Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · January 8, 2025
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, January 8, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
Absent: 2 - Ms. Kenney and Mr. Workley
III. Election of Officers & Industrial Design Committee
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that Mr. Workley be
elected as Secretary. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
Election of Officers & Industrial Design Committee
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that Ms. Marzulla be
elected Vice Chair. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
Election of Officers & Industrial Design Committee
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that Mr. Caputo be
elected as Chair. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final January 8, 2025
Election of Officers & Industrial Design Committee
Chair Caputo appointed Mr. Workley and Ms. Marzullo to the Industrial Design
Subcommittee.
.
IV. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
V. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, to approve the Consent
Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
A. AHBR 24-13241306 Meadowood Lane
Accessory Structure (Pool House)
Attachments: 1306 Meadowood Lane AHBR Packet
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
VI. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final January 8, 2025
A. AHBR 24-426 13 N. Oviatt (Historic District)
Demolition (One-Story, Single-Family House)
Attachments: 13 N. Oviatt New Documents for 12.11 Meeting
13 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet 11.13 Meeting
Perspectus Consultant Report
13 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by reviewing the background of the application,
and noting the Board requested staff write a recommendation which incorporates the Board's
previous comments.
Ms. Marzulla made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the AHBR grant a certificate
of appropriateness for the proposed demolition at 13 N. Oviatt street, case number
24-426 based on the following findings:
1. The house is technically contributing to the historic district based on the age of
construction, but not historically significant. The Board notes the exact age of the house
is undetermined, as the evidence provided by the applicant suggests the house was built
later than the 1953 construction date on record with Summit County .
2. The house was constructed at a much later time than the surrounding late 1800s to
early 1900s homes, making it an anomaly to the street.
3. The house has evolved over time to include non-historic materials and does not have
the same architectural character as homes in the surrounding neighborhood . The
house’s incompatibility with the overall neighborhood is further emphasized by its
uncharacteristic size.
4. Overall, the house does not display discernable architectural value fitting of the
overall historic district.
5. The applicants testimony verified denial of such certificate would result in practical
difficulty. Based on the practical difficulty the applicants testimony verified denial of
such certificate would result in practical difficulty. Based on the practical difficulty
review criteria the AHBR finds:
a. While the property in question would yield a reasonable return and there could be
beneficial use of the property without the variance, the Board recognizes the applicant’s
predicament of renovating an approximate 800 sf house to accommodate a modern
family.
b. The request is substantial as the entire home would be demolished, but not impactful
due to the findings in this decision.
c.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be substantially altered .
d. The request would not adversely affect the delivery of governmental services .
e.The applicant has studied other methods such as additions, but those would not be
practical.
f. The spirit and intent behind the requirements would be observed and substantial
justice done by granting the certificate.
The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final January 8, 2025
B. AHBR 24-12802 Bradley Drive
New House (Single-Family Detached)
Attachments: 2 Bradley Drive AHBR Packet - 1.8.25 Meeting
2 Bradley Drive AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by: Displaying and describing the revised
elevations, reviewing the previous AHBR meeting and staff comments.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, described the diversity of houses on Bradley Drive, stated
the proposed house will be made to comply with the staff comments, noted the low sloped
roofs are a design strategy and he is willing to use ice shield under the shingles, stated the
siding will be horizontal painted Hardi-Board, and that the overhangs will be adjusted with
trim being added.
The Board, staff, and the applicant discussed having a consistent foundation around the
house, the window on the corner of the house which can be made to align with the window
above, that low slope hip roofs are being used, that the gable roof has a 12 inch overhang, the
types of windows to be used, and the lower front right window will have a trim piece to the
corner.
Mr. Ray made a motion, seconded by Ms.Sredinski, that the elevations be revised to:
Note smooth horizontal siding, asphalt shingles on the low slopped roof, show a
consistent foundation around the house, the lower right front window be moved to align
with the second story window and the adjoining back window be moved away from the
corner. The motion passed by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
C. AHBR 24-1049734 Barlow Road
New House (Single-Family Detached)
Attachments: 734 Barlow Rd. AHBR Packet - 1.8.25 Meeting
734 Barlow Rd. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting: The history of the application, the
revised orientation of the house relative to the street, the revisions to the elevations from the
previous AHBR meeting, and reviewed the staff comments.
Mr. Chris Brown, Prestige Builder Group, displayed a rendering of the proposed house with a
metal shed roof.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR
Application be approved as submitted. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
VII. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final January 8, 2025
A. AHBR 24-133753 First Street
Fence
Attachments: 53 First Street AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the proposed fence material and
height, and the staff comments.
Mr. Quinn Miller, Peninsula Architects, described the fence materials, entrance piers, and the
reason for using a swinging gate.
