Muyni
← Back to Hudson

Architectural & Historic Board of Review

Regular Meeting

Hudson, OH · April 23, 2025

AgendaMinutes

Minutes

City of Hudson, Ohio Meeting Minutes - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary Amy Manko Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Jamie Sredinski Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, April 23, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order Chair Caputo called to order the regularly scheduled meeting of the Architectural & Historic Board of Review of the City of Hudson at 7:30 p.m., in accordance with the Sunshine Laws of the State of Ohio, O.R.C. Section 121.22. II. Roll Call Present: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko Absent: 1 - Mr. Workley III. Public Comment Chair Caputo opened the meeting to public comments for anyone wanting to address the Board . There were no comments. IV. Consent Applications A motion was made by Ms. Marzulla, seconded by Ms. Kenney, that the Consent Agenda be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko A. AHBR 25-354 72 Village Way Alteration (Siding, Doors, Windows) Attachments: 72 Village Way AHBR Packet This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda. B. AHBR 25-301 7490 Andover Way Addition (In-law Suite) City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025 Attachments: 7490 Andover Way AHBR Packet This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda. C. AHBR 25-153 7534 S. Vinemont Ct. Accessory Structure (Pavillion) Attachments: 7534 S. Vinemont AHBR Packet This AHBR Application was approved on the Consent Agenda. V. Old Business A. AHBR 25-238 1980 Christine Drive New Construction (Single-Family Dwelling) Attachments: 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet 4.23 Meeting 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting the project was discussed at the April 9 , 2025 meeting, and reviewed the Board's and staff comments. Mr. Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders, stated the new window are regular double hung window, that all the windows have four-inch aluminum trim, and the windows above the porch are close to the porch roof line because of the slope of the roof and the size of the windows. A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko VI. New Business A. AHBR 25-280 219 N. Main Street (Denim & Design) Sign (Building) Attachments: 219 N. Main Street AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the business, describing the sign, and reviewing the staff comments. Ms. Marianne Minogue, applicant, verified the panel is a metal composite material with flush writing and a matte finish. The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed an aluminum sign not fitting with the house even though the previous business used the same sign material, and that the proposed sign does meet the elements of the LDC . A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that this AHBR Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko B. AHBR 25-331 13 S. Oviatt St. (Historic District) City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025 Alteration (Roof Replacement) Attachments: 13 S. Oviatt AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying a photo of the roof and reviewing the staff comments . Mr. Bill Buehl, applicant, was present for the meeting. A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Mr. Ray, that this AHBR Application be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko C. AHBR 25-368 55 N Oviatt (Historic District) Addition (Enclosure of Existing Porch) Submitted by Chris Lachman, CSL Consulting a) Staff notes the AHBR held a site visit on April 29, 2025. b) Staff recommends the AHBR review the submitted material and observations from the site visit to determine if the proposal is appropriate. Attachments: 55 N. Ovatt AHBR Packet Preservation Briefs on Wood Porches 55 N Oviatt Packet for AHBR 5.14.25 Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying photos of the house, describing the project, and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations including the location of the proposed enclosed porch . Mr. Chris Lachman, CSL Consulting, and Mr. Rick Brown, architect, noted the porch presently has sliding glass doors and this project will enlarge the size of the porch. Mr. Brown reviewed: The history of the house, the owners love and care for the historic character of the house, the various additions to the house, and this proposed addition which attempts to be consistent with the existing house. Mr. Lachman stated the proposed Pella door as disappearing when opened because the handles can be removed . The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: The material cut sheets which will be sent to staff, that the proposal is a large change to the house in the historic district, how the door will function, that according to code a railing will not be needed, the type and style of the siding and trim above the windows and that the vertical siding introduces a new element to the design, that the natural vegetation screening effectively blocks the view of the addition, and the possibility of using larger windows, or a flat panel at the top . The Board decided to conduct a site visit. This matter was continued D. AHBR 25-353 7487 Darrow Road Addition (Enclosed Porch) Attachments: 7487 Darrow Rd. AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by noting: The unusual lot, that the standards describes this as a wing, and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations. Mr. Robert Duber, homeowner, was present for the meeting. The Board, applicant, and staff discussed: That the front door of the house faces Darrow Road, the large garage, that the applicant feels the proposed addition is more appealing than the existing screened area, that screens are City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025 the side walls (which was not apparent to the Board or staff prior to this discussion), that the addition could be free standing, that shed roofs have been permitted in the past, and the size and height of the proposed addition . A motion was made by Mr. Ray, seconded by Ms. Marzulla, that this AHBR Application be approved as submitted with the stipulation that it is all screened. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko E. AHBR 25-152 148 West Prospect Addition & Alteration Attachments: 148 W. Prospect AHBR Packet Ms. Krickovich introduced the application by displaying elevations, and photos of the house and project, describing the project and reviewing the staff comments and recommendations . Mr. Lyle Miller, project manager, and Mike Ever, Kline Home Exteriors, were present for the meeting . The Board, applicant, and staff, discussed: The screened room being framed on a concrete slap, and that one window will be added on the front side of the house near the chimney. Mr. Miller and the Board then: Described changing to the structure, stated that the stone skirting around the house will all be the same height, noted a drawing error is responsible for showing stone around the screen addition, that the front porch overhang is metal, that typical windows in style and grid pattern are required by the LDC, that some of the specification sheets need to be supplied, the type of Hardi-Board that will be used will be tongue-and-groove, and the dimensions of the screen with an aluminum single cross piece. Ms. Kenney made a motion, seconded by Mr Ray, to approve with the following conditions: A specification sheet be submitted on the Hardi-Board, the grid pattern of the front windows match the typical house window, the stone foundation maintain the same elevation around the house, and the screened addition frame plan be submitted. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: 6 - Mr. Caputo, Ms. Kenney, Ms. Marzulla, Mr. Ray, Ms. Sredinski and Ms. Manko VII. Other Business A. AHBR- Submittal Discussion of Planning Commission Subcommittee - Review of Appendix A - Requirements Submittal Requirements Attachments: Staff Memo - PC subcommittee - AHBR Submittal Requirements The Board discussed adding an area on the form regarding the fenestration twelve-foot rule, and an area for an explanation if the rule is exceeded; that at present there are no codified application requirements for a completed submittal, and that the requirement for photos of all four sides of the structure be clarified . VIII. Staff Update Ms. Krickovich explained the minutes were excluded from the agenda by mistake, and that she has resigned from her position and this will be her last meeting at AHBR. IX. Adjournment A motion was made by Ms. Kenney, seconded by Ms. Sredinski, that the meeting be adjourned City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Architectural & Historic Board of Review Meeting Minutes - Final April 23, 2025 at 8:42 p.m.. The motion carried by an unanimous vote. ___________________________________________ John Caputo, Chair ___________________________________________ Allyn Marzula, Vice Chair ___________________________________________ Joe Campbell, Executive Assistant Upon approval by the Architectural & Historic Board of Review, this official written summary of the meeting minutes shall become a permanent record, and the official minutes shall also consist of a permanent audio and video recording, excluding executive sessions, in accordance with Codified Ordinances, Section 252 .04, Minutes of Architectural and Historic Board of Review, Board of Zoning and Building Appeals, and Planning Commission. * * * City of Hudson, Ohio Page 5

