar value
and asked what other groups would be funded. Chair Yentes stated some of the findings
should be broad based in nature and discussed continued needs and the importance of
funding priorities accordingly and allocated back directly.
Councilmember September stated he wanted to make sure the value they choose is the
right number. Chair Yentes discussed looking at another amount and the possibility of
putting a limit and if they came out under budget they can re-visit the allocation. She
stated she felt comfortable between a 7 to 10 million dollar range. Councilmember
September stated he felt comfortable assigning value to Phase 1 with the understanding
that the value was not written in stone and can be re-visited.
Councilmember Koprowski discussed the possibility of applications exceeding the value
and the need to have a second phase of releasing funds if needed. Councilmember
September asked for clarification on how that money would be assigned. Chair Yentes
stated that funds should be allocated back to residents and should be returned back to
the taxpayer. Councilmember Koprowski asked for clarification on general obligation
bonds and whether a tax increase would be required.
Economic Development Director Henderson provided information on programs being
first come first served but discussed other categories and impacts to other businesses.
Councilmember September asked about the need to accommodate other groups that
weren’t included in Phase 1. Mr. Henderson discussed the use of sub-categories and
allocation of additional grant funds.
Chair Yentes asked for a general consensus and direction to staff. Councilmember
Koprowski requested the removal of the restriction on the number of employees in
Phase 1 and asked for the opportunity to include other codes that support other
businesses in need. She proposed a total allocation of 9 million and discussed the
benefit and impact to businesses.
Councilmember September asked for clarification on the removal of the restriction on
the number of employee’s. Councilmember Koprowski discussed the importance of
small businesses and parameters already in place. Chair Yentes stated that she was
comfortable with the recommendations.
Councilmember Koprowski asked Economic Development Director to prepare guardrails
or criteria that surrounds the applications. Mr. Henderson discussed the different needs
of each business and offered an explanation as to why guard rails were not in place
already but stated that guard rails can be built in and the concept can be scaled.
Councilmember Koprowski discussed the importance of accountability and reporting
how funding was helping the businesses. She wanted to make sure the funding was
helping those in need. Councilmember September spoke in agreement but also stated
that it was hard to determine all the ways a business will need t use their money and
stated guard rails would be helpful to ensure accountability and reporting.
7. Review, discussion and possible action of assistance for residents.
Community Response Supervisor Dykstra provided background information on the
residential side and offered information on what partners have been doing.
Management and Budget Director Pfost provided information on the requested items.
She discussed financial policies and outlined the use of revenue. She provided
information on tax or fee reductions and discussed options on utility rates, business
license fees, sales tax and food tax. She discussed the option of a credit for health-
related purposes and stated that it would take roughly 9 million to give a $100 benefit
for all those impacted.
Chair Yentes discussed the use of one-time monies for continuing purposes and stated it
was a question of broader policy. She discussed the food tax and talked about taking
sustainable measures.
Councilmember Koprowski discussed the utility rates with recycling and the future
increase in costs and asked when it would be implemented. Management and Budget
Director Pfost stated that it depended on the timing and elaborated on the higher rate
change if we waited. She discussed the impact into the next fiscal year and stated there
would be a 2.5 million dollar gap. Councilmember Koprowski stated that she would
support postponing or delaying additional fees and she would entertain more
information on removing food tax for home consumption and discussed the price tag on
the health care option. She outlined the need to balance needs.
Councilmember September discussed the option of eliminating food tax and questioned
whether that would benefit families right now. He stated that he would rather spend
money on immediate needs than broad based decisions. Chair Yentes offered additional
discussion on food tax eliminations and it being a sustainable investment.
8. Next steps including timelines and checkpoints.
Councilmember September stated that he would like to see what was already funded
and what was not. He stated that he would also like to see the priorities of what was not
funded and circle back on phase 3 of the business plan. He discussed hearing more
about the public safety needs.
Chair Yentes stated she was hesitant to bring the needs of some departments forward
while not bringing others. She elaborated that she would like to have that conversation
with Council in the context of a Council Retreat. Councilmember September stated he
felt some of the money would go towards public safety to which Chair Yentes offered
clarification. Councilmember Koprowski stated that she would like to keep
conversations about public safety on the table but stated that with limited money there
are only two options. She stated that they need to continue with discussions on phase 2
and 3 of the businesses and proposed that more information on pubic safety can be
heard in a couple meetings from today. She stated that she preferred to flush out the
needs or businesses and resident options first.
The next meeting will be on September 3, 2020 at 3:00 p.m.
ADJOURN
Chair Yentes adjourned the meeting at 5:02 pm
ATTEST:
___________________________ ___________________________________
Chair Aimee Yentes Chaveli Herrera, MMC, Deputy Town Clerk
Agenda
Subcommittee on AZ Cares Act
8/27/2020 3:00:00 PM
Virtual Meeting
Gilbert, Arizona
MEMBERS MAY ATTEND IN PERSON OR BY TELEPHONE
MEETING ACCESS
Listening Via Conference Line Telephonically
A conference line will be available in order to listen to the Town Council meeting. The
conference line number and access code for this meeting are:
+1-415-655-0001 Access code: 133 038 2376
WebEx Online Meeting Platform
Members of the public and Town staff will also have the availability to participate in Town
Council meeting via WebEx.
The WebEx registration link is:
https://gilbertaz.webex.com/gilbertaz/onstage/g.php?MTID=e8b93bda2829eab296c5928
054928f1cb
Pre-registration is encouraged. If you are not able to pre-register on WebEx, you may still
have the opportunity to view the meeting via WebEx.
If you have any issues accessing the WebEx platform, the link to WebEx technical support is
below.
• WebEx Technical Support (1-866-229-3239)
CALL TO ORDER
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Approval of the minutes of the meeting of August 21, 2020.
2. Review of outstanding items from previous meeting.
3. Review, discussion and possible action of Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) and assistance for non-profit organizations.
4. Review, discussion and possible action of the public process and community
engagement.
5. Update from Town team reviewing Economic Reimbursements due to COVID-19.
6. Review, discussion and possible action of assistance for businessess.
7. Review, discussion and possible action of assistance for residents.
8. Next steps including timelines and checkpoints.
ADJOURN
Get email alerts for Gilbert
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.