The Board, staff, and applicant discussed the contemporary design of the building matching
the fence, that staff has no negative comments regarding the swing gate, and than an exception
may be needed if steel is used.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that this AHBR
Application be approved and noted the exceptional design makes the use of steel tubing
acceptable. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
B. AHBR 24-13227508 N. Marblehead Road
Addition (Garage & Living Space)
Attachments: 7508 N. Marblehead AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the site plan and
elevations, and reviewing the staff comments.
The Board, Mr. Rick Loconti, homeowner, and staff discussed: The need for a larger house
because of their five children, that according to the LDC - the proposed addition is creating a
wing which is dominate over the existing main mass, ways to differentiate the wing from the
main mass, that the entire roof will be redone, that matching siding is available, the possibility
of adding a dormer to break up the roof, and the needed rear fenestration.
Mr. Loconti requested the application be continued.
This matter was continued.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final January 8, 2025
C. AHBR 24-13642332 Red Coach Lane
Addition (Gym & garage expansion)
Attachments: 2332 Red Coach Lane AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing and displaying the elevations and
reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Kevin Bowie, Architectural Options, stated he feels the design of the back of the existing
house favors the use of brick and siding on the proposed addition and the owners requested
the addition be a lighter color than the darker brink.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, the Board's consistent requirement for materials to
match around the structure unless the change takes place at an inside corner . Mr. Bowie
distributed drawing with the use of brick around the entire structure.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR
Application be approved with the use of brick all the way around the structure . The
motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
VIII. Other Business
A. AHBR 12-11-24Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
December 11, 2024.
Attachments: December 11, 2024 AHBR Meeting Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that the December 11,
2024, Minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
IX. Staff Update
Mr. Sugar noted an Industrial Design Subcommittee meeting will take place on January 13 ,
2025.
A. AHBR 7674 Discussion on the 2025 Council check-in
Attachments: City Council Memo - 2025
2025 Council Check-in Staff Memo
Ms. Krickovich discussed the Council check-in process.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approved the update for
Council as prepared by staff. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
X. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the meeting be
adjourned at 8:35 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote:
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final January 8, 2025
Aye: 4 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray and Ms. Sredinski
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, January 8, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Election of Officers & Industrial Design Committee
IV. Public Comment
V. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 1306 Meadowood Lane
24-1324 Accessory Structure (Pool House)
Submitted by Matthew Marks
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 1306 Meadowood Lane AHBR Packet
VI. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 1/3/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final January 8, 2025
A. AHBR 24-426 13 N. Oviatt (Historic District)
Demolition (One-Story, Single-Family House)
Submitted by Clayton Braham
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed at the December 11, 2024 meeting
and was tabled in order for staff to prepare a decision based on the
Board’s discussion.
b) Staff suggests the following motion based on the Boards findings of facts
and discussion:
The AHBR grants a certificate of appropriateness for the proposed
demolition at 13 N. Oviatt street, case number 24-426 based on the
following findings:
1. The house is technically contributing to the historic district based
on the age of construction, but not historically significant. The
Board notes the exact age of the house is undetermined, as the
evidence provided by the applicant suggests the house was built
later than the 1953 construction date on record with Summit
County.
2. The house was constructed at a much later time than the
surrounding late 1800s to early 1900s homes, making it an
anomaly to the street.
3. The house has evolved over time to include non-historic
materials and does not have the same architectural character as
homes in the surrounding neighborhood. The house’s
incompatibility with the overall neighborhood is further
emphasized by its uncharacteristic size.
4. Overall, the house does not display discernable architectural
value fitting of the overall historic district.
5. The applicants testimony verified denial of such certificate would
result in practical difficulty. Based on the practical difficulty
review criteria the AHBR finds:
a. While the property in question would yield a reasonable
return and there could be beneficial use of the property
without the variance, the Board recognizes the applicant’s
predicament of renovating an approximate 800 sf house to
accommodate a modern family.
b. The request is substantial as the entire home would be
demolished, but not impactful due to the findings in this
decision.
c.The essential character of the neighborhood would not be
substantially altered.
d. The request would not adversely affect the delivery of
governmental services.
e.The applicant has studied other methods such as additions, but
those would not be practical.
f. The spirit and intent behind the requirements would be
observed and substantial justice done by granting the
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 1/3/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final January 8, 2025
certificate.
Attachments: 13 N. Oviatt New Documents for 12.11 Meeting
13 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet 11.13 Meeting
Perspectus Consultant Report
13 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet
Legislative History
5/8/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
11/13/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
12/11/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
B. AHBR 2 Bradley Drive
24-1280 New House (Single-Family Detached)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed at the December 11, 2024 AHBR
meeting. During the meeting the Board requested the following:
· The applicant explore a different design that would better comply
with the permitted building types within District 4.
· The applicant revise the design to depict a more traditional design
with overhangs, eaves, siding and window openings that are more
compatible with neighboring properties.
· Revise the design to comply with fenestration requirements on the
house and the proposed accessory structure.
b) Staff notes the applicant did revise the plans to depict a more traditional
two-story wing design as well as included overhangs, trim and eaves that
are more compatible with the neighboring properties.
c) Section III-1(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states exposed
foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all
elevations. Revise elevations to depict a more consistently applied exposed
foundation on all elevations.
Attachments: 2 Bradley Drive AHBR Packet - 1.8.25 Meeting
2 Bradley Drive AHBR Packet
Legislative History
12/11/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 1/3/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final January 8, 2025
C. AHBR 734 Barlow Road
24-1049 New House (Single-Family Detached)
Submitted by Robyn Jones, Prestige Builder Group
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed at the December 11, 2024 AHBR
meeting.
b) The Board tabled the review to allow the applicant to revise the site plan
to meet LDC orientation requirements or to pursue a variance.
c) Staff has reviewed the submitted revised house orientation with the
applicant and notes that it meets the LDC standard. The house would be
oriented at a similar angle to the neighboring properties.
d) Staff notes the AHBR has the following discussion points during the
meeting relative to design-
· The design to have a more consistent window grid design.
· Revise the plans to meet fenestration requirements.
· A more consistent roof material at the front porch.
Attachments: 734 Barlow Rd. AHBR Packet - 1.8.25 Meeting
734 Barlow Rd. AHBR Packet
Legislative History
12/11/24 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
VII. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 1/3/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final January 8, 2025
A. AHBR 53 First Street
24-1337 Fence
Submitted by Quinn Miller, Peninsula Architects
a) Section III-1(f)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state except in
District 8, only the following fence materials shall be allowed: wood (or
vinyl closely resembling wood), wrought iron (or aluminum closely
resembling wrought iron), stone, or brick. All other fence materials,
including chain link and vinyl-clad chain link, are prohibited. Staff notes
the applicant is proposing a steel tube material.
b) Section III-1(f)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states fence
heights and materials shall be compatible with their site location and
surrounding development. Fences in the front yard shall be more formal in
design and lower in height when sited close to the street or sidewalk.
Fences in the rear yard offer more flexibility with greater allowance for
height and design. Staff notes the fence is depicted to be 4 feet 2 inches at
its highest point.
c) A site plan is to be submitted by a licensed surveyor to verify the fence
would be located entirely on private property.
d) The applicant is to provide documentation verifying the hedges would meet
the site distance requirements of Section 1207.04(s) - the applicant is to
refer to figure 18 of this section.
Attachments: 53 First Street AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 1/3/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final January 8, 2025
B. AHBR 7508 N. Marblehead Road
24-1322 Addition (Garage & Living Space)
Submitted by Rick Loconti
a) Section IV-4(b)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state wings may
not be larger or taller than the main body of the structure. Staff notes the
proposed addition is approximately 1,600 square feet and the main body of
the structure is approximately 1,100 square feet.
b) Section IV-4(a) states the two-story wing type has a main body that is two
stories tall and centrally located in the structure. Staff notes the proposed
addition would cause the main body to not be centrally located.
c) Section IV-4(c) states all roofs in all the wings must be the same shape as
the main body. Staff notes the addition would incorporate a gable roof
while the main body is a hip roof. Additionally, question the roof line and
how the addition would intersect the existing on the front elevation.
d) Section III-1(g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards state large
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Staff notes the proposed
plans depict the removal of a window that would create an expansion of 19
feet between the door and the window on the rear elevation.
e) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards state
replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing
materials. Question how the siding will blend in with the existing on the
rear elevation and where windows will be removed on the rear and left
elevations.
Attachments: 7508 N. Marblehead AHBR Packet
C. AHBR 2332 Red Coach Lane
24-1364 Addition (Gym & garage expansion)
Submitted by Kevin Bowie
a) Section IV-4(d)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state the
materials used in any mass must be applied consistently on that mass on all
sides of the structure. Revise plans to depict a consistent material around the
entirety of the proposed addition.
Attachments: 2332 Red Coach Lane AHBR Packet
VIII. Other Business
A. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
12-11-24 December 11, 2024.
Attachments: December 11, 2024 AHBR Meeting Minutes - Draft
IX. Staff Update
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 1/3/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final January 8, 2025
A. AHBR 7674 Discussion on the 2025 Council check-in
Attachments: City Council Memo - 2025
2025 Council Check-in Staff Memo
X. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7 Printed on 1/3/2025
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.