Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · February 23, 2022
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Jeffrey Anzevino
John Funyak
William Ray
Shane Reid
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Alicia Schrenk, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
Absent: 1 - Mr. Reid
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, to approve the Consent
Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
A. AHBR 22-112 7631 Andover Way
Addition (Covered Terrace & Deck)
Attachments: 7631 Andover Way (Revised)
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 23, 2022
A. AHBR 22-47 116 West Streetsboro Street
Commercial Exterior Alteration (Exterior Façade Renovation - Acme Store)
Attachments: 116 W Streetsboro - Revised Plans 2.22.22
116 W Streetsboro - Revised Plans 2.18.22
116 W Streetsboro - Existing Photos 1.26.22
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by reviewing the previous informal review of the site
plan, noting the applicant is providing additional information to the Board.
A.J. Sands, Albrect Inc., Justin Bailey, Acme Fresh Market, Greg Ernst, AoDK Architecture,
described and provided the landscape plan, the design of the islands, the photometrics of the
light plan, displayed the renderings of the proposed work on the building and described
changes to the plan that was informally reviewed as well as the pharmacy drive thru. Mr. Ernst
also discussed the locations where the new project will meet the existing, that the entire roof
will be replaced and noted he has samples of the proposed materials.
The Board, staff and applicant noted a crosswalk will be established near the pharmacy and
that signage will be brought to the Board at a later date.
Mr. Workley made a motion to approve the application with the dominate elements returning
using the same material as the facade and the full roof be replaced. The motion was approved
by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 22-111 53 First Street & 17 West Streetsboro Street
Demolition (Commercial Buildings - Former Merino Building & Prestige Building)
Attachments: Demolition Plans
Park Lane Square
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application for a Finding by displaying the site plan, describing
the building to be demolished, noted no alternations are proposed in the application to the
Baldwin Buss House and reviewed the staff recommendations. Mr. Sugar noted this proposal
is to allow work to begin on this aspect of the project.
Mr. Joseph Matava and Mr. Nate Bailey, Peninsula Architects, were present for the meeting.
The Board briefly discussed the structures proposed to be demolished.
Ms. Marzulla made a motion, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the AHBR finds the proposed
structures for demolition at 53 First Street and 17 West Streetsboro Street do not have
historic or architectural significance. Further, the Board finds that the applicant for a
permit to demolish these structures will not voluntarily consent to the retention of this
building. The motion was passed by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 23, 2022
B. AHBR 22-104 5 Atterbury Boulevard, Suite 2
Sign (Building Window Sign - Puffy’s Vapor Lounge)
Attachments: 5 Atterbury Blvd, Suite 2 (Revised)
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by reviewing the staff comments and noting the
building owner approved the proposed sign
Mr. Brian Becker, Becker Signs, noted the proposed sign is built using materials and
construction similiar to the previous sign. Mr. Becker also noted only one of the signs in the
area matches the staff requested metal and that the proposed sign is 60 percent of the sign
panel area.
The Board, staff and applicant discussed and displayed the PVC sign material which will be
painted with a flat paint, the additional weight of thicker material and noting the existing
lighting will be used.
A motion was made by Mr. Funyak, seconded by Mr. Anzevino, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
C. AHBR 22-96 3056 Middleton Road
Fence (4’ Black Chain-link Fence)
Attachments: 3056 Middleton Rd (Revised)
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying the site, describing the project, the
location of the fence, the proposed screening recommendations and reviewing the staff
comments. Ms. Schrenk also noting the application was begun before the recent LDC change
which prohibited chain link fence.
Mr. Jack Williams, Williams Fence and Contracting, noted he had an agreement with the
homeowner prior to the recent LDC change and described the screening to be used.
The Board, staff and applicant discussed: The homeowners have already purchased the chain
link fence, that the screening requirements will be met, no trees will be removed for the fence
or screening installation, one side of the property is park land, that the homeowner did call
Community Development on October 12, 2021, to inquire about chain link fence. The Board
noted with the facts of this application a precedent is not being set if the fence is allowed and
the durability of the vinyl covered fence.