Agenda

City of Hudson, Ohio CD Meeting Agenda - Final Architectural & Historic Board of Review John Caputo, Chair Allyn Marzulla, Vice Chair John Workley, Secretary Amy Manko Françoise Massardier-Kenney William Ray Jamie Sredinski Nicholas Sugar, City Planner Amanda Krickovich, Associate Planner Wednesday, April 23, 2025 7:30 PM Town Hall 27 East Main Street I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Public Comment IV. Consent Applications A. AHBR 25-354 72 Village Way Alteration (Siding, Doors, Windows) Submitted by Cecilia McDermott a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 72 Village Way AHBR Packet B. AHBR 25-301 7490 Andover Way Addition (In-law Suite) Submitted by Mark Collins a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 7490 Andover Way AHBR Packet C. AHBR 25-153 7534 S. Vinemont Ct. Accessory Structure (Pavillion) Submitted by Schott Dohner a) Staff recommends approval as submitted. Attachments: 7534 S. Vinemont AHBR Packet V. Old Business City of Hudson, Ohio Page 1 Printed on 4/18/2025 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 23, 2025 A. AHBR 25-238 1980 Christine Drive New Construction (Single-Family Dwelling) Submitted by Tony Lunardi, LDA Builders a) Staff notes this case was reviewed at the April 9th AHBR meeting. b) The Board requested the applicant revise the plans to depict the walk-in closet wing be behind the main mass or be a projection of maximum of 5 feet. The applicant did revise plans to show the 5-foot projection. c) The Board also requested the applicant explore aligning the windows on the left elevation as this side is in the public view. The applicant did submit revised plan depicting this change. d) Question how the front windows will meet the porch roof. Attachments: 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet 4.23 Meeting 1980 Christine Dr. AHBR Packet Legislative History 4/9/25 Architectural & Historic Board continued of Review VI. New Business A. AHBR 25-280 219 N. Main Street (Denim & Design) Sign (Building) Submitted by Marianne Minogue a) Section V-4(a) of the Architectural Desing Standards state “The lettering within a sign panel should not exceed approximately 70 % of the height and length of the sign panel” Reduce the size of the lettering within the sign panel to provide additional space to meet this requirement. b) Section V-5(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Signs should be fabricated on and of materials that are of permanent quality, good durability and are complimentary to the building of which they become a part.” Question the use of a metal panel is appropriate as this location is within the Historic District. c) Question if the sign is accurately depicted on the drawing. Attachments: 219 N. Main Street AHBR Packet B. AHBR 25-331 13 S. Oviatt St. (Historic District) Alteration (Roof Replacement) Submitted by Bill Buehl a) The applicant is requesting to replace a portion of the shingled roof area with like shingles and replace the low slope roof areas with a self-adhered membrane. b) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to use a dimensional shingle on one slope side while the existing 3-tab would remain on the other sloped side of the roof pitch. Question the use of two different styles on the same roof. Attachments: 13 S. Oviatt AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 2 Printed on 4/18/2025 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 23, 2025 C. AHBR 25-368 55 N. Ovaitt (Historic District) Addition (Enclosure of existing porch) Submitted by Chris Lachman, CSL Consulting a) Staff notes the applicant is proposing to enclose with windows the existing open porch on the N. Oviatt side of the house. b) The Preservation Briefs speaks on historic porches and states “If a porch enclosure is being considered, its significance and location - as well as the nature of the planned enclosure - play key roles in whether it can be done without changing the porch’s and building’s historic character. While it is almost never appropriate to enclose a front porch on a historic building to create interior space, enclosing a less prominent porch on a less visible elevation could have less impact.” Staff notes this porch is on an addition that was put on in the 90’s; however, question the design and if it is appropriate for a visible porch in the Historic District. c) Submit specification cut sheets on the windows, doors, and siding detail. d) Question the aesthetics of the porch when the windows are open. e) Staff suggests the AHBR take this meeting to understand the project, ask questions, set up a site visit and request assistance from the Historic Consultant. Attachments: 55 N. Ovatt AHBR Packet Preservation Briefs on Wood Porches D. AHBR 25-353 7487 Darrow Road Addition (Enclosed Porch) Submitted by Robert Duber a) Section IV-4(h)(1) of the Architectural Design Standards state “An additional wing may be added to any mass of the building. This wing must be attached at the rear or side of the building and may not extend forward of the main body.” Staff notes this wing would be projecting from the front façade facing Middleton Road. Revise plans to depict the proposal on the side or rear of the house. b) Section IV-4(h)(3) of the Architectural Design Standards state “Additions should be designed to be compatible with the main structure by incorporating materials and a foundation to match.” Staff notes the proposed materials would not be compatible with the main house. c) Section IV-4(c) of the Architectural Design Standards state “All roofs in all the wings must be of the same shape as the main body, but they may have a different pitch or orientation. Roofs shall not intersect a wall so as to cause a valley.” The proposal has a shed roof while the existing has a gable roof. Attachments: 7487 Darrow Rd. AHBR Packet City of Hudson, Ohio Page 3 Printed on 4/18/2025 Architectural & Historic Board of Review CD Meeting Agenda - Final April 23, 2025 E. AHBR 25-152 148 West Prospect Addition & Alteration Submitted by Kline Home Exteriors a) Section IV-4(g) of the Architectural Design Standards states “Roofs on projections should match the roof material of the building (unless both roofs are flat) and to the extent possible, shall be same kind of roof. Natural finish metals such as copper, terne coated steel, or lead may be substituted for any roofing material.” And “Materials used on an open porch or screen room need not be the same as other materials in the structure, but should be related to materials used in the details of the structure.” Staff notes the proposal depicts a metal roof while the main house is shingled. b) Question how the proposed screens on the rear porch will tie into the ground c) Confirm all window openings will remain and no new opening are proposed. d) Question the proposed exposed foundation and if it is consistently applied on all elevations. e) Submit specification sheets of the proposed hardi-board siding and exposed foundation material. Attachments: 148 W. Prospect AHBR Packet VII. Other Business A. AHBR- Discussion of Planning Commission Subcommittee - Review of Appendix A - Submittal Submittal Requirements Requirements Attachments: Staff Memo - PC subcommittee - AHBR Submittal Requirements VIII. Staff Update IX. Adjournment * * * The mission of the Hudson City Government is to serve, promote and support, in a fiscally responsible manner, an outstanding community that values quality of life, a well-balanced tax base, historic preservation, with a vision to the future, and professionalism in volunteer and public service. City of Hudson, Ohio Page 4 Printed on 4/18/2025

Get email alerts for Hudson

A daily email when new agendas and minutes are posted.

Report an issue with this meeting