Muyni
← Back to Hudson

Architectural & Historic Board of Review

Regular Meeting

Hudson, OH · February 14, 2024

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Hudson, Ohio Meeting Minutes - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, February 14, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22. II. Roll Call Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley Absent: 1 - Mr. Wetzel III. Public Comment Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the Board. There were no comments. IV. Consent Applications A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley D. AHBR 24-50 5 Atterbury (Everbowl) Sign (Wall Sign) Attachments: 5 Atterbury AHBR Packet This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024 C. AHBR 23-113595 Bard Drive (Hudson Yard Townhouses) Signs (Ground Signs) Attachments: 95 Bard Drive AHBR Packet This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda. V. Old Business A. AHBR 23-113250 Division Street (Historic District) Alterations (Door) Attachments: 50 Division Street Staff Report 3.13.24 Meeting 50 Division St. AHBR Packet 50 Division ST. AHBR Packet 2.28.24 Meeting 50 Division St. AHBR Packet - 2.14.2024 Meeting Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project, noting it was before the Board on January 10, 2024, and was updated subsequent to the staff review. Mr. James Field, Co-President, Temple Beth Shalom, described the proposed door and custom made doors with costs estimates of between $10 and $14 thousand dollars, for which the FEMA grant is insufficient. Mr. Field also noted that Anderson does not make a wood door that is entry resistant. The Board, applicant and staff discussed: 1) A wood door in front of the proposed door and the associated difficulties of the installation as well as other wooden storm doors in the area . 2) Other grants that have been explored. 3) That the FEMA grant is for terrorism purposes only. 4) That the unique situation for this door may permit some exception to the Design Standards. 5) That because this is in the Historic District, exceptions should not be made to the LDC and this door has been denied to another church and various residences . 6) The unique threats toward Temple Beth Shalom. 7) The distinction between the historic portion of the building and the more recent addition. 8) The description of the proposed door. 9) Information related to window upgrades. 10) The desire for a comprehensive security plan. 11) The Board's concern with setting a precedent by allowing a metal door in the historic district. 12) The rise of antisemitism. 13) Many Board members speaking favorably of a wooden storm door in front of the proposed door. The applicant's requested the Board to table the application for a month to explore the possibility of adding a wooden storm door. This matter was continued VI. New Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024 A. AHBR 24-58 51 S. Main Street (Nona’s) Sign (Wall Sign) Attachments: 51 S. Main St AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff comments. Ms. Jessie Obert, business owner, stated the sign will be centered on the building and requested the use of a composite material with a matte finish. The Board, applicant and staff noted the owner's sign plan requires MDO material, however, the applicant may request the owner update the sign plan. A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Funyak, that this AHBR Application be approved with the following conditions: 1) The backing material be MDO. 2) A contingency to coordinate with the property owner to update the sign plan to allow a composite material which is to be confirmed by staff. 3) A matte finish be used. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley B. AHBR 24-57 85 S. Main Street (Berkshire Hathway) Sign (Wall Sign) Attachments: 85 S. Main AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff comments. The applicant agreed to a matte finish and to provide a monument sign. A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Funyak, that this AHBR Application be approved with a matte finish and the applicant supplying a monument sign. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley E. AHBR 24-97 358 Atterbury Blvd Addition (704sqft Great Room) Attachments: 358 Atterbury Blvd AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff comments. Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, stated the intent is to match the existing house with wood siding, asphalt shingles, and matching stained wood. A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024 F. AHBR 24-76 259 S. Main Street Addition (392sqft Master Suit) Attachments: 259 S. Main St AHBR Packet The applicant was not present. This matter was continued G. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District) Addition (1,763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch) Attachments: Perspectus Report - 136 Hudson Street - 3.8.2024 136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet 136 Hudson Street Material Specifications Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing and displaying the project and reviewing the staff comments. Mr. Fred Margulies, designer, described the owners purposes for the redesign, referenced historical photos which reflect the desired front door area, noted parts of the ceiling are lower than a normal ceiling, and displayed the many different roof lines of the existing house and the proposed small flat roof. The applicant described the redesigned window plan which allows better viewing from inside the house. The Board, applicant and staff discussed: 1) The proposed roofing which has a flat roof that is not visible from the street, and if the flat roof conforms to the design requirement that changes be subtle and retain the essential character of the main mass. 2) That the proposed garage door change is more functional than the two existing doors, but must have a wood appearance and may be made to mimic the look of two doors. 3) That the proposed addition windows are a significant departure from the existing and do not leave any room on the corner of the house. 4) The lack of fenestration on the rear wall. 5) The possibility of adjusting the windows to match each other. The Board decided to conduct a site visit. This matter was continued. I. AHBR 24-94 146 Hudson Street (Historic District) Addition (161sqft Sunroom) Attachments: 146 Hudson St. AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the existing house, describing the project and reviewing the staff comments. The Board, applicant and staff, discussed the door style which will essentially match the existing windows and the casement around the door, A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024 VII. Other Business A. AHBR 7077 Council Annual Check-in - CONTINUED Attachments: Memo to AHBR Staff noted Ms. Kenney submitted suggested revisions to the document including why a particular historic consultant was chosen. The Board also discussed future objectives for the AHBR. A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this document be approved and that Mr. Caputo present it to Council. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley B. AHBR 1-24-2024 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: January 24, 2024. Attachments: January 24, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the January 24, 2024, Minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley VIII. Staff Update There were no staff updates. IX. Adjournment A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the meeting be adjourned at 9:12 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 14, 2024 ___________________________________________ John Caputo, Chair ___________________________________________ John Workley, Secretary ___________________________________________ Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission * * * City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6

