Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · February 26, 2025
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 26, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Ms. Manko
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the Consent
Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Ms. Manko
A. AHBR 25-120 172 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Fence (6-foot, Cedar)
Attachments: 172 Aurora St. AHBR Packet
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 26, 2025
B. AHBR 25-73 5947 Laurawood Lane
Accessory Structure (Shed)
Attachments: 5947 Laurawood Lane AHBR Packet
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
There was no Old Business.
A. AHBR 25-65 16 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alterations (Bedroom, Dining room & Porches)
Attachments: 16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 3.12 Meeting
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.26 Meeting
16 Owen Brown Consultant Report
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.12 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting it was previously reviewed by AHBR
and a site visit was conducted.
Mr. Mark Madar, homeowner, described how the revised application was driven by Historic
Preservationist comments, including: the redesigned front porch, the gable roof above the
front door, the use of lap siding, the west elevation gable dormers, aligning the windows,
keeping the windows on the original part of the home, the rear elevation 10-inch inset, and on
the east side, the window alignment and the ridge line. Mr. Madar also noted that the shutters
by the door have been removed since at least the 1970s, and while the Preservationist
recommended keeping the front door - it is in the middle of a room - Mr. Madar would like to
eliminate it. It was also noted that all the windows are aluminum clad with wood on the
interior.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: the need for staff to review the proposed changes,
having two or three windows on the front of the house, the location of the side door in relation
to the front door, the fact that the front door adds to the historic significance of the house, the
roof type over the porch with needed decorative trims, and the possibility of putting a rail in
front of the front door to minimize its look,
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR
Application be continued to allow staff to review the revised elevations and submit
comments to the Board. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Ms. Manko
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 26, 2025
A. AHBR 25-123 145 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Demolition & Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)
Attachments: 145 Aurora AHBR Packet
145 Aurora AHBR Packet 3.12 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the existing detached
garage, and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations.
Mr. Kody Kocias, and Mr. Joe Matava, Peninsula Architects, noted the building is in poor
condition and falling down, stated they do not know the age of the building, and displayed
photos of the existing shed with a bowing roof and rotten wood. The Board noted that for
demolition to be approved it must be demonstrated that the building does not have historic
significance and that the concrete block foundation is falling apart.
The Board, applicant, and staff, noted: the height and setbacks are within the code, the
materials are natural wood and the windows are Pella Reserve. Mr. Matava noted: There is no
water or electric in the building indicating it will not be used as a dwelling, why the windows
are located in the shown positions, the large wall area without fenestration and possible
solutions, the possibility of moving the windows in from the wall to the middle to reduce the
fenestration issue, and that this design matches the existing house better than the present shed .
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application
be continued. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Ms. Manko
B. AHBR 25-79 252 North Main Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alteration to Accessory Structure (Barn)
Attachments: 252 N. Main AHBR Packet
252 N. Main AHBR Packet 3.12.25 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the elevations and
project, describing the Secretary of the Interior's recommendations, and reviewing the staff
comments and recommendations.
Mr. Stuart Hamilton, applicant, stated he will reuse boards down to the deck height, that the
previous foundation failed, and that Summit County requires deck railing at 30-inches and this
deck is 18-inches.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: conducting a site visit, that the new foundation
used poured concrete, that a new frame was constructed on the inside of the barn, that the
existing barn siding and windows will be reused, and that no materials will be purchased .
The Board decided to conduct a site visit.
This matter was continued
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 26, 2025
C. AHBR 24-12587559 Andover Way
Addition (3 Seasons Room)
Attachments: 7559 Andover Way AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by: displaying the elevations, describing the
project, noting that screens on the existing porch will be replaced with windows - which
makes it an addition, and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations .
Mr. Kender, applicant, the Board, and staff, discussed: The required foundation, that windows
will be installed and possibly removed for part of the year, that heat will not be included, the
location of the stairs, that an exception will be needed to not require a foundation if this is
considered an enclosed structure, the definition of an enclosed structure, the proposed type of
windows and glass, that if only screens are used - that the applicant could easily be
application could easily be approved if only screens were used, that a foundation will be built
only under the new portion of the build, that a consistent foundation around the house is
required by the building code, the view of the deck from the backyard will not allow the
existing foundation to be seen if the new deck is built, that a veneer with regular deck skirting
could be used, that a combination of brick veneer and skirting be used around the deck, and
that the roof will be re shingled in its entirety.
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, to approve the application
with the following conditions: 1) A faux foundation be around the three sides of the new
extended enclosure that matches the house. 2) To have skirting on the three sides of the
expanded deck. 3) The roof be one consistent shingle. The motion was approved by the
following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Ms. Manko
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR 2-12-25 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
February 12, 2025.
Attachments: February 12, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
The minutes approval was postponed to the next AHBR meeting.
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Ms. Manko
VIII. Staff Update
Ms. Krickovich noted: 1) Three members of the Historic Landmark subcommittee will meet.
2) At Council's request AHBR's submittal requirements will be codified. 3) Text changes in
the LDC regarding the Historic Consultant.
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that the meeting be
adjourned at 8:49 p.m.. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski
and Ms. Manko
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final February 26, 2025
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, February 26, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 25-120 172 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Fence (6-foot, Cedar)
Submitted by David Moorhead
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 172 Aurora St. AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 25-73 5947 Laurawood Lane
Accessory Structure (Shed)
Submitted by Andrew Stegmeier
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 5947 Laurawood Lane AHBR Packet
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 2/21/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 26, 2025
A. AHBR 25-65 16 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alterations (Bedrooms, Dining room & porches)
Submitted by Mark Madar
a) Staff notes this project was reviewed at the February 12th AHBR meeting.
The Board conducted a site visit on February 18th and requested
assistance from the consultant.
b) The consultant report is attached for the Board to review. The applicant
has requested to attend the meeting to discuss the project with the Board.
Attachments: 16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.26 Meeting
16 Owen Brown Consultant Report
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.12 Meeting
Legislative History
2/12/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 2/21/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 26, 2025
A. AHBR 25-123 145 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)
Submitted by Kody Kocias, Peninsula Architects
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to remove the existing detached
garage and construct a new detached garage. Question the age of the
existing garage and if it is contributing to the Historic District and
appropriate to remove. Submit existing photos of the detached garage by
2/24/25 in order to provide time to review.
b) Section I-2 of the Architectural Design Standards state “New buildings
and alterations shall respect the existing context and framework. The
design of any building shall be judged in reference to its site and the
character of its surroundings, not as an independent object. The site plan
for all new buildings shall be prepared with a clear understanding of the
framework that exists or is being created in a particular area, through
development standards, zoning and other regulations.” Staff notes the
existing garage was lower in height and setback farther from the side
property line. Question if the new garage should depict a lower height to
better accommodate existing and surrounding site conditions or could be
set back to maintain a similar footprint.
c) Section III-1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Enclosed
accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to the main
body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or materials.”
Revise elevations to note materials and how they relate to the existing
house.
d) Section III-1(d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state “All facades
(including the rear) over twelve (12) feet long shall have at least one
window or door opening. Fenestration placement on the accessory
structure shall be proportional to the house.” Question the window
arrangement on the right elevation.
e) Section III-1(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Exposed
foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all
elevations.” Question the exposed foundation on the left elevation.
f) Submit specification sheets of siding, roof, window and door materials.
g) A survey would be required to confirm setbacks before final approval.
Attachments: 145 Aurora AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 2/21/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 26, 2025
B. AHBR 25-79 252 North Main Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alteration to Accessory Structure (Barn)
Submitted by Stuart Hamilton
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to add two open roof porches to both
sides of the existing barn, remove/add windows and doors and remove the
horizonal wood exposed foundation and replace with vertical siding to
match the existing.
b) Appendix 1(6) of the Secretary of Interior Standards state “Deteriorated
historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity
of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new
feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual
qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features
shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.”
The applicant is proposing to utilize existing materials and repurpose
windows and doors. Question how the windows will be removed and
replaced with existing siding.
c) Appendix 1(9) of the Secretary of Interior Standards states “New
additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not
destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work
shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.” Staff notes the proposal
would impact the historic siding on the barn.
d) Section III-1(g)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state “All decks
and porches without a perimeter foundation exposing more than eighteen
(18) inches between the facia and the grade must be screened with
compatible materials or landscaping unless a full story is exposed below.”
Revise plans to depict skirting or landscaping in order to meet this
requirement.
e) Question if a railing would be required with the Summit County Building
Department.
Attachments: 252 N. Main AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 2/21/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final February 26, 2025
C. AHBR 7559 Andover Way
24-1258 Addition (3 Seasons Room)
Submitted by Andrew Kender
a) Section IV-4(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Materials
used on an open porch or screen room need not be the same as other
materials in the structure, but should be related to materials used in the
details of the structure.” Staff notes the applicant is replacing the existing
screens with glass windows, which would create an enclosed glass porch.
b) Section IV-4(h)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Additions
should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by
incorporating materials and a foundation to match.” Question if the
design could be revised to include the appearance of an exposed
foundation with applied brick veneer to match the house or by extending
the deck around the mass.
c) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards state
“Replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing
materials.” Question how the existing roof shingle will blend with the new
material.
d) Submit an elevation drawing of the left side of the proposed addition.
Attachments: 7559 Andover Way AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
2-12-25 February 12, 2025.
Attachments: February 12, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 2/21/2025
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.