Muyni
← Back to Hudson

Architectural & Historic Board of Review

Regular Meeting

Hudson, OH · February 28, 2024

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Hudson, Ohio Meeting Minutes - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22. II. Roll Call Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley Absent: 1 - Mr. Funyak III. Public Comment Mr. James Field, Temple Beth Shalom, spoke regarding the reasons a revised door is not being presented to the AHBR Board while noting that a metal door will be proposed at a future AHBR meeting. Dr. Mimi Becker, Laurel Lake resident, and environmental scientist, noted her concern that AHBR is reviewing the Laurel Lake submission without visiting the site and other concerns regarding the Laurel Lake application. Chair Caputo noted a Public Comment was received by the Board from Hudson Heritage Association regarding 136 Aurora Street, which will be added to the record . IV. Consent Applications There were no items on the Consent Agenda. V. Old Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024 B. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District) Addition (1,763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch) Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect Attachments: 136 Hudson Street AHBR Packet 4.10.24 Meeting Perspectus Report - 136 Hudson Street - 3.8.2024 136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet 136 Hudson Street Material Specifications Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting AHBR members conducted a site visit on February 20, 2024, reviewed the application details and staff comments and concerns . Chair Caputo stated he believes the Historic Preservation Consultant should be involved in this application prior to any decision by the Board. Mr. Fred Margulies, architect, the Board and staff discussed the impact of the application being continued, the Secretary of the Interior's Preservation Brief, the proposed redesigned front door, and a walk-thru of the resubmitted submission. A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application be continued to allow a consultation with the historic preservation consultant. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley VI. New Business A. AHBR 23-977 7778 Valley View Road Accessory Structure (Pool house, 2,000sqft) Attachments: 7778 Valley View Rd. AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the 2000 square foot pool house, noting that BZBA granted a variance for the overall size of the pool house and setbacks, and reviewed the staff comments and recommendations. Ms. Krickovich also noted the pool house was built without a permit. Mr. Arthur Karas, applicant, the Board and staff discussed: The roof height and design, that the structure is not visible and approximately 1100-feet from Valley View Road, and that the transom windows on the pool house were intended to match the windows from the main house. A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be approved with the condition that the window trim match the trim on the main house. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024 B. AHBR 24-61 7659 Hudson Park Drive Addition (256sqft, Covered Deck) Attachments: 7659 Hudson Park Dr. AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing and displaying the project and reviewing the staff comments. Mr. Nicholas Hoover, Hover's Hardscapes, and Eric, noted the chimney is proposed to be lower than normal, made of stacked stone to match the rest of the project, and vents out the side. The Board discussed the materials, the design of the bay window, the location of the vent on the chimney, the cable railing material, and the roof materials. A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be approved with updated drawings of the cable railing posts in their proper location, and the bay window detail and box out. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley D. AHBR 23-11097585 N. Vinemont Ct. Addition (Covered Deck, 288sqft) Attachments: 7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet 3.13.24 Meeting 7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing and displaying the project and reviewing the staff comments and concerns. Mr. Kevin McCausland, McCausland Landscapes, and Mr. Frank Susnick, contractor, noted the panel siding will be used on the deck bottom, that a foundation is not needed for the deck, that the proposed chimney will match the existing chimney and is not shown on the elevation, alternatives to building a foundation, how the deck screening will be blended into the house siding, and the roof attachment to the house. The Board noted that revised drawing will be needed prior to the application being approved and that metal shed roofs have been allowed on the rear of the house. The application was continued. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024 E. AHBR 24-135 1727 Mayflower Lane Addition (Garage 896sqft) Attachments: 1727 Mayflower Ln. AHBR Packet 4.24.24 Meeting 1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet 4.10.24 Meeting Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet 3.13.24 Meeting 1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the project and reviewing the staff comments and concerns. Mr. Jeff Raggets, applicant, the Board and staff discussed: The revised drawings for the addition which must be subordinate to the main structure, the applicants problems of lowering the roof, that the size of the wing is larger than the main mass of the house, the possibility of making an L shaped addition and absorbing the addition into the main mass of the house, and the need for staff to review the revised drawing prior to the Board approval. The AHBR application was continued. VII. Other Business A. AHBR 7126 200 Laurel Lake (Informal Review) New Construction (Seven new villas) Attachments: Laurel Lake Informal Review AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the project and reviewed the staff's comments. Mr. Sugar explained the approval process and reviewed the LDC regarding front facing garages. Mr. John Ducatman, and Eilene Doss RDL Architects, described their process to date, and responded to staff's comments by: Noting the front of the proposed buildings are similar to the existing structures, that the attached garages fit the existing context of Laurel Lake, that architectural detail was added by varying the height of the stone band, that the bay windows match some of the existing bay windows and the hip roofs on the sunroom match some of the existing sunrooms and are on the back of the house. The Board comments include: The proposed units have a wider garage and gables than the existing units, recognition of the challenges of building on this campus, that the gables enhance the look of the structure, that the stone around the structure must be a consistent height, concern with the dormer over the entrance door, the bay window needs a foundation, the stone on the chimney should match the water table store, the possibility of upgrading the garage doors, and that the garage doors do not respect the standard of rear or side entry however they do keep the development consistent and this on a private drive which is more than 150-feet from a public road. This matter was discussed City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024 B. AHBR 2-14-2024 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: February 14, 2024 Attachments: February 14, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the February 14, 2024, Minutes be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley VIII. Staff Update Ms. Kirkovich noted March will have only one Board meeting. This matter was discussed IX. Adjournment A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this be adjourned at 9 p.m. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley ___________________________________________ John Caputo, Chair ___________________________________________ John Workley, Secretary ___________________________________________ Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission . * * * City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5

Agenda

City of Hudson, Ohio CD Meeting Agenda - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Public Comment IV. Consent Applications V. Old Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 2/27/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024 B. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District) Addition (1,763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch) Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect a) Staff notes the project went to AHBR on February 14, 2024. Staff and the Board commented on the flat roof & window design as well as the material of the proposed garage door and if these features were compatible with the overall historic nature of the home. The Board scheduled a site visit, which was conducted on February 20, 2024. b) The applicant has since submitted revised drawings that depicts a minimized flat roof area, changes to the window design, and a wood garage door material. c) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Enlarge windows on the east elevation to better meet the intent of this requirement. d) The Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Revise windows on east elevation to better comply with this requirement. e) The Secretary of Interior Standards state new additions shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Suggest the high windows have a more compatible design with the existing high windows. Attachments: 136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet 136 Hudson Street Material Specifications Legislative History 2/14/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued of Review VI. New Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 2/27/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024 A. AHBR 23-977 7778 Valley View Road Accessory Structure (Pool house, 2,000sqft) Submitted by Arthur Karas a) Staff notes the project went to the Board of Zoning & Building Appeals on February 15, 2024 and was granted a structure size variance as well as allowing the structure to be partially in the side yard. b) The Architectural Design Standards state the roof of an enclosed accessory building should be the same roof shape as the roof of the main structure. Staff notes the accessory structure will have a dutch gable roof and the house has a mix of gable and hip roofs. Question the porch roof and if it should be fully below the main mass roof. c) Revise the floor plan to depict the proposed windows. Attachments: 7778 Valley View Rd. AHBR Packet B. AHBR 24-61 7659 Hudson Park Drive Addition (256sqft, Covered Deck) Submitted by Nicholas Hoover, Hoover’s Hardscapes a) The Architectural Design Standards state all chimneys must match the foundation material. Question if the proposed chimney will match the existing exposed foundation. b) Question the roof and how it will intersect with the bay window on the rear elevation. c) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a foundation to match. The addition is proposed to have a metal roof while the existing house has a shingle material. Staff notes the roof will be over an open deck area. d) Submit right elevation to show how chimney ties into the proposed roofline. Attachments: 7659 Hudson Park Dr. AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 2/27/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024 D. AHBR 7585 N. Vinemont Ct. 23-1109 Addition (Covered Deck, 288sqft) Submitted by Kevin McCausland, McCausland Landscapes a) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a foundation to match. The applicant is proposing consistent deck material and trim to match the existing house. Question the panel siding and if a foundation should be incorporated. b) The Architectural Design Standards state roofs on projections should match the roof material of the building, and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof. The applicant is proposing a metal shed roof while the house has a shingled gable roof; however, would be located at the rear of the house. c) The Architectural Design Standards state all chimneys must match the foundation material. Fireplace vents, when incorporated, shall be located at the rear elevation. Revise elevations to depict the proposed chimney and how the materials relate to the existing chimney and foundation. Attachments: 7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 2/27/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024 E. AHBR 24-135 1727 Mayflower Lane Addition (Garage 896sqft) Submitted by Timothy Raggets a) The Architectural Design Standards state that wings may not be larger or taller than the main body of the structure. Staff notes the main body of the structure is approximately 1,051sf and the applicant is proposing to create a wing that is 1,383sf. Staff suggests breaking up the addition into multiple wings or masses to meet this requirement. Confirm the addition would not be taller than the main body. b) The Architectural Design Standards state replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade (rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing materials. The proposed addition would cause a 52 foot continuous wall span. Question how siding and roof materials will be blended. Suggest lowering the roof 18 inches to strengthen the presence of the main mass and address material blending. c) The Architectural Design Standards state the front face of the main body must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of the wings. The existing house is a two-story wing type with the wing extending forward of the main body. Creating a second-floor increases non-compliance with this requirement. Any second-floor massing should be significantly reduced in scale by lowering the ridge height and removing the reverse gable. The second-floor windows could be revised into a partial dormer. d) The Architectural Design Standards states in new construction, an attached garage may be located in a wing or in the main body, but must be entered from the side yard or from the rear. The proposed addition would further non-compliance from this requirement. e) The Architectural Design Standards state details in a wing must be consistently applied throughout the sides of that wing. Question the different heights of the garage doors of the proposed addition and if window trim would match the existing. Attachments: 1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet VII. Other Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 2/27/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024 A. AHBR 7126 200 Laurel Lake (Informal Review) New Construction (Seven new villas) Submitted by John Ducatman, RDL Architects a) Staff notes that Laurel Lake has requested an informal review by the Board to discuss their seven villa new construction project. Staff has some preliminary comments regarding the proposal. b) The Architectural Design Standards state the front face of the main body must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of the wings. Staff notes the proposal depicts the garage wings forward of the main mass. c) The Architectural Design Standards in state new construction, an attached garage may be located in a wing or in the main body, but must be entered from the side yard or from the rear. Staff notes the proposal depicts the garages forward facing; however, this would mimic the existing design. d) The Architectural Design Standards state the materials used in any mass must be applied consistently on that mass on all sides of the structure. Staff notes the proposal depicts the exposed foundation on the different sides of the mass. Suggest a more consistent height design. e) The Architectural Design Standards state projections on the ground floor should be carried through to the foundation. Revise elevations to show this requirement on the projections and bay window bump outs. f) The Architectural Design Standards State All roofs in all the wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may have a different pitch or orientation. Question the sunroom hip roof design when the rest of the roof shapes are gables. Attachments: Laurel Lake Informal Review AHBR Packet B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: 2-14-2024 February 14, 2024 Attachments: February 14, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft VIII. Staff Update IX. Adjournment * * * The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner, an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 2/27/2024

Get email alerts for Hudson

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting