Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · February 14, 2024
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
John Funyak
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 14, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
Absent: 1 - Mr. Wetzel
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the Consent
Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
D. AHBR 24-50 5 Atterbury (Everbowl)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Attachments: 5 Atterbury AHBR Packet
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024
C. AHBR 23-113595 Bard Drive (Hudson Yard Townhouses)
Signs (Ground Signs)
Attachments: 95 Bard Drive AHBR Packet
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
A. AHBR 23-113250 Division Street (Historic District)
Alterations (Door)
Attachments: 50 Division Street Staff Report 3.13.24 Meeting
50 Division St. AHBR Packet
50 Division ST. AHBR Packet 2.28.24 Meeting
50 Division St. AHBR Packet - 2.14.2024 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project, noting it was before the
Board on January 10, 2024, and was updated subsequent to the staff review.
Mr. James Field, Co-President, Temple Beth Shalom, described the proposed door and
custom made doors with costs estimates of between $10 and $14 thousand dollars, for which
the FEMA grant is insufficient. Mr. Field also noted that Anderson does not make a wood
door that is entry resistant.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed: 1) A wood door in front of the proposed door and
the associated difficulties of the installation as well as other wooden storm doors in the area .
2) Other grants that have been explored. 3) That the FEMA grant is for terrorism purposes
only. 4) That the unique situation for this door may permit some exception to the Design
Standards. 5) That because this is in the Historic District, exceptions should not be made to
the LDC and this door has been denied to another church and various residences . 6) The
unique threats toward Temple Beth Shalom. 7) The distinction between the historic portion of
the building and the more recent addition. 8) The description of the proposed door. 9)
Information related to window upgrades. 10) The desire for a comprehensive security plan.
11) The Board's concern with setting a precedent by allowing a metal door in the historic
district. 12) The rise of antisemitism. 13) Many Board members speaking favorably of a
wooden storm door in front of the proposed door.
The applicant's requested the Board to table the application for a month to explore the
possibility of adding a wooden storm door.
This matter was continued
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024
A. AHBR 24-58 51 S. Main Street (Nona’s)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Attachments: 51 S. Main St AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
Ms. Jessie Obert, business owner, stated the sign will be centered on the building and
requested the use of a composite material with a matte finish.
The Board, applicant and staff noted the owner's sign plan requires MDO material, however,
the applicant may request the owner update the sign plan.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Funyak, that this AHBR
Application be approved with the following conditions: 1) The backing material be
MDO. 2) A contingency to coordinate with the property owner to update the sign plan
to allow a composite material which is to be confirmed by staff. 3) A matte finish be
used. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
B. AHBR 24-57 85 S. Main Street (Berkshire Hathway)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Attachments: 85 S. Main AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
The applicant agreed to a matte finish and to provide a monument sign.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Funyak, that this AHBR
Application be approved with a matte finish and the applicant supplying a monument
sign. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
E. AHBR 24-97 358 Atterbury Blvd
Addition (704sqft Great Room)
Attachments: 358 Atterbury Blvd AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, stated the intent is to match the existing house with wood
siding, asphalt shingles, and matching stained wood.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application
be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024
F. AHBR 24-76 259 S. Main Street
Addition (392sqft Master Suit)
Attachments: 259 S. Main St AHBR Packet
The applicant was not present.
This matter was continued
G. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (1,763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch)
Attachments: Perspectus Report - 136 Hudson Street - 3.8.2024
136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
136 Hudson Street Material Specifications
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing and displaying the project and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Fred Margulies, designer, described the owners purposes for the redesign, referenced
historical photos which reflect the desired front door area, noted parts of the ceiling are lower
than a normal ceiling, and displayed the many different roof lines of the existing house and
the proposed small flat roof. The applicant described the redesigned window plan which
allows better viewing from inside the house.
The Board, applicant and staff discussed: 1) The proposed roofing which has a flat roof that is
not visible from the street, and if the flat roof conforms to the design requirement that changes
be subtle and retain the essential character of the main mass. 2) That the proposed garage
door change is more functional than the two existing doors, but must have a wood appearance
and may be made to mimic the look of two doors. 3) That the proposed addition windows are
a significant departure from the existing and do not leave any room on the corner of the
house. 4) The lack of fenestration on the rear wall. 5) The possibility of adjusting the
windows to match each other.
The Board decided to conduct a site visit.
This matter was continued.
I. AHBR 24-94 146 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (161sqft Sunroom)
Attachments: 146 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the existing house,
describing the project and reviewing the staff comments.
The Board, applicant and staff, discussed the door style which will essentially match the
existing windows and the casement around the door,
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR 7077 Council Annual Check-in - CONTINUED
Attachments: Memo to AHBR
Staff noted Ms. Kenney submitted suggested revisions to the document including why a
particular historic consultant was chosen. The Board also discussed future objectives for the
AHBR.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this document be
approved and that Mr. Caputo present it to Council. The motion carried by the
following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
B. AHBR 1-24-2024
Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
January 24, 2024.
Attachments: January 24, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the January 24,
2024, Minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
VIII. Staff Update
There were no staff updates.
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the meeting be
adjourned at 9:12 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
John Funyak
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Karl Wetzel
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 14, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
D. AHBR 24-50 5 Atterbury (Everbowl)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Submitted by Jeff Clark, Easy Sign Group
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 5 Atterbury AHBR Packet
C. AHBR 95 Bard Drive (Hudson Yard Townhouses)
23-1135 Signs (Ground Signs)
Submitted by Michelle Miller
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 95 Bard Drive AHBR Packet
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 2/12/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024
A. AHBR 50 Division Street (Historic District)
23-1132 Alterations (Door)
Submitted by James Field
a) This case went to the AHBR on January 10, 2023. The Board continued the
project so that the applicant could have more time to explore cost
estimates for a door material that would be more appropriate for the
Historic District.
b) The applicant has submitted additional documentation in response to the
AHBR request.
Attachments: 50 Division St. AHBR Packet - 2.14.2024 Meeting
50 Division St. AHBR Packet
Legislative History
1/10/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 24-58 51 S. Main Street (Nona’s)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Submitted by Jessie Obert, Business Owner
a) Staff notes the proposal is to install a 30” x 84” building sign for Nona’s
establishment.
b) The sign plan for evaporator works requires signs to be constructed of a
medium density overlay (MDO) material. Staff notes the sign is proposed
to be an aluminum composite material. Revise sign to depict the required
MDO material.
c) Architectural Design Standards state the sign and associated lighting
fixtures should complement the architecture of the building on which it is
placed and should be placed in an appropriate location on the building
facade. Question sign placement on building and if it should be centered
between the vent and the lower roof.
d) The Architectural Design Standards state signs should have a matte finish.
Confirm the sign will comply with this requirement.
Attachments: 51 S. Main St AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 24-57 85 S. Main Street (Berkshire Hathway)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Submitted by Jessie Obert
a) The sign plan for this establishment is a hunter green sign with off white
lettering and a boarder. The proposed design will meet this design as well
as include non-dimensional lettering similar to surrounding signs.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state signs should have a matte finish.
Confirm the sign complies with this design standard.
Attachments: 85 S. Main AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 2/12/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024
E. AHBR 24-97 358 Atterbury Blvd
Addition (704sqft Great Room)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to
be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a
foundation to match. Staff notes the applicant has confirm the addition will
have asphalt shingles, horizontal siding to be painted to match the
existing, and vinyl windows. Confirm how these elements will be
compatible with the main structure as well as if the foundation will match
the existing.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state materials used on an open porch
or screen room need not be the same as other materials in the structures,
but should be related to materials used in the details of the structure.
Confirm how details relate to the existing structure.
Attachments: 358 Atterbury Blvd AHBR Packet
F. AHBR 24-76 259 S. Main Street
Addition (392sqft Master Suit)
Submitted by Terry Crites
a) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are
to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of
approximately every 12 feet. Revise the east elevation to depict
fenestration.
b) The Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public
faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a
system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Question if the south
view elevation windows could be revised to be more symmetrical.
c) The Architectural Design Standards state exposed foundations and tie
courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Confirm
proposed exposed foundation will match the existing.
Attachments: 259 S. Main St AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 2/12/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024
G. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (1763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch)
Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect
a) Staff notes the scope of work includes adding in a front porch roof,
changing existing two garage doors to one double garage door, window
removal and replacement on the existing elevation and an addition that
will include a flat roof.
b) Staff notes conflicts in roof design, window design, and garage materials
when reviewing the following Secretary of Interior Preservation Briefs for
additions to historic buildings:
- The new work shall be compatible with the architectural
features to protect the integrity of the property and its
environment.
- A new addition must retain the essential form and integrity of
the historic property.
- The new works should differentiate from the historic mass, bit
differences should be subtle.
- A new addition should protect those visual qualities that make
the building eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places.
- New work should be harmonious with the old in scale,
proportions, materials, and color.
- Materials need not be the same as the historic building, but
they should be harmonious; they should not be so different that
they stand out or distract from the historic building.
c) Staff notes the current design proposal would not meet the design
standards and the Secretary of Interior Standards. Suggest a re-design that
would be more compatible with these standards.
Attachments: 136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 2/12/2024
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024
I. AHBR 24-94 146 Hudson Street (Historic District)
Addition (161sqft Sunroom)
Submitted by Nathanael Dunn, Architect
a) Applicant is proposing to convert a three seasons room to a conditioned
sunroom.
b) Staff notes the home was built in 1991. The Architectural Design
Standards state because the house is not greater than 50 years old, the
house would not be contributing to the Historic District and would be
reviewed according to the type standards rather than the Secretary of
Interior Standards.
c) Architectural Design Standards state new freestanding structures and
non-historic properties: The use of substitute materials is acceptable
provided they are compatible in proportion, size, style, composition,
design, color, and texture of historic materials. Staff notes the applicant is
proposing aluminum clad wood (Pella Lifestyle Series) windows that will
match the style of the existing windows and the Pella Reserve series for the
proposed door.
Attachments: 146 Hudson St. AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR 7077 Council Annual Check-in - CONTINUED
Attachments: Memo to AHBR
B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
1-24-2024 January 24, 2024.
Attachments: January 24, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 2/12/2024
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.