Muyni
← Back to Hudson

Architectural & Historic Board of Review

Regular Meeting

Hudson, OH · May 8, 2024

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Hudson, Ohio Meeting Minutes - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, May 8, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22. II. Roll Call Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley Absent: 1 - Mr. Wetzel III. Public Comment Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the Board. There were no comments. IV. Consent Applications A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley A. AHBR 24-408 47 Aurora Street (Historic District) Alteration (Roof Replacement) Attachments: 47 Aurora St. AHBR Packet This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda. V. Old Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final May 8, 2024 A. AHBR 24-205 121 Elm Street (Historic District) Addition (Kitchen and Primary Suite) Attachments: 121 Elm Street AHBR Packet 5.8.24 Meeting 121 Elm Street Perspectus Report 121 Elm St. AHBR Packet 3.13.24 Meeting Ms. Krickovich noted the application was discussed at the March 13 , 2024 AHBR meeting, described the applicant's revisions and the staff comments. The Board, staff, Mr. Gordon Costlow, architect, and Mr. Max Rader, homeowner, discussed: Replacing two windows which are in disrepair with matching - historically accurate windows and the type and size of windows, that the type of trim around the windows on the addition will be historically accurate, that a change of roof material will require new drawings and a new AHBR meetings, that the existing material on the garage is Hardie-board, that the new foundation will match the existing foundation, that the proposed gable is one-foot lower than the existing, and that attempts will be made to reuse any historic materials that are removed . A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be approved with the following conditions: The notations on the addition side are to be Hardi-board, staff is to review and approve the two proposed windows in the kitchen which are to be Pella Reserve or Marvin Ultimate, and existing siding which is removed will be used on the existing house in some way. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley Nay: 1 - Ms. Marzulla City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final May 8, 2024 B. AHBR 24- 195 172 Aurora Street (Historic District) Alteration, Addition & Accessory Structures Attachments: 172 Aurora Street AHBR Packet 5.8.24 Meeting 172 Aurora Perspectus Report 172 Aurora Street AHBR Packet 4.10.24 Meeting Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting this it was discussed at the April 24 , 2024, AHBR meeting, that the applicant has subsequently made design changes which include removing the existing siding, and reviewed the staff comments. The Board, staff and Mr. Justin Kapela, J. Kapela Design Company, and Mr. David Moorhead, homeowner, discussed: The difficulty of removing and reusing the siding because of potential damage done in the removal, the means and method report which shows how the siding will be removed, information regarding the consultant who will work with the applicant in the restoration of the siding, that the site visit showed that much of the siding must be removed, the photo from 1950 showing the window above the door being offset, that some Board members feel the window above the door as is - does not look correct, that a very limited part of the house has sheathing under the siding, and the qualifications of the applicant's consultant. The Board encouraged the applicants to give great care to the preservation of the wood siding. A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Mr. Funyak, that this AHBR Application be approved with the following conditions: The means and method for siding removal and restoration which was provided to the Board be followed and the approval include the fence around the pool. Mr. Workley also expressed appreciation for the applicant's historical consultants work. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley VI. New Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final May 8, 2024 A. AHBR 24-364 311 Kilbourne Drive New Residential Construction (Two-Story Single-Family House) Attachments: 311 Kilbourne Dr. AHBR Packet Staff Exhibit Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and reviewing the elevations and project, and reviewing the staff comments. Mr. Joseph Matava, Peninsula Architects, and Mr. Cullen Taussig, homeowner discussed: That the gable running front to back is the main form of the structure and the left and right elevations are the wings, if that premise is accepted then the staff comment regarding the five foot offset will not apply, that the stone on the front has a historic precedence in homes of this style, that the home is 135-feet from the property line, that elements from the neighboring houses are used in the design, and the scale and form are not out of line with the neighbors . The Board, staff and applicant discussed: What should be considered the main mass of the house, that the stone siding terminates on inside corners, that the wing roof seems larger than the front facing gable, the differences in roof height and alternate roof form renderings which help the Board understand the elevations better, that all material changes will take place at inside corners, where the stone is used, the rear windows size and style while noting no property will have a view of the rear of the house, that the house does incorporate items from neighboring house design, that screening exists and there is a 135-foot distance from the neighbors. A motion was made by Mr. Funyak, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be approved with a smaller window in the rear gable as approved by staff . The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley B. AHBR 24-378 6230 Wessington Drive Accessory Structure (Screened in Pavilion) Attachments: 6230 Wessington AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the elevations and reviewing the staff comments. Mr. Derek Kurlya, KGK & Company, described the elements of the pavillion which match the existing house, the screens which are a simple black mesh, the site plan, the stone used for the chimney, and that brick are not planned for use on the pavilion. A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be approved as amended so that KGK Landscaping work with staff with regard to using brick on the base of the columns. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final May 8, 2024 C. AHBR 24-391 2490 Deer Hollow Addition (Second Story, Gym & Home Office) Attachments: 2490 Deer Hollow AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the house and reviewing the staff comments. Ms. Carrie Cronkey, homeowner, stated the addition will be less than 15 percent of the total mass of the house and 33 percent of the existing addition, that landscaping will mitigate the effect of the addition, that garages forward of the main mass are typical of the neighborhood and exists today, and that new brick and mortar will be used on the entire addition . Ms. Cronkey also distributed the roof plan to the Board. The Board, applicant and staff discussed: The large size of the proposed addition, that the height of the addition will match the height of the house, alternative designs, and the view of the proposed addition from unaltered photos. The Board and applicant discussed adding dormers to the roof. A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be approved as amended with a dormer over the three bay window which may be administratively approved.. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley D. AHBR 24-368 2655 Harland Drive Fence (4ft Split Rail) Attachments: 2655 Harland AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project and reviewing the staff comments. Ms. Helen and Mr. David Uehlein, homeowners were present for the meeting. The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: If wire fence is allowed in Hudson, that previous uses of wire have been allowed but further from the road, that various styles of fence are used in this neighborhood, the request that the need for pet containment and child safety from the pond be considerations, alternative colors for the wood, the use of landscaping, that wire mesh was not allowed for a house on Edgar Drive, and that fences in front of the house and near the street are to be lower in height and more formally designed. This matter was continued City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final May 8, 2024 E. AHBR 24-426 13 N. Oviatt Street (Historic District) Demolition (One Story, Single-Family House) Attachments: Perspectus Consultant Report 13 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by reviewing the project which is the demolition of a house in the Historic District. Mr. Clayton and Ms. Megan Braham, homeowners, supplied information about the house to be demolished which shows: The thought was the house was built in 1953, however records Mr. Braham provided shows there was no habitable house on the parcel in 1972, then in 1978 there was a habitable house on the property. Sometime between 1972 and 1978 either a house was made on the property or the uninhabitable house was updated . Today, the Braham's own the house but at 790 square feet, it is not suitable for a family and the Braham's believe it was a shed that was turned into a house. Mr. Braham showed the type of house that might be built if the demolition request is granted . He also made a commitment that what is built will be in keeping with the Historic District and designed by the Sveda family. The Board, applicant and staff discussed: If the specific build date of the house is known, the history of the Historic designation for the house, the possibility of combining the demolition of the house with the approval for the next house in one application, if there is significance between when a structure is built and when it becomes a habitable house, and that research regarding the house is more important than a site visit to the Board. A motion was made by Mr. Funyak, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this AHBR Application be continued and that the historic consultant be requested to examine the house and records. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Funyak, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Mr. Workley VII. Other Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final May 8, 2024 A. AHBR 7073 S. Darrow Road Townhomes (Informal) New Residential Construction (29 Unit Townhomes - District 3) Attachments: Preserve of Hudson AHRB Packet 2.23.22 AHBR Packet & Minutes Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by reviewing the history of the project and noting it will go before the Planning Commission on May 13, 2024. Ms. Hanna Cohan Plessner, Knez Homes, described: The completely new site plan and building orientation, the revised plan submitted on the day of the AHBR meeting, the color(s) of the buildings, the history of the property and project, that the site layout is driven by an area of protected wetlands, and that a new builder is involved in the project . Ms. Plessner noted that the roofs had an error in the drawings showing one continuous roof which has been corrected, that a variety of materials, architectural styles, and bay windows are not included in the drawings, that different color front doors are included and there is a willingness for different styles of doors, that the foundation can be discussed however, the builder would not like to have a masonry water table, that many details can be changed with the formal submittal, that all the elevations and details will be submitted with the formal submittal, and that all material changes will take place at inside corners. Ms. Plessner and the Board discussed the garage bump outs which the builder would like to remain as is, and that the sides without a porch need additional fenestration or details. The Board, applicant and staff discussed: Design options for the end units, the impression of the long length of the facade on the end building without a wrap around porch, the possibility of varying the design of the front of the buildings by moving the doors and or windows from one side to the other, that the variation of the front roofs is good, the color pallets, when the color of a building is a common theme it makes it look more cohesive, the possibility of rearranging some of the units from one building to another buildings, and that each house will be responsible for its own trash. This matter was discussed VIII. Staff Update There was no staff update. IX. Adjournment A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the meeting be adjourned at 10:19 p.m.. The motion carried by an unanimous vote. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final May 8, 2024 ___________________________________________ John Caputo, Chair ___________________________________________ John Workley, Secretary ___________________________________________ Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission . * * * City of Hudson, Ohio Page 8

Agenda

City of Hudson, Ohio CD Meeting Agenda - Final-revised Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary John Funyak Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Karl Wetzel Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, May 8, 2024 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Public Comment IV. Consent Applications A. AHBR 24-408 47 Aurora Street (Historic District) Alteration (Roof Replacement) Submitted by Kaitlyn Davis, Campopiano Roofing a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 47 Aurora St. AHBR Packet V. Old Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 5/6/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - May 8, 2024 Final-revised A. AHBR 24-205 121 Elm Street (Historic District) Addition (Kitchen and Primary Suite) Submitted by Gordon Costlow a) This case was most recently discussed by the AHBR on March 13, 2024. The Board requested the assistance of the Consultant to review the proposed plans. b) The Consultant provided a report (in the attachments). The applicant submitted changes to the proposed design based on the report comments. Those changes include: - On the right elevation, the existing gable walls and siding to remain. Windows would be replaced to match existing profile with a different design to distinguish from the existing house. - Lowering the roof ridge line of the second story gable roof to allow this portion of the addition to be distinguished from the existing house. - Re-design the back porch from a hip roof to a gable roof. - All proposed windows to have a different detail design to better distinguish from the historic windows on the existing home. c) The applicant is proposing to remove historic materials on the existing garage and back portion of the house. d) The applicant is proposing to use a hardi-board material, Andersen vinyl clad wood/fibrex windows, and a shingle material to match the house. Specification sheets are provided in the packet. Revise proposed window to an aluminum clad full wood window to be more appropriate. Attachments: 121 Elm Street AHBR Packet 5.8.24 Meeting 121 Elm Street Perspectus Report 121 Elm St. AHBR Packet 3.13.24 Meeting City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 5/6/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - May 8, 2024 Final-revised B. AHBR 24- 172 Aurora Street (Historic District) 195 Alteration, Addition & Accessory Structures Submitted by Eric Kuczek a) Staff notes this case went to AHBR on April 24, 2024 and the Board reviewed the consultant report comments with the applicant and requested changes. b) The applicant made changes to reflect the discussion. Those changes are: - Keeping the existing window design on the front elevation on the 1913 addition. - Slight window adjustment to be aligned with existing fenestration. - A more simplified three window design on the left elevation. - The proposed pool house and detached garage have a consistent design and details. c) The applicant is proposing to remove the existing siding in order to install exterior sheathing. The existing siding would be reinstalled with replacement of deteriorated sections. Staff notes the following: - The proposed work was not in the original scope of the Consultant report. Question if the Board should seek a comment from the Consultant on this scope of work or if the applicant should have their own historic preservation consultant oversee best practices and prepare update reports. - Question the extent of siding anticipated to be replaced. Staff anticipates removing and replacing siding would be difficult without damaging. -Staff notes, based on observations during the April 16th site visit, portions of the building have substrate/sheathing. Suggest siding only be removed and replaced along walls without substrate/sheathing. - Suggest siding work be completed one façade at a time and a construction schedule to be submitted to help with staff oversight. d) Revised elevations state deteriorated trim would be replaced with a Boral material. Question if that would then mix wood and boral? e) Staff notes windows were discussed at the April 24, 2024 meeting, it was stated the Pella Architectural Reserve window would be used; however, no exterior cladding was specified. Attachments: 172 Aurora Street AHBR Packet 5.8.24 Meeting 172 Aurora Perspectus Report 172 Aurora Street AHBR Packet 4.10.24 Meeting VI. New Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 5/6/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - May 8, 2024 Final-revised A. AHBR 24-364 311 Kilbourne Drive New Residential Construction (Two-Story Single-Family House) Submitted by Elizabeth Nicklas, Peninsula Architects a) Staff notes this property, along with the adjacent property, received approval from the Board of Zoning & Building Appeals on November 16, 2023 for a lot frontage and a driveway setback approval. Additionally, the properties received approval from the Planning Commission on December 11, 2023 for a Conditional Use request for a shared driveway. b) Staff notes the proposal would be considered a two-story wing type. The Architectural Design Standards state the main body must be the largest visible mass and wings should be subordinate. Revise elevations to extend the gable to the right of the door in order to better meet this requirement and to balance the mass which has two different roof shapes. Staff has provided a sketch to demonstrate this comment. c) Wings are not permitted to project forward of the main mass. Reduce the forward projecting mass to a maximum of 5 feet. d) The Architectural Design Standards state exposed foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all elevations. Revise elevations to show the exposed foundation at a consistent level on all sides of the house. e) The Architectural Design Standards state the public faces of the building may also have up to three special windows, to call attention to a special feature in the composition (e.g., a picture window located in the center of the main body) or to use repetitively. No more than one type of special window may be used in any