Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · February 28, 2024
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
John Funyak
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley
Absent: 1 - Mr. Funyak
III. Public Comment
Mr. James Field, Temple Beth Shalom, spoke regarding the reasons a revised door is not
being presented to the AHBR Board while noting that a metal door will be proposed at a
future AHBR meeting.
Dr. Mimi Becker, Laurel Lake resident, and environmental scientist, noted her concern that
AHBR is reviewing the Laurel Lake submission without visiting the site and other concerns
regarding the Laurel Lake application.
Chair Caputo noted a Public Comment was received by the Board from Hudson Heritage
Association regarding 136 Aurora Street, which will be added to the record .
IV. Consent Applications
There were no items on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024
B. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (1,763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch)
Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect
Attachments: 136 Hudson Street AHBR Packet 4.10.24 Meeting
Perspectus Report - 136 Hudson Street - 3.8.2024
136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
136 Hudson Street Material Specifications
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting AHBR members conducted a site visit
on February 20, 2024, reviewed the application details and staff comments and concerns .
Chair Caputo stated he believes the Historic Preservation Consultant should be involved in
this application prior to any decision by the Board.
Mr. Fred Margulies, architect, the Board and staff discussed the impact of the application
being continued, the Secretary of the Interior's Preservation Brief, the proposed redesigned
front door, and a walk-thru of the resubmitted submission.
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR
Application be continued to allow a consultation with the historic preservation
consultant. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 23-977 7778 Valley View Road
Accessory Structure (Pool house, 2,000sqft)
Attachments: 7778 Valley View Rd. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the 2000 square foot pool house,
noting that BZBA granted a variance for the overall size of the pool house and setbacks, and
reviewed the staff comments and recommendations. Ms. Krickovich also noted the pool house
was built without a permit.
Mr. Arthur Karas, applicant, the Board and staff discussed: The roof height and design, that
the structure is not visible and approximately 1100-feet from Valley View Road, and that the
transom windows on the pool house were intended to match the windows from the main
house.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved with the condition that the window trim match the trim on the
main house. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024
B. AHBR 24-61 7659 Hudson Park Drive
Addition (256sqft, Covered Deck)
Attachments: 7659 Hudson Park Dr. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing and displaying the project and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Nicholas Hoover, Hover's Hardscapes, and Eric, noted the chimney is proposed to be
lower than normal, made of stacked stone to match the rest of the project, and vents out the
side.
The Board discussed the materials, the design of the bay window, the location of the vent on
the chimney, the cable railing material, and the roof materials.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved with updated drawings of the cable railing posts in their
proper location, and the bay window detail and box out. The motion carried by the
following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley
D. AHBR 23-11097585 N. Vinemont Ct.
Addition (Covered Deck, 288sqft)
Attachments: 7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet 3.13.24 Meeting
7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing and displaying the project and
reviewing the staff comments and concerns.
Mr. Kevin McCausland, McCausland Landscapes, and Mr. Frank Susnick, contractor, noted
the panel siding will be used on the deck bottom, that a foundation is not needed for the deck,
that the proposed chimney will match the existing chimney and is not shown on the elevation,
alternatives to building a foundation, how the deck screening will be blended into the house
siding, and the roof attachment to the house. The Board noted that revised drawing will be
needed prior to the application being approved and that metal shed roofs have been allowed
on the rear of the house.
The application was continued.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024
E. AHBR 24-135 1727 Mayflower Lane
Addition (Garage 896sqft)
Attachments: 1727 Mayflower Ln. AHBR Packet 4.24.24 Meeting
1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet 4.10.24 Meeting
Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet 3.13.24 Meeting
1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the project and
reviewing the staff comments and concerns.
Mr. Jeff Raggets, applicant, the Board and staff discussed: The revised drawings for the
addition which must be subordinate to the main structure, the applicants problems of lowering
the roof, that the size of the wing is larger than the main mass of the house, the possibility of
making an L shaped addition and absorbing the addition into the main mass of the house, and
the need for staff to review the revised drawing prior to the Board approval.
The AHBR application was continued.
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR 7126 200 Laurel Lake (Informal Review)
New Construction (Seven new villas)
Attachments: Laurel Lake Informal Review AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the project and
reviewed the staff's comments. Mr. Sugar explained the approval process and reviewed the
LDC regarding front facing garages.
Mr. John Ducatman, and Eilene Doss RDL Architects, described their process to date, and
responded to staff's comments by: Noting the front of the proposed buildings are similar to the
existing structures, that the attached garages fit the existing context of Laurel Lake, that
architectural detail was added by varying the height of the stone band, that the bay windows
match some of the existing bay windows and the hip roofs on the sunroom match some of the
existing sunrooms and are on the back of the house.
The Board comments include: The proposed units have a wider garage and gables than the
existing units, recognition of the challenges of building on this campus, that the gables
enhance the look of the structure, that the stone around the structure must be a consistent
height, concern with the dormer over the entrance door, the bay window needs a foundation,
the stone on the chimney should match the water table store, the possibility of upgrading the
garage doors, and that the garage doors do not respect the standard of rear or side entry
however they do keep the development consistent and this on a private drive which is more
than 150-feet from a public road.
This matter was discussed
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 28, 2024
B. AHBR 2-14-2024
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
February 14, 2024
Attachments: February 14, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the February 14,
2024, Minutes be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley
VIII. Staff Update
Ms. Kirkovich noted March will have only one Board meeting.
This matter was discussed
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this be adjourned
at 9 p.m. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Wetzel and Mr. Workley
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
John Funyak
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 2/27/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024
B. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (1,763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch)
Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect
a) Staff notes the project went to AHBR on February 14, 2024. Staff and the
Board commented on the flat roof & window design as well as the material
of the proposed garage door and if these features were compatible with the
overall historic nature of the home. The Board scheduled a site visit, which
was conducted on February 20, 2024.
b) The applicant has since submitted revised drawings that depicts a
minimized flat roof area, changes to the window design, and a wood
garage door material.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are
to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of
approximately every 12 feet. Enlarge windows on the east elevation to
better meet the intent of this requirement.
d) The Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public
faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a
system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Revise windows on
east elevation to better comply with this requirement.
e) The Secretary of Interior Standards state new additions shall not destroy
historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size,
scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the
property and its environment. Suggest the high windows have a more
compatible design with the existing high windows.
Attachments: 136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
136 Hudson Street Material Specifications
Legislative History
2/14/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 2/27/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024
A. AHBR 23-977 7778 Valley View Road
Accessory Structure (Pool house, 2,000sqft)
Submitted by Arthur Karas
a) Staff notes the project went to the Board of Zoning & Building Appeals on
February 15, 2024 and was granted a structure size variance as well as
allowing the structure to be partially in the side yard.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state the roof of an enclosed
accessory building should be the same roof shape as the roof of the main
structure. Staff notes the accessory structure will have a dutch gable roof
and the house has a mix of gable and hip roofs. Question the porch roof
and if it should be fully below the main mass roof.
c) Revise the floor plan to depict the proposed windows.
Attachments: 7778 Valley View Rd. AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 24-61 7659 Hudson Park Drive
Addition (256sqft, Covered Deck)
Submitted by Nicholas Hoover, Hoover’s Hardscapes
a) The Architectural Design Standards state all chimneys must match the
foundation material. Question if the proposed chimney will match the
existing exposed foundation.
b) Question the roof and how it will intersect with the bay window on the rear
elevation.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to
be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a
foundation to match. The addition is proposed to have a metal roof while
the existing house has a shingle material. Staff notes the roof will be over
an open deck area.
d) Submit right elevation to show how chimney ties into the proposed
roofline.
Attachments: 7659 Hudson Park Dr. AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 2/27/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024
D. AHBR 7585 N. Vinemont Ct.
23-1109 Addition (Covered Deck, 288sqft)
Submitted by Kevin McCausland, McCausland Landscapes
a) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to
be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a
foundation to match. The applicant is proposing consistent deck material
and trim to match the existing house. Question the panel siding and if a
foundation should be incorporated.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state roofs on projections should
match the roof material of the building, and to the extent possible, shall be
same kind of roof. The applicant is proposing a metal shed roof while the
house has a shingled gable roof; however, would be located at the rear of
the house.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state all chimneys must match the
foundation material. Fireplace vents, when incorporated, shall be located
at the rear elevation. Revise elevations to depict the proposed chimney and
how the materials relate to the existing chimney and foundation.
Attachments: 7585 N. Vinemont Ct. AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 2/27/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024
E. AHBR 24-135 1727 Mayflower Lane
Addition (Garage 896sqft)
Submitted by Timothy Raggets
a) The Architectural Design Standards state that wings may not be larger or
taller than the main body of the structure. Staff notes the main body of the
structure is approximately 1,051sf and the applicant is proposing to create
a wing that is 1,383sf. Staff suggests breaking up the addition into multiple
wings or masses to meet this requirement. Confirm the addition would not
be taller than the main body.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state replacement wall and roof
materials should be blended across a facade (rather than small patch
areas) to ensure compatibility with existing materials. The proposed
addition would cause a 52 foot continuous wall span. Question how siding
and roof materials will be blended. Suggest lowering the roof 18 inches to
strengthen the presence of the main mass and address material blending.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state the front face of the main body
must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of the wings. The existing
house is a two-story wing type with the wing extending forward of the main
body. Creating a second-floor increases non-compliance with this
requirement. Any second-floor massing should be significantly reduced in
scale by lowering the ridge height and removing the reverse gable. The
second-floor windows could be revised into a partial dormer.
d) The Architectural Design Standards states in new construction, an
attached garage may be located in a wing or in the main body, but must be
entered from the side yard or from the rear. The proposed addition would
further non-compliance from this requirement.
e) The Architectural Design Standards state details in a wing must be
consistently applied throughout the sides of that wing. Question the
different heights of the garage doors of the proposed addition and if
window trim would match the existing.
Attachments: 1727 Mayflower Lane AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 2/27/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 28, 2024
A. AHBR 7126 200 Laurel Lake (Informal Review)
New Construction (Seven new villas)
Submitted by John Ducatman, RDL Architects
a) Staff notes that Laurel Lake has requested an informal review by the Board
to discuss their seven villa new construction project. Staff has some
preliminary comments regarding the proposal.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state the front face of the main body
must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of the wings. Staff notes
the proposal depicts the garage wings forward of the main mass.
c) The Architectural Design Standards in state new construction, an attached
garage may be located in a wing or in the main body, but must be entered
from the side yard or from the rear. Staff notes the proposal depicts the
garages forward facing; however, this would mimic the existing design.
d) The Architectural Design Standards state the materials used in any mass
must be applied consistently on that mass on all sides of the structure. Staff
notes the proposal depicts the exposed foundation on the different sides of
the mass. Suggest a more consistent height design.
e) The Architectural Design Standards state projections on the ground floor
should be carried through to the foundation. Revise elevations to show this
requirement on the projections and bay window bump outs.
f) The Architectural Design Standards State All roofs in all the wings must be
of the same shape as the main body, but they may have a different pitch or
orientation. Question the sunroom hip roof design when the rest of the roof
shapes are gables.
Attachments: Laurel Lake Informal Review AHBR Packet
B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
2-14-2024 February 14, 2024
Attachments: February 14, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 2/27/2024
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.