Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · February 12, 2025
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 12, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Manko
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
IV. Consent Applications
There were no Consent Applications.
V. Old Business
There was no Old Business.
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2025
A. AHBR 25-12 171 Brentwood Drive
Alteration (Siding Replacement)
Attachments: 171 Brentwood Dr. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the house, describing the project,
reviewing the applicable LDC, and staff comments.
Mr. Brad Hoder, manufacturer's representative and the Board discussed the areas on the front
of the house the LDC would allow board and batten siding, and that if the siding terminates at
an inside corner it could be administratively approved.
Mr. Hoder stated he will discuss this with the homeowners.
This matter was discussed
B. AHBR 24-880 1769 Edgar Drive
Alterations (Windows)
Attachments: 1769 Edgar Dr. AHBR Packet 2.12.25 Meeting
1769 Edgar Dr. Previously Approved Plans
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting the project was approved in August of
2021, reviewing the changes from the previous approval, and the design standards regarding
fenestration every twelve feet.
Mr. John Bolovan, homeowner, stated a dormer will be added at a future time when finances
allow, that a window on the east side will lessen security, that the rear western gable location
will eventually have a chimney, and the eastern gable area will be for a workshop where a
blank interior wall is desired, Mr. Bolovan also believes a trellis will look nicer than a
window on this wall and stated that the house has been transformed from a run down not
improved house to its present state with plans to become better and better .
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: The chimney that was previously approved to be
removed, the requirement that work must be completed within one year of permit issuance -
with the possibility of a six-month extension, replacing the three windows with a trellis while
noting the house is on a large property and there are no neighbors who will see the back of the
house, the Board's concern over having areas that will have a trellis instead of windows, that if
wood trim is placed around the trellises it will give a better look, faux windows in place of the
trellises, that architectural details have been allowed in the past to satisfy the fenestration
requirement, and that a minimum of 4-inch trim be used as the trellis picture frame trim.
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, to deny the removal of the dormer
so as to allow a time frame to reinstall the dormer, and to approve the trellises at three
locations, with a minimum of four-inch trim to picture frame the trellises. The motion
was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Manko
Nay: 1 - Ms. Marzulla
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2025
C. AHBR 25-65 16 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alterations (Bedrooms, Dining room & porches)
Attachments: 16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 3.12 Meeting
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.26 Meeting
16 Owen Brown Consultant Report
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.12 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project, displaying the proposed
elevations, noting conflicts with the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines, and recommending
a site visit be conducted.
Mr. Mark Madar, homeowner, and Mr. Gordon Costlow, architect, noted the Hudson Library
has assisted with researching this house, that in the past thirty-years Mr . Madar has purchased
and restored many homes in Hudson, that this building was originally on Clinton Street and
owned as a utility structure by the Hudson Telephone Company, and it was moved by John
Morris and moved to Owen Brown Street onto an open lot. The library staff believes this
structure is from the 1940s and moved to this location in the 1950s. Additional history was
given by Mr. Madar.
Mr. Madar displayed photos of the deteriorated windows and siding and stated his goal is to
restore the house using the recommended materials, he then explained the need to enlarge the
1400 square feet house by 1000 square feet to make it livable for his daughter and her family .
Mr. Costlow discussed the deteriorated state of the house and the staff comments .
1. The desire to not have a front door with the possibility of building a front porch.
2. Mr. Madar noted that no pictures of the house in earlier days have been found, and the first
floor design is not useful at present.
3. The full siding replacement is needed because of the poor condition of the existing shake
shingles, and that a different siding, possibly board and batten, be used to differentiate the
addition.
4. That the shingles on the new porch roof are to be determined and the applicant is flexible as
to type.
5. The applicant is open to a wrap around porch.
The Board and applicant discussed the meaning of "distinguishing elements" on the house .
Mr. Madar noted the proposed larger windows are partly intended as escape windows and are
more practical for use.
Mr. Madar asked the Board if this building, being a utility structure, changes the Board's view
of allowing changes. The Board noted that since the structure was built prior to 1963 it is
considered historical and the history of the house also leads to its historical value .
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to conduct a site visit with
the historical consultant present. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Manko
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2025
A. AHBR 7753 Historic District Landmark Program Update
Attachments: Historic Landmark Update Memo
Map of Properties by Year
Staff discussed the Historic District Landmark Program which was part of the 2024 AHBR
goals and envisioned for completion by the end of 2025. Ms. Krickovich then reviewed the
staff memo, the Map of Properties by Year, the steps in the proposed project, and the need for
a working group to assist staff.