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Funyak, to approve the application with the
addition of dense screening along the fence which is adjacent to the neighbors side of the
property. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 23, 2022
D. AHBR 22-37 820 Ridgewood Boulevard
Addition (Screened Porch)
Attachments: 820 Ridgewood Blvd (Final Revised)
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by describing and displaying the site plan and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Matt Lucy, Lucy Renovations, described how some of the exterior is being planned
around the homeowners interior design, the exterior materials will match the existing vinyl
siding and terminate at the corner or will be toothed in if the exterior wall is a flat plane. The
Board noted the drawings are difficult to understand and does not reflect the entire project,
however, in general the style is acceptable.
This matter was continued
E. AHBR 22-56 2230 Olde Farm Lane
Addition (Attached Garage)
Attachments: 2230 Olde Farm Lane (Revised)
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project,
noting the project will be reviewed by BZBA for a variance and reviewed staff comments.
Mr. Leonard Huddleston, LDS Specialists, noted the valley on the back of the property will tie
into the existing garage with two drops while the front will have a separate drop to the new
addition. Mr. Huddleston also stated he will label the trim on the drawings.
The Board, staff and application discussed pulling the addition forward about a foot which
will eliminate the roof valley problem and that all the siding and roof will be replaced.
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve with the condition that the
applicant work with staff to adjust the addition position one-foot to resolve the roof valley
comment and the edge trim be labeled. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
F. AHBR 22-99 2819 Pioneer Trail
Addition (2nd Story, Front Portico, Windows)
Attachments: 2819 Pioneer Trail
Alternate Elevation
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying and describing the project, displaying
an alternate window if the oval window is not approved and reviewing the staff comments.
Ms. Rebecca Pantuso, Pantuso Architecture, noted the siding will be toothed in with the
existing siding and described the purpose for the oval window.
The Board, staff and applicant discussed the oval window and agreed that only one support
bracket is preferred on each side above the triple window to the left, on the front elevation.
Mr. Workley made a motion to approve, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, with the following
conditions: The siding and roof be toothed in and the oval window be approved plus only one
bracket be placed on each side above the triple group front windows. The motion was approved
by the following vote:
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 23, 2022
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
G. AHBR 22-101 7608 Yennicook Way
Addition (Garage & Great Room Additions, Patio)
Attachments: 7608 Yennicook Way
Site Plan
Roof Plan
Ms. Schrenk introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Dan Bestic, homeowner, noted the architect stated the shingles will be blended into the
existing two-year old shingles.
The Board, staff and applicant discussed the shed roof which will cover part of the patio for
rain purposes.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Funyak, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 23, 2022
A. AHBR 21-1248 Darrow Road Townhomes (Informal Review)
New Residential Construction (33 Unit Townhomes - District 3)
Attachments: Staff Memo to AHBR - Townhomes Informal 2.23.22
Letter to AHBR 2.23.22
Site Plan Proposal 2.23.22
Proposed Elevations & Floor Plans 2.23.22
Townhomes Informal Plans 1.12.22
Mr. Sugar introduced the application by displaying and describing the project, noting this is
the second informal review by AHBR and that the applicant has submitted a revised site plan
which Mr. Sugar detailed. Mr. Sugar also noted the front facing garage doors are a departure
from the LDC, are forward from the main mass and the front of the facade is dominated by the
garage doors and side-by-side driveways. Mr. Sugar also reviewed the staff comments and
examples of possible changes that will minimize the dominance of the garage doors.
Mr. Dave Gruenwald and Mr. Don Sutcliff, Drees Homes, described the new site plan, noted
the LDC requires one building which is straight across but does describe the concept of
exceptional design regarding a town home. Mr. Gruenwald also noted there is a community
demand for first-floor master bedrooms. With regard to the staff examples of potential designs,
Mr. Gruenwald stated they will result in more blacktop and less green space.
Mr. Sutcliff noted he believes the front loading garage will meet the needs of the Hudson
community and contain architectural features which are desired by Hudson, but are not
required, and will be incorporated into the design.
The Board, staff and applicant discussed the process of the application, the open space in the
site plan and the segmentation study of the Hudson which is partially guiding the proposed
design. The Board members discussed the front loading garage doors, the look of 'the garage
doors across the front with a house on top' and the proportions of the various elements of the
town homes. Also discussed was possibility of a variety of garage doors being used. Mr.
Sutcliff stated a desire to make these townhouses fit the surrounding neighborhood houses.
The Board commented on the need to see the five-unit buildings as opposed to only two and
three unit buildings in the present design. Side load units were encouraged by Board
members.
Mr. Sutcliff noted that he is confident the majority of units will be first floor master bedrooms
with some second floor masters.
Mr. Sugar summed up the AHBR comments as being: Farm house elements, side loading
garages on end units, a variety of garage doors, research to minimize garage door prominence.
Mr. Gruenwald noted the site plan will be revised taking into account side loading garages and
the general layout.
This matter was discussed
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 23, 2022
B. AHBR 2-9-22 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
February 9, 2022
Attachments: AHBR Minutes February 9, 2022 - draft
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Anzevino, that the February 9, 2022,
Minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6- Mr. Anzevino, Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
VIII. Staff Update
Mr. Sugar noted the case loads are picking up and there will only be one March meeting.
This matter was discussed
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Mr. Funyak, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the meeting be adjourned. The
motion carried by an unanimous vote.
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions,
in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and
Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning
Commission.
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Jeffrey Anzevino
John Funyak
William Ray
Shane Reid
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Alicia Schrenk, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 22-112 7631 Andover Way
Addition (Covered Terrace & Deck)
Submitted by Brandon Hayes, Acute View
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 7631 Andover Way (Revised)
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 2/23/2022
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised February 23, 2022
A. AHBR 22-47 116 West Streetsboro Street
Commercial Exterior Alteration (Exterior Façade Renovation - Acme Store)
Submitted by Greg Ernst, AoDK Architecture
a) Staff notes the board received an introduction of this project on January
26, 2022. The board and applicant discussed the following: site
improvements, proposed materials, storefront design, raised roof,
pharmacy drive-thru area, transitions related to the end unit tenant
spaces, pilaster color to tie together buildings, parking spaces and
sidewalks.
b) The applicant received initial feedback from the board and has provided
full color renderings of the front elevation, samples of the proposed
materials, landscaping plan in compliance with PC Decision and cross
sections of the construction.
c) All depicted signage will be reviewed through a separate application.
Staff notes the Land Development Code permits one wall sign per
building unit.
d) Suggest some renovation to the end unit tenants’ details/features to have
better integration. The transition from the light brick to the dark red
brick facades of the adjacent tenants is a strong transition within same
building. The transition at the west end is eased somewhat due to the
inside corner and change from flat to pitched roof, neither of which are
present at the east end transition.
e) The brick facing at the pharmacy and entrance canopies should be
consistently applied of all sides of the mass rather than the minor return
proposed.
f) Question the limited amount of relief proposed at the solider course and
metal cap. Additional relief or dimension would help reduce the scale for
the building and provide some detailing to the secondary facades where
signage is not permitted by the Land Development Code standards.
Attachments: 116 W Streetsboro - Revised Plans 2.22.22
116 W Streetsboro - Revised Plans 2.18.22
116 W Streetsboro - Existing Photos 1.26.22
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 2/23/2022
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised February 23, 2022
A. AHBR 22-111 53 First Street & 17 West Streetsboro Street
Demolition (Commercial Buildings - Former Merino Building & Prestige Building)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Peninsula Architects
a) Staff notes the Board previously reviewed these buildings on September
22, 2021, as an informal review.
b) Staff notes the following buildings proposed to be demolished, 53 First
Street and 17 West Streetsboro Street.
c) The building at 17 West Streetsboro Street was built in 1989 and is a
non-contributing structure within the Historic District. The building at 53
First Street was built in 1946 and moved to its current location in the
early 2000s and is outside of the Historic District.
d) No alterations are proposed to the Baldwin-Buss House as part of this
application.
e) The AHBR shall make the following recommendation pertaining to the
demolition: The AHBR finds the proposed structures for demolition at 53
First Street and 17 West Streetsboro Street do or do not have historic or
architectural significance. Further, the Board finds that the applicant for
a permit to demolish these structures will not voluntarily consent to the
retention of this building.
Attachments: Demolition Plans
Park Lane Square
B. AHBR 22-104 5 Atterbury Boulevard, Suite 2
Sign (Building Window Sign - Puffy’s Vapor Lounge)
Submitted by Brian Becker, Becker Signs
a) Architectural Design Standards state sign should not exceed
approximately 70% of the height and length of the signable area of the
building. Indicate the width of the metal face and adjust the sign size to
meet the 70%.
b) Sign plan encourages use of cast or cut metal with a natural,
non-reflective finish. Question if such could be incorporated in design.
