Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · March 12, 2025
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic
Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of
the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
Absent: 1 - Ms. Kenney
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the
Board. There were no comments.
IV. Consent Applications
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
A. AHBR 25-155 00 Bridgewater Blvd
Ground Sign (Residential Entrance Sign)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 00 Bridgewater AHBR Packet
approved
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
B. AHBR 25-117 46 Ravenna St. (The Poppy Shop & Hudson Plant Co.)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 46 Ravenna AHBR Packet
approved
V. Old Business
A. AHBR 25-65 16 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alterations (Bedroom, Dining room & Porches)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 3.12 Meeting
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.26 Meeting
16 Owen Brown Consultant Report
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.12 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by reviewing changes made to the application
since the last AHBR meeting.
Mr. Mark Madar was present for the meeting.
The Board, applicant, and staff: Noted no cut sheet was submitted for the front door, a desire
for cedar lap siding which the applicant noted is cost prohibitive and difficult to find,
difficulty with the pitch of the roof over the front door, and the possibility of removing the
pitch above the door,
approved as amended
Aye: 5 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
Nay: 1 - Ms. Marzulla
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
B. AHBR 25-123 145 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Demolition & Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 145 Aurora AHBR Packet
145 Aurora AHBR Packet 3.12 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting a site visit was conducted on March 4th,
for the Board to observe the garage.
Mr. Kody Kocias, Peninsula Architects, was present for the meeting.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed the demolition noting the structure is compromised .
Regarding the proposed new structure, the Board and applicant discussed the door type .
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
C. AHBR 25-79 252 North Main Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alteration to Accessory Structure (Barn)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 252 N. Main AHBR Packet
252 N. Main AHBR Packet 3.12.25 Meeting
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting a site visit was conducted on March 4 ,
2025, and no changes were made to the application.
Ms. Bridget Williams, friend of the applicant, was present for the meeting.
The Board discussed the decking on the left side of the deck, which is under 20-inches high,
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
A. AHBR 25-112 225 W. Prospect Street
Demolition (Single-family dwelling)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 225 W. Prospect St. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the 1900 era house which
is in deplorable condition.
Mr. Curt Van Blarcum noted the history of the property is difficult to find, and that the house
is decrepit condition.
The Board discussed whether or not the structure has any historical significance .
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
B. AHBR 25-130 180 W. Streetsboro Street (Bell’s Barber Shop)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 180 W. Streetsboro AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the building and proposed
sign, and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Falih gave the Board a revised sign plan, with a matt finish, boarder, and centered on the
building.
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
C. AHBR 25-180 82 First Street (Talbot’s)
Alteration (Awnings)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 82 First St. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the building and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. William Morse, Ohio Awning: Displayed a sample of the proposed fabric which has a
satin finish, and described the existing material and proposed frame.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed the LDC requirements for awning fabric,
approved as amended
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
D. AHBR 25-133 2732 Middleton Road
Accessory Structure & Alterations (Detached Garage)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 2736 Middleeton Rd AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the elevations, describing the
project, and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations.
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, noted the rear of the house has an existing bump-out and
described the new additions and the homeowner’s desire is to replace all the windows -
however cost considerations may not allow a complete window replacement . Mr. Bailey also
described the proposed materials, the types of siding to be used, and that the overhangs will
match.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: That the Board is responsible for approving or not
approving the window design based on the plans before the Board at this meeting and that the
Board may make an exception, the proposed contrasting color of the garage, the house in
relation to the neighborhood, that the HOA will also need to approve an attached garage, a
reconfiguration of the windows on the front of the addition to match the rest of the house, that
from the design standards the proposed plan meets the LDC criteria, and the addition
foundation will match the existing foundation.
approved as amended
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
E. AHBR 25-163 7706 Oxgate Court
Alteration (Siding)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 7706 Oxgate Ct. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the house, describing the proposed
materials and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations.
The applicant displayed a rendering of the proposed finished project .
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed the requirement for termination at an inside corner
or wrapping around the entire house. The applicant agreed to the LDC requirement which
may be administratively approved by staff.
discussed
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
F. AHBR 25-170 2425 Hudson Aurora Road
Addition (2nd Story Bed & Bath)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 2425 Hudson Aurora Rd AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by describing the project and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Jim Dombrowski, Brandywine Construction, agreed to comply with the staff comments .
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
G. AHBR 25-178 6575 Dunbarton Drive
Addition (In-law suite)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 6575 Dunbarton AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the proposed project
and reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Brian Kuck, Sissel Architectural and Design, noted the brick veneer and foundation will
continue around the entire house. Mr. Kuck also requested that he be allowed two skylights in
the roof of the addition. The Board stated flat skylights may be administratively approved by
staff.
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
H. AHBR 25-131 549 West Streetsboro Street
New Construction (Single-family dwelling)
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: 549 W. Streetsboro AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying the site plan, describing the project,
and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations.
Mr. John Russell, and Ms. Elaine Schmidt, Prestige Builder Group, described how they
believe the LDC may allow the proposed design since the house sits 130 feet from the street,
and the proposed house is on eight acres.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: How the 130-foot rule applies to forward facing
garage doors, not wings, the homeowner's desire to have a larger setback, the inconsistency of
the setbacks around the proposed house, the purpose of requesting two forward additions, the
possibility of placing the wings in the back of the house, and the size of the property will
allow other designs which do not violate the LDC.
Conversation took place regarding having only one wing forward and the Board’s need to see
this site plan in relation to other houses in the development.
The homeowner and the Board discussed whether or not the Board would allow any greater
setback from the road with a general consensus that a greater setback could be favorably
considered by the Board.
The applicant requested the application be continued.
continued
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
I. AHBR 24-1346Preserve of Hudson Townhomes
New Residential Construction (29 Townhome Units - District 3)
Submitted by Hanna Cohan, Knez Homes, Triban Investment
a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the May 8, 2024 and April 9, 2025
meetings.
b) The applicant has submitted revisions based on previous board
discussions. Revisions include additional variety in dormer design, porch
post design, gable end design, and front projection design.
c) Staff has compiled the attached redline revisions documenting the
observed changes; however, the applicant should present all changes to
the board.
d) Revise elevations to label exposed foundation material.
e) Question the proposed porch width and if it is functional.
f) Question if the shake siding along of lot 5 terminates at an inside corner
along the left elevation.
g) Submit the sign plan on a surveyed site plan. Staff notes the property
boundary along Darrow Road is inaccurately depicted on the submitted
sign plan.
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: Elevations - Revised
Elevations - Staff mark up of changes
Elevations - Previous
Presentation - Revised
Sign and Pavilion
Product Specification Sheets
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by: Noting the application was reviewed on an
informal basis on May 8, 2024, describing the proposed project, and reviewing the staff
comments and recommendations.
Ms. Hanna Cohan, Triban Investments, stated her goal for this meeting is to receive feedback
from the Board in preparation for the next meeting. Ms. Cohan also distributed additional
information to the Board, and noted she is open to providing more variety to the design of the
buildings while maintaining a cohesive overall design.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed staff’s comments regarding the Farmhouse,
Cottage, and the Traditional style units, with Triban being open to make revisions to the
designs as suggested by staff and AHBR.
The Board noted this property which will have little or no visibility from the street.
Ms. Cohan described the proposed monument sign which will be near the road with a matt
finish, and will fit the commercial corridor where the sign will sit. The Board noted
appreciation for the proposed brick as opposed to a poured sign and that the sign will not be
near the proposed houses.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 8
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
Ms. Cohan noted Triban’s desire to get full approval in April 2025 because of time limits
connected to the permits.
The Board continued the application at the request of the applicant.
continued
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR 2-12-25 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
February 12, 2025.
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: February 12, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
approved
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
B. AHBR 2-26-25 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
February 26, 2025.
Sponsors: Board of Zoning & Building Appeals
Attachments: February 26, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
approved as amended
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
VIII. Staff Update
Ms. Kirckovich reviewed:
1. The subcommittee meeting for Historical Landmarks.
2. City Council’s ordnance regarding Public Comments at public meetings.
discussed
IX. Adjournment
adjourned
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 9
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final March 12, 2025
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written
summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes
shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in
accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252.04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic
Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission .
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 10
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 25-155 00 Bridgewater Blvd
Ground Sign (Residential Entrance Sign)
Submitted by Joe Berdine (Signarama)
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 00 Bridgewater AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 25-117 46 Ravenna St. (The Poppy Shop & Hudson Plant Co.)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Submitted by Lauren Donatelli
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 46 Ravenna AHBR Packet
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
A. AHBR 25-65 16 Owen Brown Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alterations (Bedroom, Dining room & Porches)
Submitted by Mark Madar
a) Staff notes this application was reviewed at the 2/12 and 2/26 meetings.
The Board requested assistance of the Consultant (report attached).
b) The applicant has made the following changes to reflect the comments
from the Consultant Report:
· Retaining the front door location on the historic mass.
· Retaining the window locations on the left elevation of the historic
mass. Staff notes the windows will be replaced with the Pella Lifestyle
series, which is an approved window within the historic district.
Question if the existing trim will remain as this is historic material.
· Incorporating a wraparound porch that does not extend past the west
and north walls of the house. Additionally, the applicant depicts the roof
at a lower height to reflect the Board’s suggestion at the February 26th
AHBR meeting.
· Incorporating a steeper roof pitch on the right elevation as well as
aligning the second and first floor windows.
· Depicts the use of hardi-board siding on the existing mass and the
proposed additions.
· Incorporating a gable roof on the proposed dormers on the left
elevation as well as removing the small clerestory window.
· Adjusting the proposed addition to depict an inset on the left elevation
in order to comply with the National Park Service Preservation Briefs.
Attachments: 16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 3.12 Meeting
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.26 Meeting
16 Owen Brown Consultant Report
16 Owen Brown AHBR Packet 2.12 Meeting
Legislative History
2/12/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
2/26/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
B. AHBR 25-123 145 Aurora Street (Historic District)
Demolition & Accessory Structure (Detached Garage)
Submitted by Kody Kocias, Peninsula Architects
a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the February 26th AHBR meeting.
The Board requested a site visit, which was conducted on March 4th.
b) Staff notes the applicant is requesting to demolish the existing accessory
structure on the property. Based on the pictorial evidence the applicant
provided and site visit observations, the Board could consider the
following when making a decision:
· The structure is technically contributing to the historic district based
on the age of construction, but not historically significant. The exact
age is undetermined, as it doesn’t seem to be a 1920’s building (per
Summit County records).
· The existing structure appears to have significant deterioration based
on the pictures provided by the applicant and the site visit
observations. Staff notes Appendix 1(6) states “Deteriorated historic
features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new
feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual
qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing
features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial
evidence.”
c) Section I-2 of the Architectural Design Standards state “New buildings
and alterations shall respect the existing context and framework. The
design of any building shall be judged in reference to its site and the
character of its surroundings, not as an independent object. The site plan
for all new buildings shall be prepared with a clear understanding of the
framework that exists or is being created in a particular area, through
development standards, zoning and other regulations.” Staff notes the
existing garage was lower in height and setback farther from the side
property line. Question if the new garage should depict a lower height to
better accommodate existing and surrounding site conditions or could be
set back to maintain a similar footprint.
d) The Board requested the applicant relocate the door and window on the
left elevation towards the center to better accommodate fenestration
regulations. The applicant revised the drawings to depict this request.
Attachments: 145 Aurora AHBR Packet
145 Aurora AHBR Packet 3.12 Meeting
Legislative History
2/26/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
C. AHBR 25-79 252 North Main Street (Historic District)
Addition & Alteration to Accessory Structure (Barn)
Submitted by Stuart Hamilton
a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the February 26th AHBR meeting.
The Board requested a site visit that was conducted on March 4th.
b) Appendix 1(6) of the Secretary of Interior Standards state “Deteriorated
historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity
of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new
feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual
qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features
shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.”
The applicant is proposing to utilize existing materials and repurpose
windows and doors.
c) Appendix 1(9) of the Secretary of Interior Standards states “New
additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not
destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work
shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic
integrity of the property and its environment.” Staff notes the applicant is
proposing to remove historic siding to accommodate the new roof
structures; however, the removed siding will replace the horizontal boards
at the existing foundation.
Attachments: 252 N. Main AHBR Packet
252 N. Main AHBR Packet 3.12.25 Meeting
Legislative History
2/26/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
VI. New Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
A. AHBR 25-112 225 W. Prospect Street
Demolition (Single-family dwelling)
Submitted by Curt Van Blarcum
a) The applicant is proposing the demolition of the existing house on the
property. Staff notes this is an active code enforcement case with the city
regarding property in disrepair.
b) Staff notes no architectural significance due to the material changes and
deterioration over time.
c) As the property is outside of the Historic District and not an individual
historic landmark, the AHBR may only make the following
recommendation upon review: The Architectural and Historic Board of
Review finds the structure at 225 W. Prospect Street (does) or (does not)
have historic or architectural significance. Further, the Board finds that
the applicant for a permit to demolish this building will not voluntarily
consent to the retention of this building.
Attachments: 225 W. Prospect St. AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 25-130 180 W. Streetsboro Street (Bell’s Barber Shop)
Sign (Wall Sign)
Submitted by Kaldon Al Falih
a) Staff notes the sign plan for 180 W. Streetsboro St. states a polyurethan
resin panel with a black painted raised boarder. The applicant is
proposing a polyethylene panel with no black boarder. Revise the
elevations to depict a raised black boarder.
b) Section V-2(b) of the Architectural Design Standards state “The sign and
associated lighting fixtures should complement the architecture of the
building on which it is placed and should be placed in an appropriate
location on the building facade.” Question the location of the sign and if it
should be centered on the wall to align with surrounding signs.
c) Section V-5(c)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Signs
should have a matte finish, not have a glossy or reflective finish.” Confirm
the sign will have a matte finish.
Attachments: 180 W. Streetsboro AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
C. AHBR 25-180 82 First Street (Talbot’s)
Alteration (Awnings)
Submitted by William Morse, Ohio Awning
a) Staff notes the applicant is replacing the existing awnings with new
awnings that will be the same size but different style.
b) Section IV-9(d)(5) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Signs and
awnings, if used, shall fit entirely within the width of the storefront and
below its lintel. Awnings shall maintain a minimum 7-foot clearance above
the sidewalk. Awnings shall be retractable and made of canvas or other
fabric on a metal frame. Awnings shall not be backlit. Awning colors shall
be compatible with the sign and building colors.” Provide a specification
sheet of the awning material to confirm material.
Attachments: 82 First St. AHBR Packet
D. AHBR 25-133 2732 Middleton Road
Accessory Structure & Alterations (Detached Garage)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing a detached garage, along with
alterations and a small addition to the existing house.
b) Section IV-4(e)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state “The
building shall have a typical window used for most windows.” Staff notes
the proposed window design on the rear and garage side of the existing
house. Question if double hung windows would be more appropriate.
c) Section III-1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Enclosed
accessory buildings shall incorporate some elements similar to the main
body, for example similar corner boards, window types, or materials.”
Question the materials and how they relate to the existing house.
d) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards states
“Replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing
materials.” Question how the wall and foundation materials will blend in
with the existing at the right-side elevation and the door infill on the rear
elevation.
Attachments: 2736 Middleeton Rd AHBR Packet
E. AHBR 25-163 7706 Oxgate Court
Alteration (Siding)
Submitted by Kaitlyn Davis, Campo Roof
a) Section IV-1(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state the
materials used in the main body must be applied consistently on that mass on
all sides of the structure. Staff notes the applicant is proposing board and
batten siding that does not wrap around the entire mass. Revise plans to depict
a more consistent material on all sides of the mass.
Attachments: 7706 Oxgate Ct. AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
F. AHBR 25-170 2425 Hudson Aurora Road
Addition (2nd Story Bed & Bath)
Submitted by Jim Dombroski
a) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards state
replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing
materials. Question how the siding material will blend with the existing on
the west elevation.
b) Suggest the windows on the west elevation shift up to be centered on the
wall.
Attachments: 2425 Hudson Aurora Rd AHBR Packet
G. AHBR 25-178 6575 Dunbarton Drive
Addition (In-law suite)
Submitted by Brian Kuck
a) Section III-1(g)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Exposed
foundations and tie courses shall be of a consistent material on all
elevations.” Confirm exposed foundation will be consistently applied on all
elevations.
Attachments: 6575 Dunbarton AHBR Packet
H. AHBR 25-131 549 West Streetsboro Street
New Construction (Single-family dwelling)
Submitted by Robyn Jones, Prestige Builder Group
a) Section IV-4(b)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “The front
face of the main body must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of
the wings.” Staff notes the two garage wings sit approximately 40 feet
forward of the main body. This design is in direct conflict with the
Architectural Design Standards. Revise plans to depict a more appropriate
design.
b) Section 1205.05(d)(5)(c)(3) of the Land Development Code states “All uses
on lots fronting arterial roads: 100 feet, of which the front fifty feet shall
comprise a bufferyard that shall be landscaped pursuant to Section
1207.04(k).” Staff notes Streetsboro Road (State Route 303) is an arterial
road. The applicant is depicting a 130-foot setback. The adjoining
property to the west has a front setback of 99 feet and the east property is
vacant. Suggest revising site plan to depict a 100-foot setback in order to
better align with the west property. Additionally, revise site plan to depict
landscaping to ensure compliance with bufferyard requirements.
