Redevelopment Commission
Regular MeetingGilbert, AZ · February 19, 2025
Minutes
TOWN OF GILBERT
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Gilbert Municipal Center
Council Chambers
50 E. Civic Center Drive, Gilbert, AZ
February 19, 2025
COMMISSION PRESENT: STAFF PRESENT:
Casey Kendel, Chair John Baird, Deputy Town Attorney
Cassandra Updike, Vice Chair Jim Torgeson, Council Liaison
Adam Baugh Amanda Elliott, Redevelopment Program Manager,
Boe Bigelow Office of Economic Development
PRESENTER:
Kristen Devine, Planner II, Development Services
Veronica Gonzalez, Principal Planner
CALL TO ORDER OF THE STUDY MEETING
Chair Kendel called the Study Meeting of the Redevelopment Commission to order at 6:01
p.m.
1. ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS: Discussion on proposed alley improvements located behind
the Exorwoods Building, adjacent to Water Tower Plaza, involving modifications to
pedestrian access, drainage, and emergency vehicle clearance. Kristen Devine (480) 503-6742.
Planner Devine introduced the proposed alley improvements located behind the Norwood
Building, adjacent to Water Tower Plaza. The project aims to provide a level transition
between two buildings following the removal of a previously existing structure that
encroached on the alley easement.
The proposal includes a speed table to raise the alley’s roadway, ensuring a flush connection
between the buildings. Additionally, a four-post shade sail canopy is proposed to provide
coverage. Engineering concerns regarding drainage compliance and emergency vehicle
access are under review.
COMMISSION QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
Commissioner Baugh inquired whether the speed table was intended as a traffic-calming
measure or if its purpose was solely to create a level walkway between buildings. Planner
Redevelopment Commission
February 19, 2025
1
Devine clarified that the speed table’s primary function is to provide a flush transition
between the front and rear buildings and is not intended to regulate traffic speed.
Commissioner Baugh also questioned whether the alley would be designated for vehicular
or pedestrian traffic and how the speed table might impact circulation patterns. Planner
Devine stated that vehicular access is still under review, and the final designation of the
space has not yet been determined.
Commissioner Updike raised concerns regarding the fire safety requirements of the canopy
and whether the shade sail material would meet fire code standards. Planner Devine
confirmed that the canopy would be removable and that fire sprinklers would be installed
on either side of the structure as required by code.
Commissioner Updike inquired whether the two adjacent buildings were of equal height
and whether future building additions could alter wind patterns within the alley. Planner
Devine acknowledged that the potential wind tunnel effect was a valid concern and would
need further assessment.
Commissioner Bigelow requested clarification on the speed table height and its impact on
accessibility. Planner Devine stated that the proposal currently calls for a two-foot height,
but modifications may be necessary to ensure proper drainage and accommodate fire truck
clearance.
Chair Kendel questioned the necessity of the canopy, noting that the space is an alley, not a
designated gathering area. Planner Devine explained that the canopy was primarily
intended for aesthetic purposes, creating a covered transition between the two buildings
that mimics the previous enclosure before it was removed.
Chair Kendel raised concerns regarding fire truck clearance and the drainage impact of the
raised speed table. Engineering staff confirmed that clearance must meet the 15.5-foot
requirement for emergency vehicles. Development Engineering Manager Tom stated that
stormwater drainage remains a major concern, and further analysis is required before the
design can be approved.
Commissioner Bigelow asked whether the speed table and canopy would be easily
removable in case of future maintenance or utility work.
Engineering staff confirmed that the canopy could be disassembled as needed, but the
speed table would require demolition to remove, making it a more permanent structure.
Commissioner Bigelow inquired about responsibility for maintenance and removal costs
should the speed table need to be demolished for utility access.
Redevelopment Commission
February 19, 2025
2
Engineering staff clarified that the property owner would be financially responsible for
removal and restoration under the terms of an encroachment agreement with the town.
Commissioner Baugh commented on the broader implications of the alley improvement
proposal, emphasizing that while the design aims to accommodate the property owner’s
request for a level transition between buildings, the town’s right-of-way must remain a
priority. He noted that the alleyway has historically been public space, and while
adjustments have been made over time to meet business needs, the town has an obligation
to maintain its easements and ensure public access is not compromised. He acknowledged
that the Redevelopment Commission is being asked to consider a unique accommodation,
and while the speed table and canopy may provide functional benefits, the town must also
weigh long-term accessibility, emergency response needs, and infrastructure maintenance.
CALL TO ORDER OF THE REGULAR MEETING
Chair Kendel called the Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Commission to order at 6:21
p.m.
ROLL CALL
Amanda Elliott, Redevelopment Program Manager, conducted a roll call, and the quorum
was confirmed. TJ Claassen was absent.
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS
At this time, members of the public may comment on matters not on the agenda. The
Commission's response is limited to responding to criticism, asking staff to review a matter
commented upon, or asking that a matter be put on a future agenda.
There were no citizen comments.
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
Meeting Minutes: Consider approval of the minutes of the regular meeting held on
November 20, 2024.
MOTION: Commissioner Baugh moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the
Redevelopment Commission held on November 20, 2024, as presented, seconded by
Commissioner Bigelow.
Motion passed 4-0.
Redevelopment Commission
February 19, 2025
3
PUBLIC HEARING
Items will be heard at one Public Hearing, at which time anyone wishing to comment on a
Public Hearing Item may do so. Comments will be heard from those in support of or in
opposition to an item. To comment on a Public Hearing Item, individuals must fill out a
public comment form indicating the Item Number on which they wish to be heard. Once
the hearing is closed, there will be no further public comment unless requested by a
member of the Commission. After the Public Hearing, the Commission may act on all items
that do not require additional staff, public, or Commission comments with a single vote.
2. DR24-103 HERITAGE NORTH: Consider approval of the 25% increase signage request
for the Heritage North Sign Program for approximately 9.9 acres, located at the southwest
corner of Gilbert Road and Juniper Avenue, zoned Heritage Village Center (HVC) with a
Planned Area Development (PAD) overlay. Kristen Devine (480) 503-6742.
Commissioner Baugh recused himself from the discussion.
Planner Devine presented the Heritage North Sign Program, originally approved in 2022,
which now requires modifications to the phasing plan and signage allowances for the 9.9-
acre site, located at the southwest corner of Gilbert Road and Juniper Avenue. The
development includes nine buildings with a mix of commercial, residential, and public
uses, necessitating a comprehensive signage strategy to ensure cohesion with the district’s
architectural and historical character.
A key feature of the sign program update is the proposed rooftop sign, measuring 187.5
square feet. The applicant has requested the option to increase the sign size to 250 square
feet, which exceeds the Land Development Code (LDC) maximum but could be permitted
with Commission approval. The redevelopment plan also introduces structured tenant
frontages, categorized into three distinct signage zones based on location and building type:
F1 Historic Frontage (Gilbert Road) – Intended to preserve the district’s historical
character, this frontage allows wall, projecting, suspended, awning, canopy, and
painted signs. Neon signage is encouraged to reflect the vintage aesthetic of the
Heritage District, aligning with traditional downtown commercial storefronts.
F2 Flexible Frontage (Commons Core) – Designed to accommodate both historic and
contemporary sign styles, this frontage allows a broader range of signage while
discouraging face-lit pan-channel letters, which are typically associated with modern
retail chains. The goal is to encourage unique and creative signage that integrates
with the surrounding architectural elements.
F3 Neighborhood Frontage (Most Restrictive) – This frontage applies to multi-family
residential buildings and parking structures, where sign allowances are highly
Redevelopment Commission
February 19, 2025
4
regulated. Signs in this zone cannot exceed 14 feet in height and must not be
illuminated to minimize disruptions to nearby residents.
Additionally, neighborhood identification signs were introduced into the sign program.
These signs will be classified as wall signs, meaning their square footage will count against
the total allowable signage for each respective building. This could potentially limit tenant
signage options, leading the applicant to request a 25% increase in signage allowances to
compensate for the square footage impact of these identification signs.
Planner Devine stated that the proposed modifications align with the Heritage District’s
redevelopment objectives while ensuring adequate signage opportunities for businesses.
However, staff is continuing to assess the potential impact of the requested variances,
particularly regarding signage visibility, pedestrian wayfinding, and maintaining the
district’s historic integrity.
COMMISSION QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
Commissioner Bigelow expressed support for increasing the rooftop sign size to 250
square feet, stating that it would serve as a landmark feature and a recognizable photo
opportunity for the town. He stated that the increased sign size would be more visible
from key entry points into the district and would align with the town’s character and
branding goals.
Chair Kendel raised concerns regarding sidewalk signage, particularly A-frame signs, and
whether their placement might contribute to visual clutter or obstruct pedestrian
pathways.
Planner Devine confirmed that businesses would be permitted to use A-frame signs, but
they must be placed directly in front of the respective business and removed after business
hours to prevent excessive clutter on sidewalks. She further clarified that the Heritage
District’s Land Development Code (LDC) establishes specific restrictions on placement,
ensuring that signs do not interfere with accessibility requirements or pedestrian
movement.
Chair Kendel inquired about advertising opportunities for second-floor tenants,
questioning whether businesses located on upper levels would have adequate visibility
under the current signage regulations.
Planner Devine explained that second-floor tenants are not permitted to have wall-
mounted signage but may utilize window signage covering up to 25% of the window area.
This restriction is intended to maintain aesthetic consistency across building facades and
prevent excessive or intrusive signage in multi-story structures.
There were no citizen comments.
Redevelopment Commission
February 19, 2025
5
MOTION: Vice Chair Updike moved to approve DR24-103 Heritage North, seconded by
Commissioner Bigelow. Commissioner Baugh abstained. Motion passed 3-0.
3. Z25-01 LDC TEXT AMENDMENT: Consider approval of a text amendment to the Land
Development Code (LDC) Section 6.1.9(A) regarding the Redevelopment Commission
Membership, allowing the addition of an alternate member to serve in cases of
Commissioner absence.
Principal Planner Gonzalez presented the proposed LDC Text Amendment, which would
introduce the addition of one alternate member to the Redevelopment Commission. This
alternate would be appointed by the Mayor and serve a one-year term. The role of the
alternate would be limited to filling in only in cases of an absence, ensuring that the
Commission could consistently maintain a quorum during meetings
COMMISSION QUESTIONS/COMMENTS
Commissioner Baugh expressed support for the amendment, noting that frequent recusals
often create quorum issues, which can delay decision-making and hinder the Commission’s
ability to conduct business efficiently. He noted that, given the specialized nature of the
Redevelopment Commission, recusals are common and should be anticipated in procedural
planning. He identified that having an alternate member would help ensure consistency
and prevent delays when recusals occur.
Vice Chair Updike inquired whether the alternate member could fill in for recusals, rather
than just absences, highlighting that recusals are often more frequent than unexcused
absences on the Commission.
Town Counsel John Baird clarified that the Planning Commission's alternates only fill in for
absences, but there is no statutory restriction preventing the Redevelopment Commission
from modifying the proposal to include recusals as well. He explained that while allowing
alternates to step in for recusals is not common practice, the Redevelopment Commission
has the authority to adopt its own procedures if it chooses to expand the alternate’s role.
There were no citizen comments.
MOTION TO AMEND: Commissioner Baugh moved to amend Z25-01 to include recusals as a
valid reason for the alternate member to participate, seconded by Commissioner Bigelow.
Motion to amend passed 4-0.
MOTION: Commissioner Baugh moved to approve Z25-01 LDC Text Amendment, as
amended, seconded by Commissioner Bigelow. Motion passed 4-0.
COMMUNICATIONS
Redevelopment Commission
February 19, 2025
6
REPORT FROM THE CHAIR ON CURRENT OR FUTURE EVENTS
Chair Kendel had no updates to report.
REPORT FROM THE STAFF LIAISON ON CURRENT OR FUTURE EVENTS
Council Liaison, Jim Torgerson thanked Chair Kendel and Vice Chair Updike for continuing
their leadership roles through November 2025. He announced the return of the Heritage
District Concert Series, featuring live music every Thursday in March from 6:30 to 8:30
p.m. at Water Tower Plaza. Torgerson also noted that the Gilbert Elementary Kindness and
Service Club’s "Spread Gilbert Kindness" Postcard Project, which showcases student
artwork on postcards available at Liberty Market, Joe’s Real BBQ, and Snooze.
Additionally, he reminded the Commission of the upcoming Council Workshop on the
Heritage District, scheduled for March 6, 2025, at the University Building from 8:30 a.m. to
4:00 p.m.
ADJOURN REGULAR SESSION
Chair Kendel adjourned the meeting at 6:52 p.m.