The Board and staff discussed how many of the 100-year old houses have HHA plaques -
which is unknown, that it is unknown how many of the properties have OHI forms, the
advantages and disadvantages of being designated a Landmark and that this information must
be transparent to homeowners.
The Board and staff discussed: Beginning contacting residents of houses that are 100-years
old and older, that all the work by staff and Board member must be done in the public view,
possible methods of determining HHA plaqued houses, and that any outside change to a house
requires a permit which will assist in determining Landmark qualifying houses.
Ms. Krickovich noted that a Landmark qualifying checklist already exists and that the Historic
Consultant can be used to modify the form if needed.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to proceed with the
Historic District Landmark Program Update. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Manko
B. AHBR 1-22-25 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
January 22, 2025.
Attachments: January 22, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that the January 22, 2025,
Minutes be approved as amended. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley and Ms.
Sredinski
Abstain: 1 - Manko
VIII. Staff Update
The members of the Historic District Landmark Program Update working group were
determined to be: Ms. Marzulla, Ms. Kenney, and Ms. Manko, with Mr. Workley as the
alternate.
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, to adjourn the meeting
at 8:52 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Manko
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 12, 2025
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 12, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
V. Old Business
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 25-12 171 Brentwood Drive
Alteration (Siding Replacement)
Submitted by Patrick Nussbeck
a) Section IV(1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state - The
materials used in the main body must be applied consistently on that mass
on all sides of the structure. Revise to depict siding applied consistently
around the mass.
b) Section IV-4(d)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states a different
material may be used on building projection gable ends, entrance recesses,
or to emphasize the horizontal or vertical divisions of the building. Suggest
revising to only depict the proposed board and batten siding along the
entrance recess.
Attachments: 171 Brentwood Dr. AHBR Packet
Legislative History
1/22/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 2/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 12, 2025
B. AHBR 24-880 1769 Edgar Drive
Alterations (Windows)
Submitted by John Bolovan
a) Staff notes this addition application was previously reviewed and approved
in August of 2021. The applicant is now proposing changes to the
approved plans.
b) The applicant is requesting to remove the dormer on the south elevation as
well as remove windows and replace with a garden trellis on the north and
east elevations.
c) Section III-1(g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards state large
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet. Revise plans to depict a
window or a door to meet this regulation.
Attachments: 1769 Edgar Dr. AHBR Packet 2.12.25 Meeting
1769 Edgar Dr. Previously Approved Plans
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 2/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 12, 2025
C. AHBR 25-65 16 Owen Brown (Historic District)
Addition (Bedrooms, Dining Room & Porches)
Submitted by Mark Madar
a) Staff notes the proposed work includes an addition to the rear and right
elevations, installation of a dormer on the left elevation, front and side
porches, full siding replacement and window relocation and replacement.
b) The Secretary of Interior Standards and Preservation Briefs relative to
additions on a historic building:
· Appendix 1(2) “The historic character of a property shall be retained
and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of
features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.”
Staff notes the proposed left elevation and window placement
would be impactful. Additionally, staff questions the front door
opening and roof removal from the historic mass. Suggest
re-establishing the front door and a wrap around porch.
· Appendix 1(6) “Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired
rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires
replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the
old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where
possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be
substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.”
Staff notes the applicant submitted photographs showing the
deterioration of the siding; however, the existing siding is a shake
material and the applicant is proposing hardi board.
· Appendix 1(9) “New additions, exterior alterations, or related new
construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize
the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and
shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural
features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its
environment.” Staff questions the proposed dormer work and the
granular flat roof on the porch and if they are appropriate.
· The National Park Service Preservation Brief - “The new addition
should be smaller than the historic building - it should be
subordinate in both size and design to the historic building.” Staff
notes the rear addition is lower in height than the main mass;
however, is flush with the existing mass on the left elevation.
Suggest an inset from the existing mass.
c) Staff suggests using this meeting to gather information, set up a site visit to
further evaluate existing conditions and to request the assistance of the
Historic Consultant.
Attachments: 16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 2/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 12, 2025
A. AHBR 7753 Historic District Landmark Program Update
Attachments: Historic Landmark Update Memo
Map of Properties by Year
B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
1-22-25 January 22, 2025.
Attachments: January 22, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 2/7/2025
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.