Attachments: 549 W. Streetsboro AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
I. AHBR Preserve of Hudson Townhomes
24-1346 New Residential Construction (29 Unit Townhomes - District 3)
Submitted by Hanna Cohan
a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the May 8, 2024 AHBR meeting. The
applicant is proposing a 29-unit townhome project that is proposed to be
setback 500-feet from Darrow Road and will be accessed via a private
drive.
b) The Board discussed ways the applicant could include different variety
amongst the building units. Different window/door design and
configurations were discussed as well as the color pallet. Staff notes the
applicant depicted a different bay window configuration on the “American
Farmhouse” concept, a different window design on the “Cottage” concept,
and included a railing feature on the “traditional concept”. Additionally,
the applicant implemented different color pallets to further create variety
between the building units and depicts bay windows on the side elevations.
c) Staff notes the units 24-29 is a six-unit building. Revise the design to
incorporate more variety between the units. Submit a color rendering for
the six-unit building.
d) Staff notes the elevations depict siding extending to the ground.
Incorporate exposed block masonry foundation with variety between units
and buildings.
e) Submit specification sheets of proposed siding material. Suggest a
hardi-board or similar.
f) Submit specification sheets for the proposed windows and roofing
materials.
g) Section IV-11(d)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards state “The
materials used on a dwelling unit must be applied consistently on that
dwelling unit on all sides.” Incorporate shutters at the side and rear
elevation typical windows.
h) Label building height.
i) Submit a roof plan.
j) Submit plans for the proposed pavilion.
k) Submit unit typical cross sections to depict the amount of relief and
detailing proposed as dormers, bump outs, roof overhangs and openings.
l) Farmhouse
· Suggest have the front elevation end units adjusted so the massing
does not match each other
· Suggest incorporating another wall material such as smooth
paneling or painted brick
· Suggest revising the second-floor bay window
· Revise the side elevations to incorporate one square window and one
full size window per bedroom to reduce the open space without
openings.
· Incorporate varied porch column designs
· Incorporate additional variety in the bay configuration
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 8 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
· Suggest some relief in the rear elevations. This could be address with
a mix of bump out headers, 1-2ft bump out for garage with shed roof,
small balcony at second floor, and/or bumping out second floor
window with a small shed roof.
m) Cottage
· Suggest a varied dormer design on the front façade
· Suggest the front elevation end units be adjusted so the massing
does not match each other.
· Revise the side elevations so the front façade gables do not clip
or overlap the side elevation.
· Question if shake at the gable ends would soften the large wall
surface at the side elevations.
· Revise the side elevations to incorporate one square window
and one full size window per bedroom to reduce the open space
without openings.
· Suggest some relief in the back elevations. This could be
addressed with a mix of bump out headers, 1-2 ft bump out for
garage with a shed roof, small balcony at the second floor,
and/or bumping out second floor windows with a small shed roof.
· Suggest a reduced side elevation bay design with the paneling
removed and decorative brackets.
n) Traditional
· Suggest the front elevation end units be adjusted so the massing
does not match each other.
· Revise the side elevations so the front facade gables to not clip
or overlap the side elevation.
· Revise the side elevations to incorporate one square window
and one full size window per bedroom to reduce the open space
without openings.
· Suggest some relief in the back elevations. This could be
addressed with a mix of bump out headers, 1-2 ft bump out for
garage with a shed roof, small balcony at the second floor,
and/or bumping out the second-floor window with a small shed
roof.
· Suggest a reduced side elevation bay design with the paneling
removed and decorative brackets.
o) Staff notes the submittal includes a ground sign review.
· Section V-5(c)(3) states “Signs should have a matte finish, not have a
glossy or reflective finish.” Confirm sign will have a matte finish.
· Section V-5(c)(1) states “ Signs should be fabricated on and of
materials that are of permanent quality, good durability and are
complimentary to the building of which they become a part.”
Question how the proposed sign compliments the building.
Attachments: Preserve of Hudson AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 9 Printed on 3/7/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final March 12, 2025
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
2-12-25 February 12, 2025.
Attachments: February 12, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
Legislative History
2/26/25 Architectural & Historic Board postponed to a date certain
of Review
B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
2-26-25 February 26, 2025.
Attachments: February 26, 2025 AHBR Minutes - Draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 10 Printed on 3/7/2025
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.