Architectural & Historic Board of Review
Regular MeetingHudson, OH · April 23, 2025
Minutes
City of Hudson, Ohio
Meeting Minutes - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, April 23, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic Board of Review of
the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section
121.22.
II. Roll Call
Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
Absent: 1 - Mr. Workley
III. Public Comment
Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the Board . There were no
comments.
IV. Consent Applications
A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that the Consent Agenda be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
A. AHBR 25-354 72 Village Way
Alteration (Siding, Doors, Windows)
Attachments: 72 Village Way AHBR Packet
This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
B. AHBR 25-301 7490 Andover Way
Addition (In-law Suite)
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025
Attachments: 7490 Andover Way AHBR Packet
This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
C. AHBR 25-153 7534 S. Vinemont Ct.
Accessory Structure (Pavillion)
Attachments: 7534 S. Vinemont AHBR Packet
This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda.
V. Old Business
A. AHBR 25-238 1980 Christine Drive
New Construction (Single-Family Dwelling)
Attachments: 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet 4.23 Meeting
1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting the project was discussed at the April 9 , 2025 meeting, and
reviewed the Board's and staff comments.
Mr. Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders, stated the new window are regular double hung window, that all the windows
have four-inch aluminum trim, and the windows above the porch are close to the porch roof line because of the
slope of the roof and the size of the windows.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 25-280 219 N. Main Street (Denim & Design)
Sign (Building)
Attachments: 219 N. Main Street AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the business, describing the sign, and
reviewing the staff comments.
Ms. Marianne Minogue, applicant, verified the panel is a metal composite material with flush writing and a matte
finish.
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed an aluminum sign not fitting with the house even though the previous
business used the same sign material, and that the proposed sign does meet the elements of the LDC .
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
B. AHBR 25-331 13 S. Oviatt St. (Historic District)
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025
Alteration (Roof Replacement)
Attachments: 13 S. Oviatt AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying a photo of the roof and reviewing the staff comments .
Mr. Bill Buehl, applicant, was present for the meeting.
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application be
approved. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
C. AHBR 25-368 55 N Oviatt (Historic District)
Addition (Enclosure of Existing Porch)
Submitted by Chris Lachman, CSL Consulting
a) Staff notes the AHBR held a site visit on April 29, 2025.
b) Staff recommends the AHBR review the submitted material and
observations from the site visit to determine if the proposal is appropriate.
Attachments: 55 N. Ovatt AHBR Packet
Preservation Briefs on Wood Porches
55 N Oviatt Packet for AHBR 5.14.25
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the house, describing the project, and
reviewing the staff comments and recommendations including the location of the proposed enclosed porch .
Mr. Chris Lachman, CSL Consulting, and Mr. Rick Brown, architect, noted the porch presently has sliding glass
doors and this project will enlarge the size of the porch. Mr. Brown reviewed: The history of the house, the
owners love and care for the historic character of the house, the various additions to the house, and this proposed
addition which attempts to be consistent with the existing house. Mr. Lachman stated the proposed Pella door as
disappearing when opened because the handles can be removed .
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: The material cut sheets which will be sent to staff, that the proposal is
a large change to the house in the historic district, how the door will function, that according to code a railing
will not be needed, the type and style of the siding and trim above the windows and that the vertical siding
introduces a new element to the design, that the natural vegetation screening effectively blocks the view of the
addition, and the possibility of using larger windows, or a flat panel at the top .
The Board decided to conduct a site visit.
This matter was continued
D. AHBR 25-353 7487 Darrow Road
Addition (Enclosed Porch)
Attachments: 7487 Darrow Rd. AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting: The unusual lot, that the standards describes this as a wing,
and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations.
Mr. Robert Duber, homeowner, was present for the meeting.
The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: That the front door of the house faces Darrow Road, the large garage,
that the applicant feels the proposed addition is more appealing than the existing screened area, that screens are
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025
the side walls (which was not apparent to the Board or staff prior to this discussion), that the addition could be
free standing, that shed roofs have been permitted in the past, and the size and height of the proposed addition .
A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR Application be
approved as submitted with the stipulation that it is all screened. The motion carried by the
following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
E. AHBR 25-152 148 West Prospect
Addition & Alteration
Attachments: 148 W. Prospect AHBR Packet
Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying elevations, and photos of the house and project,
describing the project and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations .
Mr. Lyle Miller, project manager, and Mike Ever, Kline Home Exteriors, were present for the meeting .
The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: The screened room being framed on a concrete slap, and that one
window will be added on the front side of the house near the chimney. Mr. Miller and the Board then: Described
changing to the structure, stated that the stone skirting around the house will all be the same height, noted a
drawing error is responsible for showing stone around the screen addition, that the front porch overhang is metal,
that typical windows in style and grid pattern are required by the LDC, that some of the specification sheets need
to be supplied, the type of Hardi-Board that will be used will be tongue-and-groove, and the dimensions of the
screen with an aluminum single cross piece.
Ms. Kenney made a motion, seconded by Mr Ray, to approve with the following conditions: A
specification sheet be submitted on the Hardi-Board, the grid pattern of the front windows
match the typical house window, the stone foundation maintain the same elevation around the
house, and the screened addition frame plan be submitted. The motion was approved by the
following vote:
Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms.
Manko
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR- Submittal
Discussion of Planning Commission Subcommittee - Review of Appendix A -
Requirements Submittal Requirements
Attachments: Staff Memo - PC subcommittee - AHBR Submittal Requirements
The Board discussed adding an area on the form regarding the fenestration twelve-foot rule, and an area for an
explanation if the rule is exceeded; that at present there are no codified application requirements for a completed
submittal, and that the requirement for photos of all four sides of the structure be clarified .
VIII. Staff Update
Ms. Krickovich explained the minutes were excluded from the agenda by mistake, and that she has resigned from
her position and this will be her last meeting at AHBR.
IX. Adjournment
A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that the meeting be adjourned
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4
Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025
at 8:42 p.m.. The motion carried by an unanimous vote.
___________________________________________
John Caputo, Chair
___________________________________________
Allyn Marzula, Vice Chair
___________________________________________
Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant
Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written summary of the meeting
minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes shall also consist of a permanent audio and
video recording, excluding executive sessions, in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252 .04, Minutes
of Architectural and Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning
Commission.
* * *
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5
Agenda
City of Hudson, Ohio
CD Meeting Agenda - Final
Architectural & Historic Board of Review
John Caputo, Chair
Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair
John Workley, Secretary
Amy Manko
Françoise Massardier-Kenney
William Ray
Jamie Sredinski
Nicholas Sugar, City Planner
Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner
Wednesday, April 23, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall
27 East Main Street
I. Call To Order
II. Roll Call
III. Public Comment
IV. Consent Applications
A. AHBR 25-354 72 Village Way
Alteration (Siding, Doors, Windows)
Submitted by Cecilia McDermott
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 72 Village Way AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 25-301 7490 Andover Way
Addition (In-law Suite)
Submitted by Mark Collins
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 7490 Andover Way AHBR Packet
C. AHBR 25-153 7534 S. Vinemont Ct.
Accessory Structure (Pavillion)
Submitted by Schott Dohner
a) Staff recommends approval as submitted.
Attachments: 7534 S. Vinemont AHBR Packet
V. Old Business
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 4/18/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 23, 2025
A. AHBR 25-238 1980 Christine Drive
New Construction (Single-Family Dwelling)
Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders
a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the April 9th AHBR meeting.
b) The Board requested the applicant revise the plans to depict the walk-in
closet wing be behind the main mass or be a projection of maximum of 5
feet. The applicant did revise plans to show the 5-foot projection.
c) The Board also requested the applicant explore aligning the windows on
the left elevation as this side is in the public view. The applicant did submit
revised plan depicting this change.
d) Question how the front windows will meet the porch roof.
Attachments: 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet 4.23 Meeting
1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet
Legislative History
4/9/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued
of Review
VI. New Business
A. AHBR 25-280 219 N. Main Street (Denim & Design)
Sign (Building)
Submitted by Marianne Minogue
a) Section V-4(a) of the Architectural Desing Standards state “The lettering
within a sign panel should not exceed approximately 70 % of the height
and length of the sign panel” Reduce the size of the lettering within the
sign panel to provide additional space to meet this requirement.
b) Section V-5(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Signs should
be fabricated on and of materials that are of permanent quality, good
durability and are complimentary to the building of which they become a
part.” Question the use of a metal panel is appropriate as this location is
within the Historic District.
c) Question if the sign is accurately depicted on the drawing.
Attachments: 219 N. Main Street AHBR Packet
B. AHBR 25-331 13 S. Oviatt St. (Historic District)
Alteration (Roof Replacement)
Submitted by Bill Buehl
a) The applicant is requesting to replace a portion of the shingled roof area
with like shingles and replace the low slope roof areas with a self-adhered
membrane.
b) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to use a dimensional shingle on one
slope side while the existing 3-tab would remain on the other sloped side of
the roof pitch. Question the use of two different styles on the same roof.
Attachments: 13 S. Oviatt AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 4/18/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 23, 2025
C. AHBR 25-368 55 N. Ovaitt (Historic District)
Addition (Enclosure of existing porch)
Submitted by Chris Lachman, CSL Consulting
a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to enclose with windows the existing
open porch on the N. Oviatt side of the house.
b) The Preservation Briefs speaks on historic porches and states “If a porch
enclosure is being considered, its significance and location - as well as the
nature of the planned enclosure - play key roles in whether it can be done
without changing the porch’s and building’s historic character. While it is
almost never appropriate to enclose a front porch on a historic building to
create interior space, enclosing a less prominent porch on a less visible
elevation could have less impact.” Staff notes this porch is on an addition
that was put on in the 90’s; however, question the design and if it is
appropriate for a visible porch in the Historic District.
c) Submit specification cut sheets on the windows, doors, and siding detail.
d) Question the aesthetics of the porch when the windows are open.
e) Staff suggests the AHBR take this meeting to understand the project, ask
questions, set up a site visit and request assistance from the Historic
Consultant.
Attachments: 55 N. Ovatt AHBR Packet
Preservation Briefs on Wood Porches
D. AHBR 25-353 7487 Darrow Road
Addition (Enclosed Porch)
Submitted by Robert Duber
a) Section IV-4(h)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state “An
additional wing may be added to any mass of the building. This wing must
be attached at the rear or side of the building and may not extend forward
of the main body.” Staff notes this wing would be projecting from the front
façade facing Middleton Road. Revise plans to depict the proposal on the
side or rear of the house.
b) Section IV-4(h)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Additions
should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by
incorporating materials and a foundation to match.” Staff notes the
proposed materials would not be compatible with the main house.
c) Section IV-4(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state “All roofs in
all the wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may
have a different pitch or orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as
to cause a valley.” The proposal has a shed roof while the existing has a
gable roof.
Attachments: 7487 Darrow Rd. AHBR Packet
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 4/18/2025
Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 23, 2025
E. AHBR 25-152 148 West Prospect
Addition & Alteration
Submitted by Kline Home Exteriors
a) Section IV-4(g) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Roofs on
projections should match the roof material of the building (unless both
roofs are flat) and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof.
Natural finish metals such as copper, terne coated steel, or lead may be
substituted for any roofing material.” And “Materials used on an open
porch or screen room need not be the same as other materials in the
structure, but should be related to materials used in the details of the
structure.” Staff notes the proposal depicts a metal roof while the main
house is shingled.
b) Question how the proposed screens on the rear porch will tie into the
ground
c) Confirm all window openings will remain and no new opening are
proposed.
d) Question the proposed exposed foundation and if it is consistently applied
on all elevations.
e) Submit specification sheets of the proposed hardi-board siding and
exposed foundation material.
Attachments: 148 W. Prospect AHBR Packet
VII. Other Business
A. AHBR- Discussion of Planning Commission Subcommittee - Review of Appendix A -
Submittal Submittal Requirements
Requirements
Attachments: Staff Memo - PC subcommittee - AHBR Submittal Requirements
VIII. Staff Update
IX. Adjournment
* * *
The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner,
an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a
vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service.
City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 4/18/2025
Get email alerts for Hudson
A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.