_______________________________
Casey Kendel, Chair
Redevelopment Commission
February 19, 2025
7
Agenda
Gilbert Redevelopment Commission
Agenda
February 19, 2025
6:00 PM
Members may attend in person or by telephone.
Casey Kendel, Chair ● Cassandra Updike, Vice Chair
Adam Baugh ● Boe Bigelow ● TJ Claassen
Council Liaison: Jim Torgeson ● Staff Liaison: Amanda Elliott
Council Chambers
50 East Civic Center Drive
Gilbert, Arizona
AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE DISCUSSED IN A DIFFERENT SEQUENCE.
ITEMS WILL NOT BE DISCUSSED PRIOR TO POSTED MEETING TIME.
The Redevelopment Commission is very appreciative of the honor to serve. In performing our roles and
functions, we use iPads and/or laptops at our meetings as well as monitors on the dais, which contain the
materials of the agenda items before us this evening. If you notice our eyes on these electronic devices, it is
not due to lack of attentiveness to speakers, as we are actively listening to all who are speaking and at the
same time following along in our packets that the staff has prepared for us this evening.
Remote Viewing
For those who want to view Redevelopment Commission meetings without attending in person, a
live stream of the meeting will be broadcast online at https://gilbertaz.gov/gilbertlive. Meetings
are also recorded and available for view anytime on YouTube.
Members of the public who want to address the Redevelopment Commission may either attend in
person or submit comments via an online comment card.
Online Comment Card
At least one hour before the Redevelopment Commission meeting, submit an online public
comment card and indicate whether you are for or against the public hearing item. Online
comment cards not submitted by the deadline will not be read at the meeting.
AGENDA ITEM
CALL TO ORDER OF THE STUDY SESSION
1 ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS: Review of improvements proposed for the alley
located at the rear of 216 North Gilbert Road, and zoned Heritage Village Center
(HVC). Kristen Devine (480) 503-6742.
ADJOURN STUDY SESSION
CALL TO ORDER OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ROLL CALL
COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITIZENS
At this time, members of the public may comment on matters not on the agenda. The
Commission's response is limited to responding to criticism, asking staff to review a
matter commented upon, or asking that a matter be put on a future agenda.
ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
2 Meeting Minutes - Consider approval of minutes for the Regular meeting held
on November 20, 2024.
PUBLIC HEARING
Items will be heard at one Public Hearing; at which time anyone wishing to comment
on a Public Hearing Item may do so. Comments will be heard from those in support of
or in opposition to an item.
In order to comment on a Public Hearing Item, you must fill out a public comment form,
indicating the Item Number on which you wish to be heard. Once the hearing is closed,
there will be no further public comment unless requested by a member of the
Commission. After the Public Hearing, the Commission may act on all items not
requiring additional staff, public, or Commission comment with a single vote.
3 DR24-103 HERITAGE NORTH: Heritage Sign Plan for approximately 9.9 acres,
generally located at the southwest corner of Gilbert Road and Juniper Avenue,
and zoned Heritage Village Center (HVC) with a Planned Area Development
overlay (PAD). Kristen Devine (480) 503-6742.
4 Z25-01 LDC TEXT AMENDMENT: Request to amend the Town of Gilbert Land
Development Code, Chapter 1 Zoning Regulations, Section 6.1.9 Redevelopment
Commission. The effect of the amendment will be to address Redevelopment
Commission membership and make technical and conforming changes.
Veronica Gonzalez (480) 503-6720.
COMMUNICATIONS
Executive Session – The Public Body may convene into an executive session at one or
more times during the meeting as needed to confer with the Town Attorney for legal
advice regarding any of the items listed on the agenda as authorized by A.R.S. §38-
431.03.A.3.
Report from CHAIR on current or future events
Report from COUNCIL LIAISON on current or future events
Report from COMMISSIONERS on current or future events
Report from STAFF LIAISON on current or future events
ADJOURN REGULAR MEETING
NOTICE TO PARENTS: Parents and legal guardians have the right to consent before the Town of Gilbert makes a video
or voice recording of a minor child. A.R.S. 1-602.A.9. Gilbert Commission Meetings are recorded and maybe viewed on
Channel 11 and the Gilbert website. If you permit your child to participate in the Commission Meeting, a recording will
be made. If your child is seated in the audience your child may be recorded, but you may request that your child be
seated in a designated area to avoid recording. Please submit your request to the Town Clerk.
Get email alerts for Gilbert
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.