Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · April 9, 2025
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic Board of Review of
the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section
121.22.
Roll Call
Present: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the Board . There were no
comments.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that the Consent Agenda be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
A. AHBR 25-234 5787 Timberline Trail
Addition (Screen Room)
Attachments: 5787 Timberline Tr. AHBR Packet
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
B. AHBR 25-286 2081 Edgeview Drive
Addition (screened porch)
Attachments: 2081 Edgeview Drive Packet for AHBR
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 9, 2025
This AHBR application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
A. AHBR 24-1346Preserve of Hudson Townhomes
(contd) New Residential Construction (20 Townhome Units - District 3)
Attachments: Elevations - Revised
Elevations - Staff mark up of changes
Elevations - Previous
Presentation - Revised
Sign and Pavilion
Product Specification Sheets
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting revisions were made based on previous Board comments .
Ms. Hanna Cohan, Triban Investments, described how the Cottage style, Farmhouse style, and the Traditional
style designs were revised to give more variety using combinations of: Shake shingles, columns, dormers,
eliminating siding terminations at outside corners, gables, bump-outs, differing window configurations, and wrap
around porches. Ms. Cohan also noted the sign will have a matte finish with the location detailed .
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed the needed shake siding adjustment on Unit 5 - which will be revised
for staff,
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that this AHBR Application
be approved as amended with a matte finish on the sign, and the shake on the Cottage style
siding changed to metal which terminates at an inside corner. The motion carried by the
following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 25-292 82 E Streetsboro St. (Historic District)
Alteration (roof shingle replacement)
Attachments: 82 E Streetsboro AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying and describing the location and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Mike Zelescko noted that six-feet of ice guard will be used according to the standards with the front of the
house having 100 percent ice guard, and that a soffit will be repaired .
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
B. AHBR 25-279 449-499 W Streetsboro St.
Sign (Ground Sign)
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 9, 2025
Attachments: 449 W Streetsboro AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by reviewing the staff comments.
Mr. Chris Brown, representing GBI and Hudson West Condominiums, described : The scope of the work and that
the new sign will go where the existing sign is. The Board questioned why a wooden sign is being used when the
buildings are brick. Mr. Brown noted the wear and tear on the existing brick and his desire to lessen the
maintenance on the sign, and the Hudson West residents who like the proposed design .
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, matching the brick of the building, that the existing brick wall is
beyond repair, that the sign is approximately 100-feet from the closest building, and the style of the proposed
stone is a common element with the buildings.
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application be
approved with the understanding that the brick wall will be removed and the actual materials
are in a brick shape and not random on the sign. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
C. AHBR 25-186 2180 Hudson Aurora Rd.
Addition (Primary Suite & Pergola)
Attachments: 2180 Hudson Aurora Rd. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the application and reviewed the staff comments .
Mr. Quinn Miller, Peninsula Architects, noted the brick will match the size, style and color of the existing brick,
that existing brick may be used following the demolition of one wall, and that the covered grill area does not
have fenestration because it is intended to be a grill area.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, understanding not wanting a window above the grill, the possibility of
a transom window, the possibility of a faux bricked-in window that matches one of the house windows, and the
brick will be blended in with the existing brick.
Ms. Kenney made a motion, seconded by Mr. Workley, that a faux window, which matches the
existing windows, be installed on the elevation that lack appropriate fenestration and the new
or reused bricks be toothed in with the existing bricks. The motion was approved by the
following vote.
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
D. AHBR 25-284 27 College St. (Historic District)
Alteration (Windows)
Attachments: 27 College Street AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the application and reviewed the staff comment .
Mr. Nate Bailey, Hara Architects, described: The proposed window as being similar to the Pella Reserve
window, the clients desire to eventually replace all the windows - which are vinyl, with more appropriate
windows, and that the proposed redesigned windows will match other windows in the house .
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 9, 2025
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
E. AHBR 24-104684 N. Oviatt St. (Historic District)
Alteration (Bay Window)
Attachments: 84 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the elevations, the project, and reviewed the staff comments .
Ms. Jessica Skimin, applicant, noted the siding and shingles will match the existing and that wood windows are
proposed.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, the need for a foundation under the proposed window, the way the
steps will look when sitting under a window, how the siding will be installed, that the foundation was not
discussed with the client, that the proposed window style replacing the French doors is not a historic look, the
detail of the window grids, the need for more detail on the window, and that the proposed plan does not follow
the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines.
The applicant requested the application be continued.
This matter was continued
F. AHBR 25-274 85 Division St. (Historic District)
Alteration (Garage)
Attachments: 85 Division Street Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the application by: Noting the existing garage is a contributing structure
to the historic district, however, a build date has not been determined, that the proposal will alter the roof design,
and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations.
Mr. Jonathan Paul Fleming, Architect, stated wood can be used on the dormer, that the proposed garage is more
consistent with the design of the house, that standing seam roof materials will be used, that the shed dormer and
straight gable are consistent with the house style, that the roof will be changed to match other roofs in the
neighborhood, that the dormer is to allow additional storage and head clearance, that the existing unique batten
siding will be replicated, and that portions of many walls will need to be replaced .
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: That the dormer going to the ridge is not a desirable look but an
understandable desire, whether one or two garage doors should be used, that the redesign may be more appealing
that the existing look, that the gable height will move from 13-feet to 18-feet, that seven windows will be used
across the shed, that the proposed shed will overwhelm the house, that the dormer on the existing house goes to
the peak of the roof, that the dormer will not be very visible from the street, a desire to have a site visit, and that
the footprint of the proposed garage does not change from the existing,
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Mr. Ray, to approve the application noting that the
new siding will have the distinct design as the existing siding. The motion was approved by the
following vote:
Aye: 5 - Mr. Caputo, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko
Nay: 2 - Ms. Kenney and Ms. Marzulla
G. AHBR 25-198 2274 Wellington Cir.
Alterations (Windows)
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 9, 2025
Attachments: 2274 Wellington Cir. AHBR Packet
The applicant was not present for the meeting. The application was not reviewed.
H. AHBR 25-39 7563 Lakedge Ct.
Alterations & Addition (Bedroom & Porch)
Attachments: 7563 Lakedge Ct. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the elevations, the project, and reviewed the staff comments .
Mr. Peter and Ms. Monica Havens, homeowners, stated the materials will all match the existing materials,
described the rounded windows on each side of the fireplace, agreed that a faux window could be installed where
the lack of fenestration is a problem, and that the windows are different colors because of the back windows not
needing to be replaced yet.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: That two different types of windows are not generally approved, the
options for the fenestration or faux fenestration, that the circular windows are not consistent with the rest of the
house or the farmhouse look, and the possibility of using rectangular transom windows instead of the half circle .
Mr. Workley made a motion, seconded by Ms. Kenney, to approve the application with the
following conditions: Change the circular windows to rectangles, the north wall achieve a
window to resolve the fenestration issue, and the windows be of a consistent color around the
house. The motion was approved by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
I. AHBR 25-203 363 Oldham Way
Addition (Sunroom)
Submitted by Robert Cogdeill, Robert’s Remodeling & Construction Co.
a) Revise the roof design to eliminate the triangular glass connection to the
main house.
b) Submit a photo of the rear elevation, straight on the house mass, showing
the entire rear façade.
Attachments: 363 Oldham Way AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the project and reviewed the staff comments .
Mr. Robert Cogdeill, Robert's Remodeling & Construction Co., noted a willingness to remove the triangular
window which will allow a steeper roofline.
A motion was made by Mr. Workley, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that this AHBR Application be
approved as submitted with the removal of the triangular window and the 6 / 12 pitched
roofline. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
J. AHBR 25-32 7593 Lakedge Ct.
Addition (Living Room)
Attachments: 7593 Lakedge Ct. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the application, the project, and reviewing the staff comment .
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 9, 2025
Mr. Samuel Schroeder, applicant, noted the siding to the right of the chimney will be replaced and it will match
the existing siding.
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR Application be
approved with the siding going to the chimney. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
K. AHBR 24-12077738 Oxgate Ct.
Addition (Screened Porch)
Attachments: 7738 Oxgate Court AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the application by displaying the elevations and reviewing the staff
comments.
Mr. Dan Testa, Pence Bros, stated the siding on the left elevation will be removed and replaced with new from
top to bottom, on the opposite side new siding will match the existing siding, and the shingles will match the
existing.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, the new deck which will match the old deck and the 18-inch knee wall
which will have siding to match the house.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
L. AHBR 25-238 1980 Christine Drive
New Construction (Single-Family Dwelling)
Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders
a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the April 9th AHBR meeting.
b) The Board requested the applicant revise the plans to depict the walk-in
closet wing be behind the main mass or be a projection of maximum of 5
feet. The applicant did revise plans to show the 5-foot projection.
c) The Board also requested the applicant explore aligning the windows on
the left elevation as this side is in the public view. The applicant did
submit revised plan depicting this change.
d) Question how the front windows will meet the porch roof.
Attachments: 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet 4.23 Meeting
1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described the application and reviewed the staff comments and recommendations .
Mr. Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders, discussed the 18-inch projection. Mr. Lunardi questioned if the house could be
reviewed as an "L" shaped house, staff described why this is not an "L" shaped design . Discussion also too place
regarding that the house projects 8-feet from the main mass, while only a 5-foot projection is allowable, and that
if the walls are adjusted a column will be needed.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, that if the wall adjustments are redrawn, the Board will want to review
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 9, 2025
the application, that the hip roof is driven by the porch style, that the window pattern be redesigned, and the rear
windows trim be made wider.
The application was continued.
This matter was continued
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR 7538 41 E Main St. (Informal - Historic District)
Addition
Attachments: 41 E Main AHBR Packet - Informal
Preservation Brief #14 - Additions
Ms. Krickovich displayed and described photos of the proposed application .
Mr. Joseph Matava, Peninsula Architects, described the project, noted the location is setback 5-feet from the
existing building, and the proposed materials.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed, the use of the connector, that the addition overwhelms the main
building, that water management is being discussed with the City, that the setbacks will require variances, that the
neighbors have been contacted with a landscaping plan, that the addition may detract from the main building, that
the gable ends may need to be reduced, that the addition should be differentiated from the original building, a
preference that the windows be closer in design to the original, that the garage door have more of a carriage
house look, that the south elevation mirrors the north elevation, that the transom window style on the original
building be used on the proposed addition, that the arched eyebrow window may not be needed, and that the
proposed addition be made to look more like a carriage house.
This matter was discussed
B. AHBR 3-12-25 Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting:
March 12, 2025
Attachments: March 12, 2025 AHBR Meeting Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Mr. Workley, that this Minutes be approved.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 7 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Mr. Workley, Ms.
Sredinski and Ms. Manko
VIII. Staff Update
Mr. Sugar informed the Board that no requirements can be found for AHBR submittals and requested permission
for staff to begin developing a draft for AHBR's consideration.
.
This matter was discussed
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Manko, that the meeting be adjourned
at 9:34 p.m... The motion carried by an unanimous vote.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 9, 2025
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
John Workley, Secretary
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written summary of the meeting
minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes shall also consist of a permanent audio and
video recording, excluding executive sessions, in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252 .04, Minutes
of Architectural and Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning
Commission.
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 8
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, April 9, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 25-234 5787 Timberline Trail
Addition (Screen Room)
Submitted by Stephen Cochran, Cochran’s Remodeling & Construction LLC.
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 5787 Timberline Tr. AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 25-286 2081 Edgeview Drive
Addition (screened porch)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted
Attachments: 2081 Edgeview Drive Packet for AHBR
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 4/8/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 9, 2025
A. AHBR Preserve of Hudson Townhomes
24-1346 New Residential Construction (20 Townhome Units - District 3)
(contd) Submitted by Hanna Cohan, Knez Homes
a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the May 8, 2024 and April 9, 2025
meetings.
b) The applicant has submitted revisions based on previous board
discussions. Revisions include additional variety in dormer design, porch
post design, gable end design, and front projection design.
c) Staff has compiled the attached redline revisions documenting the
observed changes; however, the applicant should present all changes to
the board.
d) Revise elevations to label exposed foundation material.
e) Question the proposed porch width and if it is functional.
f) Question if the shake siding along of lot 5 terminates at an inside corner
along the left elevation.
g) Submit the sign plan on a surveyed site plan. Staff notes the property
boundary along Darrow Road is inaccurately depicted on the submitted
sign plan.
Attachments: Elevations - Revised
Elevations - Staff mark up of changes
Elevations - Previous
Presentation - Revised
Sign and Pavilion
Product Specification Sheets
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 25-292 82 E Streetsboro St. (Historic District)
Alteration (roof shingle replacement)
Submitted by Bill Buehl, A & B Roofing
a) Staff notes low sloped additions on the house. Question the current roof
material on these low sloped areas and if replacement is proposed.
Attachments: 82 E Streetsboro AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 4/8/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 9, 2025
B. AHBR 25-279 449-499 W Streetsboro St.
Sign (Ground Sign)
Submitted by Chris Brown
a) Section V-3(b)(1) states “Ground signs should be designed to relate to and
share common design elements with the building and the sign(s) attached
to the building.” Suggest the signpost be brick with a color to match the
building and the base to be stone.
b) Section V-3(b)(2) states “Whenever a building is located 30 feet or more
from the street, its ground sign should be placed on a solid base.” Staff
notes the proposed sign would have a masonry post and a hanging sign
face; however, similar sign styles have been approved.
c) Section V-3(b)(3) states “Approved year-round landscaping shall be used
around the base of the sign to screen lighting fixtures and sources in
compliance with the Land Development Code.” Question if the existing
landscaping would remain.
Attachments: 449 W Streetsboro AHBR Packet
C. AHBR 25-186 2180 Hudson Aurora Rd.
Addition (Primary Suite & Pergola)
Submitted by Quinn Miller, Peninsula Architects
a) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards state
“Replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing
materials.” Question how the existing brick will tie into the new brick on
the right side elevation.
b) Section III-1(g)(8) states “Large expanses of blank wall are to be avoided.
Fenestration placement should be at a maximum of approximately every 12
feet.” Staff notes the north elevation would have a wall expanse of 14 feet
without fenestration.
c) Submit photos of all 4 sides of the existing house to verify material relates
to the proposed addition.
Attachments: 2180 Hudson Aurora Rd. AHBR Packet
D. AHBR 25-284 27 College St. (Historic District)
Alteration (Windows)
Submitted by Nate Bailey, Hara Architects
a) The application proposes replacing the existing vinyl windows with a
wood, aluminum clad window. One window is proposed to be redesigned
on the south elevation facing Church Street.
b) Staff notes the proposed windows would be Marvin Ultimate while the
previously approved addition proposed Pella Reserve Tradition. Question
if all the windows would be consistent. Both window types were wood,
aluminum clad.
Attachments: 27 College Street AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 4/8/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 9, 2025
E. AHBR 84 N. Oviatt St. (Historic District)
24-1046 Alteration (Bay Window)
Submitted by Jessica Skimin
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to remove a door and replace with a
bay window.
b) Staff notes the Architectural Design Standards categorize bay windows as
projections. Section IV-4(g)(4) of the Architectural Design Standards state
Projections on the ground floor should be carried through to the
foundation. Verify the distance the bay window would project from the
house.
c) Appendix 1 of the Secretary of Interior Standards state new additions,
exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic
materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be
differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size,
scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the
property and its environment. Question the proposed window and shingle
material and how they will relate to the existing house. Additionally,
question how the existing siding will be removed to accommodate the
proposal.
d) Submit a clearer and more detailed photo of the existing door that is
proposed to be removed.
e) Question if the existing steps will remain once the door is removed.
Attachments: 84 N. Oviatt AHBR Packet
F. AHBR 25-274 85 Division St. (Historic District)
Alteration (Garage)
Submitted by Jonathan Paul Fleming, Architect
a) Staff notes the existing garage is a contributing structure to the historic
district; however, an exact date has not been determined.
b) Staff notes the proposal would alter the roof design to center the gable at
the garage door.
c) Staff suggests reducing the prominence of the proposed dormer by
lowering it so it does not tie into the ridge and reducing the overall width.
d) Staff suggests wood siding be utilized in lieu of hardi-board as the dormer
would not be a separate mass.
e) Verify if the existing would siding would be replaced. The Secretary of
Interior Standards state “Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired
rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires
replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in
design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible,
materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by
documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.”
f) Question the proposed garage door design and the elimination of separate
garage doors.
Attachments: 85 Division Street Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 4/8/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 9, 2025
G. AHBR 25-198 2274 Wellington Cir.
Alterations (Windows)
Submitted by Jason Glockner, Allstar Home Services
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to replace the windows for a like
material.
b) Section IV-4(f)(w) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Details in
a wing must be consistently applied throughout all sides of the wing.” Staff
notes the applicant is proposing to remove the existing window headers on
three of the windows on the rear.
Attachments: 2274 Wellington Cir. AHBR Packet
H. AHBR 25-39 7563 Lakedge Ct.
Alterations & Addition (Bedroom & Porch)
Submitted by Peter Havens
a) Staff notes the scope of work includes a full siding, roof and window
replacement, a rear first floor addition, and a porch addition.
b) Section IV-4(d)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states “The
materials used in any mass must be applied consistently on that mass on
all sides of the structure.” Question the rounded window design on the
south elevation.
c) Section III-1(g)(8) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Large
expanses of blank wall are to be avoided. Fenestration placement should
be at a maximum of approximately every 12 feet.” Staff notes the
approximate 15-foot wall expansion on the north elevation. Revise to
rearrange to depict 12 feet or less expansion or add in a window or door
to meet fenestration requirements.
d) Question if the windows on the frontage elevation are proposed to be black
and the other windows white as depicted on the drawings.
Attachments: 7563 Lakedge Ct. AHBR Packet
I. AHBR 25-203 363 Oldham Way
Addition (Sunroom)
Submitted by Robert Cogdeill, Robert’s Remodeling & Construction Co.
a) Revise the roof design to eliminate the triangular glass connection to the
main house.
b) Submit a photo of the rear elevation, straight on the house mass, showing
the entire rear façade.
Attachments: 363 Oldham Way AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5 Printed on 4/8/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 9, 2025
J. AHBR 25-32 7593 Lakedge Ct.
Addition (Living Room)
Submitted by Samuel Schroeder
a) Section III-1(g)(11) of the Architectural Design Standards states
“Replacement wall and roof materials should be blended across a facade
(rather than small patch areas) to ensure compatibility with existing
materials.” Confirm how the new siding will blend in with the existing on the
right elevation. Suggest insetting the addition or replacing the siding to the
right of the chimney to meet this requirement.
Attachments: 7593 Lakedge Ct. AHBR Packet
K. AHBR 7738 Oxgate Ct.
24-1207 Addition (Screened Porch)
Submitted by Dan Testa, Pence Bros
a) Section III-1(g)(11) states “Replacement wall and roof materials should be
blended across a façade (rather than small patch areas) to ensure
compatibility with existing materials”. Staff notes the proposed screen room
would extend an existing projection. Question how the new siding would be
blended with existing. Suggest the roof be lowered and the screen room inset
to meet this requirement. Suggest a board or azek material be utilized in lieu
of siding.
Attachments: 7738 Oxgate Court AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 6 Printed on 4/8/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 9, 2025
L. AHBR 25-238 1980 Christine Dr.
New Construction (Single-Family Dwelling)
Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders Inc.
a) Section IV-4(b)(2) of the Architectural Design Standards states “The front
face of the main body must sit forward at least 18" from the front face of
the wings.” Staff notes the walk-in closet and bedroom are proposed to be
8 feet in front of the main body. Revise plans to comply with this
regulation.
b) Section IV-4(g)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Roofs on
projections should match the roof material of the building (unless both
roofs are flat) and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof.” Staff
notes the applicant is proposing a hip roof on the open porch projection on
the front elevation. Question if this should be a gable roof to match the
main body.
c) Section IV-4(e)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Doors
and windows on the public faces of a building should be arranged so that
they are regulated by a system of (invisible) parallel and perpendicular
lines.” Question if the window openings on the left elevation could be
arranged to meet this regulation.
d) Section IV-(e)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards states “The
materials used in any mass must be applied consistently on that mass on
all sides of the structure.” Confirm the material on the porch inset wraps
around to an inside corner.
e) Question the window placement on the rear and front elevations and how
they intersect with corner boards and roofs. Suggest utilizing wider trim
so there would not be a small band of siding between the windows and the
first floor roof.
Attachments: 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 7 Printed on 4/8/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 9, 2025
A. AHBR 7538 41 E Main St. (Informal - Historic District)
Addition
Submitted by Joe Matava, Peninsula Architects
a) Staff notes the addition would serve functions of the dentistry.
b) The applicant would request a variance to the southern property line in
order to step the addition back 5 ft from the Division Street property line.
c) The AHBR should reference The Secretary of Interior Standards
Preservation Brief #14: New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings for
the review.
d) Staff notes the proposed one story recessed connection would align with
the Preservation Brief’s recommendations.
e) The overall massing would align with the Preservation Brief’s
recommendation for additions to be subordinate in size than the main
building.
f) The Preservation Brief states the new addition should be subordinate in
design that the main building. Suggest removing the proposed gable on
the north elevation facing Division Street and redesigning the rounded
window to a simpler design. Staff notes the main building has a simple roof
design with no special window designs.
g) The Preservation Brief states additions should be as inconspicuous as
possible from the public view. Staff notes, while the addition would be
located along a street frontage, it would be a secondary frontage. The
design would also provide a 5 ft setback from the sidewalk, while the
existing building is directly adjacent to the sidewalk. Staff requests AHBR
feedback on the building’s relationship to Division Street to aid in the
review of the anticipated setback variance.
h) Verify the proposed exterior materials for roof, siding, windows, and
foundation.
Attachments: 41 E Main AHBR Packet - Informal
Preservation Brief #14 - Additions
B. AHBR Minutes of Previous Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting: March
3-12-25 12, 2025
Attachments: March 12, 2025 AHBR Meeting Minutes - Draft
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 8 Printed on 4/8/2025
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.