Attachments: 5 Atterbury Blvd, Suite 2 (Revised)
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 2/23/2022
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised February 23, 2022
C. AHBR 22-96 3056 Middleton Road
Fence (4’ Black Chain-link Fence)
Submitted by Jake Williams, Williams Fence and Contracting
a) Staff notes homeowner is proposing a 4 ft. black chain-link fence in rear
yard.
b) The recent LDC 2021 update revised fence regulations to prohibit
chain-link. Staff notes homeowner inquired about fence project prior to
2021 update. Homeowners made commitments with their contractors
based on their understanding of the code and substantial screening of
fence.
c) Document how the screening requirements have been met.
d) Staff suggests chain-link fence placement be at the edge of the mowed
lawn to maximize use of existing screening.
Attachments: 3056 Middleton Rd (Revised)
D. AHBR 22-37 820 Ridgewood Boulevard
Addition (Screened Porch)
Submitted by Matt Lucy, Lucy Renovations
a) Provide a scaled site plan to depict proposed project in detail.
b) Architectural Design Standards state all roofs in all the wings must be of
the same shape as the main body, but they may have a different pitch or
orientation. Staff notes existing house is a hip roof style whereas the
proposed screened porch is gable roof style.
c) Architectural Design Standards state wall materials should be blended to
ensure compatibility with existing materials. Question how siding and
materials would blend with existing materials on left elevation.
d) Architectural Design Standards state materials used in a screen room
need not be the same as other materials in the structure but should be
related to materials used in the details of the structure. Staff suggests
incorporating some details and materials to match the existing home.
Attachments: 820 Ridgewood Blvd (Revised)
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 2/23/2022
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised February 23, 2022
E. AHBR 22-56 2230 Olde Farm Lane
Addition (Attached Garage)
Submitted by Leonard Huddleston, LDS Specialists, LLC.
a) Staff notes applicant has submitted a variance application for the proposed
garage addition to be reviewed at the March 17, 2022, BZBA meeting.
b) Architectural Design Standards state roofs shall not intersect a wall so as
to cause a valley. Question the proposed design of the roof plan at the rear
elevation and if roof would drain appropriately.
c) Architectural Design Standards require the details in a wing to be similar
to the main body. Verify width of proposed window and garage door trim
will match the existing home.
d) Revise elevations to label proposed materials and verify they would
match existing house.
Attachments: 2230 Olde Farm Lane (Revised)
F. AHBR 22-99 2819 Pioneer Trail
Addition (2nd Story, Front Portico, Windows)
Submitted by Rebecca Pantuso, Pantuso Architecture
a) Architectural Design Standards state wall materials should be blended to
ensure compatibility with existing materials. Staff notes addition would be
on the same wall plane as existing. Question how siding and materials
would blend at rear elevation with existing materials.
b) Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public
faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a
system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Question if the oval
window interrupts the regulating lines.
Attachments: 2819 Pioneer Trail
Alternate Elevation
G. AHBR 22-101 7608 Yennicook Way
Addition (Garage & Great Room Additions, Patio)
Submitted by Daniel Bestic
a) Question how the roof shingles will be blended on the right elevation.
Attachments: 7608 Yennicook Way
Site Plan
Roof Plan
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 2/23/2022
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised February 23, 2022
A. AHBR 21-1248 Darrow Road Townhomes (Informal Review)
New Residential Construction (33 Unit Townhomes - District 3)
Submitted by Matthew Neff, M. Neff Consultants
a) Staff has prepared the attached memo to assist the AHBR review.
Attachments: Staff Memo to AHBR - Townhomes Informal 2.23.22
Letter to AHBR 2.23.22
Site Plan Proposal 2.23.22
Proposed Elevations & Floor Plans 2.23.22
Townhomes Informal Plans 1.12.22
B. AHBR 2-9-22 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
February 9, 2022
Attachments: AHBR Minutes February 9, 2022 - draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible
manner, an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic
preservation, with a vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 2/23/2022
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.