Agenda

City of Hudson, Ohio CD Meeting Agenda - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, February 14, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Public Comment IV. Consent Applications D. AHBR 24-50 5 Atterbury (Everbowl) Sign (Wall Sign) Submitted by Jeff Clark, Easy Sign Group a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 5 Atterbury AHBR Packet C. AHBR 95 Bard Drive (Hudson Yard Townhouses) 23-1135 Signs (Ground Signs) Submitted by Michelle Miller a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 95 Bard Drive AHBR Packet V. Old Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 2/12/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024 A. AHBR 50 Division Street (Historic District) 23-1132 Alterations (Door) Submitted by James Field a) This case went to the AHBR on January 10, 2023. The Board continued the project so that the applicant could have more time to explore cost estimates for a door material that would be more appropriate for the Historic District. b) The applicant has submitted additional documentation in response to the AHBR request. Attachments: 50 Division St. AHBR Packet - 2.14.2024 Meeting 50 Division St. AHBR Packet Legislative History 1/10/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued of Review VI. New Business A. AHBR 24-58 51 S. Main Street (Nona’s) Sign (Wall Sign) Submitted by Jessie Obert, Business Owner a) Staff notes the proposal is to install a 30” x 84” building sign for Nona’s establishment. b) The sign plan for evaporator works requires signs to be constructed of a medium density overlay (MDO) material. Staff notes the sign is proposed to be an aluminum composite material. Revise sign to depict the required MDO material. c) Architectural Design Standards state the sign and associated lighting fixtures should complement the architecture of the building on which it is placed and should be placed in an appropriate location on the building facade. Question sign placement on building and if it should be centered between the vent and the lower roof. d) The Architectural Design Standards state signs should have a matte finish. Confirm the sign will comply with this requirement. Attachments: 51 S. Main St AHBR Packet B. AHBR 24-57 85 S. Main Street (Berkshire Hathway) Sign (Wall Sign) Submitted by Jessie Obert a) The sign plan for this establishment is a hunter green sign with off white lettering and a boarder. The proposed design will meet this design as well as include non-dimensional lettering similar to surrounding signs. b) The Architectural Design Standards state signs should have a matte finish. Confirm the sign complies with this design standard. Attachments: 85 S. Main AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 2/12/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024 E. AHBR 24-97 358 Atterbury Blvd Addition (704sqft Great Room) Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects a) The Architectural Design Standards state additions should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a foundation to match. Staff notes the applicant has confirm the addition will have asphalt shingles, horizontal siding to be painted to match the existing, and vinyl windows. Confirm how these elements will be compatible with the main structure as well as if the foundation will match the existing. b) The Architectural Design Standards state materials used on an open porch or screen room need not be the same as other materials in the structures, but should be related to materials used in the details of the structure. Confirm how details relate to the existing structure. Attachments: 358 Atterbury Blvd AHBR Packet F. AHBR 24-76 259 S. Main Street Addition (392sqft Master Suit) Submitted by Terry Crites a) The Architectural Design Standards state large expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Revise the east elevation to depict fenestration. b) The Architectural Design Standards state doors and windows on the public faces of a building should be arranged so that they are regulated by a system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular lines. Question if the south view elevation windows could be revised to be more symmetrical. c) The Architectural Design Standards state exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Confirm proposed exposed foundation will match the existing. Attachments: 259 S. Main St AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 2/12/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024 G. AHBR 24-65 136 Hudson Street (Historic District) Addition (1763sqft bedroom, laundry, family room & screen porch) Submitted by Fred Margulies, Architect a) Staff notes the scope of work includes adding in a front porch roof, changing existing two garage doors to one double garage door, window removal and replacement on the existing elevation and an addition that will include a flat roof. b) Staff notes conflicts in roof design, window design, and garage materials when reviewing the following Secretary of Interior Preservation Briefs for additions to historic buildings: - The new work shall be compatible with the architectural features to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. - A new addition must retain the essential form and integrity of the historic property. - The new works should differentiate from the historic mass, bit differences should be subtle. - A new addition should protect those visual qualities that make the building eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. - New work should be harmonious with the old in scale, proportions, materials, and color. - Materials need not be the same as the historic building, but they should be harmonious; they should not be so different that they stand out or distract from the historic building. c) Staff notes the current design proposal would not meet the design standards and the Secretary of Interior Standards. Suggest a re-design that would be more compatible with these standards. Attachments: 136 Hudson St. AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 2/12/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 14, 2024 I. AHBR 24-94 146 Hudson Street (Historic District) Addition (161sqft Sunroom) Submitted by Nathanael Dunn, Architect a) Applicant is proposing to convert a three seasons room to a conditioned sunroom. b) Staff notes the home was built in 1991. The Architectural Design Standards state because the house is not greater than 50 years old, the house would not be contributing to the Historic District and would be reviewed according to the type standards rather than the Secretary of Interior Standards. c) Architectural Design Standards state new freestanding structures and non-historic properties: The use of substitute materials is acceptable provided they are compatible in proportion, size, style, composition, design, color, and texture of historic materials. Staff notes the applicant is proposing aluminum clad wood (Pella Lifestyle Series) windows that will match the style of the existing windows and the Pella Reserve series for the proposed door. Attachments: 146 Hudson St. AHBR Packet VII. Other Business A. AHBR 7077 Council Annual Check-in - CONTINUED Attachments: Memo to AHBR B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: 1-24-2024 January 24, 2024. Attachments: January 24, 2024 AHBR Minutes - Draft VIII. Staff Update IX. Adjournment * * * The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner, an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 2/12/2024

Get email alerts for Hudson

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting