City Council

I DAHO City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID FALLS Minutes Thursday, November 25,2025 7:30 PM City Council Chambers 1. Call to Order Present: Mayor Rebecca L Noah Casper Council President Lisa Burtenshaw Councilor John Radford Councilor Michelle Ziel-Dingman Councilor Jim Freeman Councilor Jim Francis Councilor Kirk Larsen Also present: Pam Alexander, Municipal Services Director Darin Jones, Human Resources Director Josh Roos, IFP Chief Financial Officer Wade Sanner, CDS Director Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning and Consulting Meghan Conrad, Elam and Burke (via Teams) Zack Jones, Interim City Attorney Emily Geisler, City Clerk 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Casper led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Public Comment No one appeared. 4. Consent Agenda A. Office of the Mayor 1. 25-466 Appointment of Colter Wilson to the Board of Adjustment, appointment of Mary Scales to the Planning Commission and the reappointment of TJ Nottestad to the Impact Fee Advisory Committee. B. Municipal Services 1. 25-451 Replacement phone system using RingCentral and VLCM for a total cost of $117,708.60 2. 25-452 Professional services agreement with the Idaho Falls Arts Council for a total cost of $77,250. {Councilor Freeman recused himself, he is on their board.) 3. 25-455 Treasurer’s report for September 2025. C. Public Works 1. 25-454 Minutes from the [Public Works Department] Annual Meeting held 7/16/2025. 2. 25-457 Bid Award for North Highland Park 2026 Concrete Improvements to JM Concrete for $165,045. D. Idaho Falls Power 1 I DAHO City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID FALLS Minutes 1. 25-457 Eastern Idaho Community Action Partnership agreement for a not to exceed amount of $150,000. {Councilor Radford recused himself, he is their CEO.) E. Office of the City Clerk 1. 25-453 City Council Meeting Minutes (10.9.2025,10.20.2025,10. 23.2025. 11.10.2025} 2. 25-424 October 2025 permits & licenses, which included: a. 46 New Business Licenses b. 59 Renewed Business Licenses c. 21 Contractor Licenses Motion 1: Approve, accept, or receive all items on the Consent Agenda according to the recommendations presented. o Moved by: Council President Burtenshaw o Second: Councilor Larsen o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Larsen. Nay: none. Abstain: Freeman, Radford. o Motion carries. 5. Regular Agenda A. Municipal Services 1. 25-460 Addition to Public Works Fleet - One 2026 John Deere Wheel Loader Presentation/Discussion (Director Alexander): Approval is requested to add a new vehicle to the City fleet - a 2026 John Deere wheel loader for the Water Division - purchased through a cooperative contract for $285,215.40. Because this is an expansion rather than a replacement, it require separate Council action. Director Fredericksen clarified a Council member’s question about what a wheel loader is, explaining it as a large, four-wheel loader commonly used for moving substantial material, unlike a backhoe. Motion: Accept and approve the purchase of one 2026 John Deere Wheel Loader from the Sourcewell cooperative purchasing #011723-JDC from John Deere for a total of $285,215.40 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessarydocuments. o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Council President Burtenshaw o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Freeman. Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. B. Human Resources 1. 25-431 Proposed Changes to Personnel Policies 330,410, and 500 Presentation/Discussion (Director Jones): HR presented three personnel policy updates following a standard review process. No employee feedback was received after the initial September review. 2 I DAHO City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls. ID FALLS Minutes 1. Policy 330 - Drug & Alcohol Policy: Adds public transportation employees (for future expansion) to the group eligible for drug/alcohol testing and corrects a decimal error related to allowable blood alcohol content. 2. Policy on Court/Legal Practices: Clarifies confusing language about court-duty compensation to make clear that employees are paid only for work-related court appearances, not personal legal matters. Additional discussion clarified circumstances where employees may be named in lawsuits individually versus in their official City role. 3. Policy 500 - Salary Schedule & Pay Grades: Adjusts effective dates for pay changes because the current HR/payrolL system cannot process mid-cycle changes. Changes will take effect on the first day of the following pay period until the Workday system goes live. Motion: Approve the changes to personnel policies 330,410, and 500. o Moved by: Councilor Dingman o Second: Councilor Francis o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. C. Idaho Falls Power 1. 25-449 Surplus used Demand Shifter to the College of Eastern Idaho (CEI) Presentation/Discussion (CFO Roos): Idaho Falls Power requested approval to surplus and donate an obsolete solar-panel battery backup system originally purchased in 2012 usingfederal grant funding. The battery vendor has since gone out of business, eliminating technical support and renderingthe equipment unusable. The unit also needs to be removed to accommodate an upcoming parking-lot expansion. The College of Eastern Idaho expressed interest in using the equipment for educational purposes, and City policy allows donation to a community college. Municipal Services approved the request. Council members confirmed the equipment has no remaining market value and that the City had benefited from it during its operational life. Motion: Approve the surplus retirement of IFP’s used Demand Shifter to the College of Eastern Idaho (CEI). o Moved by: Councilor Freeman o Second: Councilor Dingman o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. D. Community Development Services 3 I DAHO City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID FALLS Minutes 1. 25-467 Legislative Hearing for Consideration of an Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverside Urban Renewal Project and a Resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement with Bonneville County Presentation/Discussion (Meghan Conrad, Brad Cramer, Director Sanner): The ordinance includes several exhibits: 1. The resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, validating conformity of the Urban Renewal Plan for the First Amendment to the River Commons Urban Renewal Project with the City of Idaho Falls’ Comprehensive Plan 2. Legal Notice for the City Council Meeting 3. Riverside Urban Renewal Plan 4. Bonneville County Ordinance - Transfer of Powers 5. Intergovernmental Agreement with Bonneville County 6. Riverside Ordinance summary 7. Riverside Ordinance *lt was noted that there is an error on the presentation showing Bannock County (Slide ^6). Also, the amount on Slide #20 should be closer fo $26,000,000.00* The discussion centered on a proposed urban renewal/revenue allocation district designed to accelerate development along a key area of the City, including portions of the Snake River corridor. The plan includes careful financial planning, economic feasibility studies, and statutory compliance, ensuring the district stays within the 10% valuation limit of the City’s taxable value, with a 20-year termination date and clear disposition of assets at closure. Revenue projections, based on private investment of roughly $600 million and anticipated public project costs of $63 million, indicate that both owner participation areas will have sufficientfunding for reimbursable expenses, with significant excess revenue available for additional community projects. Council members discussed the district’s boundaries, noting some public park areas are included while other potential sites, like the islands under the dam, could be added laterthrough amendments without changingthe district’s expiration date. The proposed development aligns with City planning goals for commercial and mixed-use projects and defers to City planning documents for permitting, including any future overlays along the river corridor. The district is seen as one of the largest urban renewal areas in the City, comparable to Snake River Landing, and represents a historic level of investment in the community. Urban renewal is considered a tool to overcome challenges such as geologic obstacles and historic debris, ensuring infrastructure is properly constructed and projects proceed efficiently. Council members highlighted the plan’s broad benefits: protecting the river corridor, enhancing recreational and aesthetic assets, supporting private investment, growing the tax base, and creating long-term community infrastructure. 4 I DAHO City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID FALLS Minutes Public Testimony: None was provided. Motion 1: Approve the Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverside Urban Renewal Project and revenue allocation area under a suspension of the rules requiring three complete and separate readings and request that it be read by title and published by summary, o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. Ordinance Title Read: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IDAHO FALLS, IDAHO. APPROVING THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE RIVERSIDE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, WHICH PLAN INCLUDES REVENUE ALLOCATION FINANCING PROVISIONS: AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION TO COUNTY AND STATE OFFICIALS AND THE AFFECTED TAXING ENTITIES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION. AND PUBLICATION BY SUMMARY; APPROVING THE SUMMARY OF THE ORDINANCE; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE READING RULES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion 2: Approve the Resolution approving the intergovernmental agreement with Bonneville County and give authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the necessary documents, o Moved by: Councilor Larsen o Second: Councilor Radford o Vote: Aye: Burtenshaw, Dingman, Francis, Freeman, Larsen, Radford. Nay: none o Motion carries. 6. Announcements ● Thanksgiving Community Meal: A free meal will be served at the Salvation Army on Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., open to everyone. ● Peaking Plant Ribbon Cutting: On Thursday, December 4th, the City will hold a ribbon cutting for its new natural gas-powered peaking plant at 11 a.m., followed by public tours until 1:30 p.m. The plant will help meet peak power demands efficiently and stay within budget. ● Upcoming Meetings: The next City Council work session is scheduled for December 8th, and the next Council meeting will be on December 11th. ● Closing: Officials wished everyone a happy Thanksgiving and encouraged community participationin the events. 5 I DAHO City Council Meeting 680 Park Avenue Idaho Falls, ID FALLS Minutes There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:42 PM Rebecca L. Noah 6 From: Zach Jones To: Emily Geisler Subject: FW: EICAP Contract with Idaho Falls Power Date: Monday, November 24, 2025 9:35:20 AM Attachments: imaaeOOl.DnQ Emily—Here’s Councilmember Radford's written disclosure for the EICAP contract, which I forwarded to the other City Councilmembers. I DAHO FALLS Zachary H. Jones | Interim City Attorney 375 D street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 Work: (208)612-8169 Fax; (208)612-8175 z|Qnes(g^idahofails gov From: Zach Jones Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 7:37 AM Subject: FW: EICAP Contract with Idaho Falls Power City Councilmembers Please see the email below from Councilmember John Radford. This is a formality to ensure that we are in compliance with the applicable laws for disclosing conflicts of interests. Best, IDAHO FALLS Zachary H. Jones | Interim City Attorney 375 D Street Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402 Work: (208)612-8169 Fax: (208)612-8175 ziones@idahofalls qov From: John Radford < - > Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2025 7:28 PM To: Rebecca Casper < >; Zach Jones < >; Stephen Boorman < > Subject: EICAP Contract with Idaho Falls Power Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is  safe. Hello, I am writing to inform the parties to this email the intention of EICAP to seek a contract with Idaho Falls Power. This is not a new contract, the two parties have been engaged in this relationship for decades, the change is my position as the sole signatory agent for EICAP and my position on the Idaho Falls City Council. I am writing this email at the urging of our City Attorney Zach Jones. He advised me to tell you all of my conflict of interest and my intention to not participate in the vote or discussion of this matter when it emerges at council, lama fixed salaried employee at EICAP and cannot benefit through gaining this contract, for many reasons, not the least of which is the contract has been in place for many years. I do not hold any ownership in EICAP as it is a 501C3 and a Non-Profit organization. Thank you. John Radford IDAHO FALLS City Council November 25, 2025 IDAHO FALLS Riverside Urban Renewal Project  Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverside Urban Renewal Project daho Falls City Counci November 25, 2025 This Project Area includes an estimated 214 acres (including public rights-of- way). ✓5 ●1.^ NOT A PARI I -/ / / I Project Area / SEC 25 I / T2N I R37E I i _ ✓ j / ✓ ✓ SEC 36 i h T2N { T2N y R37E / R37E y I si' SlMNYSJOe ROAD \ i i o Horrocks.l RIVERSIDE DISTRICT m l0*^»r»Kti>«WO2 OVERALL EXHIBIT  n Approval Process ● March 20, 2025- Agency Board adopted Resolution No. 2025-04 accepting the Riverside Eligibility Report, prepared by Brad Cramer, Perspective Planning & Consulting LLC, and, thereafter, submitted the Report to the City Council and Bonneville County for their consideration ● July 8, 2025, Bonneville County adopts Resolution No. 25-07, adopting the Riverside Eligibility Report. ● July 10, 2025- City Council adopts Resolution No. 2025-10, adopting the Riverside Eligibility Report and directs Agency to commence preparation of a plan ● September 18, 2025- Agency Board adopted Resolution No. 2025-14 approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverside Urban Renewal Project recommending approval of the Riverside Plan and directing transmittal of the Riverside Plan to the Mayor and City Clerk to take the necessary action to process the Riverside Plan ● October 7, 2025- City Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to find the Riverside Plan conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan ● October 16, 2025, - BOCC approval of the Intergovernmental Agreement and Transfer of Powers Ordinance ● October 24, 2025- Notice of public hearing published in the newspaper of record and the Riverside Plan received by the affected taxing districts. ● November 7, 2025- Second notice of public hearing published in the newspaper ● November 25, 2025- City Council public hearing, consider public comment, and City Council Ordinance approving the Riverside Plan; CC approval of the intergovernmental agreement Taxing Districts ● Bonneville County ● Bonneville County Ambulance ● Bannock County Road & Bridge ● City of Idaho Falls ● College of Eastern Idaho ● Idaho Falls School District # 91 ● Fire District #1 *4 P an E ements ■t -.“T r V ● '■ —»●' / T r'j'i / ●« ●■ ●- T Idaho Code § 50-2905 identifies what information the Plan must include with specificity as follows: (1) A statement describing the total assessed valuation of the base assessment roil of the revenue allocation area and the total assessed valuation of all taxable property within the municipality; ● Section 502.3 (2) A statement listing the kind, number, and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the revenue allocation area; ● Section 301 and Attachments 5 (3) An economic feasibility study; ♦ Attachments 5 (4) A detailed list of estimated project costs; ● Attachments 5 (5) A fiscal impact statement showing the impact of the revenue allocation area, both until and after the bonds are repaid, upon all taxing districts levying taxes upon property on the revenue allocation area; ● Section 502.8 and Attachments 5 (6) A description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when related costs or monetary obligations are to be incurred; ♦ Sections 303, 304, 309, 501, 502, 503, 504 and Attachments 5 (7) A termination date for the plan and the revenue allocation area as provided for in section 50-2903(20), Idaho Code. In determining the termination date, the plan shall recognize that the agency shall receive allocation of revenues in the calendar year following the last year of the revenue allocation provision described in the urban renewal plan; and ● Section 800 (8) A description of the disposition or retention of any assets of the agency upon the termination date. Provided, however, nothing herein shall prevent the agency from retaining assets or revenues generated from such assets as long as the agency shall have resources other than revenue allocation funds to operate and manage such assets. ♦ Section 800 - no impact on the disposition of assets Ri\ er Commons District^' $154,412 Eagle Ridge District $7,549,640 Jackson Hole Junction District $864,666 Panchcri East Bank District $5,965,637 Anderson Bush District $6,536,269 Stanley Boge District $42,308,702 Snake River West District (Estimated) $547,415 Yellowstone Square District (Estimated) $9,533,697 Ri^■erside District Proposed (Estimated) $34,013,401 Total of Existing and Proposed Districts $107,473,839.00  A 'i -.r> ■ - V V* 'N-.i- f z RIVERSIDE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY r * y ■'-r" .y 5 h\ y>-.● ■^‘' >1 .r '> c.j'yi'' t ;iw ●●/.; 5'py , ■ v,1i^ 't ■ ■>. *< ●A’,  STUDY APPROACH Reviewed potential private development projects, timelines, and valuations Reviewed known and potential public infrastructure projects, timelines and costs Considered two revenue scenarios based on trends in city valuations and levies Considered two potential Owner Participation Agreements  / r vm;#% r>i :■■ ^ E' bmf4 ^s’ u -t’ ]ffl? 1 B ●r -, » r y-i iTH. 5 r‘ / V. t<r \ r * »TH »y: j 0 m .y r/ *v ●●●. X:JA :«|i # W- * ●''.:.»»*■ ● .^1 V I / \(\ <' ■* /. ▲ /■ I ',i. /- /* rjs '\ / W-- t0 4 J< .' A, ■ r / ■VT'. r 'Ji J? ,/'■/< ■u 'Srify'* / > > I / * ) / ■i-i. I- ●V 0 > . ft* :,-5> STUDY AREA "r / I [B / T. 1- & f / t f j.-. II BOUNDARIES w ■f 7 K -■ V '71 V 3SF .. « m- ■' ●’1C- d - /’A *● k;^ li?* > A ■i: ●ir!^i t. \ $ / c j? V i % -Tl- Mf,- ! « 'Vj ●wl-' \ ■''.dv VO●' f i-iJ . .●Ir' T 1 Wi, / 7SI t w 1 , rf‘'K w/^ IKE w I I 'll' — /^Tyx*’ /7 ui '.fv .■%ai’- E 'C J jsr I .— - ,●> ,/s, f » . -.●/r (■ lj}!Ti v»i r|-^ ^ /v.^ t h—♦ ^ i: '®- If i I I V-.’r^ t'l j _ ^SSmSi ?rro I r r“f f!  rufi .t-r < « X r- iiilxi I OPA AREAS nmivmwPM i \ ] AREA 2  ANTICIPATED PRIVATE INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC PROJECT COSTS Area Investment I: Snake River Landing $591,345,281 2: Dealerships $4,000,000 TOTAL $595,345,281 Area Public Project Costs I: Snake River Landing $32,939,744 2: Dealerships $500,000 City/Agency Projects $29,850,000 TOTAL $63,289,744  LEVY AND VALUATION TRENDS Levy Rate City Valuation 0.016 $9,000,000,000 0.0! 4 $8,000,000,000 $7,000,000,000 0.012 $6,000,000,000 0.01 $5,000,000,000 0.008 $4,000,000,000 0.006 $3,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 0.004 $1,000,000,000 0.002 $- 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 City Valuation  CONSERVATIVE REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS Conservative RevenueiTotal valuation increases 2% per year Applicable tax levy decreases 1% per year Moderate RevenueiTotal valuation increases 5% per year Applicable tax levy decreases 2% per year Base value remains unchanged Revenues collected year after valuation year Project area will be approved by the end of 2025  Total Project Area Annual Revenue Comparisons $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- Conservative Revenue Moderate Revenue  Total Project Area Cumulative Revenue Comparisons $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 Conservative Revenue Moderate Revenue  TOTAL PROJECT AREA CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS Accounts for respective revenue assumptions Estimated revenues reflects actual year revenues received, based on prior year’s valuations Accounts for two Owner Participation Agreements Snake River Landing Area Dealership Area IFRA will collect 10% ofTIF revenues for district administration up to a maximum of $200,000 annually All funds will be expended on projects by the end of the district  Administration (10% of Fund Carrs’over Estimated Debt Serv ice Revenues, Max for Public Year Revenues (OPA) 75% $200,000) OPA 1 Balance OPA 2 Balance Projects 2025 $ $ $ $ 32,939,744 $ 500,000 $ 2026 $ $ $ $ 32,939,744 $ 500,000 $ 2027 $ 6,081 $ $ 608 $ 32,939,744 $ 500,000 $ 5,472 2028 $ 12,161 $ $ 1,216 $ 32,939,744 $ 500,000 $ 16,417 2029 $ 18,242 $ $ 1,824 $ 32,939,744 $ 500,000 $ 32,835 2030 $ 24,324 $ $ 2,432 $ 32,939,744 $ 491,981 $ 54,727 TOTAL PROJECT 2031 $ 1,055,746 $ 791,809 $ 105,575 $ 32,182,404 $ 457,639 $ 213,089 AREA CASH 2032 $ 1,650,504 $ 1,237,878 $ 165,050 $ 30,981,267 $ 421,050 $ 460,665 2033 $ 1,887,108 $ 1,415,331 $ 188,711 $ 29,604,954 $ 382,211 $ 743,731 FLOWWITH 2034 $ 2,437,618 $ 1,828,213 $ 200,000 $ 27,818,039 $ 341,117 $ 1,153,135 CONSERVATIVE 2035 $ 3,109,622 $ 2,332,216 $ 200,000 $ 25,529,405 $ 297,765 $ 1,730,541 REVENUE 2036 $ 3,276,359 $ 2,457,270 $ 200,000 $ 23,118,005 $ 252,151 $ 2,349,631 2037 $ 3,452,231 $ 2,589,173 $ 200,000 $ 20,576,994 $ 204,270 $ 3,012,688 2038 $ 3,790,455 $ 2,842,842 $ 200,000 $ 17,784,611 $ 154,119 $ 3,760,302 2039 $ 4,185,374 $ 3,139,030 $ 200,(H)0 $ 14,698,340 $ 101,692 $ 4,606,646 2040 $ 4,403,370 $ 3,302,528 $ 200,000 $ 11,450,878 $ $ 5,507,488 2041 $ 4,734,578 $ 3,550,933 $ 200,000 $ 7,957,322 $ $ 6,491,133 2042 $ 5,010,642 $ 3,757,982 $ 200,000 $ 4,259,034 $ $ 7,543,793 2043 $ 5,112,387 $ 3,834,290 $ 200,000 $ 486,760 $ $ 8,621,890 2044 $ 5,168,139 $ 476,638 $ 200,000 $ (0) $ $ 13,113,391 2045 $ 5,224,392 $ $ 200,000 $ $ $ 18,137,783 2046 $ 5,281,152 $ $ 200,000 $ $ $ 23,218,935 TOTAL PROJECT AREA CASH FLOW WITH MODERATE REVENUE  FINDINGS The Riverside project is economically feasible Both OPAs will have sufficient funding for full reimbursement Each area within the project is independently economic feasible There will be significant excess funds which can be used for other eligible projects identified by the City, IFRA, or the developer QUESTIONS? PERSPECTIVE PLANNING « CONSULTING  Additional Plan Reauirements The adjusted base assessed value of the existing ● Agricultural Operation Consents revenue allocation areas, plus the new Project Area is estimated as follows (March 2025): ● If an Ag Consent is not Total Taxable Value of the City: $8,103,605,399 obtained, the property will not 10% Value Limitation: $ 810,360,540 be included in the RAA Existing Plans:* $ 73,460,438 New Area: $ 34,013,401 Total: $107,473,839 The existing base value, plus the current value of the proposed Area is well within the 10% value limitation. *lncludes estimated values for Snake River West District, Yellowstone Square District, and proposed Riverwalk District FLUM and ZONING Znnitiq Mnp IFRA25-001 Riverside Area ComprehonsivR Plan IFRA25-001 Riverside Area M SuburtMT 07 Cure Transect 01 HMirai eta) Occr IBS fpkiMi (M MV 0) r "w4unft»5fa5 Post-July 1, 2016, Plan ● Limitations on Amendments to the Plan - I.C. 50-2903A ● Base reset and RAA ● Exceptions  ● November 25, 2025 - City Council public hearing, consider public comment, and City Council ordinance readings ● Thereafter: publication of the ordinance summary; recordation of ordinance and separately recorded Next Steps map/legal; transmittal of documents to County officials, STC and affected taxing districts ● Deadline to complete tasks 12/31/2025  ?f'--V- t .* it V si :●.%■«● 1 V Jt ● " ^;V- ■ tfj ' ■€W3 ■711f .'.● 1*^' Questions/Comments? 'V ●«, Tf C- \ . X X 'I' m /●- (>. .V ►V ●i >* 1/^ r ■Lk  Suggested Motion: Move to waive readings and approve Ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the Riverside Urban Renewal Project and give authorization for Action the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents (or take other action deemed appropriate).