mass, except the main body, which may have two types of special windows. Revise the rear elevation to have a more consistent window design as there are three types of windows being proposed. f) The Architectural Design Standards states the design of any building shall be judged in reference to its site and the character of its surroundings, not as an independent object. The site plan for all new buildings shall be prepared with a clear understanding of the framework that exists or is being created in a particular area. Staff observes the overall house scale and number of roof shapes, dormers, wall material, and window shapes would be in contrast to the neighborhood framework. Attachments: 311 Kilbourne Dr. AHBR Packet Staff Exhibit City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 5/6/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - May 8, 2024 Final-revised B. AHBR 24-378 6230 Wessington Drive Accessory Structure (Screened in Pavillion) Submitted by Derek Kuryla, KGK & Company a) Staff notes this is a 462 square foot screened in pavilion located in the rear yard. b) The Architectural Design Standards state enclosed accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to the main body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or materials. Staff notes the structure is proposed to have a shingled roof material that will match the house and cedar beams that will be painted white to match the color of the house. Question if the manufactured stone could be a brick material to match the house and better meet this requlation. Attachments: 6230 Wessington AHBR Packet C. AHBR 24-391 2490 Deer Hollow Addition (Second Story, Gym & Home Office) Submitted by Carrie Cronkey a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing a second story addition to the attached garage. b) The Architectural Design Standards state the main body must be the largest visible mass. Question if the second story wing addition would cause the wing to be more visible and prominent than the main mass. c) The Architectural Design Standards state the front face of the main body must sit forward at least 18” from the front face of the wings. Staff notes the attached garage is non-conforming as it already sits forward of the main body. A second story addition would further emphasize the nonconforming element. d) Question how the proposed brick and mortar will blend with the existing on the same plane. e) Submit a roof plan to verify massing. Attachments: 2490 Deer Hollow AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 5/6/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - May 8, 2024 Final-revised D. AHBR 24-368 2655 Harland Drive Fence (4ft Split Rail) Submitted by Ryan Fedor, R&T Fence a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing a 4 foot high split rail fence with welded wire in between the rails that will be located one foot from the front property line. b) The Architectural Design Standards state fence heights and materials shall be compatible with their site location and surrounding development. Fences in the front yard shall be more formal in design and lower in height when sited close to the street or sidewalk. Staff notes the neighboring property does have a 4-foot high three rail fence, that has a more formal design. Revise plans to show a more formal design without wire mesh to meet this requirement. Attachments: 2655 Harland AHBR Packet E. AHBR 24-426 13 N. Oviatt Street (Historic District) Demolition (One Story, Single-Family House) Submitted by Clayton Braham a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to demolish a 1953 home located within the Historic District in order to build a new single-family dwelling on the property. The applicant states the detached garage will remain. b) Staff suggests the Board utilize this meeting for questions for the applicant, set a time for a site visit, and discuss any assistance from the Consultant. Attachments: 13 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet VII. Other Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 5/6/2024 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - May 8, 2024 Final-revised A. AHBR 7073 S. Darrow Road Townhomes (Informal) New Residential Construction (29 Unit Townhomes - District 3) Submitted by Hanna Cohan Plessner, Knez Homes a) Staff notes the AHBR discussed the proposal through multiple meetings in 2022. The applicant has revised the overall site layout, including orientation of garage doors. The Planning Commission will review the proposal for Conditional Use Review on May 13, 2024. b) The Architectural Design Standards state to avoid long unbroken expanses of roofs, roofs must be broken with cross gables, a change in roof height or orientation, or an offset of at least 18 inches. Question if each unit could have separate roof heights to further break up the massing. c) The Architectural Design Standards require variety between building designs. This includes variety amongst building units. Suggest further studying details such as differing front doors, bay configuration, and a masonry water table to distinguish individual units. d) Question if the “high visual impact” units would be differentiated, or if each style would follow the same design elements. e) Verify material would be applied consistently around each mass and end at an inside corner. f) As these are larger scale, multi-unit buildings, suggest additional detailing/finishes such as cement board siding, strong soffits with width/depth, and thicker trim, porch columns, and corner boards. g) Suggest the garage bump outs be widened to create a stronger break in the mass and consider a mix of gable and shed roof forms. Additionally, suggest the use of a second floor bay window to break up the large wall surface. Attachments: Preserve of Hudson AHRB Packet 2.23.22 AHBR Packet & Minutes VIII. Staff Update IX. Adjournment * * * The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner, an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7 Printed on 5/6/2024

Get email alerts for Hudson

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting